SAN DIEGUITO WETLANDS RESTORATION PROJECT 08 JANUARY 2018 BEACH PROFILES CITY OF DEL MAR, CALIFORNIA. Data Report

Similar documents
Volume and Shoreline Changes along Pinellas County Beaches during Tropical Storm Debby

STATE OF THE COAST 2016 Coastal Frontiers Corporation June 1, 2017

UPDATE OF RESTORED SAN DIEGUITO LAGOON INLET CHANNEL EXCAVATION AND DREDGING PLAN. (Previously submitted on 30 March 2006 as CE Reference # 04-19c)

Coastal Environments Oceanographic and Engineering Expertise

Performance of Upham Beach T-Groin Project and Its Impact to the Downdrift Beach

New Jersey Coastal Zone Overview. The New Jersey Beach Profile Network (NJBPN) 3 Dimensional Assessments. Quantifying Shoreline Migration

3.3 OCEANOGRAPHY/COASTAL PROCESSES

Southern California Beach Processes Study

HURRICANE SANDY LIMITED REEVALUATION REPORT UNION BEACH, NEW JERSEY DRAFT ENGINEERING APPENDIX SUB APPENDIX D SBEACH MODELING

CROSS-SHORE SEDIMENT PROCESSES

APPENDIX C. Fluvial and Tidal Hydraulics Report

CHAPTER 281 INFLUENCE OF NEARSHORE HARDBOTTOM ON REGIONAL SEDIMENT TRANSPORT

Beach Profiles. Topics. Module 9b Beach Profiles and Crossshore Sediment Transport 3/23/2016. CE A676 Coastal Engineering

Undertow - Zonation of Flow in Broken Wave Bores

Bay County, MI Coastal Hazard Analysis Flood Risk Review Meeting. May 14, 2018

UC San Diego Scripps Institution of Oceanography Technical Report

Undertow - Zonation of Flow in Broken Wave Bores

Mechanisms and Characteristics of High-Speed Reef Rip Current

CHAPTER 91 TRACKED VEHICLE FOR CONTINUOUS NEARSHORE PROFILES. Richard J. Seymour* Alan L. Higgins** David P. Bothman***

CURRENT, WAVE AND TIDAL OBSERVATIONS FROM A HORIZONTAL ACOUSTIC DOPPLER PROFILER INSTALLED ON SCRIPPS PIER IN LA JOLLA, CALIFORNIA, USA

Dune Monitoring Data Update Summary: 2013

OECS Regional Engineering Workshop September 29 October 3, 2014

Effectiveness of Beach Nourishment in Response to Sea Level Rise

Hydrographic Surveying Methods, Applications and Uses

Figure79. Location map for the 10 NJBPN profile sites in Atlantic County, NJ 155

Boothbay Harbor Rotary Club May 12, 2016

City of Del Mar Local Coastal Plan (LCP) Amendment for Sea Level Rise and Coastal Flooding

St. Louis County, MN Coastal Hazard Analysis Flood Risk Review Meeting. May 2, 2018

Baraga County, MI Coastal Hazard Analysis Flood Risk Review Meeting. July 12, 2018

A Preliminary Review of Beach Profile and Hardbottom Interactions

Lagrangian Tracer Transport and Dispersion in Shallow Tidal Inlets & River Mouths

Figure 1 Example feature overview.

SACO RIVER AND CAMP ELLIS BEACH SACO, MAINE SECTION 111 SHORE DAMAGE MITIGATION PROJECT APPENDIX F ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT

STATUS REPORT FOR THE SUBMERGED REEF BALL TM ARTIFICIAL REEF SUBMERGED BREAKWATER BEACH STABILIZATION PROJECT FOR THE GRAND CAYMAN MARRIOTT HOTEL

Bayfield & Ashland Counties, WI Coastal Hazard Analysis Flood Risk Review Meeting. June 05, 2018

New Jersey Beach Profile Network Atlantic County Profile Site Locations

Door County, WI Coastal Hazard Analysis Flood Risk Review Meeting. August 21, 2017

Affects of Tides on Lateral Coastal Access at. Las Varas Ranch. Gaviota, California. Photos Courtesy of California Coastal Records Project

APPENDIX M DREDGED MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (DMMP) FINAL INTEGRATED FEASIBILITY REPORT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Modeling Sediment Transport Along the Upper Texas Coast

2018 Annual Beach Monitoring Report

Physical Modeling of Nearshore Placed Dredged Material Rusty Permenter, Ernie Smith, Michael C. Mohr, Shanon Chader

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Parks Department

Sussex County, DE Preliminary Study Overview

Open Pacific Coast Study. California Coastal Analysis and Mapping Project

LAB: WHERE S THE BEACH

SEDIMENT BUDGET OF LIDO OF PELLESTRINA (VENICE) Written by Marcello Di Risio Under the supervision of Giorgio Bellotti and Leopoldo Franco

Beach Water Quality. Ewan Moffat, Environmental Health Specialist, Recreational Water Program

Technical Brief - Wave Uprush Analysis Island Harbour Club, Gananoque, Ontario

Kelly Legault, Ph.D., P.E. USACE SAJ

Figure 106. Locations of the 28 NJBPN profile stations in Ocean County, NJ.

G. Meadows, H. Purcell and L. Meadows University of Michigan

RUSSIAN RIVER ESTUARY STUDY

CLAM PASS RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN BATHYMETRIC MONITORING REPORT NO. 7 Including Interior Bay Dredge Cuts and Tidal Data

Coquitlam/Buntzen Project Water Use Plan

CHAPTER 179. Performance of a Submerged Breakwater for Shore Protection

Sea Level Rise and Coastal Flooding Why Waves Matter!

Coastal Engineering Technical Note

Investigation of the Impact of Beach Raking on Beach Accretion/Erosion: West End Beaches of Galveston Island, Texas 2007/ 2008

UPPER BEACH REPLENISHMENT PROJECT RELATED

HARBOUR SEDIMENTATION - COMPARISON WITH MODEL

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUILDING STRONG LOS ANGELES DISTRICT

SUPPLEMENTAL DOCUMENT SEA LEVEL RISE SCENARIO SELECTION AND DESIGN TIDE CALCULATION

The History of Coastal Flood Hazard Assessments in the Great Lakes

Activity #1: The Dynamic Beach

Chapter 10 Lecture Outline. The Restless Oceans

Cove Point Beach Restoration: Utilization of a Spawning Habitat by Horseshoe Crabs (Limulus polyphemus)

The Cumulative Impacts of Shoreline Armoring on Forage Fish Spawning Habitat in San Juan County, Washington

Eelgrass Survey Reporting Form 2222 Channel Road Newport Beach, CA Eelgrass (Zostera marina) Survey

Theory and Application Introductory Oceanography Ray Rector: Instructor

Beach profile surveys and morphological change, Otago Harbour entrance to Karitane May 2014 to June 2015

Homework 2 Bathymetric Charts [based on the Chauffe & Jefferies (2007)]

South Bay Coastal Ocean Observing System California Clean Beaches Initiative

Beach Renourishment in Jacksonville

MAR 110 LECTURE #15 Wave Hazards

TITLE: The Importance of Model Validation: Two Case Studies. AUTHOR:Julie Thomas. Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA.

TIDES. Theory and Application

Reading Material. Inshore oceanography, Anikouchine and Sternberg The World Ocean, Prentice-Hall

Inlet Management Study for Pass-A-Grille and Bunces Pass, Pinellas County, Florida

Surveying Fundamentals and Practices, 5/e

Homework 2a Bathymetric Charts [based on the Chauffe & Jefferies (2007)]

AN OVERVIEW OF RECENT PROJECTS RELATED TO SAND BUDGETS, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BEACHES

AD-A II~lllII I I 7

TRANSPORT OF NEARSHORE DREDGE MATERIAL BERMS

2 Field Practices & Measurements

FEMA Region V. Great Lakes Coastal Flood Study. Pilot Study Webinar. Berrien County, Michigan. February 26, 2014

MEETING NOTICE AND AGENDA

DEVELOPING A SEAWALL ALGORITHM FOR THE DNR MODEL WITH APPLICATION TO THE OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA, COASTLINE

Regional Analysis of Extremal Wave Height Variability Oregon Coast, USA. Heidi P. Moritz and Hans R. Moritz

First Year Morphological Evolution of an Artificial Berm at Fort Myers Beach, Florida

Chapter 11. Beach Fill and Soft Engineering Structures

A process based approach to understand WA s complex coastline Jeff Hansen Ryan Lowe Graham Symonds Laura Segura Gundula Winter

Southwest Washington Littoral Drift Restoration Project: Design, Construction, and Monitoring

Beach Nourishment Impact on Beach Safety and Surfing in the North Reach of Brevard County, Florida

Sediment Transport Analysis Village of Asharoken, New York

Delaware Chapter Surfrider Foundation - Indian River Inlet Monitoring

Prediction of Nearshore Waves and Currents: Model Sensitivity, Confidence and Assimilation

Figure 46. Locations of the 28 NJBPN profile stations in Ocean County, NJ. A new site was added in the Borough of Seaside Heights (#248).

2016 NC Coastal Local Governments Annual Meeting

Evaluation of June 9, 2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Study for Town of Weymouth, Norfolk, Co, MA

Transcription:

SAN DIEGUITO WETLANDS RESTORATION PROJECT 08 JANUARY 2018 BEACH PROFILES CITY OF DEL MAR, CALIFORNIA Data Report Prepared by Coastal Environments, Inc. 2166 Avenida de la Playa, Suite E La Jolla, CA 92037 Prepared for Southern California Edison Company 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemead, CA 91770 12 January 2018

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 2.0 PERMIT REQUIREMENTS... 1 3.0 METHODS AND PROCEDURES... 1 4.0 BEACH PROFILE SURVEY RESULTS... 3 5.0 REFERENCES... 4 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A. 08 January 2018 Beach Profiles... A-1 Appendix B. 08 January 2018 Beach Widths...B-1 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Beach profile onshore survey marker locations...2 Table 2. Beach width adjustment to City of Del Mar Shoreline Protection Area Line...6 Table B-1. Beach widths (ft) from 08 January 2018 beach profile surveys referenced to benchmarks...b-2 Table B-2. Beach widths (ft) from 08 January 2018 beach profile surveys adjusted to City of Del Mar Shore Protection Area...B-2 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Schematic illustration of survey method...5 Figure 2. Beach profiles surveyed on 08 January 2018...7 Figure A-1. Beach profile for SIO1 surveyed on 08 January 2018... A-2 Figure A-2. Beach profile for SIO2 surveyed on 08 January 2018... A-3 Figure A-3. Beach profile for SIO5B surveyed on 08 January 2018... A-4 Figure A-4. Beach profile for SIO6 surveyed on 08 January 2018... A-5 Figure A-5. Beach profile for SIOA surveyed on 08 January 2018... A-6 Figure A-6. Beach profile for SIOB surveyed on 08 January 2018... A-7 Figure A-7. Beach profile for SIOC surveyed on 08 January 2018... A-8 Coastal Environments i Data Report

SAN DIEGUITO WETLANDS RESTORATION PROJECT 08 JANUARY 2018 BEACH PROFILES AT CITY OF DEL MAR, CALIFORNIA Data Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report describes the beach profiles surveyed along the Del Mar and Solana Beach coastline near the San Dieguito Lagoon inlet on 08 January 2018. The survey program is designed to comply with permit conditions set forth in Coastal Development Permit (No. 06-04- 088), issued by the California Coastal Commission (CCC) for the San Dieguito Wetlands Restoration Project. 2.0 PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The permit requires offshore beach profiles to be performed at seven (7) locations near the inlet to the San Dieguito Wetlands. Four (4) of the profiles are to be at historic profile locations, including DM-0590 (SIO1), DM-0580 (SIO2), SIO5B, and SIO6. Three (3) new profiles are located south of SIO1: 500 feet (SIOA), 1,000 feet (SIOB), and 1,500 feet (SIOC) south of SIO1. Table 1 outlines the locations of the beach profiles. The permit also requires that full profile (offshore/onshore) surveys are to be performed in the spring (April) and fall (October) for the seven profiles, and wading/onshore profiles are to be performed quarterly. All of the surveys are to be referenced to the City of Del Mar s Shore Protection Area (SPA) line, or to a fixed and identified feature for the site north of the SPA line (SIO6). The full profile surveys are to go to the depth of closure, where there are no substantial changes in bottom profile due to seasonal variations in wave conditions. The depth of closure has ranged from 35 ft to 50 ft in San Diego County (SANDAG, 2009). This report provides beach profile data and analysis of the winter 2018 beach profile surveys carried out on 08 January 2018, as required by the permit. 3.0 METHODS AND PROCEDURES The beach profiles were conducted from the benchmarks to wading depth by total station and prism. Data were acquired along each transect from the survey marker to an offshore limit below MLLW (Mean Lower Low Water). Each survey marker (benchmark) was located at the back of the beach at a fixed point, primarily along a protective seawall. Data were collected at least to -6 ft, MLLW. The beach and surf zone were surveyed using an electronic total station and survey rod. The total station was used to determine the position and elevation of the beach at each location Coastal Environments 1 Data Report

Table 1. Beach profile onshore survey marker locations. Benchmark California State Plane Coordinates, Zone 6 (ft), NAD83 Elevation, NGVD29 Northing Easting (ft) SIO1 1935951.7 6248823.5 13.5 SIO2 1934061.9 6249131.2 13.9 SIO5B 1936546.4 6248650.6 16.4 SIO6 1938477.3 6248035.2 18.0 SIOA 1935521.4 6248888.9 14.8 SIOB 1935008.3 6248975.3 14.7 SIOC 1934488.5 6249054.7 15.3 Coastal Environments 2 Data Report

occupied by the rod. A Sokkia Set-5A total station and Spectra Precision Ranger electronic field data logger were utilized to collect the nearshore portion of the profile, providing an accuracy of approximately 2-4 cm both horizontally and vertically. The total station method reflects an infrared beam sent from the device to a prism atop a fixed-length pole, where the instrument measures the slant distance and horizontal and vertical angles to the target (Figure 1). An electronic field data logger is used to store the data, which can then be set to known positions using permanent local benchmarks. Each transect was surveyed from the back of the beach seaward through the surf zone until the rod no longer protruded above the water surface. The beach width was calculated from the Del Mar SPA line to 0 ft, NGVD, except for SIO6, which was calculated from the benchmark. The distance of the profile benchmarks to the SPA line is shown in Table 2. 4.0 BEACH PROFILE SURVEY RESULTS The winter 2018 beach profile surveys were performed on 08 January 2018 along the four historic and three newly established profiles (Figure 2). The beach profiles are presented in Appendix A. The beach width for each of the profiles is presented in Appendix B. Coastal Environments 3 Data Report

5.0 REFERENCES SANDAG, 2009. Regional Beach Monitoring Program, Annual Report. June 2010, Chatsworth, CA. 111 pp. + app. Coastal Environments 4 Data Report

Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the survey method. Coastal Environments 5 Data Report

Table 2. Beach width adjustment to City of Del Mar Shoreline Protection Area Line. Benchmark Adjustment (ft) SIO1 +1.4 SIO2 +1.0 SIO5B +32.2 SIO6 0 SIOA +1.5 SIOB -4.2 SIOC +9.3 Coastal Environments 6 Data Report

Figure 2. Beach profiles surveyed on 08 January 2018. Coastal Environments 7 Data Report

APPENDIX A 08 JANUARY 2018 BEACH PROFILES Coastal Environments A-1 Data Report

Figure A-1. Beach profile for SIO1 surveyed on 08 January 2018. Coastal Environments A-2 Data Report

Figure A-2. Beach profile for SIO2 surveyed on 08 January 2018. Coastal Environments A-3 Data Report

Figure A-3. Beach profile for SIO5B surveyed on 08 January 2018. Coastal Environments A-4 Data Report

Figure A-4. Beach profile for SIO6 surveyed on 08 January 2018. Coastal Environments A-5 Data Report

Figure A-5. Beach profile for SIOA surveyed on 08 January 2018. Coastal Environments A-6 Data Report

Figure A-6. Beach profile for SIOB surveyed on 08 January 2018. Coastal Environments A-7 Data Report

Figure A-7. Beach profile for SIOC surveyed on 08 January 2018. Coastal Environments A-8 Data Report

APPENDIX B 08 JANUARUY 2018 BEACH WIDTHS Coastal Environments B-1 Data Report

Table B-1. Beach widths (ft) from 08 January 2018 beach profile surveys referenced to benchmarks. Date SIO1 SIO2 SIO5B SIO6 SIOA SIOB SIOC 08 January 2018 53.83 216.55 75.4 161.32 162.57 158.34 200.21 Table B-2. Beach widths (ft) from 08 January 2018 beach profile surveys adjusted to City of Del Mar Shore Protection Area. Date SIO1 SIO2 SIO5 SIO6 SIOA SIOB SIOC 08 January 2018 55.23 217.55 107.7 161.32 164.07 154.14 209.51 Note CCC conditions: (1) The beach width at DM-0590 (SIO1) is at or less than 32.4 feet (the lowest historically observed minimum); (2) The beach width at DM-0590 (SIO1) is at or less than 90 feet, and there is more than a 180-foot difference in beach widths measured at DM-0590 and DM-0580 (SIO1 and SIO2); or (3) The beach width at SD-0595 (SIO5) is at or less than 74 feet (the lowest historically observed minimum). Coastal Environments B-2 Data Report