Assembly Committee Document 7.5

Similar documents
31/10/17. October 31, HIP Developments Inc. 700 Rupert Street Waterloo, ON N2V 2B5

Urban Design Terms of Reference. Pedestrian. Wind Comfort and Safety Studies. June 2014

1700 Webster Street Oakland, CA. Final Report. Pedestrian Wind Conditions Consultation Wind Tunnel Tests RWDI # July 16, 2015

SITE AND BUILDING INFORMATION. March 28, 2018

23/02/18. Pedestrian Wind Assessment Ladies Golf Club of Toronto Markham, Ontario Novus Project # February 23, 2018

Appendix 7. Wind and Comfort Impact Analysis

Pedestrian Wind Impact Study for Atlantic Yard Area & Redevelopment Project NEWMERICAL TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL.

SITE AND BUILDING INFORMATION

CITY OF SASKATOON COUNCIL POLICY

APPENDIX 11 WIND EFFECTS ASSESSMENT

Dear Mr. Nicolini: Qualitative Pedestrian Level Wind Assessment Montreal Road, Ottawa GWE File No.: DTPLW

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE Traffic Department MEMORANDUM

Wellington Street : Wind Impact Qualitative Assessment. To Whom It May Concern, RE: Proposed Wellington Street Wind Impact Qualitative Assessment

Wind Microclimate Assessment

CROSSING GUARD PLACEMENT CONSIDERATIONS AND GAP ASSESSMENT

Subject: Wind Impact Evaluation for the Facebook Campus Project, Menlo Park

2 Bowen Crescent Residential Development, Melbourne

Wind Resource Assessment for NOME (ANVIL MOUNTAIN), ALASKA Date last modified: 5/22/06 Compiled by: Cliff Dolchok

300 George Street, Brisbane Pedestrian Level Winds - Wind Tunnel Test

Wind Resource Assessment for DEADHORSE, ALASKA

Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations APPENDIX C TRANSIT STATION ACCESS PLANNING TOOL INSTRUCTIONS

Aspects of Using CFD for Wind Comfort Modeling Around Tall Buildings

City of Elizabeth City Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines

Dear Ms. Maw: Qualitative Pedestrian Level Wind Assessment St-Charles Market, 135 Barrette Street, Ottawa GWE File No.

TECHNIQUES FOR OFF AIRPORT OPERATIONS

Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies. Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004

ADA on Construction. Guidance for Section C Plan Preparers

Improve the livability of our streets by

4.0 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES

Accommodating Pedestrians in the Work Zone

Traffic Calming Policy

For Information Only. Pedestrian Collisions (2011 to 2015) Resolution. Presented: Monday, Apr 18, Report Date Tuesday, Apr 05, 2016

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. 350 Sparks Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Wind Resource Assessment for SAINT PAUL, ALASKA

West Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road

HEAT ILLNESS PREVENTION PROGRAM. Cal/OSHA Web Reference:

1.3 Pedestrian Environments

Chapter 3.6 Elementary School Z. Volusia County MPO. March Page 13.0

Plainfield Gateway. Plainfield Context

Fig$1.!Wind!Rose!Shearwater! ! August 7th, 2015

Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan for Public Right-of-Way Improvements

Update to DOTD Roundabout Design Policy

TRAFFIC SIGNALS OR ROUNDABOUT AT THIS UNUSUAL INTERSECTION?

Corporate. Report COUNCIL DATE: May 25, 1998 NO: R1500 REGULAR COUNCIL. TO: Mayor & Council DATE: April 27, 1998

National Bicycle and Pedestrian Documentation Project INSTRUCTIONS

Wind Resource Assessment for KING SALMON, ALASKA

City of Vestavia Hills Traffic Calming Policy for Residential Streets

June 3, Mr. Steven Grandmont, Chief Operating Officer Richcraft Group of Companies 2280 St. Laurent Boulevard Ottawa, Ontario K1G 4K1

Malvern Borough Local Traffic Calming

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

Arlington Public Schools Abingdon Elementary School Site Evaluation Preliminary Transportation Findings

S T A T I O N A R E A P L A N

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. 979 Wellington Street West. Ottawa, Ontario

Riverside Drive Complete Streets Project 3 rd Community Meeting. March 26, 2015

POLICY: TRAFFIC CALMING

FORM A PASCO COUNTY ACCESS CONNECTION PERMIT APPLICATION

Town of Clarkstown Traffic Calming Program. Table of Contents

Garden City State Street Corridor Existing Conditions October 2012

VIRGINIA SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION BOARD GUIDANCE DOCUMENT ON DAM BREAK INUNDATION ZONE AND INCREMENTAL DAMAGE ANALYSIS AND MAPPING PROCEDURES

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio

Omaha s Complete Streets Policy

Borough of Danville, PA Traffic Calming Program Guidelines

FLETCHER AVENUE PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLIST BEHAVIOR CHANGE FORMATIVE RESEARCH PROJECT

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. Greystone Village 10 Oblats Avenue. Ottawa, Ontario

PHASE 1 WIND STUDIES REPORT

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. 383 Slater Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Most Important Part of any Plan

ATTACHMENT 4 - TDM Checklist. TDM Checklist Overview

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK

Geometric Design Tables

Heat Illness Prevention

Local Winds & Microclimates. Unit 2- Module 1

Perceived Temperature & Thermal Danger Level Determine the atmospheric temperature. Adjust for wind chill. Adjust for altitude. Adjust for humidity.

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. 409 Brant Street. Burlington, Ontario

Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Toolbox (Excerpt from Figure 3.1)

BETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY

SECTION 7 INVENTORY OF SELECTED INTERSECTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER STUDY

4.11 TRANSPORTATION 4.11 TRANSPORTATION Environmental Setting Intersection, Roadway, and Freeway Evaluation Methodology

HENDERSON DEVELOPMENT 213, 217, 221, 221 ½, 223 HENDERSON AVENUE and 65 TEMPLETON STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW.

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. 83 East Street. Oakville, Ontario

TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY THE PROJECT INTRODUCTION SITE DESCRIPTION NOISE SENSITIVE RECEPTORS...

Community Meeting: Proposed Development 4520 Penn Ave. Notes January 30, :30-8:30pm

DOWNTOWN MIAMI PEDESTRIAN PRIORITY ZONE

DISTRIBUTION: Electronic Recipients List TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (17-01) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. MANUAL: Road Design English Manual

Wind Resource Assessment for FALSE PASS, ALASKA Site # 2399 Date last modified: 7/20/2005 Prepared by: Mia Devine

Three Springs Design Guidelines Fencing and Wall Standards

Donald Ballanti, Certified Consulting Meteorologist, Wind Impact Evaluation for the Menlo Park Facebook Campus Project, August 26, 2011.

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE

New Seward and 36 th Avenue Intersection Conceptual Design

County of Spartanburg South Carolina

PROPOSAL: Review of Alaska DOT&PF project 68471, Glacier Highway reconstruction and pedestrian improvements from

Latitude Altitude (Elevation) Proximity to large bodies of water Ocean Currents. larger. concentrated. direct. heating. heating.

1 st and 2 nd Street Couplet FAQ s

Route 7 Corridor Study

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. 398, 402, 406 Roosevelt Avenue. Ottawa, Ontario

Town of Bethlehem. Planning Assessment. Bethlehem Town Board

Pedestrian Level Wind Study Bank Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS), Mini Version

Opus Research Report D Wind Tunnel Study of the Proposed Site 10 Development, Wellington

Transcription:

Assembly Committee Document 7.5 Proposed Section 21.07.130C., Tall Buildings, amending and replacing the Tall Buildings section content as it appeared in Assembly Document 7.4.A. May 6, 2010 C. Tall Buildings This section addresses the effects of high rise buildings in Alaska s northern climate, including wind downdraft impacts on pedestrian comfort and safety, and sunlight shadowing impacts on the surrounding community. The requirements of this section apply to all high rise development. 1. Wind High rise buildings, including additions or modifications, shall be designed so that wind speeds on sidewalks, walkways and other pedestrian spaces surrounding the building will remain within thresholds for outdoor comfort and safety. a. Wind Speed Criteria Acceptable wind speed thresholds for outdoor comfort and safety shall be specified in the Title 21 users guide, and based on the types of pedestrian activity anticipated to occur around the proposed building. b. Method for Determining Wind Conditions A wind study by a wind engineering/aerodynamics expert shall be used to forecast wind conditions and present wind control measures or design modifications as necessary to demonstrate that wind speeds will remain within the accepted thresholds. 2. Sunlight Shadowing High rise buildings, including additions or modifications, shall be placed and designed to minimize shading of the following use types deemed sensitive to sunlight shadowing: residential uses and lots in a residential or RO district; elementary, middle and high schools in the PLI district; health care facilities in the PLI district; cemeteries; public parks; community gardens; botanical gardens; and commercial horticulture. a. Sunlight Access Criteria Acceptable thresholds of sunlight shadowing for the use types listed above shall be specified in the Title 21 users guide. b. Method for Determining Shadowing Impacts A shadow impact analysis study by a registered architect or landscape architect shall be used to forecast the spatial extent and hourly time periods of shadowing, and present design modifications as necessary to demonstrate that the sunlight shadowing will remain with accepted thresholds. 3. Exceptions The Director may allow wind speeds to exceed accepted thresholds for comfort, and/or allow shadowing beyond the accepted minimum thresholds for sunlight access, if: a. The building avoids worsening pre-existing conditions; b. The impact will be insubstantial because of the limited location or time period in which the wind speed or sunlight shadowing threshold is exceeded; or c. It has been demonstrated that the proposed development conforms to the maximum extent feasible. Page 1 of 4

Title 21 Users Guide: Wind Comfort and Safety Criteria (DRAFT) Comfort Wind criteria for pedestrian comfort and safety are typically based on wind force (speed). To capture the effects of both average winds and peak gust speeds in measuring pedestrian comfort, measurements of wind speed use the gust equivalent mean (GEM) wind speed. GEM is the hourly mean wind speed adjusted to incorporate the effects of gusts on pedestrians. GEM is calculated as the greater of either (a) the mean speed, or (b) the gust speed divided by a gust factor. Typically a gust factor of 1.85 is used for wind comfort measurement. Wind speed thresholds for comfort vary depending on the type of pedestrian activity. Lower wind speeds are needed in areas where people will sit, as compared with areas primarily for walking through. Table 1 provides GEM wind speed ranges considered tolerable for three categories of pedestrian activity: sitting, standing and walking. Sitting: Wind speeds of 6 mph or less are needed for outdoor cafes or other spaces where people will sit and relax or engage in other optional activities for long periods of time. At 0-6 mph, a light breeze may be felt, but a person can read a newspaper without it blowing away. Standing: Wind speeds of 9 mph or less are needed for people to comfortably stand for awhile, or sit at a bench for short periods, such as at a bus stop, or a bench along a sidewalk, or a primary entrance to a building. At wind speeds of 9 mph, leaves will rustle, however window shopping or lingering for limited periods should remain tolerable. Walking: Wind speeds of up to 12 mph can lift leaves, move litter, disturb hair and make loose clothing flap, but remain tolerable for walking on sidewalks, across intersections, or movement in playing fields or other spaces where people will be active. Uncomfortable: Wind speeds greater than 12 mph are considered as a nuisance or can be an impediment for walking and other activities. Dust and loose paper is raised, hair is disarranged. Probability of Exceedance. Because it is not reasonable to expect wind conditions in a location to be comfortable 100% of the time, the wind comfort criteria in Table 1 employ the widely accepted allowance for threshold wind speeds to be exceeded 20% of the time. For example, as long as wind speeds in a location remain in the range of 0 6 mph for 80% or more of the time, such location would be rated by Table 1 as comfortable for sitting. Table 1. Acceptable Wind Speed Thresholds by Pedestrian Comfort and Safety Category Sitting Standing Walking Uncomfortable Unsafe GEM wind speeds of 0 6 mph for 80% or more of the time GEM wind speeds of 0 9 mph for 80% or more of the time GEM wind speed of 0 12 mph for 80% or more of the time GEM wind speed exceeds 12 mph for more than 20% of the time Gust speeds of 55+ mph > two events annually Page 2 of 4

Wind Safety The last column of Table 1 addresses the wind safety category. Winds or wind gusts that are strong enough to blow people over are considered a safety hazard. Sources classify wind speeds above 45 mph as a strong gale, enough to blow people over depending on a variety of factors. Gust speeds in excess of 55 mph are whole gale speeds, and are likely to take a person off footing or balance. If such gust speeds exceed occur more than two times per year, then the chance of someone being injured becomes unacceptably high, according to the ASCE. Wind Chill The wind comfort threshold criteria measure only wind force. An evaluation of thermal effects would be more complex. For this reason, wind studies are not required to address the potential thermal effects on pedestrian comfort in the winter. However, on colder winter days, it is expected that wind chill will reduce people s tolerance of wind. Literature warns that any increase in winter winds can have a negative impact on outdoor activity. One source suggests that the relative wind comfort rating for any given location may shift by one comfort category to the right on Table 1 for each subtraction of 40 degrees from a starting temperature of 50 degrees Fahrenheit. Therefore, designers and review bodies are encouraged ensure that, in the winter especially, wind speeds will, to the maximum extent feasible, remain within the wind speed thresholds established in Table 1. Determining Local Wind Conditions Long-term wind statistics from the nearest airport (e.g., International Airport, Elmendorf), or another nearby first order weather station with reliable wind records, must be used to predict the frequency distribution of mean wind speeds for each wind direction. Because prevailing winds differ seasonally, statistics need to be separated into summer and winter seasonal data. The wind expert preparing a wind study may be able to estimate wind conditions around the proposed building by conducting simply a screening-level wind assessment. Unlike a full-blown wind tunnel test, a screening-level assessment is based on the wind consultant s knowledge and experience and/or software programs that estimate potential wind comfort conditions around a generalized building form. The screening-level wind assessment may be able to conclude that conditions around the building will remain within comfort and safety thresholds. However, if the assessment cannot clearly indicate wind speeds will remain within the comfort or safety criteria, or if it suggests that conceptual wind control measures or changes to the building shape may be needed, then the wind study should progress to a wind tunnel test using a scale model of the proposed building and all relevant surrounding structures and topography. The selection of wind speed sensor locations around the model building are chosen by the wind expert in consultation with the building design team and municipal staff, and should reflect the location of anticipated pedestrian activities (sitting, standing, and/or walking) near the building. Table 2 shows an acceptable presentation of a wind study s predictions for wind conditions. It provides comfort/safety ratings for each location around the building, in summer and winter. Location Season 1 2 Table 2. Wind Study Results (Hypothetical Example) Comfort Category Safety Category Sitting Standing Walking Uncomfortable Rating Events Rating Summer 70 80 90 10 Standing 0 Safe Winter 50 70 80 20 Walking 1 Safe Summer 75 85 90 10 Standing 2 Safe Winter 40 60 70 30 Uncomf. 4 Fail Page 3 of 4

Title 21 Users Guide: Acceptable Thresholds of Sunlight Shadowing by High Rise Buildings (DRAFT) This section of the Title 21 users guide provides thresholds for the minimum amount of sunlight access acceptable for specified uses considered especially sensitive to sunlight shadowing in Alaska s climate. These thresholds are intended to apply to the review of proposed high rise buildings. Because Alaska s low sun angles in the winter make it unreasonable to insist on sunlight access year-round, the sunlight access thresholds below focus on spring, summer and fall. During those seasons the sun s altitude is higher, allowing for buildings to be located nearer to one another in an urban setting without necessarily having to shade each other all day. Sunlight access becomes particularly important during spring and fall, when the angle of the sun can yield substantial solar radiation to buildings and outdoor spaces, making sunlight access a key factor determining in thermal comfort and usability. The acceptable extent of sunlight shadowing may vary depending on the affected location or use type. Table 3 below specifies minimum sunlight access considered acceptable for a variety of uses defined in Title 21. These minimum specifications apply to the entire property or developed area of the property being utilized by the use. Exceptions may be granted pursuant to the Title 21 provisions for high rises in AMC 21.07.130C.3. Table 3: Acceptable Sunlight Shadowing by Type of Affected Use Use or Location Minimum Sunlight Access Daylight Plane Angle Residential use or a lot in a Residential district except R-4 or R-4A Residential use or a lot in the R-4, R-4A or RO district Elementary, Middle or High School in the PLI district Health Care Facilities in the PLI district Cemeteries Public Parks Community Gardens Botanical Gardens Commercial Horticulture Eight hours on Mar / Sept 21. Six hours on Sept / Mar 21. 9 am to 3 pm (solar time) on Feb / Oct 21. Six hours on Sept / Mar 21. Six hours on Sept / Mar 21. Maximum of 1 foot of rise for every 2 feet of run Maximum of 3 feet of rise for every 5 feet of run Maximum of 1 feet of rise for every 2 feet of run Maximum of 3 feet of rise for every 5 feet of run n/a Page 4 of 4

11. Tall Buildings Shadow impact studies Wind effects Slender buildings (8-9 story condo) Step backs Sloping roofs 11

12. Wind Studies Transit waiting area Wind tunnel test for Augustine Energy Center (source: RWDI, retained by Neeser Construction) wind speed sensors (RWDI) Sunny and calm spaces 12