Safety impacts of red light running photo enforcement at urban signalized intersections

Similar documents
Review of A Detailed Investigation of Crash Risk Reduction Resulting from Red Light Cameras in Small Urban Areas by M. Burkey and K.

Relationship of Road Lane Width to Safety for Urban and Suburban Arterials

Bhagwant N. Persaud* Richard A. Retting Craig Lyon* Anne T. McCartt. May *Consultant to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety

Safety Assessment of Installing Traffic Signals at High-Speed Expressway Intersections

4/27/2016. Introduction

INSURANCE INSTITUTE FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY 1005 NORTH GLEBE ROAD ARLINGTON, VA PHONE 703/ FAX 703/

Effects of Traffic Signal Retiming on Safety. Peter J. Yauch, P.E., PTOE Program Manager, TSM&O Albeck Gerken, Inc.

Introduction 4/28/ th International Conference on Urban Traffic Safety April 25-28, 2016 EDMONTON, ALBERTA, CANADA

NCHRP Improved Prediction Models for Crash Types and Crash Severities. Raghavan Srinivasan UNC Highway Safety Research Center

SAFETY IMPACTS OF THE ACTUATED SIGNAL CONTROL AT URBAN INTERSECTIONS

HSIS. Association of Selected Intersection Factors With Red-Light-Running Crashes. State Databases Used SUMMARY REPORT

Analysis of Signalized Intersection Crashes Nasima Bhuiyan, EmelindaM. Parentela and Venkata S. Inapuri

EFFECTIVENESS OF AUTOMATED ENFORCEMENT SYSTEM (AES) IN

Recently Developed Intersection CMFs. Nancy Lefler, VHB ATSIP Traffic Records Forum, 2014

INSURANCE INSTITUTE FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY 1005 NORTH GLEBE ROAD ARLINGTON, VA PHONE 703/ FAX 703/

Analyzing the Effect of All- Red Intervals in Crash Reduction: A Case Study of Heckman Correction at Urban Signalized Intersection Crashes

Crash Data Analysis for Converting 4-lane Roadway to 5-lane Roadway in Urban Areas

Title of the proposed project Development of a Toolbox for Evaluation and Identification of Urban Road Safety Improvement Measures

Safety and Design Alternatives for Two-Way Stop-Controlled Expressway Intersections

An Application of Signal Detection Theory for Understanding Driver Behavior at Highway-Rail Grade Crossings

A Traffic Operations Method for Assessing Automobile and Bicycle Shared Roadways

Safety Impacts of Road Diets in Iowa

Appendix A: Safety Assessment

Chapter 5 DATA COLLECTION FOR TRANSPORTATION SAFETY STUDIES

To Illuminate or Not to Illuminate: Roadway Lighting as It Affects Traffic Safety at Intersections

Evaluation of the Safety Effectiveness of the Conversion of Two-Lane Roadways to Four-Lane Divided Roadways

MULTIMODAL INJURY RISK ANALYSIS OF ROAD USERS AT SIGNALIZED AND NON- SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS

Phase I-II of the Minnesota Highway Safety Manual Calibration. 1. Scope of Calibration

An Analysis of the Travel Conditions on the U. S. 52 Bypass. Bypass in Lafayette, Indiana.

Defining Purpose and Need

Potential Factors Affecting Roadway Departure Crashes in Oahu, Hawaii

Statement before the Maryland Senate Committee on Judicial Proceedings on Senate Bill 277. Research on Automated Speed Enforcement. Stephen L.

Performance-Based Approaches for Geometric Design of Roads. Douglas W. Harwood MRIGlobal 3 November 2014

Safety Effectiveness of Pedestrian Crossing Treatments

Characteristics of Traffic Accidents in Highway Work Zones

Colorado Department of Transportation Crash Data Program Alisa Babler, PE

Benefits of Center Line Rumble Strips on Rural 2-Lane Highways in Louisiana

Safety Performance of Two-Way Stop-Controlled Expressway Intersections

Traffic Parameter Methods for Surrogate Safety Comparative Study of Three Non-Intrusive Sensor Technologies

INFLUENCE OF TRAFFIC FLOW SEPARATION DEVICES ON ROAD SAFETY IN BRAZIL S MULTILANE HIGHWAYS

Access Location, Spacing, Turn Lanes, and Medians

CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW

The Impact of Narrow Lane on Safety of the Arterial Roads. Hyeonsup Lim

PRELIMINARY DRAFT FIRST AMENDMENT TO VISION 2050: A REGIONAL LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN

Development of a Procedure for Estimating the Expected Safety Effects of a Contemplated Traffic Signal Installation

Results from NCHRP 3-65: Applying Roundabouts in the United States

The Effect of Pavement Marking on Speed. Reduction in Exclusive Motorcycle Lane. in Malaysia

Rational road safety management Practice and Theory. Bhagwant Persaud Ryerson University Toronto, Canada

Safety Evaluation of Intersection Safety Camera Program in Edmonton

Collision Estimation and Cost Calculation

Evaluation of Transverse Rumble Strips at Stop Controlled Intersections

Evaluation of Safety Effectiveness of Composite Shoulders, Wide Unpaved Shoulders, and Wide Paved Shoulders in Kansas

An Analysis of Reducing Pedestrian-Walking-Speed Impacts on Intersection Traffic MOEs

Recent U.S. Research on Safety Evaluation of Low-Cost Road Engineering Safety Countermeasures Lessons for Canada

Drivers Behavior at Signalized Intersections Operating with Flashing Green: Comparative Study

EVALUATING THE SAFETY EFFECTS OF DAYLIGHT SAVINGS TIME ON FATAL AND NON-FATAL INJURY CRASHES IN TEXAS

Calibration and Transferability of Accident Prediction Models for Urban Intersections

Crash Analysis of I-64 Closure in St. Louis County

The evaluation of road safety performances in urban areas

Development of Decision Support Tools to Assess Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety: Development of Safety Performance Function

SAFETY EFFECTIVENESS OF HIGH-SPEED EXPRESSWAY SIGNALS. Sponsored by the Iowa Department of Transportation Offi ce of Traffic and Safety

Appendix A Literature Review

NMSU Red Light Camera Study Update

Statement before the Ohio House Committee on Transportation, Public Safety, and Homeland Security. Red Light Camera Research. Stephen L.

Integrating Safety into the Transportation Decision Making Process

Pedestrian Accidents in Utah

TRAFFIC SIGNALS OR ROUNDABOUT AT THIS UNUSUAL INTERSECTION?

Approach-Level Real-Time Crash Risk Analysis for Signalized Intersections

ROUNDABOUT MODEL COMPARISON TABLE

BLOSSOM AT PICKENS SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT STUDY

Estimating Safety by the Empirical Bayes Method: A Tutorial.

ENHANCED PARKWAY STUDY: PHASE 2 CONTINUOUS FLOW INTERSECTIONS. Final Report

Safety Evaluation of Flashing Beacons at STOP-Controlled Intersections

Potential Safety Effects of Lane Width and Shoulder Width on Two-Lane Rural State Highways in Idaho

INTERSECTION SAFETY RESEARCH IN CRACOW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

Florida s Intersection Safety Implementation Plan (ISIP)

International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN (Print), AND TECHNOLOGY (IJCIET)

Yellow and Red Intervals It s Just a Matter of Time. 58 th Annual Alabama Transportation Conference February 9, 2015

Analysis of Signalized Intersection Crashes

FHWA Safety Performance for Intersection Control Evaluation (SPICE) Tool

Evaluation of Interactive Highway Safety Design Model Crash Prediction Tools for Two-Lane Rural Roads on Kansas Department of Transportation Projects

A Novel Approach to Evaluate Pedestrian Safety at Unsignalized Crossings using Trajectory Data

Analysis of Run-Off-Road Crashes in Relation to Roadway Features and Driver Behavior

Lessons Learned from the Minnesota County Road Safety Plans. Richard Storm CH2M HILL

MODELING TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS IN THE CITY OF NORFOLK, VA

EVALUATION OF METHODOLOGIES FOR THE DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF FREEWAY WEAVING SECTIONS. Alexander Skabardonis 1 and Eleni Christofa 2

Research Article Safety Impacts of Push-Button and Countdown Timer on Nonmotorized Traffic at Intersections

Study on fatal accidents in Toyota city aimed at zero traffic fatality

Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA

Statement before the Maryland House Environmental Matters Committee. HB 443 Automated Speed Enforcement. Stephen L. Oesch

Crash Patterns in Western Australia. Kidd B., Main Roads Western Australia Willett P., Traffic Research Services

Reduction of Speed Limit at Approaches to Railway Level Crossings in WA. Main Roads WA. Presenter - Brian Kidd

Appendices to Final Report

appendix b BLOS: Bicycle Level of Service B.1 Background B.2 Bicycle Level of Service Model Winston-Salem Urban Area

Memorandum 1. INTRODUCTION. To: Cc: From: Denise Marshall Northumberland County

Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report

Statement before the Maryland Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee. Automated Speed Enforcement. Stephen L. Oesch

HSM Tables, Case Studies, and Sample Problems Table of Contents

MANAGEMENT OF SPEEDING COMPARING TWO APPLIED ENGINEERING MEASURES

Driver Behavior Characteristics at Urban Signalized Intersections

Transcription:

Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering English Edition 2014 1 5 309-324 Safety impacts of red light running photo enforcement at urban signalized intersections Yongdoo Lee 1 Zongzhi Li 1 * Shengrui Zhang 2 Arash M. Roshandeh 3 Harshingar Patel 1 Yi Liu 1 1 Department of Civil Architectural and Environmental Engineering Illinois Institute of Technology Chicago Illinois USA 2 School of Highway Chang an University Xi an Shaanxi China 3 School of Civil Engineering Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana USA Abstract Red light running at signalized intersections is a major safety concern in the United States. Statistics show that approximately 45 percent of crashes at intersections caused by red light running result in severe injuries and fatalities while only approximately 30 percent of all other types of intersection crashes cause injuries or fatalities. Over the past decade many US cities and counties have deployed red light running photo enforcement systems for signalized intersections w ithin their jurisdictions to potentially reduce red light running related crashes. This study proposes an empirical Bayesian EB before-after analysis method that computes a w eighed sum of crashes observed in the field and crashes predicted by safety performance functions SPFs to mitigate regression-to-mean biases for analyzing crash reduction effects of red light running enforcement. The analysis explicitly considers red light running related crash types including head-on rear-end angle turning sideswipe in the same direction and sideswipe in the opposite direction and crash severity levels classified as fatal injury and property damage only PDO. A computational study is conducted to examine the effectiveness of the Chicago program w ith red light running photo enforcement systems deployed for nearly tw o hundred signalized intersections. It is revealed that the use of red light running photo enforcement on the whole is positive as demonstrated by reductions in all types of fatal crashes by 4-48 percent and injury-related angle crashes by 1 percent. However it slightly raises PDO-related angle crashes and moderately increases injury and PDO related rear-end crashes. The safety effectiveness of red light running photo enforcement is sensitive to intersection location. Key words signalized intersection red light running safety impact empirical bayesian method 1 Introduction Red light running at signalized intersections is a major safety concern in many countries as it often results in fatalities and severe injuries. This could be attributable to the driver behavior as it has been observed in * Corresponding author Zongzhi Li PhD Associate Professor. E-mail lizz@ iit. edu.

310 Yongdoo Lee et al. many cases that w hen anticipating a signal phase change the drivers choose to accelerate instead of braking to decelerate. They presume that accelerating upon seeing the yellow signal w ill ensure to pass through the intersection before the signal turns to red. However their judgments might not be correct that consequently lead to red light running. A study by Fitzsimmons et al. 2007 revealed that red light running crashes account for 21 percent of total and more than 35 percent of fatal and major injury crashes at signalized intersections. A nationw ide study of fatal crashes at signalized intersections in 1999 and 2000 estimated that 20 percent of the vehicles involved failed to obey the signals Campbell et al. 2004. As a countermeasure to potentially mitigate red light running related crash concerns photo enforcement has been gradually introduced in various countries. For instance intersection photo enforcement systems have been adopted in Australia Canada and Israel since the 1970s Ng et al. 1997 Retting et al. 1999 Vinzant and Tatro 1999 Retting et al. 2003. In the United States intersection photo enforcement systems began to be deployed in cities of Los Angles and New York in early 1990s to help photograph document and prosecute the offending drivers so as to discourage red light running. As part of the Federal Highway Administration FHWA demonstration project the Polk County Florida deployed photo traffic enforcement in 1994 and an 8 percent reduction in total crashes w as observed at signalized intersections after installing red light running photo enforcement systems while in the same period the statewide average of crash occurrences increased by 5 percent Burris and Apparaju 1998 McFadden and McGee 1999 Smith et al. 2000. Fleck and Smith 1999 evaluated red light running photo enforcement operated in San Francisco California since 1996 and found that fatal crashes decreased by 50 percent and injury crashes decreased by 9 percent. Retting et al. 1998 observed that the red light running photos helped decrease red light violations by 42 percent at Oxnard California. Further Retting and Kyrychenko 2002 analyzed the same set of crash data and found that after installing the red light photo enforcement systems the total number of crashes at all signalized intersections reduced by 7 percent injury crashes decreased by 29 percent right-angle crashes decreased by 32 percent and injury-related right-angle crashes decreased by 68 percent. Synectics Transportation Consultants 2003 evaluated the red light camera enforcement program in Ontario Canada based on fiveyear data and concluded that the pilot project was successful in reducing fatal and injury crashes at intersections. However it was revealed that PDO crashes increased moderately leading to an increase in the total number of crashes by 16 percent. Kriz et al. 2006 concluded that the installation of red light running photo enforcement reduced red light running related crashes by 60 percent for Milwaukee Wisconsin. Fitzsimmons et al. 2008 observed that on an average intersection approaches w ithout red light running cameras experienced 25 times more red light running violations than approaches w ith cameras and a reduction in the total crashes by 44 percent at the camera enforced intersections w as also observed. Similar trends w ere observed by studies conducted by Schneider 2010 Bochner and Walden 2010. While intersection crash reductions w ere achieved for most of the deployed red light running photo enforcement systems exceptions were also found. For instance a study led by Burkey and Obeng 2004 concluded that the total number of crashes increased by 40 percent after installing the red light running cameras at major signalized intersections in Greensboro North Carolina. In particular fatal crashes were found to have decreased slightly but injury crashes increased by 40 percent to 50 percent. 2 Motivation and overview of the proposed framework Although a multitude of methods have been utilized in the previous studies to assess the safety impacts of red light running photo enforcement all of the studies employed different but relatively small sample sizes of photo enforced intersections coupled with a few years of crash data for the before and after photo enforcement periods for analyses. The significance of diverse results obtained in the past research is somehow questionable. The National Cooperative Highw ay Research Program NCHRP 2003 and Hauer

Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering English Edition 311 1997 suggested that the empirical Bayesian EB before-after analysis method be used for the safety impacts analysis to mitigate the regression-to-mean biases when dealing with crash data available for a relatively short time period Lindley and Smith 1972 Long 1997 Cameron and Trivedi 1998 Hauer et al. 2002 Lum and Halim 2006 Persaud and Lyon 2007 Madanu et al. 2009 Persaud et al. 2010 Roshandeh et al. 2014. Nonetheless at least threeyear data should be used for the before and after periods respectively to draw meaningful inferences. This study benefits from the EB method for safety impacts analysis but it goes one step beyond the existing studies by applying an EB method for assessing the potential for safety improvements of intersection photo enforcement using a large data set. Specifically an EB method is introduced and applied to multi-year data on approximately 1000 signalized intersections in Chicago w ith red light running photo enforcement deployed for over 190 intersections to analyze the safety impacts of the deployed photo enforcement. The proposed EB method and findings of the method application using a large data set could potentially help agencies in deploying new or expanding existing red light running photo enforcement programs. 3 Outline The remainder of this paper is organized as follows Section 4 presents the proposed EB before-after analysis method used for evaluating the effectiveness of red light photo enforcement. In Section 5 a computational study is conducted to apply the proposed method using a long period of large crash data set. Section 6 summarizes the current study and draw s concluding remarks and outlines agencies that could potentially benefit from the proposed EB method for assessing the safety impacts of intersection red light photo enforcement and study findings in the process of considering photo enforcement deployments. 4 Proposed methodology 4.1 General The proposed EB-based analytical steps for quantifying the safety impacts of intersection red light running photo enforcement is illustrated in Fig. 1 below which is measured by changes in red light running related crashes after installing the enforcement cameras. First the signalized intersections are classified into three groups i signalized intersections without signal modernization and red light running photo enforcement untreated ii signalized intersections w ith both signal modernization and red light running photo enforcement installed Type I treated and iii signalized intersections with signal modernization only Type II treated. Next SPFs are calibrated using data on untreated intersections. Then the EB adjusted crash frequency as a weighed sum of field observed and SPF predicted crash frequencies is calculated for each of the Type I and Type II treated intersections for the before and after treatment periods. For a Type I or Type II treated intersection the change in crash frequencies in the after treatment period had it not been treated is computed. Subsequently the average level of changes in crash frequencies for either Type I or Type II treated intersections is established. Finally the difference between the two average values of crash frequency changes is regarded as the safety impacts of intersection red light photo enforcement. The safety impacts are separately assessed by red light running related crash type and crash severity level. 4.2 Intersection SPFs The execution of the proposed EB method involves utilizing SPFs to predict intersection crashes for the Type I or Type II treated intersections for the before treatment period. Since both Type I and Type II treated intersections in the before treatment period retain untreated the dataset associated w ith untreated intersections needs to be employed to calibrate SPFs for crash predictions in the before treatment period. The main efforts involved include selection of the response variable representative explanatory variables and appropriate model types Jovanis and Chang 1985. For the selection of the response variable the vehicle crash rate and crash frequency are both used in the current practice. However the use of the crash rate assumes a linear relationship betw een crash occurrences and the traffic exposure which is inconsistent w ith the field observations for intersections accommo-

312 Yongdoo Lee et al. dating very high or low traffic volumes Kononov and Janson 2002 Kononov 2002 Kononov and Allery 2003 Qin et al. 2005. To overcome this limitation the crash frequency is utilized instead as the response variable to address the non-linearity relationship betw een crash occurrences and the traffic exposure. In this study the vehicle crash frequency in terms of injury property damage only PDO and total crashes per intersection per year is selected as the response variable for SPF development. Fig. 1 Main steps of proposed EB before-after analysis method The explanatory variables for predicting intersection vehicle crashes are mainly associated w ith the traffic exposure geometric design and traffic operations control AASHTO 2010. The traffic exposure is typically represented by Annual Average Daily Traffic AADT utilizing the intersection major and minor approaches. Geometric design elements mainly include number of through left-turn and right-turn lanes width and median type and width. Crash contributing factors in the context of traffic operations control may cover speed limit one-way versus twoway operation and access control. All these variables are considered as candidate explanatory variables for SPF calibration in the current study. As documented in the 2010 Highw ay Safety Manual AASHTO 2010 various Poisson and negative binomial models have been developed over the years for intersection crash predictions Chin and Quddus 2003 Ivan 2004 Guo et al. 2010. The Poisson or negative binomial models may exhibit a null crash oc-

Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering English Edition 313 currence such as fatal crashes over a large number of 4.4 EB-adjusted Intersection crash frequencies for the after treatment period intersections for a given time period. In such cases the zero-inflated Poisson or zero-inflated negative binomial models are introduced Lord et al. 2005 For an intersection receiving either Type I treatment 2007 Li et al. 2008. Moreover zero-state Markov sw itching count-data models have been introduced to allow for direct statistical estimation of normal-count or Type II treatment the EB-adjusted crash frequency from the before treatment period is used to establish EB-adjusted crash frequency for the after treatment period. The computation considers changes in traffic state for zero-crash intersections Malyshkina and volumes betw een before and after treatment periods. Mannering 2010. Poisson negative binomial zeroinflated Poisson and zero-inflated negative binomial The EB-adjusted crash frequency in the after treatment period is calculated as below models are considered as candidate modeling techniques in the present study. Σ M AADT i m major + AADT i m minor m = 1 EB i A = EB i B 3 4.3 EB-adjusted intersection crash frequencies in the before Σ N AADT i n major + AADT i n minor treatment period n = 1 w here EB i A is EB -adjusted crash frequency for intersection i in the after treatm ent period had the For a Type I or Type II treated intersection the EBadjusted crash frequency in the multi-year before treatment period that corrects for the regression-tomean bias is computed as follow EB i B = w i P i B + 1- w i O i B 1 where EB i B is the EB-adjusted crash frequency for intersection i in the multi-year before treatment period w i is the determined weight factor for intersection i P i B is the predicted crash frequency at intersection i in the before treatment period and can be estimated using historical crash data and appropriate safety performance functions SPFs O i B is the total number of crashes observed at intersection i in the before treatment period. For this analysis the longer the observations are made the smaller the weight factor indicating that the EB-adjusted crash frequency w ill be w eighted more tow ards the field observed crashes. The weight factor w i for intersection i is established on the basis of the overdispersion parameter determined in the process of calibrating the SPFs as represented in Eq. 2 1 w i = 2 1 + α N P i B w here α is the over-dispersion parameter for crash frequency per intersection per year and varies for each intersection depending upon the type use and location AASHTO 2010. treatment not been implemented AADT i AADT i n m inor AADT i m n m ajor are m ajor and AADT i m m inor AADT for intersection i on major and minor approaches in the before and after treatment periods. 4.5 Red light running related crash type The EB-adjusted fatal injury and PDO crash frequencies at an intersection in the multi-year after treatment period represent the number of crashes that can be expected had the treatment not been implemented. Regardless of Type I or Type II treatment only some types of fatal injury and PDO crashes are potentially affected by red light running photo enforcement. These may include the following head-on crashes angle crashes with a vehicle in the opposite direction turning crashes with a vehicle in the opposite direction sideswipe crashes with a vehicle in the same direction for multilane intersections SW-S and sideswipe crashes with a vehicle in the opposite direction SW-O. The reductions in red light running related types of crashes for a Type I or Type II treated intersection i due to photo enforcement are computed as follows Δ i A F = EB i A F - O i A F r i A F 4 Δ i A I = EB i A I - O i A I r i A I 5 Δ i A P = EB i A P - O i A P r i A P 6 where Δ i A F Δ i A I and Δ i A P are reductions in red light running related types of fatal injury and PDO

314 Yongdoo Lee et al. crashes for a Type I or Type II treated intersection i in the after treatment period EB i A F EB i A I and EB i A P are EB-adjusted fatal injury and PDO crash frequencies for a Type I or Type II treated intersection i in the after treatment period had the treatment not been implemented O i A F O i A I and O i A P are number of fatal injury and PDO crashes observed for intersection i in the after treatment period and r i A F r i A I and r i A P are proportions of red light running related types of fatal injury and PDO crashes for intersection i in the after treatment period. 4.6 Comparability assessments of Type Ⅰ and Type Ⅱ treated intersections After estimating the reductions in red light running related types of fatal injury and PDO crashes for Type I and Type II treated intersections in the after treatment period the intersections are categorized into comparable groups to estimate the safety impacts. Specifically the intersections are grouped by AADT <40000 40000-50000 > 50000 and by number of through movement lanes in the major approach per direction to ensure the Type I and Type II treated intersections in each group are comparable in the traffic exposure and the geometric design standard to help draw meaningful findings for safety impacts analysis. 4.7 Safety impacts of red light running photo enforcement The safety impacts of intersection red light running photo enforcement with Type I and Type II treatments are established using average percentage reductions in red light running related fatal injury and PDO crashes which are formulated as follows Eff F = Σ J Δ j A F Type I 1 j = 1 EB j A F Type I r j A F Type I J - Eff I Eff P Σ K Δ k A F Type II k = 1 EB k A F Type II r k A F Δ j A I Type I j = 1 EB j A I Type I r j A I Type I Σ K Δ k A I Type II k = 1 EB k A I Type II r k A I Type II Δ j A P Type I j = 1 EB j A P Type I r j A P Type I Σ K Δ k A P Type II k = 1 EB k A P Type II r k A P = Σ J = Σ J Type II 1 K 7 1 J - 1 K 1 J - 8 Type II 1 K 9 where Eff F Eff I and Eff P are safety impacts of red light running photo enforcement estimated in terms of percentage reductions in fatal injury and PDO crashes Δ j A F Type I and Δ k A F Type II Δ j A I Type I and Δ k A I Type II Δ j A P Type I and Δ k A P Type II are reductions in red light running related types of fatal injury and PDO crashes that resulted from the installation of red light running cameras at an intersection j with Type I treatment and an intersection k w ith Type II treatment EB j A F Type I and EB k A F Type II EB j A I Type I and EB k A I Type II EB j A P Type I and EB k A P Type II are the EBadjusted fatal injury and PDO crashes for the after treatment period at an intersection j with Type I treatment and an intersection k with Type II treatment r j A F Type I r j A P Type I r k A F Type II r j A I Type I and r k A I are proportions of red light Type II and r k A P Type II running related types of fatal injury and PDO crashes observed in the after treatment period at an intersection j with Type I treatment and an intersection k with Type II treatment. 5 Methodology application 5.1 Calibration of SPFs Table 1 summarizes the total number of untreated intersections and fatal injury and PDO crashes occurred for 2004-2010 used for calibrating the SPFs required for the EB-based analysis. Table 2 represents descriptive statistics of the daily traffic observed at the untreated intersection. The intersection w ith single-lane approaches has average daily traffic of approximately 34000 vehicles and a standard deviation of 8000 while the intersection with multilane approaches has average daily traffic of approximately 45000 vehicles and a standard deviation of 18000. The NLOGIT5. 0 econometric software which is an extension to the LIMDEP software was used for the safety performance function development Econometric Software Inc. 2009. The software provides estimates of coefficients and standard errors for individual explanatory variables. Results of diagnostic tests such as adjusted R 2 for goodness of fit p-values and t-statistic values for individual explanatory variables significance of overdispersion and

Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering English Edition 315 presence of multi-collinearity autocorrelation and heteroskedasticity are directly produced in the model runs to help refine and select the model that best fits the data. Tab. 1 Total number of intersections and crashes used for SPF calibrations Intersection 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Single-lane 22 22 20 16 16 15 15 Numbers Multilane 120 118 114 106 101 98 95 Total 142 140 134 122 117 113 110 Fatal 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 Injury A 44 32 32 16 29 22 21 Crash severity Injury B C 665 533 561 370 305 264 217 PDO 1547 1424 1160 940 978 1072 1096 Total 2258 1990 1753 1327 1312 1358 1334 Tab. 2 AADT statistics of intersections used for SPF calibrations Intersection type Descriptive statistics 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Mean 34107 34131 34170 34222 34289 34370 34465 Median 33331 33374 33594 33625 34057 33715 33732 Single-lane Std. Dev. 7894 8183 8517 8893 9306 9755 10236 Min 16722 16732 16387 16050 15719 14905 13996 Max 56261 55528 56000 58327 60751 63275 65905 Mean 44879 44906 45048 45004 45074 45158 45256 Median 42569 42538 42447 42267 42384 42400 42399 Multilane Std. Dev. 17264 17405 17894 17792 18036 18315 18627 Min 8891 8608 8334 8069 7812 7563 7322 Max 174106 173123 172145 171173 170206 169244 168418 For each explanatory variable found to be statistically significant the softw are helps estimate its coefficient value and standard error. The process for calibrating the SPFs involved first of all conducting a preliminary trend analysis and identifying influencing factors at the intersections responsible for crash occurrences and then obtaining the distributions of the explanatory variables. Each explanatory variable is then added one by one starting from the most significant one based on the preliminary trend analysis to test the statistical significance of its inclusion in the model of choice. The model validity is determined by testing the multi-collinearity of explanatory variables autocorrelation of error terms and heteroskedasticity of error terms. Tab. 3 tabulates the SPFs so developed for injury PDO and total crashes. The zero-inflated Poisson models w ere found to be the most appropriate for calibrating SPFs for injury PDO and total crashes owing to a large number of intersections that did not experience any crashes during the data analysis period.

316 Yongdoo Lee et al. Tab. 3 Calibrated SPF statistics for intersections Model Injury crashes Zero-inflated Poisson with normal hetro Observations 304 Adjusted R 2 0. 69 Variable Model Standard coefficient error t-statistic Dependent variable Ln Injury crashes /year Independent variables Constant 3. 440 0. 947 0. 000 Ln Daily entering traffic /lane - 0. 200 0. 109 0. 067 Countdown - 1. 401 0. 725 0. 053 No control - 0. 260 0. 107 0. 015 Two-way stop - 0. 413 0. 129 0. 001 All-way stop - 0. 450 0. 160 0. 005 Dispersion parameter α per mile per year 0. 395 0. 049 0. 000 PDO crashes Zero-inflated Poisson with normal hetro Observations 304 Adjusted R 2 0. 85 Dependent variable Ln PDO crashes /year Independent variables Constant 1. 415 0. 687 0. 039 Ln Daily entering traffic /lane 0. 123 0. 078 0. 116 Countdown - 0. 301 0. 117 0. 010 No control - 0. 640 0. 102 0. 000 Stop sign - 0. 719 0. 291 0. 014 Pedestrian signal - 0. 169 0. 088 0. 053 Dispersion parameter α per mile per year 0. 151 0. 032 0. 000 Total Crashes Zero-inflated Poisson with normal hetro Observations 304 Adjusted R 2 0. 90 Dependent variable Ln Fatal crashes /year Independent variables Constant 1. 051 0. 720 0. 144 Ln Daily entering traffic /lane 0. 135 0. 075 0. 071 Total number of lane 0. 047 0. 014 0. 001 Traffic signal 0. 322 0. 100 0. 001 Countdown - 0. 887 0. 291 0. 002 Two-way stop - 0. 286 0. 095 0. 003 All-way stop - 0. 239 0. 119 0. 044 Pedestrian signal - 0. 159 0. 073 0. 029 Dispersion parameter α per mile per year 0. 107 0. 016 0. 000 The dispersion parameters w ere found to be statistically significant for all calibrated SPFs. The values of dispersion parameters w ere found to be betw een 0. 107 and 0. 395 suggesting that the variance is greatly higher than the mean of crash frequency. The adjusted R 2 values for the calibrated models for injury PDO and total crashes ranged from 0. 69 to 0. 90 suggesting that the models have considerable predictive power. As expected the daily entering traffic volumes per lane turned out to be a statistically significant factor in all SPFs. The Wald's test for linear restrictions w as used to determine the relationship betw een daily traffic volume and the number of crashes. For all the developed models the Wald s test results indicated that the coefficient of daily entering traffic per lane significantly differed from 1. 0 thus supporting the hypothesis that a non-linear relationship exists betw een traffic volumes and numbers of crashes associated w ith intersections. In the calibrated model for total crashes the variable for number of lanes was found to be significant and having positive coefficients. This relationship meets the expectation that in-

Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering English Edition 317 creasing the number of lanes at an intersection would allow a higher volume of traffic to travel through and would thus potentially lead to more crashes all the other factors held constant. For all calibrated SPFs the signalized intersections equipped w ith countdow n signals for pedestrians and the intersections installed with two-way or all-way stop signs tend to have reduced number of injury PDO and total crashes. This can be attributed to control over the driver errors by means of equipment. 5.2 Estimation of safety impacts of red light runn-ing photo enforcement Tables 4 and 5 represent summarized information on the total number of intersections with Type I and Type II treatments and associated crashes classified by severity level for 2004-2010. It w as observed that relatively more intersections received the Type II treatment. Tab. 4 Distribution of Type I and Type II treated intersections for EB analysis Treatment Intersection AADT 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 < 40000 0 0 0 2 5 8 9 Single-lane 40000-50000 2 2 2 2 5 8 10 > 50000 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Type I < 40000 5 5 7 10 21 35 37 Multilane 40000-50000 7 7 11 20 35 43 49 > 50000 6 6 8 28 58 72 75 Subtotal 20 20 28 62 124 167 181 < 40000 77 77 80 84 86 86 86 Single-lane 40000-50000 21 21 22 22 23 24 24 > 50000 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Type II < 40000 306 306 310 315 318 319 320 Multilane 40000-50000 177 178 178 179 181 181 182 > 50000 202 203 209 210 213 213 213 Subtotal 786 788 802 813 824 826 828 Tab. 5 Total crashes associated with Type I and Type II treated intersections for EB analysis Treatment Intersection AADT No. Fatal Injury PDO Total < 40000 10 0 168 527 695 Single-lane 40000-50000 11 0 284 817 1101 > 50000 3 0 37 93 130 Type I < 40000 33 1 1089 2652 3742 Multilane 40000-50000 34 2 1501 4266 5769 > 50000 66 4 2968 8706 11678 Subtotal 157 7 6047 17061 23115 < 40000 6 0 118 335 453 Single-lane 40000-50000 1 0 28 113 141 > 50000 0 0 0 0 0 Type II < 40000 14 0 401 948 1349 Multilane 40000-50000 5 1 148 268 417 > 50000 5 0 112 318 430 Subtotal 31 1 807 1982 2790 The safety impacts of red light running photo enforcement was evaluated for all types of red light running related crashes and categorized by AADT range and by intersection approach type.

318 Yongdoo Lee et al. All the crashes in the category of crash types and severity at the signalized intersections w ith Type I and Type II treatments w ere grouped according to daily traffic range per lane by intersection approach type. Tab. 6 represents the overall reductions in red light running related crash types after deploying the photo enforcement systems. The photo enforcement w as found to be effective in reducing fatal crashes for intersections w ith single-lane approaches regardless of AADT levels. The reductions in related types of fatal crashes ranged from 32 percent to 48 percent. However intersections w here red light running photo enforcement w as installed experienced an increase between one percent and 6 percent for the PDO crashes. Therefore mixed results were obtained concerning safety impacts of red light running photo enforcement on injury crashes. The results of this study suggest that for AADT levels lower than 40000 vehicles use of red light running photo enforcement appears to reduce injury crashes by 8 percent but there is an increase in the injury crashes by 4 percent to 16 percent for AADT levels greater than 40000 vehicles. Similar to the findings above installation of red light running photo enforcement was found to be effective in reducing fatal crashes for intersections with multilane approaches regardless of AADT levels. The reductions in related fatal crashes ranged between 4 percent and 22 percent. However intersections with red light running photo enforcement installed were found to experience an increase in PDO crashes of 5 percent to 10 percent. Mixed results were obtained regarding the safety impacts of red light running photo enforcement on injury crashes. For AADT levels lower than 50000 vehicles intersections with red light running photo enforcement installed experienced an increase in injury crashes of approximately 1 percent to 2 percent. However the injury crash rate decreased by 4 percent for intersections with AADT levels greater than 50000 vehicles. For safety impacts estimated in terms of potential reductions in all red light running related crash types categorized by daily traffic range per lane red light running photo enforcement w as found to be effective in reducing fatal crashes in all situations analyzed regardless of the AADT levels. The reduction in fatal crashes ranged from 33 percent to 38 percent. However red light running photo enforcement was found to cause an increase in PDO crashes by about 3 percent to 8 percent on average. Mixed results were obtained concerning the safety impacts of red light running photo enforcement for injury crashes. When AADT ranged between 40000 and 50000 vehicles intersections w ith red light running photo enforcement installed experienced an approximately 5 percent increase in injury crashes with 3 percent increase in rear-end injury crashes. However for AADT levels less than 40000 or greater than 50000 vehicles intersections equipped w ith red light running photo enforcement experienced a reduction in injury crashes by about 2 percent to 3 percent. For all red light running related crashes the safety impacts of the red light running photo enforcement w as found to be effective for the most severe crash category namely fatal. A 22 percent reduction in fatal crashes and one percent reduction in injury crashes w ere observed at intersections w here red light running enforcement cameras were installed. However red light running photo enforcement w as found on average to increase PDO crashes by approximately 7 percent. For specific red light running related types of crashes including head-on rear-end angle turning sideswipe-same direction SW-S and sideswipe-opposite direction SW-O crashes the red-light enforcement was found to be effective in reducing fatal crashes. In addition the installation of red light running enforcement cameras reduced injury related rear-end and sidesw ipe crashes. Figures 2-8 illustrates the safety impacts of red light running photo enforcement in terms of fatal injury and PDO crash reductions for all red light running related crash types as classified by intersection approach type and AADT range. For all red light running related crash types and intersections having AADT between 40000 and 50000 vehicles red light running photo enforcement installed experienced 4 percent reduction in fatal crashes for intersections with multilane approaches and 48 percent reduction for intersections w ith single-lane approaches. Intersections having single lane approaches that had red light running photo enforcement installed an increase of

Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering English Edition 319 16 percent in injury crashes was observed for AADT between 40000 and 50000 vehicles and a decrease of 8 percent is observed for AADT less than 40000 vehicles. Tab. 6 Reductions in red light running related types of crashes caused by intersection photo enforcement based on preliminary EB analysis % Approach type AADT Crash type Head-on Rear-end Angle Turning SW-S SW-O Total Fatal 0. 4 9. 6 7. 5 5. 1 8. 6 1. 1 32. 2 < 40000 Injury 0. 3 4. 7 0. 8 0. 8 1. 6 0. 0 8. 2 PDO - 0. 2-1. 5-2. 9-0. 8-0. 2-0. 2-5. 9 Total - 0. 1-0. 1-1. 9-0. 7-0. 2-0. 1-3. 1 Fatal 1. 2 18. 9 10. 8 7. 1 8. 1 1. 6 47. 7 Single-lane 40000-50000 Injury 0. 0-8. 0-1. 0-4. 4-3. 1 0. 1-16. 3 PDO 0. 3-0. 4 1. 2-0. 6-1. 0-0. 2-0. 6 Total 0. 3-0. 3 1. 5-0. 7-0. 2 0. 0 0. 7 Fatal 0. 6 16. 2 6. 0 7. 9 7. 3 0. 0 37. 9 > 50000 Injury - 0. 2-0. 6-2. 3-0. 7 0. 0 0. 0-3. 8 PDO 0. 0-0. 9 0. 8-0. 5-1. 8 0. 0-2. 4 Total - 0. 1-2. 2-1. 1-1. 1-0. 9 0. 0-5. 4 Fatal 0. 9 10. 5 3. 4 4. 7 2. 0 0. 3 21. 7 < 40000 Injury 0. 1 0. 2 0. 2-0. 7-0. 5-0. 1-0. 9 PDO - 0. 1-2. 5-2. 5-1. 6-1. 2-0. 1-8. 0 Total 0. 0-1. 3-1. 2-0. 9-0. 7-0. 1-4. 3 Fatal - 1. 4 4. 0 0. 3-1. 2 2. 2-0. 4 3. 6 Multilane 40000-50000 Injury - 0. 2-1. 4-1. 0-0. 4 0. 8 0. 6-1. 7 PDO 0. 1-2. 6-1. 0-0. 5-0. 7-0. 2-4. 9 Total - 0. 1-2. 7-1. 2-0. 6-0. 4 0. 0-5. 1 Fatal 0. 4 10. 7 2. 4 3. 8 4. 0 0. 6 21. 9 > 50000 Injury 0. 0 2. 2 0. 3 0. 8 1. 0 0. 1 4. 3 PDO - 0. 2-4. 4-2. 1-1. 9-1. 3-0. 2-10. 1 Total - 0. 1-2. 0-1. 3-1. 0-0. 7-0. 1-5. 2 Fatal 0. 8 10. 9 5. 2 5. 2 4. 0 0. 5 26. 5 < 40000 Injury 0. 1 1. 7 0. 5-0. 2 0. 1 0. 0 2. 1 PDO - 0. 1-2. 4-2. 9-1. 5-1. 0-0. 1-8. 2 Total 0. 0-1. 0-1. 6-0. 9-0. 6-0. 1-4. 3 Fatal - 0. 6 8. 0 3. 2 1. 1 3. 8 1. 3 16. 8 All approach types 40000-50000 Injury - 0. 2-2. 8-0. 9-1. 3-0. 2 0. 5-4. 9 PDO 0. 2-2. 0-0. 2-0. 5-0. 7-0. 1-3. 4 Total 0. 0-1. 8-0. 3-0. 6-0. 2 0. 0-2. 9 Fatal 0. 4 11. 4 3. 2 4. 3 4. 4 0. 6 24. 3 > 50000 Injury 0. 0 1. 7-0. 1 0. 5 0. 9 0. 1 3. 0 PDO - 0. 1-3. 5-1. 4-1. 5-1. 3-0. 1-8. 0 Total - 0. 1-1. 8-1. 1-0. 9-0. 6-0. 1-4. 6 Total Fatal 0. 3 10. 4 3. 6 3. 8 3. 8 0. 5 22. 3 Injury 0. 0 0. 9-0. 1-0. 3 0. 3 0. 1 0. 9 PDO - 0. 1-2. 8-1. 7-1. 2-1. 1-0. 2-7. 2 Total - 0. 1-1. 5-1. 1-0. 9-0. 6-0. 1-4. 3

320 Intersections w ith red light running photo enforcement installed experienced an increase of 10 percent in PDO crashes for intersections w ith multilane approaches and AADT over 50000 vehicles and an increase of one percent for intersections w ith single-lane approaches and AADT between 40000 and 50000 vehicles. Specifically for fatal crashes the use of red light running photo enforcement resulted in increasing crashes by about 1 percent to reducing them by approximately 1 percent for head-on crashes reducing crashes by between 4 percent and 19 percent for rear-end crashes reducing crashes by between 0. 3 percent and Yongdoo Lee et al. 11 percent for angle crashes increasing crashes by slightly over 1 percent to reducing them by 8 percent for turning crashes reducing crashes by 2 percent to 9 percent for sideswipe crashes in the same direction and increasing crashes by 0. 4 percent to reducing them by 2 percent for sideswipe crashes in the opposite direction. Red light running photo enforcement was found to be ineffective for reducing PDO crashes in all cases. For all red light running related crash types combined the PDO crash increases vary by between 0. 6 percent and 10 percent. The PDO crashes varied betw een decreasing angle crashes by 1. 2 percent and increasing rear-end crashes by 4 percent. Fig. 2 All types of crashes Fig. 3 Head-on crashes

Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering English Edition 321 Fig. 4 Rear-end crashes Fig. 5 Angle crashes Fig. 6 Turning crashes

322 Yongdoo Lee et al. Fig. 7 Side swipe-same direction crashes Fig. 8 Side swipe-opposite direction crashes Mixed results were obtained for the use of red light running photo enforcement on reducing injury crashes. For all red light running related crash types combined injury crashes experienced varying results from a decrease of as much as 8 percent to an increase of approximately 16 percent. Based on the red light running related crash types injury crashes experienced varying results from a decrease of 5 percent as in the case of angle crashes to an increase of 8 percent for rear-end crashes. 6 Conclusions The positive effects of the red light running photo enforcement on intersection traffic safety have been documented as noted in the literature review implying that the total number of crashes decreased after deploying red light running photo enforcement at signalized intersections. Positive impacts w ere noted on rear-end crashes in the Council Bluffs and Davenport Iowa case study on angle crashes in the Lafayette and Oxnard California case study and in the Ontario California case study. Those studies analyzed the effects of red light running photo enforcement use by changes in crash severities. However most of the previous researches utilized relatively small datasets typically between 5 and 17 intersections except the Greensboro North Carolina work for w hich 303 intersections w ere studied. The goal of this research was to increase the significance of findings through use of a large sample size in an urban setting. Therefore data were collected for approximately 1000 signalized intersections over a pe-

Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering English Edition 323 riod of 2004 through 2010. Utilizing a large sample size allowed the researchers to analyze the data at a deeper level than just crash totals in general. In this research intersections w ere categorized in the following ways i intersections with signal modernization and red light running photo enforcement versus intersections with signal modernization only ii singlelane versus multilane through movement approaches and iii AADT of less than 40000 vehicles between 40000 and 50000 vehicles and more than 50000 vehicles. The crashes were categorized as follows i crash severity levels fatal injury or PDO ii red light running related crash types head-on rear-end angle turning sideswipe in the same direction or sidesw ipe in the opposite direction. The results of this study suggest that the use of red light running photo enforcement at signalized intersections on the whole is positive as demonstrated by fatal crash reductions varying by between 4 percent and 48 percent. However this research also found that while the use of red light running photo enforcement decreased injury crashes and slightly raised by one percent PDO crashes for angle crashes it moderately increased injury and PDO crashes for rear-end crashes. Therefore overall the use of red light running photo enforcement at intersections in a large city can be considered to have slightly positive effects on reducing related crashes. The proposed EB method appears to provide a better approach to mathematically estimate the safety impacts as compared to the conventional cross-sectional analysis method that only uses crash data for after treatment period for safety impacts analysis. The major limitation for adoption of this approach is its data intensive nature. It requires a large sample size of data pertaining to all types of intersections for developing SPFs required for the EB-adjusted crash frequency estimation. The number of years for the before and after treatment periods should be long enough to be able to adequately extract the long-term safety benefits resulting from red light running photo enforcement. Transportation agencies that maintain data on vehicle crash records highway geometrics and traffic operations as well as data processing and analysis capabilities may adopt the proposed method. The analytical steps might be simplified by developing guidelines for promoting its practical use by the agencies. Acknowledgments The authors w ould like to thank Chicago Department of Transportation for facilitating data collection and processing in methodology application. The research is partially supported by US Department of Transportation /Illinois Center for Transportation No. D7752 2008-04435-04. References AASHTO 2010. Highway safety manual 1st Edition. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Washington DC. Bochner B. Walden T. 2010. Effectiveness of red light cameras. ITE Journal 80 5 18-24. Burkey M. L. Obeng K. 2004. A detailed investigation of crash risk reduction resulting from red light cameras in small urban areas. Urban Transit Insititue the Transportation Institute North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University Greensboro. Burris M. Apparaju R. 1998. Assessment of automated photo enforcement systems for polk county signalized intersection safety improvement project. Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida Tampa. Cameron A. C. Trivedi P. K. 1998. Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge University Press Cambridge. Campbell B. Smith J. D. Najm W. G. 2004. Analysis of fatal crashes due to signal and stop sign violations. Report No. DOT HS809779 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration US Department of Transportation Washington DC. Chin H. C. Quddus M. A. 2003. Applying the random effect negative binomial model to examine traffic accident occurrence at signalized intersections. Accident Analysis and Prevention 35 2 253-259. Econometric Software Inc. 2009. NLOGIT 5. 0 software. Econometric Software Inc. Plainview. Fitzsimmons E. J. Hallmark S. L. McDonald T. J. et al. 2008. The use of statistical evaluations to investigate the effectiveness of Iowa's automated red light running programs. ITE 2008 Technical Conference and Exhibit Miami. Fleck J. L. Smith B. B. 1999. Can we make red-light runners stop Red-light photo enforcement in San Francisco California. Transportation Research Record 1693 46-49. Guo F. Wang X. S. Abdel-Aty M. A. 2010. Modeling signalized intersection safety with corridor-level spatial correlations. Accident Analysis and Prevention 42 1 84-92. Hauer E. 1997. Observational before-after studies in road safety-estimating the effect of highway and traffic engineering measures on road safety. Emerald Group Publishing Limited Bingley. Hauer E. Harwood D. W. Council F. M. et al. 2002. Esti-

324 Yongdoo Lee et al. mating safety by the empirical bayes method a tutorial. Transportation Research Record 1784 126-131. Ivan J. N. 2004. New approach for including traffic volumes in crash rate analysis and forecasting. Transportation Research Record 1897 134-141. Jovanis P. P. Chang H. 1985. Modeling the relationship of crashes to miles traveled. Transportation Research Record 1068 42-51. Kononov J. 2002. Identifying locations with potential for accident reductions use of direct diagnostics and pattern recognition methodologies. Transportation Research Record 1784 153-158. Kononov J. Allery B. 2003. Level of service of safety a conceptual blueprint and the analytical framework. Transportation Research Record 1840 57-66. Kononov J. Janson B. N. 2002. Diagnostic methodology for the detection of safety problems at intersections. Transportation Research Record 1784 51-56. Kriz K. Moran C. Regan M. 2006. An analysis of a red-light camera program in the City of Milwaukee. Public Affairs Workshop Domestic Issues PA 869. Li Z. Knight S. Cook L. J. et al. 2008. Modeling motor vehicle crashes for street racers using zero-inflated models. Accident Analysis and Prevention 40 2 835-839. Lindley D. V. Smith A. F. M. 1972. Bayes estimates for the linear model. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B Methodological 34 1 1-41. Long J. S. 1997. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Sage Publications Thousand Oaks. Lord D. Washington S. P. Ivan J. N. 2005. Poisson poissongamma and zero-inflated regression models of motor vehicle crashes balancing statistical fit and theory. Accident Analysis and Prevention 37 1 35-46. Lord D. Washington S. P. Ivan J. N. 2007. Further notes on the application of zero-inflated models in highway safety. Accident Analysis and Prevention 39 1 53-57. Lum K. M. Halim H. 2006. A before-and-after study on green signal countdown device installation. Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 9 1 29-41. Madanu S. Li Z. Z. Abbas M. 2009. Life-cycle cost analysis of highway intersection safety hardware improvements. Journal of Transportation Engineering 136 2 129-140. Malyshkina N. Mannering F. L. 2010. Zero-state markov switching count-data models an empirical assessment. Accident Analysis and Prevention 42 1 122-130. McFadden J. McGee H. W. 1999. Synthesis and evaluation of red light running automated enforcement programs in the United States. Federal Highway Administration Washington DC. NCHRP 2003. Impact of red light camera enforcement on crash experience. Synthesis 310 National Cooperative Highway Research Program Washington DC. Ng C. H. Wong Y. D. Lum K. M. 1997. The impact of redlight surveillance cameras on road safety in Singapore. Road and Transport Research 6 2 72-81. Persaud B. Lyon C. 2007. Empirical bayes before-after safety studies Lessons learned from two decades of experience and future directions. Accident Analysis and Prevention 39 3 546-555. Persaud B. Lan B. Lyon C. et al. 2010. Comparison of empirical bayes and full bayes approaches for before-after road safety evaluations. Accident Analysis and Prevention 42 1 38-43. Qin X. Ivan J. N. Ravishanker N. et al. 2005. Hierarchical bayesian estimation of safety performance functions for two-lane highways using Markov chain Monte Carlo modeling. Journal of Transportation Engineering 131 5 345-351. Retting R. A. Ferguson S. A. Hakkert A. S. 2003. Effects of red light cameras on violations and crashes a review of the international literature. Traffic Injury Prevention 4 1 17-23. Retting R. A. Kyrychenko S. Y. 2002. Reductions in injury crashes associated with red light camera enforcement in Oxnard California. American Journal of Public Health 92 11 1822-1825. Retting R. A. Ulmer R. G. Williams A. F. 1999. Prevalence and characteristics of red light running crashes in the United States. Accident Analysis and Prevention 31 6 687-694. Retting R. A. Williams A. F. Farmer C. M. et al. 1999. Evaluation of red light camera enforcement in Oxnard California. Accident Analysis and Prevention 31 3 169-174. Retting R. A. Williams A. F. Farmer C. M. et al. 1999. Evaluation of red light camera enforcement in Fairfax Va. USA. ITE Journal 69 8 30-34. Roshandeh A. M. Levinson H. S. Li Z. Z. et al. 2014. New methodology for intersection signal timing optimization to simultaneously minimize vehicle and pedestrian delays. Journal of Transportation Engineering 140 5 0414009-1-04014009-10. Smith D. M. McFadden J. Passetti K. A. 2000. Automated enforcement of red light running technology and programs a review. Transportation Research Record 1734 29-37. Schneider H. 2010. Effectiveness of red-light cameras for reducing the number of crashes at intersections in the City of Lafayette. Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development Baton Rouge. Synectics Transportation Consultants 2003. Evaluation of the red light camera enforcement pilot project. Ontario Ministry of Transportation Toronto. Vinzant J. C. Tatro B. J. 1999. Evaluation of the effects of photo radar speed and red light camera technologies on motor vehicle crash rates. Arizona State University Phoenix.