State of California The Resources.Cigency

State of California The Resources.Cigency DE~AhrMENT Of FISH A\U GAME bjulo(ji(':\l CHARACTEl-dSTICS OF THE CATCH FJ-«)~~ THE \:~0-~Jl t-).\clfic HERHII\(, CLlf'E \ t'-\ll\si, Ru}. FISHER) \ CALlH!R\l!\ ejerome lj. Spratt ~Ah \ E h' ESUl'fH.'ES D I \' IS. 0\ Admjnjstr.<:ltjye Eeport ".jo. \:-5 l!('c 'ltiber l~~l

BIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CATCH FROM THE 990-9 PACIFIC HERRING, CLUPEA PALLASI, ROE FISHERY IN CALIFORNIA / by Jerome D. Spratt Z/ ABSTRACT The Tomales-Bodega Bay catch during the past two seasons has been from the northern part of Bodega Ba~Y, due to the closure of the Tomales Bay fishery. In the Tomales-Bodega Bay area, -, 5-, and 6-yr-old herring Clupea pallasi, comprised 79% by number of the 990-9 season's gill net catch. The number of -yr olds (987 year class) increased to % of the gill net catch. Four-yr olds are an indicator of recruitment strength into the gill net fishery. Average length of herring in the Tomales-Bodega Bay area gill net catch decreased due to a shift to younger herring in the catch, as well as, poor growth characteristics during 990.. Herring age and size data obtained from Tomales Bay with a variable mesh research gill net were similar to data from San Francisco Bay obtained with the same net. All age classes were taken and herring ranged in length from 8 mm to 6 mm. In San Francisco Bay, the age composition of the gill net catch was also primarily -, 5-, and 6-yr-old herring, which comprised 79% of the catch. In the round haul fishery - and. -yr-old herring dominated, comprising 7% of the catch. The average length of herring in the San Francisco Bay gill net and round haul catches decreased. Both are the lowest recorded average lengths ~y the respective gear types except for the 98-8 El Nino season. Observed poor growth characteristics this season are attributed to reduced upwelling off central California in 990. / Marine Resources Administrative Report No. 9-5 ~I Marine Resources Division, 0 Garden Road, Monterey, California 9Y0. i

- - _. +. ~.~._~~... _ -' _._~ ~"" -~..._&.-.- ~- -- - -- -'-"'~-' ~_ '- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I want to thank Heather Barrett, Karen Haberman, and Fred Smith for collecting and processing herring during the season. Tom Moore, Northern Ocean Management Area Biologist at Bodega Bay, provided invaluable assistance during the season. ii

.'--" INTRODUCTION The Department began monitoring the age, size, and sex composition of the Pacific herring, Clupea pallasi, roe fishery catch in Tomales and San Francisco Bays in 97. Spratt (98, 98, 98, 98, 985, 986, 987, 988, 989a, and 990) reported on data collected by sampling the herring roe fishery." from 97 through 990. This report continues the seasonal series of reports through the 990-9 season. METHODS Catch Sampling 0' Herring catch sampling in San Francisco Bay reverted back to methods used through the 986-87 season. Both San Francisco Bay gill net and round haul catch samples were collected at dockside after vessels unloaded. Sampling by mid-water trawl from prespawning herring aggregations used since the 986-87 season, was precluded by staff reductions. However, dockside round haul catch sampling and trawl sampling can be used interchangably to determine true age composition of a given herring school, because all age classes are fully selected by the two gears. In the Tomales-Bodega Bay area, herring were collected at off-loading sites in Bodega Harbor. In San Francisco Bay, herring were collected at Sausalito and San Francisco. Up to four samples (one per boat) were taken per day in each bay, when herring were available. If both gill net and round haul catches were available for sampling on the same day, two gill net and two round haul samples were collected. Each sample weighed. kg and was collected from bins or totes, after vessels unloaded.

, ~ - _... _,,--._. -.~..a.-_....-... -------.----.-- _.-- -_.- - ----- Tomales/Bodega Bay samples were frozen, while San Francisco Bay samples were processed in a fresh condition. Laboratory procedures have remained unchanged since the fishery began in 97 (Spratt 98). A.0 kg subsample was randomly selected for processing. Every fish in the subsample was weighed to the nearest 0. g, measured in body length (BL) to the nearest millimeter, and sex and maturity were determined. Body length was used as the unit of measurement because the fleshy caudal peduncle of herring makes the hypural plate difficult to locate. Body length was measured from the tip of the snout to the end of the silvery part of the body. Otoliths were removed for age determination and stored in gelatin capsules. Ages were assigned by the author using previously determined criteria (Spratt 98); otoliths were read at least twice before final age determinations ""ere made. Variable Mesh Research Gill Net Under current regulations, Tomales Bay is closed to herring fishing until spawning biomass recovers to,000 tons. In lieu of a fishery, a variable mesh monofilament nylon set gill net was used to collect fish for age composition analysis. The gill net was composed of five 0 ft. panels, each with a different mesh size (.5,.75,.0,.5, and.5 in. mesh). All herring captured were measured to the nearest millimeter, and stratified by mesh size. However, for the first time an agelength key was used to estimate age composition in Tomales Bay. Seventeen herring from each 0 mm size category were taken for aging, using the method developed by Reilly and Moore (985).

== -==~== RESULTS Tomales Bay A total of 9 herring from 6 samples was collected and processed this season. An Composition This season's age composition was based on 6 herring. Three herring had otoliths that could not be aged. The dominant age groups this season were through 6-yr-old herring, comprising 79% by number and 7% by weight of the Tomales/Bodega Bay area gill net catch (Table ). Including 7-yr-old herring, these age groups comprised over 9% of the catch. The number of -yr-ol~ herring, an indicator of recruitment, increased to % of the catch by number (Table ). Length Composition This is the first season that herring samples from Tomales Bay were frozen before processing. Reilly and Hoore (98) determined that herring shrink when they are frozen, and added a correction factor to length measurements. Five mm were added to herring length measurements this season, that approximates Reilly and Moore's correction factor. After correcting length measurements, the average length of herring in the 990-9 gill net catch decreased 7 mm to 97 mm (Table ). The length of through 6-yr-old herring (Table ) also decreased an average of mm from the 989-90 season (Spratt 990) This coupled with the shift to more - and -yr-old herring in the 990-9 catch (5%) compared with the 989-90 season (%) resulted in the decrease in the overall mean length.

~--. ---- - _... ".~ _.. ~_._'- - '.."..'- ---~.. Weight Composition The mean weights-at-age of the three dominant age groups in this season's catch from the Tomales-Bodega Bay area were to 8 g below the long term mean (Table ). The weights-at-age of older age groups were above average, and the combined unweighted mean weight for the season did not change significantly (Table ). Sex Ratio The female to male number and biomass lweight) ratios of the 990-9 Tomales-Bodega Bay area catch were nearly equal (Table 5). The percent of females in the catch was 6% by number and 66% by weight. Catch sex ratios over 60% female are high, and indicate good roe recovery during the season. Variable Mesh Research Gill Net Due to the depressed Tomales Bay spawning biomass and small school sizes in the bay, herring were difficult to catch. However, on January 7, 99, we were successful in obtaining a gill net sample. A total of 5 herring were captured, and 5 herring between 8 mm and 6 mm were taken for aging. The dominant age class was -yr-olds comprising % of the sample by number (Table 6). All age classes ( through 9) and a typical size range of herring were taken. The relatively low number of -yr-old herring could be due to poor recruitment, but is probably due to the time the sample was taken. Younger herring are more prevalent later in the spawning season. In San Francisco Bay, -yr-old herring also dominated variable mesh gill net samples. There were also other similarities with San Francisco Bay. The mean lengths of herring from Tomales Bay stratified by mesh size were 65mm, 80 mm,

'.. 98 mm, and 07 mm (.5 and.5 in. mesh were combined). Three years of data from San Francisco Bay for the same mesh sizes were 6 mm, 80 mm, 9 mm, and 06 mm (Reilly and Hoore 985). San Francisco Bay A total of 57 gill net samples totalling 59 herring, and 9 round haul samples totalling 5 herring were collected this season. Age Composition The 98-85 season was the first full season in which -/8 in. minimum mesh was allowed in the San Francisco Bay gill net fishery. Since then, -, 5-, and 6-yr-olds have been the dominant age groups in the gill net catch (Table 7). In the 989-90 season, there was a increase in the number of 6- and 7-yr-old herring in the San Francisco Bay gill net catch. This was the last significant catch from strong year classes recruited from 98 to 985. In the 990-9 season, the age composition reverted back to primarily -, 5-, and 6-yr-old herring, which comprised 79% by number of the gill net catch (Table 7). This is the first season that the round haul catch has been sampled only at dockside since the 986-87 season. Two and -yr-old herring were the dominant age groups comprising % and 0% respectively by number of the round haul catch (Table 8). Again this season, very few herring over 6-yrs-old were taken in the round haul catch. A Chi-square test of independence was applied to the percentage age composition of this season's round haul catch and 5

previous seasons data (Table 8). The 990-9 season percentage age.composition (- through 8-yr olds) was not significantly different (Chi-square = 7.6 with 5 d.f. at the 5% significance level). Length Composition In the 989-90 gill net catch, the mean lengths of through 7-yr olds decreased from to mm (Spratt 990). There was no change in length at age this season (Table 9). However, the mean length of the gill net catch declined to 9 mm, the smallest recorded mean length for the gill net catch (Table ). This was caused by an increase in the proportion of -yr-old herring in the catch at a time when the mean length of most age groups was below average. The mean length of the round haul catch was 7 mid, lowest mean since the 98-8 El Nino season (Table ). the The mean length of herring - to 6-yrs-old (Table 0) was mm below the long-term mean for these five age classes. Weight Composition The overall weight composition of the San Francisco Bay gill net catch (Table 7) normally parallels that of the age composit- ion. The gill net catch was predominantly - through 7-yr-old \ herring which comprised 89% by weight of the catch. The mean weight of herring, unweighted for year class strength, in the San Francisco Bay gill net catch (Table ), decreased to 5 g the lowest mean weight since 98-8. The weight-at-age of herring in the round haul catch (Table ) was also below long-term mean levels. 6

, -_.------ Sex Ratio The sex ratio of the San Francisco Bay gill net catch improved this season (Table 5), females composed 6% by number and 6% by weight of the catch. The sex ratio of the round haul catch was 57% female by number and 60% by weight. DISCUSSION Tomales Bay Spawning escapement in Tomales Bay declined to a low of 67 tons in the 988-89 season (Spratt 989b). historic Since then, spawning escapement has been increasing and reached nearly 800 tons in the 990-9 season (Spratt 99). During this time, Tomales Bay has been closed to herring fishing, and catch data have been taken from the Bodega Bay herring fishery. However, it is possible that herring caught in Bodega Bay may be from a separate stock and that catch data from the past three seasons may not be representative of Tomales Bay herring. However, no comparative fishery data were available from Tomales Bay to evaluate this possibility. There was an increase in the number of -yr-old herring in this season's Bodega Bay catch. These -yr-old herring (987 year class) may be from the last good season in Tomales Bay when nearly 5,000 tons of herring spawned in 986-87. The Tomales Bay spawning population is beginning to recover, but the mechanism responsible for the recovery is unknown. Relatively good recruitment could be responsible for the increase in spawning biomass. At a time when the population is extremely depressed, any increase in recruitment would have a pronounced 7

..k _-..-_....~_.. ~...._.-_... - '_ ""---- effect on biomass. It could also be due to movement of herring from other spawning areas to Tomales/Bodega Bay. This would be the first indication that herring are returning to Tomales Bay in large numbers. Either of these scenarios is a possibility, but without a fishery it is difficult to assess which is more probable. This season's variable mesh gill net samples provided the first age and size composition data from Tomales Bay in three years. The data gives some ~nsight into what has happened to the Tomales Bay stock. The same research gill net has been used in San Francisco Bay, and there is a strong similarity in the age. and size composition between samples from both bays. Since the San Francisco Bay herring stock is considered to be healthy, these data suggest that the Tomales Bay biomass has not declined from recruitment failure or overfishing. The data support the contention that herring have abandoned Tomales Bay. A sudden return to a near normal biomass level is unlikely because herring that had a genetic link to Tomales Bay (from previous good seasons) have been removed from the population by natural mortality. The recent increase in the Tomales Bay population appears to be due to a gradual return of herring, with schools composed of normal age and size groups. San Francisco Bay The San Francisco Bay herring spawning biomass declined 0% this season to 5,000 tons, the first significant decline in seven years (Spratt 99). Recruitment of -yr-old herring (989 year class) was relatively good this season, comprising % of the round haul catch. However, the 989 year class may be rela-

tively weaker than previous strong year classes because the population level is at a six year low. The age composition of the gill net catch shifted from 5-, 6, and 7-yr olds to primarily -, 5-, and 6-yr-old herring. The strong year classes from 98 through 985 have passed through the fishery and no longer contribute significantly to the catch. The age composition of the gill net catch is not expected to change significantly until another strong year class is recruited, or there is an effective change in gill net mesh size. The minimum legal mesh size is /8 in.; however, smaller mesh nets are commonly used in the fishery. Gill nets constructed of light monofilament nylon will stretch when measured. Consequently, a gill net that is in. mesh will pass a /8 in. net gauge and be considered legal. From a practical standpoint, the current /8 in. minimum mesh regulation ( in. mesh in practice) is effective in preventing the take of -yr-old herring, and meets the Department's management goal of allowing herring to spawn twice before entering the gill net catch. CONCLUSION The Tomales Bay herring spawning biomass has doubled in each of the ~ast two seasons. However, the 990-9 spawning biomass of nearly 800 tons is still below historic levels of 5000-6000 tons. The Tomales Bay fishery is closed, but age and size composition data from variable mesh research nets indicate a movement of older herring to Tomales Bay, rather than exceptionally good recruitment. The increase in spawning biomass is encouraging; but, the Tomales Bay fishery should remain closed until spawning 9

r-----:---~----_:_:._. _... escapement reaches at least.000 tons. The San Francisco Bay herring population has declined twice. since the start of the roe fishery probably in reaction to warmer than normal ocean temperatures off central California that affected primary productivity. The 990 warm-water event was not as pronounced as the 98-8 El Nino, but the effect on the San Francisco Bay herring population was similar. Oceanic conditions during 99 that affect growth and survival of herring will probably determine whether herring biomass increases or decreases next season. Early indications are that 99 oceanic conditions have improved and this should be beneficial to herring. 0

REFERENCES Reilly, P.N. and T.O. Moore 98. Pacific herring, Clupea harengus pallasi, studies in San Francisco Bay, December 98 to March 98. Calif. Fish and Game, Mar. Resources Admin. Rept. 8-8:-. Reilly, P.N. and T.O. Moore 985. Pacific herring, Clupea harengus pallasi, studies in San Francisco Bay and the Gulf of the Farallones, June 98 to Harch 985. Calif. Fish and Game, Mar. Recources Admin. Rept. 85-:-7. Spratt, J.D. 98. Status of the Pacific herring Clupea harengus pallasi, in California to 980. Calif. Fish and Game, Fish Bull. 7:-0. 98. Biological characteristics of the catch from the 980-8 and 98-8 Pacific herring, Clupea harengus pallasi, roe fishery in California. Calif. Fish and Game, Mar. Resources Admin. Rept. 8-0:-6. 98. Biological characteristics of the catch from the 98-8 Pacific herring, Clupea harengus pallasi, roe fishery in California. Calif. Fish and Game, Har. Resources Admin. Rept. 8-:-. 98. Biological characteristics of the catch from the 98-8 Pacific herring, Clupea harengus pallasi, roe fishery in California. Calif. Fish and Game, Mar. Resources Admin. Rept. 8-:-8 985. Biological characteristics of the catch from the 98-85 Pacific herring, Clupea harengus pallasi, roe fishery in California. Calif. Fish and Game, Mar. Resources Admin. Rept. 85-:-0. 986. Biological characteristics of the catch from the 985-86 Pacific herring, Clupea harengus pallasi, roe fishery in California. Calif. Fish and Game, Har. Resources Admin. Rept. 86-5:-5. 987. Biological characteristics of the catch from the 986-87 Pacific herring, Clupea harengus pallasi, roe fishery in California. Calif. Fish and Game, Mar. Resources Admin. Rept. 87-:-7. 988. Biological characteristics of the catch from the 987-88 Pacific herring, Clupea harengus pallasi, roe fishery in California. Calif. Fish and Game, Mar. Resources Admin. Rept. 88-6:-.

989a. Biological characteristics of the catch from the 988-89 Pacific herring, Clupea harengus pallasi, roe fishery in California. Calif. Fish and Game, Mar. Resources Admin. Rept. 89-5:-. 989b. Biomass estimates of Pacific herring, Clupea harengus pallasi, in California from the 988-89 spawningground surveys. Calif. Dept. Fish and Game, Mar. Resources Admin. Rept. 89-6:-. 990. Biological characteristics of the catch from the 989-90 Pacific herring, Clupea harengus pallasi, roe fishery in California. Calif. Fish and Game, Mar. Resources Admin. Rept. 90-:-6. 99. Biomass estimates of harengus pallasi, in California ground surveys. Calif. Dept. Admin. Rept. 9-. Pacific herring, Clupea from the 990-9 spawning Fish and Game, Mar. Resources

TABLE. Age and Weight Composition of the Tomales Bay Gill Net Catch, 980-8 through 990-9 Seasons. Age(years) 5 6 7 8 980-8 season 0 0 5 7 8 8 7 8 9 98-8 season 8 6 8 7 5 6 98-8 season 5 5 98-8 season ----------------------------------------------------------------- 98-85 season 6 5 0 6 7 5 5 6 5 5 7 5 985-86 season 5 7 7 8 0 0 5 6 986-87 season 0 7 8 7 7 9 6 7 987-88 season < < 9 8. 8 5 < 988-89 season 989-90 season * 990-9 season * * The Tomales Bay fishery was closed these two seasons and the samples were collected from the Bodega Bay catch. 8 9 7 7 0 8 6 9 8 7 6 6 8 9 6 5 8 0 6

"..-... ~_ ~ _... ~... J. ~ _.._,.... '--..._... -<.. TABLE. Mean Length of Herring from Tomales and San Francisco Bay Roe Fisheries, 97-7 through 990-9 Seasons. Tomales Bay San Francisco Bay Gill net Round haul Season Mean length mm BL Size range Mean length mm BL Size range Mean length mm BL Size range 97-7 97-7 97-75 975-76 976-77 86 90 89 8 69 50-6-8-6 50-0 0-6 9-6 77 78 78 8 - -6 8-0 -8 977-78 978-79 979-80 9HO-8 98-8 7 No 08 9-8 Samples 96-6 7-76-6 0 08 05 0 78-6 6-8-0 70-6 60-8 78 8 80 78 77-6- 8-0 50-.6 8-6 98-8 98-8 98-85 9H5-86 986-87 08 99 0 98 97 8-6 7-6- 66-6 7-6 0 05 96 96 9 70-0 8-58-8 66-6 68-8 65 76 78 7 5-6 -08 50-06 - 0-987-88 988-89 989-90 990-9 0 97 0 97 70-70-6 7-7- 95 95 96 9 60-0 6-6 7-6 6-6 7 6- Note. Tomales Bay has been restricted to gill nets only since 977. The 98-85 season was the first full season in which -/8 in mesh was allowed in the San Francisco Bay gill net fishery. In 988-89 season there was an increase in the use of in mesh gill nets in San Francisco Bay. These nets measured a legal -/8 in because the light net material stretched easily when measured.

~...~.... - '-"........ I' TABLE. Length Frequency of the 990-9 Tomales Bay Gill Net Catch. Age HM BL 5 6 7-8 9 0 8 6 0 8 6 0 5 08 06 0 8 0 5 00 5 98 7 96 5 9 6 9 7 90 9 88 86 6 8 8 8 80 5 78 76 ----------------------------------------------------------------- N 5 8 5 6 6 Mean 77 8 9 0 6 7 St. dev..8.9.9 5.9 7.9 5.0 7. 5

.. _... _. _. ~,-... J _, _t ~"_ c....-"oo.oi _ -... ~ _. ~.' -.. "e'...*._... _... ~.-:.~, "" _.. _v_._ ~.., _ TABLE. Mean Weight ( g) at Age of Herring in the Gill Net Catch by Area and Season. Tomales Bay Age Unwted. Season 5 6 7 8 9 mean* 979-80 0 5 7 5 88 8 980-8 9 5 6 77 0 98-8 8 6 7 58 60 7 98-8 00 0 50 69 7 0 98-8 9 06 50 7 98-85 76 0 09 7 5 5 6 7 5 985-86 7 9 06. 7 50 8 6 986-87 89 98 7 50 65 86 987-88 78 9 0 5 6 6 66 7 988-89 88 0 7 7 9 989-90 88 0 0 5 7 6 990-9 85 99 0 9 5 77 9 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Un,,-ted. * mean 7 89 05 8 9 65 7 San Francisco Bay Age Unwted. Season 5 6 7 8 9 mean* 979-80 6 5 50 78 980-8 95 05 8 5 6 50 7 98-8 7 88 0 7 5 70 7 8 98-8 8 0 7 56 69 8 98-8 69 0 5 7 0 98-85 6 95 0 5 9 0 5 8 7 985-86 7 07 6 8 5 6 5 986-87 77 98 07 5 9 69 7 987-88 6 88 00 7 59 76 8 988-89 75 90 99 5 0 8 56 77 0 989-90 88 97 0 8 6 66 86 9 990-9 80 89 99 09 8 5 67 5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Unwted. * mean 7 9 0 6 0 55 7 9 * Calculated from ages through 8 only; they comprise over 95% of the samples. 6

TABLE 5. Female to Male Sex and Biomass (Weight) Ratios of 990-9 herring Catch by Area.... ~ Sex ratio Biomass ratio Tomales Bay Gill Net San Francisco Bay Gill Net San Francisco Bay Round Haul :0.6 :0.6 :0.7 :0.5 :0.6 :0.7 ' 7

.'---..&..._ ~. "_.. a-. -._..lo::."'-._._ -.-... ~ -' ~......:..-...._...---...""'-_c...... -... --_... -.---.--------- TABLE 6. Age Composition of Variable Mesh Gill Net Catch from Tomales Bay, January 7, 99. Age N 5 0 68 97 9 5 88 7 6 89 7 7 8 < 9 < Total 5 00 8

TABLE 7. Age and Weight Composition of the San Francisco Bay Gill Net Catch, 980-8 through 990-9 Seasons. Age(years) 5 6 7 8 9 980-8 season 0 5 6 5 98-8 season < 5 9 9 0 5 8 5 7 < 98-8 season < < 8 6 9 8 0 8 9 < 98-8 season < < 0 8 6 5 6 5 98-85 season 6 5 8 9 8 5 5 8 5 985-86 season < < 8 6 6 7 7 7 986-87 season < < 7 6 9 7 8 6 8 5 < < 987-88 season < < 0 8 6 6 9 9 < < 988-89 season < < 9 9 9 < < 989-90 season 9 6 9 5 990-9 season < < 9 7 7 9 8 6 0 < 9

Table 8. Comparison of the Percentage Age Composition of the 990-9 San Francisco Bay Round Haul Herring Catch with Year Composite Age Composition. Round Haul Age Composition yr composite 990-9 season age N X age N X 00 9 89 8 68 0 59 8 6 5 5 5 8 8 6 87 6 6 5 7 7 7 5 8 9 8 9 9 < 9 0 0 ---------------------------------------------------------- Total 050 00 5 00 0

TABLE 9. Length Frequency of Herring from the 990-9 San Francisco Bay Gill Net Catch. mm BL 5 6 7 8 9 6 0 8 6 0 6 08 5 06 9 5 0 5 0 6 5 00 98 9 96 9 8 9 9 6 9 0 90 88 8 86 6 8 8 5 8 8 80 5 9 78 0 76 0 7 9 7 70 68 66 6 6 Age ---~------------------------------------~-----------~- ----------- N 5 9 9 5 8 Mean 66 77 8 9 00 08 8 St. de,,".0.9.6.6 5. 5.0 5.

... et_...,...-----. _ TABLE 0. Length Frequency of Herring from the 990-9 San Francisco Bay Round Haul Catch. DUD BL 5 6 7 8 9 Age 0 8 6 0 08 06 0 0 00 98 96 9 9 5 90 5 88 86 8 5 8 6 80 5 8 78 7 76 0 7 0 7 70 7 68 6 66 6 0 6 0 60 0 58 56 7 5 5 5 50 0-8 7 0-8 0-8 ----------------------------------------------------------------- N 9 70 6 8 5 Hean 60 7 8 9 99 08 7 St. dev. 7.7.7.0.8.8 0.9 9.9

Table. Comparison of Hean Weight (g) at Age of Herring in the 990-9 San Francisco Bay Round Haul Catch with Long Term Hean Values. Age Unwted. 5 6 7 8 9 mean* yr unwted. me"an 6 80 97 6 9 6 6 95 * 990-9 6 79 9 05 6 8 55 9 * * Calculated from ages through 6 only, they comprise over 95% of data.