Seakeeping Tests (with ships) Experimental Methods in Marine Hydrodynamics Lecture in week 43

Similar documents
ITTC Recommended Procedures and Guidelines

Conventional Ship Testing

ITTC Recommended Procedures Testing and Extrapolation Methods Loads and Responses, Seakeeping Experiments on Rarely Occurring Events

Lab test 4 Seakeeping test with a model of an oil tanker

MASTER THESIS PRESENTATION. Comparison Of Seakeeping Performance Of The Two Super Yachts Of 53 And 46 m In Length

ITTC - Recommended Procedures and Guidelines

for Naval Aircraft Operations

IMO REVISION OF THE INTACT STABILITY CODE. Proposal of methodology of direct assessment for stability under dead ship condition. Submitted by Japan

IACS URS11 defines the dimensioning wave load for ship design, but what does it mean from a statistical point of view?

RESOLUTION MSC.141(76) (adopted on 5 December 2002) REVISED MODEL TEST METHOD UNDER RESOLUTION 14 OF THE 1995 SOLAS CONFERENCE

Trim and Stabilisation systems NEXT GENERATION IN BOAT CONTROL.

MODEL TESTS OF THE MOTIONS OF A CATAMARAN HULL IN WAVES

ITTC Recommended Procedures and Guidelines

DAVIDSON LABORATORY STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY HOBOKEN, NEW JERSEY OBLIQUE WAVE TESTING AT DAVIDSON LABORATORY. Edward V. Lewis.

STATION KEEPING EXTENSIVE MODEL TESTING OF A DRY-TREE SPREAD-MOORED BARGE IN BRAZILLIAN WATERS

1. A tendency to roll or heel when turning (a known and typically constant disturbance) 2. Motion induced by surface waves of certain frequencies.

Development of TEU Type Mega Container Carrier

THE PERFORMANCE OF PLANING HULLS IN TRANSITION SPEEDS

ITTC Recommended Procedures and Guidelines

A Study on Roll Damping of Bilge Keels for New Non-Ballast Ship with Rounder Cross Section

Numerical and Experimental Investigation of the Possibility of Forming the Wake Flow of Large Ships by Using the Vortex Generators

The Usage of Propeller Tunnels For Higher Efficiency and Lower Vibration. M. Burak Şamşul

ITTC Recommended Procedures Testing and Extrapolation Methods Manoeuvrability Free-Sailing Model Test Procedure

Offshore Oil and Gas Platforms for Deep Waters

CALCULATIONS OF THE MOTIONS OF A SHIP MOORED WITH MOORMASTER UNITS

ITTC Recommended Procedures and Guidelines

3D CDF MODELING OF SHIP S HEELING MOMENT DUE TO LIQUID SLOSHING IN TANKS A CASE STUDY

DAMAGE STABILITY TESTS OF MODELS REPRESENTING RO-RC) FERRIES PERFORMED AT DMI

Advanced Applications in Naval Architecture Beyond the Prescriptions in Class Society Rules

Offshore Wind Turbine monopile in 50 year storm conditions

THE EFFECTS OF THE HULL VANE ON SHIP MOTIONS OF FERRIES AND ROPAX VESSELS

SECOND ENGINEER REG III/2 NAVAL ARCHITECTURE

Minor changes. Updated for comments. Issued to inform

WAVE IMPACTS DUE TO STEEP FRONTED WAVES

ITTC - Recommended Procedures and Guidelines

Catenary Mooring Chain Eigen Modes and the Effects on Fatigue Life

An Experimental Investigation of Ride Control Algorithms for High-Speed Catamarans Part 2: Mitigation of Wave Impact Loads

Interceptors in theory and practice

DP Ice Model Test of Arctic Drillship

Common Structural Rules for Bulk Carriers, January Background Document

ShipRight. Additional Design Procedures. Comparative Sloshing Analysis of LNG Ship Containment Systems. Design and construction

INFLUENCE OF THE BOW SHAPE ON LOADS IN HIGH AND STEEP WAVES

CRITERIA OF BOW-DIVING PHENOMENA FOR PLANING CRAFT

Sea State Estimation from an Advancing Ship

U S F O S B u o y a n c y And Hydrodynamic M a s s

FPSO Bow Damage in Steep Waves

Design of high-speed planing hulls for the improvement of resistance and seakeeping performance

A NOVEL FLOATING OFFSHORE WIND TURBINE CONCEPT: NEW DEVELOPMENTS

Voith Water Tractor Improved Manoeuvrability and Seakeeping Behaviour

Ocean Transits in a 50m, 45 knot Catamaran The Minimisation of Motions and Speed Loss

THE USE OF A VERTICAL BOW FIN FOR THE COMBINED ROLL AND YAW STABILIZATION OF A FAST PATROL BOAT

Abstract. 1 Introduction

Comparison of Motion Sickness Incidence (MSI) of three Crew Transfer Vessels with different hull forms. Héloïse Vignal

GEA FOR ADVANCED STRUCTURAL DYNAMIC ANALYSIS

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON THE HYDRODYNAMIC BEHAVIORS OF TWO CONCENTRIC CYLINDERS

ICE LOADS MONITORING SYSTEMS

The Susceptibility of FPSO Vessel to Green Water in Extreme Wave Environment

RESPONSE BASED WEATHER-ROUTING AND OPERATION PLANNING OF HEAVY TRANSPORT VESSELS

INCLINOMETER DEVICE FOR SHIP STABILITY EVALUATION

Wave phenomena in a ripple tank

Model Tests for a Floating Wind Turbine on Three Different Floaters

Quantification of the Effects of Turbulence in Wind on the Flutter Stability of Suspension Bridges

Development of Self-Installing Deepwater Spar. Ashit Jadav February 2017

Slamming Analysis on a 35,000 Ton Class of Drillship

Dynamic Component of Ship s Heeling Moment due to Sloshing vs. IMO IS-Code Recommendations

2.016: Hydrodynamics

Friction properties of the face of a hand-held tennis racket

MODELLING OF WATER FLOW ON SMALL VESSEL S DECK

A Wave Basin Model Test Study for a Jackup Moored on the Dock

WIND TURBINE SHUTTLE HUISMAN PRODUCT BROCHURE

Wind Turbine Shuttle. Ferdinand van Heerd

Hydrodynamic Analysis of a Heavy Lift Vessel during Offshore Installation Operations

Model Experiments in Following and Quartering Seas using a Small Size Ship Model

Physics Mechanics

STABILITY OF MULTIHULLS Author: Jean Sans

MOTIONS AND LOADS OF A HIGH-SPEED CRAFT IN REGULAR WAVES: PREDICTION AND ANALYSIS F

MOTION CONTROL IN WAVES OF A 140M SES

Wave Forces on a Moored Vessel from Numerical Wave Model Results

SHAFTING VIBRATION PRIMER

Proposal for a Design of a Autonomous Bridge-Mapping Hydroplane

Split-time Algorithm Implementation in Advanced Hydrodynamic Codes

Edit this text for your title

The Effect of Mast Height and Centre of Gravity on the Re-righting of Sailing Yachts

RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT, STATIC AND DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF TRANSMISSION LINE TOWER: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Experiences with Seakeeping Capabilities of SES Ships

CERTIFICATES OF COMPETENCY IN THE MERCHANT NAVY MARINE ENGINEER OFFICER

Dynamic Positioning Control Augmentation for Jack-up Vessels

Joint Industry Project (JIP) Shaft Dynamic Loads and Responses at Extreme Maneuvering and Ventilation of Mechanical Azimuthing Thrusters

Aerodynamic Measures for the Vortex-induced Vibration of π-shape Composite Girder in Cable-stayed Bridge

RIGID RISERS FOR TANKER FPSOs

FORECASTING OF ROLLING MOTION OF SMALL FISHING VESSELS UNDER FISHING OPERATION APPLYING A NON-DETERMINISTIC METHOD

FAST SUPPLY INTERVENTION and CREW TRANSFER VESSEL M P 6 2 5

Proceedings of the ASME th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering

Selecting Monohull, Catamaran and Trimaran as Suitable Passenger Vessels Based on Stability and Seakeeping Criteria

An Investigation into the Capsizing Accident of a Pusher Tug Boat

Application of pushover analysis in estimating seismic demands for large-span spatial structure

The OTSS System for Drift and Response Prediction of Damaged Ships

Modelling of Extreme Waves Related to Stability Research

Sea state estimation from an advancing ship - The wave buoy analogy Presentation at Skibsteknisk Selskab

New Vessel Fuel Efficient Design and Construction Considerations Medium and Long-Term Options

Transcription:

Seakeeping Tests (with ships) Experimental Methods in Marine Hydrodynamics Lecture in week 43 1

Topics Why do seakeeping tests? What to do? Activities Details of model test set-up and instrumentation Waves and wave calibration In-depth topics: Test configurations Measurement of global forces Measurement of local (slamming) forces Speed loss due to waves Example project testing the ADX Express pentamaran Labtest 4 2

Why do seakeeping tests? Typical Objectives Reveal possible seakeeping problems with a new design Measure added resistance and speed loss due to waves Determine operational limits Optimization of design with respect to seakeeping Measure design loads Capsize and safety studies Development and testing of motion damping systems Studies of propulsion in waves 3

Activities (in typical sequence) 1. Manufacture of model (see pres. Week 38) 2. Do calm water performance tests (if ordered) (Week 34) 3. Instrumentation of model (Week 35) Calibrate transducers (Week 34) Mount all onboard instruments 4. Dynamic ballasting (Week 38) Place ballast loads to obtain correct centre of gravity and radius of gyration in pitch 5. Calibration of waves (without model in the lab) (Week 38) 6. Performance of tests 7. Data analysis and reporting (Week 36) 4

Two test modes: Free model Measurement of motions and accelerations Possibly measurement of internal global or local (slamming) forces This is the most commonly used method a direct modeling of the real ship behavior Fixed model Measurement of total forces on the model Model might be given forced motions (radiation forces) or being fixed in incoming waves (excitation forces) Used to verify and validate numerical methods 5

Free model different test set-ups 1. Model free to heave, pitch (and surge) 2. Model with restricted horizontal motions 3. Model completely free 6

1. Model free to heave, pitch (and surge) - unpowered model Head and following seas With forward speed In a towing tank Measurements (typical): Heave and pitch motions Vertical accelerations Added resistance due to waves Relative wave motions 7

1. Model free to heave, pitch (and surge) - powered model Head and following seas With forward speed In a towing tank Measurements: Heave and pitch motions Vertical accelerations Propeller thrust, torque and RPM Speed loss and/or added power Relative wave motions 8

9

2. Model with restricted horizontal motions - Suspended in a system of thin wires and springs All headings With or without forward speed In a towing tank or seakeeping basin Measurements: 6 DoF motions (by optical position measurement system) Vertical accelerations Drift forces Relative wave motions 10

Setup typical for ocean basin tests at zero forward speed To land To land Spring Spring 90 deg Ship model 90 deg Spring Spring To land To land Note: Natural frequencies of the mass-spring system must be far lower than the wave excitation frequencies 11 What happens if the natural frequency is much higher than the wave excitation frequencies?

12

Set-up for test in towing tank at forward speed Force transducers Measuring force in axial direction Beam (fixed to model) Pre-tensioned wires Model X-force transducer 13

3. Model completely free Must be self-propelled Must have active rudder/steering Should have auto-pilot Might have a bundle of cables to a carriage, or be completely free, with battery power Measurements: 6 DoF motions (by optical position measurement system) Accelerations (vertical, lateral and longitudinal) Yaw rate (for auto-pilot) by rate gyro Global forces in the hull beam Local (slamming) forces Relative wave motions 14

15

Waves an important part of a seakeeping test! Irregular wave spectra - Direct measurement of seakeeping in a realistic sea state - Requires long measurement time series Regular waves - Measurement of Response Amplitude Operators (RAO), for comparison and tuning of calculations - Design-wave approach - Accelerated tests of dynamic stability Transient wave (Impulse wave) Can give RAO for many frequencies simultaneously 17 Pink noise White noise with limited band-width

Transient waves A sequence of waves of increasing length is produced by the wave maker The longer waves travel faster than the shorter waves The wave train is tuned in order to have all generated waves reach one point at the same time Result: One single wave containing many frequencies 18

19 Transient wave at various locations

Vert.acc. FP Input wave Transient wave tests with 160 m cruise liner Time series Power spectra 20

21 RAO derived from transient wave tests

Pink noise Wave spectral density Frequency Aim is to excite as much of the frequency range as possible in order to find RAOs 22 Difficult to generate large frequency range with almost equal wave power spectral density Wave-breaking limits energy in the high frequency range Wavemaker amplitude limits energy in low frequency range

S Wave calibration Wanted wave spectrum Inverse FFT Example of comparison of wanted and measured wave spectrum h h Time realisation t Wave maker system Measured Time Series Comparison of wanted and measured wave spectrum. Adjustment of input wave parameters t S FFT Measured wave spectrum 23

Length of time series irregular waves Depends on: The period of the most low frequent phenomena in the tests The system damping The required standard deviation of the statistical results Common rule-of-thumb -type requirement: Time series 100 times longer than the period of the most low-frequent phenomena of interest in the tests ( 100 wave encounters) Wave frequency response 1000 seconds in full scale Slow-drift forces up to 10 hours, (3 hours is common practice) Slamming, capsize and other extreme events have much higher return periods! 24

Length of time series general and in regular waves We are usually interested in stationary condition transient response from start of test shall not influence how long it takes from start to stationary conditions depend mainly on the damping: Roll: low damping (transient 5-10 times roll natural period) Heave: high damping (transient < heave natural period) Speed (for self-propelled models): Depend on the propulsion characteristics, but is of significant duration Regular waves: Need typically 10 wave cycles after reaching stationary conditions (depending on how equal the cycles are) 25

Testing of extreme and rarely occurring events Ultimate strength (maximum loads) are often assessed using a design wave Dynamic stability and capsize is often tested in large regular waves Slamming is tested in selected irregular sea states 26

Design waves Non-linear numerical calculations and also model experiments might take a long time to perform Instead of calculating or testing for a long time in a realistic, extreme irregular seastate, one might create a wave that is designed to be the worst possible in the given sea state Linear seakeeping theory is used to find the worst combination of the different frequency components in the irregular spectrum 27 According to Airy wave theory, the most unfavorable wave condition for a vessel is not the wave of which all components have a peak at the same time instant, but the wave leading to a response for which this is the case. (Drummen et. al. 2008)

Design waves cont. Most Likely Response Wave (MLRW) A wave designed to create a certain response Linear theory is used to establish the link between waves and response An advanced numerical method or model tests is used to find the actual response to this wave Conditional Random Response Wave (CRRW) Like the MLRW, but superimposed on an irregular background wave The fundamental assumption of wave conditioning techniques is that the nonlinear response is a correction of the linear response. (Drummen et. al. 2008) 28 http://www.ivt.ntnu.no/imt/courses/tmr7/resources/drummen_2008.pdf

Dynamic stability in waves Problems related to: Broaching Bow dive Coupled pitch-roll-yaw Problems usually occur when groups of large regular waves are encountered Rarely occurring event! Model testing in equivalent regular waves of different height and frequency 29

Dynamic stability in waves Wave Height H (m) 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 /L=1.0 /L=1.25 /L=1.5 /L=2.0 Steepness 1/10 Capacity wave maker Steepness 1/15 Steepness 1/20 4 2 30 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Wave Period T (s)

Measurement of global loads Purpose: To determine the design loads, used for dimensioning of the ship structure Modeling alternatives: Backbone model Fully elastic model Segmented model Strain gauges 31

32 Backbone model during calibration

33 Backbone model during testing

34 Segmented model of bulk carrier (Before segmentation of the hull itself)

Segmented models frame and force measurement Feather rod 3-comp. force transducers Movable fastening block 35 Hinge Aluminium frame

6-component force transducers M Z z 1 M Y a y y 1 Y a z1 z 1 x 1 Sum of forces: X M X X Y 3 i 1 3 i 1 x i y i z 2 y 2 Z z 3 y 3 Z z 2,3 x 2,3 Z 3 i 1 z i = 3-comp. force transducers 37 Mx M y y 2 y3 az2 y1 az 1 x 2 x3 az2 x1 az1 M z y 3 y ay 2

Location of segmentation cuts Depends on what you want to measure Midship bending moment midship Shear force due to slamming stern quarter For flexible models, it also depends on the number of flexible modes 38

Model Tests of the ADX Express 42 CFD calculations Initial resistance testing, 4 smaller models Resistance test, new model Optimisation for the longitudinal position of the aft pair of sponsons Seakeeping tests with original and modified design

43

44 Segmented Pentamaran model

45 Segmented Pentamaran model - sponson

Objectives With Seakeeping Model Testing Evaluate the wave-induced motions and accelerations. Measure occurrences of air entering the waterjet inlets. Measure occurrences of slamming. Establish the speed loss in irregular sea states. Evaluate the wave induced forces on the central hull and on the bridging structures between the central hull and sponsons. Establish the response amplitude operators (RAO) in regular waves for certain parameters to verify different hydrodynamic calculations and computer code. 46

Model Configuration 41 knots testing speed. Self-propelled model with four waterjets and nozzles controlled by an online Autopilot. Interceptor plates installed onto the aft pair of sponsons controlled in the online mode by a PD-regulator by roll angle and rate of roll. Segmentation of the central hull into four sections with 5-component force transducers connecting the sections. Installation of 5-component force transducers on each bridging structure between the central hull and the sponsons. Maintaining the correct hydrostatic properties. Maintaining the correct LCG and mass moment of inertia around the transverse axis for each model section. 47

Measurement of slamming Slamming is important for: Local loads dimensioning of plating and stiffeners Global whipping loads dimensioning of hull beam Noise and vibrations (comfort problem) Problem areas: Overhung sterns (flat with low draught) Bow flare Flat bottom (small ships in extreme seas) 48

Characteristics of slamming loads High peak pressure values Very short duration Elasticity of the structure is important 49

What is Hydroelasticity? 50 (Hutchison, 2011)

Dynamic hydroelasticity Fluid forces Structural response The deformation of the structure due to fluid loading has significant impact on the fluid loading Examples: Wing flutter Many types of slamming loads Vortex-induced vibrations Sea loads on many types of floating fish-farms 51

Requirements for measurement Extremely high sampling frequency ( 1 khz) Fast rise time (quick response) of transducers Resonance frequency of transducer (including fixture): Very low (by adding a big mass) or Very high (by making an extremely stiff structure) or Correctly modeled dynamic response 52

Carriage Note on stiffness of models and transducers Force transducer 53 If n >> e Stiff system measured force = hydrodynamic load If n e flexible system measured force response to get hydrodynamic load we need to analyse the response of the model system As a general rule, we prefer stiff model systems!

Different transducer configurations Point pressure measurements Needs very many pressure transducers Slamming panels Area similar to typical plating field Measure the integrated force on a representative area Segmented model Measuring force on entire afterbody or bow section Useful if interested in global effects, like whipping Different transducer configurations are often used in combination 55

Different slamming transducer configs Slamming panels in bow flare Segmented stern for measurement of integrated force 56 Slamming panels in overhung Flat stern

Running of self-propelled models - Alternatives Constant carriage speed controlling propeller revs manually to maintain same average speed as carriage (can be a challenging task!) Constant propeller revs Easy to do with ordinary frequency-controlled AC motors or brushless DC servo motors Constant propulsion power Can be easily done by using the built-in control system of the drives of brushless DC servo motors, which are increasingly used Carriage speed must be adjusted to match average model speed 57

Calculation of total speed loss P B Prop.power at constant RPM Speed loss due to added power Required power in waves Meas. speed loss Required power in calm water Total speed loss V S 58

Tank wall effects Radiated waves=created by model motions Diffracted waves=incoming waves reflected by the model Wave group speed: c g g 2 e Ucrit L LM c M g g 2L M 1 1 tw B 2 B 60 This is why you should not run zero speed tests in a towing tank!

Summary Purposes of seakeeping tests The three different test set-ups: Fixed, free, partly restrained Types of waves In depth: Impulse waves Recording time length of tests How to handle rarely occurring events? Example: Testing dynamic stability Model Tests of the ADX Express Slamming and global forces Measuring speed loss and added power Tank wall interference 65