Iowa DOT FHWA Safety Targets

Similar documents
Des Moines Area MPO Safety Performance Targets and Methodology

PRELIMINARY DRAFT FIRST AMENDMENT TO VISION 2050: A REGIONAL LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN

7/28/2017. Safety Performance Management: Target Setting and Coordination. Agenda. Safety Performance Management (SPM)

Safety Performance Management Target Setting. Data: Fatalities and Serious Injuries

Appendix A: Before-and-After Crash Analysis of a Section of Apalachee Parkway

SAFETY PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND TARGET SETTING. Transportation Subcommittee September 15, 2017

APPENDIX C. Systems Performance Report C-1

National Performance Management Measures. April 20, 2016 Webinar

Analyzing Spatial Patterns, Statistics Based on FAST Act Safety Performance Measures

Characteristics of Traffic Accidents in Highway Work Zones

Florida s Turnpike System Projected Debt Service Coverage Ratio ($000)*

ENGINEERING DRIVER SAFETY INTO PAVEMENT PRESERVATION

Relationship of Road Lane Width to Safety for Urban and Suburban Arterials

What is the problem? Transportation Safety Planning Purdue Road School. 42,636 Fatalities. Nearly 3M Injuries. Over 4M PDO crashes

2016 Annual Report. Work Zone Traffic Control. Bureau of Maintenance and Operations Highway Safety and Traffic Operations Division

Double Pair Comparisons PART III AGE & GENDER. Age and Crash Risk. Subject & control groups Relative risk or rate. Relative Accident Involvement Ratio

Projections of road casualties in Great Britain to 2030

Cyclist Safety in Australia

SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF CRASHES IN LAS CRUCES

TRAFFIC CRASH FACTS FOR CHAMPAIGN-URBANA SELECTED CRASH INTERSECTION LOCATIONS (SCIL)

SAFETY OF OUR STREETS

Collision Estimation and Cost Calculation

Defining Purpose and Need

Turnpike System Projected Debt Service Coverage Ratio ($000)*

CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW

Signalization and Safety. A Study of the Safety Effects of Signalizing Intersections on Colorado State Highways

Lincoln Avenue Road Diet Trial

METHODOLOGY. Signalized Intersection Average Control Delay (sec/veh)

Traffic safety developments in Poland

An Assessment of Potential Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions from Proposed On Street Bikeways

RSTF Measurements and Status

FHWA s Strategic Agenda for Pedestrian and Bicycle Transportation. Purdue Road School March 8, 2017

Copy of my report. Why am I giving this talk. Overview. State highway network

BBS Fall Conference, 16 September Use of modeling & simulation to support the design and analysis of a new dose and regimen finding study

Table of Contents Kansas Highway Safety Improvement Program

Evaluating Road Departure Crashes Using Naturalistic Driving Study Data

Managed Lanes: The Fitch Approach. Saavan Gatfield, Senior Director

2015 Victorian Road Trauma. Analysis of Fatalities and Serious Injuries. Updated 5 May Page 1 of 28. Commercial in Confidence

Geometric Categories as Intersection Safety Evaluation Tools

CASUALTY REVIEW

Review of Fatal Collisions

Policy Management: How data and information impacts the ability to make policy decisions:

DRIVING ZERO FATALITIES TO A REALITY ILLINOIS LOCAL SAFETY INITIATIVE

Bicycle Crashes. Number of Bike Crashes. Total Bike Crashes. are down 21% and severe bike crashes down 8% since 2013 (5 years).

Road Diets: Reconfiguring Streets for Multi-Modal Travel

Roundabout Design 101: Roundabout Capacity Issues

Transportation Infrastructure Systems Needs and Challenges: Progress Report

Analysis of Signalized Intersection Crashes Nasima Bhuiyan, EmelindaM. Parentela and Venkata S. Inapuri

Transportation and Public Works Annual Motor Vehicle Collision Report

Pedestrian and Bicycle Volume Counts Methods and Technologies for Pedestrian and Bicycle Volume Data Collection.

Analysis of the Red Light Camera Program in Garden Grove, CA By Jay Beeber, Executive Director, Safer Streets L.A., Member ITE

Speed Management Action Plan

Safety at Intersections in Oregon A Preliminary Update of Statewide Intersection Crash Rates

THE DEVELOPMENT OF MALAYSIAN HIGHWAY RAIL LEVEL CROSSING SAFETY SYSTEMS: A PROPOSED RESEARCH FRAMEWORK. Siti Zaharah Ishak

CASUALTY REVIEW

ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME DIVISION OF COMMERCIAL FISHERIES NEWS RELEASE

DRAFT MOVING FORWARD RHODE ISLAND BICYCLE MOBILITY PLAN 2018 PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY IN ASSOCIATION WITH

Road Safety Not a one-way street: Exploring the complexity of pedestrian fatalities

Road Diets A Proven Safety Countermeasure

Reducing Fatalities and Serious Injuries on County Roads

Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) 2014 Crash Data Report

Safety Impacts of Road Diets in Iowa

Corridor Advisory Group and Task Force Meeting #10. July 27, 2011

ICES advice on fishing opportunities

Powered Lawn Mower Market in United Kingdom to Market Size, Development, and Forecasts

Cycling Volume Estimation Methods for Safety Analysis

Gray Diversion Study Draft Report

DOT HS September Crash Factors in Intersection-Related Crashes: An On-Scene Perspective

Highway Safety Improvement

NMSU Red Light Camera Study Update

NCTCOG 16-County Crash and Fatality Data

Use of SHRP2 NDS Data to Evaluate Roadway Departure Characteristics

Characteristics of Fatal Pedestrian Crashes on Freeways. Kay Fitzpatrick Texas A&M Transportation Institute

Analyses and statistics on the frequency and the incidence of traffic accidents within Dolj County

INTERSECTION SAFETY RESEARCH IN CRACOW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

SAFETY EFFECTIVENESS OF HIGH-SPEED EXPRESSWAY SIGNALS. Sponsored by the Iowa Department of Transportation Offi ce of Traffic and Safety

Tying Knots. Approximate time: 1-2 days depending on time spent on calculator instructions.

Chapter 12 Practice Test

Performance Measures Target Setting NCTCOG Public Meetings

Colorado Department of Transportation Crash Data Program Alisa Babler, PE

Road Accident Analysis and Identify the black spot location On State Highway-5 (Halol-Godhra Section)

Analysis of Highland Lakes Inflows Using Process Behavior Charts Dr. William McNeese, Ph.D. Revised: Sept. 4,

Growth Trends in Hampton Roads

Saithe (Pollachius virens) in subareas 4 and 6, and in Division 3.a (North Sea, Rockall and West of Scotland, Skagerrak and Kattegat)

ICES Advice on fishing opportunities, catch, and effort Celtic Seas and Greater North Sea Ecoregions Published 24 October 2017

Funding Sources Appendix I. Appendix I. Funding Sources. Virginia Beach Bikeways and Trails Plan 2011 Page I-1

4/27/2016. Introduction

National Roundabout Update

The Impact of Narrow Lane on Safety of the Arterial Roads. Hyeonsup Lim

Toward Zero Deaths: Proactive Steps for Your Community

Pedestrian Accidents in Utah

1 2 I N T R O D U C T I O 6 G E N E R A L I N F O R M A T I O N. Across. 6. Knowledge communicated in a brief overview

Memorandum 1. INTRODUCTION. To: Cc: From: Denise Marshall Northumberland County

Attachment One. Integration of Performance Measures Into the Bryan/College Station MPO FY 2019 FY 2022 Transportation Improvement Program

Lesson 14: Modeling Relationships with a Line

CITY OF FRANKLIN, TENNESSEE. Columbia Avenue. Widening & Improvements Project. Public Meeting May 16, 2017

MULTIMODAL INJURY RISK ANALYSIS OF ROAD USERS AT SIGNALIZED AND NON- SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS

The City of Newark Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety

MONROE COUNTY NEW YORK

VANCOUVER POLICE DEPARTMENT

Transcription:

Iowa DOT FHWA Safety Targets August 2018 In January 2018, the Iowa DOT began the process of reviewing data to set performance targets for the five safety performance measures required by FHWA in 23 CFR 490 (also referred to as PM1 ). For the safety area, these targets are required to be five-year rolling averages and must be set annually. The five required measures are: 1. Number of fatalities 2. Rate of fatalities per 100 million vehicle miles traveled (VMT) 3. Number of serious injuries 4. Rate of serious injuries per 100 million VMT 5. Number of non-motorized fatalities and non-motorized serious injuries These targets must be set as five-year rolling averages for 2015-2019, and will be submitted as part of the State s Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) annual report, due August 31, 2018. The first round of target setting for these measures occurred in 2017, and the same approach was used again in 2018. Because of the relatively short-term nature of the targets, the methodology being utilized focuses on historical information and creates a forecast based on trends. The approach relies on the use of prediction intervals around the trend model forecast to inform a risk-based target setting method. A prediction interval is defined as: In statistical inference, specifically predictive inference, a prediction interval is an estimate of an interval in which future observations will fall, with a certain probability, given what has already been observed. 1 A prediction interval approach enables a focus on the acceptable risk of meeting, or failing to meet a target, which allows stakeholders at all levels of the organization to understand the targets in better context. In 2017, the safety targets working group evaluated several prediction intervals and recommended a prediction interval of 75%, meaning that there would be 75% confidence that the actual number of fatalities and injuries would be lower than the targets. Management agreed with the use of a 75% confidence level. This level is being used again in 2018 for target setting. For each measure, a time-series model was developed. An integrated moving average model was used in both 2017 and 2018. The following pages show the model s output and predictions at various confidence levels for each measure. This helps illustrate the level of risk associated with various confidence levels, as well as the fact that higher confidence levels lead to more conservative targets. The final page shows the 2015-2019 safety targets. The safety data used in the forecast can be obtained from the Iowa Crash Analysis Tool (ICAT) and Motor Vehicle Division daily fatality count from the following URLs: ICAT: https://saver.iowadot.gov/ Fatality Report: https://www.iowadot.gov/mvd/stats/daily.pdf 1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/prediction_interval, 2018-Mar-09 Iowa DOT 2015-2019 PM1 Targets 1 August 31, 2018

1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 Measure 1: Number of Fatalities Figure 1 shows the historical series (black line), the integrated moving average (IMA) model (red line), the model s forecast values (black dots), and a set of prediction interval bounds (blue lines). The blue lines shown in this figure correspond to the 75% confidence level used for targets. Table 1 shows the model s forecast of fatalities for 2018 and 2019 and the upper prediction interval value at different confidence levels. Figure 1: IMA model and forecast for annual fatalities Table 1: Forecast road fatalities and upper prediction values at selected probability levels Year Forecast 70% 75% 80% 85% 97.5% 2018 346 366 372 378 385 420 2019 344 366 372 379 388 427 Figure 2: Fatalities trend and forecast, including prediction interval bounds 600 500 400 300 200 Iowa Road Fatalities Trend and Forecast for 2018-2027 Fatalities 70% 75% 80% 85% 97.5% would be set by using the forecast value of 346 fatalities for 2018 and the 75% PI value of 372 as the 2019 value. The five-year rolling average target is presented in Table 7. Iowa DOT 2015-2019 PM1 Targets 2 August 31, 2018

Measure 2: Fatalities Per Hundred Million Vehicle Miles Traveled This measure is a rate conversion, using the forecast developed for Measure 1 and the estimated VMT for the forecast period. The forecast values of VMT were provided by the Office of Systems Planning using their preferred methodology, linear ETS, which is an exponential smoothing approach. The linear ETS method provides the most reasonable results and adjustment for seasonality or fluctuations in the data. The annual VMT forecasted by this method for 2019 is expected to be 34,653,330,000. Table 2: Fatality rate forecast at selected probability levels Year VMT Forecast Forecast (x100m) Fatality Rate 70% 75% 80% 85% 97.5% 2018 34,209.06 1.0127 1.0704 1.0870 1.1054 1.1269 1.2286 2019 34,653.33 0.9917 1.0561 1.0746 1.0951 1.1190 1.2325 would be set by using the forecast value of 1.0127 fatalities per hundred million VMT for 2018 and the 75% PI value of 1.0746 for 2019 along with the actual rates from 2015-2017. The fiveyear rolling average target is presented in Table 7.. Iowa DOT 2015-2019 PM1 Targets 3 August 31, 2018

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Measure 3: Number of Serious Injuries The figure below shows the historical series (black line), the model (red line), the model s forecast values (black dots), and a set of prediction interval bounds (blue lines) for the number of serious injuries resulting from collisions. In this case, due to a discontinuity between 2000 and 2001, the model is constructed using only data from 2001 and later. Figure 3: IMA model and forecast for serious injuries Table 3: Forecast road serious injuries and upper prediction values at selected probability levels Year Forecast 70% 75% 80% 85% 97.5% 2018 1,463 1,527 1,546 1,566 1,590 1,704 2019 1,406 1,493 1,517 1,545 1,577 1,730 Figure 4: Serious Injuries trend and forecast, including prediction interval bounds 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 Iowa Road Serious Injuries Trend and Forecast for 2018-2027 Major_Injuries 70% 75% 80% 85% 97.5% would be set by using the forecast value of 1,463 for 2018 and the 75% PI value of 1,517 for 2019. The five-year rolling average target is presented in Table 7. Iowa DOT 2015-2019 PM1 Targets 4 August 31, 2018

Measure 4: Serious Injury Rate per Hundred Million Vehicle Miles Traveled This measure is a rate conversion, using the forecast developed for Measure 3 and the estimated VMT for the forecast period. The forecast values of VMT were provided by the Office of Systems Planning using their preferred methodology, linear ETS, which is an exponential smoothing approach. The linear ETS method provides the most reasonable results and adjustment for seasonality or fluctuations in the data. The annual VMT forecasted by this method for 2019 is expected to be 34,653,330,000. Table 4: Serious Injury rate forecast at selected probability levels VMT Forecast Year (x100m) Forecast Serious Injury Rate 70% 75% 80% 85% 97.5% 2018 34,209.06 4.2763 4.4647 4.5186 4.5787 4.6487 4.9804 2019 34,653.33 4.0574 4.3074 4.3790 4.4587 4.5516 4.9920 would be set by using the forecast value of 4.2763 serious injuries per hundred million VMT for 2018 and the 75% PI value of 4.3790 for 2019 along with the actual rates from 2015-2017. The five-year rolling average target is presented in Table 7. Iowa DOT 2015-2019 PM1 Targets 5 August 31, 2018

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Measure 5: Number of Non-Motorized Fatalities & Serious Injuries The figure below shows the historical series (black line), the model (red line), the model s forecast values (black dots), and a set of prediction interval bounds (blue lines) for the number of non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries resulting from collisions with a vehicle. The model is constructed using all available data from 2008 and later. Figure 5: IMA model and forecast for annual non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries Table 5: Forecast non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries, and upper prediction values at selected probability levels Year Forecast 70% 75% 80% 85% 97.5% 2018 148 153 154 156 158 166 2019 147 152 153 155 157 166 Figure 6: Non-Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries trend and forecast, including prediction interval bounds 180 160 140 120 100 Iowa Road Non-Motorized Fatalities & Serious Injuries Trend and Forecast for 2018-2027 152 would be set by using the forecast value of 148 for 2018 and the 75% PI value of 153 for 2019. The five-year rolling average target is presented in Table 7. Iowa DOT 2015-2019 PM1 Targets 6 August 31, 2018

Iowa DOT 2015-2019 Safety Targets While the preceding forecasts were developed for each year, the targets are required to be set as five-year rolling averages, as crashes are subject to significant year-to-year variability. The following table gives the actual numbers of fatalities, serious injuries, non-motorized injuries and fatalities, and the VMT for each respective year, which are the basis for the five year rolling averages presented in Table 7. Table 6: Annual data summary, 2011-2017 Year Fatalities Serious Injuries Non-Motorized Injuries and Fatalities VMT (Million) 2011 360 1,501 157 31,411 2012 365 1,629 147 31,581 2013 317 1,545 138 31,542 2014 322 1,509 126 32,332 2015 320 1,470 153 33,109 2016 402 1,510 165 33,263 2017 329 1,460 150 33,765 Table shows the historical and predicted five-year rolling averages for the five targets. The highlighted numbers represent Iowa s 2015-2019 safety targets. Table 7: Historical 5-year rolling averages, forecast values, and 2015-2019 targets Five-Year Rolling Averages Year Fatalities Non-Motorized Fatalities per Serious Injuries Serious Injuries and hundred million per hundred Injuries Fatalities VMT million VMT 2004-08 427.0 1,995.0 2005-09 423.6 1,883.4 2006-10 411.6 1,794.2 Data not available 2007-11 395.8 1,716.6 Data not available Data not available 2008-12 379.6 1,646.0 150.0 2009-13 360.6 1,586.8 147.6 2010-14 350.8 1,565.6 145.8 2011-15 336.8 1,530.8 144.2 1.053 4.785 2012-16 345.2 1,532.6 145.8 1.067 4.735 2013-17 338.0 1,498.8 146.4 1.027 4.568 Forecast 75% Prediction Interval Value 2014-18 348.8 1,498.6 146.2 1.046 4.497 2015-19 353.6 1,483.7 149.8 1.047 4.391 2016-20 358.5 1,464.0 149.4 1.049 4.284 2017-21 346.3 1,424.3 146.7 0.999 4.113 2018-22 348.3 1,383.2 148.3 0.992 3.944 Iowa DOT 2015-2019 PM1 Targets 7 August 31, 2018