VME Encounter Protocols (VME indicators, thresholds and move-on-rules)

Similar documents
The Protection of Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems in the Northwest Atlantic: NAFO Processes and Regulations

The EU experience in implementation

Bottom Fishery Impact Assessment Standard

Edible Trawl. Yes, you can eat this experiment!

SC WG ON THE ECOSYSTEM APPROACH TO FISHERIES MANAGEMENT MAY 2008

NAFO s Experience in addressing the impact of bottom fisheries on

SC6-DW09. Methods for deriving thresholds for VME encounter protocols for SPRFMO bottom fisheries

Essential Fish Habitat. Conservation and Management

REF: COMM/UN/2015/ DATE: 20 January 2015

High seas: conservation and management measures to prevent significant adverse impacts on vulnerable marine ecosystems

CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT MEASURE FOR BOTTOM FISHERIES AND PROTECTION OF VULNERABLE MARINE ECOSYSTEMS IN THE NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC OCEAN

Recommendations for the meeting of the North-East Atlantic Fisheries Commission 9-13 November 2009

CMM on the Management of Bottom Fishing in the SPRFMO Convention Area

CMM Conservation and Management Measure for the Management of Bottom Fishing in the SPRFMO Convention Area

CMM on Management of New and Exploratory Fisheries in the SPRFMO Convention Area

CCAMLR NOTIFICATIONS OF NEW ZEALAND S INTENTION TO CONDUCT EXPLORATORY LONGLINE FISHERIES FOR DISSOSTICHUS SPP. IN THE 2008/09 SEASON

Introductory List to Local Marine Animals

Review of the implementation of the provisions of UN GA resolution 61/105 related to the management of high seas bottom fisheries

7 th Annual Meeting of the Commission January, The Hague, The Netherlands

ERLING SVENSEN/ WWF-CANON. [Type text] Vigo, Spain, September 2014

7TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE COMMISSION

CMM Conservation and Management Measure for the Management of New and Exploratory Fisheries in the SPRFMO Convention Area.

FAO REGIONAL WORKSHOP ON VULNERABLE MARINE ECOSYSTEMS (VMES) IN THE NORTH PACIFIC OCEAN

INTERIM MEASURES ADOPTED BY PARTICIPANTS IN NEGOTIATIONS TO ESTABLISH SOUTH PACIFIC REGIONAL FISHERIES MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION

Odd Aksel Bergstad Institute of Marine Research Norway

7 th Annual Meeting of the Commission January, The Hague, The Netherlands

Protecting Deep Sea Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems Under the United Nations General Assembly Resolutions and SPRFMO Convention

The economic implications of changing regulations for deep sea fishing: UK case study

Protecting the Deep Sea Under International Law. Legal Options for Addressing High Seas Bottom Trawling

Update on MPAs beyond National Jurisdiction

Bycatch accounting and management in the Ross Sea toothfish fishery

6 th Meeting of the Scientific Committee Puerto Varas, Chile, 9-14 September SC6-Doc14 New Zealand s Annual Report

11th Meeting of the Science Working Group. Lima, Peru, October SWG-11-12a. New Zealand SPRFMO Observer Implementation Report for 2011

NEAFC request to evaluate the use and quality of VMS data

SC WG ON THE ECOSYSTEM APPROACH TO FISHERIES MANAGEMENT DECEMBER 2011

Specimen Collection and Classification Activity

7 th Annual Meeting of the Commission January, The Hague, The Netherlands

Fisheries management in the Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction

Edible, and. Coral Reefs! Photo: CEDixon

MPA proposals West of Scotland

Chapter 5 Marine Protozoans and Invertebrates

Monterey Bay Aquarium Fieldtrip Worksheet

CCAMLR s ecosystem approach to managing Antarctic fisheries

Prof.Dr.Hanan M Mitwally, Marine Biology. Objectives

HABITAT AREAS OF PARTICULAR CONCERN (HAPC) PROPOSAL

/ Advice May 2011

Advance reporting material (English only)

A. Porifera (sponges): B. Cnidaria (jellies, hydra, sea anemones, and corals):

2nd Meeting of the Small Scientific Committee on Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems REPORT

SUMMARY OF PRIORITY RECOMMENDATIONS

Delegation of Australia

Fishery Report 2016: Exploratory fishery for Dissostichus spp. in Division

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. Accompanying document to the

New information regarding the impact of fisheries on other components of the ecosystem

LIFE BaĦAR for N2K Project Survey Findings. Leyla Knittweis on behalf of the LIFE BaĦAR for N2K Project

Fishery Report 2016: Dissostichus eleginoides Crozet Island French EEZ (Subarea 58.6)

II. Important progress made by relevant States to sustainably manage deep sea fish stocks and protect vulnerable marine ecosystems in the NPO

D Executive SUMMARY: The Implementation of UN Resolutions 61/105 and 64/72 in the Management of Deep-Sea Fisheries on the High Seas

Ecosystem-based Science for Management of Alaskan Fisheries. Patricia A. Livingston NOAA-Fisheries Alaska Fisheries Science Center Seattle, WA, USA

EXPERT CONSULTATION ON DEEP-SEA FISHERIES IN THE HIGH SEAS

Animal Diversity. Kingdom Animalia

Deep-sea coral protection zones and management measures

Ocean Environmental Science Art Workshop

Record of the workshop of regional deep sea fisheries management bodies in support of the Worldwide Review of Bottom Fisheries in the High Seas

Predicting the distribution of coldwater corals & protections to date

Commercial Fisheries in the South Coast s Marine Protected Areas

Aquarium entrance stamp here

PHYLUM: PLATHYHELMINTHES

Certification and defining the Unit of Assessment

would permit fishing throughout the entire 550 square miles to one that would maintain the status quo.

A8-0377/

An Camus, Lochboisdale, South Uist

EXTRACREDIT PROJECT ANIMALS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA S OCEAN

Summary of Research within Lamlash Bay No-Take Zone - Science report for COAST July

CCAMLR. Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources

Evolution of Deepwater Coral Protection in the Southeast U.S

BIO 164 MARINE BIOLOGY, SPRING 2018

2017 NEAFC Annual Meeting (November 13th 17th)

Strait of Georgia and Howe Sound Glass Sponge Reef Conservation Initiative

Fishery Report 2017: Dissostichus spp. (Subarea 48.2)

COUNTRY NOTE ON NATIONAL FISHERIES MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS -- SPAIN

The Stock Assessment Workshop for North Pacific Armorhead Shimizu, Shizuoka, Japan March Meeting Report

BY CATCH IN NORWAY. HOW IT WORKS?

CCAMLR Licence notification

MEDIA BRIEFING NOTES

Focus on New Sites for Caves and Reefs Issues Identified. Dr. Leyla Knittweis-Mifsud Department of Biology, Faculty of Science University of Malta

Fishery Report 2017: Dissostichus eleginoides Kerguelen Islands French EEZ (Division )

BIO 164 MARINE BIOLOGY, SPRING 2017 [As of January 12, 2017]

Constraints to the Sustainability of Deep Sea Fisheries beyond National Jurisdiction

Progress Made by Tuna Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs)

Environmental Learning Outside the Classroom (ELOC)


CCAMLR's work on the elimination of seabird mortality associated with fishing (CCAMLR Secretariat, November 2007)

Delegation of French Territory

6 th Meeting of the Scientific Committee Puerto Varas, Chile, 9-14 September SC6-Doc21 Chinese Taipei s Annual Report

Certification Determination. Louisiana Blue Crab Commercial Fishery

Best Practice Guidance for Assessing the Financial Performance of Fishing Gear: Industry-led gear trials

North-East Atlantic Fisheries Commission. (OSPAR Agreement (Update 2018))

TAC Reported Landings * - By-catch only

HABITAT AREAS OF PARTICULAR CONCERN (HAPC) PROPOSAL

Transcription:

VME Encounter Protocols (VME indicators, thresholds and move-on-rules) Comparative study: SEAFO+NAFO+CCAMLR T. Nishida SEAFO Representative (Only for 3 days) (South East Atlantic Fisheries Organization) FAO North Pacific VME Workshop (Tokyo) Nishida March, 2014 1

Encounter Protocols Part of VME process To protect VMEs from bottom fishing activities that have significant adverse impacts UNGA Res 61/105 (2006)+FAO DSF Guidelines (2009) To protect VME, we need to consider [1W+2H] - What do we need to protect? VME indicators - How much do we need to protect? Thresholds - How far do we keep away to protect? Move-on-rule 2

What do we need to protect? VME Indicator (FAO DSF guideline)(2009)) The following examples of species groups, communities, habitats and features often display characteristics consistent with possible VMEs. Corals, hydroids, stony corals, gorgonians, black corals, hydrocorals, sponge, Protozoans, invertebrates [CAUTION] Merely detecting the presence of an element itself is not sufficient to identify a VME. Indicator should be a part of VME communities 3

In reality. VME indicators are largely different by RFMOs/CCAMLR Due to different geographical locations (habitats and topography) and objectives/ideas among RFMOs We now go through actual situation.. 4

VME indicators (Major species) by RFMO/CCAMLR (sponges, corals, sea squirts and erect bryozoans) Division (class/order) English name FAO CODE NAFO SEAFO CCAMLR Porifera Sponges PFR 1 1 1 Stony corals CSS 2 2 2 Cnidaria (Anthozoa /corlas) Gorgonian GGW 3 3 3 Sea pens NTW 4 4 4 Hydroides AZN 5 5 Zoanthids ZOT 6 6 Black corals AQZ 7 7 Soft corals AJZ 8 8 Tube-dwelling anemones ATX 5 9 Hydrocorals AXT 10 Chordata sea squirts SSX 6 9 11 Bryzoan Erect bryozoans BZN 7 10 12 5

VME indicators (minor species) CCAMLR lists many ecosystem Division Hemichordata Echinodermata Annelida English name FAO CODE NAFO SEAFO CCAMLR Sea lilies CWD 8 11 13 Basket stars OWP 12 Basket and snake stars Pencil spine urchins Serpulid tube worms OEQ 14 CVD 15 SZS 13 CXV 16 Brachiopoda Lamp shells BRQ 17 Arthropoda Mollusca Chemosynthetic communities Xenophyophores Acorn worms PBQ 18 Goose and acorn barnacles Antarctic scallop XEF 19 BWY 20 DMK 21 6

Number of VME indicators by RFMO/CCAMLR and Division(Order) Division NAFO SEAFO CCAMLR Sponges 1 Corals (order) Chordata Bryzoan Echino -dermata 4 7 9 1 (sea lilies) 1 (sea squirt) 1 (erect bryozoan) 2 (sea lilies+1) 3 (sea lilies+2) Others 0 1 6 total 7 13 21 7

How much do we need to protect? We need to consider Encounter threshold for each VME indicator 8

Encounter thresholds Criteria to prevent SAI (Significant Adverse Impact) Again different among RFMO/CCAMLR due to different habitats, abundance and ideas Now we review the current situation.. 9

CURRENT THRESHOLDS BY FISHERIES, INDICATOR AND RFMO/CCAMLR SEAFO (SPONGE) : DIFFERENT BY EXISTING AND NEW AREA FISHERIES VME INDICATOR TRAWL CORALS 7 KG (SEA PEN) BOTTOM LONGLINE POT (CRAB) RFMO/ORG NAFO SEAFO CCAMLR 60 KG (OTHERS) 60 KG SPONGES 300 KG 600 KG (EXITING) CORALS SPONGES CORALS SPONGES 7 KG (SEA PEN) 60 KG (OTHERS) 300 KG 400 KG (NEW) 10 VME UNITS(*) =10(L OR KG) /1000 (HOOKS OR 1200M) 10 VME UNITS(*) = 10(L OR KG)/1200M (*) includes ALL VME indicators defined by CCAMLR and SEAFO 10

Encounter threshold (values) How to evaluate? NAFO : GIS method Contour (biomass) estimation (e.g. sea pen) + (overlay) + Commercial trawl tow tracks Conduct virtual operation and simulation (Re-sampling sea pen) (cumulative) Freq. distribution of simulated (sea pen) weights Decide thresholds (arbitrary) (normally probability encounter < 1% ) 11

Encounter threshold (values) How to evaluate? CCAMLR (LL + Pot) 10 VME units Arbitrary Now, new evaluation is on-going (per comm. David Ramm data manager) SEAFO (no original methods) NAFO+CCAMLR methods applied 12

VME indicators subject to Encounter thresholds CCAMLR/SEAFO (Bottom LL + Pot) ALL VME indicators NAFO (Trawls and Bottom LL)+SEAFO (Trawls) Subject Only to Sea pen, other corals and sponges New attempt NAFO (2013) Small gorgonian (0.2 kg), large gorgonian(2kg) + 4 new indicators (new concept: presence) too small (was not agreed) 13

Number of VME indicators subject to thresholds by RFMO/CCAMLR and gear type NAFO SEAFO CCAMLR Division Trawls (+LL) (Trawls) LL+POT Sponges 1 Corals (order) 4 7 9 Chordata Bryzoan Echino -dermata (No Thresholds) 1 (sea squirt) 1 (erect bryozoan) 2 (sea lilies+1) 3 (sea lilies+2) Others 1 6 No (%) of VME indicators subject to thresholds (Total no of VME indicators) 5 (71%) 8 (62%) 13 (100%) 21 (100%) (7) (13) (13) (21) 14

How far do we need to move to protect VME (indicators)? Move-on-rule 15

Move-on-rules : After encounter, 2 important responsibilities for vessels (NAFO+SEAFO+CCAMLR ) If VME indicators weights > thresholds, Vessel shall Action (1) Move away 1-2 miles from the reference point of the Action (2) Report to Secretariat Establish closed (circle) areas (*) re-open gear to any if direction no SAI(significant Adverse Impact) avoiding further encounters (then re-start operation) Inform to CPCs (*) Once closed, same regulation imposed to re-open as in the closed area SC need to evaluate no SAI on VEM indicators for re-open 16

Action (1) How to move away? CCAMLR (1 nautical mile) (LL+POT) stop 1 nm Leave at least 1 nm away then re-start operation in ANY direction avoid further encounters Restart MID-point Deployed gear NAFO (2 nautical miles) (Trawl+LL) Restart 2 nm END-point stop 17

SEAFO: move-on rule a bit strange before Bottom LL and crab pot fisheries Previous rule (2011 or before) Leave at least 1 nm away then re-start operation ONLY PARALLEL direction Re-start 1 nm Deployed gear Can not necessarily avoid VME encounter stop (MID-point) New rule (2012 -) Leave at least 1nm away then re-start operation in ANY direction avoid further encounters (similar to CCAMLR) stop Re-start 1 nm (MID-point) Deployed gear 18

SEAFO: move-on rule new effective approach (2016) Trawl fisheries (LINE based) Previous rule (2015 or before) Leave at least 2 nm away then re-start operation ONLY PARALLEL direction Re-start 2nm Deployed gear Can not necessarily avoid VME encounter stop (MID-point) New rule (2016 -) Re-start Leave at least 2 nm away from LINE (Net deployed) then re-start operation in ANY direction avoid further encounters stop 2 nm 2 nm 2 nm Line (net deployed) 19

Summary : Move-on-rule (move away distances and management measure) GEAR FISHING TRAWL BOTTOM CRAB AREA (*) GROUNDS LL POT SET TO NAFO END BOTH 2 NM (POINT) CLOSED SEAFO MID EXISTING 2 NM 1 NM (POINT) AREA NEW (LINE)(*) 2 NM (POINT) CCAMLR MID BOTH 2 NM (POINT) RISK OR RECTANGLE (**) (*) Reference point (line) of the gear (**) CCAMLR RISK (closed) area (VME > 10 unit) Fine-scale rectangle area (VME > 5 units) not closed but for warning 20

Action (2): 2 nd responsibility (vessel) Report (> thresholds) to the Secretariat How is the situation? SEAFO+NAFO NO encounter reports to now CCAMLR YES (many reports) (e.g. Ross sea ) Risk (closed: circle) area Fine-scale (warning) NO closed (circle) area established rectangle area 21

NAFO: Special situation (ad hoc based closed area) No encounter report from commercial vessels But in the past, survey data show high concentration areas of VME indicators Closed areas proposed (Deep Sea ecosystem WG SC) and agreed (COM) (see recent example) 22

High Sea Pen concentration areas identified (Flemish Cap) 4 spots ( )were agreed (2013). 6 closed area (proposed): 4 west side agreed Current closed area (corals and sponges) Survey data has been used for closure NOT AGREED 23

Move-on rule or Closed area recent HOT dispute (NAFO) Scientists + some CPCs : prefer to closed area No encounter report more effective to protect VMEs Industries + some CPC: prefer to move-on rule More flexible to operate prefer to even recent complicate move-on rule (by SC), i.e., move longer distances to shallower waters 24

Summary Encounter Protocols (1W+2H) (NAFO+SEAFO+CCAMLR) (1) What do we protect? VME indicators Major : Corals (4-9 orders) and Sponges (1) Minor : Other benthos : CCAMLR(11) >SEAFO(5)>NAFO(3) (2) How much we need to protect? Thresholds Corals : 7-60kg Sponges :300-600kg (NAFO+SEAFO : Trawl) 10 VME units (@10kg) (all species) (CCAMLR+SEAFO : LL+POT) (3) How far do we need to move? Move-on-rule 1-2 nm from reference point or line of the gear closed area established (CCAMLR) 25

Thank you Good luck on your (NPFC) successful development on the VME process (from SEAFO SC) and Sayonara (5PM) FAO North Pacific VME Workshop (Tokyo) Nishida March, 2014 26