PenPlace SPRC #6. September 27, DRAFT

Similar documents
FY Transportation Capital Improvement Plan Update Arlington Committee for Transportation Choices

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. Introduction. Neighborhood Traffic Analysis. Vehicular Travel Times. Mitch Bonanno. Vornado/Charles E. Smith.

Business owner or commercial property owner in Arlington, 8. Visitor in Arlington, 17

Development of Arlington County s Marked Crosswalk Guidelines. Jon Lawler, P.E. Design Engineer Arlington County, VA

Arlington Public Schools Thomas Jefferson Site Evaluation Transportation Networks. Thomas Jefferson Working Group Meeting #6 November 10, 2014

Crystal City-Potomac Yard Transitway Extension

Transportation. Pages E-3 to E-145 PROPOSED FY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) CCCRC Presentation Thursday, June 14, 2018

Metropolitan Park 4/5

Transportation, Parking & Roads

Institute for Real Estate Management Chapter (IREM) 77 VDOT Northern Virginia Megaprojects September 13, 2017

Crystal City Citizen Review Council Meeting. July 10, 2013

TRANSIT PERFORMANCE IN THE I-66 INSIDE THE BELTWAY CORRIDOR

Virginia Hospital Center Expansion

Integrating Community Development and Transportation Strategies. November 13, 2014

CRYSTAL HOUSE III TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ARLINGTON COUNTY, VA

Arlington Public Schools Thomas Jefferson Site Evaluation Preliminary Findings. Thomas Jefferson Working Group Meeting #2 October 1, 2014

RIVERSIDE, Newton MA BH NORMANDY RIVERSIDE LLC. Riverside Station. A green, transit-oriented community

R o s s l y n, A r l i n g t o n C o u n t y, V i r g i n i a. S i t e P l a n R e v i e w C o m m i t t e e M e e t i n g # 5

I-395 Express Lanes Northern Extension Project Arlington County Board October 18, 2016

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. Introduction

Multimodal Through Corridors and Placemaking Corridors

FY 2018 I-66 Commuter Choice Program Presentation to the Northern Virginia Transportation Commission May 3,

Dulles Area Transportation Association. October 11, Susan Shaw, P.E., Megaprojects Director Virginia Department of Transportation

Appendix C. NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station

Ballston Station Multimodal Study WMATA and Arlington County. Meeting Minutes

Arlington County 10-Year Transit Development Plan & Premium Transit Network Briefing. May 2016

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

DOT Performance Measurement and Reporting System All Performance Measures

Paul VI Redevelopment. Traffic Impact Study

BRIEFING ON PROPOSED ADDITIONS AND CHANGES Additions and Changes to Projects Proposed for Inclusion in the 2015 CLRP Update

Arlington Public Schools Abingdon Elementary School Site Evaluation Preliminary Transportation Findings

Appendix F: Detailed Modeling Results

C C C

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA

Route 7 Corridor Study

Arlington County, Virginia ~ National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (TPB) Transportation and Land-Use Connections (TLC) Program

DULLES AREA TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION (DATA) February 18, Susan Shaw, P.E., VDOT, Megaprojects Director

CHAPTER 7 OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION Mobility for all Modes

Plant City Walk-Bike Plan

Transportation Management Program Office Newsletter N O V E M B E R

Washington DC Section of ITE Project Briefing

Transportation Management Program Office Newsletter J U L Y

Meeting Schedule 7:00-7:15 Open House 7:15-7:45 Existing Conditions/Short-Term Improvements Study Presentation 7:45-8:00 Q&A Session 8:00-8:10

El Camino Real Specific Plan. TAC/CAC Meeting #2 Aug 1, 2018

VIVA RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES OAKVILLE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Planned Improvements from Sector & Area Plans that have been added to the MTP

Martha Coello, Fairfax County DOT Jeffrey Hermann, Fairfax County DOT Abi Lerner, VDOT. May 19, 2014

MCA Member Meeting: Tysons Update. Fairfax County Department of Transportation November 13, 2017

Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) November 21, 2013

1609 E. FRANKLIN STREET HOTEL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

SECTION 1 - TRAFFIC PLANNING

El Centro Mobility Hub

Table #6 VISION CHARACTERISTICS

I-395 Express Lanes Northern Extension Project Crystal City Civic Association September 21, 2016

92% COMMUTING IN THE METRO. Congested Roadways Mode Share. Roadway Congestion & Mode Share

Columbia Pike Implementation Team (CPIT) Meeting

Long Island Rail Road Expansion Project Floral Park to Hicksville

SPRINGFIELD REVITALIZATION REPORT

Appendix P (Version 2) Bikeway Projects in Currently Approved Plans. Planned Improvements from Sector & Area Plans that have been added to the MTP

List of Exhibits...ii

NAUCK SHIRLINGTON ALEXANDRIA FIGURE 2.22: CIRCULATION MAP 2.24

M Street SW-Southeast Federal Center

University of Victoria Campus Cycling Plan Terms of Reference. 1.0 Project Description

INNER LOOP EAST. AIA Rochester Annual Meeting November 13, 2013 TRANSFORMATION PROJECT. Bret Garwood, NBD Erik Frisch, DES

Los Altos Hills Town Council - June 18, 2015 Palo Alto City Council June 22, AGENDA ITEM #2.B Presentation

Performance Criteria for 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan

Town of Bethlehem. Planning Assessment. Bethlehem Town Board

What Is a Complete Street?

BID Strategy Group and Stakeholders Meeting. April 17, 2018

Goodlettsville Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Executive Summary

City of Charlottesville Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update

Arlington Public Schools New Elementary School at Thomas Jefferson Site Off-Site Transportation. Thomas Jefferson BLPC / PFRC Meeting July 27, 2016

September The State of Bicycling in Montgomery County

MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS FIRST DRAFT NEW ES AT REED SITE WASHINGTON, DC. May 8, 2018 (DRAFT)

5/31/2016 VIA . Arwen Wacht City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Blvd., 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

The DC Pedestrian Master Plan

June 15, Ms. Norma Cozart Zoning Administrator ARLINGTON COUNTY 2100 Clarendon Boulevard Arlington, VA RE: Special GLUP Study Request

STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING June 17, Streetscape Overview Burlington Comprehensive Master Plan

City of Hyattsville. Citywide Traffic Study and Transportation Plan. Sabra, Wang & Associates. February, 2010

ELEMENT 11 TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT

MEMORANDUM INTRODUCTION DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT. District of Columbia Zoning Commission. Jami L. Milanovich, P.E.

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 1660 COMSTOCK ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for:

Public Information and Participation Comments

VAN AKEN DISTRICT CONNECTIONS PLAN COMMUNITY MEETING #1 June 20, 2016 SMITHGROUP JJR WSP PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF STUDIO GRAPHIQUE

Land Use and Transportation Town Hall September 17, 2018

Appendix B. Environmental Resource Technical Memorandum. Assessment on Travel Pattern and Access Impacts

Michael A. Werthmann, PE, PTOE Principal

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

Shockoe Bottom Preliminary Traffic and Parking Analysis

Magnolia Place. Traffic Impact Analysis. Prepared for: City of San Mateo. Prepared by: Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Road Diets FDOT Process

OFFICE/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT 1625 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Canada Inc.

INTERSTATE 395 EXPRESS LANES NORTHERN EXTENSION ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS TECHNICAL REPORT SEPTEMBER 2016

Ownership Lots 17 & 18 (Part of Lot 14), Montgomery Auto Sales Park

I-395 Express Lanes Northern Extension Project Public Hearings

Existing Transportation System

Existing Transportation System

7/23/2017 VIA . Michael Hanebutt City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Boulevard, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

MASONIC AVENUE STREET DESIGN STUDY Community Workshop 2. Masonic Ave Street Design Study Community Workshop 2 August 10, 2010

Preliminary Transportation Analysis

Transcription:

PenPlace SPRC #6 1

Agenda Site and Project Overview Multiple Transportation Options Traffic Analysis Neighborhood Analysis Street Network Street Sections/Sidewalk Width Pedestrian/Bicycle Circulation Secure Roads Parking and Loading Entrances Transportation Demand Management (TDM) 2

Site and Project Overview PenPlace PenPlace South of Army Navy Drive East of S. Fern Street West of S. Eads Street North of future 12 th Street S. extension 3

Site and Project Overview Site Program Office - 1,800,000 SF Hotel - 300 Rooms Retail 25,000 SF Program Analyzed Office - 1,800,000 SF Hotel - 300 Rooms Retail 50,000 SF 4

Infrastructure/Multiple Transportation Options 5

Multiple Transportation Options Metro/VRE Walking Routes To/From Transit Metro and VRE within short Walking Distance to PenPlace Pentagon Metro 8 to 9 minutes Pentagon City Metro 3 minutes Crystal City Metro 11 minutes Pentagon City Mall 5 minutes VRE 13 minutes Walking Paths Distributed on Adjacent Roads Pedestrians Primarily Approach via the 12 th Street Corridor 6

Multiple Transportation Options - Streetcar Future Street Car Stops Significant Opportunity for both Commuting and Off Peak Street Car Trips Streetcar Stop Directly Adjacent to the PenPlace Site, serving two routes: Columbia Pike Streetcar Crystal City/Potomac Yards Streetcar Line 7

Multiple Transportation Options Bus Routes Bus Routes Significant Opportunity for Multi-Modal Bus Related Travel Approximately 30 Bus Routes Within Proximity of PenPlace, including: WMATA (Approximately 21 Routes) ART (Approximately 4 Routes) Fairfax Connector (Approximately 2 Routes) Loudon County Transit Bus Transfer Center located at the Pentagon Metro Station 8

Multiple Transportation Options Bike Facilities Bike Facilities Comprehensive Bike Network serving Pentagon City Opportunities for both Commuting and Off Peak Bike Travel Ample Bikeshare Locations both on and off site Pentagon City 5 Existing Stations 1 Proposed Station at Pen Place Crystal City 6 Existing Stations Over 100 Docks in the Area 9

Existing Roadway Access Primary Approach Routes Multiple Opportunities for Access from Regional Roadways I-395 I-395 HOV Lanes Route 110 Route 27 (Washington Blvd) Route 1 Well Established Local Grid of Streets Columbia Pike 15 th Street Army Navy Drive S. Eads Street 10

Traffic Analysis 11

Traffic Analysis Traffic Impact Analysis A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was completed for the PenPlace site The TIA was scoped with VDOT and Arlington County The analysis was completed according to VDOT Chapter 527 guidelines VDOT reviewed and approved the study 12

Site Transportation Characteristics PenPlace Development Mode Splits Significant Opportunity for Multi Modal Travel Significant Multi Modal Infrastructure available to serve Multi Modal Trips 100% 80% 60% DA Transit Bike/walk Carpool/vanpool 79% Crystal City Mode Splits* Transit 44% Carpool/Vanpool 9% Bike/Walk 4% Drive Alone (DA) - 41% 47% 48% 44% 40% 34% 40% 41% 20% 0% 10% 9% 8% 9% 11% 3% 4% 1% Ballston/Courthouse Rosslyn Crystal City Other 4% *Based on the Arlington County Commercial Building Topline Research Report (July 2009) by LDA Consulting and Southeastern Institute of Research 13

Intersections Studied Intersections Studied Determined based on scoping meeting with Arlington County and VDOT Army Navy Drive 12 th Street 15 th Street S. Hayes Street S. Fern Street S. Eads Street Route 1 ramps 14

Existing Intersection Operations Existing Operations Intersections Operate at Acceptable Standards All signalized intersections have overall LOS D or better All Intersections have mainline non-turning movements at LOS D or better Unsignalized 12 th and Army Navy SB approach unacceptable LOS in both peak hours and experiences some delay 15

Future Intersection Operations Future Operations Intersections Continue to Operate at Acceptable Levels All signalized intersections have overall LOS D or better All Intersections have mainline non-turning movements at LOS D or better Overall Intersection Operations consistent or improved from Background Conditions 16

Peak Hour Site Traffic Change Average (AM/PM) Peak Hour Site Traffic Change Trip Distribution Discussed with County and VDOT during scoping process Based on: Existing Traffic Patterns Census Data Other Area Studies Site Trips Distributed overall multiple Routes Minimal Increases in Total Traffic on Adjacent Roads 0.91% - 4.70% 96 Trips Site Roadway Trips (2.14%) % Increase in Road Volume 17

Trip Distribution and Approach Routes Trip Distribution and Approach Routes Approach Routes Well Distributed on Adjacent Road Network Access Opportunities from all sides of Development I-395, I-395 (HOV), VA 244 (Columbia Pike), VA 27 (Washington Boulevard), VA 110 all approach the site from the north Route 1 and localized traffic approach site from the south 18

Neighborhood Analysis 19

Additional Study Review of Regional vs. Neighborhood-Oriented or Local Routes Regional Routes show Travel Time Advantage Average Travel Times: From Route 1 and S. Glebe: Route E 7 Minute Route C 7.5 Minute Route A 8 Minute Route I 10 Minute Inbound 20 From I-395 and S. Glebe: Route J 4 Minute Route K 8.5 Minute Route L 10 Minute

Additional Study Review of Regional vs. Neighborhood-Oriented or Local Routes Regional Routes show Travel Time Advantage Average Travel Times To Route 1 and S. Glebe: Route E 5.5 Minute Route A 10 Minute Route I 14 Minute To I-395 and S. Glebe: Route J 6 Minute Route M 7.5 Minute Route K 9 Minute Outbound 21

Street Network 22

Street Network Two Secure Buildings One Secure Building 23

Street Network Fern Street Intersection Acceptable Level of Service (LOS) no Impacts with Queued vehicles Restrict Lefts Exiting Site Circulate to/from site with other grid streets Minimize potential for any operational issues Adequate LOS and No Impacts with Queued vehicles Inbound/Outbound Circulation Access and Queuing 24

Street Network Internal Elm Street Intersection No Lock Up Lefts Adequate Separation Less Total Conflict Points 18 vs. 32 with traditional 4-way intersection Raised Crosswalks on Elm (North and South Side of Intersection) Left Turns Do Not Overlap Raised Crosswalks Source: Federal Highway Administration. (2004). Signalized Intersections: Informational Guide. (FHWA Report No. FHWA-HRT-04-091). (http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/04091/index.cfm) Intersection Separation Reduced Conflict Points 25

Street Sections/Sidewalk Width 26

Street Sections - Overview Two Secure Buildings One Secure Building 27

Street Sections Army Navy Drive (A) -- PROPOSED BUILDING r I I I I \ EXISTING TRAVEL LANES AND MEDIAN EXISTING SIDEWALK (5'-0" +/-) EXISTING PARKING LOT 20'-0" 68'-0" 28

Street Sections S. Eads Street (B1.1) OHE SECIJJIE IUILOING PROPOSED BUILDING r I EXISTING SIDEWALK I EXISTING TRAVEL LANES -..._---TREE PLANTING/ STREET FURNITURE ZONE 45'-0" 25'-0" J l r t 1 l 29

Street Sections S. Eads Street (B1.2) -- r I I I I \ PROPOSED BUILDING EXISTING SIDEWALK I EXISTING TRAVEL LANES LANDSCAPE WITH TURF, TREES AND SHRUBS - HARDSCAPE AT BUILDING ENTRANCES '----L LEAR PATH 45' PLANTING/ STREET FURNITURE ZONE 7f----------------------------------~~--------~ ~--~~~RK.INGLANE 82'-0"SECURE OPEN SPACE 30

Street Sections S. Eads Street (B2) -- ct PROPOSED BUILDING r I I I I \ I EXISTING SIDEWALK I EXISTING TRAVEL LANES "1------r LEAR PATH "+---TREE PLANTING/ STREET FURNITURE ZONE 48'-0" 15'-0" I {~ 31

Street Sections S. Fern Street (C1) c~ -- PROPOSED BUILDING r I I I I \ EXISTING SIDEWALK EXISnNG TRAVEL LANES LANDSCAPE WITH TURF, TREES AND SHRUBS - HARDSCAPE AT BUILDING ENTRANCES 42'-0' 15'-0" TREE PLANTING/STREET FURNITURE ZONE 82'-0' SECURE OPEN SPACE 32

Street Sections S. Fern Street (C2) -- EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING r I I I I \ EXISTING SIDEWALK I EXISTING TRAVEL LANES ZONE 42'-0" 22'-0" 33

Street Sections Internal Street (D1.1) OHE UCIJJIE IUILOING PROPOSED BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING r I 7'-0" 5'-0" 7'-0" 22'-0" 7'-0" 5'-0" TRAVEL LANES 1 0'-0" "-t----{...ltfi,k PATH TREE PLANTING/AMENITY ZONt-----" PARKING 12'-0" 36'-0" '--+--TREE PLANTING/ AMENITY ZONE '-+--1-'ARKING LANE 34

Street Sections Internal Street (D1.2) PROPOSED BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING r I I I I \ LANDSCAPE WITH TURF, TREES AND SHRUBS - HARDSCAPE AT BUILDING ENTRANCES '---1-------c:tEJ~ PATH TREE PLANTING/AMENITY 701NF------"'1 PARKING 30'-0" 15'-0' ~f---tirf F PLANTING/STREET FURNITURE ZONE 82'-0' SECURE OPEN SPACE 35

Street Sections Internal Street (D2) -- PROPOSED BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING r I I I I \ LANDSCAPE WITH TURF, TREES AND SHRUBS - HARDSCAPE AT BUILDING ENTRANCES...,f--cl EJliR PATH TREE PLANTING/AMENITY?ONF----1 PARKING 30'-0" 15'-0'..._1--TRFF PLANTING/STREET FURNITURE ZONE 82'-0' SECURE OPEN SPACE 36

Street Sections S. Elm Street (E1.2) -- E1.,2... r I 1\ I I I I I \ PROPOSED BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING 15'-0' 30'-0' 15'-0' '--1--- T>>> PlANTING/STREET FURNITURE ZONE ~--!';IRKING lane 82'-0' SECURE OPEN SPACE 82'-0' SECURE OPEN SPACE 37

Street Sections S. Elm Street (E1.1) OHE SECIJJIE IUILOING r I PRUPU!>ED BUilDING PROPOSED BUilDING -r---<..l.ti\j< PATH "'---To«PlANTING/ STREET FURNITURE ZONE 120'-0' 15'-0' 30'-0' 15'-0' 82'-0' SECURE OPEN SPACE 38

Street Sections - 12 th Street S. (F) -- PROPOSED MET PARK BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING r I 20'-0"- 22'-0" 8'-0" 12'-0" EXISTING TRAVEL PARKING LANE LANE 32'-0" I I RAISED TROLLEY LANE TRAVEL LANE AMENITY ZONE PATH 72-0" 22'-0" 39

Pedestrian/Bicycle Circulation 40

Pedestrian Circulation One Secure Building Two Secure Buildings Note: Buildings not fully designed and entrances may shift along the designated frontage 41

Bike Facilities Planned Cycletrack Along Army Navy Drive Plans for a Cycletrack to be provided along Army Navy Drive to 12 th Street New Capital Bikeshare station proposed to be located in Pedestrian Plaza on PenPlace site Bike racks and storage will be provided, location is to be determined upon final building design 42

Secure Roads 43

Security Gate Analysis Booth 1 Booth 1 Booth 2 Note: Final booth location to be determined with final building design Queuing Analysis Analyzed for a range of processing times (from 5-20 seconds/vehicle) 2 inbound lanes recommended at each access 44

Security Gate Analysis - Alternate Booth 1 Booth 1 Booth 2 Note: Final booth location to be determined with final building design 45

Parking and Loading Entrances 46

On Street Parking TWO SECURE BUILDINGS SCHEME ONE SECURE BUILDINGS SCHEME Note: Potential area for on street parking is subject to final design 47

Parking and Loading ZONE FOR FUTURE LOCATION OF PARKING AND LOADING ENTRY/EXIT ZONE FOR FUTURE LOCATION OF PARKING AND LOADING ENTRY/EXIT LOCATION TWO SECURE BUILDINGS SCHEME LOCATION ONE SECURE BUILDING SCHEME Note: Final location to be determined with final building design 48

Transportation Demand Management (TDM) 49

TDM Immediate proximity to Metrorail, Metrobus, VRE, commuter buses, Capital Bikeshare, ZipCar carsharing and the future Crystal City and Columbia Pike Transitways On-Site TDM Coordinator Arlington County Commuter Services (ACCS) contribution Preloaded SmarTrip Cards Internal bicycle storage, lockers, and shower facilities External bicycle parking facilities Designated vanpool and carpool spaces 50

Questions/Comments? Questions/Comments? 51