White-tailed Deer Age Report from the Deer Harvest

Similar documents
Implementing a Successful Deer Management Program. Kip Adams Certified Wildlife Biologist Dir. of Ed. & Outreach Quality Deer Management Association

ALTERNATIVE DEER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR GAME MANAGEMENT UNITS. 12A, 12B, 13A, 13B, 16A, 45A, 45B, 45C, and White-tailed Deer Units

DEER HUNT RESULTS ON ALABAMA WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREAS ANNUAL REPORT, CHRISTOPHER W. COOK STUDY LEADER MAY, 2006

IN PROGRESS BIG GAME HARVEST REPORTS FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH Energy and Resource Development

CHARLES H. WILLEY PHOTO. 8 November/December 2006 WILDLIFE JOURNAL

NEW YORK STATE WHITETAIL MANAGEMENT COALITION, INC. PO Box 191,Grahamsville, New York

Life history Food Distribution Management... 98

MANAGED LANDS DEER PERMITS WHITE-TAILED DEER PROGRAM INFORMATION General Information

PREDATOR CONTROL AND DEER MANAGEMENT: AN EAST TEXAS PERSPECTIVE

LEAPS BOUNDS. Growing up hunting as a kid in New Hampshire, I didn t. by Dan Bergeron

BIG GAME SEASON STRUCTURE

Black Bear Quota Recommendations CR 17-13

Monitoring Population Trends of White-tailed Deer in Minnesota Marrett Grund, Farmland Wildlife Populations and Research Group

Analyzing your Buck s Antler Characteristics (For Antler Restrictions)

DMU 082 Wayne County Deer Management Unit

Full summaries of all proposed rule changes, including DMU boundary descriptions, are included in the additional background material.

FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT

Deer Management Unit 152

DEER AND ELK POPULATION STATUS AND HARVEST STRUCTURE IN WESTERN NORTH AMERICA: A SUMMARY OF STATE AND PROVINCIAL STATUS SURVEYS.

Deer Management Unit 252

SPOTLIGHT DEER SURVEY YO RANCHLANDS LANDOWNERS ASSOCIATION ±10,400 ACRES KERR COUNTY

Report to the Joint Standing Committee on Inland Fisheries and Wildlife

DMU 038 Jackson County

DMU 056 Midland County Deer Management Unit

FIVE YEAR BIG GAME SEASON STRUCTURE DRAFT DATES FOR

Kansas Deer Report Seasons

AN ASSESSMENT OF NEW JERSEY DEER HUNTER OPINION ON EXPANDING ANTLER POINT RESTRICTION (APR) REGULATIONS IN DEER MANAGEMENT ZONES 28, 30, 31, 34 AND 47

Survey Techniques For White-tailed Deer. Mickey Hellickson, PhD Orion Wildlife Management

5/DMU 069 Otsego County Deer Management Unit

DMU 005 Antrim County Deer Management Unit

EVALUATING THE ACCURACY OF AGES OBTAINED BY TWO METHODS FOR MONTANA UNGULATES

2010 BIG GAME AND FURBEARER HARVEST RECORD FOR THE FOND DU LAC RESERVATION AND CEDED TERRITORIES

DMU 024 Emmet County Deer Management Unit

Interpreting Deer Harvest Records

Recommendations for Pennsylvania's Deer Management Program and The 2010 Deer Hunting Season

2009 BIG GAME AND FURBEARER HARVEST RECORD FOR THE FOND DU LAC RESERVATION AND CEDED TERRITORIES

DMU 006 Arenac County Deer Management Unit

Howell Woods Orientation and Safety Open Book Test

2018 Antlerless Harvest and Youth Season Recommendation

2007 BIG GAME AND FURBEARER HARVEST RECORD FOR THE FOND DU LAC RESERVATION AND CEDED TERRITORIES

Record of a Sixteen-year-old White-tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in Carbondale, Illinois: a Brief Note.

DMU 047 Livingston County Deer Management Unit

White-Tailed Deer Management FAQ

Mountain Goat Horns Of The Kootenay Region Of British Columbia

DMU 073 Saginaw County Deer Management Unit

Making Sense of Selective Buck Harvest

Central Hills Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G9 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

2008 WMU 106 mule deer

Archery Gun Muzzleloader Total Bull Cow Bull Cow Bull Cow Bull Cow

RANCHING Wildlife. Texas White-Tailed Deer 2017 Hunting Forecast

A Hunter's ~uide to Aging and. judging Live white-tailed Deer in the southeast

Agriculture Zone Winter Replicate Count 2007/08

NORTH DAKOTA STATE REPORT June 2016

Northwest Parkland-Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G7 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

1) Increase the deer population to 475,000 (mule, 150,000;

2008 & 2009 Big Game Hunting Regulations Proposal Information

Hunt ID: 3071-UT-G-L A-MDeer-IC4ELLOMONT-RCS-R3YJER

Mule Deer. Dennis D. Austin. Published by Utah State University Press. For additional information about this book

Teton County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, For the Wyoming Wildlife Federation. David T. Taylor & Thomas Foulke

make people aware of the department s actions for improving the deer population monitoring system,

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE HARVEST MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR HUNTING SEASONS

Enclosed, please find the 2018 Spotlight Deer Survey Report and Recommendations that we have prepared for your review and records.

DMU 361 Fremont Deer Management Unit Newaygo, Oceana, N. Muskegon Counties

BY DAN BERGERON ROGER IRWIN. 8 November/December 2013

Quality Deer Management and Prescribed Fire Natural Partners in Wildlife and Habitat Conservation

Big Game Season Structure, Background and Context

2017 LATE WINTER CLASSIFICATION OF NORTHERN YELLOWSTONE ELK

Cariboo-Chilcotin (Region 5) Mule Deer: Frequently Asked Questions

DMU 045 Leelanau County Deer Management Unit

Fremont County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, 2015

SUMMARY REPORT Managed Archery Program Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania. Submitted by Dr. Anthony J. DeNicola White Buffalo Inc.

2010 Wildlife Management Unit 501 moose and deer

EXHIBIT C. Chronic Wasting Disease

DMU 046 Lenawee County Deer Management Unit

Carbon County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, 2015

Northern Yellowstone Cooperative Wildlife Working Group 2012 Annual Report (October 1, 2012-September 30, 2012) Member Agencies

DMU 040 Kalkaska County Deer Management Unit

Mountain Goat Gender Identification Guide

2010 Zone 3 Deer Season Recommendations

Deer Management Unit 122

New Changes to the Managed Lands Deer Program (MLDP)

MANITOBA'S ABORIGINAL COMMUNITY: A 2001 TO 2026 POPULATION & DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE

CHECKS AND BALANCES. OVERVIEW Students become managers of a herd of animals in a paper-pencil, discussionbased

Archery Public Advisory Committee (ARPAC)

USDA APHIS WILDLIFE SERVICES ACTIVITIES SUMMARY REPORT 2013 WHITE-TAILED DEER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TOWNSHIP OF UPPER ST. CLAIR (September 2013)

Wildlife Ad Awareness & Attitudes Survey 2015

DMU 008 Barry County Deer Management Unit

Management History of the Edwards Plateau

2010 Wildlife Management Unit 510 moose

TRAPPING HARVEST STATISTICS. Division of Fish and Wildlife 500 Lafayette Road, Box 20 Saint Paul, MN (651)

2009 WMU 527 Moose, Mule Deer, and White tailed Deer

Deer Census - How to Use It to Calculate Harvest

WILDLIFE HARVEST SUMMARY

Deer Management Unit 127

ALABAMA HUNTING SURVEY

Deer Management in Maryland. Brian Eyler Deer Project Leader Maryland DNR

2017 DEER HUNTING FORECAST

DMU 332 Huron, Sanilac and Tuscola Counties Deer Management Unit

Deer Season Report

2015 Florida Black Bear Hunt Summary Report

Transcription:

White-tailed Deer Age Report from the 2016 Deer Harvest The Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department has made a concerted effort, beginning in 2015, to increase the amount of age data collected from harvested bucks. This is part of the ongoing Comprehensive Deer Management Evaluation, which will continue through the 2017 deer hunting seasons. During this time, the Department will continue to review current deer management strategies. Additional data on deer ages and antler development will help evaluate concerns related to the antler point restriction and allow for comparisons among different regions of the state. This report summarizes the results of cementum aging conducted on 4,600 white-tailed deer harvested during the 2016 youth and rifle seasons in Vermont. Harvest age structure, body weight, and antler size can vary from year to year; therefore, it is not appropriate to draw conclusions from these data alone. This summary is presented, without interpretation, for informational purposes. Lists of individual deer ages by wildlife management unit (WMU) and town are provided in Appendix A. Cementum Aging Deer ages in this report were obtained via cementum aging performed by Matson s Laboratory, LLC, Manhattan, MT. This technique involves sectioning the root of the deer s central incisor, staining it, and counting the annual growth rings (just like the growth rings in a tree). The rings are laid down in the winter, and therefore tend to be more distinct in animals from northern regions of North America. Matson s reported accuracy for northern white-tailed deer is 95%. When deer are aged incorrectly, nearly all will be within one year of their actual age. Human error does occasionally occur, and teeth may get mixed up, but we believe this is also rare. Youth Season Youth season is an important data collection period because youth hunters may harvest any deer regardless of sex, age, or antler characteristics. Therefore, this season provides biological information on the entire deer population, not just legal-antlered bucks. The Department operated 25 biological reporting stations during the youth season and examined a total of 578 deer (39% of the youth season harvest). This included 225 adult does, 244 antlered bucks, and 109 fawns. Yearlings accounted for 71% of the antlered bucks examined, while 24% were 2 years old and 5% were 3 years old or older (Figure 1). Adult does tend to live much longer than bucks due primarily to lower hunting pressure, and that is reflected in the adult female age structure (Figure 2). The oldest doe was 17 years old and was harvested in the town of Barton. 1

Percent of Harvest Percent of Harvest 8 7 6 5 4 3 1 2 3 4 5 Figure 1. Age composition of the adult buck harvest during the youth season. Data are from 243 deer examined by Department staff at biological reporting stations. 25% 15% 5% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Figure 2. Age composition of the adult doe harvest during the youth season. Data are from 224 deer examined by Department staff at biological reporting stations. 2

Percent of Harvest Rifle Season The Department operated 23 biological reporting stations during the opening weekend of rifle season and examined 1,271 antlered bucks (16% of the rifle harvest). The Department also asked all successful rifle season hunters to provide a tooth from their deer. This effort resulted in an additional 2,769 teeth, representing about 36% of the rifle harvest and 43% of the deer that weren t examined by biologists. In total, the Department was able to obtain accurate ages for 3,904 bucks harvested during the rifle season (5 of the rifle season harvest; some teeth were broken and could not be aged). Age Composition of the Harvest The antler point restriction protects most yearlings and some 2-year old bucks from harvest, so this age distribution is not representative of the deer population. It does, however, provide good information on the ages of deer that most hunters can legally harvest. Statewide, 34% of the rifle season harvest consisted of yearlings, 46% were 2 years old, 13% were 3 years old, and 7% were 4 years old or older (Figure 3). The oldest bucks were 12 years old and were harvested in the towns of Brownington and Brattleboro. These were the oldest bucks ever documented in Vermont. Harvest age composition did vary among WMUs (Table 1). A list of individual deer ages by wildlife management unit (WMU) and town is provided in Appendix A. 5 45% 4 35% 3 25% 15% 5% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Figure 3. Age composition of the rifle season harvest. Data are from deer examined by Department staff at biological reporting stations and teeth submitted by hunters (n = 3,904). 3

Table 1. Age composition of the rifle season harvest by Wildlife Management Unit. Sample Size 1 Age WMU n (%) 1 2 3 4 A 50 (41%) 64% 28% 8% B 340 (36%) 32% 54% 11% 4% C 125 (37%) 3 47% 15% 7% D1 328 (6) 35% 44% 14% 6% D2 159 (53%) 41% 38% 14% 8% E1 95 (77%) 37% 29% 13% 21% E2 36 (52%) 39% 22% 11% 28% F1 139 (59%) 45% 46% 7% 2% F2 163 (61%) 41% 48% 9% 2% G 106 (42%) 22% 5 14% 14% H 207 (51%) 28% 44% 9% I 119 (47%) 26% 45% 19% J1 311 (63%) 31% 5 11% 9% J2 311 (43%) 32% 5 12% 7% K 361 (56%) 23% 59% 14% 3% L 57 (24%) 25% 46% 23% 7% M 87 (38%) 34% 43% 14% 9% N 364 (66%) 38% 45% 12% 5% O 282 (53%) 45% 4 5% P 154 (62%) 36% 4 14% Q 110 (48%) 33% 45% 15% 8% STATE 3904 (5) 34% 46% 13% 7% 1 Sample size shows the number of deer that were aged by cementum annuli analysis and the percentage of the total rifle season harvest in that WMU. Body Size and Antler Development Body weight increased until 6 years old, when it peaked at around 190 pounds (field dressed; Figure 4). However, there was considerable variation within age classes. For example, body weight of 2-year-olds ranged from 89 pounds to 215 pounds. Number of antler points followed a similar pattern to body weight, increasing steadily until age 3 and leveling off after age 4 at 8 points (Figure 5). Again, there was considerable variation within each age class. 4

Antler Points Weight 250 200 150 100 50 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7+ Figure 4. Field-dressed body weight of adult bucks harvested during the 2016 youth and rifle seasons. Data for 1 and 2-year-old deer are from youth season only because many deer in these age classes are not legal during the rifle season. The dotted line represents the median body weight for each age class, boxes show the middle 5 of deer, and the whiskers show the minimum and maximum weights. 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7+ Figure 5. Total antler points on adult bucks harvested during the 2016 youth and rifle seasons. Data for 1 and 2-year-old deer are from youth season only because many deer in these age classes are not legal during the rifle season. The dotted line represents the median antler points for each age class, boxes show the middle 5 of deer, and the whiskers show the minimum and maximum number of points. 5