Dec 2, Dear Tri Ong, Sam Woods, and Scott Kubly,

Similar documents
Eliminate on-street parking where it will allow for a dedicated bus only lane %

City of Seattle Edward B. Murray, Mayor

COWETA HIGH SCHOOL AND EAST HIGHWAY 51

Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) Preliminary Responses to Madison-Miller Community List of Site-Specific Concerns

BETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY

Scarlett Road Bridge & Road Improvements Lambton Park Community School - Gymnasium Tuesday November 28 th, 2017

Dr. M.L. King, Jr. Street North Complete Streets Resurfacing Opportunities HOUSING, LAND USE, AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MARCH 22, 2018

Southside Pilot Proposal

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

County of Greenville South Carolina. Traffic Calming Program Neighborhood Traffic Education Program and Speed Hump Program

Caltrans Sloat Boulevard Pedestrian Safety Project Response to Community Questions, Comments & Concerns

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

Agenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

AGENDA REPORT. Issue: Discussion of potential improvements on Barnwell Road at Niblick Drive

Duwamish Way-finding and CTR Report

Mission-Geneva Transportation Study Community Workshop 2 July 8, 2006

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Queensboro Bridge Bus Priority Study: Summary of Recommendations. Presentation to Manhattan Community Board 8 May 4, 2011

1 st and 2 nd Street Couplet FAQ s

Northeast 65 th Street Vision Zero Project Proposals From A Roosevelt High School Student Joe Mangan

Outreach Approach RENEW SF served as the primary liaison with the North Beach community; the Chinatown. Executive Summary

Advancing Transportation Choices in Des Moines. MPO Environmental Roundtable January 9, 2018

Chapter 3 BUS IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

Samish-Maple-Ellis Corridor Pedestrian & Bicycle Safety Improvements. Bellingham City Council March 26, 2018

Watertown Complete Streets Prioritization Plan. Public Meeting #1 December 14, 2017

City of Gainesville Transportation/Roadway Needs PROJECT SUMMARY

Geary Corridor Bus Rapid Transit

LTAC: Katie Mencarini, Central & Hampton Roads streets and a fifteen minute debrief to discuss the findings. Participants walked along Mill Road

What Is a Complete Street?

Traffic Calming SECTION 1, CHAPTER Introduction What is Traffic Calming?

Transportation Planning Division

Technical Working Group November 15, 2017

Transportation & Land Use. Workshop: March 6, 2013

Appendix T CCMP TRAIL TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DESIGN STANDARD

Bicycle Boulevards and Neighborhood Greenways

Steps to Conducting a Complete Streets Assessment

CAPITOL DRIVE & FOND DU LAC AVENUE INTERSECTION ANALYSIS. Urban Planning 772 SARAH BREGANT, RYAN PETERSON, & MATT WERDERITCH

MEMORANDUM. Earl Haugen and UND Transportation and Traffic Coordination Committee

Bluffdale/ UDOT South High-T Intersection Project Type Operations

MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. WAY

UPTOWN REGIONAL BIKE CORRIDORS PROJECT SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS

Monroe Street Reconstruction

Citywide Sidewalk and Crosswalk Programs

Rightsizing Streets: The Seattle Experience

M-58 HIGHWAY ACCESS MANAGEMENT STUDY Mullen Road to Bel-Ray Boulevard. Prepared for CITY OF BELTON. May 2016

Community Meeting February 27, 2007 Dorchester Avenue Transportation & Streetscape Improvements Action Plan February 27, 2007

COMMUNITY MEETING AGENDA

El Camino Real Specific Plan. TAC/CAC Meeting #2 Aug 1, 2018

Bellevue Downtown Association Downtown Bike Series

Governance and Priorities Committee Report For the July 2, 2015 Meeting

Ocean Park Boulevard Streetscape Improvement Project Alternatives & Trade Offs

Item No. 14 Town of Atherton

Protected Bike Lanes in San Francisco Mike Sallaberry SFMTA NACTO Workshop - Chicago IL

RapidRide Roosevelt Seat Sea t t le t le Depa De r pa t r men men t of Sept T an r sp an or sp t or a t t a ion

Better Market Street Project Update. Urban Forestry Council September 17, 2014

Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines

5 CIRCULATION AND STREET DESIGN

City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A

2.0 LANE WIDTHS GUIDELINE

Boston Post Road Design Feasibility Study

4 DISRUPTION MANAGEMENT PLAN HIGHWAY 7 RAPIDWAY CONSTRUCTION BETWEEN BAYVIEW AVENUE AND WARDEN AVENUE TOWNS OF MARKHAM AND RICHMOND HILL

Clay Street Bridge Replacement Project

Community Task Force November 15, 2017

HARRISON STREET/OAKLAND AVENUE COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION PLAN

section 4 Existing Conditions, Issues, and Options

Bay to Bay Boulevard Complete Streets Project

Route 29 Solutions Projects

Circulation in Elk Grove includes: Motor vehicles, including cars and trucks

Goodlettsville Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Executive Summary

Town of Mooresville, North Carolina Neighborhood Traffic Calming and Control Device Policy

25th Avenue Road Diet Project A One Year Evaluation. Transportation Fund for Clean Air Project #05R07

complete streets design and construction standards public primer City of Edmonton

Major Bike Routes 102 Avenue Workshop April 21, 2015

TRAFFIC ACTION PLAN. North Central Neighborhood CITY OF SAN MATEO

Mission Bay Loop (MBL) Public Meeting

Polk Streetscape Project

County of Spartanburg South Carolina

Broadway Complete Streets Project

4404 St. Peter Street New Orleans, LA (504) April 13 th, To Whom It May Concern:

Long Island Rail Road Expansion Project Floral Park to Hicksville

Ocean Park Boulevard Green Street Project Alternatives & Trade Offs

TRAFFIC ACTION PLAN. Laurie Meadows Neighborhood CITY OF SAN MATEO

Guidance. ATTACHMENT F: Draft Additional Pages for Bicycle Facility Design Toolkit Separated Bike Lanes: Two-Way to One-Way Transitions

Draft North Industrial Area-Wide Traffic Plan

Dear Mayor Murray, Top SR-520 Design Innovations and Remaining Opportunities

Frequently Asked Questions

City of Vallejo Traffic Calming Toolbox

Legislative Update Williamsburg Residency

Bicycle Network. Vision Zero San Francisco The City and County of San

Appendix C. TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM TOOLBOX

Arlington Public Schools Thomas Jefferson Site Evaluation Transportation Networks. Thomas Jefferson Working Group Meeting #6 November 10, 2014

6/22/2018 VIA . Darcy Goulart, Planning Manager City of Rancho Cordova Planning Department 2729 Prospect Park Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670

4 MOBILITY PLAN. Mobility Plan Objectives. Mobility Context. 1. Integrate with Local and Regional Transit Improvements

Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA

Unit Six: Driving Faster with More Risk URBAN, SUBURBAN, AND RURAL DRIVING

El Paso County 2040 Major Transportation Corridors Plan

EUCLID AVENUE PARKING STUDY CITY OF SYRACUSE, ONONDAGA COUNTY, NEW YORK

HUDSON, MA PUBLIC FEEDBACK SUMMARY Second Public Meeting October 26, :30pm Welcome and Rotary Trivia - 7:00-8:30pm Event

5/7/2013 VIA . RE: University Village Safeway Expansion (P13-019)

Transcription:

Dec 2, 2014 Dear Tri Ong, Sam Woods, and Scott Kubly, Thank you for providing us with the 2015 Arterial Asphalt and Concrete (AAC) repaving project 60% plan for Roosevelt Way NE. It's exciting to see the improvements currently planned for the corridor. We do have some comments and concerns regarding the plan. There are a number of things we like about the current plan. It's wonderful to see the expanded curb bulbs along the corridor, as well as widened sidewalks at bus stops. The removal of pedestrian push buttons (often pejoratively referred to as 'beg buttons', as they force people to ask permission to cross the street) is a welcome change. We're happy to see a portion of a protected bike lane included, and the removal of squeeze-points near the University Bridge that currently force people riding bikes to merge into traffic. However, the plan for the corridor still remains heavily focused on automobile travel, despite relatively low traffic volumes and close proximity to Interstate 5 and numerous parallel arterial streets. We dislike that the plan retains two general purpose travel lanes for cars. We're concerned that the protected bike lane removes parking in a business district, when it could instead remove a general purpose travel lane. We would like to see the protected bike lanes extended along the entire length of the project corridor. Some of the planned curb bulbs and widened sidewalks are too wide to allow for future protected bike lanes. We also think the intersection of Roosevelt and NE 45th St needs additional study to make it more comfortable for people walking and biking. Finally, there is a portion of the corridor near the bridge that still forces bikes and cars to merge dangerously which deserves to be looked at. Our in-depth comments are broken out into sections below. Thank you for taking the time to consider our concerns! Sincerely, Andres Salomon Seattle Neighborhood Greenways

The Good: 1) Curb bulbs are widened along the corridor. This makes crossing distances shorter for people walking, and slows down vehicles. Forcing cars to take a wider turn results in more time and distance for people driving to see people in a crosswalk. Curb bulbs that consume parking spots also increase sight lines at intersections, which would normally be blocked by parked cars. Despite a 7 foot width for the parking lane on the west side of Roosevelt, most of the curb bulbs only extend 4 feet or so. We consider this a good thing, as it means that the remaining 2-3 feet can be utilized for bike lane protection in the future. 2) Pedestrian push buttons are currently located on Roosevelt Way NE at the intersections of NE 64th St, NE 47th St, NE 45th St, and NE 42nd St. All of these intersections have heavy pedestrian traffic volumes. Pedestrian push buttons don't make sense along the corridor, and we're glad to see them removed in the plans. In general, the presence of pedestrian push buttons at full traffic signals indicates a lack of regard for pedestrians, and encourages pedestrians to cross without the protection of a walk signal if they miss their chance to hit the button before the signal changes. We encourage Seattle to remove them whenever possible. 3) A protected bike lane between NE 45th St and NE 40th St will be a welcome safety improvement. We're excited to see that the lanes will be implemented as early as this month on a temporary basis, so that they can be monitored and modified prior to the repaving. 4) The c-curbs near the bridge will be shaved slightly to allow people on bikes to pass through without being forced to merge with fast-moving cars while also avoiding cars merging from the ramp. This is a huge improvement.

The Bad: 1) Roosevelt Way NE suffers from very irregular traffic patterns, and from a large mix of different vehicles. Massive pup-and-truck dump trucks hauling soil from light rail construction mix with bicycles, buses, and delivery trucks. For most of the day, the road is underutilized, with clusters of cars collecting at every light. For a few hours, it can be congested (often due to congestion on Eastlake, NE 45th, or elsewhere). Instead of keeping this road as two general purpose travel lanes with a 30 mph speed limit, we would like to see it turned into one general purpose travel lane with lights timed for 25 mph. If additional capacity is necessary, we would prefer to see it provided through a parking lane with peak-hour restrictions. One full-time lane plus an additional peak-hour travel lane could easily meet Roosevelt's current capacity, while also providing businesses with parking on the off-hours. This would benefit everyone using the corridor, as it sees numerous collisions of all user modes. Roosevelt Way NE averaged 2 collisions per week in 2011, 2012 2) We are concerned that the removal of a parking lane instead of a general-purpose travel lane will result in a sub-standard protected bike lane, as well as 'bikelash' from nearby businesses. We believe that Roosevelt Way NE should be designed to prioritize the businesses, schools, and homes along the corridor, rather than automobiles attempting to speed through the

neighborhood. Many of the business owners we spoke to were concerned by both the number of collisions that occurred in front of their stores, and their need for parking. The current plan for parking removal on the west side of the street could actually result in additional speed by vehicles, as parked (and parking) cars tend to provide a calming effect. Additionally, the area in front of UW Medical will lack proper protection for the bike lane, and there will be conflicts with bikes and buses/patient loading. If one of the general purpose travel lanes were to become a bus stop and loading zone, this would resolve the conflicts. These bus stops and loading zones would become in-lane stops in the case of a parking lane with peakhour restrictions. To leave this segment unprotected would be a failure to build a truly All-Agesand-Abilities protected bike lane. 3) Roosevelt Way NE is an important corridor for people biking, connecting Maple Leaf, Roosevelt, University District, Eastlake, the University Bridge, two future light rail stations, and numerous businesses and employers. This is why the protected bike lane suggested for Roosevelt in Seattle's Bicycle Master Plan is considered a city-wide connector. Let's make it a priority to build these city-wide connectors now, rather than later. We would like to see the protected bike lane starting on the University Bridge and extending all the way to NE 65th St. Ideally this would be done as part of the 2015 AAC project, when it is most cost-effective to include the improvements. Delaying the implementation of a protected bike lane along the entire corridor means the potential for additional construction closures, cost, noise, and distruption to local businesses. 4) If we're not going to extend the protected bike lanes immediately, we need to ensure that the 2015 AAC project does not jeopardize future segments of a protected bike lane on Roosevelt. In places where curb bulbs and widened sidewalks are right next to the existing bike lane, we need to plan for the future.

One possibility would be to create bus and load-zone islands, similar to what was built on Dexter Ave. This should be made part of the AAC plans, with the bike lane being routed to the west of a load/unload zone or bus stop. One can imagine a five foot wide bike lane between the existing sidewalk and a seven foot wide island. In places where the curb bulb is simply too wide, it should be narrowed. 5) Roosevelt & NE 45th - 60% plans

The earlier AAC 30% plans had reduced this intersection of Roosevelt Way NE and NE 45th St down to three lanes, removing the right turn lane on the north side of the intersection and adding a massive curb bulb in its place. We were disappointed to discover that the 60% plans have readded the lane. This intersection is awful to cross on foot, and the painted island does little to help. We recommend removing the right turn lane if possible. We also would like to see a larger curb bulb on the south side of the intersection, next to the gas station. The gas station has numerous driveways which present a risk to people in the bike lane, vehicles making turns through the intersection, and people walking on the sidewalk and in the crosswalk. If driveway consolidation is possible, that would help greatly. This intersection already has a lot going on, and the driveways closest to it are not helping. Roosevelt & NE 45th - 30% plans 6) At NE Campus Pkwy, the bike lane will disappear and bikes will be forced to merge with cars. They will share two 11 foot general-purpose lanes. We think this needs to be examined more closely. At this segment of Roosevelt, there's a left-

turn lane that appears to be at least 13 feet wide. We think it's worth examining whether it's possible to narrow that lane (keeping in mind that buses turn there, but that they need a wide turn radius, not necessarily a wide lane), as well as narrowing the general purpose travel lanes. If we could free up 5 feet of space, that would allow for an unprotected bike lane. Green = 5' unprotected bike lane; Blue = edges of general purpose lanes After the left-turn pocket, the median island could be narrowed to provide additional space for the bike lane.