I. Project Title: Yampa River northern pike and smallmouth bass removal and translocation

Similar documents
FY 2012 ANNUAL PROJECT REPORT PROJECT NUMBER: 123-b. I. Project Title: Nonnative fish control in the middle Green River

I. Project Title: Upper Yampa River northern pike management and monitoring

FY 2015 ANNUAL PROJECT REPORT PROJECT NUMBER: 163

FY 2012 ANNUAL PROJECT REPORT PROJECT NUMBER: 125

FY 2013 ANNUAL PROJECT REPORT PROJECT NUMBER: _125

Nonnative Fish Management River Specific Fact Sheets 2010

U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Moab Field Station Vernal, UT S. Hwy 191 Suite 4 (435) x14 Moab, UT 84532

FY 2013 ANNUAL PROJECT REPORT PROJECT NUMBER: 123-b. I. Project Title: Nonnative fish control in the middle Green River

I. Project Title: J. W. Mumma Native Aquatic Species Restoration Facility Operation and Maintenance - Colorado

I. Project Title: Annual Operation and Maintenance of the Fish Passage Structure at the Redlands Diversion Dam on the Gunnison River

Expected Funding Source: I. Title of Proposal: Nonnative fish control in the Green River, Dinosaur National Monument, and Desolation/Gray Canyons.

I. Project Title: Annual Operation and Maintenance of the Fish Passage Structure at the Government Highline Diversion Dam on the Upper Colorado River

Northern pike management studies in the Yampa River, Colorado,

Colorado River Fishery Project

COLORADO RIVER RECOVERY PROGRAM RECOVERY PROGRAM FY 2015 ANNUAL PROJECT REPORT PROJECT NUMBER: 160

FY 2016 ANNUAL PROJECT REPORT PROJECT NUMBER: 125

July 11, Mr. Mike King Executive Director Colorado Department of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman Street, Room 718 Denver, CO 80203

FY 2010 ANNUAL PROJECT REPORT PROJECT NUMBER: FR- 115

I. Project Title: Monitoring effects of Flaming Gorge Dam releases on the Lodore and Whirlpool Canyon fish communities

FY 2017 ANNUAL PROJECT REPORT NUMBER: C29a/138

1165 S Hwy 191, Suite S 2350 W Moab, UT Vernal, UT

V. Study Schedule: Scheduled to continue for the length of the Recovery Program.

Rock Creek Huntington County Supplemental Evaluation

Escapement rates of translocated smallmouth bass. (Micropterus dolomieu) from Elkhead Reservoir to the Yampa River

COLORADO RIVER RECOVERY PROGRAM RECOVERY PROGRAM FY 2018 ANNUAL PROJECT REPORT PROJECT NUMBER: 169

RECOVERY PROGRAM Recovery Program Project Number: 110 FY SCOPE OF WORK for: Smallmouth bass control in the lower Yampa River

I. Project Title: Monitoring effects of Flaming Gorge Dam releases on the Lodore and Whirlpool Canyon fish communities

* * * * * * * * * * * *

Peace River Water Use Plan. Monitoring Program Terms of Reference. GMSMON-1 Peace River Creel Survey

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

Rainy Lake Open-water Creel Survey:

COLORADO RIVER RECOVERY PROGRAM RECOVERY PROGRAM FY 2017 ANNUAL PROJECT REPORT PROJECT NUMBER: 167

Quemahoning Reservoir

Bureau of Reclamation Agreement Number(s): R15PG400083

Fish at the table and in the river: Nearing a quarter-century in the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program

Current Status and Management Recommendations for the Fishery in the Cloverleaf Chain of Lakes

I. Project Title: Evaluation of walleye removal in the upper Colorado River Basin

I. Project Title: Removal of Smallmouth Bass in the Upper Colorado River between Price-Stubb Dam near Palisade, Colorado, and Westwater, Utah.

TABLE ROCK LAKE 2014 ANNUAL LAKE REPORT. Shane Bush Fisheries Management Biologist Missouri Department of Conservation Southwest Region

Riverine Fish Flow Investigations

Arizona Game and Fish Department Region VI Fisheries Program

MIDDLE FORK RESERVOIR Wayne County 2006 Fish Management Report. Christopher C. Long Assistant Fisheries Biologist

Michigan Department of Natural Resources Status of the Fishery Resource Report Page 1

LAKE DIANE Hillsdale County (T8-9S, R3W, Sections 34, 3, 4) Surveyed May Jeffrey J. Braunscheidel

Comprehensive Fisheries Survey of High Falls Reservoir, Marinette County Wisconsin during 2004 and Waterbody Identification Code

INLAND LAKE MANAGEMENT REPORT FY Spring 2008

Crawford Reservoir. FISH SURVEY AND MANAGEMENT INFORMATION Eric Gardunio, Fish Biologist Montrose Service Center

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

EVALUATION OF POPULATION ESTIMATES FOR COLORADO PIKEMINNOW AND HUMPBACK CHUB IN THE UPPER COLORADO RIVER BASIN

Oregon Chapter American Fisheries Society Nongame Native Fish Workshop. Tiller, OR 9/13/16

Charter Boat Fishing in Lake Michigan: 2017 Illinois Reported Harvest

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

Nonnative Fish Management Questions and Answers 2012 (Utah)

July 24, Kalispel Tribe of Indians Update on Efforts to Suppress Northern Pike and Policy Implications

Fisheries Survey of White Rapids Flowage, Marinette County Wisconsin during Waterbody Identification Code

Cedar Lake Comprehensive Survey Report Steve Hogler and Steve Surendonk WDNR-Mishicot

Burns Paiute Tribe Fisheries Department. Evaluate The Life History Of Native Salmonids Within The Malheur Subbasin Project #

SAN JUAN RIVER BASIN RECOVERY IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM

MIDDLE FORK RESERVOIR Wayne County 2004 Fish Management Report. Christopher C. Long Assistant Fisheries Biologist

Nonnative Fish Management Questions and Answers 2012 (Colorado)

Life History Study of the Alligator Gar in the Ouachita River, Arkansas

JadEco, LLC PO BOX 445 Shannon, IL 61078

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT FEDERAL AID JOB PROGRESS REPORTS F EUREKA COUNTY Small Lakes and Reservoirs

Northern Pike Removal, Smallmouth Bass Monitoring, and Native Fish Monitoring in the Yampa River, Hayden to Craig Reach,

REEL FACTS. Regulations. Limblines Fishing with limblines and set hooks is prohibited at Lake Washington.

FY 2018 ANNUAL PROJECT REPORT PROJECT NUMBER: C-20

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Fisheries Division, Lake Superior Area

Don Pedro Project Relicensing

Charter Boat Fishing in Lake Michigan: 2015 Illinois Reported Harvest

A SURVEY OF 1997 COLORADO ANGLERS AND THEIR WILLINGNESS TO PAY INCREASED LICENSE FEES

Alaska Sustainable Salmon Fund Statement of Work

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

Colorado River near Parshall

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

FISHERIES MANAGEMENT. Georgia Freshwater Fisheries. Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division

Introduction: JadEco, LLC PO BOX 445 Shannon, IL 61078

LAKE TANEYCOMO 2011 ANNUAL LAKE REPORT

2014 Island Lake Survey June 13 th, 2014 Andrew Plauck District Fisheries Biologist Report Prepared 4 March 2015

C R I TFC. Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission

Job 3. Title: Coordinate with other studies, process and analyze data; write reports.

Alaska Sustainable Salmon Fund Statement of Work

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

2016 Annual Work Plan

Potomac River Muskellunge

Lake Taneycomo Fisheries Management. Shane Bush : Fisheries Management Biologist

Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program Upper Colorado River and San Juan River Basins January 19-20, 2005, Grand Junction Colorado ABSTRACTS

GRANT F-48-R. Investigations and Management of New Jersey s Freshwater Fisheries Resources FINAL REPORT JOB I-5


STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

Consultation History

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

COMMISSION ORDER 40: FISH MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS

Susquehanna River Walleye Fishery

December 18, Dear Sir/Madam,

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE SPORT FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FISH MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES DELAVAN LAKE SPRING 2012

BOGUS CREEK SALMON STUDIES 2002

SURVIVAL OF HATCHERY-REARED RAZORBACK SUCKERS XYRAUCHEN

and Working Together to Recover Endangered Fishes Nonnative Fish: The Greatest Threat to Recovery

Transcription:

COLORADO RIVER RECOVERY PROGRAM FY 2004 ANNUAL PROJECT REPORT RECOVERY PROGRAM PROJECT NUMBER: 98a I. Project Title: Yampa River northern pike and smallmouth bass removal and translocation II. III. Principal Investigator(s): John Hawkins John.Hawkins@ColoState.EDU Larval Fish Laboratory (970) 491-2777 Dept. Fishery and Wildlife Biology (970) 491-5091 fax 1474 Campus Mail Colorado State University Ft Collins, CO 80523 Assistants: Cameron Walford and Tasha Sorensen Project Summary: This study was an evaluation of whether northern pike and smallmouth bass numbers can be controlled through active removal from a large section of critical habitat in the Yampa River. We sampled the river using two electrofishing boats sampling each shoreline on six different sampling occasions. To evaluate removal success, we calculated the size of the population using a mark-recapture method. All pike were tagged and released on the first sample occasion and the recaptures on the second sample occasion were used to estimate the population size. Northern pike were removed on the second through sixth sample occasions and transported to either Rio Blanco Reservoir or Loudy Simpson Ponds. Only a portion of the study reach was sampled on the last (6 th ) sample occasion due to low water conditions. Smallmouth bass were marked and released on the first sample occasion in three study areas. Two of these study sites were in the Juniper reach. One was a 12- mile control reach were smallmouth bass were always marked and released. The other 12-mile study area in Juniper was a treatment area and after the first marking occasion, all smallmouth bass were removed on 9 additional occasions from the treatment site. A third study area was in Lily Park. It was 5 miles long, and after the first marking occasion, smallmouth bass were removed on five additional occasions. Objectives listed below were met and this project is scheduled to continue until 2006. IV. Study Schedule: Initial Year: 1999 Final Year: 2006 V. Relationship to RIPRAP: Green River Action Plan: Yampa and Little Snake Rivers III. Reduce negative impacts of nonnative fishes and sportfish management activities. III.A.1. Implement Yampa Basin aquatic wildlife management plan. III.A.1.b.(1) Remove and translocate northern pike and other sportfish from the Yampa Middle Yampa Pike/Bass 98a page 1

III.A.1.d. River. Remove and translocate smallmouth bass. VI. Accomplishment of FY 2004 Tasks and Deliverables, Discussion of Initial Findings and Shortcomings: Northern pike The goal is to remove as many pike as possible from critical habitat and estimate the fraction of the population removed. Objectives 1. Obtain an estimate of the number of northern pike that reside in the 95-mile study reach in the Yampa River using a mark-recapture abundance estimator. 2. Remove a large portion of the estimated population of northern pike from the study reach during five removal passes. 3. Calculate the proportion of northern pike removed based on initial population size. Smallmouth bass The goal is to remove as many smallmouth bass as possible from a 12-mile treatment reach and a 5-mile concentration reach and estimate the fraction of the population removed from each reach. Objectives: 1. Obtain an estimate of the number of smallmouth bass in the control and treatment reaches in Little Yampa Canyon and the 5-mile reach in Lily Park using a markrecapture abundance estimator. 2. Remove a large portion of the estimated population of smallmouth bass from the 12-mile treatment reach in Little Yampa Canyon and the 5-mile concentration area in Lily Park. 3. Calculate the proportion of smallmouth bass removed from each study area based on initial population size and compare capture rates between control and treatment reaches. 4. Evaluate movement of tagged smallmouth bass from the control reach to ensure that immigration or emigration does not confound comparisons between control and treatment site. See Appendix for data tables and figures. We were able to achieve our stated objectives to obtain abundance estimates for each species and study group. We are still analyzing movement data for both northern pike and smallmouth bass. Marked fish of both species in 2003 will provide additional data on movement within this study reach and movement to other reaches both up and downstream of this study. Abundance Middle Yampa Pike/Bass 98a page 2

estimates for smallmouth bass remain to be calculated but will be available by the nonnative workshop on Dec 8 th, 2004. VII. Recommendations: 1. Continue with same study design in 2005. 2. Establish early communication between and within affected agencies. 3. Develop and provide a consistent message for agencies and the affected public. VIII. Project Status: The project accomplished an intensive removal program that almost doubled sampling occasions compared to 2003. Low water conditions prevented a final sample in July. The Colorado Division of Wildlife assisted with portions of northern pike removal in Maybell and Lily Park reaches, doing three samples in those two reaches and at least one in Juniper. They also transported fish they captured to receiving waters. This project and several other nonnative fish management projects will be reviewed in a workshop scheduled for Dec 8, 2004 and work will be revised based on those finding and discussions. IX. FY 2004 Budget Status A. Funds Provided: $241,000 B. Funds Expended: $193,000 C. Difference: $48,000 D. Percent of the FY 2004 work completed, and projected costs to complete: 80% completed; cost to complete $48,000 E. Recovery Program funds spent for publication charges: $0 X. Status of Data Submission (Where applicable): Data will be submitted with the final report. Colorado pikeminnow tag data will be submitted to data base manager by the end of calendar year. XI. Signed: John Hawkins 11/09/04 Principal Investigator Date Submitted electronically. Version control: submitted 11/09/04 by JAH Middle Yampa Pike/Bass 98a page 3

APPENDIX: Data tables and figures Table 1 Number and biomass (in parentheses) of targeted species captured in the middle Yampa River, between South Beach boat ramp (RM 134.5) and Little Snake River (RM 51), 2004. NA means data not available at time of reporting, but will be provided. Northern Pike Smallmouth Bass Colorado Pikeminnow Number of individual fish handled Returned to river with mark 819 (950 kg) 155 b (198 kg) Translocated 633 (707 kg) 3,514 (NA) 27 a (47 kg) NA 25 (47 kg) NA 0 Died 31 (45 kg) 91 c 2 (1 kg) a Of 27 individual Colorado pikeminnow captured 29% (n=8) had evidence of injuries from pike attacks. Six Colorado pikeminnow were captured more than once. b Northern pike were stocked into Rio Blanco Reservoir and Loudy Simpson Park Ponds. A small number were provided to CDOW Aquatic researcher Pat Martinez for diet and bioenergetics analysis. All pike > 200 mm TL were tagged with Floy tags and 103 pike < 200 mm TL were not tagged, even though they were all translocated. c Sixty-two smallmouth bass died during holding and another 29 bass were provided to a Colorado Division of Wildlife researcher for diet and isotopic analysis. Middle Yampa Pike/Bass 98a page 4

Table 2 Total miles sampled for northern pike in the middle Yampa River, 2004. Reach Juniper 43 54 55 60 48 36 296 Springs Maybell 19 19 18 17 18 0 91 Lily Park 4 4 4 4 4 3 23 Total 66 77 77 81 70 39 410 Table 3 Boat electrofishing effort (hrs) for northern pike in the middle Yampa River, 2004. Reach Juniper 42 59 45 61 48 40 295 Maybell 11 11 13 15 13 0 64 Lily Park 3 5 4 5 7 4 28 Total 56 75 63 81 69 44 388 Middle Yampa Pike/Bass 98a page 5

Table 4 Number of northern pike captured in the middle Yampa River, 2004. Juniper 99 159 57 51 57 28 451 Maybell 40 54 33 18 30 -- 175 Lily Park 12 7 8 6 21 1 55 Total 151 220 98 75 108 29 681 Table 5 Biomass of northern pike captured in the middle Yampa River, 2004. Juniper 114 172 84 57 66 27 521 Maybell 80 106 45 28 48 0 306 Lily Park 21 15 15 16 52 3 123 Total 215 293 144 102 166 30 950 Middle Yampa Pike/Bass 98a page 6

Table 6 Abundance estimate (N-hat) for northern pike > 200 mm TL in the middle Yampa River, 2004. Lincoln-Petersen a (2-pass mark-recapture) N-hat standard error 95% Confidence Interval 1,513 207 1,107 1,918 4-pass removal b 783 65 684 961 a b Estimate based on 159 pike marked on first sample occasion and 226 pike recaptured on second sample occasion, including 36 recaptures. Estimate based on removal of 227, 103, 79, and 117 pike on sample occasions 2 5. Table 7 Number of smallmouth bass handled in the middle Yampa River, 2004. NA means data not available at time of reporting, but will be provided. Juniper Lily Park Maybell a Number of Individual Fish handled Returned to river with mark 2,167 b 1,346 4 NA NA 4 Translocated NA NA 0 Died 57 (+24) c 38 a Captures of smallmouth bass in Maybell represent recaptured fish. b In Juniper, 574 individual bass were handled in the control study site and 1,600 individual smallmouth bass were handled in the treatment study site. c Twenty-four smallmouth bass provided to Colorado Division of Wildlife researcher for diet and isotopic analysis. Middle Yampa Pike/Bass 98a page 7