BLACK HILLS PLATEAU PRODUCTION COMPANY

Similar documents
Terrace Petroleum Corporation Cunning Wolf UL No. 602H, 1980 FNL and 467 FWL Section 6, Block 23, ULS Pecos County, Texas

1. The well has been shut in on a kick and the kill operation has not started.

DAY ONE. 2. Referring to the last question, what mud weight would be required to BALANCE normal formation pressure?

Casing Design. Casing Design. By Dr. Khaled El-shreef

INTERPRETATION NOTE ISSUED UNDER THE PETROLEUM DRILLING REGULATIONS (CNR 1150/96)

Study Guide IADC WellSharp Driller and Supervisor

INTERMEDIATE CASING SELECTION FOR COLLAPSE, BURST AND AXIAL DESIGN FACTOR LOADS EXERCISE

Texas Administrative Code

IWCF Equipment Sample Questions (Combination of Surface and Subsea Stack)

SUBSEA KILL SHEET EXERCISE No. 5

W I L D W E L L C O N T R O L PRESSURE BASICS AND CONCEPTS

APPENDIX A1 - Drilling and completion work programme

RULES OF THE OIL AND GAS PROGRAM DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES CHAPTER DRILLING WELLS TABLE OF CONTENTS

IWCF Equipment Sample Questions (Surface Stack)

Form MMS 123A1123S Electronic Version. Application. We have incorrect pressure tests for the annulars on subject ABP The ABP shows we

Float Equipment TYPE 925/926

Chapter 5 HORIZONTAL DRILLING

Practice Exam IADC WellSharp Driller and Supervisor

30 C.F.R. Subpart D Oil and Gas Drilling Operations

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Office of Oil and Gas Management

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL WELL POTENTIAL TEST, COMPLETION OR RECOMPLETION REPORT, AND LOG

SURFACE CASING SELECTION FOR COLLAPSE, BURST AND AXIAL DESIGN FACTOR LOADS EXERCISE

Understanding pressure and pressure

and and Norton J. Lapeyrouse CONTENTS

OIL/GAS WELL COMPLETION REPORT. Well Name and Number Surveyed elevation (feet): KB GL

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Office of Oil and Gas Management

Deepwater Horizon Incident Internal Investigation

Hydro-Mech Bridge Plug

PTRT 1471: Exploration and Production I. Chapter 6: Drilling and Well Completion

Casing Design for High Pressure/High Temperature Wells

Rig Math. Page 1.

PHE KE30-A8 WORKOVER PROGRAM

Why Do Not Disturb Is a Safety Message for Well Integrity

ECD Reduction Tool. R. K. Bansal, Brian Grayson, Jim Stanley Control Pressure Drilling & Testing

"Sharing To Be Better. Influx through failed cement in shoetrack during completion operations

Worked Questions and Answers

Casing! 07 An Overview!

The Developing Design of the Blowout Preventer in Deep Water

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL WELL POTENTIAL TEST, COMPLETION OR RECOMPLETION REPORT, AND LOG

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL WELL POTENTIAL TEST, COMPLETION OR RECOMPLETION REPORT, AND LOG

Wellwork Chronological Regulatory Report

University 31E 4. Ward County, TX. Rig: Union Drlg Rig 229. AFE: $1,393, DHC: $761, WI: Notes: Workover:

Oil Well Potential Test, Completion or Recompletion Report, and Log

August 21, Deepwater MPD / PMCD

BANDAR PANJI-1 WELL CONTROL INCIDENT REPORT

Coal and Water Protection. PADEP: Well Plugging & Subsurface Activities Division Bureau of Oil and Gas Planning & Program Management

Chapter 5 Drilling and Well Testing Practices

float equipment OPERATING MANUAL TYPE 505/506 Float Equipment 1. INFORMATION & RECOMMENDATIONS Float Equipment

Railroad Commission of Texas

OCEAN DRILLING PROGRAM

PROPOSED NEW SUB- CODE 1 RIG UP AND TEAR. Possibly Fits into Existing Code. 7/26/2018 Review PROPOSED NEW CODE EXISTING OPERATION

Step-Rate Formation Integrity Test Method for Geothermal Wells

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL WELL POTENTIAL TEST, COMPLETION OR RECOMPLETION REPORT, AND LOG

ENDEAVOR ENERGY RESOURCES

WellCAP IADC WELL CONTROL ACCREDITATION PROGRAM

Well Control Drill Guide Example Only. Drill Guide is the list of drills, questions and attributes that are in DrillPad.

Blowout during Workover Operation A case study Narration by: Tarsem Singh & Arvind Jain, OISD

Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission

Dilution-Based Dual Gradient Well Control. Presented at the 2011 IADC Dual Gradient Workshop, 5 May 2011 by Paul Boudreau, Dual Gradient Systems LLC

Oil, Gas and Salt Resources of Ontario

Subsea Safety Systems

PETITION OF SHELL OIL COMPANY TO MAKE PERMANENT THE PRESENT SPECIAL FIELD RULES FOR THE SOUTHWEST PINEY

DUO-SQUEEZE H LCM Mixing Tables and Operating Procedures

New generation of solid expandable liners help give operators a jump on trouble zones

Book 3 - Well Control Calculations

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL WELL POTENTIAL TEST, COMPLETION OR RECOMPLETION REPORT, AND LOG

RIH intermediate section casing in Bazian-1 exploration oil well

Extended leak off testing

D & V Oil Co. LP. Daily Completion Report - University CN A #6 API # /23/2016. Perfs ' ' Activity :

NOT TO COPY -- NO DISSEMINATE WITHOUT WRITTEN AGREEMENT. Presentation JB AG JCN JR 1

Tibor Szabó DRILLING THROUGH SHALLOW GAS ZONES IN HUNGARY

International Well Control Forum. IWCF Drilling Well Control Syllabus Level 3 and 4 March 2017 Version 7.0

W I L D W E L L C O N T R O L SNUBBING OPERATIONS

On-Off Connector Skirt

W I L D W E L L C O N T R O L SHUT-IN PROCEDURES

Squeeze Cementing. Brett W. Williams Cementing Technical Advisor January 2016 Tulsa API Meeting

Drilling Morning Report

W I L D W E L L C O N T R O L AIR DRILLING

W I L D W E L L C O N T R O L FLUIDS

SCORPION HIGH-QUALITY, FULLY COMPOSITE PLUGS

5. INSPECTION AND TESTING PROCEDURES

WILD WELL CONTROL WARNING SIGNS OF KICKS

MPD Technique in Haynesville Shale Delivers Significant Value in Over Pressured Zones, A Case Study on Four Wells.

Solid Expandable Tubular Technology: The Value of Planned Installation vs. Contingency

Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (COGCC) Completed Interval Report, Form 5A Data Field Definitions

DRILLING MANAGED PRESSURE REGIONAL OUTLOOK: EAST AFRICA REDUCED EMISSION COMPLETIONS SHALE TECHNOLOGY REVIEW

Monte Besler Consultant FracN8R Consulting LLC UNITED STATES

W I L D W E L L C O N T R O L CIRCULATION & WELL CONTROL

1 Scope... 2 Functions of cementing float equipment... 3 Definitions... 4 Calibration... 5 Test Categories... 6 General...

Design of the full casing program in a deviated well

Abstract Objective Scope of Study Introduction Procedures

Appendix K Appendix K

Kicks Controlling Techniques Efficiency in Term of Time

Offshore Managed Pressure Drilling Experiences in Asia Pacific. SPE paper

DRILLING HOSE SOLUTIONS

VOLUMETRIC METHODS and STRIPPING OPERATIONS

Cased-Hole Logging Environment

AMERICAN ENERGY - PERMIAN BASIN, LLC UL Daily Drilling Partner Summary

Hard or Soft Shut-in : Which is the Best Approach?

Chapter 4 Key Findings. 4 Key Findings

Transcription:

BLACK HILLS PLATEAU PRODUCTION COMPANY DRILLING PROGRAM Homer Deep Unit 9 11CH SHL: 300 FNL, 200 FWL, NWNW Sect. 9 T8S R98W BHL: 1350 FSL, 2100 FEL NWSE Sect. 15 T8S R98W Garfield & Mesa Counties, Colorado NOTE: This drilling program is as of February 26, 2014. Well is being proposed as a horizontal in the Mancos/Niobrara formation. 1) Estimated Formation Tops of Important Geological Markers: Location GL: 5,521.2 (Graded), KB: 5,545.2 (Estimated) Formation MD TVD Subsea TVD Lithology Oil/Gas/Water Wasatch Surface Surface Surface Shale w/ SS Stringers Possible Gas Mesaverde 1013 1013 4523 Sandstone & Shale Gas or Water Cameo Coal 2956 2956 2580 Coal, Silt & Sandstone Oil, Gas or Water Rollins 3285 3285 2251 Sandstone Oil, Gas or Water Cozzette 3466 3466 2070 Sandstone & Silt Oil, Gas or Water Corcoran 3685 3685 1851 Sandstone & Silt Oil, Gas or Water Mancos 3967 3967 1569 Shale & Silt Oil, Gas or Water Mancos A * 4352 4352 1184 Shale & Silt Oil, Gas or Water Moab 5106 5106 430 Bentonite Marker Bentonite Mancos B * 5536 5536 0 Shale & Silt Oil, Gas or Water Niobrara* 6618 6567 1031 Calcareous Shale & Silt Oil, Gas or Water Target* 8203 7221 1685 Calcareous Shale & Silt Oil, Gas or Water Permit TD 18,724 7041 1505 * Projected completion intervals. 2) Proposed Casing and Cementing Program Hole Size (in) Casing Size (in) Depth Set MD Wt./Ft., Grade, & Joint Cement 30 20 120 Line Pipe To surface w/ Class 3; 320 sx 14 3/4 10 3/4 1000 40.5#, J55, ST&C Cemented to surface w/ Lead: 198 sx Class G (12.5 ppg) Tail: 271 sx Class G (14 ppg) 9 7/8 7 5/8 6,410 29.7#, N 80, LTC Cemented 200 above TOG w/ Lead: 735 sx TXI (12 ppg) Tail: 170 sx Class G (15.8 ppg) 6 3/4 Cemented 200 into intermediate shoe w/ 4 1/2 x 5 1/2 Tapered 4 1/2: 11.6#, P 110, LTC 18,724 Lead: 85 sx ExpandaCem (12.6 ppg) String (x over @ 6,200 ) 5 1/2: 17#, P 110, LTC Tail: 1418 sx ExpandaCem (13.5 ppg) Yields: Surface Lead Class G Yield = 2.11 ft3/sk (12.5 ppg) Surface Tail Class G Yield = 1.54 ft3/sk (14.0 ppg) Intermediate Lead TXI Yield = 2.88 ft3/sk (12.0 ppg) Intermediate Tail Class G Yield = 1.16 ft3/sk (15.8 ppg) Longstring Lead ExpandaCem Yield = 1.60 ft3/sk (12.6 ppg) Longstring Tail ExpandaCem Yield = 1.36 ft3/sk (13.5 ppg) 1

The proposed casing and cementing program has been designed to protect and/or isolate all usable water zones, potentially productive zones, lost circulation zones, abnormally pressures zones, and any prospectively valuable deposits of minerals. Any isolating medium other than cement shall receive approval prior to use. The surface casing shall be set at 1,000 and cemented back to surface either during the primary cement job or by remedial cementing. Cementing to surface will isolate all potential fresh water zones. Slurry designed for full coverage with 50% excess. Intermediate casing is designed to have cement lifted at least 200 above TOG. Actual cement volumes will be determined by caliper log plus 10% excess. If caliper logs are not available, volume will be assumed hole size to TD plus 25% excess. Production casing is designed to have cement lifted at least 200 into the intermediate shoe. Actual cement volumes will be determined by caliper log plus 10% excess. If caliper logs are not available cement volumes will be calculated at 25% excess. Centralizers will be installed per approved centralizer program from cement vendor. All waiting on cement times will be adequate to achieve a minimum of 500 psi compressive strength at the casing shoe prior to drilling out. 2,500 psi compressive strength in 72 hours. Casing Design (All casing will be new or reconditioned and tested to meet or exceed API standards): Casing String Casing Strength Properties Minimum Design Factors Size (in) Weight Collapse Tensile Grade Connection Burst (psi) (lb/ft) (psi) (1000 lb) Collapse Burst Tension 10 3/4 40.5 J/K 55 STC 1,580 3,130 420 1.10 1.10 1.80 7 5/8 29.7 N 80 LTC 4,790 6,890 575 1.10 1.10 1.80 5 1/2 17.0 P 110 LTC 7,460 10,640 546 1.10 1.10 1.80 4 1/2 11.6 P 110 LTC 7,560 10,690 367 1.10 1.10 1.80 Casing Design Considerations/Safety Factors: A. Surface Casing @ 1,000 MD; 10 3/4 40.5# J/K 55 STC Purpose: Protect shallow fresh water and contain MASP to TD Maximum anticipated mud weight at surface casing depth: Maximum anticipated mud weight at intermediate TD: TVD at intermediate casing point: Surface setting depth: Max pore pressure: 9.0 ppg 9.8 ppg 6,398 ft 1,000 ft 0.572 psi/ft Evacuated casing with 9.0 ppg drilling fluid density Load = 9.0 ppb * 0.052 * 1000 ft 468 psig 1,580 psig Safety Factor 3.38 Assume kick with partially evacuated hole and influx gradient of 0.22 psi/ft (Calculations assume shoe will not break down) MASP (Load) 6,398 ft * (0.572 0.22) psi/ft 2,252 psig 3,130 psig Safety Factor 1.39 Load = 1000 ft * 40.5 lb/ft * 0.862 + 100,000 lbs (OPM) 134,911 lbs 420,000 lbs Safety Factor 3.11 OverPull with S.F. = 420,000 lbs / 1.8 34,911 lbs 198,422 lbs 2

B. Intermediate Casing @ 6,410 MD; 7 5/8 29.7# N 80 LTC Maximum anticipated mud weight at Total Depth: TVD at intermediate casing point: Assumed Gas Gradient for Production Operations: 9.8 ppg 6,398 ft 0.22 psi/ft Designed on evacuated casing properties with 9.8 ppg drilling fluid density with no internal back up Load = 9.8 ppg * 0.052 * 6,398 ft 3,260 psig 4,790 psig Safety Factor 1.47 Maximum Surface Shut In Pressure MASSIP (Load) = 6,398 ft * (0.572 0.22) psi/ft 2,252 psig 6,890 psig Safety Factor 3.06 Load = (6,410 ft * 29.7 lb/ft * 0.850) + 100,000 lbs (OPM) 216,820 lbs 575,000 lbs Safety Factor 2.65 OverPull with S.F. = 575,000 lbs / 1.8 116,820 lbs 202,625 lbs C. Production Casing @ 18,724 MD; 5 1/2 17# P 110 x 4 1/2 11.6# P 110 Maximum anticipated mud weight at Total Depth: TVD at production casing point: Cross Over Location Maximum Surface Treating Pressure for Fracture Operations Assumed Gas Gradient for Production Operations: 11.5 ppg 7,206 ft 6,200 ft 7,000 psig 0.22 psi/ft Designed on evacuated casing properties with 11.5 ppg drilling fluid density with no internal back up Load = 11.5 ppg * 0.052 * 7,206 ft 4,309 psig 7,460 psig Safety Factor 1.73 Design Consideration #1: Maximum Surface Shut In Pressure MASSIP (Load) = 7,206 ft * (0.572 0.22) psi/ft 2,536 psig 10,640 psig Safety Factor 4.20 Design Consideration #2: Maximum Surface Treating Pressure During Frac Operations MSTP 6,500 psig 10,640 psig Safety Factor 1.64 Load = (6,410 ft * 17.0 lb/ft + 1,790 ft * 11.6 lb/ft) * 0.824 + 100,000 lbs (OPM) 206,900 lbs 546,000 lbs Safety Factor 2.64 OverPull with S.F. = 546,000 lbs / 1.8 106,900 lbs 196,400 lbs 3

3) Operator s Minimum Specifications for Pressure Control: Please reference enclosed BOP Diagram. The blowout preventer assembly shall consist of one 11 5,000 psi double ram preventer, and an 11 5,000 psi annular preventer. All will be hydraulically operated. The BOP pipe and blind rams will be hydraulically tested to 100% of working pressure (if isolated from the surface casing with a test plug) or to 70% of the internal yield of the surface casing after nippling up. The annular preventer will be tested to 50% of its working pressure rating for 10 minutes or until provisions for the test are met. The pipe rams and blind rams will be function tested on each trip out of the hole, but not more than once per day. All such checks will be noted on the daily Tour Sheets. Accessories to the BOPE include an upper and lower kelly cock, a sub on the floor with a full opening valve to be stabbed into the drill string when the kelly is not in the drill string, a drill pipe float (except for lost circulation conditions), and a choke manifold with a pressure rating equivalent to the BOP stack. An accumulator with a minimum of 1.5 times the volume of fluid necessary to close all BOP equipment will be part of the BOP system. Remote controls capable of both opening and closing all preventers will be readily accessible to the driller. A manual locking device (i.e., hand wheels) or automatic locking devices shall be installed as part of the system. The BOP will be kept in good mechanical working order. Checks and inspections will be recorded on daily Tour Sheets. Primary BOP actuating control will be located either in the doghouse or on the rig floor. Sufficient mud volume and weight material will be maintained on location to overcome any flows. Auxiliary Equipment: a) A Kelly Cock will be kept in the drill string at all times. b) A float will be used at the bit at all times (except for lost circulation drilling condition). c) A full opening drill pipe stabbing valve (inside BOP) with proper drill pipe connection will be on the rig floor at all times. d) The drilling fluids systems will be visually monitored at all times. 4) Mud Program: Hole (in) Depth (ft) Type Weight (ppg) Viscosity (cps) Fluid Loss (cc) Solids (%) 30 120 Spud Mud 8.9 9.4 60 80 10 1 5 14 3/4 1,000 Gel/Polymer 9.0 10.0 50 65 6 6 9 7/8 6,410 Gel/Polymer 9.5 11.5 45 55 5 5 6 6 3/4 18,724 Gel/Polymer 10.0 12.0 40 45 5 5 6 * Sufficient mud material(s) to maintain mud properties, control lost circulation and contain a blowout will be available at the well site during drilling operations. ** A closed loop system will be utilized during drilling operations. 5) Auxiliary Equipment: 1. A Kelly Cock will be kept in the drill string at all times. 2. A float will be used at the bit at all times (except for lost circulation drilling condition). 3. A full opening drill pipe stabbing valve (inside BOP) with proper drill pipe connection will be on the rig floor at all times. 4. The drilling fluids systems will be visually monitored at all times. 4

6) Testing, Logging and Core Programs: Deviation Surveys: 0 to 1,000 Totco (7º) survey every ±210 1,000 to 4,000 Totco (7º) survey every ±300 4,000 to TD ±90 ft MWD w/ INC, AZM, & GR Mud Log: 2 Man Unit with chromatograph 3000 to TD Samples: 100 ft samples 3,000 to 3,500 30 ft samples 3,500 to 6,300 10 ft samples 7,200 to 8,200 10 30 ft samples 8,200 to TD M/LWD Logging Program: MWD Gamma Ray and/or Resistivity with surveys from 3,500 TD Open Hole Logging Program: Triple Combo w/spectral GR/DIL/FDC/CNL Sonic 1,000 to 6,410 Cores: DST's: Possible sidewall cores in Williams Fork and/or Mancos None planned 7) Anticipated Abnormal Pressures or Temperatures: 1. No abnormal pressures or temperatures are anticipated. 2. No H 2 S gas has been encountered in or known to exist in the general area. 3. Pressures; Mancos pressure 0.572 psi/ft. 4. Estimated bottom hole pressure is 3,528 psi. 8) Anticipated Starting Dates and Approximate Duration: Starting Date: May 1, 2014 Spud Date: January 1, 2015 Drilling Days: 45 days Completion Days: 30 days Notes: Per OnShore Order 1, 3/7/07 the former 8 point drilling plan (also referred to as the Subsurface Use Plan) Due to the voluminous requirements of horizontal drilling, a larger well pad and pit are being proposed. The pit will be lined with 2 synthetic liners, each having a minimum of 24 mil thickness as per COGCC regulation 904.c.(1). The pit will contain freshwater and/or recycled flowback water for makeup water during drilling and fracture stimulation during completions. 5