THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA PANAJI GOA No: HCB/GOA/PB/16/2018 Dated: 20/02/2018 NOTIFY BOARD List of Cases wherein, the List of documents to be added in the Paper Book are not furnished and/or the Printing charges towards preparation of the Paper Book are not deposited. The Advocate shall within 14 days from the publication of this list, take necessary step. In default, such matters will be placed on Board of the Ld. Registrar for Orders. Page : 1 SR CASE NO. ADVOCATE PARTY REMARK 1 SA/17/2014 ADV. VALLABH D. PANGAM FOR PETITIONER U/LAS DEEPAK SALGAONKAR VISHRANTI SAPERKAR SAKARAM DHANANJAY PRTG CHARGES TOWARDS PREPARATION OF PAPERBOOKS IS NOT DEPOSITED TILL DATE. ADV. ALMEIDA COUTHO CLEOFATO GARRETT RESPONDENT ADV. SHAILESH REDKAR FOR RESPONDENT 2 SA/77/2014 ADV. ASHW D. BHOBE ADV. U. KHOT 3 SA/85/2014 ADV. ASHW D. BHOBE ADV. R. GAWAS ADV. R. G. RAMANI FOR R.NO. 1 TO 3 SHAIK AKTAR ALI AND 5 SHAIKH KASSIM ANANT GANPAT PAIDARKAR SHYAM KASHATH KANEKAR AND 2 PRTG CHARGES TOWARDS PREPARATION OF PAPERBOOKS IS NOT DEPOSITED TILL DATE. PRTG CHARGES TOWARDS THE PREPARATION OF PAPERBOOKS IS NOT DEPOSITED TILL DATE. 4 CRIA/50/2016 ADV. ARUN DE SA ADV. SIDHESH SHET ADV. PRAV N. FALDESSAI FOR RESPONDENT ZENITO CARDOZO STATE THROUGH PP AS PER THE ORDER DTD. 30/1/18, TILL DATE DEPOSITION TO BE ANNEXED NOT CLARIFIED. 5 CRIA/55/2017 ADV. DATTAPRASAD LAWANDE ADV. RAJESH K SHIVOLKAR ADV. ASHVEK GOSAVI ADV. AMOGH V. PRABHUDESAI ADV. JOS.PETER D'SOUZA FOR R.NO.2 CENTRAL BUREAU OF VESTIGATION, SPECIAL CRIME BRANCH, MUMBAI., SAMSON D'SOUZA AND TILL DATE THE LIST OF DOCS TO BE ADDED THE PAPERBOOKS IS NOT SUBMITTED.
Page : 2 SR CASE NO. ADVOCATE PARTY REMARK Assistant Registrar High Court of Bombay at Goa Causelists generated by NIC-GHC on 20-02-2018
THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA PANAJI GOA No: J/ /2018 Dated: 20/02/2018 N O T I C E (See Chapter VII Rule 6 of the Bombay High Court, Appellate Side Rule, 1960.) List of cases showing the notice that have been returned unserved / step not taken. The Advocate shall with in One month of publication of this list take necessary steps as per above Rules. In default, such matter will be placed before the Ld. Registrar on 19/03/2018. Page : 1 SR CASE NO. ADVOCATE PARTY RESP. UNSERVE REMARK 1 CA/207/2016 WP/267/2016 ADV. ADITI KAMAT ADV. ASHWI AGNI ADV. DIVIYA BAKAL ADV. PRADOSH P. DANGUI AGA FOR R.NO.1 TO 9 SANJAY V. REDKAR AND 18 STATE OF GOA THR. ITS CHIEF SECRETARY AND 9 STEPS TO BE TAKEN RESPECT OF THE UNSERVED RESPONDENT NOS. 13, 16,19, 20, 21, 22 & 24. 2 WP/39/2017 ADV. GAURISH N. AGNI FOR PETITIONERS ADV. EESHAN USAPKAR FOR PETITIONERS ADV. FERNANDES ANABEL ELDOMA FURTADO FOR PETITIONE ADV. ALMEIDA COUTHO CLEOFATO GARRETT R-2(A-F) ADV. SHAILESH REDKAR R-2(A-F) BABANI DHARMU ADEL (DEC) REP. BY HIS LRS. AND 5 MADHUKAR ANANT SHELDEKAR, REP. BY HIS ATT. PARESH GHADI AND STEPS TO BE TAKEN RESPECT OF THE UNSERVED RESPONDENT NOS.1(B) & 1(C)AS THEY ARE RESIDG ABROAD. 3 CRIR/57/2016 ADV. ANTHONY JOE D'SILVA ADV. ASHW D. BHOBE FOR RESPONDENT ADV. BHOBE SHRADHA SUBHASH FOR RESPONDENT RAJKUMAR GIRDHARLAL KAHTWANI PANKAJ DESAI VIEW OF ORDER DATED 28/11/2017, ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER HAS WITHDRAWN HIS APPEARANCE. TILL DATE NO COUNSEL HAS FILED VAKALATNAMA ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER. HENCE, MATTER NOTIFIED. Assistant Registrar High Court of Bombay at Goa Causelists generated by NIC-GHC on 20-02-2018
THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA PANAJI GOA No: J/ /2018 Dated: 20/02/2018 N O T I C E (See Chapter VII Rule 6 of the Bombay High Court, Appellate Side Rule, 1960.) List of cases showing the notice that have been returned unserved / step not taken. The Advocate shall with in One month of publication of this list take necessary steps as per above Rules. In default, such matter will be placed before the Ld. Registrar on 05.04.2018. Page : 1 SR CASE NO. ADVOCATE PARTY RESP. UNSERVE REMARK 1 FA/86/2009 MR. ROHIT BRAS DE SA SHRI R.G. RAMANI FOR RES.1 & 2 VISHNU KRISHNA HARWALKAR AND 7 UDAY RAMNATH POKLE AND 4 AS PER FARAD ENDORSEMENT DATED 5.1.2018 NOTICE OF APPELLANT NOS. 3 & 4 ARE RETURNED BACK UNSERVED WITH THE POSTAL REMARK "PARTY EXPIRED". ADVOCATE TO TAKE STEPS R/O. APPELLANT NOS. 3 & 4. 2 FA/94/2009 MR. A. D. BHOBE SHRI R.G.RAMANI FOR RESP.7 ADV. AMIRA ABDUL RAZAQ FOR R.NO.1,2,3 & 4 MICHAEL DIAS SAPECO VILLAGE PANCHAYAT OF ST. CRUZ THROUGH CHAIRMAN AND 8 VIEW OF ORDER DATED 9/12/17 STEPS TO BE TAKEN TO BRG ON RECORD THE LR'S OF THE DECEASED APPELLANT. 3 FA/242/2009 MR. D. J. PANGAM EDVIGES FERNANDES AND ANTONIO ACIO MASCARENHAS AND S.C.S.- AS PER FARAD ENDORSEMENT DATED 17.11.2017 RESPONDENT NOS.1 & 2 ARE EXPIRED. HENCE ADVOCATE TO TAKE STEPS TO BRG THEIR LR'S ON RECORD. 4 FA/20/2010 MR. NIKHIL VAZE ADV. DEVIDAS J. PANGAM FOR APPELLANT THE EDC LIMITED THROUGH AUTHORIZED OFFICER K. V. BALLIKAR PROFESSIONAL AUDIO VIDEO STUDIO AND 2 AS PER FARAD ENDORSEMENT DATED 24.11.2017 NOTICES OF R. NO.1 & 3 RETURNED BACK UNSERVED. ADVOCATE TO TAKE STEPS R/O. R.NOS. 1 & 3. 5 CRA/46/2012 SAHISH MAHAMBREY H.H. FRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD., THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY SUNIL VARMA ALLAN JAMES TAYLOR REP. THROUGH KANTA M. PALNI AFFI. OF SERVICE NOT FILED R/O. PUBLICATION NOTICE ISSUED TO RESPONDENT ON 23.06.2017, TILL DATE STEPS NOT TAKEN R/O UNSERVED RESPONDENT. 6 AO/18/2013 NIT SARDESSAI ADV. SOMNATH B. KARPE FOR R.NO.1,2A TO 2L, 3 TO 17 HARBDAR SGH BEDI THROUGH POA MAURICE BRITTO SAIFULLA KHAN AND STEPS TO BE TAKEN R/O R. NOS. 5 TO 10, 17, 56 AND LR'S OF R. NO.19.
Page : 2 SR CASE NO. ADVOCATE PARTY RESP. UNSERVE REMARK 7 FA/24/2014 ADV. SHIVAN DESAI ADV. K. PARAB ADV. SOMNATH B. KARPE R.NO. 1,2,3A TO 3H,4 TO 9C ADV. VOD VISHNU KORGAONKAR R.NO. 1,2,3A TO 3H,4 ADV. VLEDSON LUCIO BRAGANZA R.NO. 1,2,3A TO 3H,4 T ADV. JOCELYN GODHO R.NO. 1,2,3A TO 3H,4 TO 9C REMO JOAO DIAS AND 4 BENEDITA DORES SALVADOR AFONSO REP. BY REPS. NO. 2 AND 9 SERVICE REPORT OF OVERSEAS POSTG R/O. R. NOS. 4A, 5, 6 & 6A AWAITED. 8 FA/117/2015 ADV. JAGANNATH JAYANT MULGAONKAR ADV. JAYANT PANDURANG MULGAONKAR ADV. ANUSHA D KAISUKAR ADV. SIYA DHARGALKAR STELA FERNANDES @ STELA MARTS AND ANTHONY MARTS @ ANTON MARTS AND AS PER FARAD ENDORSEMENT DATED 13.02.2018 NOTICES OF R.NOS. 4, 5 AND 8 ARE RETURNED BACK UNSERVED. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE/ACK. SLIP R/O. NOTICE BY OVERSEAS POSTG ISSUED TO R.NO.3.NOT SUBMITTED. STEPS TO BE TAKEN TO RE-SERVE THE R. NOS. 4, 5 AND 8. 9 FA/50/2016 ADV. NARAYAN DATTARAM GOVEKAR ADV. VAMAN GANESH KURTIKAR ADV. SANMAN R. KENY FOR R.NO.1,2,3 & 4 IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL SURANCE CO. LTD., THR. ITS AUT. SIG. SAURABH SGH. CHANDRAKALA SADANAND KERKAR @ VASTAL AND 5 ORS. AS PER FARAD ENDORSEMENT DATED 17.02.2018 NOTICE OF R. NO.6 IS RETURNED BACK UNSERVED AS NOBODY COULD IDENTIFY THE SAID RESPONDENT NOR HIS RESIDENCE. STEPS TO BE TAKEN TO RE-SERVE THE R. NO.6. 10 FA/67/2016 ADV. MAHESH AMONKAR ADV. CLOVIS DA COSTA A. MONTEIRO FOR RESPONDENT ADV. ANALIZ M. MENEZES FOR RESPONDENT SOUTHALL ESTATE AGENTS, REP. BY ITS ATT. AVTAR SGH. SANATAN F. AND REAL ESTATE PVT. LTD. REP BY SAVITRI KUMAR (EXPIRED) NOW REP. BY TWO DIRECTORS NOTICE OF R-1(A) IS RETURNED BACK UNSERVED AS THE SAID RESPONDENT RESIDES ABROAD (U.K). STEPS TO BE TAKEN TO SERVE R-1(A).
Page : 3 SR CASE NO. ADVOCATE PARTY RESP. UNSERVE REMARK 11 FA/88/2016 ADV. JAMADAR AMIRKUSRO GULAMRASUL THE EXECUTIVE ENGEER, WORKS DIVISION-VII (NH), PWD, PANAJI., NAVELKAR ESTATE DEVELOPERS., VIEW OF ORDER DT. 10/11/2017 PASSED BY HON'BLE COURT TILL DATE WAKALATNAMA NOT FILED ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT. 12 FA/93/2016 ADV. AMEY JAGDISH SAI KAKODKAR ADV. SIDHA KURTIKAR ADV. DIPTY BHOMKAR ADV. R. GAWAS FOR R.NO.1, 2 & 3 ADV. SANTOSH HARI BHARNE FOR R.NO.5 NATIONAL SURANCE COMPANY LTD., THR. ITS MANAGER., TULSHIDAS L. KERKAR AND 6 AS PER FARAD ENDORSEMENT DATED 23.01.2018 NOTICE OF R.NO.6 IS RETURNED BACK UNSERVED FOR WANT OF DETAILED ADDRESS. SERVICE REPORT AWAITED R/O. R.NO.5. 13 FA/103/2016 ADV. U. R. TIMBLE ADV. YADIKA MANDREKAR ADV. VAMAN GANESH KURTIKAR FOR R.NO.1 & 2 ADV. NARAYAN DATTARAM GOVEKAR FOR R.NO.1 & 2 THE NEW DIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD., JAYSHREE G. GAUNDER @ GOUNDER AND 3 CP - AS PER FARAD ENDORSEMENT DATED 13.02.2018 NOTICE OF R-3 RETURNED BACK UNSERVED AS THE SAID RESPONDENT IS RESIDG AT GOA FROM LAST 10 YRS, FORMATION GIVEN BY HIS FATHER.ADVOCATE TO TAKE STEPS R/O. R.NO.3. 14 FA/17/2017 ADV. AMEY JAGDISH SAI KAKODKAR ADV. DIPTY BHOMKAR ADV. PRIYA PGULKAR ADV. NARAYAN DATTARAM GOVEKAR FOR R.NO.1 THE NEW DIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD., SWAJAY @ AMAR NARAHARI BHOSLE AND 2 AS PER FARAD ENDORSEMENT DATED 16.02.2018 NOTICES OF R. NOS.2 & 3 ARE RETURNED BACK UNSERVED AS THE SAID RESPONDENTS ARE NOT FOUND AT THE GIVEN ADDRESS. STEPS TO BE TAKEN TO RE-SERVE THE R. NOS.2 & 3. 15 FA/18/2017 ADV. KHOLKAR PREMANAND ANAND ADV. DEEPIKA T. FATERPEKAR ADV. NISHANT P. SHIRGAOKAR CHOLU D. ROSAR AND 5 SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, NORTH GOA DISTRICT (KRC)., LAC - AS PER FARAD ENDORSEMENT DATED 25.01.2018 NOTICE OF RESPONDENT IS RETURNED BACK UNSERVED AS THE SAID OFFICE IS MARGAO AND NOT PANAJI. STEPS TO BE TAKEN TO RE-SERVE THE RESPONDENT.
Page : 4 SR CASE NO. ADVOCATE PARTY RESP. UNSERVE REMARK 16 FA/46/2017 ADV. BETQUECAR KARISHMA CUSTA ADV. ANKITA TARI ADV. MR. ARUN A. S. TALAULIKAR FOR RESPONDENTS SITA ANTAO E MASCARENHAS AND STATE OF GOA, THR. CHIEF SECRETARY AND 9 CS - AS PER FARAD ENDORSEMENT DATED 16.02.2018 NOTICE OF R. NOS. 7 & 8 ARE RETURNED BACK UNSERVED AS THE SAID RESPONDENTS LEFT THE HOUSE SCE 2013 AND WHEREABOUTS NOT KNOWN. FORMATION GIVEN BY THE FATHER OF R-7 BY NAME MR. SURYANARAYAN HALWAI. STEPS TO BE TAKEN TO RE-SERVE THE R. NOS. 7 & 8. 17 FA/60/2017 ADV. PRACHI SAWANT ADV. VISHWADH SARDESSAI APPELLANT THE OFFICE OF THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, PWD PANAJI AND DR. VISHWANATH RAGHUVIR SAI HEDE ALSO KNOWN AS VISHWANATH RAGHUVIR SAI EDO., LAC - AS PER FARAD ENDORSEMENT DATED 16.02.2018 NOTICE OF RESPONDENT IS RETURNED BACK UNSERVED AS STAYG AT ANOTHER PLACE. STEPS TO BE TAKEN TO RE-SERVE THE RESPONDENT. 18 FA/123/2017 ADV. P. P. SGH ALVARO JOAQUIM SANTANA GOMES (DEC) REP. BY HIS LRS. AND RAJESH RAGHUNATH NAIK AND SUFFICIENT POSTAL CHARGES ARE PAID TO ISSUE ADMIT NOTICES. 19 MCA/583/2017 STM/2042/2017 ADV. VAMAN GANESH KURTIKAR BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL SURANCE CO. LTD., THR. ITS AUT. SIGN., NILESH SUBHASHCHANDRA GANDHI., RUPESH ARVD NAIK AND 3 - NOTICES OF R.NOS. 1 & 2 RETURNED BACK UNSERVED WITH REMARK - LEFT THE ADDRESS AND THEIR WHEREABOUTS ARE NOT KNOWN. Assistant Registrar High Court of Bombay at Goa Causelists generated by NIC-GHC on 20-02-2018
THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA PANAJI GOA Dated: 22/02/2018 N O T I C E (See Chapter V Rule 3(ii) of the Bombay High Court, Appellate Side Rule, 1960.) List of Stamps notified for clarify Office Objections with in 14 days from today Page : 1 1 STM/3949/2017 ADV. ARMANDO MAXIMIANO FERNANDES ADV. MR. ARUN A. S. TALAULIKAR R.NO.3 ARMANDO MAXIMIANO FERNANDES. SHRIVAS DEMPO AND 2 1.COPY IS NOT SERVED. 2.COURT FEES IS NOT SIGNED. 3.PARA 27 OF THE PETITION IS NOT PROPERLY WORDED. 4.SYNOPSIS IS NOT DATED AND SIGNED BY THE PETITIONER. 2 STM/3968/2017 ADV. ARMANDO MAXIMIANO FERNANDES ARMANDO MAXIMIANO FERNANDES. THE GOA GOVERNMENT, THE STATE OF GOA, REP. BY THE ADVOCATE GENERAL, FOR THE STATE OF GOA. 1) COURT FEE IS NOT AFFIXED ON THE APPLICATION. 2) CONDONATION OF DELAY IS NOT FILED, WITH PROPER REASONS. 3) COPY OF ORDER DT. 17/6/16 IS NOT ANNEXED. 4) CAPTION IS NOT PROPER. 3 STM/4175/2017 ADV. JAGANNATH JAYANT MULGAONKAR PREMANAND FONDU NAIK., MESCAPE MERAL PVT. LTD. AND 10 1.NO COURT FEES IS AFFIXED ON APPEAL. 2.NO ITIAL ON PG NO. 8. 3.CONDONATION OF DELAY OF APPL. IS NOT FILED. APPLICATION IS BARRED FROM LIMITATION. 4.HANDWRITTEN PG 44. 5.MARKG ON PG 75, 76. 6.NO PRAYER APPEAL. 7.ANNEXURE STATEMENT NOT MADE. 4 STM/4176/2017 ADV. JAGANNATH JAYANT MULGAONKAR PREMANAND FONDU NAIK., MESCAPE MERAL PVT. LTD. AND 10 1.NO PRAYER IS MENTIONED. 2.DEX AT SR. 3 IS NOT PROPER. DTD OF JMT & DECREE IS NOT TALLYG. 3.NO COURT FEES IS AFFIXED ON APPEAL. 4.ANNEXURE STATEMENT IS 5.DEX AT SR NO. 5 IS NOT PROPER. 6.MARKG ON PG 80, 81, 95. 7.NO PG NO. IS GIVEN TO PG AFTER 49 TILL PG 77.
Page : 2 5 STM/4179/2017 ADV. ASHW D. BHOBE ADV. BHOBE SHRADHA SUBHASH ROQUE SEBASTIAO BOMPARTE MARTS., FRANCISCO MARTS AND 1.HANDWRITTEN PGS 23, 39, 71 AND 120. 2.PG 107 NOT PROPERLY ARRANGED. 3.PAGATION IS NOT PROPER. 4.PRESENTATION FORM IS COMPLETE. 5.PGS 23 TO 26, 42 NOT PROPERLY LEGIBLE. 6.MARKGS ON PGS 20, 50-52, 55, 83, 84, 87, 89, 91, 93, 94, 100, 104, 105, 117 TO 119. 7.DEX IS COMPLETE. 8.NO PROPER MARG ON PG 79 AND 80. 6 STM/4180/2017 ADV. JAGANNATH JAYANT MULGAONKAR RADHABAI SHETYE (DEC) THR. LRS. AND 4 STEPHEN HORATIO IGNATITUS, THR. HSI ATTORNEY, AVDHUT VITHAL POLE., 1.COPY OF JMT & ORDER DT. 23/7/13 AS MENTIONED PRAYER CLAUSE (A) NOT ANNEXED. 2.COURT FEE NOT AFFIXED ON AFFIDAVIT. 7 STM/4182/2017 ADV. AMIRA ABDUL RAZAQ THE STATE OF GOA, THR. CHIEF SECRETARY AND GOPALKRISHNA SHANTARAM BORKAR., 1.STATEMENT OF REG. ADD. 2.DOCUMENT AS STATED DEX NOT ANNEXED. 3.MEMO OF APPEARANCE IS NOT PROPER. 4.PAGATION IS COMPLETE. 5.PRESENTATION FORM IS COMPLETE. 6.DEX IS COMPLETE. 8 STM/4185/2017 ADV. PRASHEEN LOTLIKAR GANGADHAR VASUDEV KAVLEKAR AND 3 PREMKANT HARI KAVLEKAR AND 6 1.DEX NOT SIGNED AND SYNOPSIS ALSO NOT SIGNED. 2.PRESENTATION FORM IS COMPLETE. 3.DATE NOT PUT ON VAKALATNAMA. 4.STATEMENT OF ANNEXURE/ EXHIBIT 9 STA/4186/2017 STM/4185/2017 ADV. PRASHEEN LOTLIKAR GANGADHAR VASUDEV KAVLEKAR AND 3 PREMKANT HARI KAVLEKAR AND 6 1) MA MATTER IS UNDER OFFICE OBJECTIONS.
Page : 3 10 STM/4193/2017 ADV. USGAONKAR SUDESH MANOHAR ADV. MARIE ROSETTE PEREIRA GLOBAL CONVEYOR SYSTEMS PVT. LTD., THR. ITS AUT. REP., S.R. PRABHU., STATE OF GOA, THR. THE CHIEF SECRETARY AND 3 1.PGS 20-22 NOT PROPERLY LEGIBLE. 2.COPY IS NOT SERVED. 11 STM/4194/2017 ADV. RYAN DA PIEDADE MENEZES ADV. GA MARIA ALMEIDA SHREE CHANDRESWAR BHUTNATH DEVASTHAN, REP. BY ITS ATTORNEY, PRAKASH A.G. DESSAI., BABOY MOTIRAM VERENKAR (DEC) REP. BY HIS LRS., 1.COPY OF PLAT & WRITTEN STATEMENT NOT FILED. 2.COURT FEE NOT AFFIXED ON MEMO OF APPEAL. 3.AFFIDAVIT NOT FILED. 4.WAKALATNAMA NOT FILED. 12 STM/4195/2017 ADV. PRASHEEN LOTLIKAR GUNAVANTI PACO PILARNEKAR, THR. POA BY PETITIONER NO. 16 AND 15 BALCHANDRA ANANT VAGLE AND 1.DEX IS COMPLETE. 2.NO PROPER MARG ON PG 57, 59, 61, 63. 3.PAGATION IS NOT PROPER. 4.MARKG ON PG 51. 5.STATEMENT OF EXHIBIT NOT MADE. 13 STM/4197/2017 ADV. RYAN DA PIEDADE MENEZES JAGDISH KUMAR DHGRA., THE STATE OF GOA, THR. POLICE SPECTOR, VASCO POLICE STATION, VASCO AND 2 1.PG NOS. NOT MENTIONED PROPERLY DEX. 2.COPY IS NOT SERVED. 3.COURT FEE NOT AFFIXED ON WAKALATNAMA. 4.COURT FEE AFFIXED IS SUFFICIENT ON MEMO OF PETITION. 14 STM/4198/2017 ADV. RYAN DA PIEDADE MENEZES ADV. GA MARIA ALMEIDA JAGDISH KUMAR DHGRA., THE STATE OF GOA, THR. POLICE SPECTOR, VASCO POLICE STATION, VASCO AND 2 1.PG NOS. NOT MENTIONED PROPERLY DEX. 2.COURT FEE NOT AFFIXED ON WAKALATNAMA. 15 STM/4203/2017 ADV. MAHESH AMONKAR PIO PURSHOTTAM F. PARAB, CHAIRMAN, ALORNA PANCHAKROSHI HIGH SCHOOL., STATE OF GOA THR. THE CHIEF SECRETARY AND 1.DEX AT SR. NO. 4 NOT PROPER. 2.STATEMENT OF MAJOR/MOR NOT MADE R/O R-2. 3.MARKG ON PG 22.
Page : 4 16 STM/4204/2017 ADV. DEEPAK GAONKAR ADV. KAUSHAL SHETYE MANDAR DKAR KHARKANDE., STATE OF GOA THR. THE CHIEF SECRETARY AND 2 1.DOCUMENT MENTIONED SR. NO. 26 DEX NOT ANNEXED. 2.DATE ON DOCUMENT ANNEXED AT PG 191 DOES NOT TALLY WITH DEX. 3.DEX AT SR. NO. 34 NOT PROPER (APPLICATION NO. MENTIONED WRONG). 4.PG 79, 80, NOT PROPERLY LEGIBLE. 5.MARKGS ON PG 128, 206. 17 STM/4210/2017 ADV. ASHW D. BHOBE MARUTI HALLIKAR AND BABU ESSO NAIK (DEC) THR. LRS AND 1.CERTIFIED COPY OF MEMO OF APPEAL NOT FILED (XEROX COPY ANNEXED). 2.DATE MENTIONED AT SR. NO. 3 OF DEX DOES NOT TALLY WITH DOCUMENTS ANNEXED AT PG NO. 38-44. 3.MARKGS ON PGS 16, 30 TO 33, 39 TO 41. 4.PRESENTATION FORM IS COMPLETE. 18 STM/4211/2017 ADV. FONSECA CLAYTON ANTHONY GAJANAN D. PHADTE., YASHODHARA K. BHOSLE (DEC) THR. LRS AND 1.DOCUMENTS NOT ARRANGED PROPERLY. 2.MARKGS ON PGS 48, 59, 82, 87, 39. 3.DOCUMENTS ANNEXED AT PG 86 DOES NOT TALLY WITH DEX. 4.HANDWRITTEN PG 86. 5.NO PROPER MARG ON PG 42, 48, 49. 6.PG 41, 52 NOT PROPERLY LEGIBLE. 7.DEX IS COMPLETE. 8.PAGATION IS NOT PROPER.
Page : 5 19 STM/4212/2017 ADV. FONSECA CLAYTON ANTHONY GAJANAN D. PHADTE., YASHODHARA K. BHOSLE (DEC) THR. LRS AND 1.DOCUMENTS ANNEXED ARE NOT CERTIFIED AS TRUE COPIES. 2.COPY OF ORDER DT. 5/9/17 ANNEXED IS OF CRA 39/15 & NOT OF CRA 40/15 AS MENTIONED PRAYER CLAUSE. 3.PG 82 HANDWRITTEN. 4.DOCUMENTS AT SR NO. 9 & 10 OF DEX NOT ANNEXED. 5.DOCUMENT NOT ARRANGED PROPER ORDER. 6.MARKGS ON PGS. 63, 65, 70-72, 74-75. 7.DATE ON PG 82 DOES NOT TALLY WITH DEX. 8.SYNOPSIS NOT FILED. 9.PAGATION IS NOT PROPER/DOCUMENT ARE NOT ARRANGED AS PER DEX. 20 STM/4214/2017 ADV. SHIVADATTA PRAKASH MUNJ V. P. K. URBAN CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD., REP. BY PUNDALIK RAMA PALYEKAR., TRUPTI SARVESH SAWANT AND 1.PRESENTATION FORM IS COMPLETE. 2.NO PROPER MARG ON PG 25(A), 35, 37-39, 54. 3.PG 54-55 NOT ARRANGED PROPERLY. 4.PGS 65-66 NOT PROPERLY LEGIBLE. 5.EXHIBIT 'C' NOT MARKED. 6.COURT FEE AFFIXED ON CERTIFIED COPY IS SUFFICIENT. 7.COURT FEE AFFIXED ON MEMO OF APPEAL & VAKALATNAMA. 8.COPY IS NOT SERVED. 9.PARA 10 OF THE APPEAL IS NT PROPERLY WORDED. 21 STM/4216/2017 ADV. ROHIT BRAS DE SA ADV. SUMANGALA D KUSHAWAHA ADV. RAI KIRAN ASHOK SNEHA S. TENDOLKAR AND 3 LOKMANYA MULTI PURPOSE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., REP BY ITS AUTH. OFFICER PRAKASH J. SURLAKAR., 1.COPY OF EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 84/13 AS MENTIONED PRAYER CLAUSE (A) NOT ANNEXED.
Page : 6 22 STA/4217/2017 STM/4216/2017 ADV. ROHIT BRAS DE SA ADV. PRITI S. P. DESHPRABHU ADV. SUMANGALA D KUSHAWAHA SNEHA S. TENDOLKAR AND 3 LOKMANYA MULTI PURPOSE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., REP BY ITS AUTH. OFFICER PRAKASH J. SURLAKAR., 1) STATEMENT OF REG. ADD. 2) COPY OF EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 84/13 AS MENTIONED PRAYER CLAUSE (A) NOT ANNEXED. 23 STM/4218/2017 ADV. ROHIT BRAS DE SA ADV. SUMANGALA D KUSHAWAHA ADV. RAI KIRAN ASHOK SUNIL M. TENDOLKAR., LOKMANYA MULTI PURPOSE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., REP BY ITS AUTH. OFFICER PRAKASH J. SURLAKAR., 1.DOCUMENTS AS PER PRAYER CLAUSE (B) NOT ANNEXED. 2.PARA 11 OF APPEAL MEMO IS NOT PROPER. 3.DATE NOT PUT ON WAKALATNAMA. 4.COURT FEE NOT AFFIXED ON CERTIFIED COPIES. 24 STA/4219/2017 STM/4218/2017 ADV. ROHIT BRAS DE SA ADV. SUMANGALA D KUSHAWAHA ADV. RAI KIRAN ASHOK SUNIL M. TENDOLKAR., LOKMANYA MULTI PURPOSE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., REP BY ITS AUTH. OFFICER PRAKASH J. SURLAKAR., 1) STATEMENT OF REG. ADD. 2) COPY OF EXECUTION APPLN NO. 84/13, MENTIONED PRAYER CLAUSE, NOT ANNEXED. 25 STM/4223/2017 ADV. ASHW D. BHOBE ADV. BHOBE SHRADHA SUBHASH GABRIEL JOSEPH FERNANDES., THE SARPANCH/SECRETARY, VILLAGE PANCHAYAT OF CALANGUTE., 1.PG 89 IS NOT CONTUITY WITH PG 88. 2.PAGATION IS NOT PROPER AFTER PG 56. 3.PGS NOT PROPERLY LEGIBLE AT 54 & 66. 4.HANDWRITTEN PG 39. 5.PG 37 NOT ARRANGED PROPERLY. 6.PG 38 IS NOT PROPERLY XEROXED. 26 STM/4226/2017 ADV. R. J. PTO ACCURATE PIPES & FITTGS PVT. LTD. THR. POA VAYAK CHOUDHORI AND 2 THE EDC LIMITED THR. ITS AUTH. OFFICER P. P. BORKAR, DY. GM., 1.CHECKLIST IS NOT SIGNED. 2.APPELLANT HAS NOT SIGNED THE VAKALATNAMA. 3.PAGATION IS COMPLETE. FURTHER OBJECTIONS NOT RAISED. 4.DEX IS COMPLETE. 5.COURT FEE AFFIXED ON APPEAL IS SUFFICIENT.
Page : 7 27 STM/4227/2017 ADV. DEVIDAS J. PANGAM SHAILEJA MADEVA NARVENCAR @ PRACHI PURUSHOTTAM CHANEKAR., REGISTRAR OF BIRTH & DEATH, AND 1.PRESENTATION FORM IS COMPLETE. 2.PG 27-28 NOT ARRANGED PROPERLY. 3.WAKALATNAMA NOT FILED & SIGNED BY ADVOCATE. 4.COURT FEE NOT AFFIXED ON PETITION, AFFIDAVIT & WAKALATNAMA. 28 STM/4229/2017 ADV. PALYEKAR VITA VISHRAM MARIA ERTA TEREZA GOMES E FERNANDES (DEC) REP THR. HEIRS AND 8 M. TECH DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. REP. THR. AUTH. RAJENDRA PRASAD SGLA AND 11 1.APPEAL NO. AT SR. NO. 8 DEX IS MENTIONED WRONG. 2.PG NOS. NOT PUT ON DEX AT SR. NO. 3. 3.MARKGS ON PG 85, 86, 88. 4.COURT FEE STAMP NOT SIGNED. 5.NO PROPER MARG ON PG 227. 6.CAUSE TITLE IS NOT TALLYG. 29 STM/4231/2017 ADV. DEVIDAS J. PANGAM SANTOSH G NAIK., GOA DUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION THR. ITS MANAGG DIRECTOR AND 2 1.AFFIDAVIT IS COMPLETE ALSO VERIFICATION. 2.BLANK ON PG 4. 3.PETITIONERS DETAILS ARE COMPLETE THE CAUSE TITLE. 4.COURT FEE STAMP NOT ANNEXED & NO COURT FEE ON AFFIDAVIT. 5.VAKALATNAMA NOT SIGNED BY ADVOCATE AND NO DATE. 6.HANDWRITTEN PGS 62 & 72. 7.LETTER DT. 29/10/12 MENTIONED AT SR 7 DEX NOT ANNEXED. 8.MARKGS ON PGS 59 & 77. 9.PGS 27-32, 41, 43 & 45 NOT PROPERLY LEGIBLE. 10.DOCUMENTS ANNEXD AT PG 24-26 DOES NOT TALLY WITH DATE MENTIONED DEX. 11.SYNOPSIS NOT FILED. DATE ON.
Page : 8 30 STM/4232/2017 ADV. DEVIDAS J. PANGAM RUTH MADEIRA E. PAI., DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES AND 4 1.COPY IS NOT SERVED. 2.COURT FEE STAMPS NOT AFFIXED. 3.WAKALATNAMA NOT FILED. 4.DEX IS COMPLETE & PAGATION NOT DONE. HENCE, FURTHER OBJECTIONS NOT RAISED. 31 STM/4234/2017 ADV. RYAN DA PIEDADE MENEZES ANA MARIA GUILHERMA CIRA PIEDADE PEREIRA (DEC.) REP. THR. LRS., JOSE AGNELO POLYCARPO MENDONCA AND 2 1.COURT FEE NOT AFFIXED ON PETITION, AFFIDAVIT & WAKALATNAMA. 2.WAKALATNAMA NOT FILED & DATE NOT PUT. 3.DEX IS COMPLETE & PAGATION NOT DONE. HENCE, FURTHER OBJECTIONS NOT RAISED. 32 STM/12/2018 ADV. YOGESH V. NADKARNI GOA SPONGE AND POWER LTD., REP. BY ITS SENIOR GENERAL MANAGER, MANISH GOEL., THE SECRETARY, ELECTRICITY DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF GOA AND 1.COURT FEES NOT AFFIXED ON CERTIFIED COPY. 2.STATEMENT UNDER RULE 2 CHP XXVI OF THE B.H.C.A.S. RULES, 2000 3.STATEMENT OF TRUE COPIES 33 STM/21/2018 ADV. SHIVADATTA PRAKASH MUNJ LAXMI CHOLU PEREIRA., NILESH FALKAR AND 2 1.COURT FEE NOT AFFIXED ON CERTIFIED COPIES & WAKALATNAMA. 34 STA/22/2018 STM/21/2018 ADV. SHIVADATTA PRAKASH MUNJ LAXMI CHOLU PEREIRA., NILESH FALKAR AND 2 1) COURT FEE NOT AFFIXED ON APPLICATION. 2) STATEMENT OF REG. ADD. 35 STM/23/2018 ADV. ALMEIDA COUTHO CLEOFATO GARRETT ADV. SHAILESH REDKAR P.R. NIRMAN (GOA) (P) LTD., REP. BY ITS MANAGG DIRECTOR, ANIL KUMAR GUPTA., WILSON NORONHA AND 13 1.PAGATION IS NOT PROPER AFTER PG 44. HENCE FURTHER OBJECTIONS NOT RAISED. 2.COURT FEE AFFIXED ON CERTIFIED COPIES IS SUFFICIENT. 3.PRESENTATION FORM IS COMPLETE. 4.STATEMENT OF MAJOR/MOR NOT MADE R/O OF R-3 (A) TO (E).
Page : 9 36 STA/24/2018 STM/23/2018 ADV. ALMEIDA COUTHO CLEOFATO GARRETT ADV. SHAILESH REDKAR P.R. NIRMAN (GOA) (P) LTD., REP. BY ITS MANAGG DIRECTOR, ANIL KUMAR GUPTA., WILSON NORONHA AND 13 1) STATEMENT OF TRUE COPIES 2) STATEMENT OF MAJOR/MOR NOT MADE R/O R-3(A) TO (E). 3) STATEMENT OF REG. ADD. 37 STM/28/2018 ADV. RYAN DA PIEDADE MENEZES ADV. GA MARIA ALMEIDA ANA MARIA GUILHERMA (DEC) THR. HER LRS., JOSE AGNELO POLYCARPO MENDONCA (DEC) AND 2 1.DEX IS COMPLETE. 2.WAKALATNAMA NOT FILED. 3.PAGATION IS NOT PROPER/COMPLETE. HENCE, FURTHER OBJ. NOT RAISED. 4.COURT FEE NOT AFFIXED ON AFFIDAVIT. 38 STM/30/2018 ADV. D' CRUZ NOEL PARRAS ROMEO D'COSTA., STATE OF GOA, THR. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR AND 1.STATE AS PER H.C.A.S. RULES IS 2.DEX IS NOT SIGNED BY THE ADVOCATE. 3.CRIMAL SECTION NOT MENTIONED. 4.STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION 5.STATEMENT UNDER RULE W OF CH. XXVI H.C.A.S. RULES 6.COPY IS NOT SERVED. 39 STA/31/2018 STM/30/2018 ADV. D' CRUZ NOEL PARRAS ROMEO D'COSTA., STATE OF GOA, THR. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR AND 1) STATEMENT OF REG. ADD. 2) COPY OF IMPUGNED ORDER NOT FILED. 3) DEX IS NOT SIGNED BY THE ADVOCATE. 40 STM/34/2018 ADV. JOAQUIM GODHO ADV. NADAF RAJASAB MABUSAB ADV. GAONKAR VAMAN SURESH LADU PUNO GAONKAR, THR. LRS. KRISHNANATH LADU GAONKAR (DEC) AND BOMBI YESHWANT SHETKAR AND 35 1.STATEMENT OF TRUE COPIES 2. CAUSE TITLE PETITION WORD SHOULD BE APPLICANT. 3.COURT FEE AFFIXED IS SUFFICIENT. 4.AFFIDAVIT IS NOT FILED. 41 STA/35/2018 STM/34/2018 ADV. JOAQUIM GODHO ADV. NADAF RAJASAB MABUSAB ADV. GAONKAR VAMAN SURESH LADU PUNO GAONKAR, THR. LRS. KRISHNANATH LADU GAONKAR (DEC) AND BOMBI YESHWANT SHETKAR AND 35 1) MA MATTER IS UNDER OFFICE OBJECTIONS.
Page : 10 42 STM/36/2018 ADV. JAT RAMAIYA ADV. KETAKI L. PEDNEKAR ADV. ANIROODH C. SARDESAI HARE RAM SGH., RENATI SRIVASULU AND 1.PG 22 NOT ARRANGED PROPERLY. 2.STATEMENT UNDER RULE 2 CHP XXVI OF H.C.A.S. RULES 3.WAKALATNAMA NOT FILED. 4.SYNOPSIS NOT FILED. 5.COURT FEE AFFIXED ON MEMO OF APPEAL IS SUFFICIENT. 6.STATEMENT AS PER BHCAS RULES IS 7.JUDGEMENT & ORDER DATED 23/10/17 MENTIONED PRAYER CLAUSE (A) IS NOT FOUND. 8.HANDWRITTEN PGS. 28, 29, 35-42. 9.EXHIBIT NOT MARKED. 10.STATEMENT OF TRUE COPIES 43 STA/37/2018 STM/36/2018 ADV. JAT RAMAIYA ADV. KETAKI L. PEDNEKAR ADV. ANIROODH C. SARDESAI HARE RAM SGH., RENATI SRIVASULU AND 1) COPY NOT SERVED 2) COURT FEE NOT AFFIXED ON AFFIDAVIT AND CERTIFIED COPIES 3) DEX NOT FILED, HENCE FURTHER OBJECTIONS NOT RAISED 4) HANDWRITTEN PAGED 7 TO 14 44 STM/38/2018 ADV. M.S. JOSHI ADV. DESAI POOJA SHIRISH RAJENDRA DEVISGH SHEKHAWAT., LEVO AGNELO DIAS AND 3 1.MARKGS ON PGS 40, 52, 57, 58, 64 & 74. 2.PRESENTATION FORM IS COMPLETE. 3.SYNOPSIS NOT SIGNED. 4.EXHIBIT NOT MARKED PROPERLY. 5.PGS. 165, 169, 173, 178, 180, 184, 186 & 188 ARE NOT PROPERLY XEROXED. 6.2 PGS AFTER PG 195 NOT NUMBERED. 7.DATE MENTIONED AT SR. NO. 11 DEX DOES NOT TALLY WITH DOCUMENTS ANNEXED. 8.PAGATION IS NOT PROPER AFTER PG 71. 9.STATEMENT OF TRUE COPIES IS
Page : 11 45 STA/39/2018 STM/38/2018 ADV. M.S. JOSHI ADV. DESAI POOJA SHIRISH RAJENDRA DEVISGH SHEKHAWAT., LEVO AGNELO DIAS AND 3 1) APPLICATION NOT SIGNED BY APPLICANT. 46 STM/46/2018 ADV. ARJUN F. NAIK ADV. MEHANDI ANAY NAIK DESAI ARUNA AROLKAR AND 2 PRACHI AROLKAR @ SHOBA REVODKAR AND 1.HANDWRITTEN PGS 60, 61, 64 & 65. 2.SYNOPSIS/ POTS OF DETERMATION NOT FILED. 3.NO PROPER MARG ON PG 54 & 56. 4.COURT FEE STAMPS NOT AFFIXED. 5.DEX IS COMPLETE. 6.DATE OF IMPUGNED ORDER IS NOT MENTIONED PRAYER CLAUSE. 47 STM/50/2018 ADV. DEEP D. SHIRODKAR THE PROJECT DIRECTOR AND EX-OFFICIO JOT SECRETARY (RD) AND FATIMA GOANSALVER AND 1.APPEAL IS BARRED BY LIMITATION. CONDONATION APPLICATION IS NOT FILED. 2.DEX NOT FILED, HENCE FURTHER OBJECTIONS NOT RAISED. 3.BLANKS ON PG 9. 4.SYNOPSIS NOT FILED. 48 STM/51/2018 ADV. PADGAONKAR CHAITANYA PRAKASH RAMARAO VENKATRAO RANE, REP. THR. CONSTITUTED POA, RANJITSGH JAISGRAO RANE SARDESAI., SANJAY RANE., 1.SYNOPSIS NOT FILED. 2.VALUE OF APPEAL NOT MENTIONED. 3.STATEMENT OF REG. ADD. 4.BLANKS ON PG 6. 5.SUFFICIENT COURT FEES ARE AFFIXED ON MEMO OF APPEAL. 6.STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION 7.COPY OF P.O.A. NOT FILED. 8.PRESENTATION FORM IS COMPLETE. 49 STA/52/2018 STM/51/2018 ADV. PADGAONKAR CHAITANYA PRAKASH RAMARAO VENKATRAO RANE, REP. THR. CONSTITUTED POA, RANJITSGH JAISGRAO RANE SARDESAI., SANJAY RANE., 1) STATEMENT OF REG. ADD.
Page : 12 50 STM/53/2018 ADV. DEEP D. SHIRODKAR THE PROJECT DIRECTOR AND EX-OFFICIO JOT SECRETARY (RD), DISTRICT RURAL DEV. AGENCY AND THOMAS FERNANDES., 1.SYNOPSIS NOT FILED. 2.APPEAL IS BARRED BY LIMITATION. CONDONATION APPLN. IS NOT FILED. 3.BLANKS ON PG 9. 4.DEX NOT FILED, HENCE FURTHER OBJECTIONS NOT RAISED. 51 STM/54/2018 ADV. DEEP D. SHIRODKAR THE PROJECT DIRECTOR AND EX-OFFICIO JOT SECRETARY (RD), DISTRICT RURAL DEV. AGENCY AND MARIA LOURDES FURTADO AND 6 1.APPEAL IS BARRED BY LIMITATION. CONDONATION OF DELAY APPLICATION IS NOT FILED. 2.DEX NOT FILED. FURTHER OBJECTIONS NOT RAISED. 3.SYNOPSIS NOT FILED. 4.COURT FEE STAMPS NOT AFFIXED TO APPEAL. 5.BLANKS ON PG 10. 52 STM/58/2018 ADV. DEEP D. SHIRODKAR THE PROJECT DIRECTOR AND EX-OFFICIO JOT SECRETARY (RD), DISTRICT RURAL DEV. AGENCY AND MARIA FERNANDES., 1.BLANKS ON PG 9. 2.APPEAL IS BARRED BY LIMITATION. CONDONATION APPLN. IS NOT FILED. 3.SYNOPSIS IS NOT FILED. 4.DEX NOT FILED, HENCE FURTHER OBJECTIONS NOT RAISED. 53 STM/60/2018 ADV. JOAQUIM GODHO ADV. NADAF RAJASAB MABUSAB ADV. GAONKAR VAMAN SURESH MAXWELL DIAS @ MEHMOOD MIRZA., GOVT. OF GOA, REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY AND 2 1.PRESENTATION FORM IS COMPLETE. 2.STATEMENT OF TRUE COPIES 3.HANDWRITTEN PG 13. 4.COURT FEE NOT AFFIXED ON AFFIDAVIT. 5.PAGATION NOT TALLYG WITH DEX. 6.COPY IS NOT SERVED. 54 STM/61/2018 ADV. PADGAONKAR CHAITANYA PRAKASH RAMARAO VENKATRAO RANE, REP. THR. CONSTITUTED POA, RANJITSGH JAISGRAO RANE SARDESAI., GOPAL BABUSO NARVEKAR AND 1.PRESENTATION FORM IS COMPLETE. 2.STATEMENT OF REG. ADD. 3.CERTIFIED COPY OF APPEAL MEMO NOT FILED. 4.CERTIFIED COPY OF JMT/DECREE OF TRIAL COURT NOT FILED. 5.DATE ON DEX & MEMO OF APPEAL IS NOT PROPER. 6.COPY OF PLAT & WRITTEN STATEMENT NOT FILED. 7.SYNOPSIS NOT FILED.
Page : 13 55 STA/62/2018 STM/61/2018 ADV. PADGAONKAR CHAITANYA PRAKASH RAMARAO VENKATRAO RANE, REP. THR. CONSTITUTED POA, RANJITSGH JAISGRAO RANE SARDESAI., GOPAL BABUSO NARVEKAR AND 1) STATEMENT OF REG. ADD. 2) CAUSE TITLE APPELLANT WORD SHOULD BE APPLICANT. 56 STA/66/2018 STM/65/2018 ADV. PADGAONKAR CHAITANYA PRAKASH RAMARAO VENKATRAO RANE., SUKHANAD SITARAM GAONKAR AND 1) STATEMENT OF REG. ADD. 2) CAUSE TITLE, APPELLANT WORD SHOULD BE APPLICANT. 57 STM/84/2018 ADV. AMIRA ABDUL RAZAQ THE COMMISSIONER OF COME TAX, PANAJI., BEIERSDORF DIA PVT. LTD., 1.NAME OF REPRESENTATIVE OF RESPONDENT NOT GIVEN. 2.CERTIFIED COPY OF IMPUGNED ORDER NOT ANNEXED. (XEROX COPY FILED). 3.COURT FEE NOT AFFIXED TO APPEAL MEMO. 4.PARA 8 IS BLANK, HENCE FURTHER OBJECTIONS REGARDG LIMITATION CANNOT BE RAISED. 5.DT. MENTIONED AT SR NO. 5 DEX DOES NOT TALLY WITH DOCUMENT ANNEXED. 6.MEMO OF APPEAL & VERIFICATION NOT SIGNED & AFFIDAVIT SWEARG NOT DONE. 58 STM/85/2018 ADV. DEEP D. SHIRODKAR THE PROJECT DIRECTOR AND EX-OFFICIO JOT SECRETARY (RD) AND LUISA JOAO (DEC) THR. LRS. AND 1.VALUE OF APPEAL NOT MENTIONED. 2.DEX NOT FILED, HENCE FURTHER OBJECTIONS NOT RAISED. 3.COURT FEE STAMP NOT AFFIXED TO MEMO OF APPEAL. 4.APPEAL IS BARRED BY LIMITATION. CONDONATION APPLICATION IS NOT FILED. 5.BLANKS ON PG 9.
Page : 14 59 STM/86/2018 ADV. DEEP D. SHIRODKAR THE PROJECT DIRECTOR AND EX-OFFICIO JOT SECRETARY (RD) AND MARIZHO BRAGANCE @ MARIA V. BRAGANCE., 1.COURT FEE STAMPS NOT AFFIXED TO APPEAL MEMO. 2.VALUE OF APPEAL NOT MENTIONED. 3.DEX NOT FILED, HENCE FURTHER OBJECTIONS NOT RAISED. 4.APPEAL IS BARRED BY LIMITATION. CONDONATION APPLICATION IS NOT FILED. 60 STM/87/2018 ADV. DEEP D. SHIRODKAR THE PROJECT DIRECTOR AND EX-OFFICIO JOT SECRETARY (RD) AND CRUZ PEREIRA AND 3 1.APPEAL IS BARRED BY LIMITATION. CONDONATION APPLICATION IS NOT FILED. 2.DEX NOT FILED, HENCE FURTHER OBJECTIONS NOT RAISED. 3.VALUE OF APPEAL NOT MENTIONED. 4.COURT FEE STAMPS NOT AFFIXED TO APPEAL MEMO. 5.STATEMENT OF MAJOR/MOR 61 STM/94/2018 ADV. MAHESH AMONKAR STATE OF GOA, THR. CURCHOREM POLICE STATION, CURCHOREM., TUKARAM KRISHNA NAIK., 1.COURT FEE AFFIXED TO MEMO OF APPEAL IS SUFFICIENT. 2.STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION 3.MARKGS ON PGS. 27, 29, 31 & 33. 4.COURT FEE NOT AFFIXED ON AFFIDAVIT. 5.APPEAL IS BARRED BY LIMITATION. CONDONATION APPLICATION IS NOT FILED. 6.LEAVE TO APPEAL IS NOT FILED. 62 STA/256/2018 STM/1878/2017 ADV. SHAILESH REDKAR KRANTI GUDHO., SOCCORA FERNANDES AND 1) AFFIDAVIT NOT FILED. 2) COPY NOT SERVED. 3) CAUSE TITLE, APPELLANT WORD SHOULD BE APPLICANT. 63 STA/275/2018 PILWP/20/2007 ADV. PAVITHRAN A.V ADVAIT MUDRAS, THR. HIS GAURDIAN AND AJIT ROY AND 3 1) COPY NOT SERVED. 2) PRESENTATION FORM IS COMPLETE. 3) PAGATION IS NOT PROPER, HENCE FURTHER OBJECTIONS NOT RAISED.
Page : 15 64 STA/281/2018 WP/920/2017 ADV. MAHESH AMONKAR CHIDAMBAR R. CHANEKAR., MARGAO MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, BY ITS CHIEF OFFICER, MARGAO., 1) COPY NOT SERVED. 65 STA/297/2018 WP/573/2014 PERSON NETAJIRAO SANJAY PRABHUDESSAI THE STATE OF GOA THR. CHIEF SECRETARY AND 3 1) COPY NOT SERVED. 2) CAUSE TITLE PETITIONER WORD SHOULD BE APPLICANT. 66 STA/303/2018 WP/623/2012 ADV. JAGANNATH JAYANT MULGAONKAR JAIRAM KRISHNANATH KAMAT AND 2 SHEKHAR VASSUDEV VERLEKAR (SCE DEC.) REP. BY LR'S 1) CAUSE TITLE IS NOT PROPER. 67 STA/308/2018 WP/64/2011 ADV. ROHIT BRAS DE SA ADV. PRITI S. P. DESHPRABHU ADV. SUMANGALA D KUSHAWAHA RASIKLAL MOHANLAL GANGANI AND MAMLATDAR OF TISWADI TALUKA AND 1) STATEMENT OF REG. ADD. 2) CAUSE TITLE PETITIONERS WORD SHOULD BE APPLICANTS. 3) DEX IS COMPLETE. 4) PAGATION NOT DONE. 68 STA/315/2018 FA/10/2016 ADV. SHAILESH REDKAR FATIMA MALIK SHAIKH AND 7 THE NEW DIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. 1) COPY NOT SERVED. 2) CAUSE TITLE IS COMPLETE. 69 STA/332/2018 FA/75/2015 ADV. R. G. RAMANI DANATH R.S. USGAONKAR (SCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS. AND 6 ANANT S.S. USGAONKAR (SCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS. AND 32 1) STATEMENT OF TRUE COPY 70 STA/349/2018 FA/134/2017 ADV. RAVI GAWAS CHIKA GAUDE AND SARASWATI MADHAV DESAI AND 4 1) COPY NOT SERVED. 2) PAGE NOS. NOT PUT DEX. 3) DOCUMENT MENTIONED AT SR. NO. 2 DEX NOT ANNEXED.
Page : 16 71 STA/350/2018 WP/602/2015 ADV. RAVI GAWAS RAHAMTULLA AGHA, THROUGH ATTORNEY MR. SHAIKH ABDUL RAUF. RANGARAO ARJUN TONDLE AND 2 1) COPY NOT SERVED. 2) PAGATION NOT DONE. 3) PAGE NOS. NOT PUT DEX. 4) DOCUMENTS MENTIONED AT SR NO. 2 & 3 DEX, NOT ANNEXED. 72 STA/351/2018 WP/57/2018 ADV. VALLABH D. PANGAM SHRIKANT S. VENGURLEKAR., VIRNODA EDUCATION SOCIETY'S, VIKAS HIGH SCHOOL, THR. ITS CHAIRMAN AND 2 1) STATEMENT OF REGISTERED ADDRESSES NOT MADE 2) CAUSE TITLE PETITIONER WORD SHOULD BE APPLICANT 3) DOCUMENT MARKED AS EXH. N AFTER PG. 3 NOT NUMBERED 73 STA/352/2018 AO/75/2016 ADV. ROHIT BRAS DE SA ADV. PRITI S. P. DESHPRABHU ADV. SUMANGALA D KUSHAWAHA NAA PATEL., NURALLAH KAMRUDD VELJEE AND 2 1) CAUSE TITLE APPELLANT WORD SHOULD BE APPLICANT 2) STATEMENT OF REGISTERED ADDRESSES NOT MADE 74 STA/357/2018 FA/77/2017 PERSON BASILIO SANTANA CASTELO @ B.S. CASTELO., STATE OF GOA, THR. THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF GOA AND 15 1) COPY NOT SERVED 2) STATEMENT OF MAJOR/MOR NOT MADE RESPECT OF RESP. NOS. 6 TO 16 75 STA/360/2018 MCA/849/2017 ADV. PURUSHOTTAM R. KARPE ADV. SARVESH P. NAIK SURAJ RAMESH BETKIKAR., MANJILA SANTOSH VERNEKAR AND 27 1) CAUSE TITLE PETITIONER WORD SHOULD BE APPLICANT 2) STATEMENT OF MAJOR/MOR NOT MADE RESPECT OF RESP. NO. 3, 6, 8, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 20, 23 AND 24 76 STA/363/2018 WP/902/2015 ADV. ROHIT BRAS DE SA ADV. PRITI S. P. DESHPRABHU ADV. SUMANGALA D KUSHAWAHA SUPERNOVA ASSOCIATES THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED PARTNER, PRIYESH NAIK., N. SUNITHA AND 7 1) COPY NOT SERVED 2) NAME OF REP. AND ADDRESS OF RESP. NO. 8 NOT GIVED 3) CAUSE TITLE PETITIONER WORD SHOULD BE APPLICANT 77 STA/366/2018 WP/1047/2017 ADV. GALILEO FRANCISCO TELES CAETANA SOUZA AND 2 PAULA RODRIGUES AND 4 1) PRESENTATION FORM IS COMPLETE 2) COPY NOT SERVED 3) HANDWRITTEN PAGE 9 4) NO PROPER MARG ON PGS. 11 AND 12
Page : 17 78 STM/372/2018 ADV. ARUN DE SA MILAN VISHNU AROSKAR AND 2 STATE OF GOA, THR. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR AND 1) COURT FEE NOT AFFIXED ON AFFIDAVITS 2) DATE NOT PUT ON WAKALATNAMA 3) CAUSE TITLE, PETITIONER WORD SHOULD BE APPLICANTS 4) STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION NOT MADE 5) BAIL APPLICATION NOT SIGNED BY APPLICANTS 6) STATEMENT OF TRUE COPIES NOT MADE 7) PG. 26-29 HANDWRITTEN 8) PG. 27 NOT ARRANGED PROPERLY 9) EXHIBITS NOT MARKED 10) PG. 33-36 NOT PROPERLY LEGIBLE 11) PGS. 62-70 NOT MENTIONED DEX 79 STM/373/2018 ADV. ARUN DE SA SOMOLIBAI AROSKAR., STATE OF GOA, THR. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR AND 1) COURT FEE NOT AFFIXED ON AFFIDAVIT 2) DATE NOT PUT ON WAKALATNAMA 3) STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION NOT MADE 4) STATEMENT OF TRUE COPIES NOT MADE 5) PGS. 24-27 HANDWRITTEN 6) PG. 25 NOT ARRANGED PROPERLY 7) EXHIBITS NOT MARKED 8) PGS. 31-34 NOT PROPERLY LEGIBLE 9) PGS. NOS. AT SR. NO. 14 DEX NOT PUT PROPERLY 10) PGS. 60-68 NOT MENTIONED DEX 11) CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER DTD. 12/12018 NOT FILED (XEROX COPIES ANNEXED) 80 STA/374/2018 WP/1037/2017 ADV. DEVIDAS J. PANGAM ADV. PARIKSHIT S. SAWANT MAHALSA SERVICES, THR. PRADEEP P. SHET., STATE OF GOA, THR. ITS CHIEF SECRETARY AND 1) COPY NOT SERVED.
Page : 18 81 STA/377/2018 WP/250/2012 ADV. VALMIKI MENEZES MANUEL PEREIRA., MARIA LETICIA FRANCISCA LUDOMIRA RODRIGUES (DEC) REP. BY ANA S. RODRIGUES AND 7 1) DEX IS COMPLETE. 2) COPY OF DEATH CERTIFICATE NOT FILED. 82 STA/379/2018 WP/416/2009 ADV. SHIVADATTA PRAKASH MUNJ AGNELO FERNANDES FOMENTO CORP. REPRESENTED BY DILIP TIMBLO 1) COPY NOT SERVED. 2) STATEMENT OF REG. ADD. 83 STM/382/2018 ADV. YADNYESH KOTKAR ARUN BABU SIGATA., STATE, AS REP. OFFICER CHARGE, ANC POLICE STATION, MAPUSA AND 1) COPY NOT SERVED. 2) PRESENTATION FORM IS COMPLETE. 3) COURT FEE NOT AFFIXED ON APPLICATION. 4) CAUSE TITLE IS COMPLETE R/O APPLICANT. 5) STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION 6) STATEMENT OF ANNEXURE 7) COURT FEE NOT AFFIXED ON CERTIFIED COPY. 84 STA/383/2018 STM/3037/2017 ADV. FONSECA CLAYTON ANTHONY THE ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL SURANCE CO. LTD., THR. ITS MANAGER, K.G. JITH KUMAR., SANGITA BAPU KHARWAT AND 3 1) COPY NOT SERVED. 85 STA/384/2018 FA/10/2009 ADV. FONSECA CLAYTON ANTHONY FRANCISCO XAVIER FERNANDES AND 2 DOMNIC LUIS AND 3 1) NO PROPER MARG FROM PG 20-30, 33-43, 46, 47. 2) STATEMENT OF TRUE COPIES 86 STA/385/2018 WP/721/2017 ADV. VIVEK ANGELO RODRIGUES ADV. NAIK VITHAL SHIVANAND TOME CARVALHO., STATE OF GOA, THR. THE CHIEF SECRETARY AND 8 1) CAUSE TITLE, PETITIONER WORD SHOULD BE APPLICANT. 2) STATEMENT OF TRUE COPY Section Officer High Court of Bombay at Goa Causelists generated by NIC-GHC on 02-02-2018