COMPARASION OF WIND MEASUREMENTS BY LIDAR AND MEASUREMENT MAST FOR BORA WIND IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA. Elvir Zlomušica, Suad Zalihić, Jasmin Bejdić

Similar documents
Windcube FCR measurements

Full Classification acc. to IEC for SoDAR AQ510 Wind Finder. Vincent Camier, Managing Director, Ammonit Measurement GmbH

Executive Summary of Accuracy for WINDCUBE 200S

TESTING AND CALIBRATION OF VARIOUS LiDAR REMOTE SENSING DEVICES FOR A 2 YEAR OFFSHORE WIND MEASUREMENT CAMPAIGN

Torrild - WindSIM Case study

3D Nacelle Mounted Lidar in Complex Terrain

Wind Project Siting & Resource Assessment

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 53 (2014 )

Site Summary. Wind Resource Summary. Wind Resource Assessment For King Cove Date Last Modified: 8/6/2013 By: Rich Stromberg & Holly Ganser

Wind Resource Assessment Østerild National Test Centre for Large Wind Turbines

Increased Project Bankability : Thailand's First Ground-Based LiDAR Wind Measurement Campaign

Investigating Wind Flow properties in Complex Terrain using 3 Lidars and a Meteorological Mast. Dimitri Foussekis

Validation of Measurements from a ZephIR Lidar

Analysis and Verification of Wind Data from Ground-based LiDAR

CORRELATION EFFECTS IN THE FIELD CLASSIFICATION OF GROUND BASED REMOTE WIND SENSORS

The Wind Resource: Prospecting for Good Sites

Remote sensing standards: their current status and significance for offshore projects

Meteorological Measurements OWEZ

Meteorological Measurements OWEZ

FINO1 Mast Correction

Testing and Validation of the Triton Sodar

COMPARISON OF ZEPHIR MEASUREMENTS AGAINST CUP ANEMOMETRY AND POWER CURVE ASSESSMENT

Comparison of flow models

Validation of long-range scanning lidars deployed around the Høvsøre Test Station

Wind Speed and Energy at Different Heights on the Latvian Coast of the Baltic Sea

Laser remote sensing for wind energy

MULTI-WTG PERFORMANCE OFFSHORE, USING A SINGLE SCANNING DOPPLER LIDAR

Wind Flow Analysis on a Complex Terrain

WIND CONDITIONS MODELING FOR SMALL WIND TURBINES

HOUTEN WIND FARM WIND RESOURCE ASSESSMENT

Draft Kivalina Wind Resource Report

Tidal influence on offshore and coastal wind resource predictions at North Sea. Barbara Jimenez 1,2, Bernhard Lange 3, and Detlev Heinemann 1.

On- and Offshore Assessment of the ZephIR Wind-LiDAR

Wind Resource Assessment for FALSE PASS, ALASKA Site # 2399 Date last modified: 7/20/2005 Prepared by: Mia Devine

Evaluation of wind flow with a nacelle-mounted, continuous wave wind lidar

July Interim Report. National Institute of Wind Energy (NIWE) Wind Resource Assessment & Offshore Unit Chennai, India.

Validation of measurements from a ZephIR Lidar

Results and conclusions of a floating Lidar offshore test

Nanortalik A preliminary analysis of the wind measurements rev 1

Valerijs Bezrukovs, Vladislavs Bezrukovs Ventspils University College Latvia. WREF2012 Denver, CO May 13-17, 2012

Wind Data Verification Report Arriga 50m

LiDAR Application to resource assessment and turbine control

Buckland Wind Resource Report

Wind shear and its effect on wind turbine noise assessment Report by David McLaughlin MIOA, of SgurrEnergy

7 th International Conference on Wind Turbine Noise Rotterdam 2 nd to 5 th May 2017

Snare Wind Monitoring Update 2016

Supplement of Wind turbine power production and annual energy production depend on atmospheric stability and turbulence

Wind Resource Assessment for NOME (ANVIL MOUNTAIN), ALASKA Date last modified: 5/22/06 Compiled by: Cliff Dolchok

EMPOWERING OFFSHORE WINDFARMS BY RELIABLE MEASUREMENTS

WIND DATA REPORT. Paxton, MA

Accounting for the speed shear in wind turbine power performance measurement

Kodiak, Alaska Site 1 Wind Resource Report for Kodiak Electric Association

Inuvik Wind Monitoring Update 2016

M. Mikkonen.

Session 2a: Wind power spatial planning techniques. IRENA Global Atlas Spatial planning techniques 2-day seminar

Session 2: Wind power spatial planning techniques

Wind Farm Power Performance Test, in the scope of the IEC

Rotor Average wind speed for power curve performance. Ioannis Antoniou (LAC), Jochen Cleve (LAC), Apostolos Piperas (LAC)

Atqasuk Wind Resource Report

New IEC and Site Conditions in Reality

Wake effects at Horns Rev and their influence on energy production. Kraftværksvej 53 Frederiksborgvej 399. Ph.: Ph.

Power curves - use of spinner anemometry. Troels Friis Pedersen DTU Wind Energy Professor

Yellowknife Area Wind Potential

Wind LiDAR measurement campaign at CESAR Observatory in Cabauw: preliminary results

PROJECT CYCLOPS: THE WAY FORWARD IN POWER CURVE MEASUREMENTS?

REMOTE SENSING APPLICATION in WIND ENERGY

WindPRO version Nov 2012 Project:

LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA ANNUAL REPORT. Mass Turnpike Authority Blandford, MA

WIND DATA REPORT. Paxton, MA

WIND DATA REPORT. Swan s Island, ME

WindProspector TM Lockheed Martin Corporation

Post-mortem study on structural failure of a wind farm impacted by super typhoon Usagi

Influence of wind direction on noise emission and propagation from wind turbines

WCA Wind Research Project Report

Spectral analysis of wind turbulence measured by a Doppler Lidar for velocity fine structure and coherence studies

Flow analysis with nacellemounted

DIRECTION DEPENDENCY OF OFFSHORE TURBULENCE INTENSITY IN THE GERMAN BIGHT

Measuring power performance with a Wind Iris 4- beam in accordance with EUDP procedure

Kake, Alaska Wind Resource Report

National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Wind Resource Data Summary Guam Naval Ordnance Annex Data Summary and Retrieval for November 2009

Measuring offshore winds from onshore one lidar or two?

The OWEZ Meteorological Mast

Measurement of rotor centre flow direction and turbulence in wind farm environment

Wind Turbine Noise Measurements How are Results influenced by different Methods of deriving Wind Speeds? Sylvia Broneske

P.O.Box 43 Blindern, 0313 Oslo, Norway Tel.: , Fax: Statkraft,Postboks 200 Lilleaker, 0216 Oslo, Norway ABSTRACT

Wind resource and site assessment

Kodiak, Alaska Site 1 Wind Resource Report

Outline. Wind Turbine Siting. Roughness. Wind Farm Design 4/7/2015

Computational Fluid Dynamics

Preliminary layout report

Can Lidars Measure Turbulence? Comparison Between ZephIR 300 and an IEC Compliant Anemometer Mast

Wind measurements that reduce electricity prices

3D Turbulence at the Offshore Wind Farm Egmond aan Zee J.W. Wagenaar P.J. Eecen

Offshore Micrositing - Meeting The Challenge

Control Strategies for operation of pitch regulated turbines above cut-out wind speeds

Pitka s Point, Alaska Wind Resource Report

Measurement and simulation of the flow field around a triangular lattice meteorological mast

SUPPLEMENTARY GUIDANCE NOTE 4: WIND SHEAR

WIND DATA REPORT. Bourne Water District

Strategic Advice about Floating LiDAR Campaigns. Borssele offshore wind farm

Transcription:

COMPARASION OF WIND MEASUREMENTS BY LIDAR AND MEASUREMENT MAST FOR BORA WIND IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Elvir Zlomušica, Suad Zalihić, Jasmin Bejdić University Džemal Bijedić of Mostar elvir.zlomusica@unmo.ba, suad.zalihic@unmo.ba, jabc@cowi.dk ABSTRACT Research of wind energy potential with the aim of installing wind turbines was performed on location Hrgud in the southeastern part of Bosnia and Herzegovina. These are complex terrains characterized by specific wind Bora. Measurements were performed by standard procedures using the classical standard instruments, anemometers and wind vanes, mounted at different heights on the measurement mast height of 77.5 m (agl) combined with remote sensing technique such as the LIDAR (LIght Detection And Ranging) during period 23.8. 2013. 19.12. 2013. The aim of this study was to perform an analysis and comparison of collected measurement data from the measurement mast and the LIDAR (Windcube v2 FCR), as well as the behavior of the equipment itself in the complex terrain and wind Bora conditions in Bosnia. During the comparison the 10-min averaging time for the wind speed and direction is used. It can be concluded from this analysis that the behavior of the LIDAR under harsh local weather conditions was relatively well, except the problems with the power supply. The LIDAR uncorrected wind speed was in general lower than the wind speed measured by the cup anemometer at the same height. The comparison of the data of measurement methods provides reliable information on the wind speed within the considered altitude range. Keywords: wind energy, LIDAR, wind Bora, Bosnia 229 P a g e

ISSD 2014 The 5 th International Symposium on Sustainable Development PROCEEDINGS 1. INTRODUCTION The first measurements with adequate equipment and technology aimed at determining of the wind energy potential in Bosnia started in 2002 at the location of Podveležje (Mostar). Thanks to analysis of data from different measurements campaigns the area of south Bosnia and Herzegovina has been recognized as an interesting region for wind power production. At the moment, it is impossible to discuss precisely about the real potential for the wind farm construction. Research is still incomplete and limited by the complexity of terrain and by the wind Bora. The Bora is a strong cold katabatic wind which mostly blows from north to north east, starts suddenly and decelerate slow. There are anti - cyclonal (dry) and cyclonal (with clouds) Bora. Furthermore, there are several conditions needed for Bora (mountain massifs, different values of temperature and pressure in the heights and lowlands, etc.). Also, there has not been enough studies or research conducted on Bora in Bosnia and Herzegovina. According to the rough estimation, the economically feasible potential should be around 1 000 1 200 MW (Zlomušica & Behmen, 2003; Ćatović, Behmen, & Zlomušica, 2004; Zlomušica, 2010). In any case, it would be a success to install 50 MW before the year of 2015 (Zlomušica, 2013). Detailed knowledge of the wind resource is necessary in the developmental and operational stages of a wind farm site (International Standard, IEC 61400-12-1 Ed. 1., 2005). As wind turbines continue to grow in size, measurement masts for mounting cup anemometers (the standard procedure for wind resource assessment) have become much taller, and much more expensive. The LIDAR is ground-based and can work over one hundred of meters, sufficient for the tall wind turbines. The use of LIDAR in complex terrain is very attractive for wind site assessments since a grinding installation of a high mast can be avoided. The measurement campaigns in some projects showed very promising results (Albers, Janssen, & Mander, 2008; Bingöl, Mann, & Foussekis, 2008; Bourgeois, Cattin, Locker, & Winkelmeier, 2008; Bourgeois, Cattin, Winkelmeier, & Locker, 2009; Krishnamurthy, Boquet, & Machta, 2014). Some strengths of the LIDAR are: relatively easy to deploy, still some fingering with cables and tubes, installed by one or two persons in half a day, withstanding harsh climatic conditions, low power consumption and no noise, while some weaknesses of the LIDAR are: uncertainty of accuracy of wind speed data in complex terrain, very expensive high-tech instrument, affected by rain and low clouds. However, to the present day it is not recommended to use a LIDAR as a stand alone instrument for accurate wind measurements. More validation studies and comparisons are needed and data retrieval algorithms (vertical wind speed, turbulence) have to be improved. Furthermore, the assumption of a homogeneous flow field used by the LIDAR technology has to be considered in the data analyses, especially in complex terrain. In the next period the standard (IEC 61400-12-1 Ed. 1., 2005) is expected to be changed, and a new standard will include remote sensing techniques like the LIDAR. The aim of the work is to compare the wind measurements from commercial LIDAR instrument against an instrumented mast, in complex terrain, where many wind farms are now being installed worldwide, as well as equipment behavior under harsh meteorological conditions at the locality of Hrgud (southeast of Bosnia and Herzegovina). This equipment has been used first time in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Measurements performed during the summer-fall period of 2013 in the duration of four months. 230 P a g e

2. METHOD AND MATERIALS A four-months measurement campaign with an LIDAR and 78.5 m mast, which provided also has long term data, for evaluating the remote sensing instruments, was performed. The LIDAR was connected directly to the electrical grid via the local power line. However this power line has been hit by lightings several times during the measurement campaign, which has destroyed the 220V to 24V LIDAR convertor. 2.1 Site description The measurement site called Hrgud in Bosnia and Hercegovina is situated approximately 35 km southeast of the city of Mostar or 5 km east from the town of Stolac, 10-11 km west from the town of Berkovići, 50 km east from the Adriatic sea coast, Figure 1. The area can be categorized as complex, with altitudes varying between 960 to 1110 m asl (above sea level) and is approximately 5 km 2. A southeast northwest fault delimiting the plateau is characterised with a very steep slope, which have a significant influence at the wind flow at the site. The terrain is characterized by karsts with small meadows, bushes and low forest vegetation. Figure 1. Location of the Hrgud site in Bosnia and Herzegovina Figure 2 shows the wind rose (frequency) for the Hrgud site of filtered data at 77.5 m agl for the met mast at Hrgud site. The met mast was installed according to the standard IEC 61400-12-1 (IEC 61400-12-1 Ed. 1., 2005) and MEASNET (Measuring Network of Wind Energy Institutes) (Measnet, 2009). It can be seen that the prevailing wind directions are NNE and SSE and consequently the most of the wind energy comes from these directions. 231 P a g e

ISSD 2014 The 5 th International Symposium on Sustainable Development PROCEEDINGS Figure 2. Frequency and energy roses at 77.5 m for the 12 months of wind data at the met mast Hrgud Site conditions parameters for the met mast height 77.5 m are: max 10-min. measured wind speed is 31.4 m/s, max 3-sec. measured wind speed is 38.7 m/s, annual mean temperature is 10.2 C, annual min. temperature is 10 C and annual mean air density is 1.083 kg/m 3 (Impro-Impex & COWI, 2013). 2.2 Measurement configuration The instruments were installed at a height 1098 m asl. The instruments site coordinates are X: 258 392, Y: 4 776 046 of UTM WGS84 projection, according to the resolution of the GPS device. The instruments were located on 100 m high hill about 1.5 km North of a 1000 m deep and 2 km wide canyon. The hill is about 1 km long and 100 m wide, oriented E-W. The LIDAR was positioned approximately 1.5 m from measuring mast, Figure 3. The sensor height in the LIDAR is 1 meter above mast ground level. Therefore 1 meter shall be added to the entered heights to get the actual measuring height. The LIDAR measurement started on 23 August 2013. The system consists of a Windcube v2 LIDAR, set up to measure the windspeed at 10 different heights. The LIDAR is powered by 220 V supplied from the commercial grid. Data from the LIDAR shall be used as supplement to data from Hrgud mast (as long term data), in order to give a better assessment of the wind conditions on the site. 232 P a g e

Figure 3. The measurement site Hrgud, LIDAR (left) mast (right) Windcube v2 LIDAR equipped with FCR (Flow Complexity Recognition) for direct wind measurements in complex terrain was used in this campaign. The height range of this instrument is from 40-200 m, data sampling rate is 1 sec. In Table 1 the measurement configuration and measurement periods of the met mast and the LIDAR are shown. Table 1. Measurement configuration Measurement height of wind speed (m) Measurement height of wind direction (m) Measurement period Mast, cup anemometers, Thies Classic, wind vanes Thies Compact 30; 55; 55; 75; 77.5 53 and 75 30 July 2012 up to date LIDAR Windcube v2 44; 54; 64; 74; 77; 79; 89; 119; 129; 159 44; 54; 64; 74; 77; 79; 89; 119; 129; 159 23 August 2013 19 December 2013 3. RESULTS 3.1 Analyse of the data availability The analyzed period for this study started 23 August 2013 and ended 19 Decebmer 2013. The time series of the wind speed measured with the top cup anemometer at 77.5 m and the LIDAR with and without FCR at 78 m are displayed in Figure 4. 233 P a g e

ISSD 2014 The 5 th International Symposium on Sustainable Development PROCEEDINGS Figure 4. Time series of the wind speed measured with the top cup anemometer (black), the LIDAR without correction (red) and the LIDAR with FCR (green) The LIDAR measurements were interrupted several times during measuring campaing. The main events causing interruption in the measurements are summarized in Table 2. Table 2. Periods improper functioning of the LIDAR Beginning End Explanation 29.8.2013 3.10.2013 FCR accidentally turned off 9.10.2013 20.10.2013 Power supply damaged by lighting 20.10.2013 23.10.2013 Complete std data files, but incomplete FCR files (only 1 value/day) 25.10.2013 30.10.2013 Complete std data files, but incomplete FCR files (only 1 value/day) 5.11.2013 17.11.2013 Power supply damaged by lighting 23.11.2013 23.11.2013 End of reliable measurements; LIDAR system damaged by lighting Much more LIDAR uncorrected wind speed data (non-corrected for the terrain effect) were collected than FCR corrected data. 3.2 Comparison of the measured wind speeds The comparison of the measured wind speeds between the cup anemometer at 77.5 m and the uncorrected LIDAR measurements and the FCR corrected LIDAR data at 78 m, respectively, for the same dataset is shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6 with scatterplots and the evaluated regression and correlation coefficients. Dataset including uncorrected LIDAR wind speed data with an availability above 80% (Red: two parametric linear regression; Blue: one parametric linear regression forced through 0).The uncorrected LIDAR wind speed measurements underestimate the cup anemometer by 4.1% on average, Figure 5. 234 P a g e

Figure 5. Uncorrected LIDAR wind speed at 78 m vs cup anemometer wind speed at 77.5 m The FCR corrected LIDAR wind speed measurements overestimate the cup anemometer by 1.5% on average. The correlation coefficient is higher for the FCR corrected data than for the uncorrected measurement. Dataset including FCR LIDAR wind speed data with an availability above 80% (Red: two parametric linear regression; Blue: one parametric linear regression forced through 0), Figure 6. Figure 6. FCR LIDAR wind speed at 78 m vs cup anemometer wind speed at 77.5 m Similar comparisons between LIDAR wind speeds (uncorrected and FCR corrected) were done at 75 m and 55 m. The comparison results are similar to those at 77.5 m (Wagner & Bejdić, 2014). 235 P a g e

ISSD 2014 The 5 th International Symposium on Sustainable Development PROCEEDINGS 3.3 Comparison of the measured wind direction Direction measurements were taken at 53 m and 75 m with Thies Compact wind vanes, but the wind vane at 75 m got broken during the measurement campaign, therefore the wind vane at 53 m was used in the analysis. The direction measured by the LIDAR at 55 m was compared to the direction from the wind vane at 53 m. The comparisons of the LIDAR uncorrected direction and the FCR corrected direction are not identical but very similar (Figure 7 and Figure 8). In both cases, the linear regression results in an offset of about 11 0. Figure 7. Uncorrected LIDAR wind direction at 55 m vs wind vane at 53 m (Red: two parametric linear regression) Wind speed below 3 m/s for this comparison Figure 8. FCR LIDAR wind direction at 55 m vs wind vane at 53 m. (Red: two parametric linear regression) - Wind speed below 3 m/s for this comparison 236 P a g e

3.4 Wind Shear The wind shear or vertical wind speed profile is an important parameter in the choice of the optimal hub height of wind turbine. The wind shear expresses the ratio between the wind speeds at different heights. The wind shear, of course, depends on the topography of the site and is not identical for all directions. The power law wind shear is defined by (International Standard. IEC 61400-1 Ed. 3., 2005): 2 v1 h2 h1 v (1) where the shear exponent α is calculated between the respective heights h 1 and h 2 and their corresponding wind speeds v 1 and v 2. The average wind speed profiles for the four prevailing wind sector measured with the mast between 30 and 77.5 m and with the LIDAR between 45 and 160 m are displayed in Figure 9. The wind sector is indicated at the top of each plot and with the number of data within that sector in parenthesis. The vertical wind speed profiles of LIDAR and mast agree very well for the NE sectors 0-30, 30-60 and SE sectors 120-150, 150-180. However it was noticed in Figure 9 that the averaged profiles do not typically follow a power law. Figure 9. Average wind speed profile for the prevailing wind directions of mast data (black), uncorrected LIDAR (red) and FCR corrected LIDAR (green) 237 P a g e

ISSD 2014 The 5 th International Symposium on Sustainable Development PROCEEDINGS 4. CONCLUSIONS The LIDAR functioned relatively well in complex conditions of the terrain and wind characteristics of Bora. Unfortunate events demonstrate the importance of protecting the power supply of the LIDAR from an exposed power line. The LIDAR software also happened to be unstable, since several periods of data were missing although the system had power. The LIDAR uncorrected wind speed was in general lower than the wind speed measured by the cup anemometer at the same height by about 4%. The FCR corrected wind speeds were higher than the cup anemometer wind speed by about 1.5%. Based on a rough analysis of the surrounding topography, it seems that the LIDAR deviation is mainly affected by the topography around the LIDAR within a radius of 500 m but the major features of the topography within a larger radius has also some influence. This would need to be further investigated with numerical tools (CFD). The LIDAR uncorrected wind directions compared well to the wind vane and the FCR correction had no significance influence on this comparison. The shear exponent derived from the LIDAR wind speeds, both without and with FCR, compared relatively well with the shear exponent form the mast cup anemometers. For more relevant observance of Bora characteristics and behavior of the equipment in a complex location like this one, it is necessary to carry out measurements in a longer period of time and in different seasons. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This work was performed under project Wind Measurement Program in RS, Bosnia & Herzegovina. The authors are grateful for the considerable technical support from the staff of the COWI A/S and Impro Impex doo. REFERENCES Zlomušica, E., & Behmen, M. (2003). Methodological approach to the selection of wind farm location. Proceeding of 12th International Symposium on Power Electronics, Ee, Novi Sad, Serbia. Ćatović, F., Behmen, M., & Zlomušica, E. (2004). Trends in the Development of the Electric Power Systems Based on Wind energy in World and in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology-Official Journal of the Balkan Environmental Association (B.EN.A), 5(4), 836-840. Zlomušica, E. (2010). Wind Energy Resources in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Thermal Science, 14(1), 255-260. Zlomušica, E. (2013). Particular Review on SODAR and LIDAR Measurements of Bora Wind in Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina, International Journal of Engineering & Technology IJET-IJENS, 13(6), 53-61. International Standard. IEC 61400-12-1 Ed. 1. (12/2005). Power performance measurements of electricity producing wind turbines. Albers, A., Janssen, W., & Mander, J. (2008). Comparison of LIDARs, German test station for remote wind sensing devices. German Wind Energy Conference, DEWEK, Bremen, Germany. Bingöl, F., Mann, J., & Foussekis, D. (2009). Lidar Performance in Complex Terrain Modeled by WASP Engineering. European Wind Energy Conference & Exhibition, EWEC, Marseille, France. Bourgeois, S., Cattin, R., Locker, I., & Winkelmeier, H. (2008). Analysis of the vertical wind profile at a BORA dominated site in Bosnia based on SODAR and ZephIR LIDAR measurements. European Wind Energy Conference & Exhibition, EWEC, Brussels, Belgium. Bourgeois, S., Cattin, R., Winkelmeier, H., & Locker, I. (2009). CFD Modeling of the vertical wind profile and the turbulence structure above complex terrain and validation with SODAR and LIDAR measurements. European Wind Energy Conference & Exhibition, EWEC, Marseille, France. Krishnamurthy, R., Boquet, M., & Machta, M. (2014). Turbulence Intensity Measurements from a Varity of Doppler LIDAR. European Wind Energy Conference & Exhibition, EWEA, Barcelona, Spain. 238 P a g e

Measnet. (2009). Evaluation of site-specific wind conditions Version 1. Impro-Impex, COWI. (2013). Hrgud 12 Months Wind Study and Site Conditions Report. Wagner, R., & Bejdić, J. (2014). Windcube + FCR test in Hrgud, Bosnia & Herzegovina - Final report. DTU Wind Energy. International Standard. IEC 61400-1 Ed. 3. (08/2005). Wind Turbines - Part 1: Design Requirements. Elvir Zlomušica was born in 1971 in Mostar (Bosnia). Since 2000 he has been employed at the University. In 2006 he got a PhD degree in technical sciences from University Džemal Bijedić of Mostar. He is the co-author of a book and author or co-author of more than 40 articles and scientific papers presented in conferences and seminars, home and abroad. He was involved in realization of over 20 research projects related to production process. Since October 2011 he has been employed as an associate professor. Since April 2012 he has performed the function of a vice-rector of the University Džemal Bijedić of Mostar. His research interests include renewable energy sources, wind energy. Suad Zalihić was born in 1960 in Mostar (Bosnia). Since 2010 he has been employed at the University. In 2013 he got a MSc degree in technical sciences from University Džemal Bijedić of Mostar. He participated in the implementation of many projects related to wind potential research at various locations in Bosnia and Herzegovina. His research interests include wind energy and wind loads on various structures. Jasmin Bejdić was born in 1985 in Banja Luka (Bosnia). He holds a MSc degree in Wind Energy from Technical University of Denmark. He has been working with wind energy since 2006, first for an Danish wind energy developer/investor European Energy A/S and since 2011 as a consultant in COWI A/S. Bejdić has great world wide experience wind measurements and application of wind data for wind farm development. 239 P a g e