****** * EX * ****** DWN W.W.POWELL CALCULATION OF FLOW LOSSES IN INLET CHK D.PAPA AND DISCHARGE HEADERS ASSOCIATED WITH

Similar documents
S.A. Klein and G.F. Nellis Cambridge University Press, 2011

Applied Fluid Mechanics

Single & Headered Relief Vent Piping Analysis

ANDERSON GREENWOOD. Provides reliable overpressure protection in a cost effective package. Flow Control

Tutorial. BOSfluids. Relief valve

ASHRAE made significant changes in 2001 to the calculations. Fundamentals of Safety Relief Systems

Application Worksheet

Device Description. Operating Information. CP Q (eq. 1) GT. Technical Bulletin TB-0607-CFP Hawkeye Industries Critical Flow Prover

Practical Guide. By Steven T. Taylor, P.E., Member ASHRAE

Technical Committee on LP-Gas at Utility Gas Plants

Gerald D. Anderson. Education Technical Specialist

Modeling a Pressure Safety Valve

Pressure Relief Valves

IRC 2011 All Rights Reserved

The capacity of the cargo tank venting system (46 CFR );

ANDERSON GREENWOOD SERIES 9000 POSRV INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE INSTRUCTIONS

Cover Page for Lab Report Group Portion. Compressible Flow in a Converging-Diverging Nozzle

SIZING AND CAPACITIES OF GAS PIPING

Experiment 8: Minor Losses

SIZING AND CAPACITIES OF GAS PIPING

Type 310A-32A Pressure Reducing Regulator and Type 310A-32A-32A Working Monitor Regulator

Technical data. Back pressure limit: 27.5% of set pressure. Capacity certification: ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code Section I and VIII

The Discussion of this exercise covers the following points:

SIZING AND CAPACITIES OF GAS PIPING Reserved

Type R622 Pressure Reducing Regulator

Case 12 Multistage Centrifugal Refrigeration System Halocarbon Refrigerant

SIZING AND CAPACITIES OF GAS PIPING

Dimensioning of Safety Valves Auditorium Tecnimont

CHAPTER 3 : AIR COMPRESSOR

AIR EJECTOR WITH A DIFFUSER THAT INCLUDES BOUNDARY LAYER SUCTION

Lab # 03: Visualization of Shock Waves by using Schlieren Technique

Paper 2.2. Operation of Ultrasonic Flow Meters at Conditions Different Than Their Calibration

The Discussion of this exercise covers the following points: Pumps Basic operation of a liquid pump Types of liquid pumps The centrifugal pump.

Micro Motion Pressure Drop Testing

TUTORIAL. NPSHA for those who hate that stuffy word. by Jacques Chaurette p. eng. copyright 2006

Process Dynamics, Operations, and Control Lecture Notes - 20

SIZING AND CAPACITIES OF GAS PIPING

HANDBOOK SAFETY DEVICES. Ed SAFETY DEVICES DS-ED 01/ ENG 1

OVERVIEW. Flow Coefficient C v. Operating Conditions. Specific Gravity

This portion of the piping tutorial covers control valve sizing, control valves, and the use of nodes.

09 - Choosing /sizing a cylinder and valve

Gas Physics Pressure and Flow Topics Covered:

STANDARD FOR CONTROL VALVE SEAT LEAKAGE

Methods of Rating Flow

SCREEN OPENINGS FOR STRAINERS

Cover Page for Lab Report Group Portion. Compressible Flow in a Converging-Diverging Nozzle

Pressure and Temperature Controls

Pressure Control. where: p is the pressure F is the normal component of the force A is the area

ENSURING AN ACCURATE RESULT IN AN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEM PART 1: UNDERSTANDING AND MEASURING TIME DELAY

Standard Operating and Maintenance Instructions for Pumping System Model PS-150

Characterizing Flow Losses Occurring in Air Vents and Ejector Pins in High Pressure Die Castings

A centrifugal pump consists of an impeller attached to and rotating with the shaft and a casing that encloses the impeller.

Operational Behaviour of Safety Valves with Constant Superimposed Backpressure

Quick Reference Technical Data

ACFM vs. SCFM vs. ICFM Series of Technical White Papers from Squire-Cogswell

Micro Channel Recuperator for a Reverse Brayton Cycle Cryocooler

CONTROL VALVE SEAT LEAKAGE

SIZING THE EXTROL DIAPHRAGM-TYPE HYDRO-PNEUMATIC TANK

THE WAY THE VENTURI AND ORIFICES WORK

SELECTION CRITERIA FOR SAFETY VALVE

Check & Demo Shielding Gas Waste. Index

T208VR Series Tank Blanketing Vacuum Regulator

Design of a Solid Wall Transonic Wind Tunnel

44 (0) E:

HANDBOOK SAFETY DEVICES. Ed SAFETY DEVICES DS-ED 01/ ENG 1

APPLYING VARIABLE SPEED PRESSURE LIMITING CONTROL DRIVER FIRE PUMPS. SEC Project No

Chapter 9 System Design Procedures

Model TB 3-16 TECHNICAL BULLETIN. Secure-Gard Pilot Operated Vent Valve (POVV) BENEFITS TYPICAL APPLICATIONS FEATURES

Lab 1c Isentropic Blow-down Process and Discharge Coefficient

SAFETY MANUAL FOR FLAMMABLE PRODUCT TRANSFER

L 100. Bubble-Tube Level System. Installation, Operation and Maintenance Instructions

Becker* Products Below Ground Ball Valve Regulators

COMPUTATIONAL FLOW MODEL OF WESTFALL'S LEADING TAB FLOW CONDITIONER AGM-09-R-08 Rev. B. By Kimbal A. Hall, PE

The Discussion of this exercise covers the following points: Range with an elevated or suppressed zero Suppressed-zero range Elevated-zero range

Types 1808 and 1808A Pilot-Operated Relief Valves or Backpressure Regulators

Expansion Tank Design (Chilled Water)

The Use of a Process Simulator to Model Aeration Control Valve Position and System Pressure

Comments on Homework. Quiz. Class 3 - Pressure. Atmospheric Pressure. 2. Gauge vs. Absolute Pressure. 1. Definitions. Temperature conversion

Cover Page for Lab Report Group Portion. Head Losses in Pipes

Pressure Measurement

Medical Gas Control Panel

MAKING MODERN LIVING POSSIBLE. Pilot operated internal safety valves type POV REFRIGERATION AND AIR CONDITIONING DIVISION.

S300 Series. Valve Link. Features. Fisher Controls

ME 333 Fluid Mechanics. Lab Session VISCOUS LOSSES IN PIPES

OIL SUPPLY SYSTEMS ABOVE 45kW OUTPUT 4.1 Oil Supply

Heat Pump Connections and Interior Piping

Research and optimization of intake restrictor for Formula SAE car engine

Correction of Pressure Drop in Steam and Water System in Performance Test of Boiler

Control Valve Sizing. Sizing & Selection 3 P 1. P 2 (Outlet Pressure) P V P VC. CONTENTS Introduction Nomenclature Calculating C v

Unit 24: Applications of Pneumatics and Hydraulics

29 SERIES - SAFETY VALVE

Comments on Homework. Class 4 - Pressure. Atmospheric Pressure. Gauge vs. Absolute Pressure. 2. Gauge vs. Absolute Pressure. 1.

Air Operated Hydraulic Pumping Systems to 50,000 psi

LOW PRESSURE EFFUSION OF GASES adapted by Luke Hanley and Mike Trenary

International Journal of Technical Research and Applications e-issn: , Volume 4, Issue 3 (May-June, 2016), PP.

North American Orifice Metering System

Noth American 7347 High Pressure Gas Regulators

Inert Air (N2) Systems Manual

Introduction. Part one: Identify the Hydraulic Trainer Components

VBS-9263 Series. Application. Features. Applicable Literature

Transcription:

BC ****** * EX * ****** DWN W.W.POWELL 4-17-75 CALCULATION OF FLOW LOSSES IN INLET CHK D.PAPA 4-17-75 AND DISCHARGE HEADERS ASSOCIATED WITH APPR APPR SAFETY RELIEF VALVES SIZE REV APPR A 02.0175.128 L APPR PAGE 1 OF 42 FORM NO. 910 J 5/93

02.0175.128 Page 2 See Revision Status Below REVISIONS REV. DESCRIPTION APPROVALS/DATE L ECN #02-0125 S.WILLIS 1-24-02 C.MORRIN 1-28-02 C.MORRIN 1-28-02 FORM NO. 915 12/96

02.0175.128 Page 3 Rev. L

02.0175.128 Page 4 Rev. L

02.0175.128 Page 5 Rev. L

02.0175.128 Page 6 Rev. L 3.0 INLET HEADERS 3.1 Limitations The method as presented in Paragraphs 3.0 and 4.0 is limited to those valves having set pressures that produce critical or choked (Ma = 1.0) flow at the valve nozzle during the relief cycles. Subsonic valves and headers are covered in Paragraph 5.0. The examples will evaluate only static and stagnation pressure. Temperature may also be determined by Fanno Lines but will not be included in this report. 3.2 Header Evaluation Evaluation of either inlet or discharge headers is accomplished by the well accepted method of Equivalent Lengths as outlined in Crane Technical Paper 410 and others. Factors which will influence flow such as entrances, elbows, tees, valves, etc. are expressed as Equivalent Lengths of Pipe. The Equivalent Length of all these pipe components is added to the actual length of straight pipe to obtain the Total Equivalent Length (Le) of the pipe. Some typical Equivalent Lengths are listed in Figures I and f (Le) II. The resistance coefficient K = is then determined d using Figure III to obtain f. 3.3 Condition One - Nozzle Area Same As Inlet Pipe Area (A length of pipe only with no valve) The pressure drop due to adiabatic frictional flow in the inlet pipe is calculated by assuming choked flow (Ma = 1.0) at the pipe (or nozzle) exit and by assuming that the inlet of the valve to the nozzle face (if a valve is used) is simply an extension of the pipe. This length is normally very short and practically can be neglected. The Mach No. at the exit may be checked from the equation: Ma =.00245 W P d 2 2 To km (Note 1)

02.0175.128 Page 7 Rev. L Where: P 2 = Static pressure at exit, psia T 0 = Stagnation temperature at inlet If the calculated Mach No. is greater than 1.0 (which cannot happen physically due to choking) the exit pressure will readjust itself so that M a2 will equal 1.0 Where the calculated Mach No. is equal to or greater than 1.0 this method is applicable. By knowing the Mach No. at the exit, stagnation pressure (Po) in the tank and properly evaluating the inlet pipe, fluid properties can be evaluated at any point in the pipe. 3.3.1 Example Anderson, Greenwood Type 273, 3 x 44, Set Pressure 490 psig (505 psia). Header is 15ft (180 in.) of 3 inch schedule 80 pipe (2.9 inch I.D.). Header to tank connection is a 12 inch to 3 inch concentric reducer (L entry = 0 from Figure II) Lading Fluid is natural gas with k = 1.3, G =.60, t o = 60 F (520 R). This condition is a comparatively rare instance and will exist only with full bore pipeline valves, such as the AGCO Series 70, USI Type D and some Farriservo Valves. On these valves, the inlet piping should either be zero length (valve mounted directly on tank) or one pipe size larger and swaged down at the valve to obtain satisfactory performance. Note that the pressure drop between the tank (1) and valve (2) is the change in stagnation pressures.

02.0175.128 Page 8 Rev. L

02.0175.128 Page 9 Rev. L

02.0175.128 Page 10 Rev. L

02.0175.128 Page 11 Rev. L

02.0175.128 Page 12 Rev. L

02.0175.128 Page 13 Rev. L 4.0 DISCHARGE HEADERS (TAILPIPES) 4.1 Theory The approach used in Discharge Headers is different from that used on Inlet Headers. The Inlet Header calculation described in Paragraph 3.0 uses two known conditions. These are 1) Tank Stagnation Pressure and 2) Mach No. at the valve nozzle (Ma = 1.0). Neither of these conditions is known to the engineer when designing discharge headers. As presented here, one must first calculate the weight flow rate of the safety valve from the normal valve sizing formula using the actual inlet condition to the valve as determined in Section 3.0. Note that again the actual coefficient of the valve K d is used. Knowing the Weight Flow Rate, W and applying the equation from Paragraph 3.3 the Exit Mach No. (Ma 5 ) can be determined by assuming P = absolute atmospheric pressure. T o is the inlet stagnation temperature. If the expression yields a Mach No. equal to one or less, the assumed exit pressure was correct. If the Mach No. calculates to be greater than one, the assumed exit pressure was incorrect. The correct Static exit pressure may be determined by letting Ma 5 = 1.0. The exit pressure may also be calculated by multiplying the assumed pressure used in the first trial by the calculated Mach No. We therefore know the Exit Mach No. (Ma 5 ) and the Exit Static Pressure (P 5 ). See Paragraph 4.3 for Ma 5 less than 1.0. Knowing these conditions, Fanno Lines can be used to determine the static pressures anywhere in the discharge header. If Stagnation pressures are desired, they may be readily obtained using the Mach No. at the Station in question and calculating the Stagnation Pressure using Figure VIII, which is a plot of k /(k 1) k 1 2 P o = P 1 + Ma (Note 2) 2

02.0175.128 Page 14 Rev. L

02.0175.128 Page 15 Rev. L

02.0175.128 Page 16 Rev. L

02.0175.128 Page 17 Rev. L

02.0175.128 Page 18 Rev. L 6) From Figure VI, the Static Pressure Ratio at the inlet to the outlet of the header for k = 1.3 and Ma 4 =.695 is: P 4 = 1.46 P * Therefore, Static Pressure at valve outlet (discharge header inlet), P 4 = P* (1.46) = P 5 (1.46) = 22.79 (1.46) P 4 = 33.24 psia = 18.54 psig 7) From Figure VIII, the ratio of Stagnation Pressure/Static Pressure at the valve outlet (discharge header inlet) for k = 1.3 and Ma 4 =.695 Is: P P o 4 = 4 1.35 Therefore, the Stagnation Pressure at the valve outlet P o4 = 1.35 P 4 = 1.35 (33.15) = 44.75 psia = 30 psig 4.3 Condition Two - Theoretical Mach No. at Discharge Header Outlet Less Than 1.0. 4.3.1 Example Anderson, Greenwood Type 2J3, Series 100 Set Pressure is 15 psig, valve nozzle diameter is 1.347 in., nozzle coefficient is.975. Discharge header is 29.5 inches of natural gas with k = 1.3, G = 0.60, C = 345 and t o 45 F. The gauge value of the discharge header inlet static pressure (P4) is used in establishing if sufficient tailpipe induced built-up back pressure could occur such that the pressure rating of the outlet connection on the pressure relief valve would be exceeded.

02.0175.128 Page 19 Rev. L

02.0175.128 Page 20 Rev. L

02.0175.128 Page 21 Rev. L 8) From Figure IV, the Mach No., Ma 4, at the inlet of the discharge header (valve outlet) for k= 1.3 and K = 11.24 is: Ma 4 =.230 9) From Figure VI, the Static Pressure Ratio from the inlet of the actual header to the outlet of the theoretical extension for K = 1.3 and M a 4 =.230 is P 4 = 4.55 P* 10) The Static Pressure at the exit of the theoretical pipe extension is: P 5 14.7 p* = = = 3.266 psia 4.5 4.5 11) The Static Pressure at the actual header inlet (valve outlet) is: P4 = 4.55 P* = 4.55 (3.266) = 14.86 psia =.16 psig 12) From Figure VIII, the ratio of Stagnation pressure to Static pressure at Station 4 for k = 1.3 and M a =.230 is: Po 4 = 1.15 P 4 Po4 = 1.15 (14.86) = 17.09 psia 2.39 psig

02.0175.128 Page 22 Rev. L 5.0 SUBSONIC FLOW 5.1 Theory In subsonic flow all valves (including the safety valve), pipe, and fittings in both the inlet and discharge headers affect the flow rate through the system (since choked flow does not exist). The approach presented here is somewhat unconventional in that after properly evaluating the equivalent lengths of all involved plumbing, the pressure loss is assumed to be linear between the static tank pressure and the static pressure into which the system is discharging (normally atmosphere). The pressure at any desired point may now be found by pressure-length ratio. Knowing the pressures existant at the valve inlet and outlet, the capacity of the valve is readily calculated by appropriate formula and the pressure drop between the valve and tank is determined by simple subtraction. This method is applicable only to installations where the tank pressure does not exceed 15 psig and where the Mach No. (Ma 5 ) at Station 5, discharge header exit, does not exceed 1.0 The Mach No., Ma 5, may be determined using the equation from paragraph 3.3, where d is the diameter of the inlet pipe (d 1, 2) and P is the absolute pressure at the discharge header exit. The inlet pipe ID must be used since the actual discharge header, being normally larger than the inlet pipe is replaced by its equivalent length of inlet pipe in the calculations. The Mach No. (Ma 5 ) in this equivalent pipe must be lower than 1.0 for the method to be applicable. This approach to subsonic headers has been verified by extensive tests at the Anderson, Greenwood ASME accepted laboratory in El Campo and agreement between measured and calculated results are within +/-2%.

02.0175.128 Page 23 Rev. L Another approach for calculating frictional piping losses is to calculate the resistance coefficient K for all pipe and fittings, adding them and calculating the flow using Darcy's equation. V = 40700 P P1 γ d1 (Note 5) 60 K T G 2 1 Where V = Volumetric flow, SCFM γ = Expansion factor for the calculated K, P and P 1 Figure X contains the resistance coefficient for AGCO Series 90 POSRV's. The expansion factor for air for various K's. P's and P 1 's is contained in Figure XI. 5.2 Method One - Equivalent L/D of Pipe, Fittings And Valve 5.2.1 Example Anderson, Greenwood 2 x 3 Type 93, set pressure 5.0 psig. L/D from Figure X is 79, Inlet Header is 45.0 inches, 2 inch schedule 40 steel pipe (2.067 in ID), Discharge Header 91 inches, 3 inch schedule 40 pipe (3.068 ID). Lading Fluid is natural gas with k = 1.3, G =.60, T o = 60 F. Valve is assumed to have remote pickup so that it is fully open at set and stays fully open irrespective of inlet pressure loss.

02.0175.128 Page 24 Rev. L

02.0175.128 Page 25 Rev. L

02.0175.128 Page 26 Rev. L 5) The Mach no. of the theoretical 2 inch discharge pipe is: Ma 5 =. 00245W To 2 P5 d km Where W = 2112 lbs./hr. P 5 = 14.7 psia, pressure at discharge header exit. d = 2.068 in., dia. of inlet pipe. T o = 520 R, Temperature of Lading Fluid k = 1.3, Ratio of Specific Heats. M = 17.38, Molecular Wt. of Lading Fluid Q d = 807 SCFM Ma 5 =.00245 (2112) 2 (14.7) (2.068) 520 (1.3) (17.38) Ma 5 =.395 Therefore this approach is applicable since Mach No. is less than one 1.0 (choked flow does not exist).

02.0175.128 Page 27 Rev. L NOTE (1) The temperature used to calculate the static discharge header exit pressure using the exit Mach No. should be the static temperature of the gas in the header. Normally this temperature is not known. Using the temperature at the valve inlet will yield reasonably accurate results. The exit static temperature could be expressed in terms of stagnation temperature and the inlet stagnation temperature used since the flow is assumed to be adiabatic. Doing this however, introduces an appreciable error when compared with actual test results because the static temperature does not decrease as much as theory would predict. To confirm the validity of using static inlet temperature, a 2J3 POSRV was flow tested at inlet pressures of 50 to 500 psig using 58 F natural gas with a specific gravity of 0.58. Table I lists the results. TABLE I INLET PRESSURE P 2 CALCULATED P 2 MEASURED (PSIG) (PSIG) (PSIG) 50 0 0 100 0 0 200 6.75 7.25 300 16.5 17.25 400 26.0 27.5 500 36.5 38.5

02.0175.128 Page 28 Rev. L

02.0175.128 Page 29 Rev. L

02.0175.128 Page 30 Rev. L

02.0175.128 Page 31 Rev. L

02.0175.128 Page 32 Rev. L

02.0175.128 Page 33 Rev. L

02.0175.128 Page 34 Rev. L

02.0175.128 Page 35 Rev. L

02.0175.128 Page 36 Rev. L

02.0175.128 Page 37 Rev. L

02.0175.128 Page 38 Rev. L

02.0175.128 Page 39 Rev. L

02.0175.128 Page 40 Rev. L

02.0175.128 Page 41 Rev. L

02.0175.128 Page 42 Rev. L