VALUES ASSOCIATED WITH THE APALACHICOLA BAY MARINE ECONOMY

Similar documents
Marine Recreational and Commercial Industries and Activities in Lee and Charlotte Counties: Economic Consequences and Impacts

The University of Georgia

Commercial Red Grouper Fishing in the Gulf of Mexico States

Economic Contribution of the 2018 Recreational Red Snapper Season in the South Atlantic

Economic Impact of Hunting Expenditures on Southern U.S

The 2010 Economic Contribution of Tourism to the Meadowlands Liberty Region

colorado.edu/business/brd

Commercial Yellowfin Tuna Fishing in the Gulf of Mexico States

The Power of Outdoor Recreation Spending in Pennsylvania:

Wildlife Watching in the U.S.: The Economic Impacts on National and State Economies in 2011

Noah Williams. University of Wisconsin-Madison Center for Research On the Wisconsin Economy (CROWE) Outlook for the Wisconsin Economy

Ohio Sea Grant ECONOMIC IMPACT OF LAKE ERIE ON NORTHERN OHIO. Ohio State University Sea Grant Program. AGI HDlOl. no.604. c.6

Wildlife Watching in the U.S.: The Economic Impacts on National and State Economies in 2006

COOPERATIVE EXTENSION Bringing the University to You

Table of contents. Florida ranks as the second highest state (after California) in the number of people participating in wildlife-viewing recreation.

THE PERRYMAN GROUP. The Economic Benefits of the Precision Dance Industry Inspired by the Kilgore College Rangerettes

Hunter and Angler Expenditures, Characteristics, and Economic Effects, North Dakota,

The 2006 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in TEXAS. Prepared by:

The 2001 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in MISSOURI. Prepared by:

Commercial Florida Stone Crab Fishing in the Gulf of Mexico States

Economic Impact Analysis BOONE DOCKS RESORT AND MARINA, LLC

Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill

The Economic Significance of Florida Bay. Dr. Andrew Stainback GEER April Coral Springs, Florida

Appendix G Coastal Demographic and Economic Trends Additional Figures

Profile and Economic Impacts of Agriculture and Natural Resource Industries in the Suwannee River Basin Counties of Florida

Basic Information Everyone Should Know

San Patricio County Guided Fishing Market Research

Status and Trends Report: 2012 Penaeid Shrimp Species Account FL FWCC FWRI SEDAR-PW6-RD July 2014

The 2006 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in NORTH CAROLINA. Prepared by:

Integration of Sustainable Development on Long Island s Coastal Industries 1

Fishing Industry in Prince Edward Island January 2009

Job Creation Survey, 4 th Quarter 2015 and 1 st Quarter 2016

Nevada County Population Projections 2013 to 2032 Based On The Last Estimate Year of 2012

The 2010 BP Oil Disaster Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission 63 rd Annual Meeting August 24, 2010

Lobsters to Dollars: The Economic Impact of the Lobster Distribution Supply Chain in Maine

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF RECREATIONAL SALTWATER FISHING ON THE LOUISIANA ECONOMY

Wenlin Liu, Senior Economist. Stateof Wyoming. Economic Analysis Division State of Wyoming 1

The Economic Impacts of Carolina Beach Inlet Navigability

Big Changes, Unknown Impacts

An input-output analysis of recreational fishing expenditures (2006 & 2011) across the southern United States

ECONOMIC IMPACTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS OF SPORTFISHING IN ALASKA

The Wisconsin and Minnesota Economies: What can we learn from each other? Noah Williams

The Economic Impact of Golf In South Carolina

Final Report, October 19, Socioeconomic characteristics of reef users

Economic Impact of the Recreational Marine Industry Broward, Miami-Dade, and Palm Beach Counties, Florida

Business management in equine businesses

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE UNITED STATES CERVID FARMING INDUSTRY

Provide a brief introduction to the U.S. seafood industry

Sport Fishing Expenditures and Economic Impacts on Public Lands in Washington

Economic Analysis of Marine Recreational Fishing at NOAA Fisheries

PROVINCE OF SASKATCHEWAN INVESTOR PRESENTATION

By making use of SAFRIM (South African Inter-Industry Macro-Economic Model) By Jeaunes Viljoen, Conningarth Economists, 1

Nueces County Guided Fishing Market Research

ECONOMIC IMP ACT REPORT 2018

Independent Economic Analysis Board. Review of the Estimated Economic Impacts of Salmon Fishing in Idaho. Task Number 99

ECONOMIC ACTIVITY ASSOCIATED WITH HUNTING ALONG THE TEXAS GULF COAST. Joni S. Charles, PhD. Contracted through the. River Systems Institute

Teton County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, For the Wyoming Wildlife Federation. David T. Taylor & Thomas Foulke

The Economics of Atlantic Highly Migratory Species For-Hire Fishing Trips July - November 2013 Clifford Hutt and George Silva

Custer County Demographic Profile

Fremont County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, 2015

U.S. and Colorado Economic Outlook National Association of Industrial and Office Parks. Business Research Division Leeds School of Business

Re: Algae/Cyanobacteria Bloom in St. Lucie, Martin, Palm Beach and Lee Counties.

ORLANDO MSA MARKET OVERVIEW LAST UPDATED: MAY 2018

THE NEXUS OF LIVABILITY, TRANSIT, AND PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT

Texas Housing Markets: Metropolitan vs. Border Communities. September 22, 2014

Carbon County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, 2015

The Economic Gains from Reallocating Specific Saltwater Fisheries

More of the Same; Or now for Something Completely Different?

Texas Water Resources Institute

The Economic Impact of Recreational Fishing in the Everglades Region

Economic Growth and Revitalization on Long Island: the Role of the Recreational Fishing and Marine Economy

Project Termination Report Part I: Summary

Recreational Fishing License Sales in Florida:

GRE PROJECTS $78 MILLION IMPACT FROM 2013 PGA CHAMPIONSHIP TOURNAMENT TO BE HELD AT ROCHESTER S OAK HILL COUNTRY CLUB AUG. 5-11, 2013 Overview

New Sportfishing Data and Industry Trends

Economic Contributions and Impacts of Salmonid Resources in Southeast Alaska

Sport Fishing Expenditures and Economic Impacts on Public Lands in Oregon

Hooray for Barnegat Bay!

The Economic Benefits of Hunting and Fishing Activities in Alberta in 2008

Larry Kessler, Ph.D. Boyd Center for Business & Economic Research University of Tennessee

British Columbia's Fisheries & Aquaculture Sector May 2001

2019 Economic Outlook: Will the Recovery Ever End?

U.S. Economy in a Snapshot

Economic Impact of Recreational Fishing for Bonefish, Permit and Tarpon in Belize for 2007

Small Business Dynamics and Job Creation. Small Business Numbers, Pretty Pictures and Not So Pretty Pictures

Economic Impact of Lobster Sector - Province of New Brunswick and Its Counties

One Year Later A regional assessment of seafood consumption patterns after the Gulf oil spill

Economic Contribution of Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation in Colorado. Executive Summary Season. A joint cooperation report

Go to Reference with Economic Statistics for US by Region and State. NOAA summary of fisheries of the US by state

Salmon Five Point Approach restoring salmon in England

Prince William Sound Aquaculture Corporation Economic Impact Update for 2010

The 2017 Economic Contributions of Outdoor Recreation in Colorado A regional and county-level analysis

2015 Economic Forecast & Industry Outlook. Robert A. Kleinhenz, Ph.D. Chief Economist, Kyser Center for Economic Research, LAEDC October 8, 2014

Colorado Economic Update

Economic Impact of Mountain Biking in the Nantahala and Pisgah National Forests

State and National Economic Effects of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Related Recreation on U.S. Forest Service-Managed Lands

Transitions: 2019 Economic Forecast for Metro Denver February 6, 2019

Characteristics of the Labor Force - Poteau Area

Current Hawaii Economic Conditions. Eugene Tian

The Economic Impact of Colonial Downs in Virginia

Transcription:

PBTC 03-3 VALUES ASSOCIATED WITH THE APALACHICOLA BAY MARINE ECONOMY By Alan W. Hodges and Charles Adams PBTC 03-3 March 2003 POLICY BRIEF SERIES

INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL TRADE AND POLICY CENTER MISSION AND SCOPE: The International Agricultural Trade and Policy Center (IATPC) was established in 1990 in the Food and Resource Economics Department (FRED) of the Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) at the University of Florida. Its mission is to provide information, education, and research directed to immediate and long-term enhancement and sustainability of international trade and natural resource use. Its scope includes not only trade and related policy issues, but also agricultural, rural, resource, environmental, food, state, national and international policies, regulations, and issues that influence trade and development. OBJECTIVES: The Center s objectives are to: Serve as a university-wide focal point and resource base for research on international agricultural trade and trade policy issues Facilitate dissemination of agricultural trade related research results and publications Encourage interaction between researchers, business and industry groups, state and federal agencies, and policymakers in the examination and discussion of agricultural trade policy questions Provide support to initiatives that enable a better understanding of trade and policy issues that impact the competitiveness of Florida and southeastern agriculture specialty crops and livestock in the U.S. and international markets

VALUES ASSOCIATED WITH THE APALACHICOLA BAY MARINE ECONOMY Alan W. Hodges, PhD* and Charles Adams, PhD University of Florida, Food & Resource Economics Department, Gainesville, FL 32611 *tel 352-392-1881 x312; email AWHodges@ufl.edu March 24, 2003 Economic Characteristics of the Apalachicola Bay Region The table below characterizes the economic structure and value of the Apalachicola Bay region, including Gulf, Franklin, Liberty and Wakulla Counties. Total economic output in 1999 (expressed in year 2002 dollars), was $1.40 billion, with total employment of 17,336 jobs, and total value-added personal and business net income of $859 million. The largest economic sectors were manufacturing, services, finance/insurance/real estate, government, and construction, as is typical of the Florida economy in general. Output, Value Added and Employment of the Four County Area of Apalachicola Bay, Florida, by Major Industry Group, 1999* Industry Group Industry Output Employment (jobs) Employee Compen- Proprietor Income Other Property Indirect Business Total Value Added sation Income Tax Agriculture 40.3 1,244.4 5.7 9.4 12.2 2.0 29.4 Mining 0.3 7.5 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 Construction 179.4 1,668.2 36.8 10.1 4.5 1.0 52.3 Manufacturing 155.2 963.1 46.1 6.3 7.8 1.3 61.6 Trans., Com., Public Utilities 124.6 638.0 19.9 4.8 39.1 10.1 73.9 Trade 135.4 3,320.7 57.3 3.0 20.0 18.3 98.6 Finance, Insurance, Real Estate 364.0 1,175.4 82.8 7.4 135.5 27.9 253.6 Services 230.9 4,197.6 100.6 22.7 14.0 4.0 141.4 Government 167.9 3,936.5 130.9 0.0 15.7 0.0 146.6 Other 1.7 184.1 1.9 0.0 (0.2) 0.0 1.7 Totals 1,399.5 17,335.5 482.0 63.8 248.7 64.6 859.2 *Millions of dollars (deflated 2002) except employment. Source: Implan data for Florida counties, MIG, Inc., Stillwater, MN Value and Economic Impact of Commercial Fisheries in the Apalachicola Bay Region As an indication of the value of economic activity at risk due to disruption freshwater flows to the Apalachicola Bay estuary, below are tables and charts showing the volume and value of commercial fisheries landings at Apalachicola reported by National Marine Fisheries Service for 1980-2001. As is evident in the chart, landing volumes and values fluctuate considerably from year to year. The average annual landings over the last past ten years were 7.3 million pounds, valued at $12.2 million. The key commercial species harvested in the region during 2001 were oysters (2.5 million pounds) and shrimp (2 million pounds). The majority of oyster production in Florida (96%) occurs in the Apalachicola Bay region. The economic activity generated by harvesting, processing, and wholesale distribution of oysters and shrimp is an important source of economic activity in the

region. The total economic impact of the seafood industry in the Apalachicola Bay region was estimated based on the annual dockside value of seafood landings averaged over the past 10 years, together with a regional economic model (Implan Pro) and base economic data for Florida counties (MIG, Inc.). This model enables estimation of the indirect effects of input purchased from other businesses, and induced consumer spending by industry employees, as well as the direct effect of raw seafood sales. The total output impact was $22.7 million, the total value added impact was $17.4 million, and the total employment impact was 707 jobs. Economic Impacts of Seafood Landings in the Apalachicola Bay Region* Impact Measure Direct Indirect Induced Total Output ($1000*) 13,695 1,203 7,833 22,731 Value Added ($1000*) 11,829 628 4,957 17,415 Employment (jobs) 575 16 117 707 *Direct effect based on average value of landings during period 1991-2001, expressed in year 2002 dollars. Impact of Wildlife-Related Recreation in the Apalachicola Bay Region of Florida, 2000 As an indication of the recreational value of marine and other natural resources in the Apalachicola Bay region, the following table summarizes the jobs, retail sales, total economic output, and number of permits or visitors in the four counties of Franklin, Gulf, Liberty, and Wakulla for year 2000, by type of recreational activity (hunting, freshwater fishing, saltwater fishing, wildlife viewing). The total economic impacts of all activities in the region include 3,361 jobs, $140 million in retail sales, $236 million in economic output, and 154 thousand visitors or permitted users. Saltwater fishing was by far the most important activity, representing about 86 percent of the output impacts, and Franklin County had the highest share of output impacts (40%). Impact of Wildlife-Related Recreation in the Apalachicola Bay Region of Florida, 2000, by Activity and County, 2000 Activity Franklin Gulf Liberty Wakulla Total Four Counties Jobs Hunting 69 83 62 101 315 Freshwater Fishing 47 121 50 111 329 Saltwater Fishing 1,116 709 24 687 2,536 Wildlife Viewing 36 52 26 67 181 Retail Sales ($1000) All Activities 1,268 965 162 966 3,361 Hunting 1,929 2,331 1,744 2,849 8,853 Freshwater Fishing 2,325 6,074 2,481 5,567 16,447 Saltwater Fishing 47,543 30,223 1,014 29,250 108,031 Wildlife Viewing 1,254 1,792 896 2,331 6,272 All Activities 53,052 40,421 6,134 39,997 139,604 Economic Hunting 2,076 2,509 1,876 3,066 9,528

Impact of Wildlife-Related Recreation in the Apalachicola Bay Region of Florida, 2000, by Activity and County, 2000 Activity Franklin Gulf Liberty Wakulla Total Four Counties Freshwater Fishing 2,498 6,526 2,665 5,981 17,670 Saltwater Fishing 88,783 56,440 1,894 54,622 201,739 Wildlife Viewing 1,324 1,892 946 2,461 6,623 Number Permits or Visitors (1000) All Activities 94,682 67,367 7,381 66,131 235,561 Hunting 1 2 1 2 6 Freshwater Fishing 3 7 4 7 22 Saltwater Fishing 49 31 1 30 112 Wildlife Viewing 3 4 2 6 14 All Activities 57 44 8 45 154 Source: David Harding (Fla. FWCC), Southwick & Associates, USFWS. Note: County level data were estimated from 1996 USFWS survey of hunting, fishing and wildlife watching, restated in year 2000 dollars using the consumer price index, and adjusted for growth in county population and number of permits. County data may have low reliability because the survey sampling was designed to provide statistical estimates at the state level. Commercial Fisheries Landings at Apalachicola, FL, 1981-2001 Year Volume (Millions Pounds) Value (Millions Dollars) 1981 12.0 12.3 1982 9.0 10.2 1983 10.8 14.1 1984 10.8 13.2 1985 10.0 12.4 1986 9.0 12.4 1987 10.5 13.8 1988 5.4 7.0 1989 5.8 7.8 1990 5.0 7.5 1991 5.8 11.6 1993 12.6 7.9 1994 8.3 22.4 1995 4.7 10.2 1996 6.5 14.1 1997 5.6 12.3 1998 6.4 10.7 1999 6.8 10.3 2000 10.3 11.4 2001 6.2 10.9 Source: National Marine Fisheries Service

Million Pounds Million Dollars Commercial Fisheries Landings at Apalachicola, FL, 1981-2001 15 25 20 10 5 15 10 Millions of Pounds Millions of Dollars 5 0 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1994 1996 1998 2000 0 Source: National Marine Fisheries Service