Performance Measures Target Setting NCTCOG Public Meetings

Similar documents
MOBILITY RESULTS AREA. Budgeting For Outcomes Council Presentation January 12, 2007

Mobility Greater Johnson County Transportation Coalition. May 23, 2018

Des Moines Area MPO Safety Performance Targets and Methodology

APPENDIX C. Systems Performance Report C-1

PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT SOME OF THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION IS OUTDATED SO IT IS ABLE TO SHOW CHANGES IN THE PLAN OVER TIME.

PRELIMINARY DRAFT FIRST AMENDMENT TO VISION 2050: A REGIONAL LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN

Appendix T 1: Additional Supporting Data

7/28/2017. Safety Performance Management: Target Setting and Coordination. Agenda. Safety Performance Management (SPM)

CONGESTED LOS ANGELES

Attachment A: Columbus Area Metropolitan Transportation Plan Objectives, Performance Measures, and Targets

SAFETY PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND TARGET SETTING. Transportation Subcommittee September 15, 2017

North Central Texas Council of Governments

FUTURE MOBILITY IN TEXAS: The Cost of Meeting the State s Need for Safe and Efficient Mobility

# Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Freeway System Reconstruction Study and Preliminary Recommended Plan

Attachment One. Integration of Performance Measures Into the Bryan/College Station MPO FY 2019 FY 2022 Transportation Improvement Program

Mobility and Congestion

Best Southwest Transportation Committee. North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department

RESOLUTION APPROVING REGIONAL TARGETS FOR PAVEMENT AND BRIDGE CONDITION AND SYSTEM PERFORMANCE MEASURES (R18-04)

COMMUNITY SCHOOLS AND TRANSPORTATION

MCTC 2018 RTP SCS and Madera County RIFP Multi-Modal Project Eval Criteria GV13.xlsx

6/14/2013. Welcome. to the US 75 Corridor Study. Public Meeting. US 75 Corridor Study Area

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS of The Draft 2015 CLRP

DEVELOPING A POLICY TO PLAN AND OPERATE MANAGED LANES IN NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS: LBJ IN DALLAS COUNTY AND AIRPORT FREEWAY IN TARRANT COUNTY

Traffic Congestion in Houston. Presented by Bill King

National Performance Management Measures. April 20, 2016 Webinar

Proposed Project I 35 from Denton to Cooke County Line

Memorandum. Purpose: To update the MPO CTAC on the status of the LRTP scenario evaluation process.

Appendix F: Detailed Modeling Results

Corridor Advisory Group and Task Force Meeting #10. July 27, 2011

Developing a Regional Complete Streets Policy Statement for North Central Texas. Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee August 17, 2011

DRAFT BUENA VISTA 2020 TRANSPORTATION PLAN

RESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Maryland State Highway Mobility Report. Morteza Tadayon

I-635 LBJ EAST PROJECT

Kentucky s Surface Transportation System

100 Most Congested Roadways in Texas

Attachment C: Benefit-Cost Analysis Spreadsheet

Base Information. 1. Project Title Erie Parkway and WCR 7 Traffic Signal Project

Kansas City Metro Transportation Snapshot Data for the transportation planning boundary

Texas Strategic Highway Safety Plan Update. 2 nd Emphasis Area Team Meeting Older Road Users 3/7/2017 Austin, TX

We believe the following comments and suggestions can help the department meet those goals.

Using GPS Data for Arterial Mobility Performance Measures

City of Jacksonville Mobility Fee Update

I-20 ODESSA-MIDLAND CORRIDOR STUDY. Public Meeting for Schematic Design

Complete Streets Accessible Networks for an Age-Friendly World

Shenango Valley MPO. State Transportation Commission 2015 Twelve Year Program Development

CASUALTY REVIEW

MULTIMODAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT

Rio Mills Rd/Berkmar Dr Extended Connection

Governor s Transportation Vision Panel

BICYCLE PUBLIC HEARING INTRODUCTION. Kathy Kleinschmidt, P.E. Bicycle and Pedestrian Coordinator Dallas District

What is the problem? Transportation Safety Planning Purdue Road School. 42,636 Fatalities. Nearly 3M Injuries. Over 4M PDO crashes

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

NORTH HOUSTON HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DRAFT NEED AND PURPOSE

Base Information. 1. Project Title County Line Road Shoulder Improvements. Start: County Line Road/17 th Avenue End: County Line Road/State Highway 66

Measuring Success: Performance Metrics and Project Selection

Sustainable Transportation Planning in the Portland Region

100 Most Congested Roadways in Texas

DES MOINES AREA MPO. Presentation to Iowa Commercial Real Estate Association. April 6, 2017

Planning and Programming Committee Meeting April 14,

Richmond Area MPO Regional Transportation and Land Use Performance Measures 2013

Pennsylvania Highway Statistics

Bicycle and Pedestrian Level of Service Evaluation

Performance-Based Planning for Safety in a Vision Zero World. AMPO September 27, 2018

Parks Highway: MP Lucus Road to Big Lake Road

2. Context. Existing framework. The context. The challenge. Transport Strategy

I-35 Corridor Segment Committee NW Loop 410 San Antonio, Texas. February 11, :00 AM to Noon

405 Express Lanes General Information & Frequently Asked Questions

Performance Measure Summary - San Jose CA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Town of Superior. Superior Trails Plan

Performance Measure Summary - Chicago IL-IN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Denver-Aurora CO. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Planning Committee STAFF REPORT March 7, 2018 Page 2 of 4 The following MTSOs are being used across the five subregions: Intersection Level of Service

Passenger Rail in Virginia

Stress Bikeway Network

Memorandum. From: Jakob zumfelde, Transportation Planner Date: November 7, 2018 Reference: Long Range Transportation Plan

REGIONAL SAFETY ADVISORY COMMITTEE North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Council Room Friday, October 26, :00 am AGENDA

BICYCLE PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE. Transportation and Trinity River Project Council Committee June 13, 2016

Vision Zero Task Force February 28, Collision Landscape Analysis

Measuring the Distribution and Costs of Congestion. Tim Lomax Texas Transportation Institute

Improving Mobility Without Building More Lanes

What is the Congestion Management Process? What is Congestion? Growth in the Treasure Valley Development and Congestion

I-105 Corridor Sustainability Study (CSS)

THE I-79 CORRIDOR. I-79 provides motorists with connections to the following major highways: I-80, PA 358, PA 965 and PA 208.

Utah Department of Transportation Division of Asset Management taking care of what we have

MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN

Tulsa Metropolitan Area LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Appendix PIT Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Pedestrian Safety: A Federal Perspective. Emmett McDevitt Transportation Safety Engineer September 28, 2010

Fresno Council of Governments Community Workshop. Tuesday, April 25, 2017 Hoover High School Fresno, California

National Capital Region Congestion Report

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

Performance measures for nonmotorized

APPLICATION OVERVIEW APPLICATION FORM OUTLINE

Walking & Bicycling Questionnaire for Candidates

Rail Station Fact Sheet DFW Airport North Station* (*station under construction with anticipated start of service in late 2018)

Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin

Palm Beach MPO Complete Streets Policy

Highway Project Scoring Worksheet Project Name: Ike Brooks Rd/Rives Chapel Church Rd Improvements (SPOT ID: H090571)

Transcription:

Performance Measures Target Setting NCTCOG Public Meetings October 8,15,18, 2018

Performance-Based Planning Mobility 2045 Regional Goals Performance Measures Measure System Performance and Report Progress Targets Project Selection and Funding 2019-2022 TIP 2

Regional Performance Planning Implement Required Federal Measures National Performance Support TxDOT Targets as Much as Possible State Performance Set Additional Goals to Support Mobility 2045 Regional Performance Tell Our Story Inform the Mobility Plan Inform the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) 3

Federal Measures Target Status Complete Rulemaking Number of Measures MPO Target Setting Deadline Reporting Period Reporting Schedule 4 Transit Asset Management Safety Performance Pavement and Bridge System Performance 4 12/27/2017 Annually Annually 5 2/27/2018 Annually Annually 6 11/15/2018 6 11/15/2018 Four-Year Performance Periods Four-Year Performance Periods Biennially Biennially

Adopted Transit Asset Management Targets 5 Images: DART, DCTA, Trinity Metro Rolling Stock Transit Passenger Vehicles Infrastructure Rail Tracks Equipment Transit Support Vehicles Facilities Buildings, Stations, Park and Ride Facilities 2018 Targets* 0% 0% 0% 0% *Regional targets approved by RTC on December 14, 2017. Targets will be reviewed annually.

Adopted Safety Targets Two Percent Reduction by Year 2022 Category TxDOT 2018 Targets NCTCOG 2018 Targets* Number of Fatalities 3,704 665 Fatality Rate 1.432 0.96 Number of Serious Injuries 17,565 3,612 Serious Injury Rate 6.74 5.18 Number of Non-motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries 2,151 560 Regional Safety Position: Even one death on the transportation system is unacceptable. NCTCOG staff is working to develop a regional Towards Zero Deaths Plan for North Central Texas. 6 *Regional targets approved by RTC on December 14, 2017. Targets are based on five-year averages and will be reviewed annually.

Federal Performance Measures Pavement and Bridge 1. Interstate Pavement Good 2. Interstate Pavement Poor 3. Non-Interstate Pavement Good 4. Non-Interstate Pavement Poor 5. Bridge Condition Good 6. Bridge Condition Poor System Performance 7. Interstate Reliability 8. Non-Interstate NHS Reliability 9. Truck Travel Time Reliability Index 10. Peak Hour Excessive Delay 11. Percent Non-SOV Mode Share 12. On-Road Mobile Source Emissions Reduction Nitrous Oxide (NOx) Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) 7

8 National Highway System Within MPA

Proposed RTC Position On Pavement Condition NCTCOG Supports TxDOT Statewide 2022 Good Condition Targets for National Highway System Pavements NCTCOG Supports TxDOT Statewide 2022 Poor Condition Targets for National Highway System Pavements Collaboration With TxDOT To Plan and Program Projects Contributing Toward Accomplishment of Pavement Goals Will Also Include The Following Action: NCTCOG Will Work With Local Governments To Focus On Improvement Of NHS Off-system Arterials In Poor Condition 9

ID Roadway Pavement Condition Targets Roadway Categories STATE of TEXAS Good Pavement Condition Total Network 2018 Baseline 2022 Target 1 Interstate National Highway System (NHS) 19.19% 66.80% 66.40% 2 Non-Interstate National Highway System (NHS) 80.81% 54.40% 52.30% Poor Pavement Condition 3 Interstate National Highway System (NHS) 19.19% 0.30% 0.30% 4 Non-Interstate National Highway System (NHS) 80.81% 13.80% 14.30% North Central Texas Region Interstates (on-system) 1 25.90% 2 5.81% 3 7.99% 3 Non-Interstate Freeway (on-system) 1 13.40% 2 6.76% 3 8.93% 3 Toll Roads (off-system) 6.70% 2 8.43% 3 9.32% 3 Arterials (on-system) 1 30.30% 2 18.52% 3 18.39% 3 Arterials (off-system) 23.80% 2 73.66% 3 69.82% 3 10 1 On-system refers to the TxDOT System 2 Mobility 2045 Plan 2018 Baseline Network Lane-Miles 3 Based on 5-year moving average

Proposed RTC Bridge Condition Targets ID *Based on total deck area Bridges State of Texas 2018 Baseline 2022 Target Good Condition 5 All National Highway System Facilities* 50.63% 50.42% Poor Condition 6 All National Highway System Facilities* 0.88% 0.80% NCTCOG supports TxDOT statewide 2022 Good/Poor Condition targets for NHS bridges Collaboration with TxDOT to plan & program projects contributing toward accomplishment of pavement goals will also include the following action: 11 NCTCOG will focus on expedited programming to improve NHS bridges in poor condition

7 Interstate Reliability 87.0% MPO May Adopt its own Targets that Differ from State DOT Targets Reliable Travel Time (%) 85.0% 83.0% 81.0% 79.0% 77.0% 75.0% 73.0% 71.0% 69.0% 67.0% Applies to Interstates Baseline (2017) 77.3% 2020 Target 78.6% Slight Increase in Reliability: Programmed mobility improvements counteract growth in population and VMT 2022 Target 79.5% 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Better Worse Adjusted Historic Trend Targets 12 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2020 2022 Statewide Baseline and Targets 79.6% 61.2% 56.6% TTI Suggested Baseline and Targets (NCTCOG MPA) 77.3% 65.0% 60.0% Adjusted Historic Trend (NCTCOG MPA) 75.4% 77.9% 75.1% 74.7% 77.3% Baseline and Proposed MPO Targets 77.3% 78.6% 79.5%

8 Non-Interstate NHS Reliability Reliable Travel Time (%) 85.0% 83.0% 81.0% 79.0% 77.0% 75.0% 73.0% 71.0% 69.0% 67.0% MPO May Adopt its own Targets that Differ from State DOT Targets Applies to Non-Interstate NHS Baseline (2017) 71.1% Maintain Existing Reliability Conditions: Programmed Mobility improvements Counteract Growth in Population and VMT 2022 Target 71.1% Better Worse 65.0% 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Adjusted Historic Trend Targets 13 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2020 2022 Statewide Baseline and Target 80.4% N/A 55.4% TTI/TxDOT Suggested Baseline and Target (NCTCOG MPA) 71.1% N/A 43.0% Adjusted Historic Trend (NCTCOG MPA) 76.3% 77.8% 73.8% 72.4% 71.1% Baseline and Proposed MPO Targets 71.1% N/A 71.1%

9 Truck Travel Time Reliability Index 2.40 MPO May Adopt its own Targets that Differ from State DOT Targets Truck Travel Time Reliability Index 2.20 2.00 1.80 1.60 1.40 Applies to Interstates Baseline (2017) 1.74 Continue Improvement: 2020 Target 1.71 Similar to Historic Trend 2022 Target 1.66 Worse Better 1.20 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Adjusted Historic Trend Targets 14 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2020 2022 Statewide Baseline and Target 1.50 1.70 1.79 TTI/TxDOT Suggested Baseline and Target (NCTCOG MPA) 1.74 2.40 2.50 Adjusted Historic Trend (NCTCOG MPA) 1.87 1.72 1.70 1.74 1.74 Baseline and Proposed MPO Targets 1.74 1.71 1.66

10 Peak Hour Excessive Delay 24 22 MPO and State DOT Must Agree on a Single Regional Target Peak Hour Excessive Delay (hours) 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 Applies to DFW Urbanized Area Baseline (2017) 15.5 Maintain Existing Conditions: Programmed Mobility Improvements Counteract Growth in Population and VMT 2022 Target 16.0 Worse Better 4 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Adjusted Historic Trend Targets 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2020 2022 Statewide Baseline and Target N/A TxDOT Baseline and Adopted Target (DFW UA) 15.5 N/A 16.0 Adjusted Historic Trend (DFW UA) 8.9 10.7 13 13.7 15.5 Baseline and Proposed MPO Target 15.5 N/A 16.0 15

11 Percent of Trips Non-Single Occupant Vehicle (% Non-SOV) 23.5% MPO and State DOT Must Agree on a Single Regional Target Percent Non-SOV Trips 22.5% 21.5% 20.5% 19.5% 18.5% 17.5% Applies to DFW Urbanized Area Baseline (2016) 19.5% 2020 Target 19.9% Continue Improvement: 2022 Target 20.2% Similar to historic trend Better Worse 16.5% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Observed Targets 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2020 2022 Statewide Baseline and Target N/A TxDOT Baseline and Adopted Target (DFW UA) 19.5% 19.9% 20.2% Adjusted Historic Trend (DFW UA) 19.1% 18.9% 19.2% 19.3% 19.5% Baseline and Proposed MPO Target 19.5% 19.9% 20.2% 16

12 Air Quality Targets Nitrous Oxide (NOx) Reductions Combined Targets 2019-2020: 2,892.96 kg/day 2019-2022: 5,062.68 kg/day Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Reductions Combined Targets 2019-2020: 599.67 kg/day 2019-2022: 1,079.40 kg/day MPO May Adopt its own Targets that Differ from State DOT Targets, but NCTCOG Worked Closely with TxDOT and Other MPOs on this Measure Applies to DFW Urbanized Area Harmful Emissions Declining 17

Proposed Regional Transportation Council Future Action Agree to Support the TxDOT Statewide Targets for NHS Pavement and Bridge Conditions Focus on the Improvement of Regional NHS Off-System Arterial Pavements and NHS Bridges in Poor Condition Adopt Regional Targets for Interstate Reliability, Non- Interstate Reliability, and Truck Reliability Adopt Regional Targets Identical to TxDOT s Regional Targets for Peak Hour Excessive Delay, Non-SOV Travel, and Emissions Reductions 18

Schedule July 27 STTC Information Item Performance Measures and Targets August 9 RTC Information Item Performance Measures and Targets August 24 STTC Workshop Performance Measures and Targets September 13 RTC Information Item September 28 STTC Information Item Draft Targets October 8, 15, 18 Public Meetings October 11 RTC Information Item Draft Targets October 26 STTC Action Item - Recommend Approval of Final Targets November 8 RTC Action Item Approval of Final Targets November 15 Target Adoption Deadline 19

Questions Dan Lamers Senior Program Manager dlamers@nctcog.org (817) 695-9263 20

21

Emissions Reductions (kg/day) On-Road Mobile Source Emissions Reductions (NO X ) 5000 4500 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 Higher Emissions Reductions are Better MPO May Adopt its own Targets that Differ from State DOT Targets, but NCTCOG Worked Closely with TxDOT and Other MPOs on this Measure Baseline (2018) 2,410.8 kg/day Applies to DFW Urbanized Area 2020 Target 2,892.96 kg/day 2022 Target 5,062.68 kg/day 1000 500 0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Observed Annual New Reductions Predicted Annual New Reductions 22 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Observed Annual New Reductions 4,230.22 3,720.74 1,998.06 2,420.93 Predicted Annual New Reductions 2,410.8 1,446.48 1,446.48 1,084.86 1,084.86

On-Road Mobile Source Emissions Reductions (VOC) 1000 900 800 Higher Emissions Reductions are Better MPO May Adopt its own Targets that Differ from State DOT Targets, but NCTCOG Worked Closely with TxDOT and Other MPOs on this Measure Applies to DFW Urbanized Area Emissions Reductions (kg/day) 700 600 500 400 300 Baseline (2018) 499.72 kg/day 2020 Target 599.67 kg/day 2022 Target 1,079.40 kg/day 200 100 0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Observed Annual New Reductions Predicted Annual New Reductions 23 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Observed Annual New Reductions 883.10 687.64 455.44 642.22 Predicted Annual New Reductions 499.72 299.83 299.83 239.87 239.87