Traffic Assessment for Woodhaven Redevelopment. City of Rome Oneida County, New York. March 2, 2018

Similar documents
Sixth Line Development - Transit Facilities Plan

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

Ref. No February 19, Ms. Ashley Blissett, P. Eng., Senior Development Engineer City of Halifax PO Box 1749 HALIFAX NS B3J 3A5

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Creekside Thornton, Colorado. For. August 2015 November 2015 Revised: August Prepared for:

Transportation Impact Study for Abington Terrace

5858 N COLLEGE, LLC N College Avenue Traffic Impact Study

122 Avenue: 107 Street to Fort Road

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. Introduction

Shockoe Bottom Preliminary Traffic and Parking Analysis

Board of Supervisors February 27, 2017

Focused Traffic Analysis for the 200 Nellen Avenue Project

Access requests to County streets and roadways are processed through one of the following methods:

Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

9 Leeming Drive Redevelopment Ottawa, ON Transportation Brief. Prepared By: Stantec Consulting Ltd.

MEETING FACILITY 2901 GIBFORD DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Holiday Inn Express 2881 Gibford Drive Ottawa, ON K1V 2L9

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION, TENNESSEE PREPARED FOR: THE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION

Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies. Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004

Magnolia Place. Traffic Impact Analysis. Prepared for: City of San Mateo. Prepared by: Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

HENDERSON DEVELOPMENT 213, 217, 221, 221 ½, 223 HENDERSON AVENUE and 65 TEMPLETON STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW.

Traffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 2016

SECTION 1 - TRAFFIC PLANNING

Appendix C. NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Traffic Impact Study for Rolling Ridge Redevelopment

Peer Review of Highlands Neighborhood Traffic and Pedestrian Safety Plan

1609 E. FRANKLIN STREET HOTEL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

o n - m o t o r i z e d transportation is an overlooked element that can greatly enhance the overall quality of life for the community s residents.

TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES Clarksville Street Department

THE LANDMARK AT TALBOT PARK

MASER ASSOCIATES. Engineers Planners Surveyors TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY SEA GULL VILLAGE TOWNSHIP OF COLTS NECK

MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN

OTTAWA TRAIN YARDS PHASE 3 DEVELOPMENT CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

May 5, 2009 File:

Austell Road Access Management Plan. Georgia Planning Association Fall Conference October 1, 2009

Marina Loft (DRC 51-R-12)

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY And A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS FOR A SENIOR LIVING AND APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT

To: ACHD Commissioners and Director 3/14/2017. Peer Review of Highlands Neighborhood Traffic and Pedestrian Safety Plan Information Briefing

FRONT RANGE CROSSINGS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

TRAFFIC ACTION PLAN. Laurie Meadows Neighborhood CITY OF SAN MATEO

City of Fairfax, Virginia City Council Work Session

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. Kevin Even, P.E. Village Engineer and Public Works Director Village of Waunakee. From: Kevin Wehner, P.E. KL Engineering, Inc.

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE Traffic Department MEMORANDUM

INNER LOOP EAST. AIA Rochester Annual Meeting November 13, 2013 TRANSFORMATION PROJECT. Bret Garwood, NBD Erik Frisch, DES

COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT 2015 ROBERTSON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

INTRODUCTION THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM CLASSIFICATIONS

Traffic Impact Statement

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

West Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road

Giles Run Connector Road

Highway 49, Highway 351 and Highway 91 Improvements Feasibility Study Craighead County

Atlanta Braves Stadium and Mixed- Use Development

CHAPTER 7 ACCESS MANAGEMENT. Background. Principles of Access Management. Hennepin County Transportation Systems Plan (HC-TSP)

Complete Streets Policy DAVID CRONIN, P.E., CITY ENGINEER

City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A

APPENDIX L: COST ESTIMATING TOOLS

Overview. Existing Conditions. Corridor Description. Assessment

List of Attachments. Location Map... Site Plan... City of Lake Elsinore Circulation Element... City of Lake Elsinore Roadway Cross-Sections...

DIMARCO CANANDAIGUA PROPERTIES HOUSING PROJECT CANANDAIGUA, ONTARIO COUNTY, NEW YORK

Paul VI Redevelopment. Traffic Impact Study

Figure 1: Vicinity Map of the Study Area

The procedures to be followed in undertaking Non-Emergency work depend on the degree of traffic disruption caused by the work.

CHAPTER 4 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS

Include autoturn exhibits of WB-67 trucks at each roundabout.

Driveway Design Criteria

This Chapter sets forth the minimum design, technical criteria and specifications to be used in the preparation of all roadway plans.

Parks, Open Space, Trails and Recreation Master Plan

Cheyenne Metropolitan Planning Organization

Introduction...2. Multi-Modal Transportation Analysis TIA & Recommendations Design Proposal...3. Campus Pointe Development

Contents. Champaign-Urbana Mass Transit District Stop Placement Guidelines

RIVERSIDE, Newton MA BH NORMANDY RIVERSIDE LLC. Riverside Station. A green, transit-oriented community

APPENDIX E: Transportation Technical Report

CITY OF COCONUT CREEK IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING

DRAFT. Corridor study. Honeysuckle Road. October Prepared for the City of Dothan, AL. Prepared by Gresham, Smith and Partners

WEST AVENUE AND NEW ROAD TRAFFIC STUDY PART III WEST AVENUE CLOSURE ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

2.0 Ballpark District

Draft Report. Traffic Impact Study. Superstore, Wal-Mart, and Kent Development. Yarmouth, Nova Scotia. Prepared for

December 9, Mr. Robert Leslie, AICP Director of Planning Town of Bethlehem 445 Delaware Avenue Delmar, NY 12054

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY PROPOSED RIVERFRONT 47 MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT

URBAN QUARRY HEADQUARTERS 2717 STEVENAGE DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Urban Quarry 4123 Belgreen Drive, Ottawa K1G 3N2

MEMORANDUM. Matt Folden, AICP, MNCPPC Rebecca Torma, MCDOT. Nancy Randall, AICP, PTP Barbara Mosier, P.E., PTOE Kevin Berger

Governance and Priorities Committee Report For the July 2, 2015 Meeting

Application of a Complete Street

Brian D. Hare, P.E. Bureau of Design PennDOT PA APA Annual Conference Investing in a Sustainable Future October 5, 2009

Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

OFFICE/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT 1625 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Canada Inc.

NEW YORK CENTRAL PARK SUBDIVISION BLAIS STREET/ST-PIERRE STREET EMBRUN, ONTARIO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

4.0 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES

Scarlett Road Bridge & Road Improvements Lambton Park Community School - Gymnasium Tuesday November 28 th, 2017

FINAL Albertville Business Park AUAR Update Traffic Study

Date: September 7, Project #: Re: Spaulding Youth Center Northfield, NH Property. Traffic Impact Study

Donahue Drive Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

Preliminary Engineering Study

List of Exhibits...ii

DRAFT - CITY OF MEDFORD TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Roadway Cross-Sections

VIVA RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES OAKVILLE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Transportation Corridor Studies: Summary of Recommendations

Street Paving and Sidewalk Policy

Transcription:

March 2, 2018 Traffic Assessment for Woodhaven Redevelopment City of Rome Oneida County, New York Prepared for: City of Rome 198 N. Washington Street Rome, NY 13440 Prepared by: C.T. MALE ASSOCIATES 50 Century Hill Drive Latham, New York 12110 (518) 786-7400 FAX (518) 786-7299 C.T. Male Associates Project No: 17.7005 Unauthorized alteration or addition to this document is a violation of the New York State Education Law. Copyright 2018 C.T. MALE ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING, SURVEYING, ARCHITECTURE & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, P.C.

TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT WOODHAVEN REDEVELOPMENT CITY OF ROME TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION...1 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION...1 3.0 SITE CONDITIONS...1 FIGURES Figure 1 Existing Average Daily Traffic Volumes Figure 2 Proposed Average Daily Traffic Volumes

1.0 INTRODUCTION This traffic assessment serves to provide a preliminary assessment of the additional traffic volumes that the proposed Woodhaven Redevelopment project in the City of Rome will place on the road network immediately adjacent to the project site. The roadways included in this assessment include Floyd Avenue at Park Drive and Park Drive to Gansevoort Avenue. The scope of this study compares the existing average daily traffic counts with the projected increase in traffic as a result of the Woodhaven Redevelopment project. 2.0 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS The average daily traffic under existing conditions is provided via NYSDOT data. Floyd Avenue is classified by NYSDOT as an Urban Minor Arterial and Park Drive/Gansevoort Avenue is classified as an Urban Major Collector. Both roadways are City owned, two-lane paved roads, with average lane width 18 feet. There is a signalized intersection at Floyd Avenue and Park Drive, where there is a right-turn lane on Floyd Avenue eastbound turning to Park Drive. There are concrete sidewalks on both sides of Floyd Avenue and bus routes along both Floyd Avenue and Park Drive. Figure 1 provides a summary of the average daily traffic. In general, the average daily traffic counts are considered well within the acceptable range of traffic for this classification of roadways. There are no known congestion issues within the study area. 3.0 TRAFFIC GENERATION FOR PROPOSED PROJECT The trip generation estimate is for a weekday and is estimated based upon the Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 6 th Edition and is summarized in Table 1. - 1 -

Classification Access off Park Drive Single-Family Housing 79 Senior Townhomes 40 # of Units Unit Table 1 Trip Generation ITE Land Use Code, Page # Average Rate Total Daily Trips Generated Trip Generations Per Dwelling Unit Code 210, Page 263 9.57 756 Trip Generations Per Dwelling Unit Code 253, Page 463 3.48 139 Senior Apartments 1 Trip Generations 100 Per Dwelling Unit Code 253, Page 463 3.48 348 Total Trips to Park Drive 1,243 Access off Floyd Avenue Multi-Family: 10 unit townhomes, 7 buildings 0 Recreational Center 55,000 sf + fields 4 Extended Stay Hotel 36,000 sf 3 40 Trip Generation Per Dwelling Unit Code 230, Page 361 5.86 0 Trip Generation Per Acre Code 460, Page 738 33.33 133 Trip Generation Per Occupied Room Code 310, Page 503 4.14 166 Apartments Trip Generations 130 Per Dwelling Unit Code 220, Page 300 6.63 862 River Focused Commercial Trip Generation Per 1,000 sf Leasable 5,000 sf 4 2.5 Area Code 814, Page 1,224 40.67 102 Total Trips to Floyd Avenue 1,263 Trip Generation Assumptions: 1: Master Plan has 53,000 s.f. of senior living apartments. Assume 100 apartments. 2: Master Plan has 66,500 s.f. of multi-story mixed use buildings with an extended stay hotel. Assume extended stay hotel is one building and the remainder includes 1,000 s.f. apartments. 3: Average size hotel suite 600 s.f. 4: Assume River Focuses Commercial has an ITE trip generation similar to specialty retail center. - 2 -

The total amount of weekday trips generated as a result of the Woodhaven Redevelopment project is 2,506. 1,263 of these trips will be directly onto Floyd Avenue, as a result of the northern portion of the development. 1,243 of the trips will be directly onto Park Drive, as a result of the single-family residential and senior living portion of the redevelopment. Figure 2 provides for a summary of the trip generation and the direction of the traffic. Based upon existing traffic patterns, it is assumed that on Floyd Avenue, the new trips generated would be evenly split on Floyd Avenue east and west bound. On Park Drive, it is assumed that 75% of the new trips would travel north towards Floyd Avenue, with 25% traveling south to Gansevoort Avenue, eventually onto E. Dominick Street. 4.0 CONCLUSIONS The proposed Woodhaven Redevelopment project would add a total of 2,506 new weekday trips daily to the local road network, as summarized on Figure 2. This results in an increase of traffic to the road network. The amount of additional traffic on Park Drive and Gansevoort Avenue would be generally attributed to the single-family residential properties and the senior living facility. 932 new trips are anticipated to occur on Park Drive north of the project site and 311 new trips on Park Drive/Gansevoort Avenue south of the project site. This would increase the average daily traffic on Park Drive north of the project from 2,229 average daily trips to 3,161 trips, an increase of 42%. The average daily traffic on Park Drive/Gansevoort Avenue south of the project site would increase from 1,379 daily trips to 1,690 trips, an increase of 23%. The majority of this increase in traffic is associated with the single family residential development, which is actually redevelopment of the former abandoned housing located on these lots. So in fact, the traffic may be considered new as part of the redevelopment, but that traffic was historically present in the past when the air force base was in operation. The local road network has the capacity to accept this increase in traffic given the low existing traffic volumes on this roadway. The amount of additional traffic on Floyd Avenue is noted on Figure 2. This additional traffic includes trips associated with the mixed-use portion of the proposed project site, which will have driveway entrance(s) directly onto Floyd Avenue, just west of the traffic light with Park Drive. Additional traffic will enter onto Floyd Avenue from Park - 3 -

Drive, a total of 932 trips associated with this project. The average daily traffic on Floyd Avenue west of Park Drive would increase from 7,243 daily trips to 8,341 trips, an increase of 15%. The average daily traffic on Floyd Avenue east of Park Drive would increase from 6,956 daily trips to 8,053 daily trips, an increase of 16%. The local road network has the capacity to accept this increase in traffic given the low to moderate existing traffic volumes on this roadway. Prepared by: C. T. MALE ASSOCIATES Kathryn C. Serra, P.E. Project Engineer - 4 -

Figure 1 EXISTING AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME

Figure 2 PROPOSED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME