BRML INM. National Metrology Institute. COOMET Comparison COOMET.L-S20 676/MD/15. Calibration of gauge blocks by comparison. Technical protocol

Similar documents
Bi-lateral Comparison (APMP.L-K ) Calibration of Step Gauge

COOMET TECHNICAL COMMITTEE 1.8 PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY

COOMET TECHNICAL COMMITTEE 1.8 PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY. CООМЕТ project 576/RU/12

Procedure Instruction of program Pressurized Enclosure - Test Round 2017

Force Standards Comparison between Mexico and Brazil. Jorge C. Torres Guzmán*, Daniel Ramírez Ahedo*, Jorge P. Cruz**, Jorge M. E.

GUIDANCE FOR THE APPLICATION OF EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION AND TRACEABILITY OF MEASUREMENTS ON INSPECTION BODIES

EURAMET.L-S26 Measurement of groove depth standards in the range 1 µm up to 1 mm

COMPARISON OF ULTRASONIC HYDROPHONE CALIBRATIONS. IN THE FREQUENCY RANGE 0.5 MHz to 20 MHz. Srinath Rajagopal and Bajram Zeqiri

Guide No. 2/2009. Design, training and equipment Martin Firlus. Physikalisch Technische Bundesanstalt Braunschweig und Berlin

Traceable calibration of automatic weighing instruments in dynamic operation

Interlaboratory comparison in the pressure range from 0 to 2 MPa for accredited calibration laboratories

Beamex. Calibration White Paper. Weighing scale calibration - How to calibrate weighing instruments

Guideline for RMO Key comparison for Air kerma rate in 60 Co gamma radiation

Chairman s Annual Report (2004/2005)

Specific Accreditation Criteria Calibration ISO IEC Annex. Mass and related quantities

Primary Standardisations and Traceability for Radioactivity supporting Nuclear Medicine John Keightley

Technical protocol of APMP key comparison for measurement of air kerma for 60 Co (APMP.RI(I)-K1.1)

Withdrawn at December 31, Guideline DKD-R 6-2. Calibration of Measuring Devices for Vacuum DEUTSCHER KALIBRIERDIENST. Part 3

VITLAB micropipette. Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

Supersedes: The copy of this document located on Measurement Canada s website is considered to be the controlled copy.

PTB Ex PT Scheme. Procedure Instruction of program Explosion Pressure - Test Round 2017

Pressure Metrology in Mexico

Sartorius CCL kg Prototype Mass Comparator

SIM MWG7 Mass and Related Quantities. Report to CCM

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

KENYA ACCREDITATION SERVICE

ISO Vacuum gauges Calibration by direct comparison with a reference gauge

at NIST: ultra-low outgassing rates

CORESTA RECOMMENDED METHOD N 6

VITLAB Volumetric instruments

Certification of AMS acc. EN 15267, Part 3 - Overview and First Experience -

TG GUIDELINES CONCERNING CALIBRATION INTERVALS AND RECALIBRATION

ISO 6570 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Natural gas Determination of potential hydrocarbon liquid content Gravimetric methods

MET-101 Introduction to Metrology

CCT-K8 Comparison of realizations of local scales of dew-point temperature of humid gas. Dew-point Temperature: 30 C to 95 C

2014 Programme of Training Courses in Measurement & Calibration

Determination of Air Density with Buoyancy Artefacts

Comparison APMP.QM-S2.1 Oxygen in nitrogen at atmospheric level

Technical protocol of APMP key comparison for measurement of absorbed dose to water for 60 Co (APMP.RI(I)-K4)

DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE OF THE NEW SARTORIUS 1 KG VACUUM MASS COMPARATOR AT PTB

Impact of imperfect sealing on the flow measurement of natural gas by orifice plates

Proficiency Testing for Surface Roughness Standard and Groove Depth Standard

Mechanical Qualification (MQ) for Apparatus 1 and 2. Oct 10th, 2008

OXFORD CALIBRATION WEIGHTS CLASS E1, E2, F1

DK46 - DK800 Supplementary instructions

METROLOGICAL ASSURENCE OF O3, CO2, CH4 AND CO CONTROL IN ATMOSPHERE

Requirements for the certification of movements and mechanical watches resistant to magnetic fields of 1.5 T ( G)

Compiled by: B Beard. Approved by: SH Carstens. Description of requirements and procedures for compact provers to be used as verification standards.

Bubble Viscometers A5-A1 / A-T / U-Z6 / Z7-Z10

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005

EURAMET Report to 8th AFRIMETS General Assembly Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 16 to 19 June 2014

Name of product: Gripper for vertical façade FTV panels Types: PVF (60, 80, 100, 120, 133, 150, 172, 200 and 240 mm) INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE

Organisation Internationale de Métrologie Légale

Light Lab. Reliable Measurements through Regular Calibration. DAkkS

General Accreditation Guidance. User checks and maintenance of laboratory balances

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

GMC-I Service GmbH Calibration Center

PROPERTY INSURANCE ASSOCIATION OF LOUISIANA

Date of Shipment: Xxxxx 00, 20xx 3402c National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology National Metrology Institute of

Final Report on the CIPM Key Comparisons for Compressed Air and Nitrogen Conducted in November 2004 / June 2005 CCM.FF-5.b

International comparison protocol for the key comparison of 1 kg stainless steel standards.

University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board. Reliance Agreement Guidance: How to Apply for External IRB Review

Mandatory Bulletin BO

VA FLOWMETERS Supplementary Instructions

SAUTER FK Version /2016 GB

Transferpette -8/-12

Investigating the effects of interchanging components used to perform ripple assessments on calibrated vector network analysers

Ships tank - General requirements

IN-PLACE DENSITY OF BITUMINOUS MIXES USING THE NUCLEAR MOISTURE-DENSITY GAUGE FOP FOR WAQTC TM 8

Gilson Aqua-Check Moisture Tester MA-26X

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

EURAMET P1061 COMPARISON OF AIR TEMPERATURE CALIBRATIONS

Any use of this material except in accordance with a written agreement with Western Power is prohibited.

LIST OF REQUIREMENTS FOR ORGANISERS OF THE FIA INTERNATIONAL HILL-CLIMB CHALLENGE

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Precision Hydrogen (All B&W Screen Models)

Operating Instructions METTLER TOLEDO Pipette Check Application for AX and MX/UMX Balances Version 1.xx

Certified Reference Materials FOR REFRACTOMETERS AND POLARIMETERS

General European OMCL Network (GEON) QUALITY MANAGEMENT DOCUMENT

CALIBRATION SERVICES HUMIDITY DEW POINT AIR VELOCITY MASS FLOW TEMPERATURE CO 2 PRESSURE. (+34)

JOS 15 JOS 25 JOS 40. Manual and semiautomatic test benches from DN 25 to DN 40. Characteristics. Basic characteristics. Test bench using balances

THE USE OF Z FACTORS IN GRAVIMETRIC VOLUME MEASUREMENTS

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Steel wire ropes for the petroleum and natural gas industries Minimum requirements and terms of acceptance

Speciality Gases Practice 4. Our quality, your safety. Accredited Test and Calibration Laboratory Speciality Gases Centre in Hörstel.

Place: National Sport Hall Sala Polivalenta Address: Calea Piscului Nr. 10, Sector 4, Bucharest. Single Elimination Tournament (WTF Competition Rules)

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005 & ANSI/NCSL Z

Australian Standard. Bourdon tube pressure and vacuum gauges AS

John Wright NIST Fluid Metrology Group February 21, 2013

Netball Australia Bench Officials Accreditation Framework. Updated 2015

Equipment Accuracy / Selection

Requirements and Methods for Calibration of Equipment in Clinical Laboratories. NK Chan (HKRCBTS) 24 August 2007

Recommended Practices for Calibration Laboratories

Target disk flowmeter Series DP. Instructions manual DP65 DP500. R-MI-DP Rev.: 4 English version

Elcometer ISO Groove Depth Checker. Operating Instructions

Predicted Dispense Volume vs. Gravimetric Measurement for the MICROLAB 600. November 2010

Netball Australia Bench Officials Accreditation Framework. Updated 2018

Vehicle-mounted meters, pump supplied

Test pumps. Pressure sources. Good reasons for proper and reliable calibration

Polarimeter tubes and accessories

AWS C2.21M/C2.21:2003 An American National Standard. Specification for Thermal Spray Equipment Acceptance Inspection

Transcription:

BRML INM National Metrology Institute COOMET Comparison COOMET.L-S20 676/MD/5 Calibration of gauge blocks by comparison Technical protocol

Contents. INTRODUCTION... 3 2. ORGANISATION... 3 2.. Participants... 3 2.2. Time schedule... 4 2.3. Transportation... 4 2.4. Unpacking, Handling, Packing... 4 2.5. Financial aspects, insurance... 5 3. DESCRIPTION OF THE STANDARDS... 5 4. MEASUREMENT INSTRUCTIONS... 5 5. MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY... 6 6. REPORTING... 6 2

. Introduction. The metrological equivalence of national measurement standards will be determined by a set of key and supplementary comparisons chosen and organized by the Consultative Committees of the CIPM working closely with the Regional Metrology Organizations (RMOs)..2 The comparison is organised within the Twinning MD/3/ENP/TR/4 Strengthening of the standards and metrology sector according to the best practice in the EU Member States..3 BRML INM RO is acting as the pilot laboratory and in this function is responsible for providing the travelling standard, receives the participant s measurement results, the evaluation of the measurement results and the final report. INM MD fulfils the role of co-pilot laboratory and in this function is responsible for the registration the comparison and for the approving the technical protocol and the final report..4 The comparison will be conducted in accordance with the rules and procedures for comparisons COOMET and BIPM Guidelines for Planning, Organising, Conducting and Reporting Key, Supplementary and Pilot Comparisons..5 A goal of the this comparisons is to demonstrate the equivalence of routine calibration services offered by NMIs to clients, as listed in Appendix C of the Mutual Recognition Agreement (MRA) [BIPM, 999]. To this end, participants in this comparison agree to use the same apparatus and methods as routinely applied to client artefacts. 2. Organisation The technical protocol has been drafted by the pilot laboratory with assistance from INM Moldavia. 2.. Participants DE Peter Franke LT Lilija Chaleckienė Pilot: RO Alexandru Duta Co-pilot: MD Alexandru Mîrza PTB - Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt Bundesallee 00 D-386 Braunschweig Deutschland (Germany) VMC - Vilniaus Metrologijos Centras Dariaus ir Gireno g. 23, LT-0289, Vilnius, Lietuva INM National Institute of Metrology, Sos. Vitan-Bârzesti RO-75669 Bucharest 4 ROMANIA INM - National Institute of Metrology 28 E. Coca str., MD 2064, CHISINAU Tel.: +49 (0)53 592 5430 Fax. e-mail: peter.franke@ptb.de Tel. +370 5 26496 +370 685 69775 e-mail: l.chaleckiene@vmc.lt Tel. +40 334 50 60 Fax. +40 334 55 33 e-mail: Alexandru.duta@inm.ro Tel. +373 22 903 9 Fax. +373 22 903 e-mail: lungimi@metrologie.md 3

2.2. Time schedule Each laboratory has approximately 4 weeks for calibration, including transportation. Laboratory Country Date BRML - INM RO June 206 PTB DE July 206 INM MD August 206 VMC LT September 206 BRML - INM RO October 206 2.3. Transportation Transportation is each laboratory s own responsibility and cost. The standards are packed in a box ready to be shipped. The gauge blocks are stored in a wooden box with serial (dimensions 260 mm x 20 mm x 50 mm). You are kindly asked to inform the pilot laboratory by fax immediately after receiving the gauge blocks using the fax form in the annex. Immediately after completing the measurements, the pack has to be sent or taken to BRML - INM. It is advisable to prepare and organize this transportation beforehand. Please inform the coordinator fax or e-mail about date of shipment, transportation company and flight details. 2.4. Unpacking, Handling, Packing The package contains the following items: one wooden box containing 9 gauge blocks The technical protocol will be emailed to each participant at the start of the project and will not be sent separately with the gauge blocks. After receiving the package, the standards have to be inspected carefully for any damage, scratches or rust. The gauges should be de-greased. The gauge blocks must be handled with care! Any damage has to be communicated to the pilot laboratory. The measurement surfaces should never be re-lapped or re-polished! After the measurements, the gauge blocks have to be cleaned and the steel gauge should be greased. All gauges should be wrapped in anti-rust-paper. Ensure that the content of the package is complete before shipment. Use always the original package unless is becomes too damaged. 4

2.5. Financial aspects, insurance Each participating laboratory covers the costs for the measurements, transportation and eventual customs formalities as well as for any damages that may have occurred within its country. The overall costs for the organisation and for the devices are covered by the organising pilot laboratory. The pilot laboratory has no insurance for any loss or damage of the standards during transportation. 3. Description of the Standards The package contains 9 gauge blocks made of steel. The gauge blocks are Calibration grade K and of rectangular cross section, according to the international standard ISO 3650. Identification No. Nominal length Expansion coefficient Manufacturer (mm) (0-6 K - ) 87556 unknown KOBA 87556 5 unknown KOBA 87556 0 unknown KOBA 87556 5 unknown KOBA 87556 20 unknown KOBA 87556 25 unknown KOBA 87556 50 unknown KOBA 87556 75 unknown KOBA 87556 00 unknown KOBA 4. Measurement instructions Before and after the calibration, the gauge blocks have to be inspected on damage on the measurement surfaces. Any scratches, rusty spots or other damages has to be documented by a drawing or sketching in the appropriate form in the annex 2. The wringing properties of all measuring faces have to be tested and documented before and after the calibration. The gauges should be left in the laboratory environment for an adequate period to allow temperature stabilisation. The gauge block temperature and/or surface plate temperature should be recorded at the beginning and end of the calibration. The gauge blocks should be measured by mechanical comparison with the laboratory s reference gauge blocks, using the normal calibration procedure. The PTB will calibrate the deviation of the central length from the nominal length by interferometry method and the deviations f o and f u by mechanical comparison method. The following are the measurands for each gauge block: Deviation of the central length l c (at P in figure below) from the nominal length l n Where possible, deviation from nominal length, measured at points P2 to P5. These values will be used by each participant to calculate f o and f u, for each gauge, according to ISO 3650. The results should be recorded in Annex. 5

The figure shows the measuring points on the gauge block P5 P4 P P2 P3 The gauges should be positioned as follows: -, 5 and 0 mm gauge blocks the measuring face with the nominal size markings should face upwards with the nominal size mark on the left side of the gauge facing the operator: - 5, 20, 25, 50, 75 and 00 mm gauge blocks the side of the gauge with the nominal size marking should be standing vertically, facing the operator with the numerals running up the gauge side: 5. Measurement uncertainty The uncertainty of measurement shall be estimated and reported as would be normal for mechanical comparison according to the ISO Guide for the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. 6. Reporting The quality of the measurement surfaces of the gauge blocks, the measurement results, instrument descriptions and a detailed evaluation of the uncertainty of measurement have to be reported using the forms enclosed in the annex. Handwritten notes are sufficient but electronic submission is preferred. The measurement report forms in the annex of this document are sent by e-mail (Word document) to all participating laboratories. It would be appreciated if the report forms (in particular the results sheet) could be completed by computer and sent back electronically to the coordinator. In any case, the signed report must also be sent in paper form by mail. In case of any differences, the paper forms are considered to be the valid version. 6

The reports shall be sent to the pilot laboratory within four weeks after completing the measurements. No information about differences of the reported results with respect to other laboratories will be discussed before the completion of the comparison, unless large deviations of particular laboratories with respect to the preliminary reference results obtained by the pilot laboratory have been observed. In the latter case the laboratory in question will be contacted. Within 2 months after completion of the circulation, the pilot and co-pilot laboratories will prepare a first draft report and send it to the participants for comment. Subsequently, the procedure outlined in the BIPM Guidelines will be followed. 7

Annex : Measurement results for steel gauges P5 P2 P P4 P3 Nominal length Deviation of the central length from the nominal lenght Uncertainty (k=) u(l c-l n) Deviation from the central f o Deviation from the central f u Uncertainty (k=) u(fo/ fu) Ident.- No. [mm] l c - l n [nm] [nm] [nm] [nm] [nm] 5 0 5 20 25 50 75 00 Please prepare a detailed uncertainty budget for the calibration of the 00 mm gauge block using the form in Annex 3.

Annex 2: Inspection of the measurement surfaces, steel gauge blocks The wringing properties of all measuring faces have to be tested and documented before and after the calibration. mm 5 mm 0 mm marked unmarked marked unmarked right left 5 mm 20 mm 25 mm right left right left right left 50 mm 75 mm 00 mm right left right left right left 2

Annex 3: Uncertainty of Measurement The statement of uncertainty in the result form in Annexes should be consistent with the ISO-Guide for the expression of uncertainty in measurement. Please indicate below if possible, the different input quantities which have been used to estimate the reported uncertainty. Please extend and edit the tables as necessary. This detailed information is provided for the 00 mm block. Uncertainty evaluation for 00 mm steel gauge block Input Quantity Description Assumed distribution Type A or Type B Standard uncertainty value (k=) 2 3 4 5 6 7 Combined standard uncertainty (u c)=

Annex 4: Description of the measurement instrument Make and type of comparator... Resolution of Comparator & electronics Type and grade of reference gauge block used Range of gauge block temperature during measurement...

Telefax Telefax Telefax Telefax Telefax To: INM National Institute of Metrology, Sos. Vitan-Bârzesti RO-75669 Bucharest 4 ROMANIA From: We confirm having received the standards of the COOMET.L-S.. supplementary comparison on. After visual inspection no damage has been noticed (the package) the following damage(s) must be reported:............ Date: Signature: