Quick run through of the four projects

Similar documents
Temporal Variability of Soil Gas Concentrations and Pressure Under Natural Weather Conditions at Petroleum Hydrocarbon Impacted Sites

EAS Basic Soil Gas Sampler

Laboratory Hardware. Custom Gas Chromatography Solutions WASSON - ECE INSTRUMENTATION. Engineered Solutions, Guaranteed Results.

Laboratory Hardware. Custom Gas Chromatography Solutions WASSON - ECE INSTRUMENTATION. Custom solutions for your analytical needs.

UNITY 2 TM. Air Server Series 2 Operators Manual. Version 1.0. February 2008

Supporting Information for Micro-Collection of. Gases in a Capillary Tube: Preservation of Spatial

Measurement Device Deployment & Interpretation of Results. Topic 3 - Audio 33. Key Points

DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING OF AIR EXCHANGE RATE METHODS TO IMPROVE COST EFFECTIVENESS WHILE MAINTAINING ACCURACY

General Specifications: Forensic. Petrochemical Environmental. Lab Quality Analyses in the Field, It Goes with you Anywhere!

Vapor Intrusion. Sampling Solutions VAPOR INTRUSION. Sampling Solutions

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Methods for Measuring Groundwater Elevation and Vacuum Pressure During Soil Vapor Extraction

1999 Microcomponents Technology SLYA017A

Reliable, accurate groundwater Diver dataloggers and software. Diver-Suite

Method for HOBO Water Level Logger Deployment and Assessing Hydroperiods on Tidal Marsh Platforms

METHOD 3C - DETERMINATION OF CARBON DIOXIDE, METHANE, NITROGEN, AND OXYGEN FROM STATIONARY SOURCES

Demystifying the Process of Calibrating your Thermal Desorption Gas Chromatography System using Compressed Gas Standards.

ENSURING AN ACCURATE RESULT IN AN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEM PART 1: UNDERSTANDING AND MEASURING TIME DELAY

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

The HumiPyc ( Model 2) - Gas Pycnometer; Density, Moisture, Permeation Analyzer; Filter Integrity Tester; RH sensor Calibrator

Lung Volumes and Capacities

Generating Calibration Gas Standards

CHM Gas Chromatography: Our Instrument Charles Taylor (r10)

1. Compute the TWA for the following respirable dust exposures:

What I have learned about SF 6 gas testing.a Practical explanation

MV5: Automated concentration system

The HumiPyc - Model 1 - Gas Pycnometer; Density, Moisture, Permeation Analyzer; RH sensor Calibrator

DETERMINATION OF TETRAHYDROTHIOPHENE IN AMBIENT AIR BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY WITH A PFPD DETECTOR COUPLED TO A PRECONCENTRATION TECHNOLOGY

TECHNICAL BULLETIN CRYOGENIC APPLICATION SERVICES. website:

Environmental Petrochemical, Pharmaceutical, Foods & Flavors, Chemicals, Personal Care, Forensics,...and more!

OMCL Network of the Council of Europe QUALITY ASSURANCE DOCUMENT

Experiment C-6 Gas Solubility

WATER LEVEL DATALOGGERS

B. Assemble the Method-25 sample train with a heated probe/filter.

DURRIDGE STAINLESS STEEL SOIL GAS PROBE

WATER LEVEL DATALOGGERS

Mass Spec will not Autotune

Sampling Considerations for Equilibrium Dissolved Oxygen [DO] Sensors

Video Notes. LC Troubleshooting Series Retention Time Shifts

Manual for continuous distillation

Total Suspended Solids, Stable Flow, and Wet Weather Event Monitoring in the Bass River Watershed. December The Cadmus Group, Inc.

Evaluation of Leak Check Procedures. Suzie Nawikas, Dave Balkenbush H&P Mobile Geochemistry, Inc. AEHS San Diego - March 20, 2013

BENCH-SCALE INVESTIGATIONS ON VIBRATORY MOBILIZATION OF IMMISCIBLE LIQUID GANGLIA

SECTION 2 HYDROLOGY AND FLOW REGIMES

Setting a New Standard in Flash Chromatography Performance

Simplified Backflush Using Agilent 6890 GC Post Run Command Application Note

Optimizing Vial Pressurization Parameters for the Analysis of <USP 467> Residual Solvents Using the 7697A Headspace Sampler

GCMSD-Headspace Analysis SOP

Vapor Pressure of Liquids

Low-Flow Purging Procedure with MicroPurge basics Equipment. MP10 Bladder Pump Controller MP15 Control. MP30 Drawdown Meter.

Vapor Pressure of Liquids

H o w t o U s e a R e g u l a t o r t o R e d u c e T i m e D e l a y i n a n A n a l y t i c a l S y s t e m

Total Suspended Solids, Stable Flow, and Wet Weather Event Monitoring in the Unnamed Tributary to the Grand River Watershed.

Experiment GC : Analysis of BTEX by GC-FID

SOIL GAS SAMPLING SOP#: 2042 DATE: 06/01/96 REV. #: SCOPE AND APPLICATION 3.0 SAMPLE PRESERVATION, CONTAINERS, HANDLING, AND STORAGE

6890 GC Site Preparation

Automated Determination of Dissolved Gases in Water Anne Jurek

Aerobic Respiration. Evaluation copy

Application Note AN-107

Agilent 7697A Headspace Sampler

Vapor Pressure of Liquids

Diver-Suite. Reliable, accurate groundwater Diver dataloggers and software

Denise L Seman City of Youngstown

UNIFIED FACILITIES GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS

The instrument will process the samples one by one till all the samples have been cleaned up.

Potter Nitrogen Generators

BROWNFIELD ASSESSMENT, REDEVELOPMENT & REMEDIATION

Superior Result from Analytical Instruments The constant purity of the nitrogen improves system stability and ensures reproducible results

A Depletion Compensated Wet Bath Simulator For Calibrating Evidential Breath Alcohol Analyzers

Application Note. Rapid performance verification of AZURA systems with refractive index detector. Summary. Introduction

Vapor Pressure of Liquids

Chapter 4: Ventilation Test Bank MULTIPLE CHOICE

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Chapter 7. SCIIB Pressure Sensor Performance Evaluations: Experiments, Results and Discussions

PANACEA P200 STAINLESS STEEL USER MANUAL

University of Minnesota Nano Center Standard Operating Procedure

1. Study the performance of a binary distillation column operated in batch mode.

A Conceptual Understanding of Leakage During Soil-Gas Sampling

A New GC/MS System Designed for Helium Carrier Gas Conservation

OCN 201 Lab Fall 2009 OCN 201. Lab 9 - El Niño

Varian 3300 Gas Chromatograph Abbreviated Operating Instructions

CLOSED LOOP SOLVENT EMISSIONS CONTROL. David C.H. Grant

TEMPLE UNIVERSITY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND RADIATION SAFETY

Sampling Equipment Catalog. MicroPurge Low-Flow Pump Control

6850 Series Control Module User Information

Evaluation copy. Vapor Pressure of Liquids. computer OBJECTIVES MATERIALS

EN1279 part 3 assessment of insulating glass: IGU with Duralite sealant

EXPERIMENT 12 GAS LAWS ( BOYLE S AND GAY-LUSSAC S LAW)

LEAP CO 2 Laboratory CO 2 mixtures test facility

Automated Determination of Dissolved Gases in Water Anne Jurek. Abstract: Discussion:

Mitos Fluika Pressure and Vacuum Pumps Datasheet

APPLICATION NOTE. GC Integrated Permeation Device

Quality Assurance Charting for QC Data

Modeling Diffusion Rates of a Gas in an Enclosed Space

Single-Interval Gas Permeability Testing

FAST EVAPORATION AT NORMAL PRESSURE

PANACEA P100 LOW PRESSURE USER MANUAL

Zebron Gas Management

SITE TESTING STANDARDS FOR METHANE

Reliable, accurate groundwater Diver dataloggers and software. Diver-Suite

Transcription:

1

Quick run through of the four projects 2

3

4

Vandenberg AFB Study Site. Mobile lab in center. San dune environment. Ground water contamination of TCE at ~18 to 20 feet bgs. 5

This research program addressed three key parameters that are expected to have a material impact on soil-gas sample representativeness and analytical results: sample purge rate, purge volume, and sample volume. Experiments were conducted to evaluate the effect of each principal parameter while holding all other principal parameters constant at the baseline settings. Each of the three experiments was conducted on separate days, which allowed the sample probes to re-equilibrate over night and minimized the effect of total purge volume. A subset of five of the fifteen soil vapor probes was selected for each of the experiments. 6

Tests were conducted on five probes (15-SV-B1 through 15-SV-B5) all at depths approximately 2 to 4 feet above the water table (~17 bgs to 20 bgs). 7

In general, there was a very modest increase, less than a factor of two, in measured TCE concentrations with increasing purge rate over the range of 100 ml/min to 5,000 ml/min. Furthermore, the relative percent difference (RPD) between the maximum and minimum concentrations measured at each of the probes tested ranged from 37 to 56 percent with the exception of the results from probe 15-SV-B1, which had an RPD of 82 percent. These RPDs can be compared to the RPD for the temporal control sample of 44 percent. While these data appear to show a trend toward increasing TCE concentrations with increased purge rate, changes in concentration of this magnitude would not be considered significant for site characterization or vapor intrusion applications. 8

Tests were conducted on five of the probes in the array. Two of the five array probes (15-SV-B1 and 15-SV-B4) had been used for the purge rate experiment the day before. The probe depths were approximately 2 to 4 feet above the water table (~17 bgs to 20 bgs). 9

A statistically significant positive correlation was observed between sample concentrations and purge volume; however, variations were less than a factor of three over the range of purge volumes tested (1-20 system volumes). The variation over purge volumes typically recommended for soil gas surveys (i.e., 3 to 5 volumes) was less than a factor of two. The concentrations measured after purging two system volumes were consistently higher than those measured after withdrawing only one volume. Increasing purge volumes above 6 system volumes did result in higher concentrations. While these variations would not generally be considered significant from a site characterization or vapor intrusion perspective, based upon these data, it appears that purge volumes of 2 to 6 system volumes are most appropriate under the conditions samples. Based upon the initial results, a shallow (5 feet bgs) temporary vapor probe was installed (15-SV-C4HP) to test the hypothesis that the increased TCE concentrations in the two probes were due to larger purge volumes drawing in vapors from the capillary fringe. This shallow probe showed little increase in concentration from six to twenty purge volumes suggesting that interference with the capillary fringe could have been occurring with the deeper probes. 10

Tests were conducted on five of the probes in the array. Two of the five array probes (15-SV-B1 and 15-SV-B4) had been used for the purge rate and the purge volume experiments on two previous days. The probe depths were approximately 2 to 4 feet above the water table (~17 bgs to 20 bgs). Because the purge volume necessarily increased during this experiment as consecutive samples were collected; this experiment was similar to the prior experiment except that the sample volume was integrated in this experiment (60 ml grab samples were collected at the end of the purge volume in the prior experiment). Samples were collected from five probes, with sample volumes ranging from 25 to 6,000 milliliters (ml). 11

In four of the five probes, the variation in concentration was less than a factor of two over 25 ml to 1,000 ml sample volumes. In one probe (15-SV- B3) the variation was a factor of four. These results are fairly consistent with the purge volume test results over the volumes extracted (the maximum volumes of soil gas extracted were approximately 1,400 ml and 1,700 ml for the purge volume and sample volume experiments, respectively. Measured concentrations decreased in the 6,000 ml samples relative to the 1,000 ml samples. This drop in measured TCE concentrations from the 1,000 ml to the 6,000 ml samples is noteworthy as the 6,000 ml sample volume is often used in the industry (i.e., 6-liter SUMMA canisters). This study suggests that 6-liter samples may result in lower concentrations than 500 or 1,000 ml samples. One potential cause for the observed drop in measured TCE concentrations in the 6,000 ml samples is over-purging of the system.. 12

This research program focused on the temporal variations in soil gas due to changes in meteorological conditions. A subset of twelve of the existing probes was utilized for this investigation. The probes utilized for this investigation were at depths ranging from 3 feet to 17.5 feet below ground surface (bgs). An Onset HOBO weather station integrated with a SolarStream Satellite data transceiver was deployed to continuously monitor and record atmospheric temperature, relative humidity, barometric pressure, wind speed, wind direction, and precipitation. Soil temperature and soil moisture probes were installed at depths of 3 feet, 8 feet and 17 feet bgs and integrated with the HOBO weather station data logger. Soil-gas pressure probes were also installed at the same depths and integrated with a second data logger. 13

A unique part of this program consisted of the analytical system used to measure soil gas concentrations. An automated gas chromatograph (GC) measured soil gas concentrations every hour from each of the 12 probes continuously around the clock for a period of approximately 6 weeks from March 16 Soil-gas pressure probes were installed at 17 feet, 8 feet and 3 feet bgs and integrated with a second data logger. to April 30, 2007. A low flow rate pump drew vapor through a stream selection valve integrated with the GC. The entire system was controlled remotely from the H&P office through a wireless connection and the data were reported back to the H&P office in real time. 14

15

16

This is a plot of data recently collected for an EPA funded study by an automated instrument at at Vandenberg AFB site from three probes at the same location but at different depth (3, 8, & 17 bgs). This plot consists of over 750 points per probe collected once per hour over a 6 week period from mid March to mid April 2007. The soil gas concentrations varied by less than 10% over these four days even for probes only 3 feet below the surface. 17

This is a plot of data recently collected for an EPA funded study by an automated instrument at at Vandenberg AFB site from three probes at the same location but at different depth (3, 8, & 17 bgs). This plot consists of over 500 points per probe collected once per hour over a 4 week period from mid March to mid April 2007. The soil gas concentrations varied by less than 10% over these four days even for probes only 3 feet below the surface. 18

19

20

21

22

A unique part of this program consisted of the analytical system used to measure soil gas concentrations. An automated gas chromatograph (GC) measured soil gas concentrations every hour from each of the 12 probes continuously around the clock for a period of approximately 6 weeks from March 16 Soil-gas pressure probes were installed at 17 feet, 8 feet and 3 feet bgs and integrated with a second data logger. to April 30, 2007. A low flow rate pump drew vapor through a stream selection valve integrated with the GC. The entire system was controlled remotely from the H&P office through a wireless connection and the data were reported back to the H&P office in real time. 23

Brief info about site setting 24

1. Groundwater at this site flows in an easterly direction and is slow-moving. 2. Plume originated over 20 years ago when releases from sewer lines and USTs occurred it is now about 1,000 feet long (large plume). 3. All sources were removed or sealed in the early part of this decade; thus, there are no continuing sources of chlorinated solvents. 25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35