Waupaca Chain O' Lakes Anonymous Stakeholder Survey Surveys Distributed: 804 Surveys Returned: 432 Response Rate: 54% Chain Property

Similar documents
Aquatic Invasive Species in Douglas County Waterways

KEY. Drought: On a scale of 1 5 with more icons meaning the. species has a high growth rate.

MEMORANDUM Comfort Lake-Forest Lake Watershed District

Lake Winnibigoshish Fisheries Information Newsletter

Aquatic Exotics In Wisconsin

Leech Lake Update 5/20/2009 Walker Area Fisheries Office State Hwy. 371 NW Walker, MN

Missouri Non Native Aquatic Species and Watercraft Survey, October 2009

Fisheries and Oceans Canada Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS) Funding Update. Becky Cudmore, AIS Program Fisheries and Oceans Canada

Current Status and Management Recommendations for the Fishery in the Cloverleaf Chain of Lakes

CORRESPONDENCE/MEMORANDUM

Activity Title: Don t Stop for Hitchhikers

Ebert Lake 8 Lime Lake - 13

Beaver Creek Reserve Meets Success In 6-County AIS Prevention Effort. Anna Mares Beaver Creek Reserve April 13 th, 2011

Summary of and Initial Response to public comments on MN Department of Natural Resources proposal to manage new waters for Muskellunge

SECTION #1. What is Watercraft Inspection?

Aquatic Plant Management and Importance to Sport Fisheries

Hazardous Paths to the Columbia Gorge

Preventing Aquatic Invasive Species

6/23/2010. Characteristics of Invasive Species

Citizen Lake Monitoring Network. Lakes Convention April 2011 Laura Herman Brenda Nordin Jay Schiefelbein

the Preventing invasive species from spreading to Minnesota lakes is a top priority for the DNR and every Minnesotan. By Mary Hoff

To help protect Becker County s lakes and rivers, please keep these points in mind before transporting watercraft.

Healthy lakes add value to our communities. They provide a place to relax and recreate,

Impacts of Aquatic Invasive Species on the Lake Superior Fishery. by Jeff Gunderson Minnesota Sea Grant Program

Long Lake Link. Spring 2011 Newsletter. Long Lake Property Owners Association. Think spring this little guy is!

Eurasian Water-milfoil

Clean Boats, Clean Waters. Watercraft Inspection Program

Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS) Aquatic Plant Management (APM)

2018 Lake Shamineau Property Owners Demographics Survey Results Report

Quemahoning Reservoir

AIS Review Bayfield County

Fish Community and Aquatic Ecosystem Responses to the Cessation of Eurasian Watermilfoil Chemical Treatment on Lake Ellwood, Wisconsin

BIG TWIN LAKE Kalkaska County (T28N, R05W, Section 18, and T28N, R06W, Section 13) Surveyed May 1999

Aquatic Invasive Species in Muskoka. March 2010

Smart Prevention of Aquatic Invasive

Fishing/Outreach Survey, 2014 Report

Below the Surface: Aquatic Invasives

December 18, Dear Sir/Madam,

Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS) pathways

Aquatic Invasive Species Outreach Program

Crawford Reservoir. FISH SURVEY AND MANAGEMENT INFORMATION Eric Gardunio, Fish Biologist Montrose Service Center

Onondaga Lake Fishery: 2011 Fact Sheet

Delaware Estuary Aquatic Nuisance Species of Concern Summary of ANS Survey, Summer 2002 Kirstin Wakefield, DEP & Ann Faulds, PA Sea Grant

Tampier Lake Population Survey

Shallow Lake Management Strategies. Steve McComas Blue Water Science Shallow Lakes Forum April 2014

Clean Boats, Clean Waters. Watercraft Inspection Program

Fish Community. Fish Habitat, Streams and Rivers

Reflections: Standley Lake by Kelly Cline, October, 2008

EMPIRE TOWNSHIP ORDINANCE NO AQUATIC NUISANCES ORDINANCE

Busse Reservoir South Lateral Pool Population Survey

Exploring the relationship between native smallmouth bass and invasive mussels in the Huron Erie Corridor

Crooked Lake Oakland County (T4N, R9E, Sections 3, 4, 9) Surveyed May James T. Francis

Maple Lake Population Survey

Invasive Species Prevention. For Birch Island Lake Association May 26, 2018

Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, 2 Environment Canada, 3. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.

Fisheries Survey of White Rapids Flowage, Marinette County Wisconsin during Waterbody Identification Code

Proposed Changes to Bag and Size Limits Minnesota/Wisconsin Border Waters of the Mississippi River

Aquatic Invasive Species

Voluntary Aquatic Invasive Species Prevention Verification for Aquaculture and Baitfish Sectors in the Great Lakes Region?

Stopping Invasive Species

Rolling Knolls Pond Population Survey

Status of Lake Erie s Western Basin Fish Populations: Trends and Environmental Conditions

Bode Lake - South Population Survey

Name That Fish : Identify living things using an existing classification key, and explain the rationale used.

MARTINDALE POND Wayne County 2004 Fish Management Report. Christopher C. Long Assistant Fisheries Biologist

JadEco, LLC PO BOX 445 Shannon, IL 61078

Comprehensive Fisheries Survey of High Falls Reservoir, Marinette County Wisconsin during 2004 and Waterbody Identification Code

Dexter Marsh Wildlife Management Area and Muskellunge Creek: Water Hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) Assessment

AQUATIC INVASIVE SPECIES PREVENTION FOR LAKE GEORGE PUBLIC HEARING MAY 21, LAKE GEORGE

MISSISSIPPI MAKEOVER A Plan for Restoration, Just Around the Bend

LAKE PLEASANT Steuben County 2006 Fish Management Report. Larry A. Koza Assistant Fisheries Biologist

SPRING THE SEASON OF SUNSHINE AND SHOWERS. May 2017

Cedar Lake Comprehensive Survey Report Steve Hogler and Steve Surendonk WDNR-Mishicot

Invasive Species. Objectives. Background

Fisheries and Lake Management Planning. CAP Mtg Nov21,2012 Brett Tregunno Aquatic Biologist, Kawartha Conservation

I Region I Area I DOW Number / County I DOW Lake Name I Acreage I

Lake Service Provider Training Manual for Preventing the Spread of Aquatic Invasive Species Version 3.3

Pickwick Lake 2018 REEL FACTS Trevor Knight Fisheries Biologist (662)

Aquatic Plant Point-Intercept Survey for Pike Lake, Scott County, Minnesota

Public Input to St. Lawrence River Fisheries Community Objectives

Brant Lake Aquatic Invasive Species Training Brant Lake, NY July 30 th, 2010

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

Riding Mountain National Park Fishing Regulations Summary

Sag Quarry - West Population Survey

Spring Coming This Spring! Walleye Population and Angler Study (Page 5)

2010 Fishing Opener Prognosis. Central Region

Green Lake Population Survey

A SURVEY OF THE PRETTY LAKE FISH COMMUNITY, LARGEMOUTH BASS AND WALLEYE POPULATIONS AND FISH HARVEST LaGrange County 2010

Big Portage Lake Riparian Owners Association June 2018

Who is developing this NAAHP?

Shoreline News. January New Big Portage Lake Website

FISH COMMUNITIES AND FISHERIES OF THE THOUSAND ISLANDS AND MIDDLE CORRIDOR

Citizens and Professionals Respond to Zebra Muscle Threat by Cathie Erickson

Categorical Exclusion Portage Lake Aquatic Organism Passage Project 1

Michigan Dept. of Natural Resources Status of the Fishery Resource Report Page 1. Weber Lake Cheboygan County, T34N, R3W, Sec.

Wampum Lake Population Survey

SKIATOOK LAKE MANAGEMENT PLAN

REQUEST FOR BID FOR DIVER ASSISTED SUCTION HARVESTING

Arrowhead Lake Population Survey

Caro Impoundment, Tuscola County

Transcription:

Waupaca Chain O' Lakes Anonymous Stakeholder Survey Surveys Distributed: 84 Surveys Returned: 432 Rate: 54% Chain Property 1. On which lake of the Chain do you reside or own property? Percent Columbia 15.% 64 Long 12.6% 54 Round 1.1% 43 Sunset 8.4% 36 McCrossen 8.2% 35 Miner 7.2% 31 Taylor 7.% 3 Dake 6.8% 29 Rainbow 5.1% 22 Otter 4.2% 18 Beasley 2.6% 11 Nessling 2.6% 11 Lime Kiln 2.3% 1 Ottman 2.1% 9 Marl 1.6% 7 Bass 1.2% 5 Manomin 1.2% 5 Orlando.9% 4 Youngs.7% 4 Knight.2% 1 428 3 7 6 4 3 2 1 217 Onterra, LLC

2. How is your property used? Percent Primary residence 34.1% 145 Seasonal residence 41.2% 175 Weekend retreat 16.9% 72 Rental 2.6% 11 Undeveloped.7% 3 Other please specify. 4.5% 19 425 7 3. How many days each year do you or others use your property? 411 411 21 Category % s (# of days) to 1 156 38% 11 to 2 115 28% 21 to 3 24 6% 31 to 365 116 28% 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 to 1 11 to 2 21 to 3 31 to 365 Days 217 Onterra, LLC

4. How many years have you owned Chain property? 425 425 7 Category % s (# of years) to 5 57 13% 6 to 1 33 8% 11 to 15 4 9% 16 to 2 52 12% 21 to 25 39 9% >25 24 48% 22 2 18 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 to 5 6 to 1 11 to 15 Years 16 to 2 21 to 25 >25 217 Onterra, LLC

Recreational Activity on the Chain 5. How many years ago did you first visit the Chain? Category (# of days) s 413 413 19 % to 1 14 3% 11 to 2 28 7% 21 to 3 29 7% 31 to 4 59 14% 41 to 82 2% 51 to 6 94 23% >6 17 26% 11 1 9 8 7 6 4 3 2 1 to 1 11 to 2 21 to 3 31 to 4 Years 41 to 51 to 6 >6 217 Onterra, LLC

6. What are your reasons for owning Chain property? Percent Swimming 85.1% 365 Canoeing/Kayaking 79.5% 341 Motor Boating 76.7% 329 Nature viewing 7.2% 31 Water Skiing/Tubing 56.2% 241 Fishing, open water 49.4% 212 Paddle Boarding 38.2% 164 Jet Skiing 18.% 77 Ice Fishing 15.4% 66 Cross ry Skiing 15.4% 66 Sailing 14.% 6 Snowmobiling/ATV 7.5% 32 Other please specify. 15.2% 65 429 3 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 7. Have you fished on the Chain in the last three years? Percent No 46.2% 198 Yes 53.9% 231 429 3 217 Onterra, LLC

8. For how many years have you fished on the Chain? 224 224 28 Category % s (# of years) to 1 41 18% 11 to 2 42 19% 21 to 3 28 13% 31 to 4 37 17% 41 to 35 16% 51 to 6 21 9% >6 2 9% 45 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 to 1 11 to 2 21 to 3 31 to 4 Years 41 to 51 to 6 >6 217 Onterra, LLC

9. What species of fish do you like to catch? Percent Bluegill/Sunfish 6.3% 14 Largemouth Bass 53.% 123 Smallmouth Bass 51.3% 119 Crappie 42.7% 99 Northern Pike 35.3% 82 Walleye 28.9% 67 Yellow Perch 27.6% 64 All fish species 21.1% 49 Trout 12.9% 3 Muskellunge 1.3% 24 Other please specify..4% 1 232 2 1 125 1 75 25 217 Onterra, LLC

1. How would you describe your quality of fishing on the Chain? Poor Fair Moderate Good Excellent 25 82 77 45 3 232 232 2 9 8 7 6 4 3 2 1 Poor Fair Moderate Good Excellent 217 Onterra, LLC

11. How has your quality of fishing changed since you started fishing Chain lakes? Somewhat Somewhat Worse Same Worse Better 125 Better 44 7 14 6 1 225 225 27 1 75 25 Worse Somewhat Worse Same Somewhat Better Better 217 Onterra, LLC

12. What types of watercraft do you use on the Chain? Percent Canoe/Kayak 82.2% 352 Pontoon 73.8% 316 Motorboat, greater than hp 42.5% 182 Paddleboard 38.6% 165 Paddleboat 27.6% 118 Rowboat 27.1% 116 Motorboat, hp or less 24.1% 13 Jet Ski 16.8% 72 Sailboat 11.5% 49 Jet Boat 2.8% 12 Do not use watercraft on the Chain.7% 3 No Yes 428 4 13. Do you use your watercraft on waters other than the Chain? Percent 88.1% 376 11.9% 51 427 5 Canoe/Kayak Pontoon Motorboat, greater than hp Paddleboard Paddleboat Rowboat Motorboat, hp or less Jet Ski Sailboat Jet Boat Do not use watercraft on the Chain 3 6 9 12 1 18 21 24 27 3 33 36 217 Onterra, LLC

14. What is your typical cleaning routine after using your watercraft on waters other than the Chain? Percent Remove aquatic hitch hikers like plant material, clams, mussels 71.1% 32 Drain bilge 6.% 27 Rinse boat 57.8% 26 Power wash boat 37.8% 17 Apply bleach 6.7% 3 Do not clean boat 2.2% 1 Other please specify. 8 45 387 217 Onterra, LLC

Chain Current and Historic Condition, Health and Management 15. What type of effect has each of the following factors caused to the Chain waters? Negative Somewhat Negative No Impact Somewhat Positive Positive Do Not Know Rating Average Watercraft traffic 149 172 53 7 6 17 1.33 44 Aquatic plant growth 133 163 36 16 7 37 1.36 392 Property development 82 139 91 37 15 28 1.35 392 Algae blooms 149 136 51 1 1 51 1.1 389 Fishing 16 51 175 45 44 57 1.11 388 Shoreline erosion 9 13 126 7 2 31.98 386 Noise/Light pollution 99 154 97 4 31 1.9 385 Other please specify. 64 Watercraft traffic Aquatic plant growth Property development Algae blooms Fishing Shoreline erosion Noise/Light pollution 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 Negative Somewhat Negative No Impact Somewhat Positive Positive Do Not Know 413 19 217 Onterra, LLC

16. How would you describe the current water quality of the Chain? Poor Fair Moderate Good Excellent 5 3 77 243 73 428 428 4 2 225 2 175 1 125 1 75 25 Poor Fair Moderate Good Excellent 217 Onterra, LLC

17. How has the water quality changed since you first visited the Chain? Degraded Slightly Slightly Same Improved Worse Improved 55 165 157 21 22 42 42 12 18 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 Degraded Slightly Worse Same Slightly Improved Improved 18. Before reading the statement above, had you ever 19. Are you aware that some AIS mentioned about are present in the heard of AIS? Chain? Percent Percent No 6.8% 29 No 3.8% 15 Yes 93.2% 399 Yes 96.2% 378 428 393 4 39 217 Onterra, LLC

2. Which AIS do you think are in the Chain? Percent Zebra mussels 92.% 345 Purple loosestrife 85.9% 322 Eurasian water milfoil 8.% 3 Curly leaf pondweed.9% 191 Rusty crayfish 18.9% 71 Carp 13.3% Pale yellow iris 12.% 45 Chinese mystery snail 3.7% 14 Freshwater jellyfish 3.2% 12 Spiny water flea 3.2% 12 Alewife 2.7% 1 Round goby 1.9% 7 Heterosporosis, yellow perch parasite 1.3% 5 Flowering rush 1.1% 4 Rainbow smelt.5% 2 Other please specify. 5.3% 2 375 57 3 3 2 2 1 1 217 Onterra, LLC

21. AIS can be managed using various techniques. What is your level of support for responsible use of the following? Items marked * require a DNR permit. None Low Moderate High Complete Rating Average Hand removal by property owners 19 52 96 129 86 2.55 382 Herbicide/Chemical control* 18 44 13 122 68 2.47 382 Natural biological control such as Loosestrife beetle, milfoil weevil, etc.* 11 29 77 145 117 2.87 379 Hand removal by divers* 24 56 94 112 87 2.49 373 Allow growth of AIS to continue 265 6 2 7 14.48 366 Bottom sediment removal* 25 83 96 77 78 2.28 359 398 34 None 1% 9% 8% Low 7% 6% % Moderate 4% 3% High 2% 1% Complete % Hand removal by property owners Herbicide/Chemical control* Natural biological control such as Loosestrife beetle, milfoil weevil, etc.* Hand removal by divers* Allow growth of AIS to continue Bottom sediment removal* 217 Onterra, LLC

22. Are you aware that in past years natural biological and herbicide/chemical controls were used to treat Eurasian watermilfoil, curly leaf pondweed and purple loosestrife on the Chain? Percent No 14.6% 62 Yes 85.5% 364 426 6 (WCOLD) 23. Which of the following WCOLD publications do you read? No Yes Article in Lake Association spring newsletter each March 55 353 48 Aquatic invasive species (AIS) treatment notice each May 72 325 397 Annual meeting notice and proposed annual budget each July 11 288 389 417 15 217 Onterra, LLC

24. How often have you attended the WCOLD annual meeting each August? Never Rarely Sometimes Regularly 226 86 79 34 425 425 7 2 225 2 175 1 125 1 75 25 Never Rarely Sometimes Regularly 217 Onterra, LLC

25. How often have you looked at the WCOLD website, waupacachainolakesdistrict.com? Never Rarely Sometimes Regularly 243 112 54 8 417 417 15 2 225 2 175 1 125 1 75 25 Never Rarely Sometimes Regularly 217 Onterra, LLC

26. About which of the following topics would you like to learn more? Percent Aquatic Invasive Species 54.1% 23 Shoreland Restoration/Preservation 44.5% 167 Chain Habitats 33.3% 125 Watercraft Regulations 32.3% 121 Lake Stewardship 31.5% 118 Citizen Lake Monitoring 25.6% 96 Clean Boats/Clean Waters 19.7% 74 Not interested 13.3% 375 57 Aquatic Invasive Species 25 75 1 125 1 175 2 225 Shoreland Restoration/Preservation Chain Habitats Watercraft Regulations Lake Stewardship Citizen Lake Monitoring Clean Boats/Clean Waters Not interested 217 Onterra, LLC

27. For what activities would you consider volunteering if the WCOLD would need assistance? Percent Do not wish to volunteer 66.6% 245 Monitoring water quality, Secchi testing 22.% 81 Inspecting watercraft at boat landings 11.7% 43 Becoming a WCOLD board or committee member 8.7% 32 Attending annual spring Wisconsin Lakes Convention 7.6% 28 2 368 64 2 1 1 Do not wish to volunteer Monitoring water quality, Secchi testing Inspecting watercraft at boat landings Becoming a WCOLD board or committee member Attending annual spring Wisconsin Lakes Convention 217 Onterra, LLC