Safety Performance Management Target Setting. Data: Fatalities and Serious Injuries

Similar documents
PRELIMINARY DRAFT FIRST AMENDMENT TO VISION 2050: A REGIONAL LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN

Attachment One. Integration of Performance Measures Into the Bryan/College Station MPO FY 2019 FY 2022 Transportation Improvement Program

National Performance Management Measures. April 20, 2016 Webinar

SAFETY PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND TARGET SETTING. Transportation Subcommittee September 15, 2017

Ongoing Challenges with Pedestrian Safety Data May 15: 10:15AM-11:45AM. PedsCount! 2014 May 14-16, 2014 Sacramento, CA

FHWA s Strategic Agenda for Pedestrian and Bicycle Transportation. Purdue Road School March 8, 2017

Iowa DOT FHWA Safety Targets

7/28/2017. Safety Performance Management: Target Setting and Coordination. Agenda. Safety Performance Management (SPM)

Des Moines Area MPO Safety Performance Targets and Methodology

We believe the following comments and suggestions can help the department meet those goals.

Annual Crash Report. Valdosta-Lowndes County Metropolitan Planning Organization

Toward Zero Deaths: Proactive Steps for Your Community

HSIP Project Selection Criteria

Pedestrian Safety Initiatives National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)

APPENDIX G Lane Departure Action Plan

Toward Zero Deaths. Regional SHSP Road Show Meeting. Virginia Strategic Highway Safety Plan. presented by

Analyzing Spatial Patterns, Statistics Based on FAST Act Safety Performance Measures

Michael D. Turpeau Jr. State Safety Program Supervisor Georgia Department of Transportation

Lane Area Transportation Safety and Security Plan Vulnerable Users Focus Group

Traffic Safety & Community Building: Presented by: Greg Raisman, Portland Bureau of Transportation Active Transportation & Traffic Safety

Highway Safety Improvement

Roadway Safety S.O.G. and Training Outline. Captain Rodney J. Palmer. Oak Creek Fire Department

RSTF Measurements and Status

CENTRAL ARIZONA GOVERNMENTS STRATEGIC TRANSPORTATION SAFETY PLAN FINAL REPORT

SAFETY OF OUR STREETS

FLORIDA STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN

Cyclist Safety in Australia

Minnesota Crash Mapping Analysis Tool (MnCMAT) & Crash Data

Pedestrian Safety and the Highway Safety Improvement Program

the Ministry of Transport is attributed as the source of the material

CASUALTY REVIEW

Characteristics of Traffic Accidents in Highway Work Zones

New Jersey Department of Transportation. Safety Impact Teams. May 22, 2007 Patricia Ott, P. E. Director, Traffic Engineering & Safety

APPENDIX F. Safety Planning. October 2018

How to Develop a Pedestrian Safety Action Plan

Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Road Safety Partnership Handbook

Analyses and statistics on the frequency and the incidence of traffic accidents within Dolj County

Street Smart - Regional Pedestrian Safety Campaign. Hopkins Grand Rounds July 16, 2014

EuroRAP s priorities. Road Safety: no Safe System without forgiving roads

City of Jacksonville Mobility Fee Update

RESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) 2014 Crash Data Report

USDOT Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Initiative: Safer People and Safer Streets. Barbara McCann, USDOT Office of Policy

Safety Data Resources. Multi-Discipline Safety Planning Forum March 10 & 11, 2008 Gateway Center

Work Zone Safety in Oregon

TRAFFIC CRASH FACTS FOR CHAMPAIGN-URBANA SELECTED CRASH INTERSECTION LOCATIONS (SCIL)

The Miami-Dade Safe Routes to School Initiative

SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF CRASHES IN LAS CRUCES

Pedestrian Accidents in Utah

V2X Bicycle and Pedestrian Detection. ITS Wisconsin Annual Conference October 23, 2018

APPENDIX C. Systems Performance Report C-1

NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM. Policy and Procedure. Roswell Department of Transportation (770)

Designing for Pedestrian Safety

8. Collisions INTRODUCTION

Figure 1. Indiana fatal collisions by young driver involvement,

Transportation Safety Planning at DVRPC

How would you like it if people drove their cars thru your office?

CTDOT Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Initiatives

Appendix A: Before-and-After Crash Analysis of a Section of Apalachee Parkway

Bicycle RSAs: How to Conduct Road Safety Audits and How to Use Them to Promote Bicyclist Safety. Dan Nabors, PE, VHB Bill DeSantis, PE, VHB

REDUCING COLLISIONS AT HIGH CRASH LOCATIONS

Pedestrians safety. ROAD SAFETY SEMINAR PIARC/AGEPAR/GRSP Lome, Togo October 2006 Lise Fournier, Canada-Qu

Pedestrian Safety: A Federal Perspective. Emmett McDevitt Transportation Safety Engineer September 28, 2010

Improving the Process: How Statewide Organizations Are Winning Federal Dollars for Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects

Local Road Safety Plans

Transportation and Public Works Annual Motor Vehicle Collision Report

What is the problem? Transportation Safety Planning Purdue Road School. 42,636 Fatalities. Nearly 3M Injuries. Over 4M PDO crashes

Hillsborough Pedestrian Safety Action Plan 2015 Update. Hillsborough MPO BPAC May 2015

Speed Management Action Plan

Strategies. How to Develop a Pedestrian Safety Action Plan Enforcement 6-1

Table of Contents Kansas Highway Safety Improvement Program

Systemic Safety. Doug Bish Traffic Services Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation March 2016

Developing a Local Road Safety Plan. April 9, 2017 Presented by: Nicole Waldheim, Danena Gaines, and Hillary Isebrands

Mission: The mission of FARS is to make vehicle crash information accessible and useful so that traffic safety can be improved

the Ministry of Transport is attributed as the source of the material

Evolving Roadway Design Policies for Walking and Bicycling

SR/CR A1A PEDESTRIAN SAFETY & MOBILITY STUDY RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION

H 232 Bicycle Safety Report

MTCF. Michigan Traffic Crash Facts FACT SHEETS

Pedestrian Issues and Safety Initiatives in Railroad Corridors

the Ministry of Transport is attributed as the source of the material

NYC Pedestrian Safety Study & Action Plan. Research, Implementation & Safety Division of Traffic Operations

The New Federal Transportation Law: What s the Impact on Safe Routes to School?

NCTCOG 16-County Crash and Fatality Data

An Overview of Traffic Records. April 15, 2016 John Riemer

A Strategic Highway Safety Plan. a coordinated and informed approach to reducing highway fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads.

Texas Intersection Safety Implementation Plan Workshop JUNE 2, 2016

Local Road Safety Plans

CASUALTY REVIEW

BIA INDIAN HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM FY2016 LAW ENFORCEMENT OVERTIME GRANT

Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Road Safety Partnership Handbook

MTCF. Michigan Traffic Crash Facts FACT SHEETS

Core Elements of a Roadway Incident Safety Program

Multimodal Design Guidance. October 23, 2018 ITE Fall Meeting

Reducing Fatalities and Serious Injuries on County Roads

Strategies for Making Multimodal Environments Safer. Kim Kolody Silverman, CH2M

Deaths/injuries in motor vehicle crashes per million hours spent travelling, July 2007 June 2011 (All ages) Mode of travel

Services and Funding from WSDOT Local Programs

Safe Access to Transit:

Reducing Speeding-Related Crashes Involving Passenger Vehicles

Transcription:

Safety Performance Management Target Setting Data: Fatalities and Serious Injuries David Adams Georgia DOT Tom Sills CBMPO

Executive Summary Purpose of the Regulatory Action is to clarify the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) (Pub. L. 112-141) and the Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act) (Pub. L. 114-94) continue the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) under section 148, title 23 of the United States Code (U.S.C.) as a core Federal-aid program with the purpose to achieve a significant reduction in fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads.

Final Rule The purpose of this final rule is to incorporate changes to the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) regulations to address provisions in the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) as well as to incorporate clarifications to better explain existing regulatory language. The DOT also considered the HSIP provisions in the Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act) Effective April 14, 2016

Safety Performance Measures Number of Fatalities Rate of Fatalities per 100 million Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Number of Serious Injuries Rate of Serious Injury per 100 Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Number of Non-Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries Using a Unweighted Rolling Five(5) Year Average

Safety Performance Measures

Safety Performance Targets GOHS Georgia Strategic Highway Safety Plan (HSP) NHTSA GDOT Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) FHWA

CRASH FATALITIES

Number of Fatalities Year 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 * 2017 * 2018 Traffic Fatalities 1,495 1,292 1,247 1,226 1,192 1,180 1,164 1,435 1,560 Projected Fatalities 1,884 2,266 Target 1,593

To maintain the 5-year moving average traffic fatalities under the projected 1,593 (2014-2018) 5-year average by December 2018

To maintain the 5-year moving average traffic fatality rate under the projected 1.33 (2014-2018) 5-year average by December 2018

SERIOUS INJURY

Number of Serious Injuries Year 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Traffic Serious Injuries 11,729 12,482 12,483 14,756 15,510 17,040 16,168 19,405 18,900 * 2017 * 2018 Projected Serious Injuries 21,177 22,564 Target 19,643

To maintain the 5-year moving average serious traffic injuries under the projected 19,643 (2014-2018) 5-year average by December 2018

To maintain the 5-year moving average serious traffic injury rate under the projected 16.318 (2014-2018) 5- year average by December 2018

NON-MOTORIZED FATALITIES & SERIOUS INJURIES

Number of Non-Motorized Fatalities & Serious Injuries Year 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Non Motorizes 522 528 664 738 878 866 869 1002 1002 * 2017 * 2018 Projected non Motorized 1116 1231 Target 1027

To maintain the 5-year moving average Non-Motorized Fatalities & Serious Injuries under the projected 1027 (2014-2018) 5-year average by December 2018

DATA LIMITATIONS

Current Definitions GEARS Hospital Variables Injury Class Code Killed Serious Visible Complaint Not Injured Injury Severity Score (ISS) Minor Moderate Serious Severe Critical Maximal

CODES Linked Data Georgia Uniform Vehicle Accident Report Serious Injury Any injury that prevents the injured person from walking, driving, or normally continuing the activities that, that person was capable of performing prior to the accident. Crash Variables Transport Vehicle Damage Vehicle Type Person Type Injury Class Code

MMUCC 4 th Ed. Suspected Serious Injury Definition Severe laceration resulting in exposure of underlying tissues/muscle/organs or resulting in significant loss of blood Broken or distorted extremity (arm or leg) Crush injuries Suspected skull, chest, or abdominal injury other than Significant burns (second and third degree burns over 10% or more of the body) Unconsciousness when taken from the crash scene Paralysis

Serious Traffic-related Injuries Definition All pedestrian and bicycle occupants that were coded as serious All pedestrian and bicycle occupants that were coded as visible and was transport by EMS All other occupants that were coded as serious and transport by EMS 50% of all other occupants that were coded visible, transport by EMS, and damage to vehicle (extensive or fire present)

MPO CONSIDERATIONS

Law Enforcement Software 17 Current Software Providers Training GPSTC Local Training Officer Reporting Electronic Paper None

Defined Boundaries State County Law Enforcement Agency No MPO Boundaries No Electoral Boundaries Historic GIS

MPO Targets MPOs will establish targets for the same five safety performance measures for all public roads in the MPO planning area within 180 days after the State establishes each target. The targets will be established in coordination with the State, to the maximum extent practicable. The MPO can either agree to support the State DOT target or establish a numerical target specific to the MPO planning area. MPOs' targets are reported to the State DOT, which must be able to provide the targets to FHWA, upon request.

MPO Targets States establish HSIP targets and report them for the upcoming calendar year in their HSIP annual report that is due August 31 each year. MPOs must establish HSIP targets within 180 days of the State establishing and reporting its HSIP targets. Since FHWA deems the HSIP reports submitted on August 31, MPOs must establish HSIP targets no later than February 27 of each year.

Target Proposed Safety Targets Safety Performance Measure 1,593 Number of Fatalities 1.33% Rate of Fatalities per 100 million Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) 19,643 Number of Serious Injuries 16.32% Rate of Serious Injury per 100 Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) 1,027 Number of Non-Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries