Scoping and Design Considerations for APS and ADA Curb Ramps. Adam Tyra, PE INDOT Greenfield District Traffic

Similar documents
Design Overview. Section 4 Standard Plans for Design. Pedestrian Access Routes. Pedestrian Access Routes. Overview. Cross Slope

Scenarios. The following slides will show existing pictures that deny access, followed by a retrofitted picture that provides access.

Preparing a Curb Ramp Project. December 15, 2010

CHAPTER 8 STAKING SIGNALS AND LIGHTING FIELD GUIDE. 8.1 Staking Traffic Control Signal Systems

ADA Training Accessible Pedestrian Signal (APS) 2018 MnDOT

What Is a Complete Street?

ADA PRESENTATION (CURB RAMPS)

STAKING TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEMS

RC-67M has been updated to include more details to be consistent with both ADAAG and PROWAG. The following slides discusses the general notes found

Designing Accessible Traffic Signals

Paul Vraney Bureau of Project Development 02/11/2016

ADA Technical Frequently Asked Questions

DISTRIBUTION: Electronic Recipients List TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (17-01) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. MANUAL: Road Design English Manual

NJDOT Complete Streets Checklist

ADA Operations Contact Info

Department of Public Works Office of Disability Affairs February 23, 2017 Presented by Mark Zwoyer, PE

Americans with Disabilities Act Indiana Transition Plan. Louis E. Feagans Jr. PE Statewide Technical Service Director, Indiana DOT

Standards vs. Guidelines. Public Right-of Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG)

PEDESTRIAN ACCOMMODATIONS DPS 201 AT INTERCHANGES

Designing Pedestrian Facilities for Accessibility. Module 3 Curb Ramps & Blended Transitions

Americans with Disabilities Act and Curb Ramps

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE

C. Brian Shamburger, P.E., PTOE Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. State of Texas Registered Firm #928

Steps to Conducting a Complete Streets Assessment

ADA TRANSITION PLAN 2013

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

Typical Cross Section: DOWNTOWN (Observer Highway - 8th Street)

SRTS IMPLEMENTATION COSTS

St. Francis Drive through the City of Santa Fe Corridor Study

ADA Operations Contact Info

ADA Design Overview. Section 2. ADA Design Overview. Pedestrian Access Routes. Pedestrian Access Routes. Overview

Hennepin County Pedestrian Plan Public Comment Report

A. Arlington County Master Transportation Plan Pedestrian Element B. Arlington County Horizontal Standards H-3.1 Driveway Entrances

ADA & Public Rights of Way

2014 FHWA Aging Road User Handbook. Recommendations to Accommodate Aging Pedestrians. Lifesaver National Conference. What is the Handbook?

Retrofitting Urban Arterials into Complete Streets

City of East Grand Forks. ADA Transition Plan. Inventory Manual. June, 2018 DRAFT

Pedestrian Safety at Interchanges

Defining Purpose and Need

SCOPE Application, Design, Operations,

Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety at Alternative Intersections and Interchanges

MEMORANDUM. Discussion of the planned crosswalk improvement on Mount Vernon Road near Stratham Drive

Complete Streets and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Jennifer E. Ruley, PE Active Transportation Engineer Louisiana Public Health Institute

Designing Traffic Signals by Jeffrey W. Buckholz, PhD, PE, PTOE A SunCam online continuing education course DESIGNING TRAFFIC SIGNALS

Bridgewater Complete Streets Prioritization Plan and Pedestrian Safety Assessment

Complete Streets Design Considerations. Second Street Corridor Complete Streets Workshop and Assessment Manchester, NH April 26, 2013

Question: How does your state accommodate pedestrian pushbutton pole placement vs. ramp location and reach? State Contact Response Alabama Alaska

Designing for Individuals who are visually impaired or blind

ROADWAY AND PARKING DETAILS TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL NOT TO SCALE

ADA Training Standard Plans

Truck Turning Study for Main Street Intersection, Orange

Town of Bourbon. Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan: Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way

This is the title of the proposed project. A CIP contract or project number will be assigned to the projects as funding is established.

ROUNDABOUTS. Improving Safety and Efficiency. SR83 & Smithville Western Rd. Joel Montgomery, PE Director of Administration

About the Studio. Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy - Rutgers University

CURBSIDE ACTIVITY DESIGN

PROCEDURE FOR ACCOMMODATING PEDESTRIANS IN WORK ZONES FOR CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE

Poor pavement condition Substandard Intersections. / Substandard bike/pedestrian/transit accommodations. Driveway access Environmental concerns

USDOT Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Assessment Gary, Indiana April 16, 2015

Prince George s County plans, policies, and projects

Curb Ramp Guidelines. October Version 1.0

Pedestrians and Bicyclists. Bruce Friedman and Scott Wainwright FHWA MUTCD Team

INDEX. Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads INDEX

Walk Friendly Communities Engineering Strategies. Carl Sundstrom Walk Friendly Communities Workshop Grandview, MO June 2015

This page intentionally left blank.

DESIGN CRITERIA DIVISION 4900 TRAFFIC SIGNALS

Morristown, NJ Complete Streets Policy

S.R. 3009, Section A20 South Park & Logan Road Intersection Improvement Project

Field guide for Accessible Public Rights-of-Way Edition

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

Route 47 (North Main Street) Reconstruction

Field guide for Accessible Public Rights-of-Way Edition

Balancing Operation & Safety for Motorized and Non-Motorized Traffic

Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan for Public Right-of-Way Improvements

Off-road Trails. Guidance

City and County of San Francisco APS Safety & Access Tool. Cover Sheet. Total score = crosswalk worksheet score + intersection worksheet score

ADA TRANSITION PLAN. For

ACTION TRANSMITTAL No

Derby Street. Project Updates. Salem, Massachusetts

CHAPTER 16 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

Designing for the Visually Impaired

Accessible Sidewalk Requirements

Improvements Infrastructure Gap Assessment and Improvements Street Striping

ADA Transition Plan. City of Gainesville FY19-FY28. Date: November 5, Prepared by: City Of Gainesville Department of Mobility

IMPLEMENTATION WORKBOOK

Field Design, Construction and inspection of ADA compliant Curb ramps. Mike Anderson City of Lee s Summit Construction Manager (816)

SD Highway 50 in Yankton (4 TH Street) Reconstruction Project NH 0050(99)381 PCN By Josh Larson McLaury Engineering Inc.

Midtown Rail Station Accessibility Assessment N4

Non-Motorized Transportation 7-1

Designing Pedestrian Facilities for Accessibility. Module 8 Maintenance of Pedestrian Facilities and Alternate Pedestrian Access Routes in Work Zones

MEMORANDUM. Date: 9/13/2016. Citywide Crosswalk Policy

Option W: N. Washington Street Project

Roadway Design Manual

CITY OF LANCASTER PROPOSED NEW PROJECTS

GIS Based Data Collection / Network Planning On a City Scale. Healthy Communities Active Transportation Workshop, Cleveland, Ohio May 10, 2011

Transportation Planning Division

Town of Wakarusa. Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan: Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way

Community Meeting February 27, 2007 Dorchester Avenue Transportation & Streetscape Improvements Action Plan February 27, 2007

TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM: SELECTED PROJECTS AND FUNDING ALLOCATIONS

PEDESTRIAN CROSSING TREATMENTS

Transcription:

Scoping and Design Considerations for APS and ADA Curb Ramps Adam Tyra, PE INDOT Greenfield District Traffic

Background and Perspective Scoping and Asset Management for traffic signals for INDOT s Greenfield District Caveat: other DOTs and local gov ts may have different needs or requirements This presentation will provide items that need to be considered in scoping and design. If these are not considered early on, it could lead to Scope changes Project delays Cost overruns Sub-standard final products Maintenance Capital Programs (CPM) Systems Successful Scope

Need for Pedestrian Facilities No ramps if: No sidewalk or No accessible paved area (such as a parking lot) on a corner and It is not a refuge between two diagonal corners No pedestrian heads or pushbuttons if: No curb ramps or sidewalk on BOTH corners of a potential crossing Where feasible, pedestrians should be proactively accommodated, especially at those locations that are likely to be used by people with disabilities (such as hospitals, government buildings, and elderly communities).

Example: US 40 & Apple St, Greenfield, IN Aerial: Google Maps

Example: US 40 & Apple St, Greenfield, IN Northwest and Southwest corners have existing pedestrian facilities (sidewalk and trail) Should be brought up to current standards for pedestrian-related improvements, if necessary Aerial: Google Maps

Example: US 40 & Apple St, Greenfield, IN Southeast corner has no sidewalk or other paved area to tie into and Therefore, should not have pedestrian improvements if sidewalks would not be built prior to/during project construction Aerial: Google Maps

Example: US 40 & Apple St, Greenfield, IN Northeast corner has a paved parking lot. Could be considered for a ramp and other pedestrian improvements for crossing to northwest corner based on: Likely pedestrian need Local Feedback Right-of-way Business owner s desires Aerial: Google Maps

Curb Ramps: Things to Look For Geometric Narrow sidewalks, possibly with buildings close to the curb line Significant elevation change either along profile or between road and sidewalk Curbs that have been mounted by vehicles regularly (tire tread marks) Poor drainage and water ponding in ramp (anecdotal or visual evidence) Large radii can make achieving an ideal ramp very difficult Historic District or Features (brick sidewalks, limestone curbs) Some projects that should include curb ramps (based on policy) do not necessarily have the budget or time in the schedule to acquire R/W Just because a ramp has raised domes (detectable warning surface) and other features you would find in modern ramps does not mean that it is necessarily up to current standards. Conversely, adding a detectable warning surface may be sufficient

Examples of Difficult Curb Ramp Sites Elevation Possibly R/W and proximity to building Might be eligible for a technical infeasibility finding Photo: Doug Corey (INDOT)

Examples of Difficult Curb Ramp Sites Elevation Proximity to building Potential drainage issue once a curb ramp is installed Fitting both ramps in such close proximity Photo: Doug Corey (INDOT)

Examples of Difficult Curb Ramp Sites Large radius Sidewalk stops abruptly Ground slope could be a concern if the ramp needs to be much larger to line it up crosswalk Possible drainage issues Slight tread marks Photo: Doug Corey (INDOT)

Examples of Difficult Curb Ramp Sites Drainage appears to be an issue R/W is possibly going to be an issue with the parking lot Photo: Doug Corey (INDOT)

Examples of Difficult Curb Ramp Sites Up to current standards? Check slopes Extend detectable warning surface to edge of curb ramp (grass) Heavy Tire Marks Photo: Doug Corey (INDOT)

Don t Forget to Look Up for Drainage Concerns Photo: Unknown

Pedestrian Signal: Things to Look For Equipment Old, obsolete, or damaged cabinet Not enough spare load bays Conduits full/damaged Controller is obsolete If physical space on the shelves are limited or full with detector racks or other equipment Placement Lack of R/W Utilities near ramps Close and unobstructed path to the push button (pedestrian clear space) Heads do not necessarily need to be on the same pedestal or pole as the push button.

Cabinet Sizes Size R G P M Dimensions (HxWxD) 78 x44 x27 40 x24 x17 55 x44 x27 51 x30 x18 Photo: Adam Tyra (INDOT)

Cabinet Sizes G cabinets (upside down here) Pole-mounted cabinets Were used in urban areas Rare for INDOT at this point and being phased out due to age, size, and inventory Size and compatibility would almost certainly necessitate replacement Size R G P M Dimensions (HxWxD) 78 x44 x27 40 x24 x17 55 x44 x27 51 x30 x18 Photo: Adam Tyra (INDOT)

Cabinet Sizes M cabinets Second-most common size cabinet for INDOT Typically found in urban areas with limited R/W Shelf space can be limited Option for a stretch M that fits on an M foundation, but with extra shelf space Size R G P M Dimensions (HxWxD) 78 x44 x27 40 x24 x17 55 x44 x27 51 x30 x18 Photo: Adam Tyra (INDOT)

Cabinet Sizes P cabinets Are the most common size of cabinet for INDOT, especially in non-urban settings Cabinet size might only be an issue if many other things are run through the cabinet such as ITS or two signals at a single cabinet Can retrofit an M foundation with a P or R if either the larger cabinet or more conduits are needed Size R G P M Dimensions (HxWxD) 78 x44 x27 40 x24 x17 55 x44 x27 51 x30 x18 Photo: Adam Tyra (INDOT)

Cabinet Sizes R cabinets Largest size cabinet for INDOT Fits on a P foundation Rarely used, only needed if there is lots of equipment Size R G P M Dimensions (HxWxD) 78 x44 x27 40 x24 x17 55 x44 x27 51 x30 x18 Photo: Adam Tyra (INDOT)

Cabinet Interior Things to look out for NEMA TS-1 cabinet vs NEMA TS-2 (no BIUs generally means it is a TS-1) Older style controller Adequate number of spare load switch bays (1/ped crossing phase) Shelf space Adequate empty conduit space Photo: Unknown (INDOT)

Cabinet Interior (Before & After) US 40 & Broadway St (2013) M-Size Cabinet TS-2 (has BIUs) Econolite ASC2 Controller 4 of 8 load switch bays used Difficult to see from picture, but the conduits are very full Photo: Unknown (INDOT)

Cabinet Interior (Before & After) US 40 & Broadway St (2018) P-Size Cabinet TS-2 (has BIUs) Econolite ASC3 Controller 8 of 16 load switch bays used Separate APS control box Excess space in the conduit Photos: Adam Tyra (INDOT)

Wiring 5c/14 for each pedestrian head 1 Spare 1 Ground 2 for Walk/Don t Walk 1 for Countdown Timer 3c/14 for each push button 1 Spare 1 Ground 1 for Push Activation Can combine to a single 9c/14 Notes on Conduit: 60% of the cross-sectional area of the conduit needs to remain empty after construction Spare conduit to first handhole and separate conduit for 3c/8 power

Typical Wiring (US 40 & Broadway in Greenfield, IN) Fiber 4-7c/14 for vehicle signals (1 per phase) 8-7c/14 for pedestrian signals (2 ped heads and push buttons for 4 signalized crossings) 3c/8 for power 4-2c/16 for detection 5 conduits Photo: Adam Tyra (INDOT)

Complicated Wiring (DDI at I-69 & Campus Pkwy) 3c/8 for power 22-2c/16 for detection 8-7c/14 for vehicle heads 8-9c/14 for signalized pedestrian crossings 4-3c/14 for emergency vehicle preemption 8 conduits in foundation Photo: Adam Tyra (INDOT)

Right-of-Way (R/W) Example Corners with curb ramps may or may not have well-recorded R/W Apparent R/W is not necessarily actual R/W Note: this is theoretical, not based on record research at this corner

Right-of-Way (R/W) Example Expected R/W if the back of sidewalk is the boundary

Right-of-Way (R/W) Example Expected R/W if the front of sidewalk is the boundary Also possible R/W wasn t properly recorded, may only own to back of curb

Example: US 35 & SR 931, Kokomo, IN Path not aligned with crosswalk, at a slight skew Push button is too far away (pedestrian clear space) Push button is not the correct type Photos: Google Maps

Example: I-465 & Emerson Ave, Indianapolis, IN Tall Curb resulting in steep grade Sidewalk just turns into shoulder Unsignalized crossing is appropriate for this particular crossing, but there are other similar crossings that can and should be signalized at this interchange Could add a small curb section to discourage pedestrian use of the shoulder that could also serve as a place for a pedestal Photo: Adam Tyra (INDOT)

Thank you. Questions? Adam Tyra, PE Greenfield District Traffic adtyra@indot.in.gov