Information for File # SEW

Similar documents
Information for File #MVP MVM

Information for File # MVP LSP

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 8 - LAC QUI PARLE COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH NO. 7 OVER THE SNAKE RIVER DISTRICT 1 - PINE COUNTY

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT

Weymouth - Abington Route 18 Widening and Reconstruction Project File No

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 8 - LAC QUI PARLE COUNTY

JAP Additional Information Sheet

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH NO. 101 OVER THE MINNESOTA RIVER DISTRICT 8 - REDWOOD COUNTY

Technical Report Culvert A Hydraulic Analysis

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 1 PINE COUNTY

CE 535, Spring 2002 Preliminary Design Example 1 / 6

Bridge Design Preliminary Bridge Design Example 1 / 6 Spring 2012 updated 1/27/2012

US Route 24 Eastbound (Quincy Memorial Bridge) Over the Mississippi River

Public Notice. Corps File No. LRE Date: March 19, 2017 Expires: March 18, 2022

USING A LABYRINTH WEIR TO INCREASE HYDRAULIC CAPACITY. Dustin Mortensen, P.E. 1 Jake Eckersley, P.E. 1

2016 UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT. 81(ENCHANTED LANE) over CHANNEL. Date of Inspection: Equipment Used: 09/07/2016

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO OVER THE STRAIGHT RIVER DISTRICT 6 - RICE COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 4 - OTTER TAIL COUNTY

Non-Motorized Overpass at SR 5/US1

DESIGN MEMORANDUM WITH DESIGN EXCEPTIONS SP SP

Public Notice U.S. Army Corps In Reply to Application Number CENAB-OP-RMS (NATIONAL HARBOR (FORMERLY PORT Baltimore District AMERICA])

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 4 - OTTER TAIL COUNTY

Preliminary Engineering Study

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO B WABASHA STREET SOUTH BOUND (MASA 235 SB)

FINAL Caples Lake Fisheries Management Plan. Version 4.0

Design Criteria. Design Criteria

ADDENDA B Hydrologic and Hydraulic (H&H) Study Guidance 2019

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH NO. 9 OVER THE BLUE EARTH RIVER DISTRICT 7 - BLUE EARTH COUNTY

30 DAY PUBLIC NOTICE MAINTENANCE DREDGING OF THE 8-FOOT CHANNEL OF THE FEDERAL NAVIGATION PROJECT IN KENNEBUNK RIVER KENNEBUNK & KENNEBUNKPORT, ME

FY 2006 TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL PROGRAM

Chapter 11. Culverts and Bridges Design Checklist for Culvert Design

Paul Huston, P.E., Design-Build Coordinator Chuck Gonderinger, HDR Engineering. Minnesota Department of Transportation (the Department)

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO MSAS 123 (2 ND AVE. SW) OVER THE CANNON RIVER CITY OF FARIBAULT, RICE COUNTY

New two-lane bridge to replace the existing structure spanning the Maple River just south of the Village s central business district

Gordon Proctor Director Policy on Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel on ODOT Owned or Maintained Facilities

Ketchikan Harbors Thomas Basin and Bar Point Harbor

FINAL Albertville Business Park AUAR Update Traffic Study

VWP CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION REPORT. Project Name: Berkmar Drive Extension Locality: Albemarle County Inspector: ERM

Living Streets Policy

DRAFT TRAFFIC STUDY BOULDER AVENUE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT CITY OF HIGHLAND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Nome Harbor Page 2 of 12

INDIANA REGIONAL GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR THE STATE OF INDIANA

2016 UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT. CR 52 over CALDWELL BROOK. Date of Inspection: Equipment Used: 06/04/2016. County Highway Agency

SPO Regional Challenge Grant Creation of a Sea Level Adaption Working Group for Biddeford, Saco, OOB and Scarborough J.T. Lockman, AICP, Planning

Public Information Meeting. Orange Camp Road. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Beltway to I-4. Presented by: Volusia County August 2, 2018

Annex E Bridge Pier Protection Plan

ST. LOUIS SECTION PROJECT OF THE YEAR AWARD

CFH Boise City Parks and Recreation

11 CHECKLISTS Master Checklists All Stages CHECKLIST 1 FEASIBILITY STAGE AUDIT

West Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road

RLRC COMMUNITIES EAST GRAND FORKS AREA CHARACTER THE RED LAKE RIVER & THE RED RIVER OF THE NORTH CONFLUENCE EAGLE POINT BOAT LAUNCH DESIGN

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District

APPLICANT: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Attention: Mr. Charles Brandt 1529 West Sequim Bay Road Sequim, Washington 98382

(Revised February,2005) CULVERTS, BRIDGES, AND FORDS

City of Roseville Section 13 Design Standards. _Bikeways January 2016 SECTION 13 BIKEWAYS

APPENDIX L: COST ESTIMATING TOOLS

2016 UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT. CSAH 10 over POMME DE TERRE RIVER. Date of Inspection: Equipment Used: 06/18/2016. County Highway Agency

Appendix I. Catalytic Infrastructure Opinions of Probable Cost

APPENDIX J HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY

Klickitat County Shoreline Master Program Update. Open House March 15, 2017

Programmatic Categorical Exclusion Update Question & Answers

Appendix J: Q1-Highway 35 Route Construction Plan

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

APPENDIX D REAL ESTATE PLAN

Water Resources Report RKLD Annual Meeting July 30, 2016

Roads that are intended to be included in the VDOT system of maintained roadways must meet the standards and specifications prescribed by the VDOT.

DRAFT. October 17, 2014 File No Mr. Brendhan Zubricki Town Administrator Essex Town Hall 30 Martin Street Essex, MA.

FEASIBILITY REPORT STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TERRACE AND METCALF CITY OF OVERLAND PARK JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS

section 4 Existing Conditions, Issues, and Options

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT METRO DISTRICT - ANOKA COUNTY

WELCOME PTH 59N - PTH 101 INTERCHANGE FUNCTIONAL DESIGN STUDY PUBLIC INFORMATION SESSION MONDAY, JUNE 13, :00 P.M. - 8:00 P.M.

Traffic Assessment for Woodhaven Redevelopment. City of Rome Oneida County, New York. March 2, 2018

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. NHS Arterial (Non-Interstate)

1-22. KETCHIKAN, ALASKA (Thomas and Bar Point Basins) (CWIS NOS & 87071) Condition of Improvement 30 September 2007

Earthen Embankments. turning into larger, more costly repairs. The following. The State Dam Safety Program has inspection

SALINITY AND DISSOLVED OXYGEN IN THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER GULF OUTLET NAVIGATION CHANNEL AND IN ADJACENT SURFACE WATERS,

City of Hanover TRANSPORTATION STUDY

PROJECT NO. 093 MA 199 H C. FEDERAL NO. xxxx WIKIEUP-WICKENBURG-PHOENIX HIGHWAY TEGNER STREET, ALTERNATIVE 10 PROJECT IMPROVEMENT

Intersection Traffic Control Feasibility Study

City of Madison, East Johnson Street North Baldwin Street to First Street Local Street Dane County

Gerald P. Oliveto, P.E. George Franz NJDOT

SUNRAY DRIVE/PERRINE RANCH ROAD FROM WEST OF DARLINGTON ROAD TO GRAND BOULEVARD AND PERRINE RANCH ROAD AT SEVEN SPRINGS BOULEVARD

3.7 River Navigation Affected Environment

MnDOT. City of Zumbrota. Goodhue County

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. Non-NHS State Highways

APPENDIX C VEGETATED EMERGENCY SPILLWAY. VERSION 1.0 March 1, 2011

East Main Street Bypass Project Preliminary Design Report

PLACEMENT OF SIGNS RECOMMENDED PRACTICES SUB-SECTION

City of Madison, East Johnson Street North Baldwin Street to First Street Local Street Dane County

INNER LOOP EAST. AIA Rochester Annual Meeting November 13, 2013 TRANSFORMATION PROJECT. Bret Garwood, NBD Erik Frisch, DES

The Woods at Rush Creek - PUD Concept & Dvlpt Stage Plan Review

BPP / SUB

Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies. Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004

LARIMER COUNTY: ENGINEERING DOUGLAS ROAD (CR 54)

Union Pacific Railroad

St. Francis Drive through the City of Santa Fe Corridor Study

Hard Hat Services ph: hardhatinc.com 932 N. Wright St., Suite 160 Naperville, IL 60563

APPENDIX G: INTERSECTION NEEDS AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD

Attached for your reference please find project updates on ongoing VDOT construction projects in Southampton County.

Transcription:

Information for File #2014-02744-SEW Applicant: Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), District 3; c/o Mr. Robert Nibbe Corps Contact: Sarah Wingert, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 180 5 th Street East, Suite 700, St. Paul, MN, 55101-1678; 651-290-5358; sarah.e.wingert@usace.army.mil Primary County: Sherburne and Wright Counties Location: Sections 23 and 35, Township 123N., Range 30W. at Clearwater, Minnesota Information Complete On: February 20, 2015 Posting Expires On: March 5, 2015 Authorization Type: Section 404 Clean Water Act via LOP-5-MN This application is being reviewed in accordance with the practices for documenting Corps jurisdiction under Sections 9 & 10 of the Rivers and Harbor Act of 1899 and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act identified in Regulatory Guidance Letter 07-01. We have made a preliminary determination that the aquatic resources that would be impacted by the proposed project are regulated by the Corps of Engineers under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Our jurisdictional review and final jurisdictional determination could result in modifications to the scope of the project s regulated waterbody/wetland impacts and compensatory mitigation requirements identified above. PROJECT INVOLVES: 1) Threatened or Endangered Species: The project is not expected to affect any species listed as threatened or endangered under the federal Endangered Species Act. The Blandings turtle, a state-listed threatened species, may be located within the project limits. MnDOT would follow Minnesota Department of Natural Resources guidelines to avoid and minimize impacts to the Blandings turtle. 2) FEMA 100-Year Floodplain: The project crosses approximately 1,150 feet of the Mississippi River s 100-year floodplain (see map number 27141C0195F). The new bridge would include four piers in the river, and two piers on land in the floodplain. The bridge would be approximately 28 feet above the 100-year flood elevation, and the new bridge piers would line up with the existing bridge piers. No impacts to adjacent wetlands would occur. The project would not have a significant increase in flood level headwater or tailwater elevations, and no significant increased risk of flooding would result from the project. The project would not result in new access to the floodplain from TH 24. Thus, MnDOT determined the project would not have significant impacts on the floodplain. 3) A Listed State-Impaired Water: The project crosses a section of the Mississippi River (ID number 07010203-510) that is listed on the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency s 2012 303(d) list as impaired for aquatic consumption by mercury in fish tissue. This section of the river is also impaired for aquatic life for fishes biosassessments and for aquatic recreation by fecal coliform. About 0.4 mile upstream of the project, the Clearwater River enters the Mississippi River. This section of the Clearwater River is listed as impaired for aquatic life by fishes bioassessments and dissolved oxygen levels. 1

4) Linear Project: The project would occur on approximately 0.96 mile of TH 24 from approximately 200 feet northeast of CSAH 75 to approximately 2,800 feet northeast of the existing TH 24 bridge over the Mississippi River (Bridge 6557). PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE: MnDOT proposes to discharge dredged and fill material in approximately 131 linear feet (0.55 acre) of the Mississippi River in conjunction with the replacement of the TH 24 bridge (Bridge 6557) over the Mississippi River on the east side of Clearwater. The bridge is considered structurally deficient due to structural and geometric concerns, and it has an overall sufficiency rating of 56 out of 100. MnDOT s policy is to replace bridges with sufficiency ratings of less than 70. Recent inspections reveal that the bridge deck and superstructure have moderate deterioration, and the substructure has minor to moderate deterioration. The existing concrete nine-span bridge was built in 1958, is approximately 1,143 feet long and 38.3 feet wide. The bridge supports two 12-foot wide travel lanes with 3-foot wide shoulders and a 3-foot wide walkway on the side of either shoulder. The width of the bridge s shoulders and walkways do not meet current state design and safety standards. In the project area, TH 24 is a two-lane principal arterial with a current ADT of about 15,600 vehicles per day, and a projected 2035 ADT of 17,300. The road approaches on either side of the bridge consist of two 12-foot wide lanes with 10-foot wide shoulders. Bridge 6557 would be replaced with a new 1,175-foot long, 60.42-foot wide multi-span concrete beam bridge (Bridge 71004) that consists of seven spans and six piers, including four piers constructed in the Mississippi River bed. The bridge would be constructed immediately downstream of the existing bridge, and the new bridge piers would be placed to line up with the existing piers. The new bridge would carry two 12-foot wide travel lanes with 10-foot wide shoulders and a 12-foot wide, barrier-separated multi-use recreational trail on the downstream side of the bridge. The trail would connect to the Mississippi River Trail on the west side of the river and to the 10-foot shoulder on the south side of TH 24 on the east side of the river. Riprap would be placed along 81 linear feet of both river banks to protect the bridge abutments from scour. The road approaches would need to be slightly re-aligned to accommodate the new bridge location. Approximately 0.22 mile of the road approach on the west side of the bridge and approximately 0.54 mile of the road approach on the east side of the bridge would be reconstructed. The approaches would include two 12-foot wide travel lanes with 10-foot wide shoulders. Left turn lanes would be added at intersections with 106 th Street, Walnut Street South, and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources public boat access. A stormwater pond would be constructed in an upland area located in the southeast quadrant of the bridge to treat water from the road approaches and a portion of the bridge deck. The new bridge would be constructed from the water using a barge, cranes, and other equipment. Traffic would continue on the existing bridge as the new bridge is being constructed. The old bridge would be demolished once the existing bridge is completed. MnDOT would conduct a survey of the river bottom prior to beginning the project so the preconstruction contours and elevations of the river bed could be re-established upon project completion. After the bridge replacement work was completed, all temporary fills and temporary structures would be removed from the river. MnDOT would use soundings or an underwater camera to ensure that all temporary fill and debris from the bridge demolition would be removed from the river upon project completion. NAME, AREA AND TYPES OF WATERS (INCLUDING WETLANDS) SUBJECT TO LOSS: As proposed, the project would result in a total of 0.55 acre of impacts to the Mississippi River, including 0.084 acre of permanent impacts and 0.47 acre of temporary impacts. See the attached Tables 1 and 2 for specific impact information. The project would not impact any wetlands in the project. 2

Permanent impacts would occur due to the placement of riprap along 81 linear feet of both river banks for scour protection, and due to the installation of four bridge piers in the river bed. Each pier would consist of two octagon-shaped stems that occupy 62 square feet and are 14 feet long. Permanent impacts to the river would also occur for the placement of 64 square feet of riprap at the outlet of the proposed stormwater pond in the southeast quadrant of the bridge crossing, and for the placement of 46 square feet of riprap at the outlet of a storm drain on the southwest quadrant of the river crossing. Temporary impacts would occur for the construction of a temporary causeway, a temporary barge dock, and temporary cofferdams. The causeway would be used to provide a dry surface for equipment access, and would be built out to Pier 5. The causeway would be constructed from the west bank of the river, and would consist of clean riprap. It would be 498 feet long and 30 feet wide, and would include three 8-foot long, 21-foot wide fingers that would extend to Piers 3, 4, and 5, affecting 0.35 acre of the river bed. Cofferdams would be used to construct the four piers in the river. The cofferdams would surround the footing for each pier, and would be 46 feet long by 21 feet wide. The cofferdams and footings would result in a 0.02 acre temporary impact at each pier in the river. Upon completion of the pier installation, the footings would be beneath the river bed, the cofferdams would be removed, and the affected area would be restored to match the surrounding, un-impacted river bottom elevations and contours. Finally, a temporary 58-foot long, 30-foot wide barge dock consisting of clean riprap would be constructed from the east bank of the river to allow access to the barge needed for bridge construction. MnDOT estimates the causeway and barge dock would be in place for up to 730 days, while the cofferdams would be in place for up to 180 days. COMPENSATORY MITIGATION: The applicant did not propose compensatory mitigation for the permanent and temporary impacts to the Mississippi River associated with the construction of the new TH 24 bridge. DRAWINGS: See attached figures labeled 2014-02744-SEW, Tables 1-2 of 2, and Figures 1-5of 5. 3

2014-02744-SEW, Table 1 of 2: Permanent Mississippi River Impacts Permanent Fills Size of Impact Size of Impact (acre (linear feet) or square feet) Riprap - west bank 81 0.04 ac Riprap - east bank 81* 0.03 ac Bridge Piers ( Piers 3, 4, 5, and 6) 28* 496 sf Riprap - storm drain outlet 10 46 sf Riprap - stormwater pond outlet 10 64 sf TOTAL 101 linear feet 0.084 acre *this impact is the same on opposite sides of the river, so the linear footage is not included twice in the total **the 28 linear-foot impact is within the same length that would be affected by the permanent riprap, so is not included in the total. Each pier would affect 28 linear feet of the river. 2014-02744-SEW, Table 2 of 2: Temporary Mississippi River Impacts Temporary Fills Impact (linear (acre or square Impact feet) feet) (days) Rock causeway 38* 0.35 730 days Barge dock 30** 0.04 730 days Cofferdams to construct pier footings (Piers 3, 4, 5, and 6) 46*** 0.08 180 days TOTAL 30 0.47 n/a *8 feet of this impact is within the same length that would be impacted by the permanent riprap, so 8 feet is not included in the total **this impact would occur along the same additional 30 feet of the river that would be impacted by the causeway (though on the opposite side of the river), so it is not counted twice ***the 46 linear-foot impact is within the same length that would be affected by the permanent riprap, so is not included in the total. Each cofferdam would affect 46 linear feet of the river.

Project Location 2014-02744-SEW, Figure 1 of 5: Project Location

2014-02744-SEW, Figure 2 of 5: Proposed Permanent Impact Locations

2014-02744-SEW, Figure 3 of 5: Proposed Permanent Impact Locations

2014-02744-SEW, Figure 4 of 5: Project Layout

2014-02744-SEW, Figure 5 of 5: Project Location