Safety Division Monthly Key Performance Indicators for the Reporting Period of January 2013

Similar documents
APPENDIX C. Systems Performance Report C-1

Instances of 1 Minute or Less Between Buses 4 5% 55% 3.9% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 2.9% 2.8% Sep- Sep 07 Oct-07 Nov-07 Dec-07 Jan- Jan 08 Feb- Feb 08 Mar-08

Where We Live and Work Today

MEMORANDUM. City Constituents. Leilani Schwarcz, Vision Zero Surveillance Epidemiologist, SFDPH

CHAPTER 9: SAFETY 9.1 TRAFFIC SAFETY INTERSECTION COLLISIONS

Performance Measures Year End 2018

Monthly Safety and Security Report March 2018

City of San Diego Vision Zero Draft Strategic Plan FY 2017

Accident Precursor Monitoring in Metro Railways

Table of Contents. Feature Article. Prevention of Traffic Accidents involving Elderly People

Performance Measures Year End 2015

Vision Zero Task Force February 28, Collision Landscape Analysis

VIRGINIA RAILWAY EXPRESS

Mission Bay Loop (MBL) Public Meeting

COLLISION STATISTICS May Engineering Services Box 5008, th Avenue Red Deer, AB T4N 3T4

APPENDIX F. Safety Planning. October 2018

Board-Approved Funding Awards for Cycle 4 Active Transportation Grant Program Projects (in Order of Project Rankings) Approved on

Metro. This report updates the board on specific strategies under consideration for implementation by FY2006 to reduce bus accidents.

North Coast Corridor:

Road safety training for professional drivers: worldwide practices

INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Metrolink Ridership and Revenue Quarterly Report. Staff Report

Auckland Transport Monthly Indicators Report 2018/19

MUTCD Part 6: Temporary Traffic Control

Mission: The mission of FARS is to make vehicle crash information accessible and useful so that traffic safety can be improved

304B Gordon- TTU Lubbock, TX April 6 th, 2011 Mr. Tyler Patton Office of the President 4952 Matador Avenue Lubbock, TX Dear Tyler Patton:

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

FEASIBILITY REPORT ON RED LIGHT CAMERAS PLACED AT CENTRAL AVENUE AND H STREET.

Keep Customers and Ourselves Safe. Mark Shelton, District Engineer. Tracker. Measures of Departmental Performance

City of Prince Albert Statement of POLICY and PROCEDURE. Department: Public Works Policy No. 66. Section: Transportation Issued: July 14, 2014

Looking Ahead and Looking Back: An Examination of NJDOT s and NJT s 2014 Capital Program

MEMORANDUM. Background

F L E T C H E R A V E N U E

MTS anned Underwater Vehicles Committee

ITARDA INFORMATION. No.128. Special feature

Governor s Transportation Vision Panel

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD Public Meeting of September 24, 2014 (Information subject to editing)

TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL GUIDELINES FOR HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSINGS

Paratransit Service. ADA Paratransit Service

A review of 2015 fatal collision statistics as of 31 December 2015

Madras College Site Traffic Management Plan (Kilrymont Road)

Appendix E: Bike Crash Analysis ( )

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Pedestrian Safety Campaign

VISION ZERO: ELIMINATING TRAFFIC DEATHS BY 2024 MARCH 2015

Pedestrian-Bicycle Emphasis Area Breakout Session. Highway Safety Summit April 26, 2016

SUBJECT: Board Approval: 4/29/04

Designing Safety into Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Projects

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Road Safety Partnership Handbook

The 2002 Pedestrian Safety Awareness Campaign

School Traffic Management Plan

Madras College Site Traffic Management Plan (South Street) August 2015 Reviewed / Updated August 2016, August 2017 (Next review due August 2018)

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

Double the amount of bicycle ridership while at the same time reducing the number of bicycle crashes by one-third.

Improving intersections for people that walk in Minneapolis

WEST AND SOUTH WEST RING ROAD DOWNSTREAM TRAFFIC IMPACTS

New Strategic Road Safety Plan Risk assessment as alternative for (lack of) accident data?

Public Works Committee Meeting Richard E. Mastrangelo Council Chamber November 20, 2017

Circulation in Elk Grove includes: Motor vehicles, including cars and trucks

Goal 3: Foster an environment of partnerships and collaboration to connect our communities and regions to one another.

Members of the Board of Directors. Wendy Knowles, Clerk of the Board. Metrolink Ridership and Revenue Annual Report

Pedestrian Safety HANDBOOK

2012 APTA Bus Safety Award

A Complete Streets Policy for Saratoga Springs. Presented By: Shared Access Saratoga

WELCOME Mission-Geneva Transportation Study

Deaths/injuries in motor vehicle crashes per million hours spent travelling, July 2007 June 2011 (All ages) Mode of travel

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

COST ESTIMATION. Fully Allocated Causal Factor Models Temporal Variation Models Incremental Fixed Variable Cost Models

ACTIA Programs Annual Compliance Report Reporting Year Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Table 1: Summary of Expenditures and Accomplishments

Accident Investigation and Hazard Analysis

Keep Customers and Ourselves Safe. Mark Shelton, District Engineer. Tracker. Measures of Departmental Performance

Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations APPENDIX C TRANSIT STATION ACCESS PLANNING TOOL INSTRUCTIONS

Vision to Action Community Coalition February 14, 2014 Briefing

Auckland Transport Monthly Indicators Report 2018/19

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Evaluating Grade Crossing Safety. Christopher C. Pflaum, Ph.D. Spectrum Economics, Inc. Overland Park, KS (913)

2016 FACT SHEET ENGINEERING STREET OPERATIONS. Engineering Street Operations net 2016 budget is $5,199,900 WHAT IS ENGINEERING STREET OPERATIONS?

Kentucky s Surface Transportation System

Characteristics of Traffic Accidents in Highway Work Zones

Work Zone Safety in Oregon

ACTIA Programs Annual Compliance Report Reporting Year Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Table 1: Summary of Expenditures and Accomplishments

Review of Fatal Collisions

Mr. Joseph J. Lhota Chairman Metropolitan Transportation Authority 2 Broadway New York, NY Re: Train On-Time Performance Report 2017-F-8

Attachment 1. State of. the

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

Public Transportation and Bicycle & Pedestrian Stakeholder Webinar. April 11, :30 PM

STAFF REPORT SAUSALITO CITY COUNCIL

A Survey of Planning, Design, and Education for Bikeways and Bus Routes on Urban Streets

Prevention Of Accidents Caused By Rotating Transit Bus Wheels By James M. Green, P.E., DEE

Understanding Rail and Bus Ridership

SOLANA BEACH BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION PLAN SECOND ADDENDUM

Defensive Driving Answers, Resha Oylear September 2013

Hazards Associated with High-Speed Rail (HSR) Operation Adjacent to Conventional Tracks

Grand Haven Charter Township. Facts and Trends Affecting Grand Haven Charter Township January 2017

Bicycle Network. Vision Zero San Francisco The City and County of San

Addendum 4 Levels of Response

Topics To Be Covered. Summarize Tier 2 Council Direction Discuss Mill and Ash Alternatives Next Steps

Town of Orangetown Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program

Transcription:

ATTACHMENT 1A Safety Division Monthly Key Performance Indicators for the Reporting Period of January 13 NCTD provides a monthly Safety Report to the Board of Directors which tracks key indicators related to safety. NCTD has added a new key performance indicator (KPI) for 1 that tracks workers compensation claims by transit mode. The following Key Performance Indicators are included in this and will be included in future monthly reports. Preventable and Non-preventable Accidents Rail Incidents Rail Near Misses Unusual Occurrences National Transit Database Workers Compensation Claims new item under development System Safety Review Committee Top Initiatives Tracking This report is intended to serve as a report card for NCTD safety, providing a high-level look at KPIs that are monitored through trending and comparison. KPIs showing unusual trends are further examined to identify the causes to changes in trends.

Preventable and Non-Preventable Accidents A preventable accident is one in which the driver or train operator could have done something to prevent or avoid the accident regardless of fault. In the case of bus operations, if the accident could have been avoided at all by the bus operator, even if the investigation places fault on the other driver, it is considered a preventable accident. A non-preventable accident is one that could not have been avoided no matter what actions were taken. Preventable and non-preventable accidents have been separated into two bar charts. The charts show a monthly comparison of non-preventable and preventable accidents on all NCTD transit modes for January 1 compared to January 13. In January 13 there were preventable accidents both on BREEZE and on all other modes. In January 1 there were 5 preventable accidents on BREEZE and reported preventable accidents on all other modes. Preventable Accidents January 13 and 1 6 5 3 13 January 1 BREEZE SPRINTER COASTER LIFT

In January 13 there were reported non-preventable accidents, all on the BREEZE, with on all other modes. For January 1 there were non-preventable accidents reported for BREEZE, with on all transit modes. Non-Preventable Accidents January 13 & 1 5 3 13 January 1 BREEZE SPRINTER COASTER LIFT

Rail Incidents Rail incidents resulting in injury or death to an individual or damage to equipment or the railroad arising from the carrier s operations are required to be submitted monthly to the Federal Railroad Administration. While NCTD only reports SPRINTER and COASTER incidents to the FRA, this chart includes all carriers involved in incidents on NCTD-owned track to provide a picture of how many incidents are occurring on the NCTD right-of-way. This chart compares 1, 13 and 1 rail incidents across both subdivisions. In 1 there was only 1 COASTER incident recorded for the month. In January 13, there was 1 incident involving a BNSF train. In 1, there were Amtrak incidents for the month of January. Escondido and San Diego Subdivision Incident Tracking, Calendar Years 1, 13 and 1 3 1 Amtrak BNSF COASTER SPRINTER 1 13 1

Rail Near-Miss Report A near-miss is reported by a rail operator or engineer when a vehicle, pedestrian, or bicyclist is located too close to and sometimes on the tracks, at times requiring the train operator to brake or apply the emergency brake; then proceed when clear. While NCTD has been tracking nearmisses on the Escondido Subdivision for several years, NCTD made it a goal to strengthen nearmiss reporting on the San Diego Subdivision starting in January 1 with the help of COASTER engineers. Therefore, it should be understood that the increase in near-misses from 13 to 1 on the San Diego Subdivision is the reflection of improved reporting, which more accurately represents the near-miss activities taking place along the San Diego Subdivision. A chart is provided for each subdivision comparing 1 near-misses to 13 near-misses by month. For January 1 there were a total of 31 near-misses compared to 19 in January 13. For January 1 the Escondido Subdivision reported 8 pedestrian and 6 vehicle near-misses, while showing a slight decrease in vehicular near-misses for 1. The San Diego Subdivision reported 1 pedestrian, vehicle, and 1 bicyclist near-misses, a marked increase over 13 due to improved reporting. Escondido Subdivision Near-Misses January 13 and 1 1 9 8 7 6 5 3 13 January 1 Escondido Sub - Pedestrian Escondido Sub - Vehicular Escondido Sub - Bicyclist

San Diego Subdivision Near-Misses January 13 and 1 (Reminder: Significant Improved Reporting in 1) 16 1 1 1 8 6 13 January San Diego Sub - Pedestrian San Diego Sub - Vehicular San Diego Sub - Bicyclist

Rail Unusual Occurrence Report Unusual occurrences are railroad issues that must be examined or resolved effectively to maintain safe and efficient railroad service delivery and may or may not cause delays on either subdivision. These issues fall into the five categories of railcar issues, external issues, track issues, security/medical issues, and unsafe behavior issues. Most unusual occurrences are a snapshot of minor problems, expected to an extent, which are managed accordingly to maintain system safety and minimize service delays. The measuring of unusual occurrences began in 13 with the intent to trend accountability of minor problems in an effort to provide insight on areas or activities that may need reexamination or reemphasis. This chart compares January 13 with January 1. A total of 37 unusual occurrences were recorded in 1 compared with 35 in 13 Unusual Occurrences for January 13 and 1 18 16 1 1 1 8 6 13 January Railcar External Track Security Unsafe Act

National Transit Database NCTD submits non-major (NM) and major (M) incident data on all transit modes to the Federal Transit Administration s National Transit Database (NTD) each month. Major incidents include: a fatality due to an incident (includes suicides); one or more persons immediately transported away from the scene for medical attention, property damage equal to or exceeding $5, and/or an evacuation due to life safety reasons. Non-major incidents are incidents that require the passenger to be transported from the scene by ambulance, including those categorized as injuries involving boarding/alighting (stairs, lift/ramp, other) in transit vehicles, securement issues in other vehicles, or incidents involving ramps, stairs, escalators, or elevators at revenue facilities. All the incidents included in this KPI are specific to NCTD operations. This report compares non-major and major incident data per NTD requirements for January 13 and January 1. There were zero () accidents for all modes in both January 13 and January 1. Workers Compensation Claims The tracking of workers compensation claims is a new KPI for 1. This table shows how many days of work were lost or lost time per transit mode. The worker s compensation claims and lost days are for contracted employees for the specific modes. NCTD will use the data in part to identify and mitigate risks and hazards. Worker s Compensation Claims (lost time in days) Mode BREEZE Contract Operations 89 FLEX/LIFT Contract Operations COASTER Contract Operations SPRINTER Contract Operations NCTD Direct Staff

System Safety Review Committee Top Initiatives Tracking The SSRC is a management-level safety committee that meets quarterly, or as needed, to address priority safety issues. The SSRC focuses on three to five top issues identified as needing further safety review and potential follow-up corrective actions. This table provides the status of the current top SSRC initiatives. Status may be either 1) new initiative, ) in progress, or 3) closed. Further information on these initiatives may be requested from the Safety Division. As projects are completed, new initiatives will appear to take their place. The next System Safety Review Committee meeting is scheduled for April, 1. System Safety Review Committee Activities Table Initiative Jurisdiction Status Del Mar Pedestrian Safety Review Del Mar In progress Outreach campaign under development with a goal start date of March 1. Palomar College Transit Center pavement cracking San Marcos Closed soil testing and reports of the area are in progress. This is submitted for capital projects. Projected number of Form B s on the San Diego Subdivision General In progress further solutions to be considered in addition to the originally proposed limitation of Form B s. SSRC subcommittee established. Stuart Mesa Maintenance Facility Fall Protection Facility In progress current fall protection does exist. Study to be concluded by the next SSRC with result to be shared.