Bathing Water Directive report Hungary

Similar documents
Bathing Water Directive report Greece

Bathing Water Directive report Finland

Bathing Water Directive report Austria

Bathing Water Directive report The Czech Republic

Country report. Danish bathing water quality in Denmark. May Photo: Peter Kristensen

Country report. Slovenian bathing water quality in Slovenia. May Photo: Peter Kristensen

Country report. Lithuanian bathing water quality in Lithuania. May Photo: Peter Kristensen

Bathing Water Directive report Bulgaria

Country report. Swedish bathing water quality in Sweden. May Photo: Peter Kristensen

Country report. Croatian bathing water quality in Croatia. May Photo: Peter Kristensen

Country report. Italian bathing water quality in Italy. May Photo: Peter Kristensen

Country report. Swedish bathing water quality in Sweden. May Photo: Peter Kristensen/EEA

Country report. Portuguese bathing water quality in Portugal. May Photo: Peter Kristensen

Country report. Bulgarian bathing water quality in Bulgaria. May Photo: Peter Kristensen

Country report. Czech bathing water quality in Czech Republic. May Photo: Peter Kristensen

Country report. Austrian bathing water quality in Austria. May Photo: Peter Kristensen

Bathing water results 2012 Germany

Country report. Belgian bathing water quality in Belgium. May Photo: Peter Kristensen/EEA

Bathing water results 2012 Denmark

Bathing water results 2010 Romania

Bathing water results 2010 Austria

Bathing water results 2008 Malta

BATHING WATER QUALITY IN GREECE

Bathing water results 2012 Italy

Bathing Water Directive (2006/7/EC)

Bathing water results 2009 Bulgaria

European bathing water quality in 2013

Bathing water results 2010 The Czech Republic

Bathing water results 2011 Bulgaria

Bathing Water Directive. Ed Beard Defra Bathing Water Conference Southport March 2013

European bathing water quality in 2012 ISSN

European Bathing Water Quality in 2017 ISSN /

Quality of bathing water 2008 bathing season

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

EUROPEAN UNION. Strasbourg, 15 February 2006 (OR. en) 2002/0254 (COD) C6-0050/2006 LEX 669 PE-CONS 3659/6/05 REV 6

Bathing water results 2010 Germany

Beach Awards & Clean Coasts. Annabel FitzGerald Coastal Programmes Manager EEU An Taisce EPA National Water Event 11 th June 2014

Bathing water results 2011 France

2013 No. 151 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. The Quality of Bathing Water (Amendment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2013

Bathing Water Profile - Rinroe Beach, Carrowtigue (2013)

COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 79/409/EC. of 2 April on the conservation of the wild birds

Extension of monitoring of the sea bathing water quality in Croatia (EU directive 2006/7/EC) Importance of beach sediment characteristics

105 CMR MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR BATHING BEACHES STATE SANITARY CODE, CHAPTER VII

World Leading Traffic Analysis

INFORMATION NOTE No 353: MICROBIOLOGICAL TESTING

Bathing Water and Health

Bathing water results 2010 Italy

Visualising seasonal-diurnal trends in wind observations

The World s Largest Inflatable Water Slide A Public Health Nightmare. Presenters: Megan Savill - EH Team Leader Michelle Speek - Senior EHO

BLUE FLAG BEACH CRITERIA AND EXPLANATORY NOTES 2010

Hamilton Public Health Services 2014 Beach Monitoring Report

Official Journal of the European Union

Scaling up of ADAS Traffic Impacts to German Cities

Economic and Social Council

Planning Daily Work Trip under Congested Abuja Keffi Road Corridor

Posting of workers in the European Union and EFTA countries : Report on A1 portable documents issued in 2010 and 2011

Issue Date no data available Revision date 04-Dec-2012 Version 1. Section 1: PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION

CAS Guidance (CAS-G-004)

AB AMBER GRID RULES FOR NATURAL GAS TRANSMISSION SYSTEM BALANCING I. GENERAL PROVISIONS

General Guidance on the Voluntary Interim Application of the D1 Ballast Water Exchange Standard in the North-East Atlantic and the Baltic Sea

5 HUMAN BEINGS ELECTRICAL AND MAGNETIC FIELDS

SAFETY DATA SHEET. according to Regulation (EC) No. 2015/ Relevant identified uses of the substance or mixture and uses advised against

VISIMIX LAMINAR. BLENDING OF NON-NEWTONIAN LIQUID. POWER. CIRCULATION. MIXING TIME.

Nordel GRID DISTURBANCE AND FAULT STATISTICS

EU Policy regarding management of Bluetongue disease, prevention and control measures

Remote sensing standards: their current status and significance for offshore projects

Page 1 GM-FAQ Club Profile FAQs. Page

Database of Winds and Waves. -internet version-

Traffic Impact Study. Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio. TMS Engineers, Inc. June 5, 2017

Municipal waste management in Cyprus

WildCat RF unit (0.5W), full 32-byte transmissions with built-in checksum

MANAGING POLICY INTERACTION WITH THE EU ETS 27 September Alex Luta

EXPLOSIVE ATMOSPHERES - CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARDOUS AREAS (ZONING) AND SELECTION OF EQUIPMENT

Issue Date no data available Revision date 04-Dec-2012 Version 1. Section 1: PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION

ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND POWER QUALITY REPORT for the year ended 30 June 2017

SAFETY DATA SHEET. according to Regulation (EC) No. 2015/830

SAFETY DATA SHEET Kilfrost ALV According to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Annex II, as amended by Regulation (EU) No 453/2010

Guidance on the compilation of safety data sheets Version 1.0 September Guidance on the compilation of safety data sheets

Chapter 5 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION

Citrus, Hernando, and Pasco Coastal Hazard Analysis. Flood Risk Review Meeting Citrus, Hernando, and Pasco Counties, Florida December 14, 2017

ELIZABETH RIVER FACTS

14 OTTER SPECIES ACTION PLAN

Keywords: 7SI/Brown bear/harvest/harvest quota/hunting/malme/management/ mortality/population size/trend/ursus arctos

Internet Technology Fundamentals. To use a passing score at the percentiles listed below:

SAFETY DATA SHEET WONDARWELD

SAFETY DATA SHEET. (REACH regulation (EC) n 1907/ n 2015/830)

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

Bay County, MI Coastal Hazard Analysis Flood Risk Review Meeting. May 14, 2018

AS91430: Cycleways Waiopehu College Year 13 Geography Matt Reeves

INTERIM ADVICE NOTE 171/12. Risk Based Principal Inspection Intervals

Sea Level Rise and Coastal Flooding Why Waves Matter!

The Corporation of the City of Sarnia. School Crossing Guard Warrant Policy

SAFETY DATA SHEET Sultrapon WD20

Coastal Inundation. An Overview for TCDC

SAFETY DATA SHEET (REACH regulation (EC) n 1907/ n 2015/830)

SAFETY DATA SHEET. according to Regulation (EC) No. 2015/ Relevant identified uses of the substance or mixture and uses advised against

OTIF = Intergovernmental Organisation for International Carriage by Rail (Bern) ECE = United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (Geneva)

ANSI N323A and ANSI N323B

CHAPTER 8 ASSESSMENT OF COASTAL VULNERABILITY INDEX

2018 COM Doc. No. COC-303_Appendix 1 / oct.-18 (11:37 )

Transcription:

Bathing Water Directive report 2013 Hungary The report gives a general overview of information acquired from the reported data, based on provisions of the Bathing Water Directive 1. The reporting process is described below, as well as state and trends of bathing water quality in Hungary. 1. BWD reporting in 2013 season In 2013 bathing season, 241 bathing waters have been reported in Hungary. For each bathing water, five groups of parameters have been delivered: basic identification data including name, location, geographic type of bathing water and availability to bathers; seasonal data including season start and end, national quality classification in present season, potential management measures and changes in quality; monitoring results disaggregated numerical values of two microbiological parameters intestinal enterococci and Escherichia coli (also known as E. coli), recorded at each water sample taken; abnormal situation periods periods of unexpected situations that have, or could reasonably be expected to have, an adverse impact on bathing water quality and on bathers' health; reporting is optional; Bathing waters of Hungary in 2013 Total reported 241 Coastal / Inland 241 Season period Year-round Coastal / Inland 1 Jan to 31 Dec Samples taken 843 Share of bathing waters 65 % with good or excellent water quality New BWD implemented in 2008 short-term pollution periods identifiable events that adversely affect water quality by faecal contamination; reporting is optional; The authorities of Hungary initiated new BWD (2006/7/EC) reporting in 2008 season. The 2013 season data were delivered to the European Commission by 20 December 2013. Altogether, 241 bathing waters have been reported 1.1% of all bathing waters in Europe. Out of all bathing waters in Hungary, 15 (6.22%) have been newly identified in 2013 season. Six bathing waters have been delisted 2. All bathing waters are inland. 843 samples were taken at bathing waters throughout the season three per bathing water on average. 1 Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/lexuriserv/lexuriserv.do?uri=oj:l:2006:064:0037:0051:en:pdf 2 Bathing waters which were identified in 2012 season, but not in 2013 season

Inland bathing season period was year-round due to thermal spring being used for bathing. Season duration varies for inland bathing waters. 111 bathing waters (46 % of all bathing waters) have been reported in a total of 40 groups. The majority of groups are located on Lake Balaton and Lake Velence. Abnormal situations have been reported at seven bathing waters. Additionally, a short-term pollution event has been reported at one bathing water. Individual bathing waters were also temporarily closed due to flood. Detailed information on individual bathing waters is available from national bathing water profiles at http://oki.antsz.hu/. 2. Assessment methodology During the bathing season, water samples are taken and analysed for two bacteria, Escherichia coli and intestinal enterococci which may indicate the presence of pollution, usually originating in sewage or livestock waste. The results of the analysis are used to assess the quality of the bathing waters concerned and to provide information to the public on the quality of the water in the bathing sites concerned. According to the BWD, the bathing water sample dataset should satisfy the following conditions: a minimum of one sample per month 3 a minimum of four samples per season 4 a minimum of 16 samples in total 5 four consecutive seasons 6 a pre-season sample 7 The monitoring took place at all identified bathing waters, while 78% of bathing waters satisfied the described sampling frequency rules set by the Directive. Table 1 shows the share of bathing waters that did not satisfy monitoring frequency, as well as corresponding reasons. 3 The interval between two samples should not exceed 31 + 4 days, provided that the next sampling is done according to the monitoring calendar; exception applies for temporarily closed bathing waters 4 Three samples if the season does not exceed eight weeks or the region is subject to special geographical constraints 5 12 samples if the season does not exceed eight weeks or the region is subject to special geographical constraints 6 The condition does not apply if the bathing water is newly identified or any changes have occurred that are likely to affect the classification 7 A pre-season sample is taken into account at total number of samples per season

Table 1: Number of assessed bathing waters in 2013 Bathing waters Total number Bathing waters with sampling frequency not satisfied with sampling of bathing frequency Insufficiently waters in 2013 Closed Not sampled Total satisfied sampled 241 187 53 1 0 54 However, in pursue of maximum possible count of bathing waters to be taken into account for statistical purposes, limited number of other bathing waters have been assessed as well. This includes all bathing waters that have set of samples for a competent quality classification, but lack pre-season sample or frequency between sample dates is larger than defined in the directive. However, samples have to be equally distributed throughout the season. Bathing waters are accordingly classified to one of the BWD quality classes: excellent good sufficient poor The classification is based on pre-defined percentile values for microbiological enumerations, falling in the certain class given in Annex I of the Directive. This defines different limit values for coastal and inland waters. 3. Bathing water quality The results of the bathing water quality in Hungary for the period of 2010 2013 as reported in the past reporting years and for the bathing season of 2013 are presented in Figure 1 (for coastal bathing waters) and Figure 2 (for inland bathing waters). The previous reports are available on the European Commission's bathing water quality website 8 and the European Environment Agency's bathing water website 9. 3.1 Coastal bathing waters There are no coastal bathing waters in Hungary. 3.2 Inland bathing waters 67.2% of the inland bathing waters met at least sufficient water quality in 2013. 0.4% of bathing waters had to be closed during the bathing season. See Appendix 1 for numeric data. 8 http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-bathing/index_en.html 9 http://www.eea.europa.eu/themes/water/status-and-monitoring/state-of-bathing-water

Figure 1: Inland bathing water quality trend in Hungary. Note: the At least sufficient class also includes bathing waters of Excellent quality class, the sum of shares is therefore not 100%. 4. Information regarding management and other issues No specific management measures have been described by national authorities. 5. Interactive information on bathing water quality in Europe The bathing water section of the Water Information System for Europe (WISE), which is accessible at the EEA bathing water website (http://www.eea.europa.eu/themes/water/interactive/bathing/stateof-bathing-waters), allows users to view the bathing water quality at more than 22 000 coastal beaches and inland sites across Europe. Data is aggregated and visualized on national and station level. Detailed information regarding specific bathing site are given in pop-up windows (can be activated with a click on a selected bathing location) and bathing water profiles which can be opened through hyperlinks in pop-up windows. The data on bathing water quality in 2013 and previous years can also be viewed in WISE bathing water data viewer, an application prepared by TC Vode (http://bwd.eea.europa.eu/). The WISE bathing water quality data viewer combines text and graphical visualisation, providing a quick overview of the locations of coastal and inland bathing waters, as well as statistics on their quality. Specific bathing water locations can be observed on Google Earth, Google maps or Bing maps.

Total Appendix 1: Results of bathing water quality in Hungary from 2010 to 2013 Total Excellent (compliant with guide values) At least sufficient (compliant with mandatory values) Poor (not compliant) Closed (banned) Quality classification not possible* No % No % No % No % No % 2010 251 117 46.6 140 55.8 5 2.0 20 8.0 86 34.3 2011 228 127 55.7 153 67.1 7 3.1 0 0.0 68 29.8 2012 232 132 56.9 162 69.8 5 2.2 8 3.4 57 24.6 2013 241 128 53.1 162 67.2 4 1.7 1 0.4 74 30.7 Note: the At least sufficient class also includes bathing waters which are of excellent quality, the sum of shares is therefore not 100%. * This includes new bathing waters, bathing waters with changes that affect or could have affected bathing water quality, and bathing waters that do not have enough samples.

Appendix 2: Bathing water quality map