Herd size, distribution, harvest, management issues, and research priorities relevant to caribou herds in Alaska

Similar documents
Population decline in the Delta caribou herd with reference to other Alaskan herds

Investigation of Regulating and Limiting Factors in the Delta Caribou Herd

WRITTEN TESTIMONY FOR HOUSE COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES HEARING ON REPUBLICAN ENERGY BILL ENERGY SECURITY ACT JULY 11, 2001

Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Annual Performance Report of Survey-Inventory Activities 1 July June IS 0 N

Caribou Management Report of survey-inventory activities 1 July June 2006

Custodian: Dale_Bruce

Findings of the Alaska Board of Game BOG

Agreement Between the Government of Canada and the Government of the United States of America on the Conservation of the Porcupine Caribou Herd

Community Involvement in Recovering Woodland Caribou Populations: Yukon Success Stories

Findings of the Alaska Board of Game BOG

ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME STAFF COMMENTS INTERIOR REGION REGULATORY PROPOSALS ALASKA BOARD OF GAME MEETING FAIRBANKS, ALASKA FEBRUARY

Population dynamics of caribou herds in southwestern Alaska

Comparison of Documents Norton: FWS-WDC. 1. What is the Porcupine caribou herd's historic calving range?

Management Plan for the. Chisana Caribou Herd. Prepared by: Chisana Caribou Herd Working Group October 2012 > FINAL

Ecology of the Porcupine caribou herd. Rangifer, Special Issue No. 9, Kenneth R. Whitten

By: Ronald 0. Skoog Division of Game Anchorage, Alaska

Impacts of Heavy Hunting Pressure on the Density and Demographics of Brown Bear Populations in Southcentral Alaska

Mountain Caribou Recovery Implementation Plan. Predator/Prey Component. Terms of Reference

Population survey of Peary caribou (Rangifer tarandus pearyi) and muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus) on Banks Island, Northwest Territories, July 2010

oose Management Guidelines )uly 96

Cariboo-Chilcotin (Region 5) Mule Deer: Frequently Asked Questions

Early History, Prehistory

Calving distribution of Alaska's Steese-Fortymile caribou herd: A case of infidelity?

INTENSIVE MANAGEMENT OF MOOSE AT HIGH DENSITY: IMPEDIMENTS, ACHIEVEMENTS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Natality and calf mortality of the Northern Alaska Peninsula and Southern Alaska Peninsula caribou herds

Wolf Management in Alaska with an Historic Perspective

DMU 065 Ogemaw County Deer Management Unit

Peary caribou (Rangifer tarandus pearyi) and muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus) on northwest Victoria Island, Northwest Territories

2017 LATE WINTER CLASSIFICATION OF NORTHERN YELLOWSTONE ELK

Consideration for Moose Management in Ontario Northern Ontario First Nations Environmental Conference

Deer Management Unit 252

Deer and Bison Artiodactyla

AERIAL SURVEY OF BARREN-GROUND CARIBOU AT KAGALASKA ISLAND, ALASKA IN 2015

I'd like to thank the Board for the opportunity to present here today.

Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations

An Educator s Guide to Wild Caribou of North America. Case Study: Bathurst Herd

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ON RESIDENT CANADA GOOSE MANAGEMENT Questions and Answers

THE WOLF WATCHERS. Endangered gray wolves return to the American West

ELK. Alaska DePartment of fish and Game Division of Wildlife Conservation

ANNUAL REPORT

Caribou Migration, Subsistence Hunting, and User Group Conflicts in Northwest Alaska

a) Case Study: North American Bison/Wood Buffalo b) Species Diversity/Richness

Findings and Guidelines Wednesday, March 12, 2003 Page 1

Big Game Survey Results

'MOOSE. Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Wildlife Conservation

The National Wildlife Refuge System. The National Wildlife Refuge System

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Feasibility Study on the Reintroduction of Gray Wolves to the Olympic Peninsula

Deer Management Unit 152

Moose Hunting and Wolf Control in GMU 19D East, Interior Alaska

2007 Nordquist Wood Bison Inventory

Deer Management Unit 127

OIL vs. WILDLIFE Views on the ANWR Caribou Issue

COMMENTS ON ALASKA BOARD OF GAME PROPOSALS. Proposal 15. We offer the following comments on this proposal.

A SURVEY ON MOOSE MANAGEMENT IN CENTRAL ONTARIO

10.2. Nexus Between Project Construction / Existence / Operations and Effects on Resources to be Studied

2012 Wildlife Studies

White-Tailed Deer Management FAQ

GAO. ENDANGERED SPECIES Caribou Recovery Program Has Achieved Modest Gains. Report to the Honorable Larry E. Craig, U.S. Senate

CHISANA CARIBOU HERD

DMU 072 Roscommon County Deer Management Unit

Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Long history in ecology

Valdez Fish & Game Advisory Committee January 26, 2018 Valdez Council Chambers

PATTERNS OF GRIZZLY BEAR PREDATION ON CARIBOU IN NORTHERN ALASKA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

NEWS RELEASE. Harvest allocation ensures certainty for hunting sector

CAUSES OF NEONATAL MOOSE CALF MORTALITY IN SOUTH CENTRAL ALASKA

Mat Valley Fish & Game Advisory Committee October 25, 2017 MTA Building, Palmer, Alaska

The Case Against Wolf and Bear Control In Alaska

DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE S COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSALS TO BE CONSIDERED AT THE FEBRUARY 29 - MARCH 10, 2008 BOARD OF GAME MEETING IN FAIRBANKS, ALASKA

Veronica Yovovich, Ph.D. Wildlife Conflict Specialist and Science Program Director Mountain Lion Foundation

Mule and Black-tailed Deer

Mountain Caribou Recovery Implementation Plan Progress Board. Annual Report on Activities and Accomplishments of the Mountain Caribou Recovery

2015 Deer Population Goal Setting

2009 Update. Introduction

North Baffin Caribou Fall Composition/Demographic Survey, Interim and Final Report to the Nunavut Wildlife Management Board

Minnesota Deer Population Goals. East Central Uplands Goal Block

Susitna Watana Hydroelectric Project (FERC No ) Past and Current Big Game and Furbearer Harvest Analysis 2012 Technical Memorandum

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion

MAYO MOOSE MANAGEMENT UNIT

DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME JUNEAU, ALASKA. STATE OF ALASKA Bill Sheffield, Governor

Graphing population size daily Review Deer: Predation or Starvation

DMU 361 Fremont Deer Management Unit Newaygo, Oceana, N. Muskegon Counties

COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report for Grizzly Bear Western population (Ursus arctos) in Canada SUMMARY

1. What is the National Wildlife Refuge System? 2. Who started the National Wildlife Refuge System? When?

RE: Request for Audit of Ineligible Federal Aid Grants to Alaska Department of Fish & Game for Support of Predator Management

Biologist s Answer: What are your goals? Deer Management. Define goals, objectives. Manager s Question: Should I cull or shoot spikes?

Gray Wolf Prey Base Ecology in the North Fork Flathead River Drainage

Technical Rationale to Increase the Number of Satellite Collars on the Bathurst Caribou Herd

Regents Biology LAB. NATURAL CONTROLS OF POPULATIONS

Interim Report. Project Number: Project Title: Muskox Aerial Survey (Ovibos moschatus) Of the Kitikmeot Region, Nunavut.

Northern Mountain Caribou Population Dynamics Peace River Region

NATURAL CONTROLS OF POPULATIONS: 3 CASE STUDIES

DMU 056 Midland County Deer Management Unit

Port MacKenzie Rail Extension Draft Environmental Impact Statement

LITTLE SALMON AND MAGUNDY RIVERS

April Nisga a Fisheries & Wildlife Department

AN OVERVIEW OF THE UPPER KUSKOKWIM CONTROLLED CONTROLLED USE AREA AND THE USE OF MOOSE BY AREA RESIDENTS, Elizabeth Andrews and Jeff Stokes

25. RECREATION Introduction. Recreation Bristol Bay Drainages

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Copyright 2018 by Jamie L. Sandberg

Transcription:

The Seventh North American Caribou Conference, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada, 19-21 August, 1996. Herd size, distribution, harvest, management issues, and research priorities relevant to caribou herds in Alaska Patrick Valkenburg Alaska Department of Fish and Game, 1300 College Rd., Fairbanks, Alaska 99701, USA (pvalkenburg@fishgame. state, ak. us). Abstract: There are presently about 960 000 caribou in 32 herds in Alaska, including 4 herds shared with Yukon and Northwest Territories. Since complete population data were last published in the mid-1980s, Alaska's caribou population has doubled in size, largely from increases in the Western Arctic and Mulchatna herds. The number of recognized herds has increased by 6, largely because of increased use of radiotelemetry to inventory small caribou herds in inaccessible areas, and transplanting caribou to unoccupied ranges. About 33 000 caribou are harvested annually in Alaska, mostly from the Western Arctic, Mulchatna, and Nelchina herds. The primary wildlife management problem in Alaska for caribou and other species is the lack of clear management authority among state and federal agencies. Research priorities include work on the influence of short-term and long-term weather trends on nutritional ecology of caribou, and predation mitigation including sterilization, translocation, and diversionary feeding of wolves during the caribou calving period. Key words: Rangifer, population size. Rangifer, Special Issue No. 10, 125-129 Population Size and Distribution Since the last published status report on caribou in Alaska (Williams & Heard, 1986), the number of recognized herds has increased from 26 to 32 (Fig. 1, Table 1). Increased use of radiocollars, a greater effort to inventory wildlife resources in remote areas of the state, and transplanting caribou to unoccupied ranges are primary factors resulting in the increase in recognized herds. The herd definition based on use of discrete calving areas, originally proposed by Skoog (1968), continues to be useful and appropriate for management. All major caribou herds (those larger than 5 000) are censused with aerial photography of postcalving aggregations every 1 to 3 years, and minor herds are censused (total count method) during the postcalving period or during the rut as frequently as needed for management. As of the 1995 census season, there were about 960 000 caribou in Alaska including 4 herds shared with Yukon (Porcupine, Chisana, Nelchina, and Mentasta), and 1 shared with Yukon and Northwest Territories (Porcupine) (Fig. 1, Table 1). Over 800 000 of these caribou are in the 2 largest arctic herds Rangifer, Special Issue No. 10, 1998 (Western Arctic and Porcupine), and the Mulchatna Herd (Table 1). The Mulchatna Herd has been increasing at about 17% pet year since the mid- 1970s and shows no signs of slowing (Van Daele, pers. comm.). The Western Arctic Herd grew at about 13% per year from 1977 to 1990 and then began to stabilize due to decreased calf production and recruitment and increased adult mortality. Many smaller Interior Alaska caribou herds declined from 1989 to 1994 due to warmer summers, severe winters, increased predation of calves, and increased vulnerability of adults to wolf predation (Boertje et al., 1996; Valkenburg et al, 1996a). Population size of most caribou herds in Alaska is no longer significantly influenced by harvest. However, the Fottymile Herd which was once one of Alaska's most important herds, has not recovered from a population low exacerbated by overhunting in the early 1970s (Davis et al., 1978; Valkenburg et al, 1994). The distribution of most caribou herds in Alaska has remained virtually unchanged during the last 25 years. However, the prolonged increase of the 125

o Adak <s ) Fig. 1. Location of Alaskan caribou herds. Mulchatna Herd in southwestern Alaska has resulted in a doubling of range size and reoccupation of ranges, especially winter ranges, that have not been used by caribou for over a hundred years. The Western Arctic Herd has also expanded its winter range southward in the area between the Yukon River and Norton Sound. Harvest About 33 000 caribou are being harvested annually in Alaska. An additional 2 500 caribou are taken each year from the Porcupine Herd and about 100 are taken from the Nelchina Herd in Canada. About half of the caribou taken in Alaska are harvested by about 25 000 local residents in the range of the Western Arctic Herd. Alaskan caribou herds presently could support a much larger harvest, especially the Western Arctic and Mulchatna herds, but these areas are largely inaccessible to most hunters because they are roadless, aircraft landing sites are limited, and native-owned lands have been closed to access by nonlocals in northwestern Alaska. Along the road system in Interior Alaska caribou hunting opportunities have been limited in recent years because many of the mote accessible herds 126 have declined from natural factors (Boertje et ai, 1996; Valkenburg et al., 1996a), and recruitment continues to be low. The Nelchina Herd will continue to provide most of the road-accessible caribou hunting opportunity for the next several years, but it has been closed to all nonresident hunters because of state and federal subsistence priority laws. Management Issues Management authority The primary wildlife management problem in Alaska for caribou and other species is conflicting management authority between state and federal agencies. In the United States, the states have traditionally been responsible for managing resident wildlife. However, in 1980 Congress provided for a federal takeover of management of subsistence hunting on federal public lands in Alaska if the state did not provide a priority for "rural residents." Because of the "equal opportunity clause" in the state constitution the state cannot provide a "rural preference," and, consequently, the federal law and state constitution are in conflict. Because wildlife management for subsistence uses on federal lands is RangiSer, Special Issue No. 10, 1998

Table 1. Date of most recent census, 1995 population estimate and 1994-1995 harvest estimates for Alaskan caribou herds. 1994-1995 Population trend Herd Year Census 1995 Harvest since previous no. 1 Herd name of census counr Estimate estimate census 1 Adak 1993 661 1 500? 77 up 2 Andreafsky 1991 0 0 0 extirpated 3 Beaver Mountains 1993 429 200? 2 down 4 Central Arctic 1995 18 093 18 100 341 down 5 Chisana 1995 723 775 0 b down 6 Delta 1995 4 646 4 700 0 b stable 7 Denali 1995 931 2 300 0 b stable 8 Farewell-Big River 1984 700 750? 46 down? 9 Fortymile 1995 22 558 22 600 338 stable 10 Fox River 1995 83 85 0" up 11 Galena Mountain 1993 259 400 2 unknown 12 Kenai Lowlands 1995 84 90 0 b stable? 13 Kenai Mountains 1996 425 425 28 stable 14 Killey River 1995 261 290 11 up 15 Kilbuck 1993 3 682 4 216' 47 down 16 Macomb 1995 477 500 0" down 17 Mentasta 1995 739 852 0 b down 18 Mulchatna 1994 168 351 200 000 6 129 up 19 Nelchina 1995 49 808 50 281 3 579 up 20 Northern Peninsula 1995 11 500 12 000 1 273 down 21 Nushagak Peninsula 1993 1 007 1 519 35 up 22 Porcupine 1994 146 808 152 000 3 266 J stable 23 Rainy Pass 1990 231 500? 57 unknown 24 Ray Mountains 1995 1 727 1 750 12 up 25 Southern Peninsula 1995 1 434 1 550 0 b stable 26 Sunshine Mountains 1993 553 600? 0 unknown 27 Teshekpuk 1993 27 630 28 000 0' up 28 Tonzona 1991 1 101 800? 25 down 29 Twin Lakes 1995 48 50 0" up 30 Western Arctic 1993 451 067 450 000 20 000 up 31 White Mountains 1992 832 1,200 21 stable? 32 Wolf Mountain 1992 595 625? 2 unknown ' Number corresponds with number on Fig 1. k No open season. c Merging with Mulchatna. d Includes Canadian harvest. " Included with Western Arctic harvest. not separable from other management on other lands, the state and federal agencies are in conflict. Courts have issued contradictory rulings supporting opposing viewpoints, and the US Supreme Court has, so far, been unwilling or unable to address the issue. Congress must act in order to settle the issue, but state and federal politicians are caught between Rangifer, Special Issue No. 10, 1998 major constituencies and are reluctant to take the lead. In response to perceived conflicts among hunters, large areas of federal land have been closed by federal regulation to caribou hunting by "nonrural" residents even though, in most cases, data do not support allegations of conflict. Problems with management decision-making mean that caribou 127

hunting opportunities have been eliminated or are restricted to well below biological limitations. Decision-making is also becoming inefficient and costly, and management planning is impossible amid the chaos. Herd management issues For the first time the Alaska Department of Fish and Game is proposing to control the size of a major caribou herd to prevent a long-term decline. The Nelchina Herd, which numbers 50 000 to 60 000, will be reduced to below 40 000 beginning in fall 1996. Body condition and body size have been declining and peak calving time has become relatively late (Eberhardt & Pitcher, 1992; Valkenburg et al, 1996b). The 1996 harvest goal is 10 000 cows and up to 5 000 bulls. Under an experimental harvest regime, most hunters will be required to shoot a caribou with "6 antler points or less on 1 side" to prevent an overharvest of large bulls and promote harvest of cows. Road corridor closures will be used to avoid hunter crowding and allow caribou to cross roads relatively undisturbed. The Adak caribou herd, was introduced to a predator-free island in the late 1950s to provide emergency food and recreational hunting for the US Navy. The herd was kept at a relatively stable size for almost 30 years by harvest, but since the base was decommissioned the herd is increasing rapidly and will soon overgraze the island. ADF&G worked with federal agencies, native groups, and environmental organizations to remove caribou from the island. However, fear of adverse publicity is preventing allocation of money by the US Congress, and the dilemma remains unresolved. Research Priorities After major caribou herds declined in the early 1970s, using refined survey methods ADF&G intensified ecological research on caribou in cooperation with the University of Alaska and other agencies. We intensively studied several caribou herds for 15 to 20 years, including periods of population increase and decline (c.f. Adams et al., 1995; Gerhart et al, 1996; Valkenburg et al, 1996a,b; Whitten, 1996). Recent declines in Interior caribou herds were caused by increased vulnerability to wolf predation. New research priorities include: 1) determining how short- and long-term weather patterns affect caribou nutrition and vulnerability to predation; 2) developing nonlethal methods of predation management; and 3) monitoring caribou body condition. Three graduate student projects are nearing completion: 1) the influence of insects on feeding and other caribou behaviors, 2) the influence of moisture and sunlight regimes on plant nutrition and productivity, and 3) the influence of microclimate on selection of calving areas. Beginning in 1998, dominant wolves in the range of the Fortymile Herd will be neutered and subordinate wolves will be translocated to increase caribou calf survival in that herd. We will also continue experiments with diversionary feeding in the Delta Herd to keep key wolf packs from feeding on caribou calves during the critical 3-week period after calving (Valkenburg, 1997). References Adams, L. G., Singer, F. G. & Dale, B. W. 1995. Caribou calf mortality in Denali National Park, Alaska.-J. Wildl Manage. 59 (3): 584-594. Boertje, R. D., Valkenburg, P. & McNay, M. E. 1996. Increases in moose, caribou, and wolves following wolf control in Alaska. - J. Wildl. Manage. 60 (3): 474-489. Davis, J. L., Shideler, R. T. & LeResche, R. E. 1978. Fortymile caribou herd studies. Alaska Dep. Fish and Game. Fed. Aid in Wildl. Restor. Final Rep. Proj. W- 17-11. Juneau. 153pp. Eberhardt, L. L. & Pitcher, K. W. 1992. A further analysis of the Nelchina caribou and wolf data. - Wildl. Soc. Bull. 20 (4): 385-395. Gerhart, K. L., White, R. G., Cameron, R. D. & Russell, D. E. 1996. Body composition and nutrient reserves of arctic caribou. - Can. J. Zool. 74: 136-146. Skoog, R. O. 1968. Ecology of the caribou in Alaska. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. California, Berkeley. 699pp. Valkenburg, P., Davis, J. L., Ver Hoef, J. M., Boertje, R. D., McNay, M. E., Eagan, R. M., Reed, D. J., Gardner, C. L. & Tobey, R. W. 1996a. Population decline in the Delta Caribou Herd with reference to other Alaskan herds. - Rangifer Spec. Issue No. 9: 53-62. Valkenburg, P., Kelleyhouse, D. G., Davis, J. L. & Ver Hoef, J. M. 1994. Case history of the Fortymile Caribou Herd, 1920-1990. - Rangifer 14 (1): 11-22. Valkenhurg, P., 1997. Investigation of regulating and limiting factors in the Delta Caribou Herd. Alaska Dep. Fish and Game. Fed. Aid in Wildl. Restor. Final Rep. Proj. W-24-4, Study 3.37. Juneau. 45 pp. 128 Rangifer, Special Issue No. 10, 1998

Valkenburg, P., Ver Hoef, J. M. & Zarnke, R. M. Whitten, K. R. 1996. Ecology of the Porcupine Caribou 1996b. Investigation and improvement of techniques for Herd. - Rangifer Spec. Issue No. 9: 45-5 1. monitoring recruitment, population trend, and nutritional Williams, T. M. & Heard, D. C. 1986. World status of status in the Western Arctic Caribou Herd. Alaska Dep. wild Rangifer tarandus populations. - Rangifer Spec. Fish and Game. Fed. Aid in Wildl. Resror. Final Rep. Issue No. 1: 19-23. Proj. W-24-1 through W-24-4. Juneau. 53pp. Rangifer, Special Issue No. 10, 1998 129