STANDARDIZED CPUE FOR BLUE SHARKS CAUGHT BY THE JAPANESE LONGLINE FISHERY IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN,

Similar documents
STANDARDIZED CPUE FOR BLUE SHARK AND SHORTFIN MAKO CAUGHT BY THE JAPANESE TUNA LONGLINE FISHERY IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN

STANDARDIZED CPUE FOR BLUE SHARKS CAUGHT BY JAPANESE LONGLINE FISHERY IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN

ESTIMATION OF CATCHES FOR BLUE SHARK AND SHORTFIN MAKO BY THE JAPANESE TUNA LONGLINE FISHERY IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN,

UPDATE OF STANDARDIZED CPUE FOR BLUE SHARK CAUGHT BY THE JAPANESE TUNA LONGLINE FISHERY IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN

UPDATED STANDARDIZED CPUE FOR ALBACORE CAUGHT BY JAPANESE LONGLINE FISHERY IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN,

TRENDS IN STANDARDIZED CPUE FOR SHORTFIN MAKO SHARK CAUGHT BY THE JAPANESE LONGLINE FISHERY IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN

STANDARDIZED CPUE OF SHORTFIN MAKO (ISURUS OXYRINCHUS) CAUGHT BY THE JAPANESE TUNA LONGLINE FISHERY IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN

CATCH CHARACTERISTICS OF TROPICAL TUNA CAUGHT BY KOREAN TUNA LONGLINE FISHERY IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE SECOND REGULAR SESSION August 2006 Manila, Philippines

ANALYSIS OF OPERATION PATTERN OF JAPANESE LONGLINERS IN THE TROPICAL ATLANTIC AND THEIR BLUE MARLIN CATCH

STANDARDIZATION OF CPUE OF SWORDFISH CAUGHT BY JAPANESE LONGLINERS IN THE NORTH ATLANTIC

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATES OF BLUE AND MAKO SHARKS BYCATCH AND CPUE OF TAIWANESE LONGLINE FISHERY IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN

JAPANESE LONGLINE CPUE FOR YELLOWFIN TUNA (THUNNUS ALBACARES) IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN STANDARDIZED USING GLM UP TO 2014

PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF CATCH RATES OF ATLANTIC BONITO (SARDA SARDA) CAUGHT BY MOROCCAN ARTISANAL GILL NET FISHERY IN THE ATLANTIC,

ESTIMATION OF THE SIZE STRUCTURE OF BLUEFIN TUNA (THUNNUS THYNNUS) CATCHES BY MOROCCAN TRAPS AND ARTISANAL HAND LINE FISHERY

STANDARDIZATION OF AGE SPECIFIC CPUE OF SWORDFISH CAUGHT BY JAPANESE LONGLINERS IN THE NORTH ATLANTIC

STANDARDIZED CPUE FOR BIGEYE TUNA CAUGHT BY THE JAPANESE TUNA LONGLINE FISHERIES OPERATED IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN UP TO 2013

REVISION OF TASK II SIZE DATA OF BLUEFIN TUNA CATCH BY JAPANESE LONGLINE FROM THE 1970s TO PRESENT

CATCH AND EFFORT DATA OF THE MALTESE DOLPHIN FISH FISHERY (2001)

SCRS/2006/090 Col. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 60(4): (2007)

THE EFFECT OF EASTERN ATLANTIC AND MEDITERRANEAN BLUEFIN TUNA SAMPLING ERROR ON THE CATCH AT AGE

REVIEW OF BIGEYE TUNA CATCH INCLUDING FISH SIZE BY JAPANESE LONGLINE FISHERY IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN

STANDARDIZATION OF BIGEYE TUNA CPUE IN THE MAIN FISHING GROUND OF ATLANTIC OCEAN BY THE JAPANESE LONGLINE FISHERY USING REVISED METHOD

DESCRIPTION OF THE JAPANESE LONGLINE FISHERY AND ITS FISHERY STATISTICS IN THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA DURING THE RECENT YEARS

STANDARDIZED AGE SPECIFIC CATCH RATES FOR ALBACORE, Thunnus alalunga, FROM THE SPANISH TROLL FISHERY IN THE NORTHEAST ATLANTIC,

Draft. Hiroki Yokoi, Yasuko Semba, Keisuke Satoh, Tom Nishida

NOMINAL CATCH RATES FOR CANADIAN BLUEFIN TUNA IN 2006

Updated and revised standardized catch rate of blue sharks caught by the Taiwanese longline fishery in the Indian Ocean

SCRS/2003/084 Col. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 56(3): (2004)

STANDARDIZED CATCH RATES OF BLUEFIN TUNA, THUNNUS THYNNUS, FROM THE ROD AND REEL/HANDLINE FISHERY OFF THE NORTHEAST UNITED STATES DURING

STANDARDIZED CATCH RATE OF SAILFISH (Istiophorus platypterus) CAUGHT BY BRAZILIAN LONGLINERS IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN ( )

Standardized CPUE of Indian Albacore caught by Taiwanese longliners from 1980 to 2014 with simultaneous nominal CPUE portion from observer data

CATCH-AT-SIZE AND AGE ANALYSIS FOR ATLANTIC SWORDFISH

ANALYSIS OF THE SIZE FREQUENCY DATA OF BLUEFIN TUNA (THUNNUS THYNNUS) OBTAINED FROM THE BIOLOGICAL SCRAPS SAMPLING,

NOMINAL CPUE FOR THE CANADIAN SWORDFISH LONGLINE FISHERY

CPUE standardization of black marlin (Makaira indica) caught by Taiwanese large scale longline fishery in the Indian Ocean

OVERVIEW OF THE ITALIAN FLEET FISHING ALBACORE (THUNNUS ALALUNGA)

PRELIMINARY STANDARDIZED CATCH RATES FOR BLUEFIN TUNA (Thunnus thynnus) FROM THE TRAP FISHERY IN TUNISIA

BIGEYE (THUNNUS OBESUS) BY-CATCH ESTIMATES FROM THE ALBACORE SPANISH SURFACE FISHERY IN THE NORTH EAST ATLANTIC, 2014

ANALYSIS OF TURKISH SWORDFISH (XIPHIAS GLADIUS) CATCH RATES IN THE EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN

Craig A. Brown. NOAA Fisheries, Southeast Fisheries Center, Sustainable Fisheries Division 75 Virginia Beach Drive, Miami, FL, , USA

TRENDS IN TOTAL MORTALITY USING A LENGTH-BASED INDICATOR APPLIED TO ATLANTIC BLUE MARLIN (MAKAIRA NIGRICANS)

Commercial Bycatch Rates of Shortfin Mako (Isurus oxyrinchus) from Longline Fisheries in the Canadian Atlantic

Memorandum of longline CPUE for yellowfin tuna by Z. Suzuki prepared for discussion in the WPYRG, June 1992, Honolulu

STANDARDIZED CATCH RATES OF THE SHORTFIN MAKO (ISURUS OXYRINCHUS) CAUGHT BY THE TAIWANESE LONGLINE FISHERY IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN

United States Commercial Vertical Line Vessel Standardized Catch Rates of Red Grouper in the US South Atlantic,

BLUEFIN TUNA CAUGHT BY SENEGALESE BAITBOAT AND LANDED IN DAKAR IN 2013

SCRS/2015/058 Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 72(5): (2016)

Addendum to SEDAR16-DW-22

Estimated sailfish catch-per-unit-effort for the U.S. Recreational Billfish Tournaments and U.S. recreational fishery ( )

Size and spatial distribution of the blue shark, Prionace glauca, caught by Taiwanese large-scale. longline fishery in the North Pacific Ocean

HISTORICAL SIZE STRUCTURE OF BLUEFIN TUNA PURSE SEINER S CATCH: DATA RECOVERED FROM BALFEGÓ LOGBOOKS DATA ( )

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE SIXTH REGULAR SESSION August 2010 Nuku alofa, Tonga

Note on the yearly catches by country and gear of the FISM (France Ivory Coast Senegal - Morocco) fleet during the period

2012 UPDATE OF THE CANADIAN BLUEFIN TUNA FISHERY AND CPUE SERIES

Fishery Subsidies: Japan

STANDARDIZED NORTH EAST ATLANTIC ALBACORE (THUNNUS ALALUNGA) CPUEs FROM THE SPANISH BAITBOAT FLEET, PERIOD

DESCRIPTION OF THE MALTESE LONGLINE FISHERY TARGETING BLUEFIN TUNA (THYNNUS THUNNUS L.) IN THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA

2009 UPDATE ON CANADA S BLUEFIN TUNA FISHERIES

ANALYSIS OF SEX-RATIO BY LENGTH-CLASS FOR BLUEFIN TUNA (Thunnus thynnus L.) IN THE WESTERN MEDITERRANEAN AND EASTERN ATLANTIC

6 th Meeting of the Scientific Committee Puerto Varas, Chile, 9-14 September SC6-Doc21 Chinese Taipei s Annual Report

SCRS/2007/079 Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 62(5): (2008)

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE TENTH REGULAR SESSION. Majuro, Republic of the Marshall Islands 6-14 August 2014

SCRS/2006/083 Col. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 60(4): (2007)

REPORT ON THE TURKISH BONITO (Sarda sarda) FISHERY IN 2000/2001

Update on recent modifications of fishing gear and fishing procedures to reduce bycatch of sea turtles in longline fishery

EVOLUTION OF FISHING EFFORT OF GILL NETTING CANOES TARGETING LARGE PELAGIC FISH IN THE GULF OF GUINEA by

ARE EU LOG-BOOKS SUITABLE TO COMPUTE SIZE FREQUENCIES OF BLUEFIN TUNA CATCHES OF THE FRENCH PURSE SEINERS?

Cami T. McCandless and Joesph J. Mello SEDAR39- DW June 2014

SCRS/2010/074 Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 66(3): (2011)

SWORDFISH (XIPHIAS GLADIUS L.) FISHERIES USING MESOPELAGIC LONGLINE IN THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA BY ITALIAN FISHING FLEET

STATISTICS OF THE SPANISH ALBACORE (THUNNUS ALALUNGA) FISHERY IN THE NORTH EASTERN ATLANTIC DURING 2001 SUMMER SEASON

STOCK ASSESSMENT FOR SOUTH ATLANTIC ALBACORE USING A NON-EQUILIBRIUM PRODUCTION MODEL

CONTRADICTORY CATCH RATES OF BLUE SHARK CAUGHT IN ATLANTIC OCEAN BY BRAZILIAN LONG-LINE FLEET AS ESTIMATED USING GENERALIZED LINEAR MODELS

CATCH RATES FOR SAILFISH (Istiophorus albicans) FROM THE SMALL SCALE DRIFT GILLNET FISHERY OFF LA GUAIRA, VENEZUELA: Period

DOCUMENT SAC-09 INF A(i )

SCRS/2005/031 Col. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 59(1): (2006)

DOCUMENT SAC-06 INF-L

Shark Catches by the Hawaii-based Longline Fishery. William A. Walsh. Keith A. Bigelow

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE TENTH REGULAR SESSION. Majuro, Republic of the Marshall Islands 6-14 August 2014

Some Biological Parameters of Bigeye and Yellowfin Tunas Distributed in Surrounding Waters of Taiwan

JAPAN. Japan Fisheries Agency , Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, , Japan. National Research Institute of Far Seas Fisheries, FRA

REVIEW AND PRELIMINARY ANALYSES OF SIZE FREQUENCY SAMPLES OF BLUEFIN TUNA (THUNNUS THYNNUS)

DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS ON ATLANTIC BLUE AND SHORTFIN MAKO SHARKS

USING DELTA-GAMMA GENERALIZED LINEAR MODELS TO STANDARDIZE CATCH RATES OF YELLOWFIN TUNA CAUGHT BY BRAZILIAN BAIT-BOATS

Yellowfin tuna catch opportunities in Cape Verde coping with uncertainties of local CPUEs

SCRS/2008/039 Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 64(6): (2009)

EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF CHANGES IN FISHING PRESSURE ON ATLANTIC TROPICAL TUNAS USING YIELD-PER-RECRUIT AND SPAWNER-PER-RECRUIT ANALYSES

SEDAR52-WP November 2017

Commercial Bycatch Rates of Blue Shark (Prionace glauca) from Longline Fisheries in the Canadian Atlantic

SCTB16 Working Paper FTWG 5

STANDARDIZED CPUE OF BLUEFIN TUNA (THUNNUS THYNNUS) CAUGHT BY SPANISH TRAPS FOR THE PERIOD

Freddy Arocha 1 and Mauricio Ortiz 2 SUMMARY

Standardized catch rates of U.S. blueline tilefish (Caulolatilus microps) from commercial logbook longline data

Skipjack catch per unit effort (CPUE) in the WCPO from the Japanese pole-and-line fisheries

CATCH AND EFFORT BY KOREAN FLAGGED FLEET

SCRS/2015/057 Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 72(5): (2016)

STANDARDIZED CPUE FROM THE ROD AND REEL AND ARTISANAL DRIFT- GILLNET FISHERIES OFF LA GUAIRA, VENEZUELA, UPDATED THROUGH 2014

STANDARDIZED CATCH RATES OF BLUEFIN TUNA, THUNNUS THYNNUS, FROM THE ROD AND REEL/HANDLINE FISHERY OFF THE NORTHEAST UNITED STATES DURING

Shark catch characteristics by national longliner fleets in Madagascar

Transcription:

SCRS/2004/119 Col. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 58(3): 1127-1134 (2005) STANDARDIZED CPUE FOR BLUE SHARKS CAUGHT BY THE JAPANESE LONGLINE FISHERY IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN, 1971-2003 Hideki Nakano, Shelley Clarke 1 SUMMARY The standardized catch per unit effort (CPUE) for blue shark caught by Japanese longline fishery in the Atlantic Ocean was updated using logbook data from 1971-2003 filtered such that only those cruises which reported catching at least one shark in at least 70% of all sets were retained. For most of this period, shark catches were not classified, therefore all sharks are assumed to be blue sharks. Blue shark CPUEs indicate relatively stable trends during the past three decades for North, South and whole Atlantic stock hypotheses. RÉSUMÉ La capture par unité d effort (CPUE) standardisée du requin peau bleue capturé par la pêcherie palangrière japonaise dans l océan Atlantique a été actualisée à l aide des données des carnets de bord de 1971-2003 filtrées de telle manière que seules les sorties où il a été déclaré une capture d au moins un requin dans au moins 70% de toutes les opérations ont été retenues. Pour la plupart de cette période, les prises de requins n ont pas été classifiées, c est pourquoi on postule que tous les requins sont des requins peaux bleues. Les CPUE des requins peaux bleues indiquent des tendances relativement stables au cours des trois dernières décennies pour les hypothèses des stocks de l Atlantique Nord, Sud et de l ensemble de l Atlantique. RESUMEN Se ha actualizado la captura por unidad de esfuerzo (CPUE) estandarizada para la tintorera capturada por la pesquería japonesa de palangre en el Océano Atlántico utilizando datos de los cuadernos de pesca desde 1971 hasta 2003 filtrados de tal forma que sólo se han mantenido aquellas campañas en las que se declaró la captura de al menos un tiburón en al menos el 70% de todos los lances. Para la mayoría de este periodo, las capturas de tiburones no están clasificadas, por lo que se asume que todos los tiburones son tintoreras. Las CPUE de la tintorera indican tendencias relativamente estables durante las tres décadas pasadas para las hipótesis de stock del Atlántico norte, sur y total. KEYWORDS High seas fisheries, Long line, Tuna fisheries, Time series analysis, Catch/effort, Blue shark 1 National Research Institute of Far Seas Fisheries, FRA, Japan, 5-7-1 Orido, Shimizu-Ku, Shizuoka, SHIZUOKA, 424-8633, Japan E-mail: hnakano@affrc.go.jp 1127

1. Introduction Nakano and Honma (1996) analyzed the CPUE of pelagic sharks in the Atlantic Ocean using Japanese longline logbook data filtered by shark reporting category, e.g. the ratio of sets in which sharks were caught relative to the total number of sets in a cruise. Shiode and Nakano (2001) examined shark species composition and CPUE by reporting category through comparison to records of shark catch by Japanese observers and concluded that CPUE calculated from filtered logbook data could be used as an abundance index of the species. This was because sharks records in the filtered logbook data since the implementation of species-specific reporting requirements are composed of more than 86% of blue shark catch (in number) and the CPUE calculated from the filtered logbook data was in the range of variation observed in the CPUE as recorded by onboard observers. The standardized CPUE of pelagic sharks caught by the Japanese longline fishery in the Atlantic Ocean was introduced in previous reports submitted to the ICCAT Sub-committee on By-catches (Nakano and Honma 1996, Nakano 1998, Nakano 1999, Nakano 2001). Since the Japanese longline fishery has widely covered the high seas area of the Atlantic Oceans, its fishery statistics should be one of the most valuable means of describing the stock status of pelagic sharks. Since there is international concern over the conservation of elasmobranch species, it is useful to examine recent trends in the stock status of blue shark using the most recent logbook data from tuna fisheries. This paper estimates the standardized CPUEs of blue shark in the Atlantic Ocean using the logbook data of the Japanese longline fishery from 1971 to 2003. 2. Materials and methods Data from records in which the reporting rate was greater than or equal to 70% were used in this analysis. The time series of the data extends for 33 years from 1971 to 2003, but data for 2003 is provisional. Standardized CPUE (number of sharks caught per 1,000 hooks) were calculated using a generalized linear model (SAS Ver. 6.12, MIXED procedure (SAS Institute 1996)) to eliminate biases arising from differences in effort by fishing ground and fishing season. Although the MIXED procedure can handle random-effect parameters, only fixed-effect parameters were used, therefore the results from the MIXED procedure will agree with those from the GLM procedure. The MIXED procedure was used because it produces several useful information criteria values. For standardization, CPUE was calculated for each set within a cruise. The area strata used for the analysis are shown in Figure 1. Numbers of branch line between floats were classified into three categories. The CPUE values for blue sharks were obtained for same three geographical units used in the previous report, i.e. the north, south and overall Atlantic Ocean. The north unit includes Areas 1 to 5; the south includes Areas 6 to 8. The equation for standardizing CPUE was as follows: ln(cpue + const) = μ + YR + QT + AR + br + INTER + ε where ln: natural logarithm, CPUE: nominal CPUE (catch in number per 1,000 hooks), const : 1/10 of overall mean, μ: overall mean, YR: effect of year, QT: effect of quarter, AR: effect of area, br: branch line criteria (number of branch lines between buoys; <9, 9-14, 14<), INTER: any combination of two way interactions, andε: normal error term. The same effects selected for previous report including interaction terms were used for this analysis. The interactions included for the models were QT*AREA and QT*br for the North, South and overall Atlantic stock hypothesis. 3. Results and discussion Table 1 shows number of observations in each year by geographical unit, respectively. Type III analysis revealed that all main effects and modeled interactions of the selected models were significant (Table 2). Figure 2 shows the standardized CPUEs for the North, South and whole Atlantic units. The values of CPUE ranged between 1.0 and 7.0 and were in the range of CPUE values reported by onboard observers in the longline fishery. The reported CPUE of pelagic sharks (number of caught per 1,000 hooks) in the literature ranges from 1.31 to 38.8 (Strasburg 1958, Lopez et al. 1979, Witzell 1985, Hazin et al. 1990, Taniuchi 1990, Bonfil 1994). The results from the Japanese logbook data indicate relatively stable levels with small fluctuations in the North 1128

unit, and some high levels of CPUE observed between 1976 and 1981 in the South and overall units. The CPUE for the North unit indicates a decreasing trend in 1996-2000, then shows staying around 1.0. Regarding the South, it shows decreasing trend from 2000. Although the trends in CPUE differ between North and South, fluctuations in CPUE were small relative to those observed in tunas and billfishes caught by Atlantic fisheries (ICCAT 2003). Overall, the results of this analysis suggest that the stock status of blue sharks has not changed drastically over the past three decades in the high seas area of the Atlantic Ocean. The sharks caught in Atlantic high seas are mainly consist of blue shark (Strasburg 1958, Hazin et al. 1990, Bonfil 1994, Matsunaga and Nakano 1996, Nakano and Honma 1996) and as concluded above the stock status of blue sharks in the Atlantic Ocean appears not to have greatly changed during the study period. However, there is little information relating to the long-term stock status for other pelagic shark species which inhabits the high seas area. It is necessary to conduct further onboard research activities, such as observer programs, to examine the population dynamics for each species. References BONFIL, R. 1994. Overview of world elasmobranch fisheries. FAO fisheries technical paper 341, pp. 119. HAZIN, F.H., A.A. Couto, K.Kihara, K. Otsuka, and M. Ishino. 1990. Distribution and abundance of pelagic sharks in the south-western equatorial Atlantic. J. Tokyo Univ. Fish. 77(1):51-64. ICCAT 2003. Report for biennial period, 2002-03, part I (2002) Vol. 2, Madrid, Spain. 216pp. LOPEZ, A.M., D.B. McClellan, A.R. Bertolino and M.D. Lange. 1979. The Japanese longline fishery in thegulf of Mexico, 1978. Mar. Fish. Rev. 41(10):23-28. MATSUNAGA, H and H. Nakano 1996. CPUE trend and species composition of pelagic shark caught byjapanese research and training vessels in the Pacific Ocean. Information Paper submitted to the CITES Animals Committee held at Pruhonice, Czech Republic, 1996. NAKANO, H. 1998. Standardized CPUE for pelagic shark caught by the Japanese longline fishery in the Atlantic Ocean. ICCAT CVSP Vol. XLVIII (3):72-76. NAKANO, H. 1999. Updated standardized CPUE for pelagic sharks caught by the Japanese longline fishery in the Atlantic Ocean. ICCAT CVSP Vol. LI 2000, SCRS/99/41 8pp. NAKANO, H. 2001. Standardized CPUE for blue sharks caught by Japanese longline fishery in the Atlantic Ocean. ICCAT CVSP Vol. LIV 2002, SCRS/2001/083 12pp. NAKANO, H. and M. Honma. 1996. Historical CPUE of pelagic sharks caught by the Japanese longlinefishery in the Atlantic Ocean. ICCAT CVSP Vol. XLVI (4):393-398. SAS Institute. 1996. SAS/STAT Software, Changes and enhancements. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA. 1094pp. SHIODE, D. and H. Nakano. 2001. Verification of shark catch data of the logbook records in Japanese longline fishery in comparison with the observer reports. Document submitted to the Shark data preparation meeting of ICCAT. STRASBURG, D.W. 1958. Distribution, abundance, and habits of pelagic sharks in the central Pacific Ocean. Fish. Bull. U.S. Fish. Wildlife Serv. 58:335-361. TANIUCHI, T. 1990. The role of Elasmobranchs in Japanese fisheries. NOAA Tech. Rep. NMFS 90: 415-426. WITZELL, W.N. 1985. The incidental capture of sharks in the Atlantic United States Fishery Conservation Zone by the Japanese tuna longline fleet. NOAA Tech. Rep. NMFS 31:21-22. 1129

Table 1. Number of observations which has more than 70% reporting category by geographical unit in each year. Year North South Overall 1971 1609 1506 3115 1972 637 636 1273 1973 688 850 1538 1974 1194 459 1653 1975 1126 518 1644 1976 951 63 1014 1977 577 362 939 1978 517 284 801 1979 83 364 447 1980 307 428 735 1981 422 487 909 1982 353 1162 1515 1983 476 232 708 1984 657 1241 1898 1985 757 1439 2196 1986 290 1190 1480 1987 697 1038 1735 1988 689 953 1642 1989 734 1970 2704 1990 522 1815 2337 1991 573 2228 2801 1992 881 1065 1946 1993 1094 1968 3062 1994 1657 3422 5079 1995 1994 2290 4284 1996 1385 1956 3341 1997 930 1371 2301 1998 2380 1351 3731 1999 1018 1246 2264 2000 1392 800 2192 2001 1273 545 1818 2002 953 452 1405 2003 788 422 1210 Total 29604 36113 65717 1130

Table 2. Outputs of Type III analysis for the models selected in each unit. North Atlantic: Test of Fixed Effects Type III Type III Effect NDF DDF Chi-Sq F Value Pr > ChiSq Pr > F Ord F YR 32 3.00E+04 3132.34 97.89 <.0001 <.0001 0 QT 3 3.00E+04 157.41 52.47 <.0001 <.0001 0 area 4 3.00E+04 235.19 58.8 <.0001 <.0001 0 br 2 3.00E+04 210.75 105.38 <.0001 <.0001 0 QT*area 12 3.00E+04 258.67 21.56 <.0001 <.0001 0 QT*br 6 3.00E+04 135.15 22.53 <.0001 <.0001 0 South Atlantic: Test of Fixed Effects Type III Type III Effect NDF DDF Chi-Sq F Value Pr > ChiSq Pr > F Ord F YR 32 3.60E+04 3748.89 117.15 <.0001 <.0001 0 QT 3 3.60E+04 24.05 8.02 <.0001 <.0001 0 area 3 3.60E+04 159.42 53.14 <.0001 <.0001 0 br 2 3.60E+04 70.25 35.12 <.0001 <.0001 0 QT*area 9 3.60E+04 36 4 <.0001 <.0001 0.0001 QT*br 6 3.60E+04 213.39 35.57 <.0001 <.0001 0 Overall Atlantic: Test of Fixed Effects Type III Type III Effect NDF DDF Chi-Sq F Value Pr > ChiSq Pr > F Ord F YR 32 6.60E+04 4122.06 128.81 <.0001 <.0001 0 QT 3 6.60E+04 92.59 30.86 <.0001 <.0001 0 area 8 6.60E+04 518.85 64.86 <.0001 <.0001 0 br 2 6.60E+04 219.58 109.79 <.0001 <.0001 0 QT*area 24 6.60E+04 374.85 15.62 <.0001 <.0001 0 QT*br 6 6.60E+04 357.74 59.62 <.0001 <.0001 0 NDF is the numerator degrees of freedom, and DDF is the denominator degrees of freedom. 1131

Table 3. Annual, standardized CPUE from the models selected in each unit. Year CPUE Lower Upper CPUE Lower Upper CPUE Lower Upper 1971 0.839 0.795 0.886 1.085 1.016 1.158 0.933 0.895 0.973 1972 1.149 1.057 1.249 0.938 0.862 1.020 1.008 0.950 1.070 1973 1.023 0.946 1.107 1.268 1.174 1.370 1.094 1.036 1.156 1974 1.864 1.751 1.984 1.132 1.029 1.245 1.578 1.496 1.663 1975 1.214 1.134 1.299 0.817 0.746 0.895 1.043 0.987 1.101 1976 0.883 0.824 0.945 0.920 0.730 1.160 0.862 0.808 0.920 1977 1.606 1.474 1.750 4.050 3.644 4.501 2.217 2.073 2.371 1978 1.696 1.548 1.858 2.136 1.898 2.403 1.792 1.667 1.927 1979 1.374 1.100 1.716 6.215 5.594 6.905 4.504 4.093 4.956 1980 2.695 2.402 3.024 4.916 4.472 5.403 3.778 3.509 4.067 1981 2.443 2.213 2.696 0.960 0.877 1.050 1.482 1.386 1.584 1982 1.724 1.549 1.919 2.227 2.088 2.374 2.009 1.904 2.120 1983 1.482 1.352 1.624 1.880 1.661 2.129 1.566 1.453 1.687 1984 0.976 0.901 1.056 2.049 1.924 2.181 1.562 1.488 1.640 1985 1.029 0.953 1.111 1.700 1.603 1.803 1.391 1.329 1.456 1986 2.062 1.834 2.318 1.852 1.738 1.973 1.796 1.701 1.897 1987 1.581 1.464 1.708 2.716 2.544 2.901 2.104 2.002 2.212 1988 1.086 1.006 1.173 1.724 1.610 1.847 1.372 1.303 1.444 1989 1.272 1.181 1.370 1.667 1.583 1.755 1.509 1.449 1.571 1990 1.280 1.172 1.398 1.746 1.655 1.843 1.623 1.554 1.695 1991 1.048 0.963 1.140 1.655 1.573 1.740 1.513 1.453 1.575 1992 1.750 1.634 1.874 1.655 1.552 1.765 1.708 1.630 1.790 1993 2.318 2.176 2.469 1.716 1.627 1.810 1.921 1.847 1.998 1994 2.486 2.363 2.616 1.786 1.707 1.869 2.016 1.952 2.081 1995 2.121 2.025 2.221 1.336 1.269 1.406 1.690 1.633 1.748 1996 2.307 2.185 2.437 1.187 1.125 1.252 1.584 1.526 1.644 1997 1.850 1.730 1.978 1.304 1.228 1.384 1.535 1.468 1.604 1998 1.658 1.589 1.730 1.334 1.257 1.415 1.529 1.476 1.585 1999 1.337 1.255 1.423 1.430 1.344 1.521 1.414 1.354 1.477 2000 1.026 0.971 1.084 1.712 1.591 1.844 1.211 1.158 1.267 2001 1.223 1.156 1.293 1.261 1.158 1.372 1.237 1.179 1.298 2002 1.007 0.943 1.076 1.103 1.006 1.211 1.062 1.006 1.122 2003 1.114 1.034 1.201 1.131 1.028 1.245 1.114 1.050 1.181 1132

Figure 1. Area classification used for the analysis. 1133

4 Blue shark standardized CPUE in the north Altantic Standardized CPUE 3 2 1 0 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 Year CPUE upper 95% lower 95% 7 Blue shark standardized CPUE in the south Altantic 6 Standardized CPUE 5 4 3 2 1 0 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 Year CPUE upper 95% lower 95% 5 Blue shark standardized CPUE in the all over Altantic Standardized CPUE 4 3 2 1 0 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 Year CPUE Upper 95% Lower 95% Figure 2. Standardized shark CPUE and 95% confidence intervals based on the logbook data of Japanese longline fishery in the Atlantic Ocean. 1134