MEETING NOTES Meeting notes - User -.docx. Jiaro Viafara, MPO David Kuharenko, GF Engineering Kim Greendahl, City of GF

Similar documents
Greenway & Trail Users Advisory Group (G&TUAG) Agenda Tuesday, April 8, :00 PM GF Park District, th Avenue South, Grand Forks, ND

City of Charlottesville Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update

Pedestrian Project List and Prioritization

Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning in a Historically Car-Centric Culture: A Focus on Connectivity, Safety, & Accessibility

WALKNBIKE DRAFT PLAN NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE

Bicycle and Pedestrian Chapter TPP Update Overview. TAB September 20, 2017

Castro Valley Municipal Advisory Council March 19, 2018

ADOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase IV Activities APPENDIX B PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INDEX

Watertown Complete Streets Prioritization Plan. Public Meeting #1 December 14, 2017

Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan Pre Bid Meeting Portsmouth, NH August 15, 2013

Improving Cyclist Safety at the Dundas Street West and Sterling Road Intersection

Kelowna On the Move. Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan

Pedestrian, Bicycle and Traffic Calming Strategic Implementation Plan. January 18, 2011

LANCASTER CITY BICYCLE NETWORK

MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary

Commerce Street Complete Street Project from Good Latimer Expressway to Exposition Avenue

Goal 3: Foster an environment of partnerships and collaboration to connect our communities and regions to one another.

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

Rolling Out New Bike Facilities Within the North Bethesda & White Flint Area

PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Bike/Multipurpose Trail Study for Glynn County, Georgia MAY 16, 2016

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

ACTION TRANSMITTAL No

Agenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

APPENDIX D LEVEL OF TRAFFIC STRESS METHODOLOGY

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

Public Works and Infrastructure Committee. General Manager, Transportation Services

TxDOT Bicycle Tourism Trails Study Update. April 2017 BAC Meeting April 10, 2017

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

9/25/2018. Multi-Modal Level of Service (MMLOS) Bianca Popescu, Transportation Planner

Downtown Naples Mobility and Connectivity Study. Naples City Council Presentation January 2017

Major Bike Routes 102 Avenue Workshop April 21, 2015

City Birmingham Multi-Modal Transportation Plan Visioning Workshop Results Meeting

Twin Cities Regional Bicycle System Study

University of Victoria Campus Cycling Plan Terms of Reference. 1.0 Project Description

Hennepin County Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning

September 2017 I City of New Westminster

CHARLOTTE COUNTY-PUNTA GORDA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE (BPAC)

AGENDA ITEM NO. 5b HCAOG TAC meeting of May 8, 2014

City of Waterloo Complete Streets Policy

BICYCLE FACILITIES INVENTORY: SUMMARY REPORT

5. Pedestrian System. Accomplishments Over the Past Five Years

Agency Advisory Group Meeting #3 and Walk Audit Anchorage Non-Motorized Plan

Thank you for attending

Welcome. Thank you for your interest in the Lewis & Clark Viaduct Concept Study

2018 Pedestrian and Bicycle and Safe Routes to School Application for Funding Page 1 of 31

2.0 Existing Conditions

NOTES FROM JUNIOR COUNCIL ORIENTATION SESSION HELD ON MONDAY, JANUARY 22, 2018, AT 3:30 PM IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL

Regional Bicycle System Master Study. Preliminary Results Update

SANTA CLARA COUNTYWIDE BICYCLE PLAN August 2008

2018 Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Application Presentation to Palm Beach TPA BRANT BRIDGE CONNECTION LOOP EXTENSION ON CARL BOLTER DR

Living Streets Policy

Pennsylvania Avenue (CR 484) Design Alternatives Study

Stakeholder Update. Agenda. Project update Needs Identification Strategy Proposed needs Safety Collectors/Arterials Greenways Local roads

Montford Drive Parking & Circulation Study

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION

THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF CENTRAL SAANICH. COMMITTEES - 7:00 PM Monday, April 27, 2015 Council Chambers AGENDA

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

Gordon Proctor Director Policy on Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel on ODOT Owned or Maintained Facilities

Proposed White Flint Separated Bike Lane Network September 2015

BIKE PLAN CONTENTS GATEWAY

Bikeway action plan. Bicycle Friendly Community Workshop March 5, 2007 Rochester, MN

US 41 COMPLETE STREETS CORRIDOR PLANNING STUDY from University Parkway to Whitfield Avenue

PROJECT FACT SHEET March 21, 2018

City Snapshot September 27, 2018

Bicycle Lanes Planning, Design, Funding South Mountain Partnership Trails Workshop Roy Gothie PennDOT Statewide Bicycle Pedestrian Coordinator

Rail Station Fact Sheet University of Dallas Station

2016 Neighborhood Street Fund Application

General Design Factors

VIII. Project Prioritization & Implementation

Scope of Services BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN PLAN FOR THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY MPO

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

Safe Streets. City of Lake Forest Park. March 21, 2017

PROJECT OVERVIEW. 20th Avenue Project Limits (Lincoln Way to Wawona St)

Columbia Pike Implementation Team (CPIT) Meeting

ACTION TRANSMITTAL No

Table of Contents Introduction. 2 Purpose of the Plan...2 The Benefits of Walking and Bicycling...3 Vision and Goals of the Plan...

HARRISON STREET/OAKLAND AVENUE COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

Chapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails

Members Present Mr. Gary Thomas, Mr. Dave Martinez, Mr. Robert Massaro, Ms. Jody Van Curen, Mr. Dan Hill and Ms. Joan Shaffer

Active Transportation Rail to River Corridor. Community Meeting - Segment A

El Centro Mobility Hub

2.0 LANE WIDTHS GUIDELINE

Almon Street Bike Lane Planning

Urbana Pedestrian Master Plan

Tonight is for you. Learn everything you can. Share all your ideas.

Portland International Airport Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (October 2003) Staff Acknowledgements

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE

Complete Streets Workshop Follow-up. April 27, 2011 Rockledge City Hall

MONTGOMERY COUNTY COUNCIL

TOWN OF PORTLAND, CONNECTICUT COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

CITY OF CAMBRIDGE 2015 BICYCLE PLAN TOWARDS A BIKABLE FUTURE

C C C

City of Tacoma Bicycle and Pedestrian Technical Advisory Group (BPTAG) Minutes

CRESTON ROAD COMPLETE AND SUSTAINABLE STREETS CORRIDOR PLAN

Transcription:

Bicycle, Pedestrian & Greenway Advisory Committee (BPGAC) Wednesday, September 12, 2016 7:00 PM GF City Hall, 255 North 4 th Street, Grand Forks, ND Room A102 MEETING NOTES Wes Rogers Jane Croeker Richard O Connor Bethany Satrom Jiaro Viafara, MPO David Kuharenko, GF Engineering Kim Greendahl, City of GF i. Bikeway items A. MPO: ii. Bike Map Mobile App: The MPO has been working with the GF City GIS staff to offer an electronic app of the bikeway map. Please review online map and send comments to Jairo by September 19. The MPO will continue to offer a paper map for distribution. iii. Request for assistance in ranking selected roadways: The proposed Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan has been distributed to stakeholders for comment. So far only the GF engineering department has commented on the plan. Suggestions from the engineering department were: South 20 th Street and South 17 th Street - support a route only. These streets are too narrow for any on-road facilities. Chestnut and Walnut - support a route only. These streets are too narrow for any on-road facilities. Discussion: Could sharrows be added to Belmont Road for a north south bikeway connection instead of a route on Chestnut or Walnut Streets? Belmont Road seems narrower than University Avenue, which would eliminate the sharrow option. That s why engineering chose Chestnut and Walnut Streets instead. Could Reeves Drive be an option? Yes, but that only covers from 4 th Avenue South to 13 th Avenue south and nothing further south. Crossing beacons at the Chestnut and Walnut intersections at 4 th Avenue South made these streets more appealing for a bike route. Concerns of traffic on South 20 th Street. Walnut dead ends on 17 th. Chestnut goes all the way through to Terrace Drive but not to 47 th Avenue South and beyond. The section of Belmont Road north of 13 th Avenue South has a lot of heavy truck traffic. Motion #1: Accept the engineering recommendations for designating South 20 th and South 17 th Streets as bicycle routes. M/S/A Jane/Wes Motion #2: Table discussion on the Chestnut Street, Walnut Street, and Belmont Road options until the October meeting to allow riders to review the options. MSA Jane/Richard. B. GF Engineering: Page 1 of 2 9-12-18 Meeting notes - User -.docx

ii. Transportation Alternative Program (TAP): The application cycle for consideration for TAP funds has begun. Suggestions for potential projects should be sent to David for consideration. Past funding cycles results: 17 th Avenue South in front of Red River High School awarded and in design stage University Avenue from Technology Circle to North 55 th Street not awarded; likely reapply fall 2018 47 th Avenue South from South 20 th Street to South Columbia Road - Constructed with 47th Ave S Reconstruction Project South Columbia Road from South 40 th Street to South 47 th Street not awarded; likely reapply fall 2018 David will be asking this group for a letter of support for the upcoming round of funding requests next month. iv. Greenway items A. Skate park update: The contractor is finishing up the landscaping around the park. A grand opening is scheduled for Sunday, September 23. B. Kennedy & Railroad Bridge updates: The plan is to be done with the bridge work in the next few months, weather permitting. There will still be some site cleanup and turf restoration next spring but the bridge will be open for vehicle traffic. The group suggested leaving the temporary trail in place because it is at a higher elevation and might not collect water and ice like the lower trail. v. Other A. Freezeway: Kim has not heard from the planner yet. Todd Feland plans to schedule a meeting with the planner to discuss the upcoming season. vi. Next meeting date: 7PM,Wednesday, October 10, 2018, GF City Hall, 255 North 4th Street, Grand Forks, ND Room A102 Notes submitted by: Kim Greendahl, Greenway Specialist Supporting documents: 2018 Bikeway System Map Application Road Prioritization Ranking Assistance Request Road Prioritization Ranking Criteria 8/18/2018 Greenway Technical Committee meeting DRAFT agenda Page 2 of 2 9-12-18 Meeting notes - User -.docx

MPO Staff Report Bicycle, Pedestrian and Greenway Advisory Committee, September 12, 2018 RECOMMENDED ACTION Request for Assistance from Greenway Users Group/ Proposed Bicycle Facilities Matter of Request for Assistance from Greenway Users Group BACKGROUND: As part of the update of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan, criteria were developed to help in the ranking and prioritization of the segments proposed to close gaps, improve access and connectivity in the bicycle system. MPO staff is asking for your assistance in ranking and prioritizing the following segments according to the methodology suggested. The objective is to assist staff in the decision on whether to include or remove those facilities from further consideration as part of the proposed Bicycle and Pedestrian Network. ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS OF FACT: The following corridors are under consideration: Belmont Road from 5 th Ave. S to 32 nd Ave. S Chestnut St. from 1 st Ave. S to 32 nd Ave. S Walnut St. from 1 st Ave. S to 17 th Ave. S S 20 th Street from DeMers Ave. to 32 nd Ave. S S 17 th Street from DeMers Ave. to 32 nd Ave. S This proposed methodology suggests that stakeholders do: a) Evaluate each one of the Corridors under consideration. b) Assign a score ranging from 5 (Strongly Support) to 1 (Strongly Disagree) to each of the corridors under consideration. The highest score any corridor could attain is 35 points. The lowest score any project could attain is 7 points. c) Determine the Total Score d) Proceed to determine the Ranking corresponding to the selected corridor. Proposed scores range from 35-28 points (High ) to 14-7 (Low ) points. Stakeholders are encouraged to choose ONE preferred corridor from either of the TWO PAIRS provided for further consideration as a proposed facility : Chestnut St. OR Walnut St S 17th St. OR S 20th St SUPPORT MATERIALS: Ranking and Prioritization Criteria/Scoring Sheets

Table 8. SUGGESTED INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT EVALUATION CRITERIA* CRITERION MEASUREMENT RELATED STANDARDS 1 Closing Gaps To what degree does the project fill a missing gap or overcome a barrier in the 3.1.2 3.3.2 4.2.1 4.3.1 4.3.3 current system? Does it improve significant crossings? Can the project improve walking and bicycling conditions at locations with perceived 2 Safety & Comfort or documented safety issues? Does the project make cycling and walking appealing 8.1.3 8.3.2 to all users? How many user generators does the project connect within a reasonable walking or 3 Access & Mobility/Land Use cycling distance? Are adjacent land uses supportive of walking and bicycling? To what 1.1.1 5.1.1 8.3.2 9.1.3 degree will the project generate users? 4 Multimodal Connections To what degree does the project integrate walking and cycling into the existing transit 3.3.1 3.3.2 6.1.1 8.5.4 system? Does the project enable the use of multiple active transportation modes? 5 Implementation What is the ease of implementation? Is funding available? Is additional right-of-way required? Are negotiations required over parking availability, signage, etc.? 6.2.1 6.2.2 To what degree does the project offer potential benefits to the regional community 6 Community Benefits by offering opportunities for increased connectivity to parks, natural scenic beauty, 4.1.1 4.2.1 7.1.4 1.1.1 3.1.1 and activity centers? To what extent does the project increase physical activity, regardless of travel 7 Health Outcomes 4.3.1 4.3.2 4.3.3 purpose? To what extent does the project improve other determinants of health? *Adopted from: Clark County, WA Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (2010). Alta Planning & Design

Ranking & Prioritization Criteria PROPOSED SCORING SCALE PROJECT PRIORITY RANKING CRITERION Strongly Support Agree with Project Neither Agree nor Disagree Disagree with Project Strongly Disagree High Mid Low 1 Closing Gaps 5 4 3 2 1 35-28 21-14 14-7 2 Safety & Comfort 5 4 3 2 1 35-28 21-14 14-7 3 Access & Mobility/Land Use 5 4 3 2 1 35-28 21-14 14-7 4 Multimodal Connections 5 4 3 2 1 35-28 21-14 14-7 5 Implementation 5 4 3 2 1 35-28 21-14 14-7 6 Community Benefits 5 4 3 2 1 35-28 21-14 14-7 7 Health Outcomes 5 4 3 2 1 35-28 21-14 14-7 SCORE 35 28 21 14 7 35-28 21-14 14-7

RANKING & PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA CORRIDOR SCORING SHEET Corridor Closing Gaps Safety & Comfort Access & Mobility/ Land Use Multimodal Connections Community Benefits Health Outcomes TOTAL SCORE High 35-28 Mid 21-14 S 20th St Demers-11th Ave S 11th Ave S-32nd Ave S Belmont Road 5th Ave S-13th Ave S 13th Ave S-15th Ave S 15th Ave S-17th Ave S 17th Ave-32nd Ave Chesnut St 1st Ave S-5th Ave S 5th Ave S-13th Ave S 13th Ave S-15th Ave S 15th Ave S-17th Ave S 17th Ave-32nd Ave Walnut St 1st Ave S-13th Ave S 13th Ave S-17th Ave S S 17th St Demers-20th Ave S 20th Ave S-24th Ave S 24th Ave S-32nd Ave S Low 14-7

MPO Staff Report Bicycle, Pedestrian and Greenway Advisory Committee, September 12, 2018 RECOMMENDED ACTION Progress Report -- For Information Only Matter of the Release of the 2018 Bikeway System Map Application BACKGROUND: Every year the Grand Forks-East Grand Forks MPO updates, produces and distributes a new PRINTED version of the Bikeway Map. This year, the 2018 Bikeway Map version includes an ELECTRONIC Application. This tool was prepared by the City of Grand Forks Geographical Information System as the request of MPO s staff. The preparation of the Bikeway s Electronic Application is an effort to fulfill various objectives illustrated in the proposed Bicycle and Pedestrian Element (currently under preparation). These include: Goal 3: Accessibility & Mobility: Objective 1 Improve bike and pedestrian maps to facilitate user s access, connections, mobility and regular enjoyment of the system Objective 3 -- Increase access to the sidewalk network and bicycle system facilities for all users and assist them in ensuring mobility, well-being and quality of life without undue burden placed on any community. ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS OF FACT: The printed version of the 2018 Bikeway Map was released in April, 2018. The Electronic Application is meant to be a simple tool for users to find features of the bikeway around Grand Forks. The map displays bike lanes, routes, multi-use paths, sharrows, unpaved trails, bike repair facilities, and other points of interest. There are several ways that users can find what is around them. Using the Near Me tool in the upper right hand corner, users can use the search bar to find an address and adjust the slider to find facilities with a certain distance of an address. Users can accomplish the same by clicking on the pin icon next to the search bar then clicking on the map in the area of interest they are looking for, or you can also click on the My Location icon on the left hand side of the map to see their current location as a reference to then place a pin on the map. Users will be presented with a list of features within the set distance that you can browse through. The application works on a Personal Computer (PC), Tablet or Mobile Phone. SUPPORT MATERIALS: This electronic application can be found at: https://gfgis.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=f3532b3fe6c54df8a7fc7f78f8a4e1bb

Greenway Technical Committee (GTC) 10AM Tuesday, September 18, 2018 Icon Sport Center, 1060 47th Ave South, Park District Agenda I. Old Business A. Picture Post project update B. Trail cams C. Report vandalism signs D. Nissan bench approval request for biblical verse E. Wildlife population meeting update II. III. IV. New Business Agency Updates A. City of EGF: B. GF Park District: C. City of GF: D. Minnesota DNR: Other V. Next meeting: Greenway Technical Committee: 10AM on Tuesday, October 16, Icon Sport Center, 1060 47th Ave South, Blue Line Club Room VI. VII. Adjournment Upcoming events & meetings Bicycle, Pedestrian & Greenway Advisory Group: 7PM Wednesday, October 10. GF City Hall, 255 North 4th Street, Grand Forks, ND Room A101 Scheels group casual bike ride: 5:30 PM Every Wednesday, Lincoln Drive Park Scheels group road bike ride: 5:30 PM Every Wednesday, Lincoln Drive Park Supporting documents: Picture Post webpage Trail system sign plan 2009 Copy of Nissan bench request Rollin on the River special event application Picture of Nissan Cube car Page 1 of 1 9-18-2018 Agenda - Tech.docx