Joint Capabilities Development and Acquisition 2010 Ground Robotics Capabilities Conference & Exhibition Dual Use Combat Developers Panel Col Mark D. LaViolette, USMC Capabilities and Acquisition Division (CAD) Joint Staff, J 8 1
Bottom Line Up Front (BLUF) Balancing Act: Requirements, Resources, Acquisition Big A vs. Little A Standard acquisition process slow but effective Rapid Acquisition (e.g, JUONS) when appropriate Other avenues: JCTD Resource Constrained Environment 2
Joint Staff J8 Mission RESOURCE ALLOCATION REQUIREMENTS DETERMINATION ACQUISITION Requirement Determination Planning, studies, analysis, assessments Resource Allocation Programming/Budgeting Acquisition Execution Deliver the required capabilities 3 Assist in Delivering the Right Mix of Capabilities for the Joint Force Commanders
Challenge of Rapid Acquisition Future Focused Very Structured Process Evolved Requirements Analysis of Alternatives Lengthy Development High Visibility on Program Large Investment 4 little Now focused More ad hoc process Broad requirement Quick assessment of alternatives Limited development High visibility on results Limited investment Very Limited Feedback Transition to Program of Record
10 Total CENTCOM JUONs C-IED related 3 Active / 7 Fielded Additional robots included in surge requirements Enhancements: Deployment systems from vehicles Detachable toolkits Long-range antennas Video capture JUON Robots 5 Talon Robot MARCBOT Devil Pup (SUGV 3000) PackBot
New & Accelerated JCTD Process 6 MOS 12 MOS 18 MOS 24 MOS Selection Legacy Selection Process (includes JROC validation) Start Execution Candidate Decision Board Executable (Tech Readiness Lvl (TRL) 5-7) Addresses valid need OSD / DDR&E Chair JS / J8 DDR CO-Chair Start JROC Legacy Execution Process Program Review Board: Transfer to Program Of Record (POR); or Deliver residuals satisfying need; or Terminate Forward to JROC for validation Quarterly Program Review Boards CUGV JCTD Success Selection Start Execution JROC Selection Start Execution JROC 6 Joint Capability Technology Demonstrations (JCTD) Quarterly Starts / Transfer to POR as appropriate
TY $ in B 7 750 700 650 600 550 500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 316 19 297 345 17 328 437 72 468 91 479 79 535 124 169 365 377 400 411 432 542+ 659+ 667 662? 601? 187 149 128 50 480 513 531 542 551 50 561 50 575 50 589 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Bas e OCO Supplemental Federal Budget Percentage 100% 100% 90% 90% 80% 80% Percentage of the Federal Budget 70% 70% 60% 60% 50% 50% 40% 40% 30% 30% 20% 20% 10% 10% 0% 0% 1962 1962 1964 1965 1966 1968 1968 1970 1971 6% 1972 1974 1974 Defense Funding 601 Fiscal Year Federal Spending National National Defense Defense Non-Defense Non-Defense Discretionary Discretionary 1976 FY 1964 22% 21% 1977 1978 1980 51% 1980 1982 1983 1984 Net Interest Mandatory Mandatory 1986 1986 1988 1990 1992 Fiscal Year Fiscal Year FY 2004 55% 1989 1992 19% 7% 1994 1996 19% 1995 1998 1998 2000 2002 2001 2004 2006 2008 FY 2014 58% 2004 15% Projection* 611 625 639 Note: *FY10 OMB Budget Blueprint 2007 12% PROJECTION 2010 15% Downward Budget Pressures Projection 2012 2010 2014 2013 Defense as a Percentage of GDP Federal Deficit/Surplus Mounting deficits, interest payments & entitlement spending will result in downward pressure to defense budgets 40% (% of GDP) 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% Surplus / Deficit as % of GDP 5% 0% 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 4% 2% 0% -2% -4% -6% -8% -10% -12% WWII (1945) 34.5% 1969 KOREA (1953) 11.7% 1971 TY $ in B % of GDP 1973 1975 200 0-200 -400-600 -800-1,000-1,200-1,400-1,600 1977 VIETNAM (1968) 8.9% Notes: *FY10 DoD funding includes $161B for OCO & Supplemental **FY12-15 DoD funding includes $50B/year for OCO 1979 1981 1983 1985 Federal Surplus / Deficit GDP (CY00 $B) Key Summary 1987 1989 FY08 $459B FY09 $1552B FY10 $1449B FY11 $1173B FY12 $939B 1991 1940 1942 1944 1946 1948 1950 1952 1954 1956 1958 1960 1962 1964 1966 1968 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 FY10 (3.7% Base & 4.8% including OCO / Supp): GDP: $14,439B (CBO est.) Base: $531B OCO / Supp: $161B REAGAN BUILD UP (1986) 6.0% 1993 1995 1997 GULF WAR (1991) 4.4% 1999 2001 2003 40-year average (1969-2009): -2.6% 2005 2007 2009 FY10* 4.8% Projections: FY10-19 GDP and DoD % based on OMB and CBO projections 2011 Projection OMB FY15** 3.7% 2013 2015 CBO 2017 Projection $18,000 (CY00 $B) $16,000 $14,000 $12,000 $10,000 $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 $2,000 $0 2019
Conclusion J 8 committed to fielding right mix of Joint capabilities Use rapid acquisition process when appropriate Balancing priorities is critical RESOURCE ALLOCATION REQUIREMENTS DETERMINATION ACQUISITION 8
9
10 BACKUP SLIDES
Capability Based Assessment and Acquisition Processes JIC JIC JCB Review JROC Approve Capability Gap Validation JCB Review CBA Plan JCB Approval CBA CBA ICD Technical Approach Change DOTmLPF DCR KPPs OSD Services Decision Meetings JS/COCOMS ICD Refine & Produce System JROC Approve Risk OK Gap Validated Done Additional Analysis JCB Review JROC Approval CDD KSAs Cost Schedule Risk Affordability ICD CDD CPD Production Weapon System Performance MDD Mat l Solution Analysis Milestone A Technology Development Milestone B Engineering & Manufacturing Dev Milestone C Produce & Deploy LRIP FRP 11
Rapid Fielding Framework JUON Process Consists of Four Phases: GENERATION PHASE VETTING PHASE EQUIPPING PHASE OPERATIONS AND SUPPORT PHASE Force Commander Identifies Urgent Need Combatant Staff determines the most suitable process COCOM CoS certifies and submits to Joint Staff (DJ-8 RMD) J-8 RMD Receives and verifies that JUON meets submission criteria JUON is reviewed and routed Solutions are identified JRAC determines a resourcing Strategy. Interim Sponsor creates a Simplified Acquisition Plan Procures and deliver solution to the Warfighter Provide Progress Reports On Performance, Cost, and Schedule Interim Sponsor sustains solution and monitors performance for twenty- four months Interim Sponsor, COCOM, and FCB prepare Capability Review to Address final disposition of fielded system. SPEED IS LIFE 12
$40M $30M $20M $10M 13 JCTD Historical Perspective All JCTDs: 2006 Present, DDR&E Funding Pre-FY10 JCTD FY10 JCTD FY11+ New JCTD Process FY10 Interim JCTD Process Legacy JCTD Process PHPG SFOB Classified PGSS PEOPLE CD-CIE TEDS Sea Tracker OP3D JRaDS CSE JMDSE FW APKWS ISOM PEAK R2TD FITE NZP APP MADSS DW NSLDSS RIO AWSS CAMS PAWS TISC CABLE JMEWS Medusa JSuW CORPORAL OB1 HTVSF Common Ground C2 Gap Filler ADAS JFPASS CHAMP CHAMPION IRIS GO FY11+ JCTD 6 Mos 12 Mos 18 Mos 24 Mos 30 Mos 36 Mos 42 Mos 48 Mos