THE FIELD RULES FOR THE EAGLEVILLE (EAGLE FORD-2) FIELD, DE WITT, KARNES, LAVACA AND LIVE OAK COUNTIES, TEXAS

Similar documents
RAILROAD CoMMIssIoN OF TExAs

Panther Oil & Gas EXAMINER'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Enbridge G & P (East Texas) LP EXAMINER S REPORT AND PROPOSAL FOR DECISION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Kerry A. Pollard Texstar Midstream Utility, LP Gallon E. Gray Phillip Zamzow EXAMINER S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

OIL AND GAS DOCKET NO

OIL AND GAS DOCKET NO

Mobeetie Resource Dev LLC EXAMINER S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Representing EXAMINERS REPORT AND PROPOSAL FOR DECISION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Fairway Resources Operating, LLC PROCEDURAL HISTORY

EXAMINER S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Enbridge Pipelines (NE Texas) LP EXAMINER S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Representing EXAMINERS REPORT AND PROPOSAL FOR DECISION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

BEFORE THE STATE OIL AND GAS BOARD OF MISSISSIPPI. CORPORATION TO AMEND THE SPECIAL jyu g g 2qqi, FINAL ORDER

LISA IVSHIN, SUPERVISOR

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL WELL POTENTIAL TEST, COMPLETION OR RECOMPLETION REPORT, AND LOG

FRAC FLUIDS AND WATER USAGE Evaluating The Commercial Viability and Success In Using Water-Free Fracs

THE STATE OIL AND GAS BOARD OF MISSISSIPPI. RE: EMERGENCY PETITION OF FOREST OIL him o 4 jogg

BEFORE THE STATE OIL AND GAS BOARD OF MISSISSIPPI. i RE: PETITION OF ALLEN OPERATING COMPANY nfccord

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL WELL POTENTIAL TEST, COMPLETION OR RECOMPLETION REPORT, AND LOG

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL WELL POTENTIAL TEST, COMPLETION OR RECOMPLETION REPORT, AND LOG

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING FORM H-9 STATEWIDE RULE 36 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

Oil Well Potential Test, Completion or Recompletion Report, and Log

High Cost Gas Statewide Rule 101 (Tight Formations)

in the manner and way provided by law and the rules and

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL WELL POTENTIAL TEST, COMPLETION OR RECOMPLETION REPORT, AND LOG

Friday 3 rd February, 2012

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL WELL POTENTIAL TEST, COMPLETION OR RECOMPLETION REPORT, AND LOG

Oil Well Potential Test, Completion or Recompletion Report, and Log

Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission

PETITION OF SHELL OIL COMPANY TO MAKE PERMANENT THE PRESENT SPECIAL FIELD RULES FOR THE SOUTHWEST PINEY

Petroleum Development

BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA

BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMIS OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA MID-CONTINENT, INC. DRILLING AND SPACING UNIT NEWFIELD EXPLORATION MID-CONTINENT, INC.

Oklahoma Corporation Commission Oil & Gas Conservation Division Post Office Box Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Rule 165:

Railroad Commission of Texas. Chairman Barry T. Smitherman Commissioner David Porter Commissioner Christi Craddick

Railroad Commission of Texas

Oil Well Potential Test, Completion or Recompletion Report, and Log

Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (COGCC) Completed Interval Report, Form 5A Data Field Definitions

Captains Meeting 2009 Introduction to Well Testing- Expro. Edwin Schoorl

Tuesday 4 th September, 2012

Friday 14 th September, 2012

Disposal/Injection Well Pressure Test Report (H-5)

Coal Bed Methane (CBM) Permeability Testing

RULES OF THE OIL AND GAS PROGRAM DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES CHAPTER DRILLING WELLS TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTERIM DIRECTIVE ID 94-2

Perforating Options Currently Available in Horizontal Shale Oil and Gas Wells. Kerry Daly, Global BD Manager- DST TCP

APPENDIX A1 - Drilling and completion work programme

Approval of the Finding that the City of Hughson's Sphere of Influence Expansion is Logical and Orderly

Industry Code: Alberta Small Employer OHS Legislated Requirements

4 RESERVOIR ENGINEERING

Perforation Design for Well Stimulation. R. D. Barree Barree & Associates LLC

Advanced Applications of Wireline Cased-Hole Formation Testers. Adriaan Gisolf, Vladislav Achourov, Mario Ardila, Schlumberger

Statewide Rule 36: H2S

Texas Administrative Code

Beaver Creek Madison Reservoir Management and Conformance

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY OFFICE OF OIL, GAS, AND MINERALS OIL AND GAS OPERATIONS

Chapter 5 HORIZONTAL DRILLING

Casing and Cementing Requirements

W I L D W E L L C O N T R O L FLUIDS

ASX Announcement. Target Energy Fairway Reserves Update. Corporate information. 20 September 2017

Coal and Water Protection. PADEP: Well Plugging & Subsurface Activities Division Bureau of Oil and Gas Planning & Program Management

AMITE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI "UJ * m

API # of Hydraulically Fractured Well. API #/ID of Well that Experienced Communication Adjacent Operator Start Date

Reclassification and Recompletion

BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA FAIRWAY ENERGY, LLC CHAPARRAL ENERGY, LLC RELIEF SOUGHT POOLING CAUSE CD NO.

North Dakota Petroleum Council Re-stimulation Initiative

ENERGY SECTOR ROADWAY REPAIR PROJECT. August 15, 2013 Industry Workshop

Acid Gas Progress Report Requirements

WORKING WITH OIL WELLS PRODUCING GAS BELOW THE BUBBLE POINT IN TIGHT ROCK

Study Guide IADC WellSharp Driller and Supervisor

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Details for PDQ Operatorr s Production and Disposition Volumes by Lease by Month

Permeability. Darcy's Law

CHDT Cased Hole Dynamics Tester. Pressure testing and sampling in cased wells

OIL/GAS WELL COMPLETION REPORT. Well Name and Number Surveyed elevation (feet): KB GL

Orion In Situ Oil Sands 2014 Progress Update. Presented May 21, 2015

Extended leak off testing

Limited Entry Revolution

Elko County Wildlife Advisory Board 571 Idaho Street, Room 105, Elko, Nevada Phone Fax

GAS CONDENSATE RESERVOIRS. Dr. Helmy Sayyouh Petroleum Engineering Cairo University

Depth Bracket Allowable Determination and Proration of Oil Production in Louisiana

Perforation Techniques in brown fields for Production optimization.

Natural Gas Prorationing v. Take-or-Pay: The Riskshifting

Situated 250km from Muscat in

126 FERC 61,182 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ORDER REJECTING TARIFF FILINGS. (Issued February 27, 2009)

SUPPLEMENT Well Control for Drilling Operations Workover & Completion for Drillers Core Curriculum and Related Learning Objectives

D.B. Wilson Station CCR Landfill

PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY SKILL TEST

New Single Well Gas Lift Process Facilitates Fracture Treatment Flowback

Innovating Gas-Lift for Life of Well Artificial Lift Solution. The Unconventional Solution!

Swimming pool defined.

Drilling Efficiency Utilizing Coriolis Flow Technology

SUPPLEMENT Well Control for Drilling Operations Workover & Completion for Supervisors Core Curriculum and Related Learning Objectives

Simposium Nasional dan Kongres X Jakarta, November 2008 Makalah Profesional IATMI

and we protect correlative rights. And, as I said, we do this throughout the State, regardless of land ownership.

QUARTERLY ACTIVITIES REPORT. Successful drilling of Primero West-1 well and Nyanda-4 corehole.

OCEAN DRILLING PROGRAM

RULE 36 & H 2 S SAFETY

North Dakota Department of Mineral Resources

CAN MUDLOGGING SHOWS BE QUANTIFIED?

Transcription:

OIL AND GAS DOCKET NO. 01-0274323 THE APPLICATION OF EOG RESOURCES, INC. TO AMEND AND MAKE PERMANENT THE FIELD RULES FOR THE EAGLEVILLE (EAGLE FORD-1) FIELD, ATASCOSA, DIMMIT, GONZALES, LA SALLE, MCMULLEN, WILSON AND ZAVALA COUNTIES, TEXAS OIL AND GAS DOCKET NO. 02-0274324 THE APPLICATION OF EOG RESOURCES, INC. TO AMEND AND MAKE PERMANENT THE FIELD RULES FOR THE EAGLEVILLE (EAGLE FORD-2) FIELD, DE WITT, KARNES, LAVACA AND LIVE OAK COUNTIES, TEXAS OIL AND GAS DOCKET NO. 02-0274313 THE APPLICATION OF EOG RESOURCES, INC. TO CANCEL OVER-PRODUCTION FOR THE BROTHERS UNIT, EAGLEVILLE (EAGLE FORD) FIELD, GONZALES COUNTY, TEXAS OIL AND GAS DOCKET NO. 02-0274609 THE APPLICATION OF EOG RESOURCES, INC. TO CANCEL OVER-PRODUCTION FOR THE GREENLOW UNIT, EAGLEVILLE (EAGLE FORD) FIELD, KARNES COUNTY, TEXAS HEARD BY: Richard D. Atkins, P.E. - Technical Examiner Marshall F. Enquist - Legal Examiner DATE OF HEARING: April 5, 2012 APPEARANCES: REPRESENTING: APPLICANT: Doug Dashiell EOG Resources, Inc.

Roberto T. Alaniz Dan M. Wilkirson David Frye PAGE 2 INTERESTED PARTIES: Sandra Buch Meri Lynn Gobran Thomas M. Weber James M. Clark Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. Murphy Expl. & Prod. Co. - USA Talisman Energy USA, Inc. OBSERVERS: David Gross Ryan Dobbs Mickey R. Olmstead Hess Corporation Comstock Resources Cinco Resources, Inc. Paloma Resources EXAMINERS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION STATEMENT OF THE CASE Temporary Field Rules for the Eagleville (Eagle Ford-1) and Eagleville (Eagle Ford- 2) Fields were adopted in Final Order Nos. 01-0266450 and 02-0266475, effective November 30, 2010, as amended. The current Field Rules are summarized as follows: 1. Designation of the fields as the correlative interval from 10,294 feet to 10,580 feet, as shown on the log of the EOG Resources, Inc. - Milton Unit, Well No. 1 (API No. 42-255-31608); 2. 330' lease line spacing for the perpendicular distance along a horizontal drainhole, 100' lease line spacing for the first and last take points and no between well spacing with special provisions for take points, off-lease penetration point and a box rule for horizontal drainhole wells; 3. 80 acre oil units with the assignment of additional acreage for horizontal wells pursuant to Statewide Rule 86; 4. Allocation based on 100% acres, a maximum oil allowable of 800 BOPD and no casinghead gas limitation for oil wells. Field Rule Nos. 5 and 6 for the Eagleville (Eagle Ford-2) Field were adopted in Final

PAGE 3 Order No. 02-0271345, effective August 23, 2011, to provide for a six month exception to Statewide Rules 13 and 51, that require producing an oil well through tubing and the timely filing of potential tests. Both subject fields contain H2S and all operators are required to comply with the provisions contained in Statewide Rule 36. EOG Resources, Inc. ( EOG ) requests that the Field Rules for both subject fields be amended to provide for a 100 foot surface box rule, optional forty acre density and a top oil allowable of 2,000 BOPD. In addition, EOG requests that Field Rule Nos. 5 and 6 in the Eagleville (Eagle Ford-2) Field be adopted for the Eagleville (Eagle Ford-1) Field and that the Field Rules for the two subject fields be made permanent. EOG also requests that all over-production in the two subject fields, as well as any over-production in the fields consolidated into the two subject fields, and the over-production on the Brothers and Greenlow Units be canceled. The examiners recommend approval of the amended Field Rules with the exception of the 100 foot surface box rule, cancellation of any over-production and that the Field Rules be made permanent for the two subject fields. EOG did not consider this recommendation to be adverse. DISCUSSION OF THE EVIDENCE The Eagleville (Eagle Ford-1) Field was created in November 2010 by the consolidation of the Dilworth, Leesville and Pilgrim (Eagleford) Fields. The average depth of the field is 10,600 feet and there are 367 producing oil wells carried on the proration schedule. Cumulative production from the field through February 2012 is 17.2 MMBO and 18.9 BCFG. The Eagleville (Eagle Ford-2) Field was created in November 2010 by the consolidation of the Eagleville and Klotzman (Eagleford) Fields. The average depth of the field is 10,300 feet and there are 248 producing oil wells carried on the proration schedule. Cumulative production from the field through February 2012 is 15.7 MMBO and 23.9 BCFG. EOG submitted cross sections that show that the proposed Eagleville (Eagle Ford-1) and Eagleville (Eagle Ford-2) Fields produce from the Eagle Ford formation which extends across the eleven counties that are the subject of these applications. This interval includes the entire Eagle Ford formation and is located stratigraphically between the base of the Austin Chalk and the top of the Buda Lime formations. The two subject fields operate under Field Rules that provide for 330' lease line spacing for the perpendicular distance along a horizontal drainhole, 100' lease line spacing for the first and last take points and no between well spacing with special provisions for take points, off-lease penetration point and a box rule for horizontal drainhole wells and 80 acre density. EOG has been decreasing the distance between horizontal drainhole wells from 600

PAGE 4 feet representing 80 acre density down to 500 feet representing 65 acre density. EOG submitted decline curves on horizontal drainhole wells on its Harper, Mitchell and Henkhaus Units that show no interference for wells drilled on 65 acre density. EOG is currently drilling horizontal drainhole wells on a 300 foot between well spacing to test if the wells will experience any interference. EOG opined that to effectively drain the Eagle Ford formation, a reduced density below 80 acres will be required. As a result, EOG requests 40 acre optional density. The proposed exceptions to Statewide Rule 13(b)(5)(a) and Statewide Rule 51(a) will allow operators of flowing oil wells in these two fields the flexibility to run tubing and file completion paperwork, without penalties, once the pressure and production rates have declined. Commission staff in the Field Operations Section have no issues with approving the proposed rules. The Eagle Ford formation is unique in that it contains an oil zone on top of a gas zone. Since the permeability is less than a microdarcy, EOG believes that there is no migration of fluids in the reservoir and wells only produce fluids that are contacted by the fracture treatment. As a result, the recovery factor is the same for both oil and gas wells. Since many wells in the Eagle Ford trend have high initial potentials of over 2,000 BOPD and there is no migration of reservoir fluids, EOG requests a 2,000 BOPD allowable and that the daily casinghead gas limitation for oil wells be eliminated. EOG also requests that all over-production in the two subject fields, as well as any over-production in the fields consolidated into the two subject fields, and the overproduction on the Brothers and Greenlow Units be canceled. The two Units are overproduced by 23,981 and 594 barrels of oil, respectively. Both subject fields contain H2S and all operators are required to comply with the provisions contained in Statewide Rule 36. EOG proposes that the amended Field Rules be made permanent in the two subject fields. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Notice of this application and hearing was provided to all persons entitled to notice at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing. 2. The Eagleville (Eagle Ford-1) Field was created in November 2010 by the consolidation of the Dilworth, Leesville and Pilgrim (Eagleford) Fields. The average depth of the field is 10,600 feet and there are 367 producing oil wells carried on the proration schedule. 3. The Eagleville (Eagle Ford-2) Field was created in November 2010 by the consolidation of the Eagleville and Klotzman (Eagleford) Fields. The average depth of the field is 10,300 feet and there are 248 producing oil wells carried on the proration schedule. 4. The two subject fields operate under Field Rules that provide for 330' lease

PAGE 5 line spacing for the perpendicular distance along a horizontal drainhole, 100' lease line spacing for the first and last take points and no between well spacing with special provisions for take points, off-lease penetration point and a box rule for horizontal drainhole wells and 80 acre density. 5. Adoption of a 40 acre optional density rule for the Eagleville (Eagle Ford-1) and Eagleville (Eagle Ford-2) Fields is appropriate. a. Lower permeability and porosity of the Eagle Ford formation will reduce the ultimate recovery and drainage area of the wells. b. Decline curves on horizontal drainhole wells show no interference for wells drilled on 65 acre density. c. To effectively drain the Eagle Ford formation, a reduced density below 80 acres will be required. 6. Since many wells in the Eagle Ford trend have high initial potentials of over 2,000 BOPD and there is no migration of reservoir fluids, a 2,000 BOPD allowable and no daily casinghead gas limitation for oil wells is appropriate for the two fields. a. The Eagle Ford formation is unique in that it contains an oil zone on top of a gas zone. b. Since the permeability is less than a microdarcy, there is no migration of fluids in the reservoir. c. Wells only produce fluids that are contacted by the fracture treatment. d. The recovery factor is the same for both oil and gas wells. 7. Exceptions to Statewide Rule 13(b)(5)(a) and Statewide Rule 51(a) will allow operators of flowing oil wells in these two fields the flexibility to run tubing and file completion paperwork, without penalties, once the pressure and production rates have declined. a. Tubing installation can not occur until after a well has been fracture stimulated and the composite plug debris has been flowed back. b. Frac treatment requires high volumes of fluid and proppant that cannot be done down tubing.

PAGE 6 c. Frac treatment requires high pressures that tubing can not accommodate, as the pressures required exceed the tubing s burst pressure. d. Additional time is needed to schedule workover rigs and crews during the current high demand environment. e. A six month exception is appropriate for the two fields, as typically, new oil wells have high initial rates of production, followed by a steep decline. 8. The cumulative over-production on the Brothers and Greenlow Units is 23,981 and 594 barrels of oil, respectively. 9. The Eagleville (Eagle Ford-1) and Eagleville (Eagle Ford-2) Fields contain wells with H2S concentrations over 100 ppm and should be regulated pursuant to Statewide Rule 36. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Proper notice of this hearing was issued. 2. All things have been accomplished or have occurred to give the Commission jurisdiction in this matter. 3. Approval of the amended Field Rules and making the Field Rules permanent for the Eagleville (Eagle Ford-1) and Eagleville (Eagle Ford-2) Fields is necessary to prevent waste, protect correlative rights and promote development of the fields. 4. Cancellation of all overproduction in the Eagleville (Eagle Ford-1) and Eagleville (Eagle Ford-2) Fields, as well as any over-production in the fields consolidated into the two subject fields, and the over-production on the Brothers and Greenlow Units will not cause waste and will not harm correlative rights. RECOMMENDATION Based on the above findings of fact and conclusions of law, the examiners recommend that the Commission approve the amended Field Rules, cancel the overproduction and make the Field Rules permanent for the Eagleville (Eagle Ford-1) and Eagleville (Eagle Ford-2) Fields, as requested by EOG Resources, Inc.

PAGE 7 Respectfully submitted, Richard D. Atkins, P.E. Technical Examiner Marshall F. Enquist Legal Examiner