Rigs-to-reefs in the North Sea: hydroacoustic quantification of fish in the vicinity of a semi-cold platform

Similar documents
HOW BENTHIC HABITATS AND BOTTOM TRAWLING AFFECT TRAIT COMPOSITION IN THE DIET OF EUROPEAN PLAICE (PLEURONECTES PLATESSA) IN THE NORTH SEA

Length and species-dependent diurnal variation of catch rates in the Norwegian Barents Sea bottom-trawl surveys

This paper not to be cited withou..!.-prior reference to the authors. Fish behaviour in relation to long lines observed by TV

Distribution and abundance of Norwegian spring spawning herring during the spawning season in 2006

ICES WGCSE REPORT

Hydroacoustic surveys of Otsego Lake s pelagic fish community,

A Combined Recruitment Index for Demersal Juvenile Cod in NAFO Divisions 3K and 3L

Observing the behavioral response of herring exposed to mid-frequency sonar signals

IMPACT OF HERRING SPAWNING BEHAVIOUR ON ACOUSTIC ABUNDANCE ESTIMATES

LAKE WASHINGTON SOCKEYE SALMON STUDIES. Richard E. Thorne and James J. Dawson

19 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON ACOUSTICS MADRID, 2 7 SEPTEMBER 2007

Size of mackerel in research vessel trawls and commercial purse-seine catches: implications for acoustic estimation of biomass

Fine-Scale Survey of Right and Humpback Whale Prey Abundance and Distribution

Distribution and abundance of Norwegian spring spawning herring during the spawning season in 2007

DEPARTMENT FOR ENVIRONMENT, FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS CEFAS, LOWESTOFT LABORATORY, SUFFOLK, ENGLAND

Hydroacoustic survey of Otsego Lake, 2004

Automatic species recognition, length measurement and weight determination, using the CatchMeter computer vision system.

A. Bjordal and A. B. Skar

ICES Working Group on the assessment of Mackerel, Horse Mackerel, Sardine and Anchovy. Vigo, 5-15 September 2005 Working Document

Why has the cod stock recovered in the North Sea?

Fish reaction to trawling noise: the significance for trawl samplhg

Fast Tracking the Development of Environmental- Friendly Fishing Methods

ICES Advice on fishing opportunities, catch, and effort Celtic Seas Ecoregion Published 30 June 2016

A century of change in a marine fish assemblage. Martin Genner

This paper not to be cited without prior reference to the authors OFF LOFOTEN AND M0RE IN 1984

Haddock, Iceland, ICES Va, Danish Seine

Not to be cited without prior reference to the author

Cruise Report Cruise no. 06NG-06TG. Exploratory investigations on Norwegian spring-spawning herring in the Norwegian Sea November 2006

Comparative Fishing for Flatfish using a Beam Trawl fitted with Electric Ticklers Peter A M Stewart

Institute of Marine Research

Institute of Marine Research

People from FFL: Fróði B. Skúvadal (Cruise leader) and Mourits Mohr Joensen (Technician)

This paper not to be cited without prior reference to the authors

3.4.3 Advice June Barents Sea and Norwegian Sea Cod in Subareas I and II (Norwegian coastal waters cod)

GEAR TECHNOLOGY NOTE - Towed Gear

Tracking herring schools with a high resolution sonar. Variations in horizontal area and relative echo intensity

Distribution and recruitment of demersal cod (ages 0+, 1+ and 2+) in the coastal zone, NAFO Divisions 3K and 3L

Mapping & modelling of winter ichthyoplankton distribution in the Channel & Southern North Sea

The Development of Multi-Rig Trawling Systems in the UK Past, Present and Future?

Can trawling effort be identified from satellite-based VMS data?

SEAFISH ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

Discard matrix. Figures and ICES commentary. Suggested changes that are necessary to comply with legislation. Targeted fishery.

Role of learning in mesh penetration behaviour of haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus)

2.3.1 Advice May Capelin in Subareas V and XIV and Division IIa west of 5 W (Iceland East Greenland Jan Mayen area).

I. Ostrovskyet al., 2008

Gulf of St. Lawrence (4RST) Greenland Halibut

Year Avg. TAC Can Others Totals

SCHEME FOR DISPLAYING FISH POSITION DATA IN REAL TIME. Kenneth G. Foote Institute of Marine Research

Harvest Control Rules in a multispecies world: The Barents Sea and beyond. Daniel Howell IMR Bergen

Investigating Acoustic Anomalies in the Water Column. Alistair Robertshaw, Geohazards Specialist, BP Oceanology 2016

Deep Vision, Shale Rosen, Havforskningsinstituttet

Analyse des interactions entre distributions spatiales des communautés de poisson et des flottilles de pêche

REGULATIONS RELATING TO MESH SIZES, BYCATCHES AND MINIMUM SIZES, ETC., DURING FISHING OPERATIONS IN THE FISHERIES PROTECTION ZONE AROUND SVALBARD

SEA FISHERIES (INSHORE TRAWLING, NETTING AND DREDGING) (JERSEY) REGULATIONS 2001

SEA FISHERIES (INSHORE TRAWLING, NETTING AND DREDGING) (JERSEY) REGULATIONS 2001

DEVELOPMENT OF A HYDROACOUSTIC SURVEY DESIGN TO QUANTIFY PREY FISH ABUNDANCE IN THE MINNESOTA WATERS OF LAKE SUPERIOR

Case study results North Agean purse seine, Kavala, Greece ID

Advice June 2014

UNDERWATER SCIENCE. Multibeam Systems TECHNOLOGY FOR SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES

Atlantic cod, Norwegian Coastal cod, Gillnet

ICES CM 2000/J:10. Svein Løkkeborg Institute of Marine Research, Fish Capture Division, P.O. Box 1870 Nordnes, N-5817 Bergen, Norway

An Overview of Methods for Estimating Absolute Abundance of Red Snapper in the Gulf of Mexico

Trends in Scottish Fish Stocks 2017

BOTTOM MAPPING WITH EM1002 /EM300 /TOPAS Calibration of the Simrad EM300 and EM1002 Multibeam Echo Sounders in the Langryggene calibration area.

Trends in Scottish Fish Stocks 2018

Fine-scale Focal Dtag Behavioral Study of Diel Trends in Activity Budgets and Sound Production of Endangered Baleen Whales in the Gulf of Maine

This paper not to be cited without prior reference to the author. Fish beahaviour studies as an aid to cod and haddock longline hook design.

Small pelagic fishery and research in Albania

NAFO/ICES PANDALUS ASSESSMENT GROUP MEETING OCTOBER An overview of Norwegian investigations of the shrimp stock off East Greenland in

In ocean evaluation of low frequency active sonar systems

SIZE-SELECTION OF MACKEREL AND SAITHE IN PURSE SEINE

(Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

This paper not to be cited without prior reference to the author~ International Council for the Exploration of the Sea

Qualark Creek. Split-beam system. History. Using split-beam technology. Single beam system (fish finder) What is a Sonar (Hydroacoustic) system?

The stock of blue whiting has been surveyed for the last three years during the spawning period using the research vessel cg. 0.

Saithe (Pollachius virens) in subareas 4 and 6, and in Division 3.a (North Sea, Rockall and West of Scotland, Skagerrak and Kattegat)

SEA FISHERIES INSTITUTE IN GDYNIA Gdynia, Poland

Behaviour of mackerel schools during summer feeding migration in the Norwegian Sea, as observed from fishing vessel sonars

- 2 - MTERL ND METHODS The distribution and density of the pelagic scattering layers was estimated from echo-sounder paper records, from echo integrat

APPENDIX 3E HYDROACOUSTIC ANALYSIS OF FISH POPULATIONS IN COPCO AND IRON GATE RESERVOIRS, CALIFORNIA NOVEMBER

Survival of mackerel and saithe that escape through sorting grids in purse seines

Qualark Creek. History

Ecosystem approach to marine spatial planning Polish marine areas and the Natura 2000 network

Annual Pink Shrimp Review

Underwater noise and offshore windfarms

USE OF ACOUSTICS IN STUDIES OF FISH REACTION TO IMPOSED STIMULI

TESTING OF A NEW HOOK DESIGN (E-Z-BAITER) TiiROUGH COMPARATIVE longline FISHING TRIALS

Jack Mackerel (Trachurus Murphyi, Nichols, 1920) acoustic survey in the. central coast of Chile

Nancy E. Kohler, Danielle Bailey, Patricia A. Turner, and Camilla McCandless SEDAR34-WP-25. Submitted: 10 June 2013

FISHING ACTIVITY: SEABED TRAWLING

PROJECT Nº 96/005: SIZE SELECTIVITY AND RELATIVE FISHING POWER OF BALTIC COD GILL-NETS

Trawl fishery management of Eastern Arabian Sea

5. purse seines 3 000

Comparison of Northeast Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus) distribution patterns in the Norwegian Sea using lidar, sonar, and trawl

Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic; Reef Fish Fishery of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands;

MAFF Fisheries Research Technical Report No. 96. P.J. Dare, D.W. Palmer, M.L. Howell and C.D. Darby

Southern Gulf of St. Lawrence (4T) Herring

Rockhopper/Chain Sweep Relative Catch Efficiency Analysis

SEA FISHERIES INSTITUTE IN GDYNIA Gdynia, Poland

Transcription:

ICES Journal of Marine Science, 59: S281 S287. 2002 doi:10.1006/jmsc.2002.1279, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Rigs-to-reefs in the North Sea: hydroacoustic quantification of fish in the vicinity of a semi-cold platform Aud Vold Soldal, Ingvald Svellingen, Terje Jørgensen, and Svein Løkkeborg Soldal, A. V., Svellingen, I., Jørgensen, T., and Løkkeborg, S. 2002. Rigs-to-reefs in the North Sea: hydroacoustic quantification of fish in the vicinity of a semi-cold platform. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 59: S281 S287. We describe an experiment intended to estimate the extent to which decommissioned platforms in the North Sea attract fish. The work was carried out at a semi-cold platform in the Norwegian Sector between May and September 1998. Hydroacoustic quantification and trawling carried out by a research vessel running transects from the platform out to a distance of five nautical miles did not demonstrate higher concentrations of fish near the platform. However, for practical and security reasons the vessel was not permitted to operate closer than 50 100 m to the platform. To measure concentrations of fish close to the sides of the jacket, acoustic transducers were hung from three sides of the platform. Large differences in fish density were observed, depending on the side of the platform concerned, time of day, and season. During daytime, mackerel were schooling around the platform, while demersal fish tended to be found under the platform and close to the bottom. At night, the demersal fish spread throughout the water column in such a way that their distribution was suitable for acoustic biomass estimation. Estimated densities of cod and saithe were 0.13, 0.27, and 0.24 kg m 2 in May, July, and September, respectively, with corresponding biomass estimates at the platform of 7, 14, and 108 t. An additional 2.3 and 1.2 t of mackerel was present in July and September, respectively. 2002 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: acoustic quantification, artificial reefs, North Sea, oil platforms, rigs-to-reefs. Accepted 16 October 2001. A. V. Soldal, I. Svellingen, T. Jørgensen, and S. Løkkeborg: Institute of Marine Research, Fish Capture Division, PO Box 1870 Nordnes, N-5817 Bergen, Norway; tel: +47 5523 8500; fax: +47 5523 6830; e-mail: aud.soldal@imr.no Introduction Since oil production on the Norwegian continental shelf started in 1971, the petroleum industry has greatly increased in economic importance. Today, the largest fields have all passed their peak production and the output is declining. Some smaller fields have ended production or are in the process of being closed down. In the course of 1998, 14 platforms in the Ekofisk field were shut down. The closure plan for Ekofisk was submitted to the Norwegian Ministry of Petroleum and Energy in autumn 1999. The plan included an evaluation of a number of disposal options for each individual platform. Several studies were launched to provide the best background information about the options selected. The experiments described here formed part of a study intended to estimate the extent to which decommissioned oil platforms attract fish. As has been done successfully in the Gulf of Mexico (Gurney, 1992), this was used as input to the decision process concerning whether North Sea platform jackets could be used as artificial reefs. The rigs-to-reefs concept has not yet been adopted in the North Sea, and efforts put into quantifying aggregations of fish around rigs in this area have been limited. Fish abundance at natural and artificial reefs has usually been quantified by means of diving techniques (Bortone et al., 1989), but harsh weather conditions and greater depths make this method less suitable in the North Sea. We therefore developed hydroacoustic techniques similar to those previously used by Thorne (1994) 1054 3139/02/0S0281+07 $35.00/0 2002 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

S282 A. V. Soldal et al. Figure 1. Location of the experimental platform, Albuskjell 2/4F, in the Ekofisk field in the North Sea. and Stanley and Wilson (1996, 1997) to estimate fish abundance at a decommissioned platform. Materials and methods Experimental area The study was performed near the Albuskjell 2/4 F platform on the Ekofisk field in the Norwegian Sector of the North Sea (Figure 1). The platform is semi-cold, i.e. production was shut down in 1990 and has remained unmanned since, except for occasional maintenance. There is neither noise nor discharge of food waste or sewage, but the platform is still illuminated at night. It stands on a steel jacket weighing 7320 t and measuring 50 65 m at the base, forming an open grid structure between the bottom and the surface (Figure 2). The seabed is flat and homogeneous with sand and clay at a depth of 70 m. Research-vessel samples The RV Michael Sars (overall length 45.7 m, GRT 493, 1500 hp) was used from 11 to 25 May 1998 for acoustic quantification of fish and trawling experiments around the platform. It was equipped with a hull-mounted split-beam transducer (38 khz) and a SIMRAD EK500 echosounder connected to the Bergen Echo Integrator System (Knudsen, 1990). Acoustic measurements were made along transects, with the platform at the centre and out to a distance of five nautical miles (Figure 3). The vessel passed as close to the platform as safety permitted, i.e. 50 100 m. Four acoustic surveys were performed, two during daylight hours and two at night. Fish abundance was estimated using standard hydroacoustic methods (MacLennan and Simmonds, 1991). In interpreting the acoustic data, the water column was divided into a bottom channel (from the seabed up to 10 m) and a pelagic channel. In the bottom channel, echo integrator values were split among cod (Gadus morhua), haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus), saithe (Pollachius virens), whiting (Merlangius merlangus), herring (Clupea harengus), and other demersal fish according to the appearance of the echo recordings and the species composition in trawl catches. In the pelagic channel, the integrator values were split among plankton, saithe, and pelagic fish on the basis of the echo

Rigs-to-reefs in the North Sea S283 Platform samples Figure 2. The steel jacket of Albuskjell 2/4F. recordings only. This was done for each 0.1 nautical mile (185.2 m) along the survey transects. To identify species and size distributions of fish observed in the bottom channel, as well as to compare catches taken at different distances from the platform, a Campelen 1800 bottom-sampling trawl (80 mm stretched mesh size in the codend) rigged with rockhopper gear and Waco trawl doors (2 3 m, 1400 kg) was used. Trawl hauls were made parallel to the survey tracks at three different distances from the platform (Figure 3) from as close to the platform as possible to five nautical miles out. In total, 47 hauls were made at a towing speed of 1.5 ms 1 and with a duration of 15 min. For each species identified, a GLM analysis (General Linear Models, SAS Institute Inc. 1989) was carried out to test for differences in acoustic fish density at different distances from the platform. The model used was γ ijk =μ+α i +β j +s+ε ijk (1) where y was the measured S A -value (acoustic density) for species A, μ was the expected value of y, α was the effect of distance from the platform, β was the effect of time of day (light or dark), s represented first- and second-order interaction effects, and ε was a random error term. An identical model was used to test for a distance effect on catch rates, where y was the total catch (in kg) of the species concerned. Underwater video observations (UTV) of fish concentrated under the platform were made in July and September by lowering a high-sensitivity camera (Osprey SIT) with a pan and tilt head from the platform deck to the bottom. Acoustic quantifications from the platform were carried out during three periods: 11 25 May, 8 10 July, and 1 11 September 1998. Three 120 khz split-beam transducers (Simrad ES120-7/G) were lowered to a depth of 6 8 m to the north, east, and west sides of the platform (Figure 4). The three transducers were sequentially connected to an echosounder (Simrad EK500) via a multiplexer (Simrad MP500). The number of transmissions in each sequence was 10, with a 2-s interval between each transmission, giving 10 transmissions from each transducer every minute, day and night. Data were stored on tape for subsequent interpretation using the Bergen Echo Integrator as described above. To achieve comparable integrator values among transducers, each was calibrated separately according to standard procedures (Foote et al., 1987). Acoustic values were split among species mainly on the basis of the appearance of the echo recordings, but in addition UTV observations and information on the species composition in gillnet catches obtained in a simultaneous fishing experiment (Løkkeborg et al., 2002) were used. Cod and saithe were mixed close to the bottom, and because their size distributions were similar, they were treated as one species category (cod/ saithe). The integrator values were also split among herring, mackerel, and plankton. Mackerel were observed throughout the observation periods in July and September, but not in May. Only cod/saithe and mackerel were observed frequently enough to make a significant contribution to the analyses. The acoustic backscattering cross-section of individual fish, KσL, is the average contribution of each fish to the integrator value (McLennan and Simmonds, 1991), and is used to convert the acoustic density of fish to absolute fish density according to Urich (1975): ς=4π 10 0.1TS (2) The length-dependent average target strength (TS) is known for a number of species (Foote, 1987): for codfish, TS=20 logl 68 (db), and for mackerel TS=20 logl 77 (db). The transducers hung from the platform yielded three spot measurements of fish density close to the platform. To obtain an overall estimate of the amount of fish close to the platform, the average of the night values from the three transducers was used, assuming uniform fish distribution in the area covered by the platform and out to a certain distance. The determination of this distance

S284 A. V. Soldal et al. Figure 3. Acoustic survey tracks (unbroken lines running through the centre of the circle) and one subset of trawl hauls taken at three different distances from the platform. Figure 4. Rigging of acoustic transducers at the platform. The transducers were lowered along a rope anchored to the bottom at one end and secured to the platform at the other.

Rigs-to-reefs in the North Sea S285 Table 1. Average size of trawl catches (N: number of fish; W: weight in kg) taken by RV Michael Sars at three different distances from the platform. Haddock Saithe Cod N W s.d. N W N W s.d. Near platform 10 3.3 2.5 1 0.6 10.7 10.7 8.8 1.25 2 nm distance 39.2 9.5 10.2 12.6 5.8 3.7 4.25 5 nm distance 72.2 17.9 15.9 1 2.9 15.7 6.8 4.7 Table 2. Total number (N) and average individual lengths (L in cm) of cod and haddock caught by trawl at three different distances from the platform. Cod Haddock N L s.d. N L s.d. Near platform 139 43.8 14.3* 121 31.4 6.0 1.25 2 nm distance 164 31.8 11.0 509 28.9 4.2 4.25 5 nm distance 204 33.1 11.8 886 28.8 4.9 *Significantly larger than other groups (p<0.01). was not straightforward, as no direct measurements were made. On the basis of the spatial distribution of the gillnet catch rates in the simultaneous fishing experiment (Løkkeborg et al., 2002), we assumed uniform fish density out to a distance of 50 m, and of half this density from 50 100 m. In September, however, increased gillnet catches were obtained out to a distance of 300 m from the platform. For September, therefore, we have made two estimates, one assuming the same fish distribution as in May and July, and the other assuming a uniform fish distribution out to 300 m from the platform. Results Research-vessel samples Acoustic density on the Ekofisk field was generally low during the period when the experiments were carried out, and GLM analyses did not show any increase in fish density close to the platform. However, the analyses showed significant differences in the amount of fish according to time of day. More cod, saithe, and plankton were registered during the day than at night. Species composition in the trawl catches was dominated by cod, haddock, and saithe, followed by several species of flatfish [long rough dab (Hippoglossoides platessoides), lemon sole (Microstomus kitt), and plaice (Pleuronectes platessa)]. The average catches of the three most abundant species at different distances from the platform (Table 1) indicate significantly less haddock close to the platform than further off. No significant differences were found in the catches of cod, although there was a tendency in the direction of larger catches in weight close to the platform. Cod caught close to the platform were indeed on average larger than those caught further off (Table 2). Platform samples In May, the acoustic recordings were dominated by cod/saithe. In July and September, cod/saithe made up the largest fraction of the fish biomass recorded close to the bottom, while shoals of mackerel were seen circling around the platform at a depth of about 30 m. Although cod/saithe was treated as a single category in the analyses, the appearance of the echo traces indicated that saithe were most frequent in May, while cod dominated in July and September. The highest fish densities were found close to and up to 10 m from the bottom. Fish densities varied widely with time of day and side of the platform, with significantly higher acoustic values being recorded at night and on the east side of the platform (Figure 5). Target strength measurements showed that cod/saithe were within the length range of 60 90 cm. Underwater video observations in July and September showed demersal fish, particularly cod, very close to the platform legs near or at the sea bottom during the day, where they could not be measured acoustically. At night, however, the fish rose from the bottom and spread throughout the water column. To estimate fish density, therefore, we used the average night values of the acoustic recordings. This gave fish densities of 0.13, 0.27, and 0.24 kg m 2 in May, July, and September, respectively. The total amount of cod/saithe close to the platform was estimated at 6.8, 14, and 12 t, respectively. For September, the alternative estimate based on the wider distribution observed produced a total estimate of 108 t. Both UTV and acoustic recordings showed that

S286 A. V. Soldal et al. 18 000 16 000 14 000 North East South Acoustic density of fish 12 000 10 000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 08.07.98 09.07.98 10.07.98 Night Figure 5. Measured acoustic density (S A ) of cod/saithe on the northern, eastern, and southern sides of the platform in July. Measurement interval corresponds to a period of 1 h 30 min. Time Night mackerel were more evenly distributed throughout the day, and that they were not as closely linked to the jacket structure as cod and saithe. The estimated mackerel densities were therefore based on the average acoustic density over the entire experimental period in July and September, giving a biomass of 2.3 and 1.2 t, respectively. Discussion Trawl hauls and vessel-based hydroacoustics did not reveal any increase in fish density close to the platform, while the acoustic measurements from the platform showed a large amount of fish present close to the structure. The research vessel could not operate safely closer than 50 100 m to the platform, and this may not have been close enough to reveal the fish concentrations associated with the platform. Fishing experiments with gillnets during the same periods (Løkkeborg et al., this volume) yielded significantly higher catch rates in nets standing close to the platform, also suggesting that platforms do attract fish. These observations are in accordance with the results of earlier fishing experiments performed at Ekofisk (Olsen and Valdemarsen, 1977; Valdemarsen, 1979). Also, observations from routine video inspections of pipelines and jackets showed that large amounts of fish may gather around underwater structures, and that they are closely associated with the structures themselves (Cripps and Abel, 1995). Two distinct communities dominated the area around the platform studied: pelagic fish, mainly mackerel, schooled at a depth of about 30 m, while large predators, cod and to a lesser degree saithe, aggregated close to the structure. Similar observations have been made at a platform offshore Cameroon (Gerlotto et al., 1989). Bohnsack et al. (1994) have previously shown that larger reefs, like our platform, comprise larger but fewer individuals than smaller reefs. This has been attributed to competitive advantages of larger individuals and predation. We observed that average size of cod caught by trawl close to the platform was larger and catches of haddock were lower than further away from the structure, possibly because smaller cod and haddock were eaten or scared off by the large fish inhabiting the reef. Fish density varied considerably according to time of day and horizontal location relative to the platform. The highest density was found at night, when the fish spread throughout the water column in a way that made them more accessible to acoustic detection. A similar behaviour pattern has been observed in other species (Gerlotto et al., 1989; Thorne et al., 1989; Thorne, 1994). As has been reported by Stanley and Wilson (1997), fish densities also varied considerably from one side of the platform to another. This may be due to prevailing water currents making one side more favourable for foraging, or offering shelter from the currents.

Rigs-to-reefs in the North Sea S287 Most attempts to quantify fish stocks near natural or artificial reefs have used visual techniques (diving, UTV) (Bortone et al., 1989), although some have also used hydroacoustic techniques similar to the one used here (Thorne et al., 1989; Stanley and Wilson, 1996, 1997). Stanley and Wilson (1997) measured fish abundance by using four acoustic transducers hung from each of the four sides of a platform and also assumed fish densities measured by the transducers close to the platform to be valid for the area under the platform. To obtain an estimate of the total biomass of fish at a platform site, the area over which the fish are (evenly) distributed must be known. We have no accurate measurements of the distribution area, but only indications obtained from research vessel transects and fishing experiments, which led us to assume that the fish were evenly distributed out to a distance of 50 100 m from the platform in May and July, and out to 300 m in September. However, these distances are based on indications only and are highly uncertain. Stanley and Wilson (1997) measured the distribution area by using a horizontally oriented acoustic transducer and observed an increase in fish density only 16 20 m off the platform in the Gulf of Mexico. Based on routine video inspections of pipelines and jackets in the North Sea, Cripps and Aabel (1995) reported a sharp drop in fish density at a distance of 50 100 m from the platforms. Overall, we conclude that decommissioned platforms in the North Sea might be used effectively as artificial reefs. They do attract fish, particularly cod and saithe, to an extent that the profitability of fishing operations might be enhanced, at least for a limited number of vessels. Acknowledgements The project was funded by the Norwegian Ministry of Petroleum and Energy, the Norwegian Ministry of Fisheries and Phillips Petroleum Company Norway. References Bohnsack, J. A., Harper, D. E., McClellan, D. B., and Hulsbeck, M. 1994. Effects of reef size on colonisation and assemblage structure of fishes at artificial reefs off eastern Florida, USA. Bulletin of Marine Science, 55: 796 823. Bortone, S. A., Kimmel, J. J., and Bundrick, C. M. 1989. A comparison of three methods for visually assessing reef fish communities: time and area compensated. Northeast Gulf Science, 10: 85 96. Cripps, S. J., and Aabel, J. P. 1995. DP1 Fish survey using ROV data. RF-Rogaland Research Report no. RF-95/301, Stavanger, Norway. 12 pp. Foote, K. G. 1987. Fish target strengths for use in echo integrator surveys. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 82: 981 987. Foote, K. G., Knudsen, H. P., Vestnes, G., MacLennan, D. N., and Simmonds, E. J. 1987. Calibration of acoustic instruments for fish density estimation: a practical guide. (ICES) Cooperative Research Report, 144. 69 pp. Gerlotto, F., Bercy, C., and Bordeay, B. 1989. Echo-integration survey around offshore oil-extraction platforms off Cameroon. Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics, 11: 79 88. Gurney, J. 1992. Abandonment of offshore rigs. Experience in the Gulf of Mexico. Petroleum Review, 46: 237 239. Knudsen, H. P. 1990. The Bergen Echo Integrator: an introduction. Journal du Conseil International pour Exploration de la Mer, 47: 167 174. Løkkeborg, S., Humborstad, O.-B., Jørgensen, T., and Soldal, A. V. 2002. Spatio-temporal variations in gillnet catch rates in the vicinity of North Sea oil platforms. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 59: S294 S299. MacLennan, D. N., and Simmonds, E. J. 1991. Fisheries Acoustics. Chapman & Hall, London. 336 pp. Olsen, S., and Valdemarsen, J. W. 1977. Fish distribution studies around offshore installations. ICES CM 1977/B: 41. Stanley, D. R., and Wilson, C. A. 1996. Abundance of fishes associated with a petroleum platform as measured with dual-beam hydroacoustics. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 53: 473 475. Stanley, D. R., and Wilson, C. A. 1997. Seasonal and spatial variation in the abundance and size distribution of fishes associated with a petroleum platform in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 54: 1166 1176. Thorne, R. E. 1994. Hydroacoustic remote sensing for artificial habitats. Bulletin of Marine Science, 55: 897 901. Thorne, R. E., Hedgepeth, J. B., and Campos, J. A. 1989. The use of stationary hydroacoustic transducers to study diel and tidal influences on fish behaviour. Bulletin of Marine Science, 44: 1058 1064. Urich, R. J. 1975. Principles of Underwater Sound. McGraw- Hill, New York. 384 pp. Valdemarsen, J. W. 1979. Behavioural aspects of fish in relation to oil platforms in the North Sea. ICES CM 1979/B: 27.