United States Patent (19) Carlson

Similar documents
(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,052,424 B2

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2005/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/ A1

. United States Patent (19) Oonuma et al.

United States Patent (19) shikawa

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2015/ A1

United States Patent (19)

USOO A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,893,786 Stevens 45 Date of Patent: Apr. 13, 1999

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,880,421 B2. Watanabe et al. (45) Date of Patent: Apr. 19, 2005

United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,493,591 Kadowaki 45 Date of Patent: Feb. 20, 1996

United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,590,932 Olivieri 45) Date of Patent: Jan. 7, 1997

United States Patent (19)

E2IB (7/02 ( ) (52) U.S. Cl /19: 464/155 (58) Field of Classification Search / , 175/325.6

[11] Patent Number: 4,962,932

United States Patent (19) Herro

United States Patent (19) Mills

(12) United States Patent

Feb. 27, 1973 R. L. CRNDORFF, JR 3,717,943 MUD RESISTANT ELASTOMERS INVENTOR. Roy L.ORNDORFF, JR. ATTY.

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2015/ A1

United States Patent (19)

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2005/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2003/ A1

Lightweight portable training device to simulate kayaking

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2014/ A1

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,757,647 B1

(21) Appl. No.: 808, Filed: Dec. 16, ) Int. Cl... A63D 3/ U.S. Cl /38; 273/39; 3,039,772 6/1962 Simjian...

United States Patent (19) Condo et al.

United States Patent (19)

Wang 45 Date of Patent: Sep. 23, 1997

Device for atomizing a liquid

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,395,626 B2. Zedrosser (45) Date of Patent: Jul. 8, 2008

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,780,559 B2

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2011/ A1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,311,857 B1

United States Patent (19)

N3% (12) United States Patent. NNéré. (10) Patent No.: US 7, B2. Rossiter (45) Date of Patent: Nov. 20, 2007

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9.227,113 B2

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2005/ A1

United States Patent (19) Casebolt

III IIII - USOO550545OA United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,505,450 Stuff (45) Date of Patent: Apr. 9, 1996

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/ A1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,601,826 B1

United States Patent (19) Widecrantz et al.

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2004/ A1

United States Patent (19)

USOO6O76829A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 6,076,829 Oblack (45) Date of Patent: Jun. 20, 2000

United States Patent (19) Kaneko

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2016/ A1

United States Patent (19)

III IIHIII. United States Patent (19) 5,575,725 Nov. 19, Olsavsky. 11 Patent Number: 45 Date of Patent:

US A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/ A1 Chen (43) Pub. Date: Aug.

(10) Patent No.: US 7,331,117 B2

United States Patent (19) Olmr

US A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 6,004,224 Tanaka (45) Date of Patent: Dec. 21, 1999

Aug. 14, A4i/2 (2//y. D. COHN 2,758,416 KNEE JOINT STRUCTURE FOR WALKING DOLLS Filed Aug. 24, A772A/Ay INVENTOR.

United States Patent (19)

United States Patent (19) Salandre

United States Patent Osborne et al.

United States Patent (19) Dickinson et al.

United States Patent (19) Häberle

United States Patent (19)

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2011/ A1

(12) (10) Patent No.: US 7,055,842 B1. Lin (45) Date of Patent: Jun. 6, (54) FOLDING ELECTRIC BICYCLE 6,883,817 B1 4/2005 Chu...

March 13, Filed July l, T. A. FOX 3,024,679 SKIN PASS MILLS AND METHOD OF ROLLING 3 Sheets-Sheet. NWeNTOr Thomas A.

United States Patent (19) Grabel et al.

US A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 6,036,141 Clay (45) Date of Patent: Mar. 14, 2000

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,676,193 B1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2004/ A1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,052,416 B2. Chang (45) Date of Patent: May 30, 2006

HHHHHHHHHHHHIII. United States Patent (19) (45) Date of Patent: Aug. 23, ) Patent Number: 5,

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8, B1. Koski (45) Date of Patent: Aug. 23, 2011

United States Patent (19) Miettinen

III. United States Patent (19) Land. 11) Patent Number: 5,110,136 45) Date of Patent: May 5, 1992

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,984,723 B2

The below identified patent application is available for licensing. Requests for information should be addressed to:

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,393,587 B2

Blade guard for rotary lawn mowers

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/ A1

exercising facility (14), when the arms of the person are to

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2015/ A1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,062,037 B1

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,235,267 B2

United States Patent (19) Tarutani

ZZZZZZYZZZ. Šta Y. (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2011/ A1. (19) United States. Riegerbauer (43) Pub. Date: Dec.

O puty. (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2015/ A1. s Dk. (19) United States. s 21. Zack (43) Pub. Date: Apr.

Semi-automatic firearms

Precision Rotary Ball Screw

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2012/ A1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,730,548 B1

4,886,274 Dec. 12, 1989

United States Patent

United States Patent (19) Janes et al.

(12) United States Patent

United States Patent (19) Lotta

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,881,111 B2. Bridge et al. (45) Date of Patent: Apr. 19, 2005

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,488,161 B1

Transcription:

United States Patent (19) Carlson (54) (75) (73) 21 22 (51) 52 58) 56 EXTENDED CONTACT WARIABLE BALL PLANETARYTYPE WAVE GENERATOR Inventor: Assignee: John H. Carlson, Danvers, Mass. Quincy Technologies, Inc., New Haven, Conn. Appl. No.: 74,585 Fied: Jul. 17, 1987 int. Cl.'... F16C 19/50; F16H 25/06 - O - O - - - - - - - 384/447; 74/640 Field of Search... 384/447, 445, 492, 548; 74/640, 804, 805 References Cited U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS 2,906,143 9/1959 Musser... 310/83 X 2,930,254 3/1960 Musser et al.... 74/640 2,931,249 4/1960 Musser... 74/640 11 Patent Number: 4,776,708 (45) Date of Patent: Oct. 11, 1988 3,001,840 9/1961 Musser... 384/.447 3,199,370 8/1965 Prior... 74/640 4,451,098 5/1984 Farley et al.... 384/526 FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS 3331801 1/1984 Fed. Rep. of Germany... 384/.490 Primary Examiner-Stanley N. Gilreath Assistant Examiner-Thomas R. Hannon Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Donald N. Halgren 57 ABSTRACT A wave generator for a strain wave gearing device is provided wherein variant size balls are retained by a ball separator located between inner and outer ball races. A multiple number of balls on each diametrically opposed sides have the largest diameter with the balls decreasing in size away from these balls. 6 Claims, 4 Drawing Sheets w 22 RADALLOAD APPLIED THIS ReGON S REGON

U.S. Patent Oct. 11, 1988 Sheet 1 of 4 4,776,708 A-V/. 1 MNOR AX5 g At 7/7, 2 N1A OR AXIS MAX. SLOPE DATUN PANE N1 NOR AXIS

U.S. Patent Oct. 11, 1988 Sheet 2 of 4 4,776,708 At 7/7. 5 EXTEND MAJOR - 3. s AXIS REGION y O MAJOR AXS gcos2(9x v9. 2(2)x-180 A // 4. F- MINOR AXIS N1AJOR AXIS REGION

U.S. Patent Oct. 11, 1988 Sheet 3 of 4 4,776,708 A //7. 5 APPLIED LOADAPPLIED THIS REGON

U.S. Patent Oct. 11, 1988 Sheet 4 of 4 4,776,708

1. EXTENDED CONTACT VARABLE BALL PLANETARYTYPE WAVE GENERATOR Strain wave gearing employs three concentric com ponents to produce high mechanical advantage and speed reduction based on the principal of nonrigid body mechanics. An elliptoidally shaped wave generator is inserted into a cylindrical strain gear distorting the strain gear into an elliptoidal form. The strain gear is in the form of a flexible tubular member open at one end with external axially extending teeth around the periph ery adjacent the opening. These teeth mesh with the internal axially extending teeth on a rigid ring gear or circular spline. The number of teeth in the ring gear usually exceed by two the number of teeth in the strain gear. Since the teeth on the nonrigid strain gear and the teeth in the rigid circular spline are in continuous en gagement along the major axis of the elliptoidal shape, and since the strain gear has two teeth fewer than the circular spline, one revolution of the wave shape causes relative motion between the strain gear and the circular spline equal to two teeth. With the circular spline fixed, the strain gear will rotate in the opposite direction to the wave shape at a reduction ratio equal to the number of teeth on the strain gear divided by two. The strain gear may also be the fixed member and the circular spline would be the output member and rotate in the same direction as the wave shape. Strain wave gearing was first disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 2,906,143 granted Sept. 29, 1959; albeit a preferred method for producing the elliptoidal wave generator is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,001,840 granted Sept. 26, 1961. In this disclosure, the wave generator is formed by pressing a thin race bearing onto an elliptoidal plug, imposing the elliptoidal shape on the inner race and simultaneously transferring this shape through the balls into the deflectable outer race. Rotation of the elliptoi dal plug causes the deflection wave shape within the outer race to rotate at the same speed as the elliptoidal plug. An alternate method of producing an elliptoidal wave generator is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 2,931,249 granted Apr. 5, 1960. This arrangement utilizes variant size balls to produce the deflection wave within the outer race. A pair of largest diameter balls within the bearing are diametrically opposed to form the major axis of the elliptoidal wave shape and subsequent balls deposed from the major axis are slightly smaller than the preced ing balls by a prescribed amount. The inner raceway is circular and the elliptoidal wave shape is imposed on the deflectable outer race via the variant size balls. In this configuration, the rotation of the deflection wave shape within the outer race advances with the rotation of the balls. Consequently, the wave shape rotation is reduced from the circular inner race rotation by the ball planetary ratio. U.S. Pat. No. 2,930,254 granted Mar. 29, 1960 dis closes a configuration of a wave generator wherein the major axis, called lobes, is a constant radius over an extended arc to increase the tooth contact region. In strain wave gearing, the work is transferred from the input to the output through the balls in the wave generator bearing. A conventional wave generator with an elliptoidal plug accomplishes this by camming the balls radially outward from the minor axis position to the major axis position as the input is rotated. In a ball planetary type wave generator, the balls remain in a 4,776,708 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 45 50 55 65 2 fixed position relative to the deflection wave shape. As the deflection wave is rotated by rotating the inner race, the balls progressively advance relative to the outer race. Since the balls, in a variable ball, planetary type wave generator, get progressively larger from the minor axis to the major axis, rotation of the inner race causes the balls to move in a direction occupied by a smaller ball which cams the outer race radially out ward. The efficiency at which this is accomplished is proportional to the slope of the outer race relative to a circle whose center is coincident with that of the ellip toidal shape. It is an object of the present invention to provide a strain wave gearing device which utilizes a number of variant balls in the ball bearing assembly having a multi ple number of large balls to form an extended region of contact along the major axis to obtain a more favorable slope between the balls and deflectable race. Other objects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following portion of this specification and from the following drawings which illustrate in accordance with the mandate of the patent statutes a presently preferred embodiment of the inven tion. Referring to the drawings: FIG. 1 depicts an imaginary ring of R radius with a deflection wave imposed on it; FIG.2 depicts the wave shape with the reference ring transformed into a datum plane; FIG. 3 depicts a wave shape in an imaginary ring with an extended major axis region; FIG. 4 depicts the wave shape of FIG. 3 with the reference ring transformed into a datum plane; FIG. 5 depicts a ball contacting the inner and outer race at the point of maximum slope, which occurs at the midpoint between the major and minor axes, FIG. 6 depicts a strain wave gear device having a variable ball, ball planetary type wave generator with an uneven number of balls, the inner race being assem bled onto a circular member and the outer race having the deflection wave imposed upon it, and FIG. 7 depicts a strain wave gear device having a variable ball, ball planetary type wave generator with an uneven number of balls, the outer race being assem bled into a circular member and the inner race having the deflection wave imposed upon it. In strain wave gearing, the desired elliptoidal shape of the deflection wave for two lobes imposed on the outer race (FIG. 1) can be expressed as R--d/2 Cos 2X where R is the radius of the outer race in the circular state, d is the amplitude of the deflection wave and is expressed as 2R-i-ratio, X is the actual angle in degrees from the major axis. FIG. 1 depicts an imaginary ring of R radius with a deflection wave imposed on it. The major and minor axes are increased and decreased by an amount equal to d. FIG. 2 shows the reference ring transformed into a datum plane and the wave becomes a cosine curve. There is accordingly a changing slope between the datum plane and the cosine curve with zero slope oc curring at the major and minor axes and the maximum slope occurring at the intermediate positions. The mag nitude of this maximum slope for a two lobe elliptoi dally shaped wave generator is 2-- ratio. In this configuration, each deflection wave occurs over an angle of 180 degrees. However, when the ring has an extended major axis region, as in FIG. 3, the deflection wave is foreshortened to 180-z' where z is

3 the angle of the extended major axis region. To maintain the same circumferential length in the deflected ring as the circular ring, the minor axis decreases as the the arc length z increases. This can be expressed as: d = 2d 180 see -d where d1 is the total radial deflection of the ring along the minor axis. The radial deflection along the major axis will always be the difference between the pitch diameters of the strain gear and rigid gear. Consequently, the major axis will always be the ring diameter plus d, regardless of the arc length of the major axis region. The total amplitude of the deflection wave shown in FIG. 4 is d2 and is the sum of d/2 plus d1/2. It can also be expressed as 180 d; = d is: The maximum slope in FIG. 4 increases with an in crease in d2. In addition, as the arc length along the major axis increases, the length of the deflection wave decreases which also increases the maximum slope. The maximum slope for all two lobe wave generators with an extended major axis region can be expressed as 2 MAX, SOPE is 2 to - REDUCTION RATIO - 2 Without an extended major axis region, z would be Zero; consequently, the maximum slope would be 2--REDUCTION RATIO as given above. FIG. 5 shows a ball contacting the inner and outer race at the point of maximum slope, which occurs at midpoint between the major and minor axis. When the inner race moves through a distance XT, the ball will advance an amount XT/2. While the ball is advancing through this distance, the outer race is cammed radially outward through a distance XT/2 times the slope. Work is a function of a force through a distance. Thus, the work done by the ball when the inner race moves through a distance XT is XT2(FR) where FR is the radial load acting on the ball. Accordingly, as the slope increases the radial force FR will decrease to pro duce the same amount of work. Similarly, a decrease in the slope cause the radial force FR to increase. The higher the radial load on the ball, the greater the losses. For this reason, it is desirable to maximize the slope, keeping within the confines of good design practice to minimize the radial load on the balls to minimize the losses and enhance the efficiency of a strain wave gear ing mechanism. The possible combinations in ball sizes, ball location and number of balls in a variable ball planetary type wave generator are limitless. Consequently, the pre ferred embodiment uses the inner and outer raceway of a conventional wave generator bearing per U.S. Pat. No. 3,001,840. Normally, this bearing has twenty-three balls of uniform size and a separator to space the balls. To obtain the maximum slope in the outer race to achieve the desired cam angle, the arc length along the major axis was extended. This was accomplished by having a multiple number of the largest diameter balls along each side of the major axis. It was desirous to keep the length of each deflection wave uniform. Since 4,776,708 O 15 25 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 4. the separator had an odd number of pockets, it was necessary to have one more ball along one side of the major axis than the other. A strain wave gearing device having a variable ball, ball planetary type wave generator having an unevenly extended major axis is illustrated in FIG. 6. The device has the three basic components of strain wave gearing. An elliptoidal wave generator 10 is inserted into a cylin drical strain gear 12 deflecting the strain gear 12 into an elliptical form. The strain gear 12 is in the form of a flexible tubular member open at one end with external axially extending teeth 14 around the periphery adja cent the opening. These teeth mesh with the internal axially extending teeth 16 on a ring gear 18. The elliptoidal wave generator 10 includes a ball bearing assembly 20 made up of an odd number of vari ant balls 22 individually contained within discrete iden tical pockets of a ball pocket separator 26 located be tween inner 30 and outer races 32, which is pressed onto a cylindrical plug 28. Shown in FIG. 6 are the identical circumferential side partitions 34 of the separator 26 which are located equidistant (S) about the ball pocket separator 26. Such a ball pocket separator having identi cal pockets for receiving identical balls is illustrated in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 4,451,098. In the strain wave gearing device illustrated in FIG. 6, five balls form the major axis regions, three on one side and two on the other labelled 'A'. Each successive ball away from the major axis is progressively smaller by a prescribed amount, thus 'B' is smaller than 'A', "C" is smaller than "B", etc. This varying ball size imposes the desired deflection wave in the outer race. For illustration purposes, the deflection wave in the outer race is grossly exaggerated causing an extreme variation in ball diameters. In actuality, the difference would be less than ten percent of the largest ball diame ter. During operation, the balls in the first and third quad rants are subjected to a radial load. The magnitude of this force is directly proportional to the output torque. When the round plug 28 is rotated, it rotates the inner race 30 causing the balls 22 to roll against the outer race 32 and translate in a circumferential direction. The ratio of inner race rotation to that of the balls and deflection wave rotation is a function of the ball planetary action. The ball planetary ratio can be calculated as 1-C/A where C is the diameter of the deflectable raceway and A is the diameter of the circular raceway. When the balls translate, due to rotation of the circu lar race, they advance into a region of the deflectable race which is at a different radius. Thus, the ball contin uously cams the deflectable race radially as it translates. This produces the work which causes the output to rotate as a speed reducer. Similarly, when strain wave gearing operates as a speed increaser, i.e. low speed element functions as the input while the high speed wave generator inner race functions as the output. The torque applied to the low speed element causes the strain gear to wrap around the outer race which exerts a force on the balls normal to the surface. This force then causes the ball to move towards a point of greater radial displacement causing the balls to rotate which produces rotation of the inner race. FIG. 7 depicts a strain wave gear device the same in principle to that shown in FIG. 6, except that the outer race 50 is assembled into a circular member 52. The inner race 54 has the deflection wave imposed upon

5 it. A deflectable gear 56 is elliptically engaged by the inner race 54 into engagement with a gear 58. Every wave generator assembly prior to this applica tion was comprised of either all balls within the bearing of an identical size, or the balls within the bearing of variant size with only two large balls, one on each side diametrically opposed, forming the major axis. Applicant has determined that improved results are obtained by using a multiple number of largest diameter balls on each side to form the major axis region. I claim: 1. A wave generator for a strain wave gearing com prising: a cylindrical member, and a bearing assembly on said cylindrical member, in cluding: an inner race, an outer race, with at least one of the races con structed to be flexible to carry a deflection wave, an annular ball separator, and a compliment of variant size balls between the inner and outer races with a multiple number of the larg est diameter balls on each side diametrically op posed with the ball sizes progressively decreasing in size away from the largest diameter ball, said inner race being assembled onto a circular plug and said outer race has the deflection wave im posed upon it, with the largest diameter balls defin ing the major axis region, the largest diameter balls being an even number on one side and an odd number of balls on the opposite side. 4,776,708 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 6 2. A wave generator according to claim 1, wherein the largest diameter balls sub-tend an arc of 15 to 60' along each side. 3. A wave generator according to claim 1, wherein one of the variant ball sizes will be at or close to the intermediate position of the deflection wave having a maximum slope thereat. 4. A wave generator according to claim 1, wherein two balls of the smallest size variant balls will be posi tioned, one on each side, at midpoint on the deflection wave to support the minor axis. 5. A wave generator for a strain wave gearing com prising: cylindrical member, and a bearing assembly in said cylindrical member, in cluding: an inner race, an outer race with at least one of the races con structed to be flexible to carry a deflection wave, an annular ball separator, and a compliment of variant size balls between the inner and outer races with a multiple number of the larg est diameter balls on each side diametrically op posed with the ball sizes progressively decreasing in size away from the largest diameter ball, said outer race being assembled into a circular mem ber and said inner race has the deflection wave imposed in it, with the largest diameter ball defin ing the minor axis region, the number of largest diameter balls is an even number of balls on one side and an odd number of balls on the opposite side. 6. A wave generator according to claim 5, wherein two balls of the smallest size variant balls shall be posi tioned, one on each side, at midpoint on the deflection wave to support the major axis. is t 45 50 55 65