Urchin (Canada Atlantic)

Urchin (Canada Atlantic) Green Sea Urchin (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) Scandinavian Fishing Yearbook / www.scandposters.com British Columbia, Newfoundland and Labrador, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Quebec Diver, Towed dredges 11/5/18 Seafood Watch Consulting Researcher Disclaimer Seafood Watch strives to have all Seafood Reports reviewed for accuracy and completeness by external scientists with expertise in ecology, fisheries science and aquaculture. Scientific review, however, does not constitute an endorsement of the Seafood Watch program or its recommendations on the part of the reviewing scientists. Seafood Watch is solely responsible for the conclusions reached in this report. Seafood Watch Standard used in this assessment: Standard for Fisheries vf3

Table of Contents About Seafood Watch........................................................................................................................ Guiding Principles........................................................................................................................ Summary........................................................................................................................ Final Seafood Recommendations........................................................................................................................ Introduction........................................................................................................................ Assessment........................................................................................................................ Criterion 1: Impacts on the Species Under Assessment..................................................................................................................... Criterion 2: Impacts on Other Species..................................................................................................................... Criterion 3: Management ness..................................................................................................................... Criterion 4: Impacts on the Habitat and Ecosystem..................................................................................................................... Acknowledgements........................................................................................................................ References........................................................................................................................ 3 4 5 7 9 13 13 20 25 34 39 40 2

About Seafood Watch Monterey Bay Aquarium s Seafood Watch program evaluates the ecological sustainability of wild-caught and farmed seafood commonly found in the United States marketplace. Seafood Watch defines sustainable seafood as originating from sources, whether wild-caught or farmed, which can maintain or increase production in the long-term without jeopardizing the structure or function of affected ecosystems. Seafood Watch makes its science-based recommendations available to the public in the form of regional pocket guides that can be downloaded from www.seafoodwatch.org. The program s goals are to raise awareness of important ocean conservation issues and empower seafood consumers and businesses to make choices for healthy oceans. Each sustainability recommendation on the regional pocket guides is supported by a Seafood Watch Assessment. Each assessment synthesizes and analyzes the most current ecological, fisheries and ecosystem science on a species, then evaluates this information against the program s conservation ethic to arrive at a recommendation of Best Choices, Good Alternatives or Avoid. This ethic is operationalized in the Seafood Watch standards, available on our website here. In producing the assessments, Seafood Watch seeks out research published in academic, peer-reviewed journals whenever possible. Other sources of information include government technical publications, fishery management plans and supporting documents, and other scientific reviews of ecological sustainability. Seafood Watch Research Analysts also communicate regularly with ecologists, fisheries and aquaculture scientists, and members of industry and conservation organizations when evaluating fisheries and aquaculture practices. Capture fisheries and aquaculture practices are highly dynamic; as the scientific information on each species changes, Seafood Watch s sustainability recommendations and the underlying assessments will be updated to reflect these changes. Parties interested in capture fisheries, aquaculture practices and the sustainability of ocean ecosystems are welcome to use Seafood Watch assessments in any way they find useful. 3

Guiding Principles Seafood Watch defines sustainable seafood as originating from sources, whether fished 1 or farmed that can maintain or increase production in the long-term without jeopardizing the structure or function of affected ecosystems. The following guiding principles illustrate the qualities that fisheries must possess to be considered sustainable by the Seafood Watch program (these are explained further in the Seafood Watch Standard for Fisheries): Follow the principles of ecosystem-based fisheries management. Ensure all affected stocks are healthy and abundant. Fish all affected stocks at sustainable levels. Minimize bycatch. Have no more than a negligible impact on any threatened, endangered or protected species. Managed to sustain the long-term productivity of all affected species. Avoid negative impacts on the structure, function or associated biota of aquatic habitats where fishing occurs. Maintain the trophic role of all aquatic life. Do not result in harmful ecological changes such as reduction of dependent predator populations, trophic cascades, or phase shifts. Ensure that any enhancement activities and fishing activities on enhanced stocks do not negatively affect the diversity, abundance, productivity, or genetic integrity of wild stocks. These guiding principles are operationalized in the four criteria in this standard. Each criterion includes: Factors to evaluate and score Guidelines for integrating these factors to produce a numerical score and rating Once a rating has been assigned to each criterion, we develop an overall recommendation. Criteria ratings and the overall recommendation are color coded to correspond to the categories on the Seafood Watch pocket guide and online guide: Best Choice/Green: Are well managed and caught in ways that cause little harm to habitats or other wildlife. Good Alternative/Yellow: Buy, but be aware there are concerns with how they re caught. Avoid/Red Take a pass on these for now. These items are overfished or caught in ways that harm other marine life or the environment. 1 Fish is used throughout this document to refer to finfish, shellfish and other invertebrates 4

Summary This report provides recommendations for the Canadian fisheries for sea urchins, which include the red sea urchin (Mesocentrotus franciscanus) and the green sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis). Both species of sea urchin are found in kelp forest and rocky reef habitats. In Canada, the green sea urchin fisheries operate across multiple provinces on both the Pacific and Atlantic coasts, while the red sea urchin fishery is located along the Pacific coast of British Columbia. Fisheries are managed separately by four different regional offices of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO). The report covers the single red sea urchin fishery in British Columbia and the green sea urchin fisheries in British Columbia, Newfoundland and Labrador, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, and Quebec. Criterion 1 Fishery impact on red sea urchin populations is scored as "low" concern, since stock abundance appears to be stable and quotas on fishing mortality are restricted to 2 to 3% of legal-sized biomass. Although no reference points have been quantified in this fishery, the available data suggest that the stocks are being fished sustainably. Fishery impacts on green sea urchin populations are not well known for most of the fisheries because stock assessments do not exist. Some fisheries do collect CPUE data, but this is known to be a poor indicator of abundance in sea urchin fisheries. Green sea urchin has a medium inherent vulnerability to fishing pressure, so concern for these data-poor stocks is "moderate." The British Columbia fishery does have a robust stock assessment and multiple indicators that suggest the stock is being fished sustainably. Criterion 2 Fishery impacts on other species are low for all dive fisheries, which are very selective. The limited bycatch data from the New Brunswick drag fishery for green sea urchins indicates bycatch of kelp, and a number of invertebrate and finfish species. In addition, there is a relatively high discard rate for undersized sea urchins. Although there are no major concerns with any one of the species recorded as being caught, there is significant uncertainty about the impacts on kelp and other species generally, given the current data are out of date and dredge fisheries frequently have significant bycatch concerns. Criterion 3 All the Canadian sea urchin fisheries use a limited-entry system, and all have some form of formal management. The British Columbia, New Brunswick, and Quebec fisheries directly control fishing mortality through some form of quota or daily fishing limit, though only the British Columbia fishery has regular stock abundance estimates that directly inform the quota numbers. No explicit control of fishing mortality exists for the Newfoundland and Labrador, and Nova Scotia fisheries, though the Nova Scotia fishery does protect reproductive stock through some areas that are closed to harvest. Formal scientific advice is currently used in the British Columbia, New Brunswick, and Quebec fisheries, though only British Columbia has recent fisheriesindependent data to inform this advice. The role of fisheries-dependent data and scientific advice in the Newfoundland and Nova Scotia fisheries is absent or highly uncertain. In New Brunswick, the recommended assessment schedule has not been followed; too few data are available to determine whether the agreed-upon harvesting rate is being exceeded. Stakeholder engagement and enforcement measures are in place for all the fisheries. Criterion 4 5

The key concern with fishery impacts on the habitat and ecosystem is the physical impact of urchin drags on rocky reef habitat. The habitat impacts of the dive fisheries are minimal because harvest is done by hand. All of the Canadian green urchin fisheries implement some form of area quotas or area licensing that can help reduce the risk of localized depletion; several have areas that are closed to harvest and protect reproductive stock. However, none specifically manage for the ecological role of sea urchins, and the green sea urchin fisheries on the Atlantic coast are known to have a moderate-to-high risk of fisheries-induced alternative stable states. 6

Final Seafood Recommendations SPECIES/FISHERY CRITERION 1: IMPACTS ON THE SPECIES CRITERION 2: IMPACTS ON OTHER SPECIES CRITERION 3: MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS CRITERION 4: HABITAT AND ECOSYSTEM OVERALL RECOMMENDATION Green sea urchin New Brunsw ick, Diving, Canada Green sea urchin New foundland and Labrador, Diving, Canada Green sea urchin Nova Scotia, Diving, Canada Green sea urchin Quebec, Diving, Canada Green sea urchin New Brunsw ick, Tow ed dredges, Canada Green sea urchin British Columbia, Diving, Canada, BC Green Urchin Red sea urchin British Columbia, Diving, Canada, BC Red Urchin Yellow (2.640) Green (5.000) Red (2.000) Green (3.460) Good Alternative (3.091) Yellow (2.640) Green (5.000) Red (2.000) Yellow (2.830) Good Alternative (2.940) Yellow (2.644) Green (5.000) Red (2.000) Green (3.464) Good Alternative (3.093) Yellow (2.644) Green (5.000) Yellow (3.000) Yellow (2.828) Good Alternative (3.254) Yellow (2.640) Yellow (2.557) Red (2.000) Red (1.730) Avoid (2.198) Green (4.280) Green (5.000) Green (5.000) Green (4.000) Best Choice (4.548) Green (3.413) Green (5.000) Green (5.000) Green (4.000) Best Choice (4.298) Scoring Guide Scores range from zero to five where zero indicates very poor performance and five indicates the fishing operations have no significant impact. Final Score = geometric mean of the four Scores (Criterion 1, Criterion 2, Criterion 3, Criterion 4). Best Choice/Green = Final Score >3.2, and no Red Criteria, and no Critical scores Good Alternative/Yellow = Final score >2.2-3.2, and neither Harvest Strategy (Factor 3.1) nor Bycatch Management Strategy (Factor 3.2) are Very High Concern2, and no more than one Red Criterion, and no Critical scores Avoid/Red = Final Score 2.2, or either Harvest Strategy (Factor 3.1) or Bycatch Management Strategy (Factor 3.2) is Very High Concern or two or more Red Criteria, or one or more Critical scores. 2 Because effective management is an essential component of sustainable fisheries, Seafood Watch issues an Avoid recommendation for any fishery scored as a Very High Concern for either factor under Management (Criterion 3). 7

Introduction Scope of the analysis and ensuing recommendation This report provides recommendations for the Canadian fisheries for red and green sea urchins. This includes the green sea urchin fisheries in Quebec, Nova Scotia, Newfoundland (Atlantic coast), and the red and green sea urchin fisheries in British Columbia (Pacific coast). Sea urchins are harvested by divers and by vessel-towed urchin drags. Gear use varies between and within the different fisheries. Species Overview The red sea urchin is a large sea urchin species that is found in kelp forest and rocky reef habitats throughout the Pacific coast of North America. It is harvested for its roe, and commercial fisheries exist in Mexico (Baja California), the US (California, Oregon, Washington), and Canada (British Columbia). Green sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) are smaller in size and have a large, circumpolar distribution. They are found in northern Europe, northern Japan, and along both coasts of North America. Their European distribution includes Russia, Scandinavia and the British Isles. On the Atlantic coast of North America, they are found from the Arctic to Cape Cod, Massachusetts. On the Pacific coast, they range from Washington to Alaska. They are commercially harvested in Canada (Pacific and Atlantic coasts), the US, Iceland, and Norway. The Canadian sea urchin fisheries are governed by federal Fisheries Act and managed by the Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO). Four different DFO regional offices oversee the management of green sea urchin fisheries in Canada: Quebec, Maritimes, Newfoundland and Labrador, and Pacific. The British Columbian sea urchin fisheries are managed by the Pacific region DFO office. Red sea urchins are harvested throughout the extensive coastline, and licenses are divided between the north and south coast. There is an integrated fisheries management place in place and management occurs through a consultative process with stakeholders. The fishery is limited-entry and quota-based, with a limited fishing season and a minimum harvest size. This is a diver-only fishery. The British Columbian green sea urchin operates within a much smaller spatial range around Vancouver Island. The fishery is divided into two fishing regions: Northeast Vancouver Island and Southeast Vancouver Island. There is an integrated fisheries management place in place and management occurs through a consultative process with stakeholders. The fishery is quota-based, with individual vessel quotas, area-specific quotas, a limited fishing season, and a minimum harvest size. This is a diver-only fishery. The Newfoundland and Labrador green sea urchin fishery is a relatively new commercial fishery and is managed by the Newfoundland and Labrador (NL) DFO regional office. Fishing areas for green sea urchin align with lobster fishing areas, with most fishing activity taking place on the eastern side of Newfoundland and the southern Labrador coast. There is no integrated fisheries management plan, but the fishery is managed through area licensing and a minimum harvest size. This is a diver-only fishery. The New Brunswick green sea urchin fishery is managed by DFO s Maritimes regional office. Sea urchin fisheries operate primarily in two fishing areas in the Bay of Fundy that align with lobster fishing areas (LFA 36 and LFA 38). These fishing areas are managed separately, using similar management strategies. Conservation and Harvesting Plans (CHPs) are developed in consultation with license holders in the fisheries. The fishery is quota-based, with a minimum harvest size. LFA 36 operates competitively while LFA 38 issues individual nontransferrable quotas. Fishing seasons and minimum harvest size are also in place. The fishery includes both diver-harvesting and vessel-towed lightweight dredges ("urchin drags"). 8

The Nova Scotia green sea urchin fishery is managed by DFO s Maritimes regional office. The fisheries in eastern Nova Scotia and southwestern Nova Scotia are managed separately, using similar strategies. Conservation and Harvesting Plans (CHPs) are developed in consultation with license holders in the fisheries. Some license-holders hold exclusive rights to specific fishing zones, and the rest are licensed according to county. No official quotas are in place. There is a limited fishing season and a minimum harvest size. This is a diver-only fishery (DFO 2011) (DFO 2013) (Miller and Nolan 2008). The Quebec green sea urchin fishery is managed under the Quebec regional DFO office. There are 14 green sea urchin fishing areas, mostly along the north and west shores of the Gulf of St. Lawrence. Ninety-nine percent of landings come from two fishing areas (Areas 8 and 9) in the St. Lawrence estuaries, where fishing effort is concentrated. Regulations include a limited fishing season, area licensing, a minimum harvest size, and gear restrictions. Area 9 also has a limited number of fishing days allocated to each license (DFO 2016 QC AS). The fishery has licenses for diver-harvesting and the use of traps, but no trap fishing has occurred since 2007 (pers. comm., J. Dallaire). Production Statistics Global production of sea urchins increased rapidly starting in the mid-1970s with the development and expansion of commercial urchin fisheries outside Japan, particularly in Chile and the USA. Global landings peaked in the mid-1990s. The Chilean fishery dominates global production, and the Chilean sea urchin has made up over half of all landings in the past decade. Canadian sea urchin fisheries (for green and red sea urchins) represent 5 to 9% of global production in the past decade. Sea urchin commercial aquaculture is mostly limited to China, and represents about 10% of global production in the last decade. Figure 1 Global sea urchin production by country from 1950 to 2014. This includes multiple sea urchin species. Canadian production of sea urchins peaked in the mid- to-late 1990 s, following global trends. Earlier production was dominated by the red sea urchin fishery in British Columbia, though green sea urchins have made up 40 to 65% of production in the last decade. Most green sea urchin landings come from the Atlantic coast fisheries, 9

with the largest landings coming from New Brunswick. Aquaculture production facilities for the green sea urchin have existed in Canada since the 1990s, but none of these operations have yet become fully commercialized (Eddy et al. 2015) (James et al. 2015) Figure 2 Canadian harvest of red (M. franciscanus) and green (S. droebachiensis) sea urchins from 1990-2014. Data from DFO. Figure 3 Canadian harvest of the green sea urchin (S. droebachiensis) by fishery from 1990-2014. Data from 10

DFO.. Importance to the US/North American market. Canada is the largest source of sea urchin imports into the US market. From 2006 to 2015, over 80% of US sea urchin product imports (including live, fresh, frozen, and preserved) have come from Canada. Less than 10% of US sea urchin imports are re-exported, though the fraction of re-exports has increased over the past decade. Japan, China, and Taiwan are the main re-export markets. NOAA trade statistics do not distinguish different sea urchin species, so these import numbers also include green and purple sea urchins. (NMFS) Figure 4 Sea urchin product imports to the USA in kilograms, by country from 2006-2015. Data taken from NMFS, which does not distinguish between sea urchin species in their statistics. Common and market names. Mesocentrotus franciscanus is commonly known as the red sea urchin and Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis is commonly known as the green sea urchin. The roe of both species is marketed as uni. Primary product forms Red and greed sea urchins are harvested for their reproductive organs (gonads) or roe. Sea urchin is typically sold in the form of fresh roe (uni), where the test (shell) has been broken and the roe extracted for consumption. They may also be sold as fresh or live whole animals, with the test and spines intact. A much smaller amount is frozen or preserved for consumption. 11

Assessment This section assesses the sustainability of the fishery(s) relative to the Seafood Watch Standard for Fisheries, available at www.seafoodwatch.org. The specific standard used is referenced on the title page of all Seafood Watch assessments. Criterion 1: Impacts on the Species Under Assessment This criterion evaluates the impact of fishing mortality on the species, given its current abundance. When abundance is unknown, abundance is scored based on the species inherent vulnerability, which is calculated using a Productivity-Susceptibility Analysis. The final Criterion 1 score is determined by taking the geometric mean of the abundance and fishing mortality scores. The Criterion 1 rating is determined as follows: Score >3.2=Green or Low Concern Score >2.2 and 3.2=Yellow or Moderate Concern Score 2.2=Red or High Concern Rating is Critical if Factor 1.3 (Fishing Mortality) is Critical Guiding Principles Ensure all affected stocks are healthy and abundant. Fish all affected stocks at sustainable level. Criterion 1 Summary GREEN SEA URCHIN Region Method Abundance Fishing Mortality Score New Brunswick Diving Canada 2.33: Moderate Concern 3.00: Moderate Concern Yellow (2.640) Newfoundland and Labrador Diving Canada Nova Scotia Diving Canada 2.33: Moderate Concern 3.00: Moderate Concern Yellow (2.640) 2.33: Moderate Concern 3.00: Moderate Concern Yellow (2.644) Quebec Diving Canada 2.33: Moderate Concern 3.00: Moderate Concern Yellow (2.644) New Brunswick Towed dredges Canada British Columbia Diving Canada BC Green Urchin 2.33: Moderate Concern 3.00: Moderate Concern Yellow (2.640) 3.67: Low Concern 5.00: Low Concern Green (4.280) RED SEA URCHIN Region Method Abundance Fishing Mortality Score British Columbia Diving Canada BC Red Urchin 2.33: Moderate Concern 5.00: Low Concern Green (3.413) 12

Criterion 1 Assessment SCORING GUIDELINES Factor 1.1 - Abundance Goal: Stock abundance and size structure of native species is maintained at a level that does not impair recruitment or productivity. 5 (Very Low Concern) Strong evidence exists that the population is above an appropriate target abundance level (given the species ecological role), or near virgin biomass. 3.67 (Low Concern) Population may be below target abundance level, but is at least 75% of the target level, OR data-limited assessments suggest population is healthy and species is not highly vulnerable. 2.33 (Moderate Concern) Population is not overfished but may be below 75% of the target abundance level, OR abundance is unknown and the species is not highly vulnerable. 1 (High Concern) Population is considered overfished/depleted, a species of concern, threatened or endangered, OR abundance is unknown and species is highly vulnerable. Factor 1.2 - Fishing Mortality Goal: Fishing mortality is appropriate for current state of the stock. 5 (Low Concern) Probable (>50%) that fishing mortality from all sources is at or below a sustainable level, given the species ecological role, OR fishery does not target species and fishing mortality is low enough to not adversely affect its population. 3 (Moderate Concern) Fishing mortality is fluctuating around sustainable levels, OR fishing mortality relative to a sustainable level is uncertain. 1 (High Concern) Probable that fishing mortality from all source is above a sustainable level. GREEN SEA URCHIN Factor 1.1 - Abundance NEW BRUNSWICK, DIVING, CANADA NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR, DIVING, CANADA NOVA SCOTIA, DIVING, CANADA QUEBEC, DIVING, CANADA NEW BRUNSWICK, TOWED DREDGES, CANADA Moderate Concern Too few data are collected in the Atlantic Canada fisheries to assess the status of green sea urchin. Therefore, inherent vulnerability is estimated using the PSA. = (1.67 2 + 2.325) 2 = 2.86 (medium vulnerability). Stocks with medium vulnerability and unknown stock status are scored as a "moderate" concern. Justification: New Brunswick Managers have conducted two fisheries-independent surveys for the main areas of the New Brunswick fishery (DFO 2010 LFA36) (DFO 2010 LFA38). Total biomass in the Bay of Fundy LFA 36 appeared to have changed little between those periods (1992 to 1994 and 2002 to 2003), and though there did appear to be a decline of 13

estimated fishable biomass, the significance of the result was confounded by high uncertainty. Similar patterns for total biomass and fishable biomass was shown in the Bay of Fundy LFA 38 (survey years 1992 and 2005). The fisheries also collect CPUE data. However, CPUE is known to correlate poorly with abundance in a similar green sea urchin fishery, particularly at low stock abundances (Chen and Hunter 2003). Newfoundland and Labrador The Newfoundland and Labrador fishery only collects landings data, which are insufficient to assess the stock (DFO 2007 NL) (Pisces 2014). Nova Scotia There are no stock assessment data for the Nova Scotia fisheries (DFO 2011 SWNS) (DFO 2013 ENS). Quebec The Quebec fishery collects annual CPUE data and has conducted several fisheries-independent surveys in recent years (DFO 2012 QC). However, CPUE is known to correlate poorly with abundance in a similar green sea urchin fishery, particularly at low stock abundances (Chen and Hunter 2003), and the survey data are insufficient to estimate temporal trends. Productivity-Susceptibility Analysis PRODUCTIVITY ATTRIBUTE RELEVANT INFO REFERENCE SCORE Average age at maturity <5 years (Meidel and Scheibling 1999) 1 Average maximum age >50 years (Russell et al. 1998) 3 Fecundity >1 million eggs (Thompson 1979) 1 Reproductive strategy Broadcast spawner (Thompson 1979) 1 Trophic level <2.75 (Scheibling and Hatcher 2013) 1 Density dependence Allee effects exist (Wahle and Peckman 1999) 3 Productivity Score (P) 1.67 SUSCEPTIBILITY ATTRIBUTE Areal overlap Vertical overlap RELEVANT INFO Unknown, so default score is used (>30% across their geographic range, considering all fisheries) Green sea urchins are a targeted species, so default score used (high degree of overlap between fishing depths and depth range of species) SCORE 3 3 14

Selectivity of fishery Post-capture mortality Susceptibility Score (S) Green sea urchins are a targeted species, but gear type and size limits reduce susceptibility so default score is used (species is targeted, or is incidentally encountered AND is not likely to escape the gear, BUT conditions under "high risk" do not apply). Green sea urchins are the targeted species, so the default score is used (retained species, or majority dead when released, or unknown). 2 3 2.325 Factor 1.2 - Fishing Mortality NEW BRUNSWICK, DIVING, CANADA NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR, DIVING, CANADA NOVA SCOTIA, DIVING, CANADA QUEBEC, DIVING, CANADA NEW BRUNSWICK, TOWED DREDGES, CANADA Moderate Concern A paucity of data collection and reference points means fishing mortality relative to a sustainable level is unknown, a "moderate" concern. New Brunswick The most recent estimates of fishing mortality, based on 2005 population surveys, were 7.9% in LFA 36 and 1.5% in LFA 38, but the fishery has no reference points (DFO 2010 LFA36) (DFO 2010 LFA38). Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia Fishing mortality in the Newfoundland and Labrador, and Nova Scotia fisheries is unknown. Quebec Calculations based on a 2010/2011 urchin biomass survey estimated fishing mortality at 12 to 19% in Area 8 and at 5% in Area 9 (DFO 2012 QC), but the fishery has no reference points. GREEN SEA URCHIN Factor 1.1 - Abundance BRITISH COLUMBIA, DIVING, CANADA, BC GREEN URCHIN Low Concern The British Columbia fishery conducts fishery-independent surveys of sea urchin biomass and size frequency at index sites in both fishing regions. Stock assessments are updated every 3 years, with the last published in 15

2016. CPUE from the fishery and fishery-independent biomass surveys are both used in stock assessment models, which produce estimates of MSY but not B MSY. Stock biomass and abundance of green sea urchins in both regions exhibit stable or increasing trends over the past 7 to 8 years. Changes in population size frequency and mean urchin size have been observed due to strong recruitment, but there are no indications of declines in large individuals. Legal-sized biomass density at a fished index site is 45% of the density at two comparable unfished sites (DFO 2016 IFMP). Although the fishery does not have a full quantitative stock assessment (with B MSY), the species is not highly vulnerable; multiple data-limited stock indicators suggest the stock is healthy, so abundance is scored as "low" concern. Justification: Figure 5 Biomass trends for index sites in the Northeast Vancouver Island (left) and Southeast Vancouver Island fishing regions of the British Columbia green sea urchin fishery. Figure 6 Biomass density of a fished site, in comparison to two unfished sites in the British Columbia green sea urchin fishery. 16

Factor 1.2 - Fishing Mortality BRITISH COLUMBIA, DIVING, CANADA, BC GREEN URCHIN Low Concern DFO uses the model-estimated MSY as the limit reference point (LRP) for fishing mortality. Quotas are defined by target reference points (TRP), which are set as a percent reduction of MSY. Currently, quotas are at <60% of model-estimated MSY for the northeast region and <40% of model-estimated MSY for the southeast region. DFO estimates that these quotas correspond to a 2.5% probability of exceeding the true MSY for the fishery. Quotas are generally revised every 3 years and were last updated in 2016 (DFO 2016 IFMP) (DFO 2016 BC Stock). Because fishing mortality is very likely to be below a sustainable level in this fishery, it is scored as "low" concern. RED SEA URCHIN Factor 1.1 - Abundance BRITISH COLUMBIA, DIVING, CANADA, BC RED URCHIN Moderate Concern DFO conducts fisheries-independent surveys of stock biomass at index sites. Stocks appear to be stable, with fisheries-independent surveys showing no significant decrease in populations at the two index sites representing the most heavily fished areas (harvest rates at almost 100% TAC; pers. comm., D. Leus 2018). Biomass reference points do not exist for the fishery (DFO 2016). The red sea urchin is not a highly vulnerable species, based on productivity-susceptibility analysis. Abundance is scored as "moderate" concern because the target species is not highly vulnerable, but there is insufficient data to assess stock abundance relative to a reference point. Justification: Productivity-Susceptibility Analysis (Inherent Vulnerability) Vulnerability (V) = 2.86 (Medium) PRODUCTIVITY ATTRIBUTE VALUE REFERENCE SCORE Average age at maturity 1 to 2 years (Kato and Schroeter 1985) 1 Average maximum age >100 years (Ebert 2003) 3 Fecundity >1 million eggs (Kalvass and Rogers-Bennett 2001) 1 Reproductive strategy Broadcast spawner (Kalvass and Rogers-Bennett 2001) 1 Trophic level <2.75 (Rogers-Bennett 2013) 1 Density dependence Allee effects exist (Lundquist and Botsford 2011) 3 Productivity Score 1.67 17

SUSCEPTIBILITY ATTRIBUTE Areal overlap Vertical overlap Selectivity of fishery Post-capture mortality Susceptibility Score RELEVANT INFORMATION Unknown, so default score is used (>30% across their geographic range, considering all fisheries) Red sea urchins are a targeted species, so default score used (high degree of overlap between fishing depths and depth range of species) Red sea urchins are a targeted species, but gear type and size limits reduce susceptibility so default score is used (pescies is targeted, or is incidentally encountered AND is not likely to escape the gear, BUT conditions under "high risk" do not apply) Red sea urchins are the targeted species, so the default score is used (retained species, or majority dead when released, or unknown) SCORE 3 3 2 3 2.325 Factor 1.2 - Fishing Mortality BRITISH COLUMBIA, DIVING, CANADA, BC RED URCHIN Low Concern DFO uses a modified surplus production model to estimate MSY. A target reference point (in the form of a TAC) is estimated as a fraction of MSY. TAC is 2 to 3% of legal biomass. Time-series data from two index sites indicate that this level of fishing mortality has been sustainable over a decade (DFO 2016). Fishing mortality is scored as "low" concern because it is probable that fishing mortality is at or below a sustainable level. 18

Criterion 2: Impacts on Other Species All main retained and bycatch species in the fishery are evaluated under Criterion 2. Seafood Watch defines bycatch as all fisheries-related mortality or injury to species other than the retained catch. Examples include discards, endangered or threatened species catch, and ghost fishing. Species are evaluated using the same guidelines as in Criterion 1. When information on other species caught in the fishery is unavailable, the fishery s potential impacts on other species is scored according to the Unknown Bycatch Matrices, which are based on a synthesis of peer-reviewed literature and expert opinion on the bycatch impacts of each gear type. The fishery is also scored for the amount of non-retained catch (discards) and bait use relative to the retained catch. To determine the final Criterion 2 score, the score for the lowest scoring retained/bycatch species is multiplied by the discard/bait score. The Criterion 2 rating is determined as follows: Score >3.2=Green or Low Concern Score >2.2 and =3.2=Yellow or Moderate Concern Score =2.2=Red or High Concern Rating is Critical if Factor 2.3 (Fishing Mortality) is Crtitical Guiding Principles Ensure all affected stocks are healthy and abundant. Fish all affected stocks at sustainable level. Minimize bycatch. Criterion 2 Summary Only the lowest scoring main species is/are listed in the table and text in this Criterion 2 section; a full list and assessment of the main species can be found in Appendix A. GREEN SEA URCHIN - BRITISH COLUMBIA - DIVING - CANADA - BC GREEN URCHIN Subscore: 5.000 Discard Rate: 1.00 C2 Rate: 5.000 Species Abundance Fishing Mortality Subscore No other main species caught GREEN SEA URCHIN - NEW BRUNSWICK - DIVING - CANADA Subscore: 5.000 Discard Rate: 1.00 C2 Rate: 5.000 Species Abundance Fishing Mortality Subscore No other main species caught GREEN SEA URCHIN - NEW BRUNSWICK - TOWED DREDGES - CANADA Subscore: 3.410 Discard Rate: 0.75 C2 Rate: 2.557 Species Abundance Fishing Mortality Subscore Sugar kelp 2.33:Moderate Concern 5.00:Low Concern Green (3.410) 19

GREEN SEA URCHIN - NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR - DIVING - CANADA Subscore: 5.000 Discard Rate: 1.00 C2 Rate: 5.000 Species Abundance Fishing Mortality Subscore No other main species caught GREEN SEA URCHIN - NOVA SCOTIA - DIVING - CANADA Subscore: 5.000 Discard Rate: 1.00 C2 Rate: 5.000 Species Abundance Fishing Mortality Subscore No other main species caught GREEN SEA URCHIN - QUEBEC - DIVING - CANADA Subscore: 5.000 Discard Rate: 1.00 C2 Rate: 5.000 Species Abundance Fishing Mortality Subscore No other main species caught RED SEA URCHIN - BRITISH COLUMBIA - DIVING - CANADA - BC RED URCHIN Subscore: 5.000 Discard Rate: 1.00 C2 Rate: 5.000 Species Abundance Fishing Mortality Subscore No other main species caught The diver-based fisheries are selective and no other species are caught. According to DFO, efforts are underway to better understand the impacts of discards in the New Brunswick drag fishery, including urchin survivability (see Criterion 3.3) (pers. comm., DFO August 2018). In the meantime, the present assessment uses the best available data on discards, which is a study based on observer data from trips conducted in 2007 and 2008 (DFO 2010 LFA38). At that time, urchins accounted for over 90% of the catch (excluding kelp). Roughly half of the sea urchin catch is discarded (48% during Dec 2007 trips, and 55% during the Jan 2008 trips) (DFO does consider the estimates out of date, since the rate has not been calculated in recent years). Sea urchins are assessed under Criterion 1. Other taxa caught included kelp, blue mussels, various crab species (including rock and Jonah crabs), various fish species (including winter flounder), and other benthic invertebrates (including scallops and unidentified shrimps). All except kelp were caught in relatively low volumes (<1% of the catch when kelp is excluded except for blue mussels at 3.7 to 4.9%), and none are of particular conservation concern so are not included further in this assessment. Kelp bycatch by weight can be significant (14.1% during the Jan 2008 trips and 36.2% during the Dec 2007 trips) and appears to be a combination of drift or wrack material and attached plants that are pulled off the bottom by the drag. According to DFO, while repeated dragging over the same kelp bed could reduce kelp density, this is more than compensated for by removing the urchin grazing pressure through fishing (DFO 2010 LFA38). In short, kelp is included in the assessment for the New Brunswick drag fishery and does drive the C2 score for 20

that fishery. This approach reflects the uncertainty in the impacts on kelp and other species, given that current data are out of date and dredge fisheries frequently have significant bycatch concerns (as reflected in the Seafood Watch Standard for Fisheries, Unknown Bycatch Matrices, Appendix 3). Statistics on the percent of the by-catch in observed LFA 38 sea urchin fishing trips for each species during the week of 17 21 December 2007 (5 trips), and the week of 7 11 January 2008 (5 trips). From (DFO 2010 LFA38). 17 21 Dec. 2007 7 11 Jan. 2008 Catch (Kg) Percent of Catch (with Kelp) Percent of Catch (no Kelp) Catch (Kg) Percent of Catch (with Kelp) Percent of Catch (no Kelp) Total Weekly Catch Total Weekly Catch (No Kelp) 16876 15296 100% 10772 100% 13134 100% 100% Sea Urchins Discarded Sea Urchins Kept 4729 28.0% 43.9% 6772 44.3% 51.6% 5071 30.0% 47.1% 5487 35.9% 41.8% Blue Mussel 524 3.1% 4.9% 489 3.2% 3.7% Ocean Pout 3 0.02% 0.03% 2 0.01% 0.01% Green Crab 90 0.5% 0.8% 47 0.3% 0.4% Hermit Crab 99 0.6% 0.9% 99 0.6% 0.8% Hyas coarctatus 0 0.0% 0.0% 4 0.0% 0.0% Jonah Crab 4 0.0% 0.0% 41 0.3% 0.3% Lumpfish 1 0.0% 0.0% 1 0.0% 0.0% Rock Crab 58 0.3% 0.5% 29 0.2% 0.2% Sabinea sp. 0 0.0% 0.0% 84 0.6% 0.6% Sand Lance 0 0.0% 0.0% 5 0.0% 0.0% Scallop 22 0.1% 0.2% 0 0.0% 0.0% Sculpin 52 0.3% 0.5% 12 0.1% 0.1% Sea Mouse 3 0.0% 0.0% 4 0.0% 0.0% Sea Raven 8 0.0% 0.1% 0 0.0% 0.0% 21

Seaweed (Kelp) 6104 36.2% 2162 14.1% Shrimp 92 0.5% 0.9% 47 0.3% 0.4% Winter Flounder 16 0.1% 0.1% 12 0.1% 0.1% Criterion 2 Assessment SCORING GUIDELINES Factor 2.1 - Abundance (same as Factor 1.1 above) Factor 2.2 - Fishing Mortality (same as Factor 1.2 above) SUGAR KELP Factor 2.1 - Abundance NEW BRUNSWICK, TOWED DREDGES, CANADA Moderate Concern No information is available on the status of kelp in New Brunswick waters, but Laminariads are fast growing, broadcast-spawning, short-lived perennials (http://www.ukmarinesac.org.uk/communities/infralittoral/ik3_2.htm). We were unable to find evidence of any significant directed harvest of kelp off the Maritimes. Population status is therefore considered unknown and a "moderate" concern. Factor 2.2 - Fishing Mortality NEW BRUNSWICK, TOWED DREDGES, CANADA Low Concern According to DFO, while repeated dragging over the same kelp bed could reduce kelp density, this is more than compensated for by removing the urchin grazing pressure through fishing (DFO 2010 LFA38). Factor 2.3 - Modifying Factor: Discards and Bait Use Goal: Fishery optimizes the utilization of marine and freshwater resources by minimizing post-harvest loss. For fisheries that use bait, bait is used efficiently. Scoring Guidelines: The discard rate is the sum of all dead discards (i.e. non-retained catch) plus bait use divided by the total retained catch. 22

RATIO OF BAIT + DISCARDS/LANDINGS FACTOR 2.3 SCORE <100% 1 >=100 0.75 NEW BRUNSWICK, TOWED DREDGES, CANADA 100% Limited data from at-sea observers indicate that sea urchin discards to landings were between 93% and 125%. Discards may consist of sublegal sea urchins and those with poor gonad quality. The survival of discarded live sea urchins is unknown (DFO 2010 LFA38). Because the discard-landings ratio may exceed 100%, the fishery receives a score of 0.75. 23

Criterion 3: Management ness Five factors are evaluated in Criterion 3: Management Strategy and Implementation, Bycatch Strategy, Scientific Research/Monitoring, Enforcement of Regulations, and Inclusion of Stakeholders. Each is scored as either highly effective, moderately effective, ineffective, or critical. The final Criterion 3 score is determined as follows: 5 (Very Low Concern) Meets the standards of highly effective for all five factors considered. 4 (Low Concern) Meets the standards of highly effective for management strategy and implementation and at least moderately effective for all other factors. 3 (Moderate Concern) Meets the standards for at least moderately effective for all five factors. 2 (High Concern) At a minimum, meets standards for moderately effective for Management Strategy and Implementation and Bycatch Strategy, but at least one other factor is rated ineffective. 1 (Very High Concern) Management Strategy and Implementation and/or Bycatch Management are ineffective. 0 (Critical) Management Strategy and Implementation is critical. The Criterion 3 rating is determined as follows: Score >3.2=Green or Low Concern Score >2.2 and 3.2=Yellow or Moderate Concern Score 2.2 = Red or High Concern Rating is Critical if Management Strategy and Implementation is Critical. GUIDING PRINCIPLE The fishery is managed to sustain the long-term productivity of all impacted species. Criterion 3 Summary Fishery Fishery 1: British Columbia Diving Canada BC Green Urchin Fishery 2: British Columbia Diving Canada BC Red Urchin Fishery 3: New Brunswick Diving Canada Fishery 4: New Brunswick Towed dredges Canada Fishery 5: Newfoundland and Labrador Diving Canada Management Strategy Highly Highly Moderately Moderately Moderately Bycatch Strategy Highly Highly Highly Moderately Highly Research and Monitoring Highly Highly Ineffective Ineffective Ineffective Enforcement Highly Highly Highly Highly Moderately Stakeholder Inclusion Highly Highly Moderately Moderately Highly Score Green (5.000) Green (5.000) Red (2.000) Red (2.000) Red (2.000) 24

Fishery 6: Nova Scotia Diving Canada Moderately Highly Ineffective Highly Moderately Red (2.000) Fishery 7: Quebec Diving Canada Moderately Highly Moderately Highly Moderately Yellow (3.000) Criterion 3 Assessment Factor 3.1 - Management Strategy and Implementation Considerations: What type of management measures are in place? Are there appropriate management goals, and is there evidence that management goals are being met? Do manages follow scientific advice? To achieve a highly effective rating, there must be appropriately defined management goals, precautionary policies that are based on scientific advice, and evidence that the measures in place have been successful at maintaining/rebuilding species. BRITISH COLUMBIA, DIVING, CANADA, BC GREEN URCHIN BRITISH COLUMBIA, DIVING, CANADA, BC RED URCHIN Highly The British Columbia green and red sea urchin fisheries operate and are assessed and managed at different spatial scales due to logistics and market demand, rather than any conservation concerns (DFO 2016) (DFO 2016 IFMP). The green urchin fishery is limited-entry. Management defines harvest reference points based on stock modelestimated MSY. These are operationalized in the form of annual total allowable catch (TAC), which are divided into individual quotas among license holders. Fisheries-independent biomass/population surveys are conducted regularly (every 2 to 3 years) and used to revise reference points and quota options. Quotas are generally reviewed every 3 years. There is some evidence that management is effective: stock abundances are stable or increasing, and population size structure is being maintained (DFO 2016 IFMP) (DFO 2016 BC Stock). Management strategy and implementation in this fishery is scored as "highly effective" because there are appropriate targets and management strategies that are based on scientific advice, and there is evidence of effectiveness. The red urchin fishery is larger than the green urchin fishery and is assessed and managed differently. The fishery does not have biomass reference points. Management specifically aims to maintain current levels of sea urchin biomass. This is a limited-entry fishery. Fishing mortality is controlled through TAC, which is set using fishery-independent biomass survey data and a surplus production model. TACs are reviewed and set annually. Size limits on harvested individuals are designed to be precautionary and allow mature individuals to spawn for several years before entering the fishery; market preferences also provide some de facto protection for the largest (>14 cm) and most fecund individuals. DFO considers this "reserve" of sublegal and very large individuals as an additional buffer in managing the fishery. Time-series data from two index sites suggest that harvesting at close to 100% of quota has been sustainable (DFO 2016). Management strategy and implementation in this fishery is scored as "highly effective" because there are appropriate targets and management strategies that are based on scientific advice, and there is evidence of effectiveness. 25

NEW BRUNSWICK, DIVING, CANADA NEW BRUNSWICK, TOWED DREDGES, CANADA NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR, DIVING, CANADA NOVA SCOTIA, DIVING, CANADA QUEBEC, DIVING, CANADA Moderately Sea urchin fisheries in Atlantic Canada are managed with a mix of measures designed to limit effort or protect the stock, but their overall effectiveness is uncertain. Justification: New Brunswick This is a limited-entry fishery. The fishery uses annual quotas to control fishing mortality, though these are based on dated population assessments (1992 to 1994 diver surveys). DFO monitors CPUE annually, and has implemented multiple reductions in TAC in response to CPUE decreases in one fishing zone (A38). Any overage in TAC is subtracted for the next year's TAC. There are also areas closed to harvesting, that are expected to protect reproductive stock (DFO 2010a) (DFO 2010b). However, the most recent assessment of LFA 36 indicated that the TAC may allow a harvest rate that exceeds the rate approved in 1996, and no change in TAC has taken place since that assessment (see Scientific Research and Monitoring below). Because there are insufficient data on stock abundance, the effectiveness of management is uncertain (DFO 2010a) (DFO 2010b). Newfoundland and Labrador This is a relatively new commercial fishery and does not currently have an integrated fisheries management plan in place. It is a limited-entry fishery and is primarily managed through area licensing, a limited harvest season, and minimum size limits. There are no measures in place to explicitly control fishing mortality. No stock assessment information is available for the fishery (Pisces 2014). Nova Scotia This is a limited-entry fishery and is managed through a limited harvest season and a minimum size limit. Licensing is either by area (county) or by exclusive harvest zones for some license holders (DFO 2011 SWNS) (DFO 2013 ENS). Some local scale management may occur within individual exclusive harvest zones (Miller and Nolan 2008), but there are no specific measures in place to control fishing mortality and there are no stock assessment data available for the fisheries. Some areas are closed to harvesting, which are expected to protect reproductive stock (DFO 2017), though a possible consequence could be heavier fishery pressure in open areas. Quebec This is a limited-entry fishery. Because there are insufficient data to directly estimate fishing mortality, fishery management focuses primarily on controlling fishing effort. In area 9, a limited number of fishing days are allotted for each harvesting license, with a catch limit per fishing day. ness is mostly unknown. CPUE is monitored, but it may not be a good correlate of stock abundance for urchin fisheries (Chen and Hunter 2003). 26

Factor 3.2 - Bycatch Strategy Considerations: What type of management strategy/measures are in place to reduce the impacts of the fishery on bycatch species and when applicable, to minimize ghost fishing? How successful are these management measures? To achieve a Highly rating, the fishery must have no or low bycatch, or if there are bycatch or ghost fishing concerns, there must be effective measures in place to minimize impacts. BRITISH COLUMBIA, DIVING, CANADA, BC GREEN URCHIN BRITISH COLUMBIA, DIVING, CANADA, BC RED URCHIN NEW BRUNSWICK, DIVING, CANADA NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR, DIVING, CANADA NOVA SCOTIA, DIVING, CANADA QUEBEC, DIVING, CANADA Highly Harvest of sea urchins by divers on SCUBA is highly selective and produces minimal or no bycatch of nontarget species. Because there is no bycatch or other species landed, bycatch strategy in these fisheries is scored as "highly effective." NEW BRUNSWICK, TOWED DREDGES, CANADA Moderately Available data suggest there are no particular concerns (at the population level) with bycatch in the fishery; however, the fishery is not highly selective (total discards and bycatch species including kelp is >50% of the catch (see Criterion 2). No measures are in place currently to reduce these impacts. Furthermore, DFO considers the available data out of date and plans on improving the monitoring program in the coming years (see Criterion 3.3). This is key to understanding the need for bycatch mitigation measures (of which there are currently none), especially given that bycatch impacts in dredge fisheries is often significant (see the Unknown Bycatch Matrices in Appendix 2 of the Seafood Watch Standard for Fisheries). The licence conditions for the drag fishery, which specify that scallop dredges may not be used, and that sea urchin dredges are limited in size, may also reduce bycatch impacts: "They are only authorized to fish for sea urchins with sea urchin drag gear. This gear is defined as a type of bottom-contact mobile gear towed in the sea by a vessel and that consists of a bag like net of steel meshes and twine meshed, having a maximum width steel frame opening of 1.8 meters (6 feet), with a mouth opening of 10 inches, and the bottom of the drag consisting of a maximum of 3/8 hardened chain to form a chain sweep, and the top of the drag consisting of twine running back to a cod end." (pers. comm., DFO Aug 2018). Until further data are available, bycatch management is scored "moderately effective." Factor 3.3 - Scientific Research and Monitoring Considerations: How much and what types of data are collected to evaluate the fishery s impact on the species? Is there adequate monitoring of bycatch? To achieve a Highly rating, regular, robust population assessments must be conducted for target or retained species, and an adequate bycatch data collection program must be in place to ensure bycatch management goals are met. BRITISH COLUMBIA, DIVING, CANADA, BC GREEN URCHIN BRITISH COLUMBIA, DIVING, CANADA, BC RED URCHIN Highly Management makes use of fishery-independent diver surveys of red and green sea urchin populations, biomass, and size structure, as well as fishery-dependent data like CPUE, which is collected more frequently. 27