Tracy E. Skrabal. October 2, 2012

Similar documents
Estuarine Shoreline Stabilization

VIMS CCRM Coastal Management Decision Tools. Decision Tree for Undefended Shorelines and Those with Failed Structures

ALTERNATIVES FOR COASTAL STORM DAMAGE MITIGATION AND FUNCTIONAL DESIGN OF COASTAL STRUCTURES

ALTERNATIVES FOR COASTAL STORM DAMAGE MITIGATION

Public Notice U.S. Army Corps In Reply to Application Number CENAB-OP-RMS (NATIONAL HARBOR (FORMERLY PORT Baltimore District AMERICA])

RI Regulatory Setbacks & Buffers: Coastal Management Issues

Impact of Hurricane Matthew on the Atlantic Coast of Florida

GONE! Coastal Erosion Happens During Storms! Why Worry About Coastal Setbacks? Goals for Today

Protecting our Beaches

Blakely Island, N Thatcher Bay. Restoration Recommendation: Rank Score (total score)

July 14, The Beaches Conference Greg Berman (WHOI Sea Grant & Cape Cod Cooperative Extension)

JAP Additional Information Sheet

Atlantic Coast of Long Island, Jones Inlet to East Rockaway Inlet, Long Beach Island, NY Construction Update

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District

Coastal Hazards and Management in North Carolina. Braxton Davis April 14, 2015

NORTHERN CELL OPTIONS SHORTLIST RECOMMENDATIONS

Greg Berman (WHOI Sea Grant & Cape Cod Cooperative Extension) November 2, 2017

North Shore of Long Island, Feasibility Study

Living Shorelines Non-structural Erosion Control Practices Rhode Island Land & Water Summit, 2014

KEYNOTE PRESENTATION FSBPA olsen

For more information or permission to reprint slides, please contact Donna Milligan at 1

Response of a Newly Created Marsh-Wetland Affected by Tidal Forcing, Upland Discharge, and Groundwater Interaction

Design and Construction of Living

Design Considerations for Living Shorelines in Connecticut. Jennifer E.D. O Donnell Department of Marine Sciences University of Connecticut

Shoreline Studies Program, Department of Physical Sciences, VIMS

Overview. Beach Features. Coastal Regions. Other Beach Profile Features. CHAPTER 10 The Coast: Beaches and Shoreline Processes.

STATUS REPORT FOR THE SUBMERGED REEF BALL TM ARTIFICIAL REEF SUBMERGED BREAKWATER BEACH STABILIZATION PROJECT FOR THE GRAND CAYMAN MARRIOTT HOTEL

Shoreline Development

Part 9 Specific Land Uses - Foreshore & Waterway Development

ATLANTIC COUNTY 2006 to 2008

Building Coastal Resiliency at Plymouth Long Beach

RESILIENCE THROUGH RESTORATION

Figure79. Location map for the 10 NJBPN profile sites in Atlantic County, NJ 155

Beach Renourishment in Jacksonville

RE: Hurricane Matthew Beach Damage Assessment and Recommendations [CSE 2416]

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT

BALD HEAD ISLAND, NC SAND SHARING SYSTEM OVERVIEW AND ASSESSMENT. Erik J. Olsen, P.E. olsen associates, inc.

Broad Beach Sand & Dune Habitat Restoration Project. Revetment Owners Meeting July 12, 2017

Puget Sound Nearshore Ecosystem Restoration Project Restore America s Estuaries Conference 2012 Tampa, FL

OECS Regional Engineering Workshop September 29 October 3, 2014

Dune Monitoring Data Update Summary: 2013

Nearshore Sediment Transport What influences the loss of sediment on Beaches? - Waves - Winds - Tidal Currents - River discharge - Runoff

DUNE STABILIZATION AND BEACH EROSION

CHAPTER 4 - SHORELINE PROTECTION STUDY AND PLAN

Absecon Island Shore Protection The planning behind the project

Grays Harbor O&M and Deepening Dredging

Proposed Terrestrial Critical Habitat for the Northwest Atlantic Loggerhead Sea Turtle Population. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

4/20/17. #32 - Coastal Erosion Case Histories - Lake Michigan

New Jersey Beach Profile Network Atlantic County Profile Site Locations

Controlling Coastal erosion

AIRPORT RD. EROSION HOMEOWNER FOCUS GROUP SUMMARY 1/1/ PM NATURE COAST BIOLOGICAL STATION

Mouth of the Columbia River Jetties Three-Phase Construction Plan

23- Year Sand Volume Changes at Site 132, 15th Street, Brigantine

Energy Attenuation & Hybrid Living Shorelines: A Viable Tool for Coastal Resilience

Grays Harbor Federal Project

29 National Estuarine Research Reserves

REVETMENTS. Purposes and Operational Constraints. Purposes Erosion control o o. Revetment Design 4/5/2016. CE A676 Coastal Engineering

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY GALVESTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 1229 GALVESTON, TEXAS CESWG-CDR (1145)

Pend Oreille County Shoreline Master Program User Guide April Funded through a grant from the Washington State Department of Ecology

DELAWARE S VULNERABLE COASTAL AREAS. DELAWARE INLAND BAYS and DELAWARE BAY RECONNAISSANCE STUDY

National Shoreline Erosion Control Demonstration Program Overview

SPECIAL SPRING 2018 STORM REPORT ON THE CONDITION OF THE MUNICIPAL BEACHES FOR THE BOROUGH OF STONE HARBOR, CAPE MAY COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

Water Resources Report RKLD Annual Meeting July 30, 2016

Information for File # SEW

SHORE EROSION CONTROL GUIDELINES

CFH Boise City Parks and Recreation

The Sand Beaches of New Hampshire and Maine

US Beach Nourishment Experience:

Volume and Shoreline Changes along Pinellas County Beaches during Tropical Storm Debby

Anguilla. Wise practices for coping with. i b bea n Se a

INTRODUCTION TO COASTAL ENGINEERING

Chronic coastal erosion is a statewide problem

Figure 262. Location map for the 10 NJBPN profile sites in Atlantic County, NJ 279

Coastal management has lagged behind the growth in population leading to problems with pollution

Chapter 4 EM THE COASTAL ENGINEERING MANUAL (Part I) 1 August 2008 (Change 2) Table of Contents. Page. I-4-1. Background...

ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA

Ninilchik Harbor Page 2 of 11

Nevis. Wise practices for coping with

Fact Sheet Ordinance Regulating Erosion Threatened Structures

2018 Beach Preservation Project Information

NORTHAMPTON COUNTY WETLANDS BOARD Minutes May 15, 2013

LAB: WHERE S THE BEACH

TO: FROM: Y.102/MIN

CHAPTER 179. Performance of a Submerged Breakwater for Shore Protection

Introduction to Storm Surge

OECS Regional Engineering Workshop September 29 October 3, 2014

Essentials of Oceanography Eleventh Edition

Beach Restoration in Okaloosa and Walton Counties. FSBPA Technology Conference Clearwater, FL

New Jersey Coastal Zone Overview. The New Jersey Beach Profile Network (NJBPN) 3 Dimensional Assessments. Quantifying Shoreline Migration

UPPER BEACH REPLENISHMENT PROJECT RELATED

Living Shorelines. Created by: JoAnn Moody & Tina Miller-Way Discovery Hall Programs Dauphin Island Sea Lab

STRUCTURE S-65 PURPOSE SPILLWAY OPERATION

Trout Buffer Variance

ATLANTIC COAST OF LONG ISLAND, JONES INLET TO EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, LONG BEACH ISLAND, NY. Contract #2 Construction Scope. April 18th-19th 2018

JOINT PUBLIC NOTICE. October 5, 2015

Living Shorelines: Considerations for Advancing Coastal Resiliency

St Kitts. Wise practices for coping with

County of Santa Barbara Permit Option Analysis Goleta Beach JULY 13, 2017

Montserrat. Wise practices for coping with. i b bea n Se a

SACO RIVER AND CAMP ELLIS BEACH SACO, MAINE SECTION 111 SHORE DAMAGE MITIGATION PROJECT APPENDIX F ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT

Transcription:

Tracy E. Skrabal October 2, 2012

Jurisdiction Living Shorelines/Sills Timeline for Permit Bulkhead/Revetments North Atlantic Division New England Division suspended all nationwide permits March 20, 2012 using G.P. for entire district Maine G.P. miscellaneous Inland Water bank stabilization: Aquatic habitat restoration, establishment, and enhancement of wetlands and riparian areas and the restoration and enhancement of streams and other open waters with impacts of any area 15,000 SF, provided those activities result in net increase in overall aquatic resource functions and services. Navigable Water bank stabilization: Aquatic habitat restoration, establishment and enhancement provided those activities are proactive and result in net increases in aquatic resource functions and services Connecticut G.P. (19) properties. G.P. (20) Vertical walls/bulkheads shall only be used in situations where reflected wave energy can be tolerated. Inland Water bank stabilization: Category 1 (corps required): <500 long & <1 cy fill below OHW (only rough-faced stone or fiber roll revetments allowed) Category 2: (corps application required): 500 long or 1 cy fill below OHW line or slopes 1H:1V In stream work must take place between July 15 Oct 1 Navigable Water bank stabilization: Category 1: <200 long & <1 c.y. per linear foot along high tide line. Work must be conducted in the dry, during low water or between Nov. 8 Apr. 9); structure angles < 1H:1V and only rough-faced stone or fiber roll revetments allowed. G.P. (19) properties. For example, vertical bulkheads should only be used in Timeline for Permit Cat 1 2 week before Cat 1 2 week before

Rhode Island G.P. NAE-2011-2402 (authorized Feb. 22, 2012) Sequential minimization process: avoidance of aquatic resource impacts, diversion of overland flow, vegetative stabilization, stoned surfaces, walls/bulkheads. Massachusetts G.P. (20) properties using this sequential minimization process: avoidance of aquatic resource impacts, diversion of overland flow, vegetative stabilization, stone-sloped surfaces, and walls/bulkheads. Vertical walls/bulkheads shall only be used in situations where reflected wave energy can be tolerated. situations where reflected wave energy can be tolerated. A revetment is sloped and is typically employed to absorb the direct impact of waves more effectively than a vertical seawall, having a less adverse effect on the beach in front of it, abutting properties and wildlife. Stream bank stabilization: 200 length & 1 c.y. fill per linear foot below OHW line, work limited to June 1 Sep. 30 G.P. NAE-2011-2402 (authorized Feb. 22, 2012) Inland bank stabilization Category 1 (corps required): <100 long & <1 cy fill per linear foot below OHW, slopes must be 3H:1V Category 2 (corps application required): 100 long & 1 cy fill per linear foot below OHW In stream work limited to July 1 Oct 1 G.P. (20) properties using this sequential minimization process: avoidance of aquatic resource impacts, diversion of overland flow, vegetative stabilization, stone-sloped surfaces, and walls/bulkheads. Vertical walls/bulkheads shall only be used in situations where reflected wave energy can be tolerated. Inland bank stabilization: Category 1 (corps required): Cat 1 2 week before Cat 1 2 week before

New Hampshire P.G.P. (20) properties using least intrusive method to stabilize the bank (Env-Wt 404 Criteria for Shoreline Stabilization) and the following sequential minimization process: diversion of water, vegetative stabilization, stonesloped surfaces, and walls. Vertical bulkheads should only be used where reflected wave energy can be tolerated Vermont P.G.P (19) properties. Must use least intrusive method to stabilize the bank, following this sequential minimization process: avoidance, diversion of overland flow, vegetative stabilization, stone-sloped surfaces, and walls. Cat 1 Cat 2 30 day review period Cat 1 Cat 2 60 day review period 100 long & 1 cy fill below OHW, slopes must be 3H:1V No work must take place during time of year for spawning run/habitat of species present listed in Appendix B otherwise between Sept 1- June 30 Category 2 (corps application required): work not qualifying for category 1. P.G.P. (20) properties using least intrusive method to stabilize the bank (Env-Wt 404 Criteria for Shoreline Stabilization) and the following sequential minimization process: diversion of water, vegetative stabilization, stonesloped surfaces, and walls. Vertical bulkheads should only be used where reflected wave energy can be tolerated Inland bank stabilization: 100 long & 1 cy fill below OHW, slopes must be 3H:1V Work must take place between Jul 15- Oct 1 P.G.P. (19) properties. Must use least intrusive method to stabilize the bank, following this sequential minimization process: avoidance, diversion of overland flow, vegetative stabilization, stone-sloped surfaces, and walls. Cat 1 Cat 2 30 day review period Cat 1 Cat 2 60 day review period

Vertical walls/bulkheads must only be Vertical walls/bulkheads must only be used in situations where reflected used in situations where reflected wave wave energy can be tolerated. energy can be tolerated. Waters of the U.S. Category 1 (): <100 long & <1 cy fill below OHW; work must take place between Jul 15- Oct 1 Category 2 (application): 100 long or 1cy fill per linear foot below OHW Navigable Waters of the U.S. Category 1: nothing Category 2: < 500 long; average 1 c.y. per linear foot below OHW or less provided no wetland fill Individual Permit: 500 long or 1 c.y. per linear foot below OHW Baltimore District suspended all nationwide permits in lieu of State Program General Permit (SPGP), which Baltimore District developed in cooperation with both the State of Maryland (MDSPGP) and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (PASPGP) Maryland MDSPGP-4 (authorized Oct. 1, 2011) Will be reviewed in the order of preference: (1) nonstructural shoreline stabilization (beach nourishment, marsh creation, root wad or similar); (2) structural shoreline stabilization (revetments, breakwaters groins and bulkheads) Tidal marsh creation & beach nourishment (i.e. groins, stone sills in un-vegetated area to facilitate tidal marsh creation or beach nourishment; low profile sills not authorized with beach nourishment; breakwaters not authorized) Cat A Cat B(concurrent review with state) 30 day review period MDSPGP-4 (authorized Oct. 1, 2011) Will be reviewed in the order of preference: (1) nonstructural shoreline stabilization (beach nourishment, marsh creation, root wad or similar); (2) structural shoreline stabilization (revetments, breakwaters groins and bulkheads) New structures other than revetments and toe-protection for new or existing bulkheads (low profile stone sill, groin, breakwater, groins) Category A (does not require Corps review, may require Joint Permit Application): structure 500 linear feet along shoreline; total impacts to waters of the U.S. 5,000 Cat A Cat B (concurrent review with state) 30 day review period

Category A (does not require Corps review, may require Joint Permit Application): total impacts 17,500 sq. ft., may not extend more than 500 linear feet or 35 feet channelward of MWH; non-structural shorelines must be experiencing documented erosion Category B (requires Corps review and Joint Permit Application): total impacts 0.5 acre; may not extend more than 50 channelward of MHW sq.ft.; may not extend out more than 10 feet channelward of MHW, Category B (requires Corps review and Joint Permit Application): total impacts 0.5 acre and 2,000 linear feet along shoreline, may not extend more than 25 feet channelward of MHW shoreline Bulkhead repair or replacement Category A: may not extend 18 channelward of existing structure; discharges 1 c.y per running foot below MHW; no impacts to vegetated wetlands or SAV Category B: may not extend more than 3 channelward of existing structure; impacts to waters of the U.S. 10,000 sq.ft.; impacts to vegetated wetlands length of bulkhead repair in linear feet New bulkheads: Category A: 500 linear feet, must be placed at MHW, no impacts to special aquatic sites Category B: may not extend more than 3 feet channelward of MHW, total impacts to waters of the U.S. 0.5 acre and/or 2,000 linear feet of shoreline Non-tidal Bank Stabilization Category A: 500 linear feet, total impacts 10,000 sq. ft., 1 c.y. per linear foot of discharge below OHW, no discharge into wetlands or SAV

Philadelphia District Pennsylvania To maximum extent possible, bank stabilization should be accomplished using natural stabilization techniques (riparian plantings shall be included to the extent practicable) Delaware (cannot find working links to regional conditions) New Jersey NWP 13 regional condition: Bank stabilization efforts should be accomplished through non-structural measures such as vegetation or combinations of vegetation and rock. Any application that does not include such measures shall include an analysis demonstrating that such measures were not practicable and/or appropriate. Authorized March 16, 2012 Living shorelines projects authorized Cat I no Cat II Cat III 60 day review period 30 day review Category B: 2,000 linear feet, total impacts 0.5 acre, 1 c.y. per linear foot of discharge below OHW Suspended nationwide permits for activities authorized in PASPGP-4 (authorized July 1, 2011) Stream bank rehabilitation and protection Category I (requires no Corps ; must comply with PADEP): 500 linear feet and total impacts 1 acre Category II (requires via PA Bulletin): exceeds 500 linear feet OR total impacts 1 acre Category III (requires Corps approval): exceeds 500 linear feet and total impacts 1 acre (Joint permit application) NWP 13 no more than 500 length along bank, 1 c.y. per running foot along bank NWP 13 no more than 500 length along bank, 1 c.y. per running foot along bank Regional Condition G-5: All permanent structures, including piers and docks (piles, stringers, whalers and decking), utility poles, boat lifts, mooring piles, breakwaters, and replacement bulkheads must be constructed with non-polluting material SPGP 17 (authorizes construction in substantially developed artificial lagoons): Cat I no Cat II Cat III 60 day review period automatic PCN 60 days

Norfolk District Virginia under NWP 27; Reauthorized March 15, 2012; RP 19 includes sills and beach nourishment; sills may be made of sandbags, riprap, gabions, timber or concrete. Beach nourishment is authorized landward of sills for erosion purposes only (max of 1 acre). Submerged sills may not be connected to upland or constructed in conjunction with groin or other erosion control structures. Most living shoreline projects covered under NWP 27. Reauthorized March 15, 2012 South Atlantic Division Wilmington District North Carolina Individual Permit required for stone sill projects that qualify for NC s state General Permit. For stone sill projects that obtain NC s Major CAMA permit, COE authorizes with Programmatic Permit 291. Wooden sills (no fill) authorized by NC s GP and Programmatic GP. period 45 days 30 day review period 60-120 days 45-60 days Replacement or repair of existing bulkhead cannot extend more than 18 channelward of existing bulkhead. Structures authorized cannot extend more than 20% of the width of the lagoon from MLWL. Joint application applies to all bank stabilization Bulkheads will be denied unless no viable alternative exists. NWP 13 no more than 500 length along bank, 1 c.y. per running foot along bank RP 19 Groins, jetties, spurs associated and beach nourishment landward of groin for erosion control only (max of 1 acre); bulkheads, riprap revetments must be necessary for existing erosion problem, filling of vegetated wetlands may not exceed length of shoreline activity, repair of bulkheads up to 2 channelward of existing bulkhead NWP 13 no more than 500 length along bank, 1 c.y. per running foot along bank GP 197800080 to maintain, repair, construct and backfill bulkheads and riprap along eroding high-ground shorelines & to construct riprap to protect eroding wetland shorelines Structures must be 500 linear ft along shoreline; bulkhead placement must not exceed 2 average and 5 max waterward if 45 days 60 days

Charleston District South Carolina Savannah District Georgia Mobile District Alabama Most living shoreline projects covered under NWP 27; includes PC which allows agencies 15 days to comment within the 45 day permit period. NWP 27 discharge cannot cause loss greater than 300 linear feet of streambed. Can also use NWP 13 for sill projects if qualifying. NWP 13 for 95% of all permits for living shoreline or other projects; **** have programmatic 401 certification for any project that gains approval by state (USCOE defers to state of GA on 98% of all shoreline stabilization projects) Most living shoreline projects covered under NWP 27; Reauthorized March 15, 2012 ALG09-2011 (Joint Application Required) Newly approved and adopted for estuarine nourishment and living shoreline projects; allows fill for sandy beaches or marsh sills, breakwaters, etc. with marsh restoration. Includes requirement for legal document that voluntarily removes fee simple ownership of 45 days review 60 day PCN 45 day PCN 45-60 day MHWM and OHWM; riprap must not exceed 10 waterward of MHWM and OHWM NWP 13 no more than 500 length along bank, 1 c.y. per running foot along bank NWP 13 no more than 500 length along bank, 1 c.y. per running foot along bank RP0057 Riprap, bulkheads: 1c.y. per linear foot in addition to that authorized in NWP 13 RP0061 Jetties/Breakwaters: less than 1000c.y. non-erosive material during low water; 500c.y. during normal pool conditions. NWP 13 not authorized in AL previously used for all shoreline stabilization projects; State of Alabama (ADEM) recently denied Coastal Zone consistency for NWP for bulkheads/riprap; thereby requiring all bulkhead projects to need to go to AL/COE for permits for all projects ALG11-2011 (Joint application with State of automatic 60 day PCN disallowed 45-60 days

Jacksonville District Florida reclaimed shoreline, thus addressing concerns over upland property reclamation. ALG10-2011 (Joint Application required) authorizes restoration of dunes, beaches, wetlands, submerged grassbeds. Reef and/or breakwater construction allowed in conjunction with living shorelines to encourage shoreline enhancement. Recently re-authorized NWP 27 now used to cover most living shoreline projects, where goal is restoration/ preservation of estuarine resources. Reauthorized March 15, 2012 Regional conditions require joint authorization. Alabama Required) Armoring systems authorizes riprap, bulkheads, river training structures, bioengineering, and other shoreline protection methods. Contains regional conditions which require applicant to demonstrate why use of alternatives (to bulkheads/riprap) is not feasible. Riprap 1 c.y. per linear foot Bulkheads 1000 total length, cannot extend 24 waterward from base of failed structure Permit does not authorize wing walls, groins, jetties, or any solid structure perpendicular to shore Notice went out Sept. 30, 2011 30 day PCN Note: Jacksonville District defines residential canals as manmade waterways and therefore permits for structures within these canals are excluded. NWP 13 (Joint application required) no more than 500 length along bank, 1 c.y. per running foot along bank below OHWM Regional conditions: not used in Florida Keys; no structures within 100 setback; SAJ-77: authorizes minor structures within Okeechobee waterway revetments 500 long and 1 c.y. fill per linear foot

SAJ -91: riprap revetments in Cape Coral, Lee County, FL (residential canals excluded). no more than 500 length along bank, 1 c.y. per running foot along bank below OHWM SAJ-96: minor structures within Pinellas County) authorizes construction and repair of bulkheads and backfill and riprap revetments. New vertical seawalls cannot be placed waterward of MHWL or OHWL unless to align with adjacent seawall; cannot exceed 100 long. Seawalls and riprap restoration permitted within 1 foot waterward of previous location. New riprap cannot be more than 10 waterward of MHWL or OHWL. Slopes for stabilization methods other than seawalls can be no steeper than 2H:1V. Mississippi Valley Division Vicksburg District Mississippi NWP 27 (re-authorized March 1, 2012) covers most living shoreline projects, 45 day review NWP 13 - FL SPGP IV-R1 (does not include Florida Panhandle) Shoreline stabilization (riprap, seawalls, and others NOT to include groins, jetties, breakwaters, beach nourishment): only to prevent erosion or stabilize eroded area; cannot be waterward of MHWL or OHWL; restoration of seawall or riprap 1 waterward of previous location; new riprap 10 waterward MHWL or OHWL; slopes 2H:1V

where goal is restoration/ preservation of estuarine resources. MSGP-03 (Joint Application Required) Authorizes preservation and restoration of dunes, beaches, wetlands, submerged aquatic vegetation, protection and propagation of essential fish habitat, shoreline restoration and nourishment. Living shorelines may extend from existing shoreline at MHW and extend waterward by no more than 10. Riprap materials, previous interlocking brick systems, filter mats, and similar should be used in lieu of vertical seawalls and bulkheads. Notice went out Jan 25, 2011 MSGP-01 (Joint Application Required) Authorizes bulkheads, armoring systems (riprap), bioengineering and other methods paralleling the shoreline. Structures must be along existing shoreline at MHTL or OHWL or landward of all jurisdictional wetlands. Bulkheads total length 1000 for residential and 1500 for commercial properties; Riprap 1c.y. per linear foot of shoreline, cannot extend farther than 36 into waterway from MHTL or OHWL Solid groins or jetties are not authorized Louisiana RGP 70: bioengineered bank stabilization Bank should be contoured to 2:1 slope, may be steeper in narrow transitional zone, plant stream bank with native vegetation only (no length or area restrictions) Effective until 6/24/2013 NWP 27 invalid unless Louisiana Department of Natural Resources determination/ certification is obtained 30 day PCN LA PGP generally supersedes NWP 13 Category 1: bank stabilization not to exceed 200 long and greater than 1 c.y. per linear foot of fill. Category 2: bank stabilization >200 but 500 linear feet; or fill placement > 1 c.y. linear foot. NWP 13 invalid unless Louisiana Department of Natural Resources determination/ certification is obtained Cat 1: 45 day review Cat 2: 45 day review