SETTINGS AND OPPORTUNITIES MOBILITY & ACCESS

Similar documents
summary of issues and opportunities

Magnolia Place. Traffic Impact Analysis. Prepared for: City of San Mateo. Prepared by: Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Transportation 6. A. Transit Center Circulation and Access. 1. Transit Center Circulation

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

7/23/2017 VIA . Michael Hanebutt City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Boulevard, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

WELCOME. Thank you for joining us at the Second Public Workshop for the Carlsbad Pedestrian Master Plan. We look forward to receiving your feedback.

TRAFFIC ACTION PLAN. Laurie Meadows Neighborhood CITY OF SAN MATEO

Route 7 Corridor Study

City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A

Chapter 3 BUS IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

5/31/2016 VIA . Arwen Wacht City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Blvd., 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

4.3 TRAFFIC. Introduction. Approach and Methodology

Chapter 6 Transportation Plan

June 3, Attention: David Hogan City of San Mateo 330 W. 2oth Avenue San Mateo, CA 94403

5/7/2013 VIA . RE: University Village Safeway Expansion (P13-019)

12/4/2016 VIA . RE: Grocery Outlet Del Paso (DR16-328)

Circulation and Mobility

Waterford Lakes Small Area Study

Why invest in the 1 Street S.W. Corridor?

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan

Illustrated Principles of Good Planning

This chapter describes the proposed circulation system and transportation alternatives associated with

5 CIRCULATION AND STREET DESIGN

TRANSPORTATION & MOBILITY

Focused Traffic Analysis for the 200 Nellen Avenue Project

11/28/2016 VIA

Figure 4-10: Pedestrian Improvements Types of Potential Station Area Improvements - Place-Making Improvements

6/22/2018 VIA . Darcy Goulart, Planning Manager City of Rancho Cordova Planning Department 2729 Prospect Park Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670

Executive Summary Route 30 Corridor Master Plan

Overview. Existing Conditions. Corridor Description. Assessment

CURBSIDE ACTIVITY DESIGN

Congestion Management Report

San Jose Transportation Policy

Multimodal Through Corridors and Placemaking Corridors

S T A T I O N A R E A P L A N

8/1/2018 VIA . Darcy Goulart City of Rancho Cordova Planning Department 2729 Prospect Park Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670

Defining Purpose and Need

COMMUNITY MEETING AGENDA

City of Davis East Covell Corridor Plan

SECTION 1 - TRAFFIC PLANNING

COWETA HIGH SCHOOL AND EAST HIGHWAY 51

9/22/2014 VIA . RE: Butano Apartments Pre App (PAMP )

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

ROUTES 55 / 42 / 676 BUS RAPID TRANSIT LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

complete streets design and construction standards public primer City of Edmonton

CHAPTER 4. CIRCULATION

Providence Downtown Transit Connector STAKEHOLDER MEETING #2. Stakeholder Meeting #1 October 24, 2016

MOUNTAIN HOUSE SPECIFIC PLAN I 9.1 INTRODUCTION ASSUMPTIONS TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS PHASING 9.

INTRODUCTION THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM CLASSIFICATIONS

REDWOOD CITY STREETCAR - ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

Highway 217 Corridor Study. Phase I Overview Report

Classification Criteria

C/CAG. Sunnybrae Elementary School Walking and Bicycling Audit. San Mateo-Foster City School District JUNE 2013

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

A CHANGING CITY. of Edmonton, it is essential that it reflects the long-term vision of the City.

3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

10/30/2012 VIA

6.0 PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES 6.1 INTRODUCTION 6.2 BICYCLE DEMAND AND SUITABILITY Bicycle Demand

Planning Study SR 976. Project Advisory Team Meeting May 24, 2017

B. TRANSPORTATION, CIRCULATION AND PARKING

III. Circulation A. INTRODUCTION

Key objectives of the survey were to gain a better understanding of:

9/21/2016 VIA . RE: The Knot (DR16-270)

Transportation Corridor Studies: Summary of Recommendations

3/20/2015 VIA . Teresa Haenggi, Associate Planner Community Development Department 300 Richards Blvd. Sacramento, CA 95811

Roads and Vehicular Traffic Design Principles. Roads and Vehicular Traffic Recommendations

4.13 TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

State Road 54/56 Tampa Bay s Northern Loop. The Managed Lane Solution Linking I-75 to the Suncoast Parkway

TRANSPORTATION TRAINING TOPICS. April 6, 2010

3/10/2016 VIA th Street, Suite 203 Sacramento, CA

Eliminate on-street parking where it will allow for a dedicated bus only lane %

4 COMMUNITY CHARACTER

Transportation Setting

REVIEW OF LOCAL TRAFFIC FLOW / LONG RANGE PLANNING SOLUTIONS STUDY

Vehicular and Pedestrian Access to Herndon Metrorail Station. Robert B. Boxer, Director John Stuart, Clark Nexen October 28, 2015

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

Station Plan: Penn & 43rd Avenue

David Hung, Associate Planner City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Boulevard, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA

CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO: PUBLIC DRAFT GENERAL PLAN

Cross Street Corridor Non-Motorized Enhancement Project Project Description

11/3/2017 VIA . RE: River Oaks Phase 2 (P17-051)

Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis

Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA

25th Avenue Road Diet Project A One Year Evaluation. Transportation Fund for Clean Air Project #05R07

8/31/2016 VIA . RE: Freeport Arco Fuel Station (P16-039)

Transportation, Parking & Roads

Planning Regionally With Transit

Meadow Woods Elementary School

RE: Park Plaza Walgreens (P12-016)

2016 I-30 CROSSING ARKANSAS BOULEVARD KEY IDEAS OF PLAN B:

Southside Pilot Proposal

BEAR CREEK PARK AND RIDE

Recommended Roadway Plan Section 2 - Land Development and Roadway Access

El Camino Real Specific Plan. TAC/CAC Meeting #2 Aug 1, 2018

11/3/2014 VIA . WALKSacramento has reviewed the Stockton and T Mixed-Use project at 3675 T Street in the

INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN

WELCOME Mission-Geneva Transportation Study

Duwamish Way-finding and CTR Report

SANTA MONICA BOULEVARD CORRIDOR

Transcription:

7 mobility & access how do people use el camino what is it like to drive on el camino/to park along el camino what is the pedestrian experience like what is the role of transit along the corridor what is the influence of caltrain

MOVING CONDITIONS: The total length of this segment is about 2 1/4 miles. The bulk of the traffic on El Camino is generated by the neighboring residential uses or the commercial uses located along its length. Traffic traveling the entire length of the corridor (through traffic) represents a relatively small portion of the total traffic. There are four key transportation nodes within the study segment of El Camino: the SR 92 interchange, 25th Avenue, the Hillsdale Boulevard interchange, 42nd Avenue. SETTINGS AND OPPORTUNITIES MOBILITY & ACCESS influenced traffic conditions at the four transportation nodes. With the exception of the SR 92 interchange, each transportation node is adjacent to and provides access to a retail shopping area west of El Camino. Clearly, the Hillsdale Shopping Center is the most prominent of these transportation/retail nodes. As a major regional shopping center, it attracts traffic from locations throughout San Mateo County. The retail centers at 25th and 42nd Avenues serve the adjacent neighborhoods and have a less pronounce effect on El Camino traffic levels. Figure 7.1 Traffic on El Camino Real. These nodes represent intersections with the highest cross street volumes. Each node provides a crossing of the Caltrain tracks. The limited number of railroad crossings concentrates east-west traffic on SR 92 and Hillsdale Boulevard and to a lesser degree on 42nd and 25th Avenues. Access to the regional freeway system is provided at each node, but most directly at the SR 92 and Hillsdale Boulevard interchanges. El Camino serves as a collector for SR 92 and US 101 traffic. This creates a concentration of traffic on El Camino in the vicinity of Hillsdale Boulevard and on the northern end of the project segment. Land use patterns have 57El Camino Real Master Plan

TRAFFIC CONDITIONS In looking at the traffic volumes within the study area, El Camino handles between 34,000 vehicles per day near the Belmont City limit and 55,000 vehicles per day near SR 92. While the overall volumes give a picture averaged over the day, of more concern is the way the street handles the peak traffic levels in the morning and evening rush hours. Morning peak hour volumes on El Camino range from about 2,000 vehicles per hour near the Belmont City limit to about 2,800 vehicles per hour near SR 92. Evening peak hour volumes on El Camino range from about 2,700 vehicles per hour near the Belmont City limit to approximately 3,900 vehicles per hour near SR 92. When these peak volumes are divided by the number of lanes they are spread over, there is a range of about 500 vehicles per hour near the Belmont border in the morning (2000 vehicles travelling in four lanes) to about 975 vehicles per hour in the afternoon peak near 92. If volumes begin to surpass 1,000 to 1,100 cars per hour, the road would b begin to feel congested, so for the most part, the traffic on El Camino flows well over the entire corridor. Figure 7.2 The Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes for the area surrounding the Study Area illustrate the important connection of El Camino to the large traffic volumes carried on the two freeways, 101 and 92 as El Camino Real functions as a feeder into both of these regional connections. 58El Camino Real Master Plan

Figure 7.3 The above diagrams illustrate the average peak traffic counts (per hour) in the AM peak (above) and the PM peak (below). The two peaks reflect a similar pattern with the PM volumes approximately 30% greater over the entire corridor. The diagrams show the increase in traffic volume approaching 92 and the smaller volumes passing through the Hillsdale underpass which suggests that a majority of the traffic is not travelling through the entire corridor in this area.. 59El Camino Real Master Plan

Since the retail uses along El Camino and the Hillsdale Shopping Center create higher demand during the holiday shopping season, there is a seasonal traffic demand variations. Variation in traffic demand may also be affected by school traffic. Slightly lighter traffic conditions may be experienced during the summer when schools are not in session and many people are on vacation. While the overall traffic flow may seem smooth, the challenges occur at the major cross intersection where the traffic can back up to the high volumes of vehicles entering or leaving El Camino. Levels of service (LOS) at the major signalized intersections are generally between Level of Service C and D. The intersections of El Camino with 20th Avenue, 25th Avenue and the Hillsdale Boulevard ramp intersections are the most congested in the corridor and operate at or near their adopted level of service standard. Levels of service refer to the ratio of traffic that is currently handled on the road compared to the theoretical capacity of the roadway. The ratings for the level of service work much like a report card with A being the highest score (traffic is moving unimpeded) while a level of service F is the lowest score which is given to roads and intersections where traffic is constantly stop and go. The average travel speed is about 25 to 30 mph. This means that running speeds (speeds between stops at intersections) are between 35 and 40 mph. Most vehicles can travel this segment in just over 5 minutes in the morning peak hour and about 6 minutes in the evening peak hour. Midday travel times are slightly higher, particularly in the southbound direction where travel times can be almost 7 minutes. PARKING: The strong presence of parking serving retail uses adjacent to El Camino adds to the perception of the street being dominated by automobiles. As the figure-ground diagram (7.7) shows, there is an enormous amount of land surface taken up by parking for the commercial uses. The majority of the parking exists on-street or in small to moderate size private surface lots serving specific uses. Structured parking and large surface lots provide parking for customers at the Hillsdale Shopping Center. General offstreet public parking is not provided in the corridor. Off-street parking is provided at the Caltrain Hillsdale Station and is reserved for Caltrain commuters. Figure 7.4 The majority of parking along El Camino is in the form of surface lots, as shown here near the Caltrain station. Figure 7.5 Large volumes of parking are currently accommodated in structures surrounding the HIllsdale Shopping Center. 60El Camino Real Master Plan

PEDESTRIAN CONDITIONS The pedestrian environment on El Camino is not inviting. Narrow sidewalks, obstructions, frequent curb cuts, minimal landscaping, autooriented uses, and speeding traffic alongside combine to discourage walking for most residents. Indeed, in some sections of El Camino, there is no sidewalk at all and pedestrians are compelled to walk in the street. In other areas, long crossing distances or non existent crosswalk signals make crossing El Camino difficult. Despite these many obstacles, there are pedestrians along El Camino, and often far more than one would initially suspect. There are a number of uses that generate pedestrian activity including the Caltrain station, the SamTrans bus stops, Bay Meadows, and the small-scale retail establishments near 25th Avenue. Often the people who walk on El Camino are those who are dependent on public transit and do not have other options. Others are residents of immediately adjacent areas for whom walking a few blocks is convenient. Figure 7.6 View of typical sidewalk condition along El Camino. Figure 7.7 Figure-ground drawing showing the amount of land area within the study area that is used for parking (either surface lots or structures.) 61El Camino Real Master Plan

Often pedestrians on El Camino, especially near 25th Street, have driven to the area and are walking to one or more activities in the area. Recently the 1999 State of the Bay Area Pedestrian Report cited the intersection at 37th Avenue as one of the most dangerous in the Bay Area. This portion of El Camino consists of five lanes of traffic, plus one turn lane. The total pedestrian crossing distance is 86 feet. At an assumed pedestrian crossing speed of four feet per second, it takes a pedestrian approximately 20 seconds to cross the street. With a peak hour traffic volume of almost 4600 vehicles per hour, finding sufficient gaps in traffic can be difficult. There have been five intersection-related pedestrian accidents over three years even though the pedestrian volume is not particularly high. Pedestrian conditions are important to note because they affect the long term viability and perception of the street. Smaller scale commercial uses require pedestrian access from shared parking and are often dependent on customers visiting more than one store. Similarly, the overall perception of the street is influenced by the relationship of buildings to the street parking lot frontages contribute to an overall degraded perception, buildings at the street with parking in the rear or the side often include entrances from the sidewalk. Figure 7.8-7.11 A walk along El Camino can take place within a very narrow sidewalk, or at the edge of the private property, along the curb, as well as in the street in some areas of El Camino Real. 62El Camino Real Master Plan

Future redevelopment at Bay Meadows and the Caltrain Station will bring more residents and transit-oriented uses closer to El Camino thereby encouraging more walking trips. Encouraging walking trips wherever possible will increase the long-term quality of the street by reducing short automobile trips and by making the street more inviting to all visitors. The key pedestrian issues to address are PEDESTRIAN SAFETY: Insufficient sidewalk space Lack of sidewalk in some areas Sidewalk obstacles Frequent curb cuts Large intersections with high traffic volumes Long crossing distances Infrequent crosswalks encourage jaywalking Non-signalized crosswalk PEDESTRIAN ACCESS: Sidewalks do not meet ADA requirements STREETSCAPE: Lack of amenities including landscaping Poor quality street furniture Poor quality transit facilities Architecture is automobile-oriented TRANSIT RESOURCES AND USAGE The study area is served by Caltrain rail service with stations located at Hillsdale and Hayward Park. Caltrain provides peak period service with 15 to 20 minute headways. During offpeak times the headways are approximately 50 minutes to an hour. The Caltrain at Hillsdale is one of the most used station stops along the corridor.. Bus routes 5M and 5L operate on El Camino Real over the entire El Camino Real study segment. Routes 18F, 40E, 43A, and 43G operate along a portion of the El Camino study segment. Route 7B operates between the Ralston and Hillsdale Caltrain stations. Average weekday ridership on the most popular routes in the El Camino Corridor is 3,277 passengers per day as follows: 5L = 1,338 passengers per day 5M = 980 passengers per day 7B = 959 passengers per day About 25 percent of the system-wide operating costs are recovered from the farebox (75% operating subsidy). The cost of bus shelters is either provided by SamTrans or local agencies. Advertising is not permitted on SamTrans shelters. 63El Camino Real Master Plan