Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Procedia Engineering 60 ( 2013 ) 157 162 6 th Asia-Pacific Congress on Sports Technology (APCST) Influence of material properties and garment composition on pressure generated by sport compression garments Olga Troynikov a*, Wiah Wardiningsih a, Andrey Koptug b, Chris Watson a, Luca Oggiano c, a* a RMIT University, School of Fashion and Textiles, RMIT University, 25 Dawson Street, Brunswick 3056, Australia b Department of Engineering and Sustainable Development, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden c Dept. of Energy and Process Engineering, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology,N-7491 Trondheim, Norway Received 20 March 2013; revised 6 May 2013; accepted 9 May 2013 Abstract Sports compression garments (SCG) have been used by athletes for years as means of enhancement of their performance and speed of recovery. In this research, the investigation into the effects the physical attributes of suitable materials and their composition and orientation in SCG have upon the amount and distribution of pressure generated to the underlying body was undertaken. Two different knitted fabrics suitable for compression sport garment with different physical properties and elastic performance attributes were chosen. Experimental fabric sleeves were assembled, so that they provided different fabric strains around the circumference of the different diameter of cylinders they were placed on. The pressure generated by sleeves was measured using Salzmann pressure-measuring device MST MK IV and Salzmann MST 2007 software. It was determined that different material composition of fabric assemblies influenced the pressure delivery of garment. However no clear relationship between the fabric percentage in assembly composition and the generated pressure was established. 2013 The Published Authors. by Published Elsevier by Ltd. Elsevier Selection Ltd. Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license. and peer-review under responsibility of RMIT University Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, RMIT University Keywords : compression garment; pressure distribution; sportswear; pressure measurements * Corresponding author. Tel.: +61 3 9925 9108 E-mail address: olga.troynikov@rmit.edu.au. 1877-7058 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license. Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, RMIT University doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.07.054
158 Olga Troynikov et al. / Procedia Engineering 60 ( 2013 ) 157 162 1. Introduction Sports compression garments (SCG) have been used by athletes for years as means of enhancement of their performance and speed of recovery [1,2,3].The majority of commercial branded garments currently available for sport applications are claimed to provide the wearer with enhanced blood flow, better muscle oxygenation, reduced fatigue, faster recovery, reduced muscle oscillation and reduced muscle injury [1]. SCGs are becoming increasingly popular for use in a multitude of sporting activities due to their claimed positive attributes for all age groups. The degree of pressure produced by a compression garment is determined by a complex interrelation between the following principle factors: the construction and fit of the garment, structure and physical properties of its materials, the size and shape of the part of the body to which it is applied and the nature of the sporting activity undertaken [1].Many styles of SCGs exist, including stockings (knee length, thigh length), sleeves, upper-body garments (covering the torso and the upper limbs in full or part) and lowerbody garments (from the waist, covering the lower limbs in full or part). The functionality of SCG is claimed to be improved through various garment design and engineering factors, especially through incorporation of musclefor example Conditio -X and others. In addition the compression have the aerodynamic advantage of reducing the frontal area and thus the total drag [5]. Often these suits are composed of different high-modulus elastic fabrics of different physical performance attributes. However there is a lack of systematic research capable of linking the positive attributes of the SCGs to the material properties and chosen design patterns in the inhomogeneous cases. In present research, the investigation into the effects the physical attributes of materials and their composition and orientation in SCG have upon the amount and distribution of pressure generated to the underlying body was undertaken. It aimed to empirically predict the magnitude and distribution of pressure that can be applied to a cylindrical body of known radius by generating specific amounts of strain to an external fabric cover comprising of materials of varying physical properties and elastic performance attributes. This paper addresses the experimental issues related to measuring the distribution of pressure exerted by the fabric and the influence of tensile properties of experimental knitted fabrics and their material assemblies with their different orientations to stretch upon the distribution and magnitude of the pressure generated by them on a cylindrical body. 2. Materials and methods Two different knitted fabrics suitable for compression sport garment with different physical properties and elastic attributes were chosen. For tensile test, 30 cm x 5 cm samples with different composition of fabrics A and B in course direction were prepared in strip formation (Table 1). The fabrics were joined by three thread cover stitch. Fabric sleeves were made of different combination of fabrics A and B (Table 2). Fabric sleeves were of the dimensions providing 25%, 50% and 75% strain around the circumference of the cylinders of 90, 130 and 160 mm in diameter when positioned over cylinders. Fabric sleeves were 500 mm in length and of the width required for each strain, plus 20 mm for seam allowance where they were sewn along their length. All fabrics and sleeves were conditioned and tested in standard temperature atmosphere of 20 ±2 C and 65 ±2% relative humidity, as per AS 2001.1-1995 (AS 1995). Samples composed of fabrics A and B in strip formation were tested for determination of strain at specified force in course directions. The tensile test was conducted according to British Standard BS EN 14704-1:2005, using Instron Tensile Tester.
Olga Troynikov et al. / Procedia Engineering 60 ( 2013 ) 157 162 159 Table 1. Samples composition in course direction Table 2. Sleeves composition Composition Fabric A Fabric B Sleeves Fabric A % Fabric B % % % S0 0 100 C0 0 100 S1 25 75 C1 25 75 S2 50 50 C2 50 50 S3 75 25 C3 75 25 S4 100 0 C4 100 0 The pressure generated by sleeves was measured using Salzmann pressure-measuring device MST MK IV and Salzmann MST 2007 software [6]. The measurement was conducted on the cylinders with -measuring device MST MK IV was calibrated before use by placing weights on the pressure probes, and measuring the pressure as a function of the weight applied. The measurement on the cylinder was conducted as follows: the cylinder was positioned vertically on its holder so that the cylinder did not move. The sensor used was the short sensor of 330 mm with 4 measuring points. The sleeve was positioned on the cylinder over the Salzmann sensor. The sleeve fabric was spread evenly so there was no fold, kink and air bag between the cylinder, sensor and the fabric. The result could be read on the MST and on the software. The measurement of pressure induced by the sleeve on the cylinder was repeated. The result was analysed using descriptive statistical methods. One-way analysis of variance was performed to determine if there were statistically significant differences among the level means. The null hypothesis (H0) for the test is that all population means (level means) are the same. The alternative hypothesis was that one or more population means differ from the others. The independent variables are sleeves with different compositions and strains, while the dependent variables are pressure. 3. Results and discussion The test results of physical properties of fabric used in this study are given in Table 3 and the elongation of fabrics at 25 N forces was given in Table 4. The result of MST Salzmann calibration test result was given in Table 5. Table 3. Fabrics properties Table 4. Stress and strain of samples in course direction Fabric A Fabric B Composition Stress (N) Strain (mm) Fiber composition Nylon 80 : Nylon 80 : C0 25 153.22 (%) Elastane 20 Elastane 20 C1 25 145.76 Mass (g/m 2 ) 225 190 C2 25 146.07 Courses/cm 22 24 C3 25 140.19 Wales/cm 26 26 C4 25 147.22 Thickness (mm) 69.3 65.5
160 Olga Troynikov et al. / Procedia Engineering 60 ( 2013 ) 157 162 Table 5. MST Salzmann calibration result Point of measurement Pressure on 25.4 g (mmhg) Pressure on 45 g (mmhg) b 4.8 7.6 b1 5.0 7.8 c 4.7 7.9 d 4.6 7.9 f 4.5 7.4 g 4.0 6.0 average 4.6 7.43 St dev 0.340 0.728 Figure 1 shows the generated interfacial pressure by sleeves of different material composition in three different cylinder diameters. It could be seen that every composition of sleeves generated different pressure delivery. The result of analysis of variance test could be seen at table 6. Almost all one way analysis of variance test resulted in the decision to reject H0 (p Value < 0.05) which means that the sleeves with different composition generated different pressure delivery. Pressure delivery of sleeves of different material on cylinder 95% CI for the Mean 12 10 Pressure (mmhg) 8 6 4 2 0 S0 S1 S2 S3 S4 S0 S1 S2 S3 S4 S0 S1 S2 S3 C1 130 MM 25% 160 MM 25% 90 MM 25% S4 Fig. 1. Pressure delivery of different composition of sleeves on different cylinder diameters From the tensile test result, it could be seen that the strip with different composition has different elongation. The statistical results showed that the average of C0-C4 was different. So that when these different composition fabrics formed into sleeves and positioned over a cylinder, they were expected to generate different pressure on the underlying cylinder. From the pressure measurement, it is evident that the sleeves of different compositions resulted in different generated pressure. This was confirmed with result of one way analysis of variance. However, as can be seen from figure 1, there was no clear relationship between the percentage of sleeve composition
Olga Troynikov et al. / Procedia Engineering 60 ( 2013 ) 157 162 161 and the generated pressure, as the pressure result did not exhibit a similar trend. The generated pressure of sleeves on 90 mm cylinder had the similar trend with the generated pressure of sleeves on 160 mm cylinder however, it had different trend with the pressure delivery of sleeves in 130 mm cylinder. Table 6. Analysis of variance test No Samples Test Responses P Value Decision Post Hoc Test - LSD 1 C0-C4 Analysis of variance Strain 0.000 Reject H0 Significantly different 2 S0-S4 90mm 25% Analysis of variance Pressure 0.021 Reject H0 Significantly different 3 S0-S4 160mm 25% Analysis of variance Pressure 0.006 Reject H0 Significantly different 4 S0-S4 130mm 25% Analysis of variance Pressure 0.192 Accept H0 Significantly different 5 S0-S4 130mm 50% Analysis of variance Pressure 0.000 Reject H0 Significantly different 6 S0-S4 130mm 75% Analysis of variance Pressure 0.071 Accept H0 Significantly different Figure 2 demonstrates the pressure delivery of sleeves of different material compositions in three different fabric strains on a 130mm cylinder. It could be seen that every composition of sleeves generated different pressure, but there was no clear relationship between percentage of composition and the amount of generated pressure. From this figure however, it could be seen that as the strain of the sleeves increased, the pressure also increased. Pressure delivery of different materials composition of sleeve with different strain 95% CI for the Mean 14 12 Pressure (mmhg) 10 8 6 4 2 0 S0 S1 S2 S3 S4 S0 S1 S2 S3 S4 S0 S1 S2 S3 C1 130 MM 25% 130 MM 50% 130 MM 75% S4 Fig. 2. Pressure delivery of different strain of sleeves on different composition on cylinder
162 Olga Troynikov et al. / Procedia Engineering 60 ( 2013 ) 157 162 No clear relationship between percentage of fabrics composition and generated pressure was established possibly due to the elastic or the tensile properties of the fabrics were not substantially different, despite being statistically different. It could also probably be due to the instrument that was used to measure the pressure, being not sensitive enough and to the presence of possible interfacial pressure variation along the cylinder circumference. As the pressure-measuring device MST MK IV used [6] is not suitable for the measurements of the distribution of interfacial pressure, along with the other known commercial [6-7] and purpose-made devices [8] it does not detect these possible variations. Majority of devices currently in use were designed for medical applications, and are not at all suitable for the measurements of interface pressure distribution (for example, [6, 7]). The demands to the interface pressure measurement methods coming from the medical applications favour the sensors with relatively large sensing area (ca 5 cm 2 t that the local pressure distribution will be 7]. This clearly leads to the need in development of the devices providing both the necessary pressure measurement resolution and ability in measurement of the pressure distribution over larger sensing areas. 4. Conclusions Different material composition of comprising fabric influenced the generated interfacial pressure by fabric sleeves. The pressure generated by the sleeve formed from two fabrics with different attributes was different from the pressure generated by sleeves of the single constituent material. There is no clear relationship between percentages of material composition with the pressure delivery generated, probably because the elastic attributes of the experimental fabrics at the specified force were not considerably different, and the equipment used to measure the generated pressure in this study was not very suitable for the measurement of the distribution of interfacial pressure. References [1] Troynikov, 0, Ashayeri, E, Burton, M, Subic, A, Alam, F and Marteau, S. Factors influencing the effectiveness of compression garments used in sports. 8th Conference of the International Sports Engineering Association (ISEA), Procedia Engineering 2; 2010, pp. 2823 2829 [2] Nusser, M and Senner, V. High - Tech - Textiles in Competition Sports. 8th Conference of the International Sports Engineering Association (ISEA), Procedia Engineering 2; 2010, pp. 2845 2850 [3] Dascombe, B, Osbourne, M, Humphries, B and Reaburn, P. The physiological and performance effects of lower-body compression garments in high-performance cyclists. 2008, viewed 3 April 2012, [4] Liu, R & Little, T. The 5Ps Model to Optimize Compression Athletic Wear Comfort in Sports. Journal of Fiber Bioengineering and Informatics ; 2009, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 41-52. [5] Oggiano, L. and L. Sætran. Experimental analysis on parameters affecting drag force on speed skaters. Sports Technology 2012; 3(4): 223-234. [6] Online: http://www.salzmann-group.ch/images/mesh/prospekte_mkiv_-d-e-f-i.pdf, viewed 23 March 2013 [7] Partsch H, Clark M, Bassez S, Benigni J-P, Becker F, Caprini J, Cornu Thénard A, Hafner J, Flour M, Jünger M, Moffatt C, Neumann M. Measurement of Lower Leg Compression In Vivo: Recommendations for the Performance of Measurements of Interface Pressure and Stiffness. [8] Wu T. Compression Bandage Pressure Measurement. Master of Sciene Thesis. University of Dundee, 2003