STAFF TRAVEL SURVEY 2006 KEY FINDINGS

Similar documents
Staff Travel Survey 2015 Key Findings

Student Travel Survey 2012 results

Satisfaction with getting to work 56% 15% 6% 6% Total distance travelled. miles per week

Satisfaction with getting to work 54% 14% 6% 5% Total distance travelled. miles per week

CONTENTS PREFACE 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE 2.0 POLICY AND GOVERNANCE 3.0 SUMMARY OF PROGRESS 4.0 NATURE OF DEMAND 5.0 TRAVEL AND PARKING INITIATIVES

Satisfaction with getting to work 55% 17% 8% 7% Total distance travelled. miles per week

15% Survey on Smart Commuting. Factsheet: University of Twente. 435 out of invited employees. This is a response rate of

Thursday 18 th January Cambridgeshire Travel Survey Presentation to the Greater Cambridge Partnership Joint Assembly

BIKEPLUS Public Bike Share Users Survey Results 2017

Final Plan 20 December 2016

Student Travel Survey 2013

Baseline Survey of New Zealanders' Attitudes and Behaviours towards Cycling in Urban Settings

DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY TRAVEL PLAN PROGRESS REPORT

Sandwell General Hospital Travel Plan 2014

The role of the Authority in promoting sustainable transport. Gerry Murphy South East Regional Assembly 27 th May 2011

CAMBRIDGE ACCESS STUDY: TACKLING CONGESTION WORKSHOP

Travel Plan Monitoring Report. Bourton View, Wellingborough - Residential

Scottish Parent Teacher Council School Travel Survey Introduction

CYCLING SCOTLAND SCOTTISH CHARITY NO.SCO29760 CYCLE FRIENDLY EMPLOYER AWARD HANDBOOK

Federal surveys. Belgian Daily Mobility (Beldam) Commuting (Home-to-Work) The 17th European conference on Mobility Management.

2013 Staff Travel Survey Results

Green Travel Strategy & Action Plan

Loughborough University Travel Planning

Travel Planning WC & NWCD Cycling Group. Thursday 2 nd July Amanda Holden

PERSONALISED TRAVEL PLANNING IN MIDLETON, COUNTY CORK

University of Leeds Travel Plan

Green Travel Strategy & Action Plan

The most innovative bike hire scheme in the UK

Integration of Sustainable Travel Modes

Walking and Cycling Action Plan Summary. A Catalyst for Change The Regional Transport Strategy for the west of Scotland

Our Cycle Promise. northernrailway.co.uk. Produced in partnership with Sustrans. July 2017

GD 0043/18 ACTIVE TRAVEL STRATEGY

1.4 The development work will also provide 30 additional car and 50 cycle parking spaces on the campus.

University of Birmingham Staff and Student Travel Survey

Appendix 9 SCUBA diving in the sea

LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY. Transport Strategy

Reflections on our learning: active travel, transport and inequalities

Contents Location Map Welcome and Introduction Travel Plan Management Science Park Accessibility Walking Cycling Bus Rail Car Sharing Contact Details

University of Leicester Travel Survey January

WELCOME. City of Greater Sudbury. Transportation Demand Management Plan

Stakeholder Consultation Survey Proposed Cycle Options on Napa Valley Avenue

Green Mobility. Emani Kumar. Coordinator, ICLEI Asia & Executive Director, ICLEI South Asia.

TRAVEL PLAN ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT

TRAVEL PLAN ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT

Charlestown Streetscape Master Plan. Results of investigations into how the community are using Charlestown Streetscapes

Part 3: Active travel and public transport planning in new housing developments

UWA Commuting Survey 2013

BUS PASSENGER SURVEY RESULTS FOR: BUS PASSENGER SURVEY STAGECOACH Stagecoach in GMPTE area

EUROPEAN MOBILITY WEEK September 2015

KLB Travel to School Survey - Summary Report

Capital Bikeshare 2011 Member Survey Executive Summary

cyclingincities opinion survey ABOUT THE STUDY WHO DID WE ASK? WHAT DID WE DO?

Stagecoach in Swindon Borough area

Determining bicycle infrastructure preferences A case study of Dublin

Scotland s consultancy for sustainable transport.

Travel to Work Survey Report

Commuting by train to work in the Avonmouth - Severnside Enterprise Area

Kingswood Primary School s Travel Plan

RE-CYCLING A CITY: EXAMINING THE GROWTH OF CYCLING IN DUBLIN

Cabrillo College Transportation Study

School Travel Survey for Principals. 1. How do most of your students get to school in the morning? (Please select only one box)

Weather and Cycling in Dublin : Perceptions and Reality

Engagement Summary: Round 1

Active Travel Strategy Dumfries and Galloway

Peterborough Council on Aging

NAIROBI NMT POLICY REGIONAL CONSULTATION ON AIR QUALITY, CLEAN VEHICLES AND SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY ROADMAP

Birmingham Connected. Edmund Salt. Transportation Policy Birmingham City Council

The Greater Cambridge Travel Survey Report

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The primary challenges identified are:

Travel to Work Survey March % 40% 54% 10% 2% 5% 19% 6% 3% Headlines - FILTON. Main modes of travel (%)

Transportation Survey Results. Christina Curras Special Assistant for Administrative Services

Travel Plan Monitoring Report. Buttercross Park, Whittlesey - Residential

Bristol City Council has produced a draft Bristol Transport Strategy document.

CITY OF HAMILTON PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Transit Division

Active Travel Survey for Bridgend and Pencoed towns. Page description:

UNDERSTANDING WALKING NETWORKS TO ENABLE SMARTER CHOICES IN TRANSPORT PLANNING IN DUNDEE. Gillian Iversen Atkins

21.07 TRANSPORT CONNECTIVITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Arriva in Medway July 2010 (Kent) Council area

BUS PASSENGER SURVEY Merseyside BUS PASSENGER SURVEY RESULTS FOR: November 2009

January Project No

5 small steps to something BIG

2016 APS Go! Surveys Summary Results for Oakridge Elementary School

A Strategy for Increasing Walking and Cycling

2016 APS Go! Surveys Summary Results for Arlington Traditional School

1.0 FOREWORD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION CURRENT TRENDS IN TRAVEL FUTURE TRENDS IN TRAVEL...

BUS BUS PASSENGER SURVEY RESULTS ARRIVA Arriva in Merseyside November 2009 PTE (Merseytravel) area

2017 Florida Commuter Transportation Summit

First in Stoke-on-Trent November 2009 City Council area

GETTING WHERE WE WANT TO BE

BUS BUS PASSENGER SURVEY Cornwall RESULTS FOR:

Paper submitted to the Scottish Transport Studies Group (STSG) April 2004

WEST HATCH HIGH SCHOOL THE BEST THAT I CAN BE. School Travel Plan

Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan for Aberdeen, Scotland. Louise Napier Senior Planner Aberdeen City Council

Arriva in GMPTE July 2010area

NORTH ADELAIDE LOCAL AREA TRAFFIC AND PARKING MANAGEMENT ENGAGEMENT OUTCOMES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF ADELAIDE

2016 APS Go! Surveys Summary Results for Trades Center

BetterPoints University of Greenwich. Simon Earp Transport & Green Travel Manager

March Maidstone Integrated Transport Strategy Boxley Parish Council Briefing Note. Context. Author: Parish Clerk 2 March 2016

Walking in New Zealand May 2013

Appendix 13 Rowing and sculling in the sea

Transcription:

Survey introduction STAFF TRAVEL SURVEY 2006 KEY FINDINGS The Staff Travel Survey 2006 was launched on 13 th January and ran for 3 weeks. Links to an online survey form were provided via the Friday Memo email system on the 3 consecutive weeks of the survey. A number of hard copies were distributed in person to secretaries in all schools and units and also Residence Managers. A prize draw for a Philips sound system, sponsored by Scottish Power, was offered as an incentive to respondents. 656 staff completed either an online or hard copy survey a 34% response rate. A Staff Travel Survey was previously conducted in April 2002 with a 19% response rate. Where a direct comparison of responses from the two surveys has been possible, the results are included in the analysis below. Key results Headlines: 70% of staff travel to work by car while 15% walk, 8% cycle, and just 6% use public transport. Over a third of staff travel more than 10 miles to work. Car use has dropped by 2% since the 2002 survey, despite 7% more staff living further than 10 miles from work. More than a quarter of all staff living within a mile of work travel by car. The most popular changes that would encourage staff to cycle to work are; improved / more cycle paths on the journey to work and improved / more covered cycle racks at their workplace. The most popular changes that would encourage staff to make regular use of public transport for travel to work are; more frequent bus services, discounted bus tickets / passes, and more direct bus routes. Car users are most likely to be encouraged to car share if help is given in finding suitable car sharing partners. How do you usually travel to work? Almost half of all staff (46%) drive to work alone. Another 23% car share, giving a total of 70% staff using a car to travel to work. Comparing the 2006 survey data with that of 2002, although the modal split is similar, it is encouraging to note that numbers of car users have declined by 2%, while bus users and walkers have both increased by 1%. 2006 Survey 2002 Survey Car (alone) 46% } 70% 55% }72% Car (with others) 23% 17% Bus 6% 5% Bicycle 8% 8% Walk 15% 14% 1%. 1% 1

How staff travel to work, 2006 Bicycle 8% Bus 6% Mcycle/ scooter/ moped 1% Train 0.3% Walk 15% Car (alone) 47% Car (with others) 23% How far do you travel to work? Approximately a third of all staff live within 2 miles of work, a third live between 2 and 10 miles and the remaining third live more than 10 miles away. 14% of staff travel less than a mile to work. More staff live further from work than they did in 2002 35% of staff live more than 10 miles away compared to 28% in 2002. 2006 Survey 2002 Survey Up to 1 mile 14% } 32% 31% 1-2 miles 18% 2-4 miles 6% } 32% 41% 4-10 miles 26% 10-20 miles 26% 20-40 miles 7% } 35% 28% Over 40 miles 2% How far staff travel to work, 2006 2

30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Up to 1 mile 1-2 miles 2-4 miles 4-10 miles 10-20 miles 20-40 miles Over 40 miles How long does the journey take? 79% of staff travel for a maximum of 30 minutes to get to work. However, 6% take longer than an hour. 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 0-15 mins 16-30 mins 31-45 mins 46-60 mins 61-90 mins >90 mins Journey distance by mode of travel More than a quarter of all staff living within a mile of work (27%), travel by car. Staff cycling to work are most likely to be travelling 1-2 miles although a few travel more than 10 miles by bicycle. Not too surprisingly, most staff on foot travel less than a mile although 7% walk more than 2 miles. Bus users are most likely to be travelling 20 40 miles. Car Walk Cycle Bus Up to 1 mile 27% 62% 9% 2% 0% 1-2 miles 49% 32% 18% 1% 1% 2-4 miles 74% 9% 12% 5% 0% 4-10 miles 79% 0% 10% 9% 1% 10-20 miles 90% 0% 1% 8% 1% 20-40 miles 89% 0% 0% 11% 0% Over 40 miles 86% 0% 0% 0% 14% 3

Public Transport 37% staff who usually travel to work by car or motorcycle/scooter/moped would not be encouraged by any changes to regularly use public transport. Respondents were able to add comments as to why. The main reasons given, grouped into categories of response, were (in order of frequency): 1. Home not on suitable bus/train route 2. Carer / school run responsibilities 3. Bus timetable not suitable / shift working 4. Need flexibility of car activities/pets 5. Public transport takes too long 6. Security /convenience of car 7. Enjoy driving The most popular changes that would encourage staff to make regular use of public transport were: more frequent bus services, discounted bus tickets / passes, and more direct bus routes (see chart below). Changes that would encourage regular use of public transport, 2006 More frequent bus services Discounted bus tickets / passes More direct bus routes More reliable bus services More convenient bus drop-off points for work Cleaner and more comfortable buses More bus timetable and route information Better connections between workplace and train station Discounted train tickets/passes More frequent train services Improved bus security eg lighting at stops More reliable train services More train timetable and route information Cleaner and more comfortable trains Improved train security eg lighting at station 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 No.respondents Bus pricing 31% of respondents said that they would not consider using the bus, regardless of ticket price. Those that would consider the bus, would pay a maximum return fare from home to work of 1.50 for the shortest journeys of less than 2 miles each way, and up to 10 for journeys of 40 miles or more each way. Comparison with current Stagecoach fares. Staff distance to work Max willing to pay Stagecoach pricing for return bus fare Up to 2 miles 1.50 2 4 miles 2.00 4 10 miles 2.00 3.50 10 20 miles 3.00 5.00 20 40 miles 5.00 40+ miles 8-10 4

For those currently travelling by bus, the majority (81%) have less than 10 minutes walk to get from the bus stop to their workplace. 40% have less than 5 minutes walk but 2% have more than 21 minutes walk. Car travel The main reasons selected by car users for using a car to get to work (in order of frequency) were: 1. Quickest means of getting to work 2. Convenience, comfort 3. Flexibility (eg to fulfil carer responsibilities) Main reasons for using a car to get to work, 2006 Quickest means of travel Convenience/comfort Flexibility Lack of suitable alternative Avail of parking close to workplace School run Car essential to perform job 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 No. respondents Car use during the working day Most staff bringing at car to work use it during the working day some days for getting to other places of work (within or outwith the University), for lunchtime activities, for carer responsibilities and for other reasons. reasons tended to be for shopping or going direct to after-work activities. Most days Some days Rarely/never No. respondents Getting to other places of work 10% 57% 33% 418 Lunchtime activities 8% 65% 27% 366 Carer responsibilities 12% 67% 21% 341 18% 82% - 33 Parking Most staff (58%) park in a University car park attached to their place of work. Even if they are parking outwith a workplace car park, the vast majority (91%) are walking no more than 5 minutes from their car to their workplace. Almost a quarter of car users (24%) who are not using a car park at their workplace, are parking on the Scores. A further 13% are finding parking at other University car parks on the Scores. 8% find places in the University car park behind 107 North Street. 5

100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% In Uni car park at workplace Free street /nonuni car park In Uni car park at another building Paid street / car park Reducing car use 38% of car users would not currently be discouraged from travelling to work by car by any measures. For those that might be encouraged to reduce car use, the key measure selected was improvements to public transport. Measures which might help reduce car use for travel to and from work, 2006 Improvements to public transport Financial incentives Encouragement to work from home Improved facilities for cyclists Improved car sharing scheme 0 50 100 150 200 250 No. respondents Car sharing 28% of car users would not be encouraged to car share by any changes. Respondents were able to add comments as to why. The main reasons given, grouped into categories of response, were (in order of frequency): 1. Irregular work pattern 2. Lack of flexibility 3. Carer responsibilities For the remainder of car users, the change most likely to encourage car sharing is to offer help in finding suitable car sharing partners. 6

Changes which would most encourage car users to car share to work, 2006 Help finding carshare partners Free designated parking Free taxi home if needed 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 No. respondents Cycling For 66% of car users, no changes would encourage them to cycle to work. Equally, 54% of public transport users would not be encouraged to cycle. By far the main reason given for this reluctance was a prohibitive distance from home to work (139 responses). Also that the journey would take too long (12 responses). reasons quoted by 10 or more responses were: the need to transport children to school, safety concerns, medical / health reasons, poor weather / dark mornings and evenings. The most popular changes that would encourage staff to cycle to work were: improved / more cycle paths on the journey to work, followed by improved / more covered cycle racks at their workplace (see chart below). Changes that would encourage regular cycling to work, 2006 Improved / more cycle paths Improved /more covered cycle racks Improved changing facilities /showers/ lockers Opportunity to buy discounted bicycle 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 No. respondents Analysis to follow: Analysis of further comments given by respondents (over 200). Postcode analysis of staff home /work addresses against existing bus routes. Analysis of daily working hours against bus timetables. Gender analysis? 7

Survey Follow-up Next Steps Data Analysis Analyse data based on staff home postcode and link this into existing travel routes and services to assess gaps and improvement opportunities. Feed this information into the University Transport Forum. (Ditto for student data once complete). Carry out a gender analysis of data to see how this effects travel patterns Transport Forum Update Forum with staff and student survey information. Via the Transport Forum, explore the potential for improvements in the frequency of bus services, discounted bus tickets / passes, and more direct bus routes. Car Use and Carshare Communicate the benefits of walking and cycling to staff, to influence the number of staff who live within walking and cycling distance of the University but who drive to work. Develop a proposal for improved car parking management including policing and signage Review carshare process to take account of staff feedback that uptake would be encouraged if carshare partners were found for them. Cycling Deliver and maintain programme for phased installation of cycle shelters and associated facilities. Ensure that cycle paths and infrastructure is built into future development plans where appropriate. 8