Feb. 27, 1973 R. L. CRNDORFF, JR 3,717,943 MUD RESISTANT ELASTOMERS INVENTOR. Roy L.ORNDORFF, JR. ATTY.

Similar documents
III IIII - USOO550545OA United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,505,450 Stuff (45) Date of Patent: Apr. 9, 1996

United States Patent (19) Herro

III III IIII. United States Patent (19) Dolan et al. Appl. No.: 311,676 Filed: Sep. 23, 1994

June 18, 1968 W. A. WOODS 3,388,909 BASKETBALL COURT WITH BARRIER MEANS INVENTOR, WILLIAM A. WOODS 34.4%

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2008/ A1

Blade guard for rotary lawn mowers

Feb. 6, 1968 T. D. GASS 3,367,062

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,052,424 B2

73 ASSignee: Role prly Skate Corporation, 5,570,522 11/1996 Olson et al.. ILCnile ICI, III. 5,645,288 7/1997 Lu /11.22

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2004/ A1

I

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/ A1

Jan. 12, 1965 E. F. RES 3,165,112 WALKER OR WALKER AID. Filed July 20, 196l. INVENTOR. El-Mear F Rt as. 62. (Pavel. A440/wey

Ice skate blade alignment mechanism

Sept. 21, O, EB, FETTERMAN 2,329,708 PUSH RAKE. Filed Feb. l4, l942 3 Sheets-Shee l. INNR VVVVVVVVVVV 7/// ****** e) E AS SA E E F E ES E E E S

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,641,487 B1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2015/ A1

United States Patent (19)

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,984,723 B2

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2012/ A1

United States Patent (19) Curtis

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,601,826 B1

Feb. 24, 1953 H., R. WILSON 2,629,609 WHEELED GOLF BAG

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/ A1

United States Patent (19)

United States Patent (19) Condo et al.

(12) United States Patent

7%averzazz az72eways. AZafaa 77/owa soy. /v/a/y7 Oa. July 7, 1964 W. A. THOMPSON 3,139,732 BOAT STABILIZING AND LIFTING DEVICE.

United States Patent (19) Neuhalfen

Aug. 14, A4i/2 (2//y. D. COHN 2,758,416 KNEE JOINT STRUCTURE FOR WALKING DOLLS Filed Aug. 24, A772A/Ay INVENTOR.

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2003/ A1

United States Patent (19) Olmr

Nov. 27, H. N. BARNUM 1,982,491

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/ A1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,393,587 B2

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,676,193 B1

(21) Appl. No.: 808, Filed: Dec. 16, ) Int. Cl... A63D 3/ U.S. Cl /38; 273/39; 3,039,772 6/1962 Simjian...

April 27, ,582,836 A. C. LINK. METALLIC GOLF CLUB HEAD Filed July 17, % 17evera/or. Atóerz C. Zarz/C, ly /%22.6% to

. United States Patent (19) Oonuma et al.

Device for atomizing a liquid

United States Patent (19)

III IIHIII. United States Patent (19) 5,575,725 Nov. 19, Olsavsky. 11 Patent Number: 45 Date of Patent:

United States Patent (19)

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/ A1

United States Patent (19) Hunt

58) Field of searby 36, so asso's "... includes a pair of Support Straps connected at opposed ends

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,867,058 B2

United States Patent (19) Kaneko

United States Patent (19) Salandre

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2014/ A1

[11] Patent Number: 4,962,932

United States Patent (19)

Egg...","...7. Primary Examiner-Dean Kramer

NiS. United States Patent Gillikin. 15 3,646,497 (45) Feb. 29, ing for retaining the upper snugly against the wearer's foot.

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,834,776 B1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,367,170 B1. Williams (45) Date of Patent: Apr. 9, 2002

United States Patent (19) Aakre et al.

USOO6O76829A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 6,076,829 Oblack (45) Date of Patent: Jun. 20, 2000

United States Patent (19)

Wang 45 Date of Patent: Sep. 23, 1997

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,311,857 B1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2010/ A1

United States Patent (19)

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/ A1

United States Patent (19)

I A. 1 ESI MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM full. GE HEWy 'il Y2 f

Blade guard for rotary lawn mowers

United States Patent (19) Lotta

4,886,274 Dec. 12, 1989

(12) United States Patent

Oct. 7, 1952 H. A. KUEHNEL 2,612,717 FISH LURE INVENTOR. A/2A/AY A. A1/EHWEL. BY ; oema Y

3,367,102 WIRE ROPE AND METHOD OF MA KING SAME. 5 Sheets-Sheet, l INVENTOR. a22a-ee ad a 12aaaa 4-, % Az-Zava-Vay-1s

United States Patent (19) Vidlinic

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2007/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2016/ A1

(12) United States Patent

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/ A1

Aug. 5, 1952 T. G. BENNETT 2,605,917 HOISTING AND DUMPING APPARATUS FOR OYSTER DREDGES OR THE LIKE. Sne for Cattorneys

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,052,416 B2. Chang (45) Date of Patent: May 30, 2006

(12) United States Patent

United States Patent (19) Metcalfe et al.

Semi-automatic firearms

E2IB (7/02 ( ) (52) U.S. Cl /19: 464/155 (58) Field of Classification Search / , 175/325.6

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2005/ A1

(19) 42/70 F. 56 References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 566,393 8/1896 Fyrberg... 42/ ,102 9/1909 Fyrberg

XXX. United States Patent ( 11) 3,587,888. zzafzz, EzzzzzAf

(12) United States Patent

United States Patent 19

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2005/ A1

Hannes et al. 45 Date of Patent: Mar. 3, 1992 (54) BICYCLE RACK FOR PICK-UP TRUCK OTHER PUBLICATIONS

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2014/ A1. Pocatko (43) Pub. Date: Sep. 25, 2014

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,757,647 B1

5,267,353 12/1993 Milligan. 2/9

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,364,790 B1

(12) United States Patent

AC EE 44 III. Nice. Ab-Say AAA K. United States Patent (19) Adams. Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Nydegger & Associates 57 ABSTRACT

United States Patent (19)

United States Patent (19) Easton

3.940,144 2/1976 Dickie... is strap is secured to the waist belt while the other end of the

Jan. 17, 1967 R. F. MCNTOSH 3,298,463 TRIPLE STAGE UPRIGHT FOR LIFT. TRUCK FG. I IL I l s. 5O Se : SO

Transcription:

Feb. 27, 1973 R. L. CRNDORFF, JR Filed Aug. 23. l97 2. Sheets-Sheet l INVENTOR Roy L.ORNDORFF, JR. ATTY.

Feb. 27, 1973 R. L. ORNDORFF, JR Filed Aug. 23. l97) 2 Sheets-Sheet 2-32 2M 223 %2-Z ZZ 222s INVENTOR Roy L.ORNDORFF, JR "2-4% 4. ATTY.

United States Patent Office Roy L. Orndorff, Jr., Kent, Ohio, assignor to The B. F. Goodrich Company, New York, N.Y. Filed Aug. 23, 1971, Ser. No. 173,961 Int, Cl, A43b13/06 U.S. C. 36-32 R 13 Claims ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE A sole construction such as used on overshoes, boots or shoes having a resilient planar body with a plurality of spaced fins that extend transversely across the body. The fins are evenly spaced and have lobes with relatively thin portions at the juncture to the planar body. All fins are identical and are inclined relative to a horizontal plane. The fin structure may be applied to the sides of the boot structure to reduce mud pick-up through the ability of the fins to trap air between adjacent fins. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION This invention relates to a molded, resilient Self cleaning piece of rubber and more particularly to a new and improved molded rubber sole which has a novel action of trapping air to clean itself when used in the environ ment of mud or like sticky materials. It has been known to construct shoe soles and heels of resilient deformable materials such as rubber, flexible plastics and other suitable compositions which have a plurality of transversely arranged corrugated ribs, undu lations which project downwardly from and formed integrally with an upper section that is secured to the base portion of a shoe. The ribs generally project rear wardly from the front or toe section of the shoe towards the heel and are inclined generally downwardly. Such ribs in shoe construtcion have been confined to the general use of facilitating the walking action or to ease the wearer's comfort in standing. The sole construction of the present invention which is particularly adaptable to overshoes is an improved concept over such corrugated ribs by providing a plurality of transversely extending flexible fins that are thinner in construction and even in spacing and of such length that they trap air between adjacent fins upon deflection such that they spring back into original shape and will clean themselves if such fins come in contact with mud. One form of the invention is to have a plurality of fins dis posed at approximately forty-five degree angle with respect to the horizontal plane and with the spaces be tween the fins being equal but with lobes at the forwardly most portion of the fin and with a relatively thin portion adjacent to the body portion to facilitate the trapping of air which aids in the self-cleaning action of the boot fins. In addition, fin structure may be placed around the side surfaces of the boot to inhibit mud build-up in that area adjacent to the sole of a boot. The fins are flexible such that the normal walking action of the overshoe will com press the fins easily to effect a trapping action of the air to clean the mud that is encountered on the lower most surface as well as the side surfaces. Such invention is applicable to other rubber products wherein they inhibit the build-up of mud and their use in such an environment. The present invention is especially applicable to boots and shoes. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION This invention relates to sole construction and side boot construction such as used on overshoes, boots, or shoes wherein the sole has a resilient body that is adapted to be 1. O 30 3 40 4 0 60 6 70 Patented Feb. 27, 1973 2 fixedly secured to the base of the shoe or an integral part of it as constructed. The sole has a plurality of trans versely extending fins, which fins slant downwardly from the resilient body. All the fins' cross-sectional dimension is initially very thin and becomes progressively thicker to form a lobe. The grooves between adjacent fins are equal and similar in dimension defining lobes in inverse order to the lobes of the fins. The fins cooperate with each other such that on deflection the fins trap air to facilitate the self-cleaning feature whereby the sole of overshoes clean the mud. The action of the fins on the side surfaces of the boot, which may be flat thin fins or of the described lobe structure, perform a similar self-cleaning action. This invention is applicable to other uses that remove mud from their operating surfaces as in mud from tire surfaces. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is a side elevational view of a boot provided with a sole construction embodying the principles of the present invention. FIG. 2 is an enlarged fragmentary side elevational view of a portion of a sole construction of FIG. 1, showing the construction approximately three times its normal size. FIG. 3 is a side elevational view of a boot provided with a sole and side construction embodying the principle of the present invention. FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view of the boot shown in FIG. 3 taken along line 4-4 thereof. FIG. is a fragmentary view of the forward portion of a boot showing a novel side construction. FIG. 6 is a bottom view of the sole and side construc tion illustrated in FIG.. FIG. 7 is an enlarged fragmentary side elevational view of a portion of a sole construction. DETAILED DESCRIPTION Referring to the drawings wherein like reference characters designate like or corresponding parts through out the several views, there is shown in FIG. 1 a boot or overshoe 10 having a sole 11 and heel 12 construction made in accordance with the present invention. The sole 11 and heel 12 are shown attached and part of the over shoe 10. It is to be understood that this sole and heel construction is particularly adaptable to an overshoe or boot construction which encounters mud and that this structure may be applied to shoes, tire or other surfaces to reduce or eliminate their mud pick-up. The sole 11 in cludes a solid planar portion 13 (FIG. 2) that is generally horizontally disposed having a plurality of downwardly and forwardly extending fins 14. The fins 14 extend trans versely across the sole defining grooves 1 between adjacent pairs of fins 14. Each fin 14 is of the same uni form configuration, having a lobe 16 at the outermost end portion and a relatively thin narrow bridging portion 17 byen the lobe 16 and the horizontally disposed por tion 13. The height of lobed fin 16 is designated a and in the example illustrated is one-fourth of an inch (0.2'). The thickness of the bridging portion 17 of a fin 16 is two hundreths of an inch (0.0'), which is designated as b in FIG. 2. The radius of a lobe is designated as R in FIG. 2 and is six hundredths of an inch (0.06'). As viewed in FIGS. 1 and 2 the rear surface 18 of each fin is planar and make an angle of approximately thirty degrees with a line perpendicular to the horizontally disposed planar por tion 13. All of the rear surfaces 18 of the fins 14 are parallel to each other. The length of the fins 14 and the grooves 1 are determined by the width of the sole as viewed in plan of FIG. 6. The lobes 16 of the respective fins 14 cooperate with the grooves 1 to trap air to facili tate the self-cleaning action of the sole.

3 The heel 12 of the boot is constructed of the same type of fins 14 as the sole, however, the fins 14 of the heel 12 are sloping in a generally rearward direction, i.e. or leftward as viewed in FIG. 1. The operation of the sole 11 and heel 12 construction as described in the environment of mud, as where an individual uses shoes or an overshoe with the sole con structed in accordance with the above described structure, is such that in walking the fins 14 yield as they are pressed into the mud, trapping air at the base of the fins. As the sole and heel is raised out of the mud surface the air acts to breaks up the suction that would ordinarily exist. The sides of the fins would open and allow the air to flow into the groove and facilitate the peeling off and breaking off of the mud. The precise action of the fins and phenomenon occurring is not fully understood, however, tests made of such surfaces in use have shown that because of the above described sole and heel construction, boots and overshoes reduce significantly the amount of mud picked up, com pared with boots having conventional soles. With the construction shown, the lobes provide a much greater wear depth due to the thickness of the lobes than other types of lugs. The distance between the lobe and the adjacent rear surface 18, designated c in FIG. 2, is in the order of 0.02', the air trapping action is instantaneous and effective especially in low-viscosity mud to inhibit the pick-up of mud. With such action, the grooves 1 do not plug up. The thinness of the bridging portion provides for more flexibility and acts as a hinge point to assure a quicker closing response of the lobes in their air trapping action. The fin structure in FIG. 1 is larger than actually pro portioned; however, such sole and heel construction in FIG. 1 is shown to illustrate the general overall structure in use. The proportions are shown in FIG. 2 wherein the size is magnified three times. The height of the lobed fin is designated a, thickness of the fin b, width of the groove between lobe 16 and surface 18 is c. A modified structure is shown in FIG. 3 wherein a boot has a heel 21 and a sole 22 constructed so that each has a plurality of downwardly inclined fins 2. The fins 2 extend transversely across the sole as shown in FIG. 6 defining grooves 26 between adjacent pairs of fins 2. Each fin 2 is of uniform thickness throughout its height. The fins extend downwardly and rearwardly with respect to the heel portion and downwardly and forwardly on the toe portion of the boot, with each fin having a front surface portion 27 and a rear surface portion 28. All of the front and rear surfaces 27 and 28 respectively of the fins 2 of the sole portion are parallel to each other and disposed at approximately 4 with respect to the horizontal. However, such angle may vary from 2 to over with respect to the horizontal and still function to provide a novel result as set forth above. The height of the fin designated as d in FIG. 7 is.11 of an inch whereas the height as measured along line e is 0.160 of an inch. The height of the fins and that of the grooves are identical in height and width wherein width is taken as the cross sectional dimension running perpendicular to the surfaces of 27 and 28. The length of the fin 2 and the groove 26 is determined by the width of the sole as viewed in plan view of FIG. 6. The grooves 26 cooperate with their respective adjacent fins 2 to trap air which facilitates the self-cleaning action of the sole and the heel. The entire circumferential side portions of the boot as depicted in FIG. 3 has a plurality of rows offins which are identical in construction to that depicted by FIG. 7 and disclosed by the respective heels and soles to perform a cleaning action of mud along the side surfaces of the boot. Al though three rows of fins are disclosed as 30, 31, and 32, any number may be employed and as an example six rows of such fins were employed which were found to be very effective in the elimination of mud build-up along the side surfaces of the boot, Such fins along the side surfaces O 2 30 40 60 70 7 4 operate in the same manner as described above on the sole and heel wherein the respective grooves of the fins trap air to facilitate the self-cleaning action thereof. The dimensions of the fins in FIG. 4 are larger than designated by the dimensions d and e, however, such enlargement is for clarity purposes. A modification of the invention is shown in FIG. which depicts only the forward portion of the boot dis closing the fins as running vertically along the side edges of the boot wherein such fins may be inclined forwardly as disclosed by FIG. 6, i.e. the grooves 26 are open to ward the forward portion of the toe of the boot. A vari ation on this is to have the respective fins slanted rear wardly towards the heel portion in an opposite direction to that shown in FIG. 6. The height of the fins as dis closed in FIG. is determined by the extent to which the side surfaces of the boot are covered. Although the modifications shown in FIGS. 3 through 7 disclose the thin fins, it is within the purview of the invention to pro vide the side structure of the boots to have fins disclosed in FIGS. 1 and 2 which have the lobes on the forward por tion of the fin which performs the self-cleaning action as described above. Various modifications are contemplated and may ob viously be resorted to by those skilled in the art without departing from the described invention, as hereinafter defined by the appended claims as only a preferred em bodiment thereof has been disclosed. What is claimed is: 1. In a ground contacting element which covers sub stantially the entire bottom surface of a boot, overshoe, shoe or the like, comprising a resilient body adapted to be fixedly secured to the base of an overshoe, said resilient body having a plurality of transversely extending flexible fins, said fins extending generally downwardly from said resilient body at an acute angle therefrom, each of said fins having a front and a rear face portion said rear sur face being planar, said forward surface having a curvilinear portion cooperative with said planar surface to define a lobe at the end portion and a thin narrow portion at the juncture of said fin to said base of a overshoe, each of said rear surfaces being parallel to each other, each of said fins cooperative with an adjacent fin to define a groove therebetween. 2. In a ground contacting element as set forth in claim 1 wherein each of said grooves is similar in dimension to each other groove, and the distance between the thick est portion of a lobe and the adjacent rear surface is 0.0 of an inch. 3. In a ground contacting element as set forth in claim 2 wherein said rear surfaces of said fins make an angle with a horizontal plane between 2 and 0. 4. In a ground contacting element as set forth in claim 2 wherein said height of said fins is approximately 0.2 of an inch.. In a shoe construction having a shoe upper, said upper having side portions that encompass the entire pe ripheral bottom edges thereof, said shoe having a bottom Surface portion, said upper portion being integrally formed with said bottom surface, said bottom surface having a sole portion and a heel portion, each of said sole and heel portions having a plurality of transversely extend ing flexible fins, all of said fins on said heel portion ex tending downwardly and rearwardly therefrom, all of said fins on said sole portion extending downwardly at an acute angle therefrom, all of said fins having an en larged lobe portion at the end portion and a thin bridg ing portion that facilitates the flexing of the said fins, and said fins on said respective heel and sole portion coop erative with adjacent fins to define a groove therebetween. 6. In a shoe as set forth in claim the distance be tween the thickest portion of a lobe and the closest ad jacent fin surface is 0.0 of an inch. 7. In a shoe as set forth in claim 6 wherein said sur

faces of said fins make an angle of thirty degrees with a horizontal plane. 8. In a shoe construction as set forth in claim where in said side portions have a plurality of rows of fins en compassing the entire area thereof. 9. In a shoe construction as set forth in claim 8 where in said rows extend in generally horizontal alignment. 10. In a shoe construnction as set forth in claim 8 where in said rows extend in generally vertical alignment. 11. In a ground contacting element for use in environ ments of mud and the like comprising a resilient flat body having a lower portion, said body having a plurality of spaced transversely extending flexible fins integral with said body, said fins extending downwardly and at an acute angle from said lower portion, each of said fins having a lobe in cross section with a thin bridging portion con necting said lobe to said lower portion. 12. In a ground contacting element as set forth in claim 11 wherein adjacent fins define a longitudinally extend ing groove therebetween, and each of said grooves being inverse in shape compared to said fins with the greatest dimension of said groove extending from said bridging portion to an adjacent planar surface. 10 6 13. In a ground contacting element as set forth in claim 12 distance of said lobes of said fins at its thickest por tion from the closest adjacent planar surface is between the ranges of 0.0 and 0.040 of an inch. References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,1,166 4/1939 Kraft -------------- 36-9 C 2,710,461 6/19 Hack ------------ 36-9 C X 3,114,981 12/1963 Murawski-------- 36-32 R X 3,07,09 4/1970 Vietas -------------- 36-9 C FOREIGN PATENTS 109,770 /1928 Austria ------------ 36-9 R 848,877 9/1960 Great Britain ------- 36-9 C. 1,076,729 7/1967 Great Britain ------ 36-32 R ALFRED R. GUEST, Primary Examiner 36-9 C U.S. Cl. X.R.