Deer Committee Summary and Recommendations. The Village of North Haven deer committee was formed in early 2013 to

Similar documents
TOWN OF ISLESBORO DEER REDUCTION COMMITTEE REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO CONDUCT A SPECIAL HUNT INTRODUCTION

White-tailed Deer Management in Urban/Suburban Environments: Planning for Success

Living with White-Tailed Deer. A Homeowner s Guide

PRESENTATION TO TOWN BOARD

Salida Urban Deer Task Force Recommendations

Deer and Deer Management in Central New York: Local Residents Interests and Concerns

Hunting at The Trustees. The Trustees of Reservations Policy on Hunting

Township of Plainsboro Ordinance No County of Middlesex AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A DEER MANAGEMENT PLAN ON CERTAIN PUBLIC PROPERTY

TOWN OF ISLESBORO DEER REDUCTION COMMITTEE (DRC) SPECIAL DEER HUNT, DECEMBER 10-31, 2012* HUNTER INFORMATION BEFORE THE HUNT

City of Galena 2017 Deer Hunting Survey

Iroquoia Heights Conservation Area White-tailed Deer Management Strategy

TIEE Teaching Issues and Experiments in Ecology - Volume 2, August 2004

Deer Management. In Mt. Lebanon

DMU 452 Northern Multi-County Deer Management Unit

NOW THERFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF BRIDGEPORT, WEST VIRGINIA:

Wildlife Crossings: A Solution for Moose Vehicle Collisions in Alaska

Managing Vertebrate Pests

Oakcrest II Homeowner s Association HOA Sept 10

Full Spectrum Deer Management Services

Managing Encounters Between Humans and Coyotes. Guidelines and Information

TOWN OF ISLESBORO DEER REDUCTION COMMITTEE REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO MODIFY AND EXTEND THE SPECIAL HUNT INTRODUCTION

Deer Management Unit 127

Proposal for Village of Hamilton Deer Culling Program

Upper Dublin Township Deer Management Program (DMP)

DMU 043 Lake County Deer Management Unit

VILLAGE OF NILES TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY

TOWN OF ERWIN 310 TOWN CENTER ROAD PAINTED POST, NY 14870

DMU 419 Clinton, Eaton, Ingham, Ionia, and Shiawassee Counties

YO LANDOWNERS ASSOCIATION (YOLA) WILDLIFE REGULATIONS

African swine fever situation/control/surveillance measures applied in Slovakia

DMU 487 Northern Multi-County Deer Management Unit

# Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Freeway System Reconstruction Study and Preliminary Recommended Plan

City of Delafield Deer Management Program 2018

2018 WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT PLAN

CHECKS AND BALANCES. OVERVIEW Students become managers of a herd of animals in a paper-pencil, discussionbased

Thermoplastic Road Marking Applicator

RANCH & FARM SALES PRESENTS

RANCH & FARM SALES PRESENTS

PRIORITY READING HOPEWELL VALLEY DEER MANAGEMENT PLAN. Hopewell Valley Deer Management Task Force: Abating Deer Impacts at the Community Level

Comprehensive Deer Management Program Montgomery County, MD. Rob Gibbs Natural Resources Manager M-NCPPC, Montgomery Dept of Parks

Risk of spread after introduction of the virus in to wild boar population

DMU 065 Ogemaw County Deer Management Unit

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PENTICTON COUNCIL REPORT. DATE: 9 th January 2012 RES:

The City has been approached by several individuals about the destruction of their fruits and vegetables.

DMU 057 Missaukee County Deer Management Unit

Managing Wildlife Populations

Wisconsin Wildlife Federation Legislative Summary State Legislative Session August (26 th ) 2017

CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED ORDINANCE NO

Lake Lansing Park-North. Deer Management Plan

NEW YORK STATE WHITETAIL MANAGEMENT COALITION, INC. PO Box 191,Grahamsville, New York

Secretary Game Animal Panel PO Box 9134 Addington CHRISTCHURCH 8243

#!! "$% ##! &! # '#! % $ #!

DMU 332 Huron, Sanilac and Tuscola Counties Deer Management Unit

AN ASSESSMENT OF NEW JERSEY DEER HUNTER OPINION ON EXPANDING ANTLER POINT RESTRICTION (APR) REGULATIONS IN DEER MANAGEMENT ZONES 28, 30, 31, 34 AND 47

TOWN OF GUILFORD 31 Park Street GUILFORD, CONNECTICUT SETTLED IN 1639

2.0 BACKGROUND AND PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ON RESIDENT CANADA GOOSE MANAGEMENT Questions and Answers

Mission-Geneva Transportation Study Community Workshop 2 July 8, 2006

Jeffrey M. Ver Steeg Colorado Parks and Wildlife. December 14, 2016

DMU 008 Barry County Deer Management Unit

JF2 RANCH ACRES FRIO COUNTY, PEARSALL, TX REPUBLICRANCHES.COM MURPHY E. RAY. Sales Agent

Community Based Deer Management Manual for Municipalities. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Division of Fish and Wildlife

Deer Management Unit 252

RANCH & FARM SALES PRESENTS

Caddo Lake Institute s -Hunter Research Team Report Hunting Program Statistics & Observations Longhorn AAP-Caddo Lake NWR February 7, 2004

City of Dubuque. Deer Management. A program designed to control excess deer within the city limits of Dubuque and the surrounding outlying area.

Minutes of Meeting - January 28, 2013

Deer Management Unit 152

Mule Deer. Dennis D. Austin. Published by Utah State University Press. For additional information about this book

DMU 047 Livingston County Deer Management Unit

A NEW ERADICATION STRATEGY FOR SMALL, REMOTE GYPSY MOTH INFESTATIONS

AMMENDING SECTIONS OF PART FIVE, GENERAL OFFENSE CODE, TO AUTHORIZE THE ABATEMENT OF NUISANCE ANIMALS FROM WITHIN THE VILLAGE.

SUMMARY REPORT Managed Archery Program Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania. Submitted by Dr. Anthony J. DeNicola White Buffalo Inc.

Mitigating Vehicle Collisions with Large Wildlife

Wisconsin Deer Hunting Pocket Guide

Hunter Perceptions of Chronic Wasting Disease in Illinois

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUMMARY OF COUGAR MANAGEMENT IN NEIGHBORING STATES

Whiskey Creek Ranch 87.5+/- Acres Young County, Texas Reduced: $595,000

City of Rocky Mount Residential Traffic Management Policy

Washington St. Corridor Study

Deer Management Program Proposal

DMU 038 Jackson County

Prepared By: Environmental Preservation Committee REVISED: 3/29/05. Please see last section for Summary of Amendments

Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD)

Minnesota Deer Population Goals

Chronic Wasting Disease in Southeast Minnesota. Drs. Michelle Carstensen and Lou Cornicelli Preston Public Meeting December 18, 2018

Full summaries of all proposed rule changes, including DMU boundary descriptions, are included in the additional background material.

Woodward Hill Elementary School School Safety and Operation Review

DMU 073 Saginaw County Deer Management Unit

Report to the Joint Standing Committee on Inland Fisheries and Wildlife

Early History, Prehistory

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2012 Session

Monitoring Asian Elephants and Mitigating Human-Elephant Conflict in the Core Landscape of the Southern/Eastern Cardamom Mountains, Cambodia

WORKING WITH COMMUNITIES AND INTEREST GROUPS

Cariboo-Chilcotin (Region 5) Mule Deer: Frequently Asked Questions

"Oh! Deer! & Limiting Factors" adapted from Project Wild Mr. Mark Musselman Audubon at the Francis Beidler Forest

Grand Haven Charter Township. Facts and Trends Affecting Grand Haven Charter Township January 2017

NORTH COVENTRY TOWNSHIP White-Tailed Deer

The City of Kaukauna Authorized Deer Hunt

SAFE WALKS PROGRAM FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Transcription:

Deer Committee Summary and Recommendations Objective: The Village of North Haven deer committee was formed in early 2013 to address the problems created by deer in the Village of North Haven NY. The increase in the incidences of Lyme and other tick borne diseases has prompted the Village to look at ways to reduce the tick population. Other issues caused by the large deer population are vehicle accidents caused by deer and the damage to natural plant communities and landscape plantings. The primary objective of the committee is to make recommendations that will provide the most effective reduction of the deer and tick population and thereby minimizing the impact of the problems they create. Participants: Larry Baum Davis Saskas Susan Kinsella Chris Miller Steven Hatfield Jack Reiser Alex Kreigsman Joseph Kunzeman Laura Nolan Jeffrey Sander North Haven Manor North Haven Point West Banks West Banks Oak Drive Ferry Road Ferry Road Robertson Drive North Haven Manor & Village Mayor Village Trustee Study:

The committee reviewed a significant amount of literature on the subject of deer management. Two approaches were studied in depth including the reduction of the deer herd through hunting and reducing the density of ticks and therefore tick diseases through the use of the 4-Poster Program that is used on Shelter Island. Other approaches were reviewed through available literature and deemed not effective or too costly. These included birth control, trap and relocate, and fencing and other deterrents. Deer Herd Reduction Summary of Findings Advantages: -Effective in reducing all three of the deer issues. Numerous studies have shown that deer are the primary host for tick breeding and when the deer are eliminated or reduced substantially the tick population is also substantially reduced. -Low Cost Issues: -Humane issues. -The herd must be reduced substantially to have a positive effect. (It is estimated that we would have to reduce the herd to approx. 10 per square mile

which would equal a total of 25-30 deer in North Haven). The aerial deer count that was completed in 2013 showed 104 total deer in the Village. -Currently restricted to bow & arrow during season Oct 1 through March 31. -Hunting areas are restricted and must have permission of all home owners within 500ft. Hunting must be 500ft from any home. -NYS may further restrict seasonal hunting. -The North Haven seasonal hunting program has not been effective in reducing the herd significantly. 4-Poster Program Advantages: -The use of 4-Poster Feeding Stations has significantly reduced the density of ticks where used on Shelter Island and as reported by other studies. Issues: -The 4-Poster program does not reduce the deer herd and therefore does not address the issues of vehicular accidents and damage to plants. -Cost estimated at $240,000 to $250,000 per year. -Deployment and placement. To effectively cover the Village it is estimated that we would need one station per 40-50 acres or a total of about 40 stations.

-Set back restrictions from homes and roadways limits placement of stations. Most stations would have to be placed on private land and would require homeowner approval. -It is not clear we would have enough locations for station placement to adequately cover the Village. -Implementing 4-Poster Stations limits hunting. To effectively implement either of the options we need support from the North Haven Community. -We need to expand the number of hunting locations on private land to reduce the herd. - To implement a 4-Poater Program we would need resident support for the funding and placement of feeding stations. Recommendations A. Hold a community meeting in July or August 2013 to review the findings of the committee and solicit feedback and support from our residents. B. Herd reduction: There are many items that can help increase our hunting and contribute to significantly reducing the deer herd. Form an ongoing committee to aggressively pursue the following actions. -Actively solicit neighbors to expand the number of hunting locations in the Village. -Pursue more hunters and hunting frequency during the hunting season.

-Investigate hiring professional hunters to conduct controlled hunts. -Investigate renting or buying a refrigerated trailer to assist hunters in the disposal of deer carcasses. Similar to Southold. -Identify locations that can butcher the carcasses and distribute the meat to those in need. - Continually interact with neighboring communities to identify other actions that have worked for them. C. The 4-Poster Program: The majority of the committee felt that the most effective approach was to aggressively pursue herd reduction and that the 4-Poster Program is too expensive and difficult to implement. There is however strong support for the 4-Poster Program by some residents and it is still unclear if we can implement all the actions to reduce the herd or if those actions will be effective. More study is also needed to determine if the 4- Poster Program can be implemented and funded. For these reasons it is recommended that a committee be formed to address the issues associated with the 4-Poster Program and develop a plan which includes, -Detailed evaluation of costs and implementation plans, -Station purchase cost.

-Station maintenance -Feed Cost and storage -Staffing and administration requirements. -Station location and coverage. -Operating periods -Evaluate funding alternative including, -Private funding like SI -Other Government Funding. -Village funding requirements