Appendix 7. Wind and Comfort Impact Analysis

Similar documents
Subject: Wind Impact Evaluation for the Facebook Campus Project, Menlo Park

Donald Ballanti, Certified Consulting Meteorologist, Wind Impact Evaluation for the Menlo Park Facebook Campus Project, August 26, 2011.

SITE AND BUILDING INFORMATION

SITE AND BUILDING INFORMATION. March 28, 2018

Dear Ms. Maw: Qualitative Pedestrian Level Wind Assessment St-Charles Market, 135 Barrette Street, Ottawa GWE File No.

APPENDIX 11 WIND EFFECTS ASSESSMENT

Dear Mr. Nicolini: Qualitative Pedestrian Level Wind Assessment Montreal Road, Ottawa GWE File No.: DTPLW

Wellington Street : Wind Impact Qualitative Assessment. To Whom It May Concern, RE: Proposed Wellington Street Wind Impact Qualitative Assessment

March 25, Katherine Grechuta MCIP, RPP, LEED AP Planner FoTenn Planning & Urban Design 223 McLeod Street Ottawa, ON, K2P 0Z8. Dear Ms.

June 3, Mr. Steven Grandmont, Chief Operating Officer Richcraft Group of Companies 2280 St. Laurent Boulevard Ottawa, Ontario K1G 4K1

Fig$1.!Wind!Rose!Shearwater! ! August 7th, 2015

Technical Memorandum. I. Introduction and Overview. Nancy Clark Turnstone Consulting 330 Townsend Street, Suite 216 San Francisco, CA 94107

1700 Webster Street Oakland, CA. Final Report. Pedestrian Wind Conditions Consultation Wind Tunnel Tests RWDI # July 16, 2015

31/10/17. October 31, HIP Developments Inc. 700 Rupert Street Waterloo, ON N2V 2B5

Urban Design Terms of Reference. Pedestrian. Wind Comfort and Safety Studies. June 2014

2 Bowen Crescent Residential Development, Melbourne

Wind Microclimate Assessment

Assembly Committee Document 7.5

Three Springs Design Guidelines Fencing and Wall Standards

Re: Wind Impact Assessment Marina del Rey Tower Marina del Rey, California RWDI Reference No Description of Proposed Development

Arapahoe Square Zoning + Design Standards & Guidelines Task Force Meeting 9 January 27, 2016

Pedestrian Wind Impact Study for Atlantic Yard Area & Redevelopment Project NEWMERICAL TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL.

7/23/2017 VIA . Michael Hanebutt City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Boulevard, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

23/02/18. Pedestrian Wind Assessment Ladies Golf Club of Toronto Markham, Ontario Novus Project # February 23, 2018

III.A.4. Photo Simulations

Pier 8 Wave Overtopping Analysis (65 Guise Street East) Our File:

2200 FIFTH STREET CONTINUED PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW

WIND COMFORT ANALYSIS FOR ODDE

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. 350 Sparks Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. 83 East Street. Oakville, Ontario

DRAFT. A fifth objective, other considerations, has been added to capture considerations not captured by the four primary objectives.

St. Francis Drive through the City of Santa Fe Corridor Study

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

DESIGN CODE. Enterprise West Harlow London Road North Design Code 21

INTRODUCTION THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM CLASSIFICATIONS

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. 409 Brant Street. Burlington, Ontario

PHASE 1 WIND STUDIES REPORT

4.11 TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION

Highland Park Glengarry Court. Landscape design and Fencing rules

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio

Carondelet High School Athletic Fields. Walnut Creek, CA

IV. Environmental Impact Analysis B.3 Pedestrian Circulation and Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety

Incentive Zoning. Zoning Ordinance Advisory Committee June 21, Pam Thompson, Senior Planner, Sustainable Development and Construction

August 3, Bay Trail Connection With The Community

MARLWOOD GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB WASAGA BEACH, ONTARIO

APPENDIX A Urban Control Zone Corridor Study Reports

Brad Caco Group M8X 2X9. Mr. Caco: Gradient. for mitigation

Computer-Based Pedestrian Level Wind Study Scott Street. Ottawa, Ontario

300 George Street, Brisbane Pedestrian Level Winds - Wind Tunnel Test

City of Seattle Edward B. Murray, Mayor

Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Toolbox (Excerpt from Figure 3.1)

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Joshua Jester, E.I., Florida Department of Transportation, District One

SETTINGS AND OPPORTUNITIES MOBILITY & ACCESS

CHAPTER 3. Transportation and Circulation

4.11 TRANSPORTATION 4.11 TRANSPORTATION Environmental Setting Intersection, Roadway, and Freeway Evaluation Methodology

Appendix A: Safety Assessment

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. Non-NHS State Highways

Community Meeting February 27, 2007 Dorchester Avenue Transportation & Streetscape Improvements Action Plan February 27, 2007

Design Features to Change and/or Ameliorate Pedestrian Wind Conditions. Leighton Cochran 1 PhD CPEng

Community Meeting: Proposed Development 4520 Penn Ave. Notes January 30, :30-8:30pm

ALLEY 24 TRAFFIC STUDY

Figure 1: Vicinity Map of the Study Area

SOPs for Morgan County Airport 42U

S-190 Intro to Wildland Fire Behavior

12/13/2018 VIA

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. 979 Wellington Street West. Ottawa, Ontario

Local Winds & Microclimates. Unit 2- Module 1

June 11, RE: Comments on the ENF for The Boston Garden project, MEPA # Dear Mr. Sullivan:

Can Wind Energy Be Captured in New York City? Case Study on Urban Wind based on a Feasibility Study by Orange Line Studio. Spark 101 Educator Resource

Council Agenda Report

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. NHS Arterial (Non-Interstate)

Corydon-Osborne Neighbourhood Plan Recommendations

Downtown BRT Corridor Alternatives Review: 1 st, 2 nd, 3 rd and 4 th Avenue. Bus Rapid and Conventional Transit Planning and Design Services

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. Château Laurier Hotel Addition. Ottawa, Ontario

Lincoln Avenue Road Diet Trial

Appendix 5B Accessway standards and guidelines Appendix 5B Accessway standards and guidelines

5858 N COLLEGE, LLC N College Avenue Traffic Impact Study

Bridges and Arizona Crossings

Chapter Twenty-eight SIGHT DISTANCE BUREAU OF LOCAL ROADS AND STREETS MANUAL

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. Greystone Village 10 Oblats Avenue. Ottawa, Ontario

1 VicRoads Access Management Policies May 2006 Ver VicRoads Access Management Policies May 2006 Version 1.02

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

City of Walnut Creek TELEGRAPH AVENUE BART LINE SELF-GUIDED TOD TOUR 19TH STREET BART STATION

Access Location, Spacing, Turn Lanes, and Medians

TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Agenda Staff Report

Policy Statement. Objective. Context. References and Supporting Documentation

Traffic Impact Statement

Opus Research Report D Wind Tunnel Study of the Proposed Site 10 Development, Wellington

Lyons Avenue/Dockweiler Road Extension Project Draft Environmental Impact Report. Appendix I Traffic Impact Study

FONTAINE AVENUE STUDY Final Report

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. Westgate Shopping Centre Redevelopment, Phase 1. Ottawa, Ontario

Compliance with Section 18-52(4) City of Thornton Development Code

Review of Guidelines for Cycleway Safety Fencing

Sidewalk Cafe City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations

3.0 Future Conditions

Section 3.5 Transportation and Traffic

Mission-Geneva Transportation Study Community Workshop 2 July 8, 2006

Overview. Existing Conditions. Corridor Description. Assessment

Transcription:

Appendix 7 Wind and Comfort Impact Analysis

Donald Ballanti Consulting Meteorologist 1424 Scott Street El Cerrito, CA 94530 (510) 234-6087 Abe Leider Rincon Consultants 449 15th Street, Suite 303 Oakland, CA. 94612 Subject: Wind and Comfort Impact Analysis of the Proposed 2190 Shattuck Avenue Project, Berkeley Dear Mr. Leider: This letter-report summarizes my findings concerning potential wind and comfort impacts of the proposed 2190 Shattuck Avenue Project in Berkeley. I have based this analysis on a review of project plans and sections, a site visit, and my knowledge of comfort conditions and basic building aerodynamics gained from over 40 years of wind tunnel studies and analysis of building-generated wind problems throughout the Bay Area. Wind is an important factor in determing pedestrian comfort and safety. The Bay Area is noted for its cool, windy climate that, combined with frequent stratus clouds, can make outdoor space uncomfortably cool. The usability of outdoor space, parks and even the success of retail space is partially determined by wind conditions. The following analysis examines wind qualitatively. The proposed project is examined to determine where the most important factors that determine wind exposure combine to accelerate winds that can adversely affect pedestrians and users of outdoor space. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project site is a generally flat, roughly rectangular lot at the northwest corner of the intersection of Shattuck Avenue and Allston Way in downtown Berkeley. Air Pollution Meteorology Dispersion Modeling Climatological Analysis

Page 2 The site is fully urbanized, and generally level, sloping slightly downward towards the west. The site is currently occupied by a two-story retail/commercial office structure. The proposed building would be an 18-story mixed-use project with ground floor commercial/retail uses and 274 residential units on floors 2 through 18. Two levels of parking garage would be located below grade. Residential units would be accessed from a residential lobby on Allston Way. The massing would consist of a low-rise base of 7 stories that would occupy almost all the site. At the eighth level the building would step back 15 feet on the south (Allston Way) side of the building and the east (Shattuck Avenue) side of the building. This setback would continue along the north side of the building, although the setback would be only 5 feet for a portion of this building face. A mid-rise component would rise another 5 stories to a height of 120 feet. At the 12th floor the high-rise tower would extend up from the west end of the site, with the large set-back from Shattuck Avenue creating a rooftop deck. The high-rise tower at the west end of the site would reach a height of 180 feet in 18 stories. WIND SETTING Wind Climatology The project site is located directly east of the Golden Gate. As the only sea-level gap in the coastal mountains, the Golden Gate is the site of strong westerly winds for much of the year as cool marine air is brought inland by lowered atmospheric pressure created by warm temperatures in the Sacramento/San Joaquin Valley to the east. Berkeley is located at the base of the Oakland-Berkeley Hills running north-south and having a ridge line height of approximately 1500 feet. The Oakland-Berkeley Hills are a significant barrier to air flow. The Oakland-Berkeley Hills cause the westerly flow of air to split off to the north and south of Oakland. The closest source of long-term wind data to the project site is the former Alameda Naval Air Station, located about 6 miles southwest of the project site. Records from this site shows that westerly winds are the most frequent and strongest winds during all seasons. 1 This is the primary wind direction during the spring and summer months when sea breezes 1 Wind direction refers to the direction from which the wind is moving. Thus, a westerly or west wind moves from west to east.

Page 3 predominate. A secondary maxima in wind direction frequency is evident for southerly winds. This the wind direction associated with winter storms. While the average wind speed for southerly winds is not the highest of all wind directions, this is a likely wind direction of peak winds measured over the year. Calm winds occur about 9% of the time. The annual average wind speed at Alameda Naval Air Station is 7.7 miles per hour and annual average wind speed at the project site would be somewhat less than this. Site Analysis The project site is generally surrounded by commercial, public and institutional land uses. To the north of the project site is the 3-story Constitution Square building and the 179-foot tall Chase Building. A five-level parking garage is located west and northwest of the project site, and the Berkeley YMCA complex occupies the west end of the project block. The block to the south contains Hotel Shattuck, a City of Berkeley historic landmark building, whose main lobby and entrance are on Allston Way. The block is the proposed site of the 2211 Harold Way project, which would demolish two existing buildings and replace them with a proposed building that would have components of various heights, the highest portion reaching 180 feet in 18 stories. The block south and west of the project site contains the Dharma College and the Mangalam Center. Building heights in the vicinity range from two-story construction to the 12-story (173 and 180 feet, respectively) office towers at Center Street and Shattuck Avenue. The adjacent Hotel Shattuck Plaza is five stories in height. Most buildings around the project site are in the two- to five-story range. The project area has no significant terrain features and gently slopes down to the west.. The project is partially wind-sheltered by existing structures for the important westerly and southeasterly wind directions. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK CEQA guidance does not list any specific criterion for the evaluation of wind effects of a project. Two cities in the Bay Area (City of San Francisco and City of Oakland) have established both standards and criteria for the evaluation of wind impacts. CEQA significance levels in San Francisco and Oakland are based on pedestrian hazard. For the purposes of CEQA, San Francisco and Oakland have established a pedestrian wind hazard criterion of 1 occurrence per year of winds greater than 36 mph as representing a significant adverse impact.

Page 4 The above wind hazard criterion developed by San Francisco and adopted by Oakland is based on research conducted in several locations and would be appropriate for a project located in Berkeley. Since the ambient wind (undisturbed by buildings) in Berkeley seldom exceeds 36 mph, a project must substantially increase winds at pedestrian levels for this threshold to be exceeded. For this analysis, the project is considered to have a potentially significant climate impact if the exposure, orientation and massing of the structure can be expected to substantially increase ground-level winds in pedestrian corridors or public spaces near the project site. IMPACTS Generalized Effects of Buildings The construction of a building or buildings results in severe distortions of the wind field because the building acts as an obstacle to wind flow. The deceleration of wind on the upwind side of the structure creates an area of increased atmospheric pressure, while an area of decreased atmospheric pressure develops on the downwind side. Accelerated winds generally occur on the upwind face of the building, particularly near the upwind corners. The downwind site has generally light, variable winds. Where two buildings are close together, the areas of accelerated wind may overlap within the gap between the two structures. The strength of ground-level wind accelerations near buildings is controlled by exposure, massing and orientation. The potential for accelerated winds was evaluated based on a review of site exposure, building heights and building orientations to identify locations where exposure, massing or orientation to the prevailing winds would suggest that increased winds would affect pedestrian spaces. Exposure is a measure of the extent that the building extends above surrounding structures or terrain into the wind stream. A building that is surrounded by taller structures or sheltered by terrain is not likely to cause adverse wind accelerations at ground level, while even a comparatively small building could cause wind effects if it is freestanding and exposed. Massing is important in determining wind impact because it controls how much wind is intercepted by the structure and whether building-generated wind accelerations occur above-ground or at ground level. In general, slab-shaped buildings have the greatest potential for wind acceleration effects. Buildings that have an unusual shape, rounded faces or utilize set-backs have a lesser wind effect. A general rule is that the more complex the building is geometrically, the lesser the probable wind impact at ground level.

Page 5 Building orientation determines how much wind is intercepted by the structure, a factor that directly determines wind acceleration. In general, buildings that are oriented with the wide axis across the prevailing wind direction will have a greater impact on ground-level winds than a building oriented with the long axis along the prevailing wind direction. Project Impact Analysis The narrow face of the building would face west which is the prevailing wind direction. The Allston Way facade of the building would face south which is historically the direction of the strongest winds in the Bay Area. Strong westerly winds generally occur during late spring through early fall and typically peak in the afternoon. Strong southerly winds occur in winter and are associated with winter storms, and can occur at any time during the day. The west facade of the proposed building would be partially sheltered by existing parking garage and YMCA buildings that are roughly 4 stories in height. The Allston Way facade would be sheltered by the Shattuck Hotel (5 stories) and other 2 story buildings on the south side of Allston Way. The massing of the proposed project is complex. A low-rise base of 7 stories would cover almost all the site. At the 8th level the building would step back with a mid-rise element of 5 stories. The high-rise tower would extend to 18 stories at the west portion of the site. All building faces would be somewhat discontinuous, with a cut-out along the Allston Way at the west end of the site creating a small plaza, indentations creating patio decks within the low-rise base and projections creating patio decks in the mid-rise and high-rise portions of the building. For prevailing west winds, the project building is aligned with its narrow face towards the west, which would minimize the amount of wind intercepted by this building face. While this west facade is exposed to wind from the west above the fourth level, a setback in the facade at the lower levels and the adjacent parking garage deck would intercept wind any wind accelerations generated by this building face and would redirect it at a level well above pedestrian areas. For southerly winds, the low-rise base would extend a couple stories above the 5-story Shattuck Hotel to the south. Because of the limited exposure of this lower base of the building, any pedestrian wind accelerations generated by the base structure building faces would be minor. The building above the low-rise base would be completely exposed to southerly winds, but because of the building massing any wind accelerations would be located over adjacent buildings or at decks/terraces with the site itself.

Page 6 In summary, the lower tower would only be partially exposed to prevailing winds and would not be expected to significantly affect ground level winds. The upper portions of the building would be exposed to prevailing winds, but the massing of the project is such that the wind accelerations generated would be located over rooftops of adjacent buildings or at decks/terraces within the project itself. Cumulative Impact Analysis There are several developments planned or under construction near the project site. A parking garage at 2025 Center Street, in the block north of the project site is currently under construction. Naturally-ventilated parking garages generally have little wind effect as their sides are partially open so that the wind pressure differences that result in wind accelerations cannot develop, so this development would have no cumulative impacts with the proposed project. The proposed 2129 Shattuck Avenue Project is planned for the northeast corner of Shattuck Avenue and Center Street reaching 180 feet and 16 stories. Since wind effects propagate in the down-wind direction, any wind impacts of that project would not affect the project area. Under southwesterly winds, the wind shadow created by the proposed project could extend toward the 2129 Shattuck Avenue site. The cumulative effect would be a slight reduction in wind strength at the 2129 Shattuck site. The proposed 2211 Harold Way project would be located within the block directly south of the project site. This proposed building would have components of various heights, the highest portion reaching 180 feet in 18 stories. Since wind effects propagate in the downwind direction, the proposed 2190 Shattuck Avenue project would not affect wind conditions at the 2211 Harold Way site. Under southwesterly wind, the wind shadow created by the 2211 Harold Way could affect parts of the 2190 Shattuck Avenue project site. The cumulative effect would be a slight reduction in wind strength at the 2190 Shattuck site. Mitigation The project has a complex design that avoids pedestrian impacts by elevating wind accelerations above ground level. Some of these wind accelerations will occur within decks and terraces created by the project. All rooftop decks would be windy for some wind directions and would need to be carefully landscaped to reduce wind and improve usability. Porous materials or structures (vegetation, hedges, screens, latticework, perforated or expanded metal) offer superior wind shelter compared to a solid surface, and should be used to create pockets of shelter where the most sensitive uses are proposed (sitting and dining areas, for example). Vegetation, sculptures, planter boxes, fences and hedges can

Page 7 all be used to reduce winds. For safety, any outdoor furniture used on terraces that could fall over should be anchored. I hope you find this analysis useful. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Donald Ballanti Consulting Meteorologist