Updated August 1, 2016

Similar documents
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials An Application from the State Highway or Transportation Department of

Updated June 12, 2017

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials An Application from the State Highway or Transportation Department of

Updated August 1, 2016

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials

AASHTO Use Only Establishment of a U.S. (Interstate) Route IH 69 Action taken by SCOH: Extension of a U.S. (Interstate)Route

Application to AASHTO to recognize six suggested relocations of U.S. Bicycle Route 1 in the Northern Virginia District.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Virginia. for


Act 47 Exception Application Process (Permitting Bicycle Travel on Freeways)

AASHTO is in receipt of the following member department interstate application.

Geometric Design Tables

A plan for improved motor vehicle access on Railroad Avenue in Provincetown

Who is Toole Design Group?

Town of Orangetown Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program

Long Island Rail Road Expansion Project Floral Park to Hicksville

Residential Traffic Calming Program Guide. Town of Ashland, Virginia

NCHRP Task 350. U.S. Bicycle Route Signing

guide signs or groups of signs. General provisions are given in Sections 2A.07, 2A.08, and 2A.10. Standard:

Progress Report on the Design and Planning of an Infrastructure Improvement Project for the Sunnyside TIF District (Phase II)

City of Roseville Section 13 Design Standards. _Bikeways January 2016 SECTION 13 BIKEWAYS

TOWN OF PAYSON TRAFFIC CALMING MANUAL

Sponsored by the Office of Traffic and Safety of the Iowa Department of Transportation NOVEMBER 2001 CTRE

Roadway Design Manual

1609 E. FRANKLIN STREET HOTEL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Malvern Borough Local Traffic Calming

Town of Clarkstown Traffic Calming Program. Table of Contents

Off-road Trails. Guidance

CHAPTER 2D. GUIDE SIGNS CONVENTIONAL ROADS Section 2D.01 Scope of Conventional Road Guide Sign Standards Standard:

Route 47 (North Main Street) Reconstruction

South Carolina Department of Transportation. Engineering Directive

MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES INTRODUCTION

Gordon Proctor Director Policy on Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel on ODOT Owned or Maintained Facilities

RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION, WATERWAYS AND RAIL DIVISION CHAPTER RAILROAD GRADE CROSSING STANDARDS

Appendix C. Bicycle Route Signage

Bicycle - Motor Vehicle Collisions on Controlled Access Highways in Arizona

Access Management in the Vicinity of Intersections

CHAPTER 3A. GENERAL PAGE CHAPTER 3B. PAVEMENT AND CURB MARKINGS PAGE

Roadway Design Manual

Attachment No. 13. National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices RWSTC RECOMMENDATION FOLLOWING SPONSOR COMMENTS

Construction Specifications Manual

Engineering Report: Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests. Black Mesa Ranger District. Analysis of. National Forest System Roads (NFSRs) #s 504 & 169

PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 405 LIMB MANAGEMENT

Recommended Roadway Plan Section 2 - Land Development and Roadway Access

CHAPTER 16 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT STUDY

November 2012: The following Traffic and Safety Notes were revised:

Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin

appendix b BLOS: Bicycle Level of Service B.1 Background B.2 Bicycle Level of Service Model Winston-Salem Urban Area

CHAPTER 2D. GUIDE SIGNS CONVENTIONAL ROADS Section 2D.01 Scope of Conventional Road Guide Sign Standards Standard:

Session 1 23 CFR 772: Type I Project Definitions

NCHRP Superelevation Criteria for Sharp Horizontal Curves on Steep Grades. Research Team: MRIGlobal Pennsylvania State University

City of Madison, East Johnson Street North Baldwin Street to First Street Local Street Dane County

Roads that are intended to be included in the VDOT system of maintained roadways must meet the standards and specifications prescribed by the VDOT.

DESIGN MEMORANDUM WITH DESIGN EXCEPTIONS SP SP

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

FOR HISTORICAL REFERENCE ONLY

Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

SCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA

PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 306 DRAINAGE PIPE WORK DESCRIPTION 4

TRAFFIC CALMING TOOLBOX. For the residents of the City of Decatur, Georgia

Complete Streets for Louisiana

Monroe County Department of Transportation Vertical Curve Safety Study

Illini Union Champaign, IL. February 24, Paul Lorton, P.E. Safety Programs Unit Chief IDOT, Division of Highways, Bureau of Safety Engineering

Intersection Traffic Control Feasibility Study

Annual Progress Report from VDOT on the Effect of the Aging Population on State Agencies

PENNDOT HPMS DATA COLLECTION GUIDE. Bureau of Planning and Research Transportation Planning Division April 2016 (Updated March 2018)

City of Memphis On-Street Parking Modification Guidelines

CHAPTER 6H. TYPICAL APPLICATIONS

PENNDOT HPMS DATA COLLECTION GUIDE

Bicycling Routes on Provincial Roads Policy

RURAL HIGHWAY SHOULDERS THAT ACCOMMODATE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN USE (TxDOT Project ) June 7, Presented by: Karen Dixon, Ph.D., P.E.

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. NHS Arterial (Non-Interstate)

City of Madison, East Johnson Street North Baldwin Street to First Street Local Street Dane County

Residential Traffic Calming Handbook

Access Management Standards

Section 9A.07 Meaning of Standard, Guidance, Option, and Support

Section 3A.04 Colors. Section 3B.10 Approach Markings for Obstructions

DEFINITIONS Activity Area - Advance Warning Area Advance Warning Sign Spacing Advisory Speed Approach Sight Distance Attended Work Space

NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM. Policy and Procedure. Roswell Department of Transportation (770)

TOWN OF PORTLAND, CONNECTICUT COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Memorandum. Exhibit 60 SSDP To: Jenny Bailey, Senior Planner. From: Bill Schultheiss, P.E. (WA. P.E. #46108) Date: June 20, 2017

SCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA

October 2004 REVISIONS (2) SUPERELEVATION DEVELOPMENT 11.3(2)

MUTCD, 2003 Edition. FHWA, US DOT March R

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials

REVOCABLE PERMIT FOR STREET BANNER APPLICATION PACKAGE

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. Non-NHS State Highways

TRAFFIC STUDY. Birch Bluff Road / Pleasant Avenue 01/15/2018. City of Tonka Bay 4901 Manitou Road Tonka Bay, MN WSB PROJECT NO.

TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES Clarksville Street Department

TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES

TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR BICYCLE FACILITIES

APPENDIXB. Traffic Operations Technical Memorandum

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

City of Margate, Florida. Neighborhood Traffic Management Manual

Paul Huston, P.E., Design-Build Coordinator Chuck Gonderinger, HDR Engineering. Minnesota Department of Transportation (the Department)

Bicycle and Pedestrian Connectivity Study. Old Colony Planning Council

Prepared By: Town of Waxhaw Traffic Calming Policy

CE576: Highway Design and Traffic Safety

Levels, and Road Uses

Transcription:

5

Updated August 1, 2016 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials An Application from the State Highway or Transportation Department of Alabama for: Elimination of a U.S. (Interstate) Route Establishment of a U.S. (Interstate) Route Extension of a U.S. (Interstate)Route Relocation of a U.S. (Interstate) Route Establishment of a U.S. Alternate Route Establishment of a Temporary U.S. Route **Recognition of a Business Route on U.S. (Interstate) Route **Recognition of a By-Pass Route on U.S. Route I-22 Segment AASHTO Use Only Between I-65 in Birmingham, AL and Coalburg Road in Birmingham, AL The following states or states are involved: ALABAMA ** Recognition of A local vicinity map needed on page 3. On page 6 a short statement to the effect that there are no deficiencies on proposed routing, if true, will suffice. If there are deficiencies, they should be indicated in accordance with page 5 instructions. All applications requesting Interstate establishment or changes are subject to concurrence and approval by the FHWA DATE SUBMITTED: SUBMIT APPLICATION ELECTRONICALLY TO usroutes@aashto.org *Bike Routes: this form is not applicable for US Bicycle Route System

The purpose of the United States (U.S.) Numbered Highway System is to facilitate travel on the main interstate highways, over the shortest routes and the best available roads. A route should form continuity of available facilities through two or more states that accommodate the most important and heaviest motor traffic flow in the area. The routes comprising the National System of Interstate and Defense Highways will be marked with its own distinctive route marker shield and will have a numbering system that is separate and apart from the U.S. Numbered Highway System. For the convenience of the motorist, there must be continuity and a uniform pattern of marking and numbering these Interstate routes without regard to state lines. The U.S. Numbered System was established in 1926 and the Interstate Numbered System was established in 1956. Both have reached the period of review, revision, and consolidation. They now need perfecting rather than expansion. Therefore, any proposed alteration in the established systems should be extremely meritorious and thoroughly, though concisely, explained in order that the Special Committee on U.S. Route Numbering and the Standing Committee on Highways of the Association may give prompt and proper consideration to each and every request made by a member department. Explanation and Reasons for the Request: (Keep concise and pertinent.) To designate existing Future Interstate 22 as Interstate 22 from Birmingham, Alabama to Coalburg Road (Exit 93) in Birmingham, Alabama._ Date facility available to traffic June, 2016 Does the petition propose a new routing over a portion of an existing U.S. Route? No If so, where? Does the petition propose a new routing over a portion of an existing Interstate Route? Yes If so, where? Existing Future Interstate 22 from Interstate 65 in Birmingham, Alabama to Coalburg Road (Exit 93) in Birmingham, Alabama. 2

3

The State agrees and pledges its good faith that it will not erect, remove, or change any U.S. or Interstate Route Markers on any road without the authorization, consent, or approval of the Standing Committee on Highways of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, notwithstanding the fact that the changes proposed are entirely within this State. The weighted average daily traffic volume along the proposed route, as shown on the map on page 3, is 20,340 as compared to 17,090 for the year 2015 for all other U.S. Numbered Routes in the State. The Purpose and Policy in the Establishment and Development of the United States Numbered Highways, as Retained from October 3, 1991 or the Purpose and Policy in the Establishment of a Marking System of the Routes Comprising the National System of Interstate and Defense Highways as Retained from August 10, 1973 has been read and is accepted. In our opinion, this petition complies with the above applicable policy. (Signature) Chief Executive Officer (Member Department) This petition is authorized by official action of under date of as follows: (Copy excerpt from minutes.) All applications must be endorsed by the member department CEO. A letter from your Chief Executive Officer with the CEO s signature is sufficient when submitting your application, if you choose not to include the signature on this form. 4

0 Mileage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Control Points and Mileage 0.000 Pavement Type Pavement Condition Traffic ADT Pavement Width Percent Comparison to Applicable AASHTO Design Standards Shoulder Width Major Structures Roadway Width H - Loading Percent Percent Percent Vertical Sight Distance 0 10 20 30 40 20 40 60 80 10 20 30 40 20 40 60 80 20 40 60 80 Degree Length Percent 10 11 Show When In Excess of Standard Horizontal Curvature Percent Grade H E NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE N/A N/A 1 2 1 2.879 3 4 5 6 7 8 Attach additional sheet here if necessary 6

Contact Information: Mr. Robert J. Jilla Alabama Department of Transportation Bureau of Transportation Planning & Modal Programs (334) 242-6438 jillar@dot.state.al.us The following description will be provided to the AASHTO Highways Special Committee on U. S. Route Number (USRN). Where does the route begin? Where is it going? What type of facility is it traveling over? Explain the direction (north, east, south, and west) Name the focal point city or cities Total number of miles the route will cover Where does it end? Begin your description here in unformatted single spaced paragraph format: 1. Route begins at mile marker 96.480 and the junction of I-65 in Birmingham, AL. 2. From the junction of I-65 in Birmingham, AL., westerly to Coalburg Road (Exit 93) in Birmingham, AL. 3. Traveling over existing Future Interstate 22 4. West 5. Birmingham, AL. and Jasper, AL. 6. 2.879 miles 7. Route ends at mile marker 93.601 and the junction of Coalburg Road in Birmingham, AL. 7

Interstate Route 22 Mile Log Interstate Route Number State Type Intersection Point to Point Accumulated Remarks 22 Alabama Regular State Line 0 0 Joins US 78 22 Alabama Regular Hamilton 16.91 16.91 Crosses US 43 22 Alabama Regular Carbon Hill 34.92 51.83 Crosses Alt. US 78 22 Alabama Regular Graysville 33.41 85.24 Leaves US 78, Jct. Alt. 78 22 Alabama Regular Birmingham 11.24 96.48 Route Ends, Jct. I-65 8

INTERSTATE LOG ALABAMA STATE INTERSTATE ROUTE TOTAL MILES INTERSTATE MILES OVERLAP MILES ROUTE Alabama I-10 66.27 66.27 I-20 214.78 84.68 130.10 I-59 I-22 96.22 96.48 I-59 241.18 241.18 I-65 366.23 366.23 I-85 65.57 65.57 I-165 5.08 5.08 I-359 2.79 2.79 I-459 33.35 33.35 I-565 21.69 21.69 I-685 14.44 14.44 I-759 4.54 4.54 TOTALS 1132.14 1002.30 130.10 NOTES: 1. Interstate mileage in Alabama will increase 0.26 miles with the approval of I-22 Segment. 9