BRRAKING WAVE FORCES ON WALLS

Similar documents
( max)o Wind Waves 10 Short Swell (large wave steepness) 25 Long Swell (small wave steepness) 75

Examples of Carter Corrected DBDB-V Applied to Acoustic Propagation Modeling

Kelly Legault, Ph.D., P.E. USACE SAJ

Characterizing The Surf Zone With Ambient Noise Measurements

High-Frequency Scattering from the Sea Surface and Multiple Scattering from Bubbles

Air-Sea Interaction Spar Buoy Systems

DEVELOPMENT OF PRIMARY FRAGMENTATION SEPARATION DISTANCES FOR CASED CYLINDRICAL MUNITIONS

Waves, Turbulence and Boundary Layers

Rogue Wave Statistics and Dynamics Using Large-Scale Direct Simulations

PREDICTION OF ERODED VERSUS ACCRETED BEACHES

Internal Waves and Mixing in the Aegean Sea

Remote Monitoring of Dolphins and Whales in the High Naval Activity Areas in Hawaiian Waters

AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF SPILLING BREAKERS

TITLE: Assessing the Hydrodynamic Performance of Fouling-Release Surfaces (ONR Research Contract # N WR )

z Interim Report for May 2004 to October 2005 Aircrew Performance and Protection Branch Wright-Patterson AFB, OH AFRL-HE-WP-TP

Waves, Bubbles, Noise, and Underwater Communications

AFRL-RX-WP-TP

Long-Term Autonomous Measurement of Ocean Dissipation with EPS-MAPPER

Stability & Control Aspects of UCAV Configurations

Global Ocean Internal Wave Database

Internal Waves in Straits Experiment Progress Report

Navy Shipbuilding Industrial Base

AFT'LICATION OF M3vABLE-RED F'HYSICAL MODHIS To FBED1crslWM-INDUCED ERmIoN

Imaging the Lung Under Pressure

Using SolidWorks & CFD to Create The Next Generation Airlocks

High Frequency Acoustical Propagation and Scattering in Coastal Waters

DoD Coral Reef Protection and Management Program

AFRL-RH-WP-TR

Temporary Flying Restrictions Due to Exogenous Factors

Marine Mammal Acoustic Tracking from Adapting HARP Technologies

Determination Of Nearshore Wave Conditions And Bathymetry From X-Band Radar Systems

M2.50-cal. Multishot Capabilities at the US Army Research Laboratory

Determination of Nearshore Wave Conditions and Bathymetry from X-Band Radar Systems

Development of Low Volume Shape Memory Alloy Variable Ballast System for AUV Use

OE Barricade Guide Development. Michelle Crull, PhD, PE Wallace Watanabe James Manthey, PE Charles Barker, PE

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Aircraft Fuel Cell Repair Equipment

Technical Note AN EMPIRICAL. METHOD FOR DESIGN OF BREAKWATERS AS SHORE PROTECTION STRUCTURES

Ocean waves and shock waves

OECS Regional Engineering Workshop September 29 October 3, 2014

Observations of Near-Bottom Currents with Low-Cost SeaHorse Tilt Current Meters

Implementation of Structures in the CMS: Part IV, Tide Gate

Calculation of the Internal Blast Pressures for Tunnel Magazine Tests

Behavioral Response of Dolphins to Signals Simulating Mid-Frequency Sonar

Coastal Engineering Technical Note

Three Dimensional Shallow Water Adaptive Hydraulics (ADH-SW3): Waterborne Vessels

C/JU,TING TIDAL EL FVATION PROBABILITIES

LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS FOR WAVE RUN-UP ON THE TETRAPOD ARMOURED RUBBLE MOUND STRUCTURE WITH A STEEP FRONT SLOPE

WAVE PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION ON PERMEABLE VERTICAL WALLS

Next Generation Modeling for Deep Water Wave Breaking and Langmuir Circulation

Adib R. Farsoun. U.S. Army Engineer Division, Huntsville 106 Wynn Dr. Huntsville, AL ABSTRACT

Concrete Obstacle Vulnerability

NONLINEAR INTERNAL WAVES IN THE SOUTH CHINA SEA

Inlet Influence on the Pressure and Temperature Distortion Entering the Compressor of an Air Vehicle

Analysis of Packery Channel Public Access Boat Ramp Shoreline Failure

Chapter 4 EM THE COASTAL ENGINEERING MANUAL (Part I) 1 August 2008 (Change 2) Table of Contents. Page. I-4-1. Background...

Tedious Creek Small Craft Harbor: CGWAVE Model Comparisons Between Existing and Authorized Breakwater Configurations

Waves, Bubbles, Noise and Underwater Communications

Nearshore Wave-Topography Interactions

Rip Currents Onshore Submarine Canyons: NCEX Analysis

THE NEW DDESB BLAST EFFECTS COMPUTER

Regional Analysis of Extremal Wave Height Variability Oregon Coast, USA. Heidi P. Moritz and Hans R. Moritz

Acoustic Focusing in Shallow Water and Bubble Radiation Effects

Anthropogenic Noise and the Marine Environment

Three Dimensional Modeling of Breaking

Frostbite in Ski Boots for Marines

The Influence of Breaking at the Ocean Surface on Oceanic Radiance and Imaging

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

PHYSICAL MOMTORING OF NEARSHORE SANDBERMS

Structure Failure Modes

RIP CURRENTS. Award # N

ENGINEERING STUDY OF INLET ENTRANCE HYDRODYNAMICS: GRAYS HARBOR, WASHINGTON, USA

The Continued Development of the Third-Generation Shallow Water Wave Model "Swan"

Observations of Velocity Fields Under Moderately Forced Wind Waves

The Failure of the Kamaishi Tsunami Protection Breakwater

National Shoreline Erosion Control Demonstration Program Overview

STUDIES OF FINITE AMPLITUDE SHEAR WAVE INSTABILITIES. James T. Kirby. Center for Applied Coastal Research. University of Delaware.

Evaluating the Design Safety of Highway Structural Supports

CHAPTER 135. Influence of the core configuration on the stability of berm breakwaters. Nikolay Lissev 1 AlfT0rum 2

Understanding the Dynamics of Shallow-Water Oceanographic Moorings

Hydro-Thermal Vent Mapping with Multiple AUV's AZORES-2001

SHOCK WAVE PROPAGATION THROUGH AERATED WATER

Coastal Engineering Technical Note

Shoreline Change Modeling Using One-Line Models: Application and Comparison of GenCade, Unibest, and Litpack

Monitoring Completed Navigation Projects, Lessons Learned V

DESIGN FOR INTERNAL QUASI-STATIC PRESSURES FROM PARTIALLY CONFINED EXPLOSIONS

LOADED MULTICELLULAR MAGAZINE. Laurent ALLA IN

Surface Wave Processes on the Continental Shelf and Beach

WAVE LOAD ACTING ON HORIZONTAL PLATE DUE TO BORE

Shoreline Erosion and Proposed Control at Experimental Facility 15 Spesutie Island

CHAPTER 113 Impact Loading and Dynamic Response of Caisson Breakwaters

Distribution Restriction Statement

NON-THERMAL EFFECTS FROM HAZARD DIVISION 1.3 EVENTS INSIDE STRUCTURES

Ocean Mixing. James N. Moum

TEST RESULTS OF PHASE 2 LEVEL A SUITS TO CHALLENGE BY CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WARFARE AGENTS AND SIMULANTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: CIVIL ENGINEERING AND THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE Malta 5 th May 2011

DOMESTIC PREPAREDNESS: PROTECTION FACTOR TESTING OF THE SE-SHIELD SUIT WITH THE SE400 POWERED AIR PURIFYING RESPIRATOR (PAPR)

Evaluation of Microphone Windscreen Performance in a Wind Tunnel

The Modeling and Simulation of Underwater Acoustic Energy Exposure Due to Near Surface Explosions on Marine Mammals

The Great Coastal Gale of 2007 from Coastal Storms Program Buoy 46089

Transcription:

CETN-III-38 3/88 BRRAKING WAVE FORCES ON WALLS PURPOSE: To introduce the Goda method as an alternative to the Minikin method for the determination of breaking wave forces on semirigid wall structures. INTRODUCTION: Prediction of breaking wave forces on vertical walls is required for the design of wall structures in coastal waters. The Standard procedure followed by most harbor and coastal engineers in the US is the Minikin method documented in detail in the Shore Protection Manual (SPM, 1984). As the Minikin method is based on the shock pressure caused by breaking waves, the resulting forces and structure designs analyzed by using this procedure are generally considered to be conservative. The SPM cautions its users about the extremely high wave forces associated with the Minikin method..a less conservative method recommended by Goda (1974) is an alternative procedure for breaking wave force determination. The Technical Standards for Port and Harbour Facilities & Japan (1980) has adopted the Goda method but cautions that this method may underestimate the wave force. A factor of safety of 1.2 is recommended for structure design against sliding and overturning. The rationale of using the Goda method for design analysis is that the duration of the impulsive breaking force is relatively brief, on the order of tenth or hundredth of a second, and the effect of this force on the stability of massive concrete wall structures, particularly those with rubble mound bases, may be rather insignificant. In design practice, conditions that cause the occurrence of impulsive wave loading on structures should be avoided (Goda, 1985). For sensitive coastal structures, physical modeling may be required to ascertain the avoidance of impulsive breaking wave conditions. U. S. Army En&eer Waterway-s Experiment Station, Coastal En@wering Research Center P. 0. Box 631, Vicksburg, Mississippi 39160

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE MAR 1988 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Breaking Wave Forces On Walls 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED 00-00-1988 to 00-00-1988 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) U. S. Army En&eer Waterway-s Experiment Station,Coastal En@wering Research Center,P. 0. Box 631,Vicksburg,MS,39180 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT b. ABSTRACT c. THIS PAGE Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 4 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

Breaking Wave Pressures on a Vertical Wall GODA S FORMULAS: The above figure shows the structure configuration for which the Goda method is applied and illustrates the linear pressure distribution on the wall face due to wave impact. The key components of the pressure diagram are: P,=(a,+a,)*w.H, P+=(l-r/R)-!', where R=l.S*H,, a, - 0.6+ 0.5(4nD/f/sinh(4nD/L)) a,= 1 -d,/d( l- l/cosh(2tid/f)) w= H, = h= minja.bl = L= specific weight of water highest of the random waves breaking at a distance of 5Ib seaward of the wall; He is the significant wave height of the design sea state water depth at where Hb is determined smaller of a and b wavelength calculated by linear wave theory at the wall According to Goda (1985), the above equations are applicable to either breaking or nonbreaking wave conditions. 2

CETN-III-38 3/88 ~-- WAVE FORCE AND MOMENT: The integration of pressure distribution on the wall yields the force per unit length of the structure, F, where hc is the centroid of the pressure prism defined by PI and P4 above the mean water level. The overturning moment, M due to waves is.\i = F. hc where hc is the centroid of pressure prism above the wall base. APPLICATION PROCEDURE: The Goda method is developed for the design of caisson type breakwaters with rubble foundations. The following procedures are recommended for the design analysis. a. Select a design sea state and identify the significant wave height, Hs, and significant wave period, Ts. b. Determine h by h=d+s.m.h,, where m is the bottom slope. c. Calculate the breaking wave height, Hb, at h. Note that if I% is greater than the maximum wave height of the design sea state, there will be no breaking wave force exerted on the wall. In that case, use the maximum wave height for the wave force analysis or use methods described in the SPM (1984). The maximum wave height may be estimated as 1.8 times HI according to Godal 1985). d. Calculate wavelength L for depth D using the significant wave period of the design sea state and the linear wave theory or Tables C-l and G-2 of Appendix C of the SPM. e. Calculate the wave force and moment using Goda equations provided in this note. EXAMPLE: Given a vertical wall, 4.3 m (14 ft.) high sited in sea water with ds = 2.5 m (8.2 ft.). The wall is built on a bottom slope of 1:20 (m = 0.05). Reasonable wave periods range from 6 to 10 seconds. Find the maximum pressure, horizontal force, and overturning moment about the toe of the wall. Since there is no rubble mound base, the water depth D = ds = 2.5 m. For T = 10 seconds, find by using Figure 7-4 of the SPM, the design breaking wave height, Hb = 3.2 m. Without knowledge of significant wave height, Ha, the breaking depth, h, is determined directly by using Figure 7-2, which yields h = 3.07 m. The wave breaks at a distance of 11.4 m ( ~(3.07-2.5)/.05) from the w-all. Using Table C-l of Appendix C, SPM or computer program SIXW.A\-ES, w-ave length, L at D = 2.5 m is determined to be 48.7 m. Then, a,, a:, and a, are calculated to be 1.036, 0.101, and 0.950, respectively. Furthermore, R = 1.5 Hb = 4.8 m > 1.8 m The pressure components are calculated as (overtopping) 3

P. = u -u2;'w.h, =36.-4kN/m2 Pj =Clj.Pi = 34.6kN/m2 PI = P, - 3.0/4.8 = 22.8kN/mi The total horizontal force due to breaking wave is F =.5+, + P,j. 1.8+.5+,+ P&2.5 = 142 kn/m The overturning moment about the toe excluding moments due to uplift and hydrostatic forces is M= 289 kn-m/m Similar procedures are used to calculate the peak pressure, force and moment on the wall due to the 6 second wave. This example is the same as.example PROBLEM 34 of Page 7-182 of SPM. The comparison with results based on the Minikin method are summarized in the following table. Goda Method Minikin Method Wave Period (set) 6 10 6 10 Pl (kn/m 1 26.6 36.4 336 176 F (kn/m) 99.6 142 309 194 M (kn-m/m) 204 289 772 485 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: For additional information contact the CERC Coastal Design Branch, (601) 634-2067. REFERENCES: Goda, I-. 1974. New Wave Pressure Formulae for Composite Breakwater, Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Coastal Engineering, Copenhagen, Denmark. Goda, Y. 1385, Random Seas and Design of Maritime Structures, University of -- - Tokyo Press, Toyko, Japan. Shore Protection Manual, 4th ed., 1984. Coastal Engineering Research Center, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. Technical Standards for Port and Harbor Facilities a Japan. 1980. The --- Overseas Coastal Area Development Institute of Japan, Tokyo, Japan. 4