COURT OF ARBITRATION FOR SPORT (CAS) Anti-doping Division XXIII Olympic Winter Games in Pyeongchang

Similar documents
Arbitration CAS anti-doping Division (OG Rio) AD 16/010 International Olympic Committee (IOC) v. Gabriel Sincraian, award of 8 December 2016

Arbitration CAS anti-doping Division (OG Rio) AD 16/004 International Olympic Committee (IOC) v. Silvia Danekova, award of 12 August 2016

Arbitration CAS anti-doping Division (OG Rio) AD 16/006 International Olympic Committee (IOC) v. Kleber Da Silva Ramos, award of 20 August 2016

INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE IOC DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION DECISION

INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE IOC DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION DECISION REGARDING IRYNA KULESHA BORN ON 26 JUNE 1986, BELARUS, ATHLETE, WEIGHTLIFTING

INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE IOC DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION DECISION

INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE IOC DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION DECISION

INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE IOC DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION DECISION REGARDING IRYNA KULESHA BORN ON 26 JUNE 1986, BELARUS, ATHLETE, WEIGHTLIFTING

INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE IOC DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION DECISION REGARDING ALMAS UTESHOV BORN ON 18 MAY 1988, KAZAKHSTAN, ATHLETE, WEIGHTLIFTING

INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE IOC DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION DECISION

INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE IOC DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION DECISION REGARDING VITA PALAMAR BORN ON 12 OCTOBER 1977, UKRAINE, ATHLETE, ATHLETICS

UWW ANTI-DOPING PANEL DECISION. Case

COURT OF ARBITRATION FOR SPORT (CAS) Ad hoc Division Games of the XXXI Olympiad in Rio de Janeiro AWARD. Ihab Abdelrahman...

Issued Decision UK Anti-Doping and Nigel Levine

Arbitration CAS ad hoc Division (OG Rio) 16/023 Ihab Abdelrahman v. Egyptian NADO, award of 16 August 2016 (operative part of 11 August 2016)

UWW ANTI-DOPING PANEL DECISION. Case

INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE IOC DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION DECISION

INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE IOC DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION DECISION

Arbitration CAS 2017/A/4974 Lei Cao v. International Olympic Committee (IOC), award of 31 July 2017

Arbitration CAS 2017/A/4973 Chunhong Liu v. International Olympic Committee (IOC), award of 31 July 2017

INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE IOC DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION DECISION REGARDING YARELYS BARRIOS BORN ON 12 JULY 1983, CUBA, ATHLETE, ATHLETICS

INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE IOC DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION DECISION REGARDING ADAM SEROCZYNSKI BORN ON 13 MARCH 1974, ATHLETE, POLAND, CANOE

Arbitration CAS 2016/O/4454 International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v. Vera Sokolova, award of 13 October 2016

Arbitration CAS 2016/O/4455 International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v. Elmira Alembekova, award of 13 October 2016

Anti-Doping Rules applicable to the Olympic Winter Games PyeongChang 2018 (as of August 2017) 1

DECISION OF THE WORLD CURLING FEDERATION CASE PANEL. Dated 14 June, In respect of the following

Decision. the FIBA Secretary General in accordance with Article of the FIBA Internal Regulations governing Anti-Doping in the matter

Arbitration CAS 2016/O/4465 International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v. Mikhail Ryzhov, award of 13 October 2016

Arbitration CAS 2012/A/2986 World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) v. Riley Salmon & Fédération Internationale de Volleyball (FIVB), award of 30 May 2013

ANTI-DOPING AWARD DELIVERED BY THE ANTI-DOPING HEARING PANEL OF FISA. Members: Jean-Christophe Rolland Tricia Smith. In the case

United States Olympic Committee National Anti-Doping Policies

IN THE MATTER OF PROCEEDINGS BROUGHT UNDER THE ANTI-DOPING RULES OF THE RUGBY FOOTBALL LEAGUE DECISION

SOUTH AFRICAN RUGBY UNION - ANTI-DOPING REGULATIONS

Arbitration CAS 2015/A/4210 Karam Gaber v. United World Wrestling (FILA), award of 28 December 2015

Arbitration CAS ad hoc Division (O.G. Sydney) 00/015 Mihaela Melinte / International Amateur Athletic Federation (IAAF), award of 29 September 2000

Arbitration CAS 2009/A/2011 Stephan Schumacher v. International Olympic Committee (IOC), award on costs of 6 May 2010

ANTI-DOPING AWARD DELIVERED BY THE ANTI-DOPING HEARING PANEL OF FISA. Members: Jean-Christophe Rolland Tricia Smith. In the case

SA INSTITUTE FOR DRUG FREE SPORT (SAIDS) ANTI DOPING DISCIPLINARY HEARING

Decision. the FIBA Disciplinary Panel established in accordance with Article 8.1 of the FIBA Internal Regulations governing Anti-Doping in the matter

PARTIAL DECISION of the FEI TRIBUNAL. dated 2 February Event/ID: SEA Games-S Kuang Rawang (MAS)/2017_G-SE.AS_0002_S_S_01

The International Olympic Committee Anti-Doping Rules applicable to the XX Olympic Winter Games in Turin, 2006

The International Olympic Committee Anti-Doping Rules applicable to the XXI Olympic Winter Games in Vancouver, 2010

COURT OF ARBITRATION FOR SPORT (CAS) Anti-Doping Division Games of the XXXI Olympiad in Rio de Janeiro AWARD

The International Olympic Committee Anti-Doping Rules applicable to the Games of the XXXI Olympiad, in Rio de Janeiro, in 2016

FILA ANTI-DOPING REGULATIONS

Arbitration CAS 2009/A/1870 World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) v. Jessica Hardy & United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA), award of 21 May 2010

INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE IOC DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION DECISION REGARDING NESTA CARTER BORN ON 11 OCTOBER 1985, JAMAICA, ATHLETE, ATHLETICS

ANTI-DOPING ESSENTIALS

AWARD DELIVERED BY THE FISA DOPING HEARING PANEL Sitting in the following composition

INTERNATIONAL PARALYMPIC COMMITTEE (the Applicant) Versus. Mr. Yoldani SILVA PIMENTEL (the Respondent)

DECISION of the FEI TRIBUNAL. dated 22 April 2015

ABRIDGED DECISION. Made by the FEI Tribunal on 28 March 2014

INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE IOC DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION DECISION

Decision. the FIBA Disciplinary Panel established in accordance with Article 8.1 of the FIBA Internal Regulations governing Anti-Doping in the matter

Panel: Mr Massimo Coccia (Italy); President; Mr Olli Rauste (Finland); Mr Peter Leaver (United Kingdom)

FINA RULES ON THE PREVENTION OF THE MANIPULATION OF COMPETITIONS

BCAC ANTI DOPING POLICY

Re: Objective Evaluation of prospective Olympic Athletes of Russia

Panel: The Hon. Annabelle Bennett (Australia), Sole Arbitrator

Panel: Mr. Kaj Hobér (Sweden), President; Prof. Richard McLaren (Canada); Mr. Michele Bernasconi (Switzerland)

Decision. of the. ISU Disciplinary Commission. In the matter of

BASKETBALL AUSTRALIA ANTI-DOPING POLICY

Panel: The Hon. Annabelle Bennett (Australia), President; Justice Catherine Anne Davani (Papua New Guinea); Mrs Rabab Yasseen (Iraq)

ANTI-DOPING BY-LAW OF THE AUSTRALIAN OLYMPIC COMMITTEE

the FIBA Disciplinary Panel established in accordance with Article 8.1 of the FIBA Internal Regulations governing Anti-Doping in the matter

Decision. the FIBA Disciplinary Panel established in accordance with Article 8.1 of the FIBA Internal Regulations governing Anti-Doping in the matter

IN THE SOUTH AFRICAN INSTITUTE FOR DRUG-FREE SPORT ANTI-DOPING DISCIPLINARY COMMITTE HELD AT HOLIDAY INN ROSEBANK RULING

UK ANTI-DOPING LIMITED Anti-Doping Organisation. And IN THE MATTER OF PROCEEDINGS BROUGHT UNDER THE ANTI-DOPING RULES OF THE WELSH RUGBY UNION

DECISION. of the. ISU Disciplinary Commission. In the matter of

INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE IOC DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION DECISION

Panel: Mr Romano Subiotto QC (United Kingdom), President; Mr François-Charles Bernard (France); Mr Beat Hodler (Switzerland)

Arbitration CAS 2011/A/2628 Foolad Mobarakeh Sepahan FC v. Asian Football Confederation (AFC), award of 14 March 2012

Panel: Mr. Peter Leaver QC (United Kingdom), President; Mr. Malcolm Homes QC (Australia); Mr. Kaj Hobér (Sweden)

SR/Adhocsport/1025/2017

1.1 The Applicant in the case CAS OG 16/009 is the Russian Weightlifting Federation (hereinafter, the RWF ).

USCA ATHLETE/COACH CODE OF CONDUCT AGREEMENT

Tribunal Arbitral du Sport Court of Arbitration for Sport

In re: ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ANTI-DOPING RULE IN TERMS OF ARTICLE 2.1 OF THE 2016 ANTI-DOPING TRIBUNAL FINDINGS AND SANCTION

IOC Regulations on Female Hyperandrogenism

MEDICAL & ANTI-DOPING REGULATIONS

See Summary below for explanation of exception to calendar requirement. Michael Vukcevich, Deputy Director. New Jersey Racing Commission

ICC REGULATIONS ON SANCTIONING OF EVENTS

JUDICIAL AWARD DELIVERED BY THE FISA DOPING HEARING PANEL. sitting in the following composition. In the case of Kissya Cataldo Da Costa (BRA)

2018 AUSTRALIAN OLYMPIC WINTER TEAM. Ski & Snowboard Australia NOMINATION CRITERIA CROSS COUNTRY SKIING

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ATHLETICS FEDERATIONS

INTERNATIONAL PARALYMPIC COMMITTEE (the Applicant) Versus. Mr. Piotr TRUSZKOWSKI (the Respondent)

FIVB Disciplinary Panel Decision. In the matter of Mr. Saber Hoshmand (Iran)

6. Officials should maintain a high level of personal hygiene and should maintain a professional appearance at all times.

HORSE SPORT IRELAND GENERAL RULES. Horse Sport Ireland 1st Floor Beech House Millennium Park Osberstown, Naas Co. Kildare

Arbitration CAS 2009/A/1755 Adam Seroczynski v. International Olympic Committee (IOC), award of 20 August 2009

World Boxing Council Consejo Mundial de Boxeo

DECISION of the FEI TRIBUNAL. dated 18 October 2017

Selection Process for Great Britain Olympic Curling Team (Men s and Women s) 2018 Winter Olympic Games Pyeongchang, South Korea

Arbitration CAS anti-doping Division (OG Rio) AD 16/011 International Olympic Committee (IOC) v. Misha Aloian, award of 8 December 2016

Arbitration CAS ad hoc Division (O.G. Nagano) 98/002 R. / International Olympic Committee (IOC), award of 12 February 1998

SARU ANTI DOPING REGULATIONS

1.3 The purpose of this policy is to select the best eligible athletes for the Olympic Winter Games.

HOCKEY INDIA ANTI DOPING POLICY AND REGULATIONS

Arbitration CAS 2015/A/4160 World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) v. International Weightlifting Federation (IWF) & Davit Gogia, award of 17 March 2016

2016 AUSTRALIAN OLYMPIC TEAM WRESTLING AUSTRALIA INCORPORATED NOMINATION CRITERIA

Transcription:

COURT OF ARBITRATION FOR SPORT (CAS) Anti-doping Division XXIII Olympic Winter Games in Pyeongchang CAS ADD 18/03 International Olympic Committee v. Aleksandr Krushelnitckii PARTIAL AWARD ON ANTI-DOPING RULE VIOLATION in the arbitration between International Olympic Committee... (the "Applicant") World Curling Federation... (the "Co-Applicant") and Aleksandr Krushelnitckii... (the "Athlete")

I. FACTS 1. Aleksandr Krushelnitkii (the Athlete ) is an Olympic Athlete from Russia. He competed in the mixed doubles curling competition which ended on 13 February 2018. His team won a bronze medal. He is not due to compete in any further events at the Olympic Winter Games PyeongChang 2018. 2. On 12 February 2018, the Athlete underwent an in-competition doping control (the First Doping Control ) and provided urine sample number 6330170. 3. The result of the analysis of the Athlete s A sample of the First Doping Control revealed the presence of Meldonium at an estimated concentration of 8069ng/mL. 4. On 13 February 2018 the Athlete underwent a second in-competition doping control (the Second Doping Control ) and provided urine sample number 6330166. 5. The result of the analysis of the Athlete s analysis of the Second Doping Control revealed the presence of Meldonium at an estimated concentration of 5721 ng/ml. 6. Meldonium is a Metabolic Modulator, prohibited under S4.5.5.3 of the WADA Prohibited List. It is a non-specified substance. 7. The Athlete was notified of the Adverse Analytical Findings by letter from the IOC of 18 February 2018. 8. On 18 February 2018, the Athlete did not accept the Adverse Analytical Findings and requested that the B samples be opened in the presence of the Athlete and his representative. 9. The B samples were opened on 19 February 2018 at the Doping Control Centre, Seoul. The analysis of each sample confirmed the presence of Meldonium. 10. On 19 February 2018 at 10h33 KST, the IOC filed an application at the Anti- Doping Division of the Court of Arbitration for Sport ( CAS ADD ) (the Application ). In the Application, the IOC sought the following requests for relief: 1. The Application of the International Olympic Committee is admissible. 2. The Athlete be found to have committed an anti-doping rule violation in accordance with Article 2.1 and/or 2.2 of the IOC Anti-Doping Rules. 3. The results obtained by the Athlete in the Mixed Doubles Curling event at the Olympic Winter Games PyeongChang 2018 are disqualified with all resulting consequences including forfeiture of the medal, diploma, medallist pin, points and prizes. 4. The results obtained by the team of the Olympic Athletes from Russia in the Mixed Doubles Curling event at the Olympic Winter Games PyeongChang 2018 are disqualified with all resulting consequences including forfeiture of the medal, diploma, medallist pin, points and prizes. 2

5. The Chef de Mission of the Olympic Athletes from Russia delegation shall ensure full implementation of the award. 11. Included with the Application were 10 Exhibits, including the results of the A Sample Documentation Package. 12. The IOC did not ask for the Athlete to be provisionally suspended. 13. On 19 February 2018 at 13h05 KST, the CAS ADD confirmed the appointment of His Honour Judge Mark Williams SC as Sole Arbitrator in this matter. The Sole Arbitrator issued Procedural Directions to the parties and potentially interested parties. 14. On 19 February 2018 12h32 KST, the World Curling Federation (the WCF ) confirmed that it wished to join the procedure as a Co-Applicant. In such letter, World Curling requested that the Sole Arbitrator provisionally suspend the Athlete beyond the period the Games such that the Athlete would not be able to compete pending a final decision on any applicable sanction, if so determined. 15. On 21 February 2018 at 11h37 KST, the B Sample Documentation Packages were sent to the parties. 16. On 21 February 2018 at 12h15 KST, the Athlete requested a hearing in the matter. 17. On 21 February 2018 at 15h05 KST, the Sole Arbitrator determined that a hearing was necessary and the parties were notified accordingly that the hearing would take place on 22 February 2018 at 14h00 KST. 18. On 22 February 2018 in an email sent at 01h17 KST, the Athlete advised that he accepted the Adverse Analytical Findings concerning both samples, that he no longer requested a hearing, and reserved his right to seek elimination or reduction of the standard eligibility period based on No Fault or Negligence principle during disciplinary proceedings within the World Curling Federation. 19. On 22 February 2018 at 09h20 KST, the CAS ADD acknowledged the Athlete s admission and invited the IOC to comment, based on the Athlete s admission, as to the status of its Application. At the same time, the CAS ADD invited the Athlete to respond to World Curling s request for a provisional suspension of the Athlete following the conclusion of the Games. 20. On 22 February 2018 at 10h19 KST, the IOC informed the CAS ADD that despite the Athlete s admission of the violation, its remaining requests for relief in its application were maintained. 21. On 22 February 2108 at 11h36 KST, the CAS ADD noted the IOC s position and requested the Athlete to respond to the WCF s submission on the provisional suspension. The CAS ADD noted that until such time as the Sole Arbitrator heard from the Athlete on the WCF s request for a provisional suspension, the hearing would be maintained. 3

22. On 22 February 2018 at 12h19 KST, the Athlete re-confirmed his admission of the violation, accepted a provisional suspension beyond the period of the Games, and reserved all rights accordingly to seek the elimination or reduction of any period of ineligibility based on No Fault or Negligence following the conclusion of the Games. 23. On 22 February 2018 at 12h36 KST, the CAS ADD accepted the parties respective positions and cancelled the hearing. II. JURISDICTION 24. Pursuant to Rule 59.2.4 of the Olympic Charter, the IOC Executive Board has delegated to the CAS ADD its power to decide upon any violation of the World Anti-Doping Code arising upon the occasion of the Olympic Games. 25. Pursuant to Art. 8.1.1 of the IOC ADR: Where the IOC decides to assert an anti-doping rule violation, the IOC shall promptly file an application with the CAS Anti-Doping Division as per the CAS Anti-Doping Rules. 26. Article 1 of the CAS ADD Rules states that: [t]he CAS ADD shall be the firstinstance authority to conduct proceedings and to issue decisions when an alleged anti-doping rule violation has been asserted and referred to it under the IOC ADR, and for imposition of any sanctions therefrom whether applied at the Games or thereafter. Accordingly, the CAS ADD has jurisdiction to rule as a first-instance authority in place of the IOC and/or the International Federation concerned. 27. The parties do not contest the jurisdiction of the CAS ADD to decide the dispute. 28. It follows that the CAS ADD has jurisdiction over the Application. III. MERITS 29. The Athlete expressly accepts the adverse analytical findings against him and therefore the Sole Arbitrator confirms the Athlete committed an anti-doping rule violation in accordance with Article 2.1 of the IOC ADR. 30. As a consequence, the results obtained by the Athlete in the Mixed Doubles Curling event at the Olympic Winter Games PyeongChang 2018 are disqualified with all resulting consequences including forfeiture of the medal, diploma, medallist pin, points and prizes. 31. Further, the results obtained by the team of the Olympic Athletes from Russia in the Mixed Doubles Curling event at the Olympic Winter Games PyeongChang 2018 are disqualified with all resulting consequences including forfeiture of the medal, diploma, medallist pin, points and prizes. 32. It is understood that the Athlete has left the Olympic Village and returned his medal to his National Olympic Committee. The Chef de Mission of the Olympic Athletes from Russia delegation shall ensure full implementation of the award. 4

33. The Sole Arbitrator notes that the Athlete expressly reserves his right to seek the elimination or reduction of the ineligibility period on the basis of "No Fault or Negligence" in further disciplinary proceedings outside the period of the Olympic Games. Such reservation is the right of the Athlete and more information will follow concerning the next steps in this procedure in due course following the Games. 34. The anti-doping rule violation now having been determined, the IOC is no longer a party to this procedure. IV. CO-APPLICANT WCF 35. Further to the WCF s request to participate as a Co-Applicant in this procedure, the Sole Arbitrator notes the WCF delegation of power to the CAS ADD in accordance with Articles 7.1.2 and 10.2.2 of the IOC ADR (as confirmed by the WCF in its email communication to the CAS dated 20 November 2017). In this regard, the WCF s request is granted. 36. These proceedings shall continue by and between the WCF, who joined these proceedings as Co-Applicant, and the Athlete, in regard to the consequences of the ADRV which may be imposed on the Athlete. The Sole Arbitrator, after consultation with the parties, shall determine the procedural directions applicable to the remaining part of the arbitration and shall issue, at the conclusion of these proceedings following the Olympic Games, a final award, all in accordance with Article 20 of the CAS ADD Rules. 37. In the interim, and considering the WCF s request that the Athlete be provisionally suspended following the conclusion of the Games, and noting the Athlete s agreement in this regard, the Athlete is hereby provisionally suspended until such time a final decision is rendered on his violations, or otherwise informed. V. DECISION 38. On the basis of the submissions of the parties as set forth above, the application of the IOC is granted and therefore: a. The Athlete is found to have committed an anti-doping rule violation in accordance with Article 2.1 of the IOC ADR. b. The individual results obtained by the Athlete in the Mixed Doubles Curling event at the Olympic Winter Games PyeongChang 2018 are disqualified with all resulting consequences including forfeiture of the medal, diploma, medallist pin, points and prizes. c. The results obtained by the team of the Olympic Athletes from Russia in the Mixed Doubles Curling event at the Olympic Winter Games PyeongChang 2018 are disqualified with all resulting consequences including forfeiture of the medal, diploma, medallist pin, points and prizes. d. The Athlete is excluded from the Olympic Winter Games PyeongChang 2018. e. To the extent not yet done so, the Athlete shall leave the Village and return his accreditation (number 3043371-01) immediately. 5

39. With the issuance of this Order, the IOC s participation in this proceeding is hereby terminated. 40. Furthermore, the application of the WCF is granted and therefore: a. The Athlete is provisionally suspended from all Competition following the conclusion of the Olympic Winter Games PyeongChang 2018 pending a final decision on his violation. Yongpyong, 22 February 2018 at 15h10 KST The Anti-Doping Division of the Court of Arbitration for Sport His Honour Judge Mark Williams SC Sole Arbitrator 6