Photo by: Darryl Hatheway, 2011

Similar documents
Sussex County, DE Preliminary Study Overview

Citrus, Hernando, and Pasco Coastal Hazard Analysis. Flood Risk Review Meeting Citrus, Hernando, and Pasco Counties, Florida December 14, 2017

2016 NC Coastal Local Governments Annual Meeting

Bay County, MI Coastal Hazard Analysis Flood Risk Review Meeting. May 14, 2018

St. Louis County, MN Coastal Hazard Analysis Flood Risk Review Meeting. May 2, 2018

Door County, WI Coastal Hazard Analysis Flood Risk Review Meeting. August 21, 2017

Bayfield & Ashland Counties, WI Coastal Hazard Analysis Flood Risk Review Meeting. June 05, 2018

Baraga County, MI Coastal Hazard Analysis Flood Risk Review Meeting. July 12, 2018

Monterey County December 3, 2014

San Luis Obispo County December 2, 2014

Physical Map Revisions in Connecticut due to Updated Coastal Flood Hazards F8: Maps in Transition

VOLUME 2 OF 5 VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER

Evaluation of June 9, 2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Study for Town of Weymouth, Norfolk, Co, MA

FEMA West Coast Sea Level Rise Pilot Study

2017 Preliminary FEMA Flood Maps Old Orchard Beach Town Council Meeting. Old Orchard Beach, Town Hall July 18, 2017

Open Pacific Coast Study. California Coastal Analysis and Mapping Project

The History of Coastal Flood Hazard Assessments in the Great Lakes

Ventura County. Open Pacific Coast Study. California Coastal Analysis and Mapping Project

FEMA Region V. Great Lakes Coastal Flood Study. Pilot Study Webinar. Berrien County, Michigan. February 26, 2014

City of Del Mar Local Coastal Plan (LCP) Amendment for Sea Level Rise and Coastal Flooding

UPPER BEACH REPLENISHMENT PROJECT RELATED

Bob Battalio, PE Chief Engineer, ESA September 8, 2016

Volume and Shoreline Changes along Pinellas County Beaches during Tropical Storm Debby

Future Condi,ons coastal hazard modeling and mapping

SANTA ROSA COUNTY, FLORIDA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

WASHINGTON COUNTY, MAINE (ALL JURISDICTIONS)

SUPPLEMENTAL DOCUMENT SEA LEVEL RISE SCENARIO SELECTION AND DESIGN TIDE CALCULATION

OECS Regional Engineering Workshop September 29 October 3, 2014

APPENDIX D-2. Sea Level Rise Technical Memo

SPO Regional Challenge Grant Creation of a Sea Level Adaption Working Group for Biddeford, Saco, OOB and Scarborough J.T. Lockman, AICP, Planning

Atlantic Coast of Long Island, Jones Inlet to East Rockaway Inlet, Long Beach Island, NY Construction Update

HURRICANE SANDY LIMITED REEVALUATION REPORT UNION BEACH, NEW JERSEY DRAFT ENGINEERING APPENDIX SUB APPENDIX D SBEACH MODELING

Figure 1 GE image of the Costa Sur & EcoEléctrica power plants, located inside Guayanilla and Tallaboa bay.

RE: Hurricane Matthew Beach Damage Assessment and Recommendations [CSE 2416]

SPECIAL SPRING 2018 STORM REPORT ON THE CONDITION OF THE MUNICIPAL BEACHES FOR THE BOROUGH OF STONE HARBOR, CAPE MAY COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

A REVIEW OF THE CONDITION OF THE MUNICIPAL BEACHES AS A RESULT OF HURRICANE SANDY IN THE BOROUGH OF STONE HARBOR, CAPE MAY COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

RI Regulatory Setbacks & Buffers: Coastal Management Issues

Boothbay Harbor Rotary Club May 12, 2016

Fortified For Safer Living

Coastal Hazards Study

Fact Sheet Ordinance Regulating Erosion Threatened Structures

Town of Duck, North Carolina

WALTON COUNTY, FLORIDA

We Make a Difference. New Maps, Now What? Updated Coastal Flood Hazard Information for Southern Georgia

GONE! Coastal Erosion Happens During Storms! Why Worry About Coastal Setbacks? Goals for Today

FINAL REPORT FOR 2013 ON THE CONDITION OF THE MUNICIPAL OCEANFRONT BEACHES THE BOROUGH OF AVALON, CAPE MAY COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

Structure Failure Modes

2013 ANNUAL REPORT - TO THE CITY OF NORTH WILDWOOD ON THE CONDITION OF THE CITY BEACHES

If you have a badge logo I d center it to this text. Douglas F. Jackson. Fire Chief / Emergency Management Director East Haven, CT

Low-crested offshore breakwaters: a functional tool for beach management

VOLUME 1 OF 5 VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER

Sea Level Rise and Coastal Flooding Why Waves Matter!

COASTAL HAZARDS. What are Coastal Hazards?

Figure 106. Locations of the 28 NJBPN profile stations in Ocean County, NJ.

2014 ANNUAL REPORT - TO THE CITY OF NORTH WILDWOOD ON THE CONDITION OF THE CITY BEACHES

Prioritizing Re-Mapping and Analyses of Rivermouths in California Coastal Areas. Following FEMA Region IX s Coastal Re-Study

ATLANTIC COAST OF LONG ISLAND, JONES INLET TO EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, LONG BEACH ISLAND, NY. Contract #2 Construction Scope. April 18th-19th 2018

Protecting our Beaches

FINAL REPORT FOR 2013 ON THE CONDITION OF THE MUNICIPAL BEACHES IN THE TOWNSHIP OF UPPER, CAPE MAY COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

OECS Regional Engineering Workshop September 29 October 3, 2014

Shorelines Earth - Chapter 20 Stan Hatfield Southwestern Illinois College

Beach, dune and development in the Borough of Mantoloking as of January Prepared for The Borough of Mantoloking: April 2, 2008

Wind Blow-out Hollow Generated in Fukiage Dune Field, Kagoshima Prefecture, Japan

Impact of Hurricane Matthew on the Atlantic Coast of Florida

Estuarine Shoreline Stabilization

VOLUME 1 OF 1 VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER

Dune Monitoring Data Update Summary: 2013

Delaware Chapter Surfrider Foundation - Indian River Inlet Monitoring

DELAWARE S VULNERABLE COASTAL AREAS. DELAWARE INLAND BAYS and DELAWARE BAY RECONNAISSANCE STUDY

ATLANTIC COUNTY 2006 to 2008

COASTAL ENVIRONMENTS. 454 lecture 12

REVETMENTS. Purposes and Operational Constraints. Purposes Erosion control o o. Revetment Design 4/5/2016. CE A676 Coastal Engineering

UNDERSTANDING STORM SURGE

PLAQUEMINES PARISH BARRIER ISLAND RESTORATION & SUSTAINABILITY. MVD/Gulf Coast Regional Dredging Meeting November 5, 2013

Figure79. Location map for the 10 NJBPN profile sites in Atlantic County, NJ 155

OFFICE OF THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR

Performance of Upham Beach T-Groin Project and Its Impact to the Downdrift Beach

Reading Material. Inshore oceanography, Anikouchine and Sternberg The World Ocean, Prentice-Hall

VENICE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM UPDATE: COASTAL HAZARDS WELCOME

Figure 46. Locations of the 28 NJBPN profile stations in Ocean County, NJ. A new site was added in the Borough of Seaside Heights (#248).

Technical Methods Manual Prepared for October 2016 California Department of Water Resources and California Ocean Science Trust

Chapter 15 SEASONAL CHANGES IN BEACHES OP THE NORTH ATLANTIC COAST OF THE UNITED STATES

Technical Brief - Wave Uprush Analysis Island Harbour Club, Gananoque, Ontario

New Jersey Coastal Zone Overview. The New Jersey Beach Profile Network (NJBPN) 3 Dimensional Assessments. Quantifying Shoreline Migration

Building Coastal Resiliency at Plymouth Long Beach

Broad Beach Sand & Dune Habitat Restoration Project. Revetment Owners Meeting July 12, 2017

Figure 4, Photo mosaic taken on February 14 about an hour before sunset near low tide.

Soft Designs for a Harsh Climate: Trends in Coastal Engineering

DUXBURY WAVE MODELING STUDY

CROSS-SHORE SEDIMENT PROCESSES

MODELING OF CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS ON COASTAL STRUCTURES - CONTRIBUTION TO THEIR RE-DESIGN

LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM UPDATE

CHAPTER 4 - SHORELINE PROTECTION STUDY AND PLAN

2015 ANNUAL REPORT - TO THE CITY OF NORTH WILDWOOD ON THE CONDITION OF THE CITY BEACHES

Earth Science Chapter 16 Section 3 Review

October 4, Seabreeze Associates Limited Partnership Robert B. Fultz, General Partner 865 Highland Drive Boulder Creek, California 95006

OFFICE OF STRUCTURES MANUAL FOR HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC DESIGN CHAPTER 11 APPENDIX B TIDEROUT 2 USERS MANUAL

Dare County Nourishment Project Town of Duck

Technical Brief - Wave Uprush Analysis 129 South Street, Gananoque

Affects of Tides on Lateral Coastal Access at. Las Varas Ranch. Gaviota, California. Photos Courtesy of California Coastal Records Project

Transcription:

Photo by: Darryl Hatheway, 2011 September 11, 2015

Presentation Discussion Examine PFD V-Zone Mapping in Wave Runup Dominated West Coast Application of PFD V-Zone Mapping Criteria in Pacific G&S PFD V-Zone Mapping for Dunes with Coastal Structures Example Transects from Santa Cruz County (CA) at Pajaro Dunes

Presentation Discussion Limit of Moderate Wave Action (LiMWA) Definition LiMWA Operating Guidance Overview Challenges of Mapping LiMWA LiMWA examples for Coastal Counties

CCAMP/OPC Study Goals Determine revised Base Flood Elevations (BFEs) and flood inundation boundaries for 1%- annual-chance (base) flood total water levels Update the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) and Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Panels Assist communities with incorporating this information into risk assessment and hazard mitigation planning

Best Practices for PFD V-Zone Mapping Along California Coast 5

FEMA PFD V-Zone Mapping NFIP Regulations Coastal (PFD) Part 59 General Provisions, Definitions, and Program Description: Area of Special Flood Hazard Areas subject to 1% or greater annual chance of flooding in given year. Includes Zone A, AE, AO, and V. 500-year floodplain is NOT an SFHA. Coastal High Hazard Area (V Zone) Area of Special Flood Hazard extending from offshore to inland limit of primary frontal dune along open coast and any other area subject to high velocity wave action from storms or seismic sources. 6

FEMA PFD V-Zone Mapping Definition: a continuous or nearly continuous mound or ridge of sand with relatively steep seaward and landward slopes immediately landward and adjacent to the beach and subject to erosion and overtopping from high tides and waves during major coastal storms Landward extent: a point where there is a distinct chance from a relatively steep slope to a relatively mild slope (i.e., the dune heel) Implications: The PFD represents the landward extension of the VE Zone Purpose: Floodplain management tool to protect dunes and regulate coastal construction practices and building standards Delineation of the PFD is mandated by FEMA regulations Primary Frontal Dune Delineation Crest 1% TWL SWL Limit of runup Toe Primary Frontal Dune Dune Width Heel VE Zone PFD at Shorebird Condos

FEMA PFD V-Zone Mapping X Zone REGULATED PRIO R TO 1988 AE Zone VE Zone Wave Crest Profile 100-year SWEL Mean sea level 8

FEMA PFD V-Zone Mapping X Zone REGULATED SINCE 1988 VE Zone Wave Crest Profile Landward limit of storminduced erosion 100-year SWEL Landward toe of dune 540 ft 2 eroded Mean sea level PFD Area VE Zone Erosion VE Zone 9

FEMA PFD V-Zone Mapping Pacific G&S

FEMA PFD V-Zone Mapping Pacific G&S

FEMA PFD V-Zone Mapping The following is an example of a complex Primary Frontal Dune (PFD) identification at adjacent transects in the Pajaro Dunes, southern Santa Cruz County, California. The southern transect (Transect 1001) is protected by a rock revetment and backed by a condominium complex (Figure 1). The northern transect (Transect 2) is approximately 290 ft north, unprotected, and backed by houses and a road. Both have similar crest elevations.

FEMA PFD V-Zone Mapping Figure 1. Orthoimage of the Pajaro Dunes Transects. Dune toes (green square), crests (red squares), and heels (purple squares) are identified on adjacent transects 1001 and 1.

FEMA PFD V-Zone Mapping 14

FEMA PFD V-Zone Mapping For Transect 1001, the dune heel has been selected at 4 m NAVD88 (Figure 2). This is a relatively straight forward application of the PFD definition as the dune is subject to erosion in the winter and there is an obvious landward inflection point, where the profile transitions from steep to flat. At the adjacent Transect 2 (Figure 3), there is also a dune that is subject to erosion.

FEMA PFD V-Zone Mapping However, there are multiple crests and inflection points to identify as the heel. A heel is currently selected at a seaward inflection point behind the crest where the profile transitions from steep to flat at approximately 7 m NAVD88. However, the dune crest is only about 1 m above this which seems small. In addition, there is another small crest landward of this heel and another potential heel at approximately 3 m NAVD88.

FEMA PFD V-Zone Mapping Figure 2. Cross-shore profile of Transect 1001.

FEMA PFD V-Zone Mapping Figure 3. Cross-shore profile of Transect 2.

FEMA PFD V-Zone Mapping The location of the heel designates the VE Zone at Transect 2 and has implications for the houses immediately adjacent to the transect. Although we feel that the heel has been accurately identified in this case, we are looking for clearer guidance to rule out the landward heel. The dune has been impacted by human development making it difficult to determine where the natural, undisturbed inflection points would be for mapping.

FEMA PFD V-Zone Mapping PFD V-Zone (red) with runup TWL of 17 ft (blue) at Transect 1001 extends from shoreline to heel. PFD heel difference with runup BFE +4 feet (17-13 ft)

FEMA PFD V-Zone Mapping PFD V-Zone (red) with runup TWL of 17 ft (blue) at Transect 2 (two PFD heel options) extends from shoreline to heel. First PFD heel difference with runup BFE -6 feet (17-23 ft); and second PFD heel difference with runup BFE +7 feet (17-10 ft).

FEMA PFD V-Zone Mapping Discussion: PFD V-Zone mapping will map as a horizontal elevation across beach, through the dune, and extend landward to dune heel no matter the elevation difference. Is there a better mapping method?

FEMA PFD V-Zone Mapping Discussion: PFD V-Zone mapping will map as a horizontal elevation across beach, through the dune, and extend landward to dune heel no matter the elevation difference. Is there a better mapping method? PFD V-Zone mapping can result in large differences between the PFD heel location elevation on Pacific coasts with runup dominated BFEs (both positive or negative). How do we explain excessive elevation requirements for buildings (when true coastal risk is not apparent)?

FEMA PFD V-Zone Mapping Discussion: PFD V-Zone mapping will map as a horizontal elevation across beach, through the dune, and extend landward to dune heel no matter the elevation difference. Is there a better mapping method? PFD V-Zone mapping can result in large differences between the PFD heel location elevation on Pacific coasts with runup dominated BFEs (both positive or negative). How do we explain excessive elevation requirements for buildings (when true coastal risk is not apparent)? Many non-certified coastal structures (rock revetments) have dune-back shore-type and may not qualify for PFD V-Zone Mapping even if structure fails. Should we have an exemption criteria?

PFD Fact Sheet (www.fema.gov) 25

Best Practices of Limit of Moderate Wave Action (LiMWA) Mapping Along California Coast 26

LiMWA Mapping MiWA Zone The Coastal A Zone (CAZ) is defined in publications currently as the area landward of the V Zone and inland to the limit of the 1.5-ft breaking wave. This limit is defined as the Limit of Moderate Wave Action (LiMWA). For the purpose of this study the Coastal A Zone includes only the MoWA Zones. MoWA Zone

LiMWA Mapping The Moderate Wave Action Limit is delineated at the location where breaking wave heights are equal to 1.5 ft Why Coastal Non-Regulatory Products are a Win-Win Solution 28

LiMWA Mapping Coastal A Zone

LiMWA Mapping NFIP regulations make no distinction between the design and construction requirements for coastal AE Zones and riverine AE Zones Evidence suggests that design and construction requirements in some portions of the coastal AE Zone should be more like VE Zone requirements In the wake of Hurricane Katrina, a large number of buildings in AE Zones were damaged Laboratory tests have confirmed that wave heights as low as 1.5 ft can damage structures 30

LiMWA Mapping The LiMWA line on FIRMs is an information layer only I-Codes requires Zone VE construction standards in identified Coastal A Zone areas Communities that adopt Zone VE standards in the Coastal A Zone and reference the LiMWA area receive Community Rating System (CRS) credits, which could lower flood insurance premiums for residence and business owners 31

LiMWA Mapping Allows communities and property owners to better understand flood risk to their property Helps identify on which side of the line a property sits (impacted by less or more than 1.5 ft of breaking waves) during a 1% event Areas exposed to a breaking wave higher than 1.5 ft are subjected to high-velocity flows and/or debris that can erode and scour foundations and possibly cause failure Why Coastal Non-Regulatory Products are a Win-Win Solution 32

LiMWA Mapping FEMA issued an Operating Guidance (No 13-13) on October 30, 2013 to improve identification and mapping of the Limit of Moderate Wave Action (LiMWA) OG 13-13 Replaces PM 50 (first guidance on LiMWA released in the wake of Hurricane Katrina in 2008) 33

LiMWA on a FIRM 34

LiMWA Rules How to Map LiMWA 35

LiMWA Mapping Basics The LiMWA should be mapped at the same time as the overland wave analysis results The LiMWA should be interpolated between transects similarly to flood zone boundaries and gutters Where possible, LiMWA should not cross flood zone boundaries and gutters 36

LiMWA Mapping Basics The LiMWA should not be shown where the VE Zone is delineated based on the Primary Frontal Dune (PFD) or wave runup and/or wave overtopping The LiMWA should be mapped where modeling results indicates it The LiMWA should not overlap an existing gutter 37

LiMWA Mapping Basics The LiMWA should be delineated only in conjunction with a VE Zone For transects that originate on the open coast and cross barrier islands, multiple LiMWAs may be delineated, but only where there is a VE Zone associated with a shoreline 38

LiMWA Mapping Basics If inland wave heights fluctuate above and below 1.5 ft (due to regeneration and dissipation), only one LiMWA should be drawn - closest to the VE Zone 39

LiMWA Mapping Basics The LiMWA should not be depicted within the following zones: VE Zone Zone X (shaded or unshaded) AE Zone in which wave action does not exist, such as an AE Zone with a BFE corresponding to the stillwater elevation 40

Conclusion An overview of how to map LiMWA and reasons to map LiMWA has been provided. The mapping of the LiMWA is subjected to specific criteria but a lot of interpretation is present and open to engineering judgment. Examples of LiMWA mapping have been presented. They are part of the FEMA Risk MAP vision and aim at facilitating the communication of risk. 41

Additional Facts (www.fema.gov) 42

!! KNOW YOUR RISK!! Build Higher Build Safer 43

QUESTIONS? KEEP CALM AND KEEP MAPPING Darryl.Hatheway@AECOM.com