Project Kickoff Meeting February 15, 2018

Similar documents
Town of Bethlehem. Planning Assessment. Bethlehem Town Board

Dr. M.L. King, Jr. Street North Complete Streets Resurfacing Opportunities HOUSING, LAND USE, AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MARCH 22, 2018

THE PHILADELPHIA COMPLETE. an overview

TRANSPORTATION & MOBILITY

A Matter of Fairness: ROCOG s Environmental Justice Protocol. What is Mobility Limitation?

WALKNBIKE DRAFT PLAN NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE

MARKET/JFK VISION ZERO PILOT PROJECT FEBRUARY 2019 EVALUATION REPORT

Memorandum. Purpose: To update the MPO CTAC on the status of the LRTP scenario evaluation process.

ADOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase IV Activities APPENDIX B PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INDEX

Building Community Partnerships for Mobility:

5858 N COLLEGE, LLC N College Avenue Traffic Impact Study

I-105 Corridor Sustainability Study (CSS)

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

10TH & 13TH STREET ROADWAY RECONFIGURATION & PROTECTED BICYCLE LANE PROJECTS

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

Draft MOBILITY ELEMENET. Community Meeting May 22, 2013

Vision Zero Task Force February 28, Collision Landscape Analysis

Community Task Force July 25, 2017

Route 7 Corridor Study

Henderson Avenue Mixed-Use Development

Paoli Road Improvement Feasibility Study

INNER LOOP EAST. AIA Rochester Annual Meeting November 13, 2013 TRANSFORMATION PROJECT. Bret Garwood, NBD Erik Frisch, DES

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan

AMENDING MOTION: Mobility Plan - Pedestrians and Disadvantaged Communities

CLOSED. The draft concept design has been broken down into 5 categories for the purpose of this survey:

City of Homewood Transportation Plan

WELCOME. Traffic & Parking Commission Special Meeting May 30, Iteris, Inc. All rights reserved.

Chapter 14 PARLIER RELATIONSHIP TO CITY PLANS AND POLICIES. Recommendations to Improve Pedestrian Safety in the City of Parlier (2014)

Community Task Force March 14, 2018

Magnolia Place. Traffic Impact Analysis. Prepared for: City of San Mateo. Prepared by: Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

5.0 Roadway System Plan

SECTION 1 - TRAFFIC PLANNING

A CHANGING CITY. of Edmonton, it is essential that it reflects the long-term vision of the City.

General Plan Circulation Element Update Scoping Meeting April 16, 2014 Santa Ana Senior Center, 424 W. 3rd Street, Santa Ana, CA 92701

122 Avenue: 107 Street to Fort Road

About the study. North Milwaukee Ave. Key goals of this study are to: Achieve Vision Zero* by. Harmonize the space and improve walkability

AGENDA ITEM NO. 5b HCAOG TAC meeting of May 8, 2014

Chapter 5. Complete Streets and Walkable Communities.

CLOSED. Highlights of the Final Concept Design:

Complete Streets Successes, Opportunities, and Challenges

Goodlettsville Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Executive Summary

North Coast Corridor:

Highway 111 Corridor Study

CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action

SR 693 (Pasadena Avenue) Corridor Study from Shore Drive South to 66 th Street

Gateway Transportation Study

Double Dutch: Bicycling Jumps in Philadelphia

Community Transportation Plan Acknowledgements

Downtown Naples Mobility and Connectivity Study. Naples City Council Presentation January 2017

Lynn Valley Town Centre Transportation Study 2013

Lord Overpass Multi-Modal Boulevard. Nicolas Bosonetto, P.E.

43 rd Avenue, Skillman Avenue Protected Bike Lanes

JULY Ridge Pike. Lower Providence Township MONTGOMERY COUNTY

4.0 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES

Albany Shaker Road Corridor Study Public Meeting # 2

Colchester/Riverside/Barrett/ Mill Intersection Study. PAC Meeting #3 September 22, 2016

Central Freeway and Octavia Circulation Study

Walmart (Store # ) 60 th Street North and Marion Road Sioux Falls, South Dakota

Welcome. If you have any questions or comments on the project, please contact:

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

BETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY

BID Strategy Group and Stakeholders Meeting. April 17, 2018

Typical Rush Hour Commute. PennyforTransportation.com

DRAFT BUENA VISTA 2020 TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Bluffdale/ UDOT South High-T Intersection Project Type Operations

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

Transportation Planning in Western SoMa

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

South King County High-Capacity Transit Corridor Study

Bridge Street Corridor Study Report

Land Use and Transportation Town Hall September 17, 2018

TRANSPORTATION TRAINING TOPICS. April 6, 2010

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

Bellevue Transportation: Challenges, Opportunities and Priorities Bellevue Downtown Association September 20, 2018

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

Bay to Bay Boulevard Complete Streets Project


CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

LSC TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. 516 North Tejon Street Colorado Springs, CO (719) FAX (719)

CITY OF LOMITA CITY COUNCIL REPORT

San Jose Transportation Policy

WELCOME Public Information Centre

Public Information Centre

CORAL RIDGE COUNTRY CLUB ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD MOBILITY MASTERPLAN

1609 E. FRANKLIN STREET HOTEL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Final Sidewalk Feasibility Study

ROADSOADS CONGESTION HAMPTON SYSTEMYSTEM MANAGEMENT. Part II Roadway Congestion Analysis Mitigation Strategies and Evaluation

Brian D. Hare, P.E. Bureau of Design PennDOT PA APA Annual Conference Investing in a Sustainable Future October 5, 2009

CONNECTIVITY PLAN. Adopted December 5, 2017 City of Virginia Beach

2016 Planning Conference July 26, CONNECT COLUMBUS Building Columbus Transportation Future

1 st and 2 nd Street Couplet FAQ s

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM

o n - m o t o r i z e d transportation is an overlooked element that can greatly enhance the overall quality of life for the community s residents.

Advancing Transportation Choices in Des Moines. MPO Environmental Roundtable January 9, 2018

Third Street Bridge & Corridor Project

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS

Transcription:

Project Kickoff Meeting February 15, 2018

Scope of Work: Study Area

Project Goals Develop traffic calming alternatives to the Vine Street local right of way, to mitigate speeding. Develop concept plans and evaluate the feasibility of lane reconfiguration and other treatments. Develop recommendations to facilitate safe transportation for all modes and users while supporting a vibrant community.

USDOT Every Place Counts (2016)

Chinatown Neighborhood Plan (2017) CONNECTIVITY 2.1 Bridge the community across Vine Street and the expressway 2.2 Make it safer and easier to walk and bike 2.3 Improve connections to transit 2.4 Create an inviting and beautiful public realm

Chinatown Neighborhood Plan (2017) OPEN SPACE 3.1 Create more public space and programming for community use 3.2 Improve access to existing and new spaces

Chinatown Connections (2017) 1 Make crossing the street along Race and Vine Streets safer for the 1000 s of seniors and children who cross every single day. 2 Create two to three safe routes to parks and public spaces. 3 Provide support to local organizations to regularly activate public spaces in and around Chinatown. Mapping Activities

Vision Statement Reviving Vine will increase neighborhood connections by enhancing multimodal, inclusive mobility options in the Vine Street corridor. By improving safety and rebalancing roadway uses, the project will empower residents and visitors to reclaim Vine Street as public space for all users.

Scope of Work: Key Tasks 1 Collect and Analyze Data 2 Model Existing Conditions and No Build Scenario 3 Develop Improvement Alternatives 4 Analyze Improvement Alternatives 5 Public Engagement 6 Report

Task 1: Collect and Analyze Data

Study Area

Existing Land Use DVRPC 2015

New Developments in Study Area City Planning Commission 2017, City of Philadelphia 2016, DVRPC 2018

Census Tracts 2010 Census

Category Census Tract 2 (from Vine to Arch St) Census Tract 376 (from Vine to Spring Garden to Green St) Regional Threshold Population Estimate 2,304 2,736 N/A DVRPC Indicators of Potential Disadvantage (IPD) 5 5 N/A Non Hispanic Minority (%) 59.5% 48.9% 28.36% Hispanics 0.0%* 0.0%* 9.09% Carless Households ( Transit Dependent ) 45.6% 41.2% 14.25% Limited English Proficiency 22.5% 16.3% 3.44% Households in Poverty 22.4% 27% 12.78% Elderly (75 years and older) 8.0% 2.6% 6.55% Persons with Disabilities 6.3% 13% 12.14% Female Head of Household with Child 0.0%* 7.4% 8.69% Indicators of Potential Disadvantage ACS 2015 5-Year Estimates, DVRPC Indicators of Potential Disadvantage Webmap

59% 59% 42% 30% 26% 32% 19% 4% 2% 1% 8% 7% 5% 4% 1% Car, Truck, or Van Public Transportation Bicycle Walk Other Workers 16+ Living in Study Area Workers 16+ Living in Philadelphia Workers 16+ Employed in Study Area Commuting Patterns Census Transportation Planning Products (CTPP) 2010 5-Year Data

Sidewalk Infrastructure DVRPC December 2017

Weekday Pedestrian Volume by Intersection DVRPC Traffic Counts, February 2017

Weekday Pedestrian Volume by Crosswalk DVRPC Traffic Counts, February 2017

Bicycle Lanes Philadelphia Streets Department 2014, DVRPC 2018

Weekday Bicycle Volume by Crosswalk DVRPC Traffic Counts, February 2017

Average Weekday Transit Boardings and Alightings SEPTA 2016, NJ Transit 2018

Parking Capacity Philadelphia City Planning Commission 2015, DVRPC 2017

Parking Violations DVRPC 2017, weekday field observations

Weekday Vehicle Speed and Volume Counts DVRPC Traffic Counts, October 2017

Weekday Peak Vehicle Turning Movements DVRPC Traffic Counts, February 2017. AM Peak: 8:00-9:00AM. PM Peak: 4:45-5:45PM.

Task 1 Takeaways Safety, accessibility, walkability Traffic calming particularly on Vine West Pedestrian improvements on 8 th, 10 th, and 13 th Bike lane improvements and connections

Task 2: Model Existing Conditions and No Build Scenarios

Existing Conditions: Level of Service

Future No Build Scenario Applied background traffic growth factor Horizon year 2025

Background Traffic Growth Factors Federal Functional Class Study Area Street Segments Average Annual Traffic Growth (Forecasted) Total Traffic Growth 2017 2025 (Forecasted) Minor Arterial Vine Street East and West 13th Street from Race to Vine 12th Street from Race to Callowhill 11th Street from Race to Callowhill 0.66% 5.28% Major Collector 13th Street from Vine to Callowhill 10th Street from Race to Callowhill 9th Street from Race to Callowhill 8th Street from Race to Callowhill 0.53% 4.24% Other Principal Arterial Broad Street from Race to Callowhill 0.41% 3.24%

Future No Build (2025): Level of Service

Future No Build with Developments Applied background traffic growth factor Horizon year 2025 Estimated trip generation from new developments Applied trips to model

Future No Build with Developments (2025): Developments Considered for Trip Generation

Estimated Trips Generated Location Residential Units Commercial SF Estimated Trips Generated: Weekday AM Peak Estimated Trips Generated: Weekday PM Peak 10th Street and Vine West 150 45,000 98 104 1001 Ridge Avenue 48 2,900 56 161 900 34 Callowhill Street 142 14,000 41 113 323 North 13th Street 97 0 20 28 339 North Broad Street (complete) 110 6,000 39 65 322 44 North Broad Street (complete) 256 11,000 72 115 Total 803 78,900 326 586

Future No Build with Developments (2025): Level of Service

LOS Summary Table Intersection Existing AM No Build No Build with Developments Existing PM No Build No Build with Developments Vine EB & Broad C C C C C D Vine EB & 13th B B B B B B Vine EB & 12th B B B B B B Vine EB & 11th B B B B B B Vine EB & 10th A A A B B B Vine EB & 9th A A A A A B Vine EB & 8th D D D C D D Vine WB & Broad C D D C C C Vine WB & 13th B B C B B B Vine WB & 12th B B C B B B Vine WB & 11th A A B B B B Vine WB & 10th A B B B B B Vine WB & 9th A A A A A A Vine WB & 8th B B B B C C

Task 2 Takeaways LOS lowest at: Broad and Vine West Broad and Vine East 8 th and Vine East Capacity reduction may be feasible

Task 3: Develop Improvement Alternatives

Potential Improvements Lane reconfiguration East/west North/south Signal timing Street geometry Other? Key locations Constraints Plans

Public Meeting Purpose Invitees Potential Dates (April 9, 10, 11, 12, 13)

Next Steps Meeting notes Finalize/promote public meeting Tasks 3/4: Develop/analyze improvement alternatives