Kennesaw Mountain National Battlefield Park Mountain Road Alternatives

Similar documents
AGENDA REPORT. Issue: Discussion of potential improvements on Barnwell Road at Niblick Drive

Arlington s Master Transportation Plan

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

PUBLIC MEETING November 29, 2016 Malibu City Hall. PCH Parking Study

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Chapter 3 DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS

Complete Streets. Designing Streets for Everyone. Sarnia

Living Streets Policy

Michael Parmer, Management Aide, City Manager's Office

Appendix C. TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM TOOLBOX

General Design Factors

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Vision

and older adults and people with disabilities still face barriers when using the pedestrian network and public transportation.

West Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road

Access Management in the Vicinity of Intersections

SCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA

Memorandum. Sunday, July 13, Saturday, July 19, 2014

Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities & Transportation Division. Roadway Safety Initiative March 2011

Duwamish Way-finding and CTR Report

Memorandum. Exhibit 60 SSDP To: Jenny Bailey, Senior Planner. From: Bill Schultheiss, P.E. (WA. P.E. #46108) Date: June 20, 2017

TRAFFIC CALMING PLANNER S PORTFOLIO

Appendix T CCMP TRAIL TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DESIGN STANDARD

MEMORANDUM. Earl Haugen and UND Transportation and Traffic Coordination Committee

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

General References Definitions. (1) Design Guidance. (2) Supporting Information

BETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY

TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY & PROCEDURES

July 5, Arthur R. Ware, Jr. Elementary School 2017 Safe Routes to School Walkabout Report

PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 401 MOWING WORK DESCRIPTION 5

Double the amount of bicycle ridership while at the same time reducing the number of bicycle crashes by one-third.

City of San Diego Vision Zero Draft Strategic Plan FY 2017

PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 306 DRAINAGE PIPE WORK DESCRIPTION 4

PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 405 LIMB MANAGEMENT

Ottawa Beach Road Study

Basalt Creek Transportation Refinement Plan Recommendations

The Florida Bicycle and Pedestrian Partnership Council

Chapter 3.9 Timbercrest Elementary School. Volusia County MPO. November 2008

Implementing the Three Es of School Zone Traffic Calming

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

DISTRIBUTION: Electronic Recipients List TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (17-01) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. MANUAL: Road Design English Manual

For Information Only. Pedestrian Collisions (2011 to 2015) Resolution. Presented: Monday, Apr 18, Report Date Tuesday, Apr 05, 2016

Lee s Summit Road Improvement Study Public Open House June 7, 2007 Summary of Comment Card Responses

15 April CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPATE F o c us G r o up M o b ility

Community Transportation Plan

Module 5: Navigating Roadways

11/28/2016 VIA

SCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA

HARRISON STREET/OAKLAND AVENUE COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION PLAN

TRAFFIC ACTION PLAN. Laurie Meadows Neighborhood CITY OF SAN MATEO

Appendix 12 Parking on footways and verges

Who is Toole Design Group?

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

University of Victoria Campus Cycling Plan Terms of Reference. 1.0 Project Description

DRAFT. Scholls Ferry Road Conceptual Design Plan Technical Memorandum Multi-Modal Examples. Multnomah County 1600 SE 190th Avenue Portland, OR 97233

CTDOT Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Initiatives

Guidance. ATTACHMENT F: Draft Additional Pages for Bicycle Facility Design Toolkit Separated Bike Lanes: Two-Way to One-Way Transitions

Off-road Trails. Guidance

Non-Motorized Transportation 7-1

Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin

City of Turlock Traffic Calming Program

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Recommended Roadway Plan Section 2 - Land Development and Roadway Access

Alberta Highway 881. Corridor Management Plan. Session Forum 1 - Highways. Tri-Party Transportation Conference Moving Alberta Into the Future

El Paso County 2040 Major Transportation Corridors Plan

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

TRANSPORTATION TRAINING TOPICS. April 6, 2010

NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY

Table of Contents. I. Introduction 1. II. Elements of the School Crossing Program 1

Fields of St. Croix HOA Meeting. October 27, 2016

ORDINANCE NO

BIKE PLAN CONTENTS GATEWAY

VDOT I-66 Inside the Beltway Eastbound Widening Environmental Assessment. Staff Recommendations

12 RECOMMENDATIONS Road Improvements. Short Term (generally the next five years)

NORTH HIGHLAND LAKE ROAD PROJECT

Town of Mooresville, North Carolina Neighborhood Traffic Calming and Control Device Policy

River Road - Proposed Road Safety Enhancement Measures

CHAPTER 16 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION

DEFINITIONS Activity Area - Advance Warning Area Advance Warning Sign Spacing Advisory Speed Approach Sight Distance Attended Work Space

HIGHBURY AVENUE/HAMILTON ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE 1 MAY 14, 2015

NM-POLICY 1: Improve service levels, participation, and options for non-motorized transportation modes throughout the County.

Access Management Regulations and Standards

TOWN OF PAYSON TRAFFIC CALMING MANUAL

77th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. House Bill 2732 SUMMARY

RESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

City of Vestavia Hills Traffic Calming Policy for Residential Streets

4. TRAIL DESIGN GUIDELINES

Prepared By: Town of Waxhaw Traffic Calming Policy

CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES

Roads and Vehicular Traffic Design Principles. Roads and Vehicular Traffic Recommendations

City of Roseville Section 13 Design Standards. _Bikeways January 2016 SECTION 13 BIKEWAYS

Readington Road (C.R. 637) Construction

3.1 TRAFFIC CALMING PROCESS SUMMARY

Homework Module 7.01 Drivers Manual Study Questions

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE

Chapter VISION, MISSION, AND GOALS AND OBJECTIVES. Vision. Mission. Goals and Objectives CONNECTING COMMUNITIES ACROSS THE ST.

CITY OF ELKO BICYCLE AND PATHWAY PLAN

Town of Orangetown Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program

Gateway Signs. Description: Sign reminding drivers of the need to drive slowly Issues addressed: speeding Cautions/Limitations: Application:

City of Vallejo Traffic Calming Toolbox

Transcription:

Kennesaw Mountain National Battlefield Park Mountain Road Alternatives Management Issue Kennesaw Mountain National Battlefield Park was established by Congress in 1935 to preserve and commemorate the site of the Battle of Kennesaw Mountain during the Atlanta campaign of the Civil War. The mountain road within Kennesaw Mountain National Battlefield Park was constructed to provide vehicular access to the top of Kennesaw Mountain so park visitors can understand its key importance. The mountaintop provides a panoramic view of the region s important geographic features, revealing the strategy of Confederate and Union troop movements and battle lines during the Battle of Kennesaw Mountain. Access to the top of the mountain is considered critical to interpreting the park s significance. In recent years the steep, narrow, winding road has received increasing use by pedestrians and bicyclists. The road was not designed for multi-modal use, presenting inherent dangers when pedestrians and bicycles share the same road surface with motor vehicles. The steep grade, lack of road shoulders, and numerous blind curves compound the safety issues. An engineering study prepared in 2003 by the Federal Highway Administration identified major safety concerns with the mixed usage of the Kennesaw Mountain Road. This was echoed in a 2004 analysis by Federal transportation planners who found it imperative that safe alternatives for pedestrians and bicycles be developed. Many mountain road users recognize these dangers, and have shared their concerns with the park. NPS Management Policy Visitor Safety: The National Park Service strives to protect human life and provide for injury-free visits, with the saving of human life taking precedence over all other management actions. When threats to the safety and health of visitors are identified, the NPS will reduce or remove known hazards and apply other appropriate measures such as closures, guarding, signing, or other forms of education. The NPS preferred actions will be those that have the least impact on park resources and values and are consistent with the congressionally designated purpose of the park. Visitor Use: The NPS allows visitor activities that are appropriate to the purpose for which the park was established if they can be sustained without causing unacceptable impacts to park resources or values, and do not create an unsafe environment for other visitors or employees. Management controls must be imposed on all park uses to ensure that park resources and values are preserved and protected for future generations, to protect public health and safety, carry out scientific research, or minimize visitor use conflicts. These management actions can include: 1) closing a specific area, 2) prohibiting a particular use, or 3) otherwise placing limitations on the use. Management Alternatives The following alternatives for managing the mountain road within Kennesaw Mountain NBP represent ideas presented by professional highway engineers and transportation planners, park staff, park partners and stakeholders, and park visitors. The park seeks comments on these

alternatives from all of these sources, and will consider and evaluate these comments within the framework of the park s legislated purpose and NPS management policies. Any management solution must continue to allow vehicular access to the top of Kennesaw Mountain for interpretive purposes, and must provide for visitor safety. Note: Kennesaw Mountain has been identified as being significant for world bird conservation and has been officially designated as a globally important bird area. The park s bird population is the subject of continuing scientific research. Organized bird walks at Kennesaw Mountain National Battlefield Park are part of the park s scheduled interpretive programs. These interpretive walks, conducted by NPS volunteers during the spring and fall months, typically use the mountain road for this activity. The mountain road will be closed to vehicles, including bicycles, during these scheduled programs. The mountain road will also be closed to vehicles during bird research activities that are coordinated with and approved by the NPS. Alternative #1 Improve Foot Trail for Accessibility The foot trail from near the Visitor Center to the top of Kennesaw Mountain was developed to provide pedestrian access to the mountaintop. The existing trail is steep and rocky, with grades exceeding 22%, and is not handicap or stroller accessible. Under this alternative, sections of the foot trail will be rerouted and redesigned as needed to achieve a grade of less than 10%, widened to 6-8 ft. with a compacted or hardened surface that meets accessibility standards. Pedestrians The mountain road will be closed to pedestrian use and all foot traffic will be redirected to the foot trail. Vehicles The road will be open to private vehicles, including bicycles, Monday through Friday except designated holidays. A shuttle bus will operate on weekends and holidays, when the road will be closed to private vehicles and bicycles. Alternative #2 Expand Shuttle Service Under this alternative, the shuttle bus service will operate 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. daily year round. The shuttle will operate every 30 minutes Monday through Friday. Frequency may increase to every 20 minutes on weekends and holidays as needed to meet demand. The park has requested funding for a technical study to evaluate the best vehicle for this service in terms of size, technology, and method of acquisition, and will pursue those recommendations as appropriate and dependent upon available funds. The current shuttle fee is $2/adults and $1/children per day. The park is considering implementing an entrance fee. When that occurs the shuttle fee would be incorporated into the entrance fee and there would not be a separate fee to ride the shuttle bus. Pedestrians The road would be restriped and flexiposts installed to designate the outside 4 feet of road pavement to serve as a sidewalk. Pedestrian traffic would be required to stay within this designated walkway at all times, including weekends and holidays. Vehicles The road would be closed to private motor vehicles and a motorized gate installed at the road entrance to preclude illegal access. All visitors desiring to be transported to the top of the mountain by vehicle would be required to use the shuttle bus. The remaining 16 ft. of road

surface would be shared by park and emergency vehicles as necessary, requiring careful communication and coordination with the shuttle bus driver to avoid head-on collisions. The road would be open to bicycles from 5:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. daily (weekdays and weekends) during daylight savings time. Bicycles would share the remaining 16 ft. of road surface with park and emergency vehicles. Alternative #3 Schedule User Groups Under this alternative, the following schedule of access and closures will be in effect: Daily, 7:30-10:00 a.m. Mountain road closed to private vehicles including bicycles; open to pedestrians. Due to use of the road during this time by park and emergency vehicles, pedestrians will be required to abide by laws governing pedestrian use of roadways, i.e. walk on the road shoulder where it exists; walk to the far outside of the pavement where no road shoulder exists. Monday Friday, after 10:00 a.m. Mountain road closed to pedestrians. Road open to private vehicles including bicycles 10:00 a.m. 5:30 p.m. EST (7:30 p.m. EDT). Weekends & Holidays, 10:00 a.m. 6:00 p.m. EST (8:00 p.m. EDT) Mountain road closed to private vehicles including bicycles, open to pedestrians. Shuttle bus in operation 10:00 a.m. 5:00 p.m. EST (6:00 p.m. EDT). Due to use of the road during this time by the shuttle bus and park and emergency vehicles, pedestrians will be required to abide by laws governing pedestrian use of roadways, i.e. walk on the road shoulder where it exists; walk to the far outside of the pavement where no road shoulder exists. Alternative #4 Combine Elements of Alternatives #1-3 Under this alternative, the foot trail would be improved for accessibility. The road would be open to pedestrian use from 7:30-10:00 a.m. Due to the use of the road during this period by park and emergency vehicles, pedestrians will be required to abide by laws governing pedestrian use of roadways, i.e. walk on the road shoulder where it exists, and walk to the far outside of the pavement where no road shoulder exists. After 10:00 a.m. the road will be closed to pedestrians and all foot traffic redirected to the foot trail. The shuttle bus service would be expanded to operate 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. daily year round. The road would be closed to private vehicles, but would be open to bicycles daily from 10:00 a.m. 5:30 p.m. EST (7:30 p.m. EDT). Alternatives Considered but Dismissed: 1. Mark a pedestrian lane on the existing road surface. The existing road is already a substandard width, only 20 feet wide (10 feet per drive lane). A minimum sidewalk width is 4 feet. This would leave only 16 feet of road width for a 2- lane motor vehicle road (8 feet per drive lane), which does not meet minimum safety standards. 2. Construct a sidewalk adjoining the road. Approximately 80% of the 1.5 mile mountain road has less than 1 foot of shoulder, and the mountainside drops off steeply. Constructing an adjoining sidewalk would require building a

substantial retaining wall over a mile long, anchoring it into the mountain, and adding enormous volumes of fill material. NPS policy states: Before a decision is made to design, construct, expand, or upgrade access within a park, non-construction alternatives must be fully explored. If non-construction alternatives will not achieve satisfactory results, then a development solution may be pursued if the project: Is appropriate and necessary to meet park management needs; Is designed with extreme care and sensitivity to the landscape; Will not cause unacceptable adverse impacts to natural and cultural resources. 3. Reduce speed limit and allow continued mixed use. The road has been evaluated by traffic engineers and the existing 25 mph speed limit has been determined appropriate for the road conditions, except at specified curves. Speed limit advisory signs are appropriate for those locations. Most drivers go the speed at which they feel comfortable given the existing road conditions such as line of sight, encroaching vegetation, etc. Lowering the posted speed limit is not likely to affect the speed of a vast majority of drivers. It would be difficult to enforce and could encourage disregard for other posted regulations. 4. Install traffic calming devices and allow continued mixed use. Due to the 12% grade on the mountain road, traffic calming devices such as speed bumps would have a ramping effect that could make vehicles go airborne and lose control. On this road with its 12% grade these devices would create more safety problems than they would solve. 5. Increase enforcement efforts and allow continued mixed use. The park must patrol 11 miles of road, 20 miles of trail, and 22 miles of boundary with minimal staff. The park s existing staffing level does not allow the implementation of this alternative to the degree necessary to achieve even a moderate level of success. 6. Pave the road shoulder and allow continued mixed use. The mountain road has less than 1 foot of road shoulder along 80% of its 1.5 mile length. There is insufficient road shoulder to consider this alternative. Public Comment Period The park will receive written comments addressing the alternatives from March 27 through April 25, 2007. These comments can be dropped off at the park visitor center or mailed to the park at: Attn: Mountain Road Comments Kennesaw Mountain National Battlefield Park 900 Kennesaw Mountain Drive Kennesaw, GA 30152

Comments may also be emailed to the park at: Email address: KEMO_superintendent@nps.gov Subject line: Mountain Road Comments Visitors should include personal contact information with their comments (email address is preferable). Following the public comment period the park will evaluate and respond to all comments received. Similar comments will be grouped together for a single response. The park intends to complete all comment responses by August 31, 2007. University of Georgia Visitor Study The University of Georgia, Warnell School of Forestry, is conducting a visitor study to obtain additional social science data on the mountain road safety concerns. This study began in January 2007 and will continue through August 2007 in order to compile a more complete data set that includes those who visit the park seasonally or are from outside the area and unable to attend the public meetings. When the park receives the compiled results and conclusions from UGA, this data will be evaluated along with all public comments received. Selection of Preferred Alternative If the public comments and UGA visitor study indicate that the draft alternatives have adequately addressed the practical range of alternatives, we will identify a preferred alternative for implementation. If it becomes apparent that additional alternatives need to be considered or that the draft alternatives need further refinement, a revised set of alternatives will be developed and the public comment process repeated. Once a preferred alternative is selected, if it involves substantial cost or time to implement, short-range options will be identified that can provide a measure of improved safety until the final solution is implemented. Interim Measures During the intervening months prior to selection of a preferred alternative, the park will continue to allow mixed use of the mountain road by private vehicles, bicycles and pedestrians. The park will implement the following measures to help improve safety: Post additional signs instructing pedestrians to stay left going uphill and stay right going downhill. Post speed limit advisory signs at specified curves. Place radar activated speed display device when available from County. Increase patrol and enforcement as staffing permits, focused during heavier use times, to educate mountain road users of the laws: i.e. bicyclists and motorists must comply with the posted speed limit; pedestrians are required to walk on the road shoulder where it exists and to the far edge of the pavement where there is no road shoulder. Bicyclists determined to be exceeding the speed limit will be issued a citation for a mandatory appearance in Federal court, and their bicycle seized as evidence until the court date. Pedestrians unable to comply with the law (ex. groups not intending to walk single file, those with pets and strollers) will be redirected to the foot trail or multi-use trail.