The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN.

Similar documents
GLOBAL RE-INTRODUCTION PERSPECTIVES

GLOBAL RE-INTRODUCTION PERSPECTIVES

Global Re-introduction Perspectives: 2010

Western gorilla re-introduction to the Batéké Plateau region of Congo and Gabon

Global Re-introduction Perspectives: 2010

Wildlife Middle East News VOLUME 2 ISSUE 4 MARCH 2008 ISSN WHERE ARE WE IN TERMS OF ARABIAN ORYX CONSERVATION?

Biodiversity Conservation at Al Ain Zoo

Taxonomy and Conservation

Biodiversity and Conservation Biology

Status Report on the Yellowstone Bison Population, August 2016 Chris Geremia 1, Rick Wallen, and P.J. White August 17, 2016

Relation between coral reef degradation and the Overexploitation of coral reef fishes in El-Tur region, Egyptian Red Sea Coast

The European rabbit: Past, Present and Future of the species in the Iberian Peninsula

Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Long history in ecology

Stakeholder Activity

Recommendations for Pennsylvania's Deer Management Program and The 2010 Deer Hunting Season

CITES Secretariat Saker Falcons in trade: a case study

BACKGROUND, HYPOTHESES, PREDICTIONS

MODULE 2. Conservation needs of cheetah and wild dogs and related threats to their survival. Notes:

Memorandum of Understanding on the Conservation of Migratory Birds of Prey in Africa and Eurasia

Caspian Environment Programme Steering Committee meeting Almaty, September

The Arabian Leopard Panthera pardus nimr conservation breeding programme

Hartmann s Mountain Zebra Updated: May 2, 2018

Into the Al Hajar with the Arabian Tahr 2012 FIELD REPORT

NATIONAL REPORT FORMAT FOR THE SAIGA ANTELOPE MOU AND ACTION PLAN

Marker, L. (2005). Aspects of ecology, biology and conservation strategies of Namibian farmland cheetahs. Animal Keeper's Forum 7/8.

Other Relevant International Standards OIE Global Conference on Rabies Control 7-9 September 2011, Incheon, Korea

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUMMARY OF COUGAR POPULATION MODEL AND EFFECTS OF LETHAL CONTROL

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Deer Management Unit 252

Exotic Wildlife Association Membership Alert

IUCN Guidelines for the Placement of Confiscated Animals

Presentation Eunice Robai. The Endangered Species

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Feasibility Study on the Reintroduction of Gray Wolves to the Olympic Peninsula

Dauphin Lake Fishery. Status of Walleye Stocks and Conservation Measures

Deer Management Unit 152

CHECKS AND BALANCES. OVERVIEW Students become managers of a herd of animals in a paper-pencil, discussionbased

Veronica Yovovich, Ph.D. Wildlife Conflict Specialist and Science Program Director Mountain Lion Foundation

Roger Williams Park Zoo Rhode Island Zoological Society. Committed to Conservation Education / Research

Original language: English CoP17 Doc CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA

[Docket No. FWS R2 ES ; FXES FF02ENEH00] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Mexican Wolf Draft Recovery

Management History of the Edwards Plateau

Copyright 2018 by Jamie L. Sandberg

Republic of Malawi. Country Profile. Giraffe Conservation Status Report. Sub- region: Southern Africa

021 Deer Management Unit

Impact of Climate Change on Bees in the Eastern Forest: Diversity and Adaptations of Organisms

Sustainable use of wildlife in the context of the GIZ Regional Programme in Central Asia

April Nisga a Fisheries & Wildlife Department

Minnesota Deer Population Goals

Environmental Change and its Effects

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Mule and Black-tailed Deer

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion

9-1 What Role Do Humans Play in the Premature Extinction of Species?

MANAGEMENT ESTABLISHING JURISDICTION LEGAL BASIS DEFINING LOGICAL APPROACHES

Biologist s Answer: What are your goals? Deer Management. Define goals, objectives. Manager s Question: Should I cull or shoot spikes?

Blue cod 5 (BCO5) pot mesh size review

Causes of Tiger (Panthera tigris) Population Decline, and Potential Consequences if the Decline Continues

Major threats, status. Major threats, status. Major threats, status. Major threats, status

Faster, better, cheaper: Transgenic Salmon. How the Endangered Species Act applies to genetically

Overview Life history Distribution Management

Official Journal of the European Union L 248/17

Short briefing Abjatta shall Lakes national parks

Giraffe population has plunged, now "threatened with extinction"

IUCN Guidelines for THOPHY HUNTING to promote conservation. Sandro Lovari

Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations

RETURN OF THE SCIMITAR- HORNED ORYX TO CHAD. John Newby Sahara Conservation Fund

BRIEFING on IBERIAN LYNX (Lynx pardinus) MANAGEMENT PLAN AT DOÑANA NATIONAL PARK

COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 79/409/EC. of 2 April on the conservation of the wild birds

Section 3: The Future of Biodiversity

Shelly Cotterman Nashville Zoo

New Mexico Supercomputing Challenge

THE WOLF WATCHERS. Endangered gray wolves return to the American West

Reduction in Biological Diversity Section 4.1 p Section 4.3 p

Controlled Take (Special Status Game Mammal Chapter)

Snow leopard (Panthera uncia) Conservation WWF-India Initiative. Aishwarya Maheshwari Species Conservation Programme WWF-India

Cawston Game Ranch. Zimbabwe. Facts and Figures. Data compiled by Vernon R Booth On behalf of Peter Johnstone and Juliet Johnstone

Colorado West Slope Mule Deer Strategy Public Engagement Report

DMU 065 Ogemaw County Deer Management Unit

Early History, Prehistory

Wildlife Management. Wildlife Management. Geography 657

Frequently Asked Questions Reintroduction of Bison to Banff National Park

Tennessee Black Bear Public Opinion Survey

Current Status and Management Recommendations for the Fishery in the Cloverleaf Chain of Lakes

Threats to Biodiversity/Sustainability

Graphing population size daily Review Deer: Predation or Starvation

NASCO Guidelines for the Management of Salmon Fisheries

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Endangered Species Act of 1973

Governor Bill Richardson Orders Temporary Trapping Ban to Protect the Mexican Gray Wolf

Regents Biology LAB. NATURAL CONTROLS OF POPULATIONS

Minnesota Deer Population Goals. East Central Uplands Goal Block

a) Case Study: North American Bison/Wood Buffalo b) Species Diversity/Richness

BROWN BEAR MANAGEMENT IN SLOVENIA. Marko JONOZOVIČ, B.Sc. Slovenia Forest Service Head of Wildlife & Hunting Department

1 st Meeting of Range States for the Joint CMS CITES African Carnivore Initiative (ACI1)

Draft Wild Horse Management Plan

Policy Position Statement on Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) and hybrids in Ireland and Northern Ireland

Biology B / Sanderson!

SP-472 AUGUST Feral Hog Population Growth, Density and Harvest in Texas

REINTRODUCTION OF PILEATED GIBBONS (Hylobates pileatus) TO THE ANGKOR PROTECTED FOREST, SIEM REAP, CAMBODIA

Sudan Status of Desert Antelopes by. Introduction

ACTIVITY FIVE SPECIES AT RISK LEARNING OBJECTIVES: MATERIALS: Subjects: Science, math, art, history

Transcription:

The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or any of the funding organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN. Published by: IUCN/SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group & Environment Agency-ABU DHABI Copyright: 2011 International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Citation: Soorae, P. S. (ed.) (2011). Global Re-introduction Perspectives: 2011. More case studies from around the globe. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN/SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group and Abu Dhabi, UAE: Environment Agency-Abu Dhabi. xiv + 250 pp. ISBN: 978-2-8317-1432-5 Cover photo: Clockwise starting from top-left: i. Mountain yellow-legged frog Adam Backlin ii. American alligator Ruth Elsey iii. Dwarf eelgrass Laura Govers, RU Nijmegen iv. Mangrove finch Michael Dvorak BirdLife Austria v. Berg-Breede whitefish N. Dean Impson vi. Zanzibar red colobus monkey Tom Butynski & Yvonne de Jong Cover design & layout by: Pritpal S. Soorae, IUCN/SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group Produced by: IUCN/SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group & Environment Agency-ABU DHABI Download at: www.iucnsscrsg.org iii

Twenty years of conservation and monitoring of reintroduced mountain gazelle in the Ibex Reserve, Saudi Arabia Torsten Wronski 1,2, Mohamed A. Sandouka 1,2 & Thomas M. Butynski 1,2 1 - King Khalid Wildlife Research Centre, Saudi Wildlife Authority, Thumamah, PO Box 61681, Riyadh 11575, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 2 - Zoological Society of London, Conservation Programs, Regents Park, London NW1 4RY, UK t_wronski@gmx.de, mohd-sand@hotmail.com & tbutynski@aol.com Introduction Historically, the mountain gazelle (Gazella gazella) occurred across most of the Arabian Peninsula into northern Syria and Turkey. Early explorers and scientists reported that the mountain gazelle is closely associated with Acacia spp. trees. The current range includes southern Turkey, Jordan, Israel, Iran (Farur Island), Oman, United Arab Emirates, Yemen and Saudi Arabia. The IUCN Red List currently ranks this species as Vulnerable (A2ad). Mountain gazelle numbers have decreased dramatically throughout their range, particularly in Saudi Arabia. The only protected areas in Saudi Arabia with natural populations of mountain gazelle are Al Khunfah, Harrat al Harrah, and Farasan Islands. A few scattered populations occur outside of protected areas in the western Asir Mountains, Hejaz Mountains, and possibly on the Tihama coastal plain. There are only two reports of mountain gazelle occurring historically in the central mountains of Saudi Arabia. Both reports are for mountain gazelle in the Jebel Tuwaiq, which is where the Ibex Reserve is situated. In an effort to re-establish the locally extinct population in the Tuwaiq Mountains (Ibex Reserve), the Saudi Wildlife Authority (SWA) initiated a mountain gazelle re-introduction program in 1990 (Dunham et al., 1993). The released gazelles came from the King Khalid Wildlife Research Centre (KKWRC), Saudi Arabia. Goals Goal 1: Re-establish a mountain gazelle population in the Tuwaiq Mountains, central Saudi Arabia. Goal 2: Improve captive breeding at KKWRC so as to produce individuals capable of surviving in the wild. Mountain gazelle, 20 years after first release into Wadi Ghabah, Ibex Reserve. T. Wronski 175

Goal 3: Establish a post-release monitoring program that would provide the information necessary (e.g. habitat choice, food preferences, dispersal distances, mortality rates) for identifying other suitable sites for re-introduction in Saudi Arabia. Goal 4: Establish an indirect, non-invasive, method, based on the use and distribution of fecal pellet latrines, to estimate population size and distribution at other sites. Success indicators Indicator 1: A healthy and genetically diverse mountain gazelle breeding population is maintained at KKWRC. Indicator 2: A healthy and self-sustaining mountain gazelle population is established in the Ibex Reserve. Indicator 3: The progeny of released mountain gazelles disperse and settle outside the Ibex Reserve. Indicator 4: A significant reduction of illegal hunting in the Ibex Reserve. Indicator 5: Acceptance of, and support for, the Ibex Reserve increases in the local community. Project Summary Feasibility: The Ibex Reserve (1870 km²; 23 30 N, 46 30 E) near Hawtat Bani Tamim in Jebel Tuwaiq, central Saudi Arabia, was established in 1988 by SWA. A primary objective was to protect the last Nubian ibex (Capra nubiana) in the Jebal Tuaiq. The Reserve is comprised of an undulating, stony, limestone plateau (800-1,100 m a.s.l.) incised by deep wadis. Plant standing crop biomass is extremely low on the plateau, but higher in the wadis, where Acacia tortilis dominates the vegetation. No historic information is available on the taxonomic status, distribution, or numbers of mountain gazelle in Jebel Tuwaiq. A study (Al-Shaya et al., 2007) of the local peoples knowledge of, and attitude towards, the Ibex Reserve revealed a low level of awareness regarding the plants and animals of the Reserve or the importance of wildlife. Their attitude towards the Reserve is hostile. The main reason given for this is the lack of conservation education and public awareness programs. The local people understand that the Ibex Reserve is a protected area, but realize that law enforcement is weak. They believe that improved law enforcement and draconian penalties are the only way to stop illegal hunting. Implementation: Mountain gazelle for this re-introduction were obtained from captive stock at KKWRC. The Centre was established in 1987 by SWA (under the management of the Zoological Society of London) to develop the private collection of the late King Khalid Ibn Abdul Aziz Al Saud. Several subspecies of mountain gazelles are recognized. The population at KKWC is a mix of subspecies originating from various sites on the Arabian Peninsula. Prior to their release, all gazelles were vaccinated against rinderpest, rabies, pasteurellosis, brucellosis, haemorragic septicaemia, foot and mouth, clostridiosis, and PPR. They were transported one gazelle to a crate (100 cm x 36 cm x 90 cm) during winter or spring in order to avoid heat stress. A dose of long acting Narcoleptic was administered before transportation to keep the gazelles calm. The gazelles 176

were held at the Ibex Reserve in pre-release pens for 4 weeks to develop site fidelity and to adapt to the natural vegetation as a source of food. Gazelles were released into four wadis (Wadi Ghabah, Wadi Gafar, Wadi Jidr, and Wadi Nukhailan) and on the plateau of the Ibex Reserve. The entrance to all wadis was fenced in order to limit access by Acacia-dominated mountain gazelle habitat people and their livestock. with plateau free of vegetation M. Klein In total, 11 releases were made from 1990 to 2007. During the first release 19 gazelles were put into Wadi Ghabah. This was followed by the release of 10 gazelles in 1991 into Wadi Ghabah, and by the release of 25 gazelles in 1992 into Wadi Gafar. Radio-collars were fitted to 28 gazelles and all were given plastic ear-tags for individual recognition. During 1993-1995, 30 gazelles were released into Wadi Jidr but no post-release monitoring was carried out. The last release was in 2007 when 21 gazelles were put into Wadi Nukhailan and seven on the plateau. Radio-collar was fitted to 14 gazelles and all were given plastic collars of different colors. Details on numbers, locations and sex/age composition of mountain gazelle released into Ibex Reserve are provided in Dunham (1997) and Wronski et al. (in press). Post-release monitoring: Marked gazelles were intensively monitored in order to determine survival, dispersal patterns, and home ranges. There were about 185 mountain gazelles in the Wadi Mutim System (Wadi Ghabah and Wadi Gafar) in 1995. The mean annual exponential rate of increase was 0.275; effectively doubling the population every 2.5 years (Dunham, 1997). From 1995 to 1998, gazelle numbers dropped dramatically to about 70 individuals (Dunham, 2001). This decline was attributed to the adverse effects of domestic livestock entering the wadis, to poaching, and to poor relations between the local people and the SWA. No systematic surveys were undertaken during 1998-2000. In 2001, KKWRC and SWA re-established a standardized monitoring scheme. Due to increasing human pressure (particularly recreation, poaching, and livestock grazing), the number of gazelles declined further to 10-40 individuals in 2007 (Wronski et al., in press). Since 2007, the population in the Wadi Mutim System has been relatively stable at 10-20 gazelles. In contrast to the situation in Wadi Mutim, no population increase occurred after the releases in Wadi Nukhailan. The number of 177

collared gazelles declined rapidly from 14 in February 2007 to one in November 2008. Counts in 2011 indicate that the number of gazelles has stabilized at about 30-40 animals. In 2010, a group of mountain gazelle was discovered in Wadi al- Fariah, in the southeastern-most part of the Reserve, 27.5 km from the nearest release site. While this demonstrates successful dispersal, it also suggests limited resource availability and a high level of disturbance by people in the release areas (Wronski, 2010). Nonetheless, the presence of gazelles at Wadi al-fariah, and at other sites outside of the original release areas, gives reason to hope for the long-term persistence of this re-introduced population. Major difficulties faced No effective control of people or their livestock. The range is over-grazed and over-browsed, leaving insufficient food for gazelles. Poaching is a major problem. Population increase above carrying capacity or territorial exclusion of youngadult males led to dispersal outside the protected area making the gazelles prone to harassment and poaching. Poor relationships between local people and the SWA means low acceptance of the Ibex Reserve and retaliation in the form of poaching of gazelles. The Reserve is on the edge of the historic geographical range of mountain gazelle. As such, the Reserve provides marginal habitat for this species, including low availability of food (Wronski, 2010). Major lessons learned A positive attitude towards, and acceptance of, the Ibex Reserve by the local people appears to be imperative for the success of this re-introduction. The long term success of this re-introduction remains dependent on public support and conservation/environmental awareness in Saudi society, with sustained environmental education programs in schools a vital element. Marginal habitat and low food availability, together with substantial competition with Nubian ibex and domestic livestock (camel, donkey, sheep, goat) has led to a low but stable population of mountain gazelle in the Ibex Reserve. The social organization of mountain gazelle (i.e., female philopatry, male territoriality, dispersal patterns) must be considered when releasing animals into the Reserve. Mountain gazelle are tenacious and able to cope without drinking water. They are capable of maintaining a low population density in the Ibex Reserve under present levels of poaching and predation by Arabian wolf (Canis lupus). 178

Success of project Highly Successful Successful Partially Successful Failure Reason(s) for success/failure Mountain gazelle of good genetic background were available for reintroduction. Suitable habitat for the mountain gazelle, albeit marginal, was available at several sites in a large protected area. Long distance dispersal of mountain gazelles from release sites led to establishment of groups at new, widely located, sites. Adequate financial support and expertise for the re-introduction, monitoring, research, and some law enforcement was available. References Al-Shayaa, M. S., El Hag, A. E. & Muneer, S. E. 2007. The role of people s knowledge and attitudes in conservation of wildlife in the natural reservations: A case study of the Ibex Reservation in AL-Riyadh Region, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 14(1): 123-135. Dunham, K. M. 1997. Population growth of mountain gazelles Gazella gazella, reintroduced to central Arabia. Biological Conservation 81: 205-214. Dunham, K. M. 2000. Dispersal pattern of mountain gazelles Gazella gazella released in central Saudi Arabia. Journal of Arid Environments 44: 247-258. Wronski, T. 2010. Population density and home range size of re-introduced mountain gazelles (Gazella gazella) in relation to resource availability in the Ibex Reserve, central Saudi Arabia. Journal of Arid Environments 74: 1427-1434 Wronski, T., Alageel, K., Plath, M. & Sandouka, M. A. in press. Twenty years of monitoring a re-introduced population of mountain gazelles (Gazella gazella) in the Ibex Reserve, Saudi Arabia. Zoology in the Middle East. 179