SEDAR 63: Gulf Menhaden

Similar documents
S E D A R Southeast Data, Assessment, and Review

Brief History of the Gulf Menhaden Purse-Seine Fishery. Ray Mroch NMFS Beaufort Laboratory

Update on the 2017 Atlantic Menhaden Fishing Season

Agenda Item G.1.a Supplemental CDFW Report 2 September 2015

2001 STATUS OF ATLANTIC MENHADEN STOCK AND FISHERY

For-hire Data Collection. Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council Red Snapper For-hire Advisory Panel December 2-3, 2014 Tampa, FL

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE UPDATE ON LANDINGS OF TUNA, SWORDFISH AND OTHER PELAGICS

The Economics of Atlantic Highly Migratory Species For-Hire Fishing Trips July - November 2013 Clifford Hutt and George Silva

Economic and operational characteristics of the Hawaii longline fleet in 2000

Black Seabass Length Frequencies and Condition of Released Fish from At-Sea Headboat Observer Surveys, 2004 to 2010.

Beverly Sauls SEDAR31-DW11. 5 August 2012

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE UPDATE ON LANDINGS OF TUNA, SWORDFISH AND OTHER PELAGICS

Overview of herring related findings of NCEAS Portfolio Effects Working Group

REVIEW OF BIGEYE TUNA CATCH INCLUDING FISH SIZE BY JAPANESE LONGLINE FISHERY IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN

June NMFS Address 11, 2014 (NOAA): Council Address. Dover, DE 19901

Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission

Mississippi s Shore Night Fishing Survey. Marine Recreational Fisheries Statistics Survey. January 2001 December 2002.

SCDNR Charterboat Logbook Program Data, Mike Errigo, Eric Hiltz, and Amy Dukes SEDAR32-DW-08

Gulf of Mexico Penaeid Shrimp Stock Assessment Update for 2016

Assessing the Accuracy of High Spatial Resolution Effort Data

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE SECOND REGULAR SESSION August 2006 Manila, Philippines

U.S. National Observer Program, Southeast Regional Fishery Observer Programs & Regional Electronic Technology Implementation Plans Jane DiCosimo

ASMFC Stock Assessment Overview: Atlantic Menhaden

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Coastal Migratory Pelagic Resources of the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Region;

6 th Meeting of the Scientific Committee Puerto Varas, Chile, 9-14 September SC6-Doc21 Chinese Taipei s Annual Report

Management under the Highly Migratory Species Fishery Management Plan

Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic; Reef Fish Fishery of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands;

Billing Code: P. Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic;

Assessment of participation and resource impact of shrimp baiting in coastal South Caroling during Dale Theiling SEDAR-PW6-RD36.

United States Commercial Vertical Line Vessel Standardized Catch Rates of Red Grouper in the US South Atlantic,

Discards of red grouper (Epinephelus morio) for the headboat fishery in the US Gulf of Mexico SEDAR 42- DW- 17

Craig A. Brown. NOAA Fisheries, Southeast Fisheries Center, Sustainable Fisheries Division 75 Virginia Beach Drive, Miami, FL, , USA

FISHERY ASSESSMENT REPORT

WORKING GROUP ON STOCK ASSESSMENTS 5 TH MEETING DOCUMENT SAR-5-05 BET A

DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME

Cami T. McCandless and Joesph J. Mello SEDAR39- DW June 2014

DSBG Findings Helping Fishermen and Policy Makers Explore the Economics of Deep Set Buoy Gear in the West Coast Swordfish Fishery

Atlantic Menhaden Stock Assessment Update

Population Characteristics of Gulf Menhaden, Brevoortia patronus

Estimates of Historic Recreational Landings of Red Snapper in the South Atlantic Using the FHWAR Census Method SEDAR 41-DW17

Department of Fish and Game

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic;

PACIFIC BLUEFIN TUNA STOCK ASSESSMENT

SCDNR Charterboat Logbook Program Data,

International Fisheries; Pacific Tuna Fisheries; Revised 2018 Commercial Fishing

Status of Albacore Fishing by Malaysian Tuna Longliners in the Southwest of Indian Ocean. Effarina Mohd Faizal, Sallehudin Jamon & Samsudin Basir

Stock Assessment Update for Pink Shrimp (Farfantepenaeus duorarum) in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico for 2015

Chairman J. Mareska called the meeting to order at 1 :40 p.m. The following members and others were present:

Red Snapper distribution on natural habitats and artificial structures in the northern Gulf of Mexico

"Present status of Tropical tuna fisheries in Iran"

Southeast Regional Office:

SCTB16 Working Paper FTWG 5

PHILIPPINE FISHERIES OBSERVER PROGRAMME

August 3, Prepared by Rob Cheshire 1 & Joe O Hop 2. Center for Coastal Fisheries and Habitat Research Beaufort, NC

Fishery Dependent Data Collection Office of Science and Technology

Marine Recreational Information Program Transition to Improved Survey Designs

ATLANTIC STATES MARINE FISHERIES COMMISSION. Winter Flounder Abundance and Biomass Indices from State Fishery-Independent Surveys

Estimates of Historic Recreational Landings of Vermilion Snapper in the South Atlantic Using the FHWAR Census Method. Ken Brennan SEDAR 55-WP04

6 th Meeting of the Scientific Committee Puerto Varas, Chile, 9-14 September SC6-Doc15 The Russian Federation s Annual Report

Fishing Capacity and Efficient Fleet Configuration for the Tuna Purse Seine Fishery in the Eastern Pacific Ocean: An Economic Approach

Stock Assessment Update for White Shrimp (Litopenaeus setiferus) in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico for 2014

NEW ENGLAND FISHERY MANAGEMENT COUNCIL. Herring PDT Report May 1, 2003 Holiday Inn, Mansfield, MA

ASMFC Stock Assessment Overview: Red Drum

Estimates of Historic Recreational Landings of Red Snapper in the South Atlantic Using the FHWAR Census Method SEDAR41-DW17 DRAFT

Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission

Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission

STATISTICS OF THE FRENCH PURSE SEINE FISHING FLEET TARGETING TROPICAL TUNAS IN THE INDIAN OCEAN ( )

Standardized catch rates of U.S. blueline tilefish (Caulolatilus microps) from commercial logbook longline data

GULF COUNCIL MOTIONS AUGUST 20-23, 2012 NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South

SEDAR52-WP November 2017

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATES OF BLUE AND MAKO SHARKS BYCATCH AND CPUE OF TAIWANESE LONGLINE FISHERY IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN

Addendum to SEDAR16-DW-22

6 th Meeting of the Scientific Committee Puerto Varas, Chile, 9-14 September 2018

Gulf menhaden (Brevoortia patronus) in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico: Fishery characteristics and biological reference points for management SEDAR27-RD-08

Zooplankton community structure in the northern Gulf of Mexico: Implications for ecosystem management

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic;

Estimation of king mackerel bycatch in the shrimp trawl fishery in the US Gulf of Mexico (GOM) and South Atlantic (SA)

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Pacific Island Pelagic Fisheries; 2016 U.S. Territorial

Keeping Gulf Red Snapper on the Road to Recovery

Monitoring the length structure of commercial landings of albacore tuna during the fishing year

Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission

Marshall Islands National Tuna Fishery Report

Cost Recovery Annual Report Trawl Rationalization Program

Summary of current information available on Coastal Pelagic Species with emphasis on Northern Anchovy

Modifications to Gulf Reef Fish and South Atlantic Snapper Grouper Fishery Management Plans

6 th Meeting of the Scientific Committee Puerto Varas, Chile, 9-14 September 2018

STANDARDIZED CATCH RATES OF BLUEFIN TUNA, THUNNUS THYNNUS, FROM THE ROD AND REEL/HANDLINE FISHERY OFF THE NORTHEAST UNITED STATES DURING

Oregon's Sardine Fishery 2006 Summary

Preliminary Draft of. SEDAR 17 Data Workshop Vermilion Snapper Report. Commercial Fishery (Section 3)

INTER-AMERICAN TROPICAL TUNA COMMISSION SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOURTH MEETING. La Jolla, California (USA) 29 April - 3 May 2013

ANNUAL OREGON ALBACORE TUNA (Thunnus alalunga) REPORT, 2013

Updated landings information for the commercial fisheries in Puerto Rico with emphasis on silk and queen snapper and parrotfish fisheries

Taiwan Tuna Fisheries in the Western Pacific Ocean

New England Fishery Management Council

Climatic and marine environmental variations associated with fishing conditions of tuna species in the Indian Ocean

Draft Addendum V For Board Review. Coastal Sharks Management Board August 8, 2018

Chapter 14: Conducting Roving and Access Site Angler Surveys

Challenges in communicating uncertainty of production and timing forecasts to salmon fishery managers and the public

Fishery Participation and Location Choice

Transcription:

SEDAR 63: Gulf Menhaden Fishery Dependent Data Collection at the NMFS Beaufort Laboratory Ray Mroch NMFS Beaufort Laboratory SEDAR 63 Review Workshop November 6, 2018

Fishery-Dependent Data for the Gulf Menhaden Fishery Maintained at the NMFS Beaufort Lab in three large data files: 1. Catch Records: Landings and nominal fishing effort 2. Port Samples: Size and age composition of the catch 3. Captain s Daily Fishing Reports (CDFRs, or logbooks): Itemize set location, catch, distance from shore, etc for each purse-seine set

Catch Records: Catch/Effort Data Since 1964, the gulf menhaden fishery has reported their daily vessel unload values (= landings), usually on a monthly basis In 1960s, industry allowed NMFS biologists access to company records - back to the 1940s able to re-construct monthly/total landings and fishing effort back to 1948 Daily vessel unloads are in thousands of standard fish by convention, 1,000 std fish = 670 lbs converted to metric tons (x 0.3039) In recent years, vessel unloads are reported to the NMFS daily or weekly via spreadsheet attachment to email

Landings reported to the NMFS Landings are daily vessel unloads, and in thousands of standard fish One hopper dump (22,000 cu. in.) = 1,000 std fish One standard fish = 2/3 lb One hopper dump = 670 lb or 0.3039 mt J. Kutkuhn ms (1966)

Older catch records, ~1964-2005 Hand-copied from plant records/ledgers Key-entered into NMFS Beaufort Catch Records data base

Company catch records since ~2005 via daily spreadsheets

Total Reduction Fishery Landings of Gulf Menhaden Catch records summed across all plant-months to get: Total gulf menhaden landings for the fishing season

Landings (1,000 mt) Landings in the Gulf Menhaden Fishery, 1955-2017 1,200 1,000 1984 800 1971 1978 1994 600 400 2010 200 0 Fishing Year

Nominal or Observed Fishing Effort Catch records do not list active fishing days Logbooks placed on gulf vessels in 1960s, but compliance incomplete program discontinued in late 1960s, but revived in late 1970s as CDFRs Nicholson (1971) argued that a vessel-week on the Atlantic coast was satisfactory unit of nominal effort [1 vessel, fishing at least 1 day of a given wk] Chapoton (1971) noted that on the Gulf coast, fish catching ability was more related to size of the vessel and its fish hold capacity thus, a vessel-ton-week became the preferred measure of nominal effort for the gulf menhaden fishery = one vessel, fishing at least one day of a week, times its net tonnage

1,000 Metric Tons 1,000 Vessel-Ton-Weeks Catch and Nominal Effort for the Gulf Menhaden Fishery, 1948-2017 1,200 700 1,000 600 800 600 500 400 300 400 200 200 0 Gulf menhaden landings (1,000 metric tons) Nominal fishing effort (1,000 vessel-ton-weeks) 100 0 Figure 4.2 in Report

Landings (1,000 mt) Gulf Menhaden reduction landings (1000mt) and nominal fishing effort (vtw), 1948-2017. 1,000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 r 2 = 0.76 0 200 400 600 Nominal Effort (vtw) Figure 4.4 in Report

The Port Samples: Size and Age Composition of the Catch

Two-stage cluster design: Menhaden Sampling First-stage (vessels or sets): Vessels chosen at random Top of fish hold assumed to be last set of the trip Fishing location received from logbook or crew Second-stage (fish from bucket or dip net): Originally, 20 fish randomly chosen from sample for size and age composition and processed for: Fork length in mm Weight in grams and scales removed for ageing In 1972, sample size reduced to 10 fish Within-sample variation smaller than among-sample

Methodology for estimating catch in numbers-at-age: Merge catch records with the port samples Used consistently over time (Nelson & Ahrenholz 1986; Vaughan 1987; Vaughan et al. 1996, 2000, 2007) Detailed sampling of landings allows biomass to be converted into catch in numbers-at-age For each port/week, port sampling provides estimate of mean weight and age distribution of fish caught Dividing total landings for given port/week by mean weight of sampled fish allows the numbers of fish landed to be estimated Age proportion then allows numbers at age to be estimated Sum across all port/weeks to get total numbers-at-age in total landings SAS statistical routine (BS003) re-written by D. Colby in late 1990s better accounts for port/weeks without samples Catch-at-age matrix developed at the port/week level provides for considerably greater precision than is typical for most assessments

Merge catch records (landings) with the port samples on a port/week basis Total landings for given port/week are divided by mean weight of sampled fish Example: Landings 9,337,487 kg Avg fish weight 105.9 g = 88,151,870 fish

Merge catch records (landings) with the port samples on a port/week basis Total landings for given port/week are divided by mean weight of sampled fish Age proportion of port samples then allows numbers-at-age to be estimated Example: Landings 9,337,487 kg = 88,151,870 fish X 7.5% age-1 92.5% age-2 = 6,611,390 age-1 81,540,481 age-2 Avg fish weight 105.9 g 0 age-3 0 age-3

Merge catch records (landings) with the port samples on a port/week basis Total landings for given port/week are divided by mean weight of sampled fish Age proportion of port samples then allows numbers-at-age to be estimated Example: Landings 9,337,487 kg = 88,151,870 fish X 7.5% age-1 92.5% age-2 = 6,611,390 age-1 81,540,481 age-2 Avg fish weight 105.9 g 0 age-3 0 age-3 Sum across all port/weeks to get total numbers-at-age in total landings

Sampled Set Location Incorporated 1970s Proportion of catch for given area determined by locations of port samples and applied to landings Landings 6,069,366 kg Example: Total Landings 9,337,487 kg Landings 3,268,121 kg

Sampled Set Location Incorporated 1970s Proportion of catch for given area determined by locations of port samples and applied to landings Landings for port/week/area are divided by mean weight of sampled fish Total Landings 9,337,487 kg Landings 6,069,366 kg Avg fish weight 105.9 g Landings 3,268,121 kg Avg fish weight 98.7 g Example: = = 57,312,238 fish (area 6) 33,111,661 fish (area 7)

Sampled Set Location Incorporated 1970s Total Landings 9,337,487 kg Proportion of catch for given area determined by locations of port samples and applied to landings Landings for port/week/area are divided by mean weight of sampled fish Numbers-at-age estimated for each area from port sample proportions Example: Landings 6,069,366 kg Avg fish weight 105.9 g Landings 3,268,121 kg Avg fish weight 98.7 g = = 57,312,238 fish (area 6) 33,111,661 fish (area 7) X X 8.5% age-1 (area 6) 88% age-2 (area 6) 3.5% age-3 (area 6) 9% age-1 (area 7) 91% age-2 (area 7) 0 age-3 (area 7) = = 4,871,541 age-1 (area 6) 50,434,769 age-2 (area 6) 2,005,928 age-3 (area 6) 2,980,050 age-1 (area 7) 30,131,612 age-2 (area 7) 0 age-3 (area 7)

Sampled Set Location Incorporated 1970s Total Landings 9,337,487 kg Proportion of catch for given area determined by locations of port samples and applied to landings Landings for port/week/area are divided by mean weight of sampled fish Numbers-at-age estimated for each area from port sample proportions Example: Landings 6,069,366 kg Avg fish weight 105.9 g Landings 3,268,121 kg Avg fish weight 98.7 g = = 57,312,238 fish (area 6) 33,111,661 fish (area 7) 91% age-2 (area 7) 0 age-3 (area 7) Sum across all port/week/areas to get total numbers-at-age in total landings X X 8.5% age-1 (area 6) 88% age-2 (area 6) 3.5% age-3 (area 6) 9% age-1 (area 7) = = 4,871,541 age-1 (area 6) 50,434,769 age-2 (area 6) 2,005,928 age-3 (area 6) 2,980,050 age-1 (area 7) 30,131,612 age-2 (area 7) 0 age-3 (area 7)

Millions of Fish Total numbers Gulf Menhaden caught, 1964 2017 Gulf Menhaden Caught (in millions) 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0

Millions of Fish Total numbers of catch-at-age for gulf menhaden, 1964 2017 Gulf Menhaden Catch at Age (in millions) 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 age 4 age 3 age 2 age 1 age 0 6,000 4,000 2,000 0

Captain s Daily Fishing Report The Captain s Daily Fishing Report is a joint Industry, State, and Federal effort Began in late 1970s Updated to include latitude and longitude in 2009 Provides effort data for: Fishery Management Company Records From the CDFRs we get: Effort estimates (including days not fished) Days fishing Days not fishing (traveling, maintenance) Number, duration, and catch of sets Distance from shore Use (or not) of spotter pilot Environmental variables (air temperature, wind speed and direction, cloud cover) U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 25

Captain s Daily Fishing Report Timeline CDFR existed as paper files until ~1992 Not used as extensively as today, not routinely key-entered In 1992, NMFS Beaufort began saving Gulf CDFRs as dbase files In about 1999, collaborated with GSMFC to enter pre-1992 CDFR data sets Available electronically to 1983 Available on DVD from 1979 In 2009, NMFS Beaufort altered forms to use an optical scanner CHANGE: GPS locations of sets recorded from approximately 2004 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 26

Captain s Daily Fishing Report: Old

Captain s Daily Fishing Report: Current The Captain s Daily Fishing Report is a joint Industry, State, and Federal effort Initiated with Standard Products internal reporting system Provides effort data for: Fishery Management Company Records From the CDFRs we get: Effort estimates Days fishing Days travelling Number, duration, and results of sets U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 28

Alternate Estimates of Nominal Fishing Effort Traditional: From Catch Records: From CDFRs: Vessel-ton-weeks (VTW) Number of successful fishing trips Number of purse-seine sets

1948 1951 1954 1957 1960 1963 1966 1969 1972 1975 1978 1981 1984 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 2014 2017 Standardized Effort Comparison of Normalized Effort 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Vessel-Ton-Weeks Trips Sets Figure 4.5 in Report

1948 1951 1954 1957 1960 1963 1966 1969 1972 1975 1978 1981 1984 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 2014 2017 Standardized CPUE Comparison of Normalized CPUE 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Landings/VTW 0.0 Landings/Trip Figure 4.6 in Report

Questions?

Menhaden Sampling Time Line Samplers were temporary/seasonal Federal employees through ~1994 ~1994 lost all temporary Federal positions NMFS-wide Since ~1995, company dockside employees at Louisiana fish factories solicited to acquire weekly samples noting date, vessel, fishing location; freeze samples in chest freezers Target number of samples per week Paid a nominal fee for their services QA/QC: Date of sample checked against daily logbooks

Processing of Menhaden Samples from Louisiana Fish Factories ~1995-2003: GSMFC hired independent contractors to process samples from LA for size and age; forward data to NMFS Beaufort 2004 to present: GSMFC contracts w/ LDWF to process samples from Empire, Abbeville, and Cameron; forward data to NMFS Beaufort

Processing of Menhaden Samples From Mississippi Fish Factory 1995-2009, an employee of NMFS Pascagoula Lab acquired samples at fish factory in Moss Point, MS, and processed those samples; sent data to NMFS Beaufort In recent years, GSMFC has hired an independent contractor to process the samples and forward data to NMFS Beaufort.

Mean net tonnage of the gulf menhaden fleet by decade since 1970 Fishing Year Mean net tonnage No. of vessels in calculation Range of net tonnages 1970 248 72 80-386 1980 315 79 139-453 1990 317 75 147-447 2000 338 43 197-453 2010 361 32 293-453 2017 354 34 213-453 Table 4.10 in Report

% Catch-at-age Catch at Age 1964 2017 100% % age-3 % age-2 % age-1 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Figure 4.3 in Report