CoastaZ Engineering. Technical Note AIRBORNE COASTAL CURRENT EVALUATION SURVEY SYSTEM

Similar documents
Coastal Engineering Technical Note

STOPPING THE UNDERWATER DIVER THREAT

Sentry de-brief summaries 2011/2012

ATON System Workshop

South Bay Coastal Ocean Observing System California Clean Beaches Initiative

Saab Seaeye Cougar XT Compact

RAMSTM. 360 Riser and Anchor-Chain Integrity Monitoring for FPSOs

SeaSmart. Jonathan Evans

Sontek RiverSurveyor Test Plan Prepared by David S. Mueller, OSW February 20, 2004

ROV Development ROV Function. ROV Crew Navigation IRATECH SUB SYSTEMS 2010

BUYER S GUIDE AQUAlogger 530WTD

CHAPTER 91 TRACKED VEHICLE FOR CONTINUOUS NEARSHORE PROFILES. Richard J. Seymour* Alan L. Higgins** David P. Bothman***

Currents measurements in the coast of Montevideo, Uruguay

Wade Reynolds 1 Frank Young 1,2 Peter Gibbings 1,2. University of Southern Queensland Toowoomba 4350 AUSTRALIA

Dive Operations Plan for Personal Submersibles. Revision

Data Collection and Processing: Elwha Estuary Survey, February 2013

MOTUS Wave Buoys. Powered By the Aanderaa MOTUS Directional Wave Sensor

CB-40 Data Buoy Quick Start Guide

Deploying the TCM-1 Tilt Current Meter in an Inverted (Hanging) Orientation By: Nick Lowell, Founder & President

- TD 262b OPERATING MANUAL PRODUCT XXXX Date February 2013 OPERATING MANUAL SEAGUARD RCM

A Wind Profiling Platform for Offshore Wind Measurements and Assessment. Presenter: Mark Blaseckie AXYS Technologies Inc.

MAPCO2 Buoy Metadata Report Project Title:

High Ping Rate Profile Water Mode 12

Technical Note AN EMPIRICAL. METHOD FOR DESIGN OF BREAKWATERS AS SHORE PROTECTION STRUCTURES

BUYER S GUIDE AQUAlogger 520

The Evolution of an Autonomous Unmanned Surface Vessel and Software for Hydrographic Survey

AANDERAA. Measuring: Current Speed Current Direction Temperature

7.4 Temperature, Salinity and Currents in Jamaica Bay

Surface Rescue Swimmer School. Primary Rescue Devices and Procedures LT 4.3

Comparison of Predicted and Measured Shoaling at Morro Bay Harbor Entrance, California

Nearshore Dredged Material Placement Pilot Study at Noyo Harbor, CA

TRIAXYS Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler Comparison Study

Beach Wizard: Development of an Operational Nowcast, Short-Term Forecast System for Nearshore Hydrodynamics and Bathymetric Evolution

High Definition Laser Scanning (HDS) Underwater Acoustic Imaging and Profiling

SEASONDE DETECTION OF TSUNAMI WAVES

Using AUVs in Under-Ice Scientific Missions

Appendix 5: Currents in Minas Basin. (Oceans Ltd. 2009)

OPERATIONS SEAFARER CERTIFICATION GUIDANCE NOTE SA MARITIME QUALIFICATIONS CODE. Deck: Chart Work

COMPARISON OF DEEP-WATER ADCP AND NDBC BUOY MEASUREMENTS TO HINDCAST PARAMETERS. William R. Dally and Daniel A. Osiecki

LX Compass module 3 Electronic compass device User manual

Mini-Pro CO2 Sensor User s Manual - ANALOG MODEL -

Overview. 2 Module 13: Advanced Data Processing

Isis Deployment. TMS and Live Boating. Inmartech08. Dave Turner Operations Co-ordinator.

Compiled by Uwe Dornbusch. Edited by Cherith Moses

"Real-Time Vertical Temperature, and Velocity Profiles from a Wave Glider"

Ultrasonic Fuel Level Sensor - UFLS

Undertow - Zonation of Flow in Broken Wave Bores

USE OF SEGMENTED OFFSHORE BREAKWATERS FOR BEACH EROSION CONTROL

WAVE BREAKING AND DISSIPATION IN THE NEARSHORE

MEASUREMENT COMMUNICATION INSIGHT

LEADER SEARCH RADAR LIFE LOCATOR

THE CHALLENGES OF A LARGE-AREA BATHYMETRIC SURVEY

Interim Operating Procedures for SonTek RiverSurveyor M9/S5

AltMoC SPO.SPEC.HESLO.100 Standard Operating Procedures

Coastal Wave Energy Dissipation: Observations and Modeling

Volume and Shoreline Changes along Pinellas County Beaches during Tropical Storm Debby

ScanFish Katria. Intelligent wide-sweep ROTV for magnetometer surveys

Pioneer Array Micro-siting Public Input Process Frequently Asked Questions

Mechanisms and Characteristics of High-Speed Reef Rip Current

DQM Annual Hopper QA Checks

SEAEYE FALCON & FALCON DR

Challenges in determining water surface in airborne LiDAR topobathymetry. Amar Nayegandhi, Dewberry 15 th Annual JALBTCX Workshop, June 11 th 2014

The GCOOS Mooring Plan Element Draft, 19 February 2011

An IOOS Operational Wave Observation Plan Supported by NOAA IOOS Program & USACE

Seventeenth Coast Guard District Auxiliary Policy Directive 01-07

Ocean Observatories Initiative. Coastal & Global Scale Nodes. Hydrogen Safety. OOI Surface Mooring Hydrogen Safety Review

Comparisons of Physical and Numerical Model Wave Predictions with Prototype Data at Morro Bay Harbor Entrance, California

The below identified patent application is available for licensing. Requests for information should be addressed to:

Improve Process Reliability

Sonar Bathymetry: Waquoit Bay NERR

Air-Sea Interaction Spar Buoy Systems

Ocean Observatories Initiative (OOI) Moorings: New Capabilities for Seagoing Science

Wave-Current Interaction in Coastal Inlets and River Mouths

Marine Towed Array Surveys of Ostrich Bay, Lake Erie and Puerto Rico.

Table of Contents 1 Introduction 2 Technical specifications 3 Included in the delivery 4 Function description 5 Mounting Nortek AOS buoy

OUTLINE SHEET 4.3 PRIMARY RESCUE DEVICES AND PROCEDURES Explain the functional operation of the following Rescue Devices per NTTP 3-50.

Viva TPS. TS11/15 Total Stations Check and Adjust Procedure. October Summary

A real time vessel air gap monitoring system

Malta Survey activities

INTERNATIONAL HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEY STANDARDS

Figure 1 Location of the ANDRILL SMS 2006 mooring site labeled ADCP1 above.

CLIENT NAME: LOCATION: CALM BUOY INSPECTION:

Seismic Survey Designs for Converted Waves

A review of best practices for Selection, Installation, Operation and Maintenance of Gas meters for Flare Applications used for Managing facility

MOOS IvP Helm Based Simulations of Collision Avoidance by an Autonomous Surface Craft Performing Repeat-Transect Oceanographic Surveys

sorting solutions osx separator series

DUXBURY WAVE MODELING STUDY

CROSS-SHORE SEDIMENT PROCESSES

Real Time Surveying GPS and HYDRO Software for Tide and Swell Compensation

8. Decompression Procedures Diver

Moor, Tend Mooring And Unmoor Ship - Supervisor Level -

EVALUATION OF BEACH EROSION UP-DRIFT OF TIDAL INLETS IN SOUTHWEST AND CENTRAL FLORIDA, USA. Mohamed A. Dabees 1 and Brett D.

Wind Flow Validation Summary

Well, Well, Well. BACKGROUND Seasonal upwelling is a very important process in the coastal ocean of the Pacific Northwest.

14/10/2013' Bathymetric Survey. egm502 seafloor mapping

Geo-Vibro Corer

CLAM PASS ANNUAL RESTORATION & MANAGEMENT PLAN TIDAL ANALYSIS ELEMENT REPORT NO. 13

Appendix E Cat Island Borrow Area Analysis

frequently asked questions

Evaluation of the Klein HydroChart 3500 Interferometric Bathymetry Sonar for NOAA Sea Floor Mapping

Transcription:

CETN VI-25 (Dee 92) CoastaZ Engineering Technical Note AIRBORNE COASTAL CURRENT EVALUATION SURVEY SYSTEM PURPOSE: This Technical Note introduces a new method for collecting current measurements at multiple locations in a localized region over a short period of time. This new method can provide qualitative spatial resolution of bottom current patterns and canbe operated near structures, inhigh energy regimes, and in shallow or quickly changing bathymetry. BACKGROUND: In order to better understand coastal'processes and evaluate or predict the effect of placing a structure in the nearshore, current patterns need to be examined. Dye studies are valuable in delineating only surface or nearsurface currents. Prior to development of the Airborne Coastal Current Evaluation Survey System (ACCESS), spatial resolution of bottom current patterns required placement of an entire suite of instruments to blanket an area and collect data simultaneously. Often this stationary bottom current acquisition technique was ruled out because of the enormous expense associatedwith placement and maintenance of the large array of meters. Another option is to use several boats end instruments to collect this data, but boats are often limited by bathymetry, wave and current conditions, or inability to navigate about structures. The ACCESS technique may be applicable to many situations where these limitations have previously prevented collection of current information. Initial deployments of ACCESS used an S-4 InterOcean Inc. electromagnetic current meter, suspended by cable from a helicopter to measure currents at several locations within a short period of time.to create a qualitative mosaic of local current patterns. This technique was developed at the Coastal Engineering Research Center (CERC) as part of the Monitoring of Completed Coastal Projects (MCCP) research program's Siuslaw River, Oregon project. The helicopter was selected as the work platform because of its ability to quickly transit between measurement sites and to operate in high energy, nearshore zones and around structures. The S-4 current meter was selected because an electromagnetic current meter has no moving part to foul, its compact size, and its built-in ability to measure depth and direction. The S4 -can store data internally or transmit signals to a remote computer. Additional sensors provide salinity and temperature. EOUIPMENT: The helicopter for ACCESS applications must be large and powerful enough to accommodate a pilot and a co-pilot, a winch person, and the-current meter string and anchor weight. If remote real-time display of data is required, a computer and operator must also be accommodated. The helicopter must have a side-mounted power winch with sufficient power and lift capability to raise and lower the meter and its anchor weight. Fuel capacity of the aircraft and the pay load weight will establish the time limit between refueling. The number of sampling sites can also vary greatly depending upon distance to the study location and the distance between sampling sites. US Army Engineer Waterways Expertment Station. Coastal Engineermg Research Center 3909 Halls Ferry Road. Vicksburg. Misslsslppl 39180-6199

The s-4 electromagnetic current meter is a multi-parameter meter capable of measuring both depth and current velocity. It has an on-board magnetic compass and tilt sensors used to compensate for gage orientation. It is capable of recording data internally as well as passing it to an external computer. The current meter is connected to an anchor made up of 4 lead balls weighing 200 lbs in total and moored to the lower eye of the instrument approximately one meter below the instrument housing. A sub-surface buoy providing 30 lbs of lift is rigged approximately one meter above the instrument to keep it suspended and vertical in the water column. The four lead balls together create a foot print not easily rolled or moved on the seabed, once disassemble can be easily handle by a single person. The one-meter between components distance minimizes interference with the S4 meter operation. More weight and buoyancy may be necessary in swifter currents. A copper wire weighted with a 5 lb bag weight is attached to the bottom of the current meter string to dissipate static charge developed by the helicopter. The meter assembly is shackled to the helicopter's rescue winch for raising and lowering to the sea floor. A separate electrical umbilical married with a 3/8 inch support line connects the instrument through an RS232 interface to an on-board Zenith laptop computer powered by a 12 volt battery. This line is not intended to support the weight of the instrument string, and is tended by hand as the instrument is lifted in and out of the water. Figure 1 shows the S-4 meter string and computer assembly. Figure 2 illustrates the meter assembly as it would appear attached to the helicopter and in use at the sea floor. Data is collected and stored internally within the S-4 and externally in the computer. The computer is used for two reasons. First, it provides a backup data record in case the instrument becomes fouled and has to be released. Second, the effects of static electricity generated by the helicopter are.- unpredictable and the data stream can be monitored to insure that the instrument is providing quality data. In the event that the equipment must be released, all lines to the helicopter and computer are equipped with quick releases. Great care should be taken to coil the electrical line in a fashion so that it can be jettisoned as a unit without endangering the aircraft, crew, or mission. A surface buoy attached to the end of the electrical umbilical support line is included to aid in relocation and recovery of the current meter string. During data collection, horizontal positioning of the helicopter is accomplished in two ways. Line of sight positioning by the pilot to range markers on the beach, jetties, or both is used for approximate positioning and to speed up the maneuvering process. Accurate position coordinates are achieved by sighting prisms mounted on the helicopter with a Total Electronic Positioning Station located onshore. METHOD: During operation, the helicopter pilot aligns the aircraft with the range poles. Distance from the poles is radioed to the pilot by the survey crew on land using the Total Station. Once in position the current meter string is lowered until the weights rest on the sea floor and the exact location of the helicopter is recorded. The helicopter must hover directly over the meter while current vector information and instrument depth is recorded at a two-hertz frequency. Sampling times vary with site and study objective: one minute is typical. A second position measurement is taken by the survey crew at the end of the interval. After the second position is recorded the helicopter lifts the meter string from the water and moves along a line of sight to the next 2

CETN VI-25 (Dee 92).I (_N_ 1m I s-110 laphe* Figure 1. S-4 meter string and computer assembly Figure 2. Meter assembly as it would appear in use at the sea floor. 3

measurement site, and the procedure is repeated. Figure 3 illustrates this data acquisition sequence. The helicopter pilot judges the distance between the site locations and keeps on line using the range markers. The survey crew only provides location instruction to the helicopter crew if they deviate greatly from survey or if the distance between site locations is not consistent with project requirements. While it is necessary to know the helicopters position at the time of sampling, for most applications it is not necessary to precisely position the helicopter at a designated location. This would require several minutes, significantly decreasing the number of sites that canbe surveyedwithinthe fuel time limit of the helicopter. Site selections should consider bathymetry, previous dye studies, tracer studies, photos, model study results and any other available information concerning currents in the area. A grid pattern is helpful for aligning the helicopter during the study and also insures uniform coverage of sampling sites in the study area; Selection of the sampling interval at each site is balancing two conflicting needs: rapid sampling to increase spatial resolution and measuring to obtain a sample of the site. One minute (approximately 6 wave periods) was selected to yield the best balance of the two needs. Allowing one minute for sampling and 4 minutes for helicopter maneuvering, a new site can be sampled approximately every 5 minutes, averaging 18 sites per 1.5 hour period. DATA PRESENTATION: The S-4 meter records data continuously. The measurement time series can be correlated with location by comparison with the position time series from the survey instrument. The sampling period when the meter is on the seabed is easily identified from the depth output. Real time is used to correlate current data collection intervals with helicopter position. The one minute of data is averaged into a single resultant current vector for each site and the resultant vectors are displayed inmosaic form. The origin of the vector coincides with the data collection location and the length andhead of the vector indicate relative speed and direction of the current at the time of sampling. In effect, the ACCESS creates a 1.5 hour time exposure snapshot of currents in a localized region. By conducting several 1.5 hour ACCESS studies, over a tidal cycle and under differing wave conditions, a comprehensive view of current pattern trends in a localized area can be achieved and at a fraction of the cost associated with a large scale current meter deployment effort. Examnle: ACCESS was successfully tested at the Siuslaw River, Oregon at a cost of 35 thousand dollars for mobilization, demobilization and three days of current sampling. Its goal was to aid in documentation of current patterns around spur jetties constructed at the Siuslaw River mouth. Dauphin Rescue Helicopters supplied by the US Coast Guard were used for the Siuslaw River ACCESS Study. For the Siuslaw River, where the helipad is located very near the study site, helicopter pay load limits for personnel and equipment used in this study allowed the helicopter to be in the air between 1.5 and 1.75 hours before refueling. A fuel truck supplied with Jet "A" fuel mixed with "Prist" and anti-ice, antifungus agent was contracted for the study period to remove the need for the helicopter to return to its home base 60 miles from the study area for refueling. Survey crew and total station were positioned on the jetties. Range poles on the beach and marker on the jetties formed the line of sight grid for helicopter

a 1. Helicopter is directed to measurement station 7. Lift instrument clear of water a d proceed to next s?a tion II PI I ql,\ 6. Manuever over instrument and lift from bottom Second postion taken Figure 3. Sequence of helicopter positioning and data collection.

positioning. Figure 4 shows the jetty configuration and the proposed measurement sites locations and grid formation for the study at Siuslaw River. Figure 5 is an example mosaic presentation of currents vectors at 22 locations where measurements were made north of the Siuslaw jetties during a 1.5 hour sampling period. Wind patterns through out the study period were from due north at times exceeding 30 knots, current patterns reflect wind dominated current patterns for this 1.5 hour period. Summarv: ACCESS is and effective method for obtaining qualitative spatial resolution of bottom currents in hostile environments where boat operation is prohibitive and at a fraction of the cost of large scale current meter deployment efforts.... t OREGDN. PROPOSED PROFILE SITES I I II 00 317000 317500 318000 c. 500 STATE PLANE COORDINATES (meters) Figure 4. Proposed grid for Siuslaw River ACCESS Study. 6

CETN-VI-25 December 1992 Figure 5. Actual sampling locations at Siuslaw River ACCESS Study. ADDITION INFORMATION: For further information, contact Ms. Cheryl E. Pollock at (601) 634-4029, Cheryl.E.Pollock@erdc.usace.army.mil. REFERENCES: Burke, Cheryl E., 1990, "Helicopter Current Study at Siuslaw River, Florence, Oregon," The CERCular, Vol CERC-90-2, June 1990. 7